i definitely believe Buddha was more related to Vedic literature then Atheism when the very title means enlightened one what atheist speaks of enlightenment? leads others on path to it he said do not believe but seek truth. in a time where muslim attack was everywhere it makes sense to deny existence of any God but Allah
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. It's important to acknowledge that the historical and philosophical context of Buddhism is quite distinct. While Buddha's teachings emerged from a Vedic cultural background, his path differs significantly from the theistic and ritual aspects of the Vedas. Buddha emphasized personal experience and the search for truth through mindfulness and meditation, which is more aligned with a practical approach to life rather than belief in a deity. Buddhism is often considered non-theistic rather than atheistic. The concept of "enlightenment" in Buddhism is about self-realization and understanding the nature of reality, rather than seeking a divine truth. The Buddha encouraged people not to accept teachings on blind faith but to test them against their own experience, which is why his advice to "seek truth" is so central. Regarding the comment on historical conflicts, it's important to be cautious in making assumptions about religious motivations based on later historical events. Buddhism emerged long before any encounters with Islam, and its denial of a creator god has more to do with the philosophical foundations of the Buddha's teachings rather than any reaction to specific religious groups. Thanks again for contributing your perspective! It’s always valuable to engage with these complex ideas in a thoughtful manner.
Yes, the Upanishads are older than the Buddha's teachings: Upanishads The Upanishads are philosophical-religious texts of Hinduism that were compiled between 700 and 500 BCE. The two oldest Upanishads are considered the most important. Buddha's teachings Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism, was born in 563 BCE. Buddhism originated in India and is one of the world's largest religions. The Upanishads are believed to have originated as oral traditions of ascetics, who wrote them down in the Vedas between the fifth and second centuries BCE. The Upanishads may have influenced Buddhism, but Buddhist texts portray the Buddha as rejecting Upanishadic ideas as "pernicious views"
Thank you so much for your insightful explanation! I really appreciate your deep understanding of both the Upanishads and the Buddha's teachings. Your detailed breakdown of the historical timeline and the potential influence of the Upanishads on Buddhism is very enlightening. Thanks again for sharing this knowledge!
There is only Sanatan dharma no twists in the plot soon you will see everything will come back to being Sanatani , its a way of life and those who do not accept it will perish this is the Truth Jai Shree Madhaba Jai Jagannath 🙏 ❤️
The Buddha did not argue that gods do not exist, but he did reject the idea of a creator god. Buddhism is generally considered a non-theistic religion, meaning it does not include the belief in a monotheistic creator deity. Buddhist teachings state that gods, or devas, are not creators or eternal beings, but they can live very long lives. Buddhist philosophers have argued that belief in an eternal god is a distraction for those seeking enlightenment. The Buddha also introduced the concept of anattā, which is the idea that there is no soul tying the cycle of rebirths.
It's interesting how stories and ideas can sometimes overlap between cultures and traditions. Both the Jataka tales and the Ramayana have deep roots in ancient storytelling, and while they share certain themes, they each offer unique perspectives. Rather than thinking in terms of 'stealing,' it might be more about how interconnected human narratives are. Every tradition contributes to a larger cultural tapestry
@@BuddhaStillness okay, when Hindus include Buddha to their religion it's, identity theft, but if the Buddhist does the identity theft of lord Rama, contribute to cultural tapestry, it's called being a hypocrite.
@@ZokarNalayak Thank you for your comment and for sharing your perspective. It’s important to recognize that discussions about religious figures and their roles in different traditions can be sensitive. When figures like Buddha or Lord Rama are included in different religious or cultural contexts, it’s often a reflection of how complex and interconnected these traditions have been historically. Rather than seeing it as "identity theft," some might argue that it reflects the way cultures influence and borrow from one another over time. However, I understand that these dynamics can feel personal and even contentious for those deeply connected to their faith. It’s essential to approach these conversations with respect for both traditions and individuals. Thank you for engaging in this conversation. Your input adds to a richer understanding of these delicate issues.
@@BuddhaStillness It’s incredibly hypocritical for you to accuse Hindus of undermining Buddhism by including Buddha in our scriptures when Buddhism itself has done the same by reworking Hindu stories through the Jataka tales. Let’s talk about how stories like the Dasaratha Jataka downplay Rama and Dasharatha, turning a divine avatar of Vishnu into just a wise king. You’re quick to criticize Hindus for including Buddha, but conveniently ignore how Buddhist texts have undermined and appropriated Hindu figures for centuries. Look at the Vessantara Jataka, which mirrors the story of King Harishchandra, stripping away its spiritual depth and turning it into a mere moral lesson for Buddhism’s narrative. Even deities like Indra and Brahma are portrayed as subservient to the Buddha, downplaying their Hindu significance. So, before you talk about cultural "stealing," recognize the blatant hypocrisy here. You can’t accuse Hindus of appropriation while Buddhism has been doing the same thing for centuries with Hindu stories, gods, and figures.
i definitely believe Buddha was more related to Vedic literature then Atheism when the very title means enlightened one what atheist speaks of enlightenment? leads others on path to it he said do not believe but seek truth. in a time where muslim attack was everywhere it makes sense to deny existence of any God but Allah
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. It's important to acknowledge that the historical and philosophical context of Buddhism is quite distinct. While Buddha's teachings emerged from a Vedic cultural background, his path differs significantly from the theistic and ritual aspects of the Vedas. Buddha emphasized personal experience and the search for truth through mindfulness and meditation, which is more aligned with a practical approach to life rather than belief in a deity.
Buddhism is often considered non-theistic rather than atheistic. The concept of "enlightenment" in Buddhism is about self-realization and understanding the nature of reality, rather than seeking a divine truth. The Buddha encouraged people not to accept teachings on blind faith but to test them against their own experience, which is why his advice to "seek truth" is so central.
Regarding the comment on historical conflicts, it's important to be cautious in making assumptions about religious motivations based on later historical events. Buddhism emerged long before any encounters with Islam, and its denial of a creator god has more to do with the philosophical foundations of the Buddha's teachings rather than any reaction to specific religious groups.
Thanks again for contributing your perspective! It’s always valuable to engage with these complex ideas in a thoughtful manner.
Yes, the Upanishads are older than the Buddha's teachings:
Upanishads
The Upanishads are philosophical-religious texts of Hinduism that were compiled between 700 and 500 BCE. The two oldest Upanishads are considered the most important.
Buddha's teachings
Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism, was born in 563 BCE. Buddhism originated in India and is one of the world's largest religions.
The Upanishads are believed to have originated as oral traditions of ascetics, who wrote them down in the Vedas between the fifth and second centuries BCE. The Upanishads may have influenced Buddhism, but Buddhist texts portray the Buddha as rejecting Upanishadic ideas as "pernicious views"
Thank you so much for your insightful explanation! I really appreciate your deep understanding of both the Upanishads and the Buddha's teachings. Your detailed breakdown of the historical timeline and the potential influence of the Upanishads on Buddhism is very enlightening. Thanks again for sharing this knowledge!
There is only Sanatan dharma no twists in the plot soon you will see everything will come back to being Sanatani , its a way of life and those who do not accept it will perish this is the Truth Jai Shree Madhaba Jai Jagannath 🙏 ❤️
God himself is saying that there's no god....!
The Buddha did not argue that gods do not exist, but he did reject the idea of a creator god. Buddhism is generally considered a non-theistic religion, meaning it does not include the belief in a monotheistic creator deity.
Buddhist teachings state that gods, or devas, are not creators or eternal beings, but they can live very long lives. Buddhist philosophers have argued that belief in an eternal god is a distraction for those seeking enlightenment.
The Buddha also introduced the concept of anattā, which is the idea that there is no soul tying the cycle of rebirths.
Beautiful bro
That's the claims work on both sides even buddhist stole Jatak katha from Ramayana.😂
It's interesting how stories and ideas can sometimes overlap between cultures and traditions.
Both the Jataka tales and the Ramayana have deep roots in ancient storytelling, and while they share certain themes, they each offer unique perspectives.
Rather than thinking in terms of 'stealing,' it might be more about how interconnected human narratives are. Every tradition contributes to a larger cultural tapestry
@@BuddhaStillness okay, when Hindus include Buddha to their religion it's, identity theft, but if the Buddhist does the identity theft of lord Rama, contribute to cultural tapestry, it's called being a hypocrite.
@@ZokarNalayak Thank you for your comment and for sharing your perspective. It’s important to recognize that discussions about religious figures and their roles in different traditions can be sensitive. When figures like Buddha or Lord Rama are included in different religious or cultural contexts, it’s often a reflection of how complex and interconnected these traditions have been historically.
Rather than seeing it as "identity theft," some might argue that it reflects the way cultures influence and borrow from one another over time. However, I understand that these dynamics can feel personal and even contentious for those deeply connected to their faith. It’s essential to approach these conversations with respect for both traditions and individuals.
Thank you for engaging in this conversation. Your input adds to a richer understanding of these delicate issues.
@@BuddhaStillness It’s incredibly hypocritical for you to accuse Hindus of undermining Buddhism by including Buddha in our scriptures when Buddhism itself has done the same by reworking Hindu stories through the Jataka tales. Let’s talk about how stories like the Dasaratha Jataka downplay Rama and Dasharatha, turning a divine avatar of Vishnu into just a wise king. You’re quick to criticize Hindus for including Buddha, but conveniently ignore how Buddhist texts have undermined and appropriated Hindu figures for centuries.
Look at the Vessantara Jataka, which mirrors the story of King Harishchandra, stripping away its spiritual depth and turning it into a mere moral lesson for Buddhism’s narrative. Even deities like Indra and Brahma are portrayed as subservient to the Buddha, downplaying their Hindu significance.
So, before you talk about cultural "stealing," recognize the blatant hypocrisy here. You can’t accuse Hindus of appropriation while Buddhism has been doing the same thing for centuries with Hindu stories, gods, and figures.
❤❤❤❤❤