I have a quesiton about QL3000, I learned both QL3000 QL7000 will be selling without lens? What if my room size is a little bit short to throw a 135 inches screen(base on its throw ratio 1.52),and I did some research it can do short throw by using epson's ultra short lens xo2s lens,but only up to 120 inches?do they have other options? thanks!
Epson continues to use a native 1920 x 1080 resolution with pixel-shifting technology to simulate 4K in their new Q series projector lineup. While this may be acceptable for models like the QL1000 and QL3000, the QL7000W projector should have featured true 4K native 3LCD panels for a more premium experience. Especially considering that its competitors offer native 4K chips at a similar price point, the QL7000W projector should have included true 4K native 3LCD panels to remain competitive.
Epson explained their reasoning to us: www.avnirvana.com/threads/epson-breaks-the-mold-takes-aim-at-higher-end-projectors-with-its-new-4k-q-series.14024/
Goodbye real budget projectors. I am afraid at this rate TVs will rapidly gain more ground over PJs unless there's more competition which hopefully can bring the prices down. These are only my thoughts for an average household.
@@Carl-iw9sy important to keep in mind that these are focused toward the custom install circuit. Pricing is certainly high, but that’s by design as it’s meant to match room builds that are super expensive. Epson will continue making budget oriented projectors!
Give me these with 3D and I am all in!
Just out of curiosity, what kind of content are you watching in 3D?
@@av_nirvana 3D bluray movies! Watched Moana 3D with the fam today! Next up, Ghost in the Shell 3D. 😁👍👍
I have a quesiton about QL3000, I learned both QL3000 QL7000 will be selling without lens? What if my room size is a little bit short to throw a 135 inches screen(base on its throw ratio 1.52),and I did some research it can do short throw by using epson's ultra short lens xo2s lens,but only up to 120 inches?do they have other options? thanks!
Epson continues to use a native 1920 x 1080 resolution with pixel-shifting technology to simulate 4K in their new Q series projector lineup. While this may be acceptable for models like the QL1000 and QL3000, the QL7000W projector should have featured true 4K native 3LCD panels for a more premium experience. Especially considering that its competitors offer native 4K chips at a similar price point, the QL7000W projector should have included true 4K native 3LCD panels to remain competitive.
Epson explained their reasoning to us: www.avnirvana.com/threads/epson-breaks-the-mold-takes-aim-at-higher-end-projectors-with-its-new-4k-q-series.14024/
I totally agree. This is why I am still on my 5050ub. I refuse to upgrade until they go full native 4k dynamic tone mapping built in.
I believe it has to do with achieved brightness, from what Epson mentioned, in the past.
@@SnakeDoctor5104 exactly right. It’s 4 way shifting, so all 4K pixels are shown at the same time… but 1080p imagers are used to improve light output
@@av_nirvana Sony's new 8000 and 9000 series both have hdr tone mapping now
Goodbye real budget projectors. I am afraid at this rate TVs will rapidly gain more ground over PJs unless there's more competition which hopefully can bring the prices down. These are only my thoughts for an average household.
@@Carl-iw9sy important to keep in mind that these are focused toward the custom install circuit. Pricing is certainly high, but that’s by design as it’s meant to match room builds that are super expensive. Epson will continue making budget oriented projectors!