C'mon man, the man who has a positive score against the first two on the list who are considered as two greatest is on the 6th place, you're kidding me right??
You can't, by any meaning, put Nadal and Federer before Djokovic. Like it or not, he beat them in their prime so many times. He won like 5 finals in a row vs Nadal, and he humiliated Federer 2-3 times. He is the first player to beat Nadal in only 2 sets in Nadal's prime.
The biggest mistake is to compare differet generations that played under totally different conditions! How many Slams would have Federer won in the 70ties with wodden racket??
@@MrPernell27 Um yes he did. Wimbledon, US Open 2015, Australia, French 2016. 4 in a row. Federer has never achieved this. Djokovic held all of the GS at the same time. First time it's been done since 1969. Moron.
Andy Murray is underrated, he wons 3 GS in Golden Era and played 8 finals, in other era he could won 7 or 8 GS. He won 14 Masters 1000, the fifth player of all time.
Still difficult to put him above agassi or borg who won so much… I don’t like to go too far back though, that tennis was way different. Sampras and agassi if a little younger though we can likely say would’ve been really good.
Dude Djokovic vs Nadal 25: 23, Djokovic Federer 25:20 what are we talking about, he started 2 years after a pro career than Nadal, and won Gold Slam, Djokovic in 2 years will be greatest of whole time you can't say anything because im right
Man are you crazy? You put Djokovic at 6th seed? He must be among top 3 players for all time. No one of these players can play versus him in his best form. I think anybody who knows something about this sport will agree with me..
I stopped watching when Djokovic popped up at 6. He's actually THE GOAT and that's what people will think of this when it's all said and done. But even if you disagree, 6 is ludicrous.
Laver could have won many many more GS titles but for the transition between amateur and pro status in the game. He was not allowed to play for 5 years in the Grand Slams at his peak due to him having turned professional, ie 20 Grand slam titles he could have had a good swipe at winning. Its also hard to compare champions of different eras.
Federer: GS (20) M1000 (28) Nadal: GS (19) M1000 (35) Djokovic: GS (17) M1000 (34) Any doubt obout the fact these 3 are above all? I can understand its difficult to admit for some old school fans but in an individual sports like tennis tittles determinate who is the best. Also these 3 players have played in same era and even thought they are really close in tittles so that means they would have fuck anyone if they had played in different eras.
Just an other Federer glorification vid. Federer is a great champ but many call him weak era champion because he had the best phase in his career with grand slam final opponents like JC Ferrero, Roddick, Bagdhatis, old Agassi with back pain, Philippousis, Söderling, young Nadal that had to develop a lot... And Djokovic??? He had Nadal, Federer, Murray, Wawrinka! Federer is not the Nr 1 in this ranking for me! And the biggest mistake is to compare differet generations that played under totally different conditions! How many Slams would have Federer won in the 70ties with wodden racket??
How can federer be number 1 which his got a bad record head to head against Rafa and Novak,, Federer is finished . And down the line nadal will ménage to beat head to head Djokovic so Nr 1 Nadal nr 2 Djokovic nr 3. Federer
This is my order 10- Andre Agassi 9- Ivan Lendl 8- Jimmy Connors 7- John McEnroe 6- Novak Djokovic 5- Bjorn Borg 4- Pete Sampras 3- Rafael Nadal 2-Rod Laver 1- Roger Federer
Novak is in the top 3 this is rigged. His mentality and cool under pressure even beats Federer on many levels Atleast after the 2010 season. Nadal I think is the best ever the way he’s fought through injuries and still won majors and tournaments despite playing through that pain tells me he is and he’s beaten the the top 5 guys playing through immense knee pain.
Djokovic should be at Number 3...he won majors in the reign of Nadal & Federer.. which is unbelievable...Sometimes I think he is even better than Nadal.
What a joke.....nooobody goes in front of Pete.......it is not EVEN tough call...........not even close.......someone here is blind or drunk to say no on that..
Nobody goes in front of Pete? Raf and Roger have both won not only more majors than Pete, but they have also won far more non-major tournaments than Pete. And Raf and Roger faced far stronger competition than Sampras. And Raf and Roger won on every major surface. They are complete players that can win on any surface. Pete was not a complete player. He was a specialist that played well on certain surfaces but the fact that he never won a match beyond the quarterfinals at Roland Garros shows that the highest he could possibly be in this list is 3rd or 4th. There is no way anyone can give serious consideration to him being 1st or 2nd. 1st and 2nd belong to Federer and Nadal. They have EARNED it. Sampras was a great and dominant player during the 90s but if he had to face Federer, Nadal, and Djokavic at their best then Sampras would have won far fewer tournaments and no one would even whisper that he was the best of all time.. And that is a fact.
SUPPORT THE CREATOR OF THE SONG: ruclips.net/video/BzV-cA3uwCI/видео.html
Update the list ..put djoker on 2nd
C'mon man, the man who has a positive score against the first two on the list who are considered as two greatest is on the 6th place, you're kidding me right??
Bullseye!
Completly agree. Federer, Rafa and Djokovic are the 3 best players by distance. Then you can make a ranking for the others but this is a fact.
1. Roger Federer 2. Rafa Nadal 3. Novak Djokovic 4.Pete Sampras 5.Rod laver 6. Jimmy Connors 7. Ivan Lendl 8. Bjorn Borg
9. John McEnroe 10. Agassi.
You can't, by any meaning, put Nadal and Federer before Djokovic. Like it or not, he beat them in their prime so many times. He won like 5 finals in a row vs Nadal, and he humiliated Federer 2-3 times. He is the first player to beat Nadal in only 2 sets in Nadal's prime.
MrMartin48705 are you serious dude? More majors. Don’t act like a little baby when things don’t go their way. Dominated Novak when he was young
The biggest mistake is to compare differet generations that played under totally different conditions! How many Slams would have Federer won in the 70ties with wodden racket??
Novak top 3 !
Nole, the man who won 4 GS in a row at 6th place? Ridiculous...
he did not win 4 in a row. Furthermore Federer got to 10 straight GS finals and won 7
MrPernell27 You say so proving you never watch tennis, (from wimbledon 2015 to roland garros 2016) :)))
No row: he didn't clinch RG. Nadal 2010 : RG, W, US , the three surfaces in a true row.
@@juanmartin8753 What do you mean no row? He won WIM, US Open in 2015 and he continued with AO and FO in 2016. That's 4 in a row man
@@MrPernell27 Um yes he did. Wimbledon, US Open 2015, Australia, French 2016. 4 in a row. Federer has never achieved this. Djokovic held all of the GS at the same time. First time it's been done since 1969. Moron.
Andy Murray is underrated, he wons 3 GS in Golden Era and played 8 finals, in other era he could won 7 or 8 GS. He won 14 Masters 1000, the fifth player of all time.
Djokovic is underrated in this video
Still difficult to put him above agassi or borg who won so much… I don’t like to go too far back though, that tennis was way different. Sampras and agassi if a little younger though we can likely say would’ve been really good.
Djokovic should be 3rd because he fought and defeated the two greatest of all times, Nadal and Federer a lot...
Spencer Panes 3rd and climbing
Absolutely, I wil not be surprised if one day Nadal and Djokovic will surpass Federer in Majors title... The competition is very close.
@@spencerpanes8748 You are right & Federer knows it well.
Dude Djokovic vs Nadal 25: 23, Djokovic Federer 25:20 what are we talking about, he started 2 years after a pro career than Nadal, and won Gold Slam, Djokovic in 2 years will be greatest of whole time you can't say anything because im right
You dont know about tennis if you put nole on 6
Wtf Djokovic at 6???
Pass me the joint bruh
Djokovic is best player of all time he beat rafa 26 times and federer 25,rafa beat djokovic 23 time and federee beat djokovic 11 time...
filip popovic Federer beat djokovic 11 times??🤣
filip popovic fed beat nole 22 times. hi
djokovic only beat old federer,he never faced primer roger
yeye sorry federer beat nadal 11 times
filip popovic he beat Nadal 15 times filip. Do some research first before you post anything.
Biggest lol for placing nole at 6th nd Pete at 4th.sampras was never a all round player. No career slam for him
Nole on 6, he is 3
At the moment Nole is the best
Man are you crazy? You put Djokovic at 6th seed? He must be among top 3 players for all time. No one of these players can play versus him in his best form. I think anybody who knows something about this sport will agree with me..
Djoker is number one the king of tennis
Time will tell
@@lionelbax5316 time is telling
Djoker on 6 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1 Nadal
2 Federer
3 Djokovic
Novak Djokovic is the best tennis player in the world.He is my favourite tennis player in the world.
Novak is the best tennis player ever
3rd and climbing !!!!!
I stopped watching when Djokovic popped up at 6. He's actually THE GOAT and that's what people will think of this when it's all said and done. But even if you disagree, 6 is ludicrous.
Djokovic is the greatest of all time and you really put him at 6th place
3. Djokovic.
2. Nadal.
1. Federer.
The Big 3.
Djokovic is the Nr1 ..... 26:22!!! 14GS in the golden aera of Nadal Federer .... Federer wins only 4GS 😫. Djokovic is the best ever !
some1 does not like Nole
Nole is 6.
Hahaha,incredible.
Novak the best of all time,very soon.
Batman nemesis should be 3rd not 6th.Beside,Rafa should be 1st not Fedex
great video
Laver could have won many many more GS titles but for the transition between amateur and pro status in the game. He was not allowed to play for 5 years in the Grand Slams at his peak due to him having turned professional, ie 20 Grand slam titles he could have had a good swipe at winning. Its also hard to compare champions of different eras.
Federer: GS (20) M1000 (28)
Nadal: GS (19) M1000 (35)
Djokovic: GS (17) M1000 (34)
Any doubt obout the fact these 3 are above all?
I can understand its difficult to admit for some old school fans but in an individual sports like tennis tittles determinate who is the best. Also these 3 players have played in same era and even thought they are really close in tittles so that means they would have fuck anyone if they had played in different eras.
Where is Matt from wii sports
Laver is 6
Novak is 3
Everything else - I agree)
Agassi is not better than lendl a
5:20 when Federer hears Djokovic is better than him
h2h
Roger y Rafa son los mejores.
Just an other Federer glorification vid. Federer is a great champ but many call him weak era champion because he had the best phase in his career with grand slam final opponents like JC Ferrero, Roddick, Bagdhatis, old Agassi with back pain, Philippousis, Söderling, young Nadal that had to develop a lot... And Djokovic??? He had Nadal, Federer, Murray, Wawrinka! Federer is not the Nr 1 in this ranking for me!
And the biggest mistake is to compare differet generations that played under totally different conditions! How many Slams would have Federer won in the 70ties with wodden racket??
Number 1: Gannondorf and link
novak is best of all time
i think if borg didnt retired at 26 he would fight federer the goat status
How can federer be number 1 which his got a bad record head to head against Rafa and Novak,, Federer is finished . And down the line nadal will ménage to beat head to head Djokovic so Nr 1 Nadal nr 2 Djokovic nr 3. Federer
Djokovic did destroy Nadal in their last match after a bad injury and a lot of off-court time. So I wouldn't bet Rafa would be Nr 1 on this list :D
Well the answer is simple. 20 gs, 99 titles, 310 weeks nr.1, 6 wt finals..any many more records..
Rod Laver 1. I think but everything Is OK
A month a title times three. Four titles a year is a title a trimester.
Novak Djokovic GOAT
This is my order
10- Andre Agassi
9- Ivan Lendl
8- Jimmy Connors
7- John McEnroe
6- Novak Djokovic
5- Bjorn Borg
4- Pete Sampras
3- Rafael Nadal
2-Rod Laver
1- Roger Federer
Roger Federer rules 1:federer, 2:naldal 3: laver 4: sampras 5: djokovic 6: borg 7: lendl 8: agassi 9: connors 10:mcenroe
I don't particularly like Novak ( especially when he best Roger in WB finals) but 6th place for him, behind Borj and Pete? That's a joke
Novak is in the top 3 this is rigged. His mentality and cool under pressure even beats Federer on many levels Atleast after the 2010 season. Nadal I think is the best ever the way he’s fought through injuries and still won majors and tournaments despite playing through that pain tells me he is and he’s beaten the the top 5 guys playing through immense knee pain.
Djokovic 6th; are you out of your mind??? And Fed, Novak, and Rafa should be next to each other
Novak Djokovic is the best tennis plater in the world.
Djokovic should be at Number 3...he won majors in the reign of Nadal & Federer.. which is unbelievable...Sometimes I think he is even better than Nadal.
Nadal is the best ever.
UNDOUBTEDLY FEDERER IS THE GREATEST MEN'S TENNIS PLAYER OF ALL TIME
Nole 6? haha What a about now that he has won 3 consecutive grand slams again?
Sampras would have smashed Laver on grass!
novak no1, roger no2, nadal no3.
Novak 6... kkkkkk
Nadal is the best
Novak top 3
y el Chino Rios wn
juojo jiji quien?
hahahahahaha, Novak number 6 ??????????
pete?
What a joke.....nooobody goes in front of Pete.......it is not EVEN tough call...........not even close.......someone here is blind or drunk to say no on that..
Nobody goes in front of Pete? Raf and Roger have both won not only more majors than Pete, but they have also won far more non-major tournaments than Pete. And Raf and Roger faced far stronger competition than Sampras. And Raf and Roger won on every major surface. They are complete players that can win on any surface. Pete was not a complete player. He was a specialist that played well on certain surfaces but the fact that he never won a match beyond the quarterfinals at Roland Garros shows that the highest he could possibly be in this list is 3rd or 4th. There is no way anyone can give serious consideration to him being 1st or 2nd. 1st and 2nd belong to Federer and Nadal. They have EARNED it.
Sampras was a great and dominant player during the 90s but if he had to face Federer, Nadal, and Djokavic at their best then Sampras would have won far fewer tournaments and no one would even whisper that he was the best of all time.. And that is a fact.
De Selby Underrated comment
Perfect List ! But Boris Becker is missing !
Get laver out of there!
After 2022 this video will be so incorrect!