The ability to think of and write this shows how great classical composers were. To be able to marry all the instruments to make such a sound is incredible.
I can still remember when we all had to write music that way. Manuscript paper was *really* expensive too, you had an interest in sorting out your ideas before putting too much down on paper.
This is the most beautiful and brilliant masterpiece of all time. I heard it first when I was a piano student in my teens and it grabbed me. It’s totally amazing. I have never learnt it, but to learn this is indeed a lifelong dream. I’d be happy if I could play the first movement. It takes a great deal of stamina.
+Piotr T. It's not only my favourite too (among strong opposition!) it's also the one most true to the score. The slightest changes in tempi are observed exactly as the score indicates. It's wonderful and thank you for taking the time and trouble to put this up... I would have struggled!
Which edition of the score (2-piano arrangement) did you use ? I am surprised to find at bar 253 (8:21) the first octaves doted and the staccato marking. On my score (edition Eulenburg full score) there is not such indication. I checked also the Jurgenson's edition and Tchaikovsky 's autograph full score and I did not find that either. Incidentally van Cliburn plays those octaves staccato and I find this is the weak part of his reading. This passage is very dramatic, a violent struggle between the piano and the orchestra, and the staccato playing robs the intensity of this climax. Richter/Karajan or Argerich/Dutoit (both on DG) for instance are far more impressive in this octaves passage. Also at bar 445 (13:36), he follows the (wrong) tradition to start the staggered notes piano when they should be fortissimo. Richter does the same, but not Argerich who follows respectfully the score. I would also add that there are many more indications of tempo nuances on the full score than on the two piano arrangement.
You're quite right, of course. Tchaikovsky made several changes to the score over the years and what we hear now is not the one which the composer said he would publish after Rubinstein's first and cruel assessment. The Eulenberg score has several errors, especially in articulation, and is at variance with the Jurgenson edition which, in my view, is more likely to be accurate. But I do take your points, made by a clearly knowledgeable man and I shall research more closely. I just added a post at the start of this thread making an even more dramatic variance with the score as we now know it. Please take the time to read that. (It was probably the work of Edmund Landsdorfer, a British pianist and a well known champion of the work.)
Estudié piano 7 años, el nivel elemental y éste concierto es el más bello de todos los conciertos de piano que existen. Viví en Rusia 🇷🇺 y disfruté de esa magia!!!
Beautifully played! Only great Tchaikovsky could seduce with such a theme and then get down to business. He tells a story. The master's unique construction is why we are able to realize our personal story thru his.
tiago80006 Those werent trumpets... Edit: I hear the trumpets now, I thought he meant the descending notes right after the descending pisno notes played by the strings
haha thought the exact same thing! kept hearing these little poots of high-pitched brass in my right headphone and im glad someone else has mentioned it
After all these years it has finally dawned upon me. This concerto is about ardent love no matter the consequences trying to persuade those in charge to give those in love a chance for acceptance. How brave, inspired, was its creator genius Mr. Tchaikovsky. His work will endure forever. Tchaikovsky depicted human longing. My hero.
I can't believe this was ripped apart by critics in his day... Mostly for breaking the rigid form of a concerto... During the romantic period... Yeahhh... Doesn't make much sense to me...
I think it was mainly Nikolai Rubinstein who disliked it and he even excused later. As far as i know this was pretty much the piece he had his break through with.
I'd just woke up ang open youtube then seeing this in my recommendation i clicked on this then this gave me an energy to act as an orchestra conductor out of my bed in an immaginary orchestra
There is a new version of this piece, recorded by Kirill Gertsein, which is the one purported to be in the conductor's music stand at Tchaikovsky's last concert - the one where the composer himself conducted the first performance of the last symphony. I say purported, but the evidence comes from Polina Vaidman, the long-time curator of the Tchaikovsky museum at Klin. I urge any devotees of Tchaikovsky to get a hold of a copy. The main change comes just as the piano enters: Instead of the three crashing chords, it appears Tchaikovsky's original (and revised) version has the piano playing only the first chord as written here, the following two played as arpeggiated chords. It's almost Schumaneque in tone and, as I said, it was the only one Tchaikovsky knew. Interesting to geeks only, I know, but some of us are quite happy to be geeks!
I have not seen the new scholarly edition of the concerto based on Tchaikovsky's own 1879 score published recently by the Tchaikovsky Museum and Archive in Klin. But I got Kirill Gerstein's CD and I read his very interesting comments. In fact there are 4 main changes with the third edition. One proposed by Tchaikovsky himself is the cut of 12 bars in the last movement. Obviously Tchaikovsky was not happy with what he called "the accursed place", and he thought it would be shorter and better with his alteration. For the three others we are not sure if they were authorised (and even known) by the composer as the third version was published after his death. The change of tempo in the middle of the second movement from Allegro vivace assai to Prestissimo was disproved by Taneyev in a letter to Igumnov in 1912. For him Prestissimo was too fast. I must say that I agree with him. I can't see what it brings to play this part as fast as possible ! Fortunately some pianists have the good taste to play it Allegro vivace assai. The change at bars 250 and 251 in the last movement (the repeated G-F octaves by octave jumps) is not striking. The most noticeable is of course the change of the chords right at the beginning of the first movement. Was it better before or now, is hard to say. I think it depends of the adopted tempo. If the tempo is rather fast, the struck chords sound better. If the tempo is rather slow the arpeggiated chords sound as well. Unfortunately I think that Kirill Gerstein plays them a bit too fast in his recording and they sound thin (Berman or Lowenthal in the 1875 version sound better with a slightly slower tempo). In fact the differences between the second and third version are not so important and I can understand why the pianists continue to play the posthumous version whatever the uncertainties. I would add that it is not because Tchaikovsky used the second edition at his last concert, that it is a proof that he did not approved the third version as we know it. The third edition was not published yet, and of course the soloist Adele Aus der Ohe did not know it.
No, I agree with you; because Tchaikovsky used the third published edition at his last concert does not mean that he especially endorsed it. But it does seem to be more likely, given that other versions were by then freely available. I am starting to write a blog on Tchaikovsky's like and music: tchaikovskylifeandworks.wordpress.com/ Would you please consider writing an article (or two!) for the site? You may choose your own subject(s) and your words will not be edited. Please bear in mind that this is a new site and that there are few articles there at the moment. But I am looking for knowledgeable people, with whom I may not agree, to make contributions. I did interview Stephen Hough and there are many other interviews in line for publication. Would you please consider it? I would be so grateful...
P.S. Adele Aus der Ohe was Tchaikovsky's favourite interpreter for his concerto. Sadly, she left no reminiscences but she was, according to the composer, sublime and unsurpassed in her understanding of the piece. This is one of the reasons why the much more feminine chords of the Gerstein edition may be more persuasive as to his intentions...
As you know, Adele Aus der Ohe was one of Liszt's favorite pupils. He liked her and said her touch was as soft as velvet and as strong as a man's. Funny enough was Tchaikovsky first reaction to her playing of the concerto. In his diary April 22nd (May 4th) 1891 he wrote : "I showed her various little nuances and delicate details, which - after yesterday's rehearsal - I considered necessary, in view of her powerful, clean, brilliant, but somewhat rough, style of playing". But after the concert he wrote April 27th (May 9th) : "My concerto went magnificently thanks to Aus der Ohe's brilliant interpretation". From the book "The life and letters of Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky" by Modest Tchaikovsky. I think this shows clearly what kind of interpretation Tchaikovsky liked for his first piano concerto.By the way, do you know why Tchaikovsky wrote "Andante non troppo e molto maestoso" for the 2 piano score, and "Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso" for the full score ?
On the last point, I don't. Please, do tell... You would serious;y be very welcome to ...contribute to my site... tchaikovskylifeandworks.wordpress.com/ Pick a topic and I'll leave it untouched. O may not always agree with what you write you (and may say so!) but you really have so much to offer. Will you consider it...?
I didn't realize this was Cliburn until I had listened to the whole thing and then read it in the summary. I was thinking as I was listening how effortless the performance sounded. So many pianists might play the notes perfectly, but you can "sense" the struggle. Before this my favorite was Yuja Wang's, but I think I like this interpretation a little more.
Que gran versión de uno de los 5 conciertos para piano mas asombrosos de la historia de la música. Un pianista indiscutido en una producción antológica.
@@foose56 yo diria que el concierto de Moritz Moszkowski op 59 en Mi mayor (mi favorito, y tambien te recomiendo escuchar su primer concierto el op.03 en si menor, que lo tocó el a 2 pianos con Liszt, que se creía perdido y se redescubrió en 2011 en una biblioteca en Francia, su Reestreno fue en 2013), el concierto no.1 de Chopin, el 2do concierto de Rachmaninoff, y por ultimo diria que el concierto de Bortkiewicz, no se cual de los 3 que hizo, porque son fascinantes, y su historia es increible, como sobrevivio a las 2 guerras mundiales y lo narra en una carta como milagrosamente se salva 3 veces. Tambien me encanta el concierto de Gabriel Pierne.
Guy won the inaugural Tchaikovsky competition in Soviet Union during the Cold War. His playing in the final round in that competition received a standing ovation from the Soviet crowd.
Me: 0:00 - 0:11 sounds really familiar. After a few minutes of searching my phone’s music library, Susumu Yokota sampled that in the song Flaming Love and Destiny.
We now know that this is not the version Tchaikovsky wrote! The Tchaikovsky Research Foundation has edited a new 2015 urtext version based on the composer's final thoughts, not the accretions foisted on the score by students and virtuosos. The pianist Kirill Gerstein has called the thunderous opening chords 'Soviet Bombs,' especially because Tchaikovsky never wrote them. But of course they are effective and thrilling!
I just had a breakfast listening to this piece. It was the most epic breakfast of my life
Nice! Hope you enjoyed!
IKR
Same dude!
so you ate breakfast for 20 minutes?
Me too. Oh my Gosh, same. I listen this before I go to school
Classical music is the best thing that has happened to humanity. I am 19 years old and I listen to it all the time.
It is wonderful 🥰
Its dying
@@misterpenguine2869you’ll die before it dies
good for you young man. Huggies )
@@misterpenguine2869 In your nightmares.
If only the orchestra could always be this competent and expressive. The intro is especially well done.
I guess after a while they grow bored..😒
I felt the intro felt a bit more jazzy... like more expressive less by the book. A really good play
I don't think anyone can beat Yevgeny Kissin, Herbert von Karajan and the Berliner Philarmoniker's version
The ability to think of and write this shows how great classical composers were. To be able to marry all the instruments to make such a sound is incredible.
*cries in viola*
*romantic
12:15 I love the call and response between the piano and orchestra 😍😍
Originally handwritten with ink on paper. Just to remind us.
Hattakiri yess
#BleedingFingers
and then Rubinstein comes in and calls this an unplayable bullcrap - blasphemy
Obviously... compositors doesn’t have a printery on their houses...
I can still remember when we all had to write music that way. Manuscript paper was *really* expensive too, you had an interest in sorting out your ideas before putting too much down on paper.
Emiliano Hernández - "Compositors" *worked* in printeries! But your comment is true if you mean "composers".
20:09 - 20:25 has always been one of my all-time favorite music passages since the day I heard it when I was 10 years old. Just magical!
I can totally say the same thing. Incredible music and genius.
all a life several masterpieces
That masterful buildup from 9:57 straight through to 11:19 is one of the best in history.
1:48
Tchaikovsky: Ok so do an arpeggio on every chord except the last one
Pianist: hmm how about no arpeggio but I'll do one on the last
There’s an arpeggio an every chord, it’s just really quick
As a reasonably competent amateur pianist I am astonished at how anyone can master such a complicated piece .
5:30 Very brave and beautiful
15:18 can't describe how beautiful this part is. I love it soi so Soo muxh
Tchaikovsky trademark 0:01~0:07
So flavorful tho!
Tchaikovsky trademark 00:00-20:45
My favourite part: 0:01 - 20:41
Mine is until the end of the third movement
Favourite Tchaicosvky’s composition
The physical score alone is a work of beauty.
This is the most beautiful and brilliant masterpiece of all time. I heard it first when I was a piano student in my teens and it grabbed me. It’s totally amazing. I have never learnt it, but to learn this is indeed a lifelong dream. I’d be happy if I could play the first movement. It takes a great deal of stamina.
For me the most beautiful would be 17:00 you can hear the 7th blending in to the 1st so beautifully
just read the wikipedia about this concerto and have a laugh on how badass tchai was
Antony Tyurin It's Van Cliburn on piano and Kiril Kondrashin conducting. It's really amazing, for me the definitive one.
+Piotr T. It's not only my favourite too (among strong opposition!) it's also the one most true to the score. The slightest changes in tempi are observed exactly as the score indicates. It's wonderful and thank you for taking the time and trouble to put this up... I would have struggled!
+ComposerInUK This one is decent but I've always favored the Rubinstein-Mitropoulos rendition.
Which edition of the score (2-piano arrangement) did you use ? I am surprised to find at bar 253 (8:21) the first octaves doted and the staccato marking. On my score (edition Eulenburg full score) there is not such indication. I checked also the
Jurgenson's edition and Tchaikovsky 's autograph full score and I did not find
that either. Incidentally van Cliburn plays those octaves staccato and I find this is the weak part of his reading. This passage is very dramatic, a violent struggle between the piano and the orchestra, and the staccato playing robs the intensity of this climax. Richter/Karajan or Argerich/Dutoit (both on DG) for instance are far more impressive in this octaves passage.
Also at bar 445 (13:36), he follows the (wrong) tradition to start the staggered notes piano when they should be fortissimo. Richter does the same, but not Argerich who follows respectfully the score. I would also add that there are many more indications of tempo nuances on the full score than on the two piano arrangement.
Oh! Never Rubinstein for me. Horovitz, perhaps but I hope we can disagree honourably!
You're quite right, of course. Tchaikovsky made several changes to the score over the years and what we hear now is not the one which the composer said he would publish after Rubinstein's first and cruel assessment. The Eulenberg score has several errors, especially in articulation, and is at variance with the Jurgenson edition which, in my view, is more likely to be accurate. But I do take your points, made by a clearly knowledgeable man and I shall research more closely. I just added a post at the start of this thread making an even more dramatic variance with the score as we now know it. Please take the time to read that. (It was probably the work of Edmund Landsdorfer, a British pianist and a well known champion of the work.)
One of the best beginnings for a concerto ever written!!!
I love this man so much....
I love me too. Sadly, not everyone does😔
Estudié piano 7 años, el nivel elemental y éste concierto es el más bello de todos los conciertos de piano que existen. Viví en Rusia 🇷🇺 y disfruté de esa magia!!!
I played this at a concert with my piano teacher a few years ago. Incredible experience.
van cliburn was a genius!.....his interpretation of this concerto is sublime and among the best!...........a standing ovation!
Beautifully played! Only great Tchaikovsky could
seduce with such a theme and then get down to business.
He tells a story. The master's unique construction is why we are able to realize our personal story thru his.
Exactly, I agree!
The finest concerto ever written
SO MUCH CHILLS--- blanket and hot chocolate recomended!!!
Nay, rather prosecco and a hot lover
This will be my Concerto for next years Concerto competition. I’m so excited. I will be learning all 3 movements.
Tobias Lloyd I will if I win the concerto competition. This year I’m competing with Mozart’s piano concerto no 20.
@@michaelazimmerman8321 no one cares , you're sad, You can't write your own music, and think music is a competition
@@michaelazimmerman8321 how it went ?
Stupenda esecuzione.La migliore mai sentita.Orchestra e solista perfetti.
Un grazie a Piotr T. per l'ottimo caricamento.
I love these great opus with the scrolling scores. When I was a teenager I wish I had been the pianist.
The feels in the beginning omg!!!💕💕💕💕💕
i listen to this instead of bretts lofi
k
Why not both
@@CardinalTetra at the same time
Qin Lin bretts lofi sucks, people like euphoria have no standards
euphoria @euphoria
2:25 those are the most random trumpet notes ever haha
tiago80006 Those werent trumpets... Edit: I hear the trumpets now, I thought he meant the descending notes right after the descending pisno notes played by the strings
haha thought the exact same thing! kept hearing these little poots of high-pitched brass in my right headphone and im glad someone else has mentioned it
iae filhao.
no they arent they show the listener the harmoik switches they are kind of a signal
XD
After all these years it has finally dawned upon me. This concerto is about ardent love no matter the consequences trying to persuade those in charge to give those in love a chance for acceptance.
How brave, inspired, was its creator genius Mr. Tchaikovsky.
His work will endure forever.
Tchaikovsky depicted human longing.
My hero.
Steve Hinnenkamp you don’t know that.
How exactly did you reach this conclusion?
Beautifull.
Agreed
Beautiful* Idiot :v
@@daveontheskies hey, give him some slack, he's Hungarian:-)
@@thatsteinwaykid xd
@@daveontheskies ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I can't believe this was ripped apart by critics in his day... Mostly for breaking the rigid form of a concerto... During the romantic period... Yeahhh... Doesn't make much sense to me...
It soon became an endless masterpiece.
I could see how they disliked it, if I'm being utterly honest. Still fantastic.
I think it was mainly Nikolai Rubinstein who disliked it and he even excused later. As far as i know this was pretty much the piece he had his break through with.
It is very unusual if you think about it. An obvious example is the beginning which is bold and radical - must have sounded bizarre.
a bit like the way Bohemian Rhapsody was initially slated
This piece started my life. I started playing the piano at 4 because of this majestic piece. Till today erm........../cries/
1:53 Pyotr, what is ya doin'?
It's 4 AM and I'm alone in my home and I didn't know that making sunny side up was this epic with T'chaikovsky.
I'd just woke up ang open youtube then seeing this in my recommendation i clicked on this then this gave me an energy to act as an orchestra conductor out of my bed in an immaginary orchestra
I am clapping to a RUclips video... 👏👏👏
*Magica composizione, che amo moltissimo !!!* (Grazie, Piotr T. !)
I remembered hearing a 16 bit version of this in an old NES.
Helped lead to my discover of this song's name.
City Connection was the game.
Спасибо Чайковскому за такую музыку 💖 и спасибо автору ролика за "партируту" 👍
Bunu zamanında ilk dinleyenler arasında o kadar çok olmak isterdim ki konçerto dinlemeye gidiyorsunuz ve böyle bir eserle büyüleniyorsunuz...
There is a new version of this piece, recorded by Kirill Gertsein, which is the one purported to be in the conductor's music stand at Tchaikovsky's last concert - the one where the composer himself conducted the first performance of the last symphony. I say purported, but the evidence comes from Polina Vaidman, the long-time curator of the Tchaikovsky museum at Klin. I urge any devotees of Tchaikovsky to get a hold of a copy. The main change comes just as the piano enters: Instead of the three crashing chords, it appears Tchaikovsky's original (and revised) version has the piano playing only the first chord as written here, the following two played as arpeggiated chords. It's almost Schumaneque in tone and, as I said, it was the only one Tchaikovsky knew. Interesting to geeks only, I know, but some of us are quite happy to be geeks!
I have not seen the new scholarly edition of the concerto based on Tchaikovsky's own 1879 score published recently by the Tchaikovsky Museum and Archive in Klin. But I got Kirill Gerstein's CD and I read his very interesting comments.
In fact there are 4 main changes with the third edition. One proposed by Tchaikovsky himself is the cut of 12 bars in the last movement. Obviously Tchaikovsky was not happy with what he called "the accursed place", and he
thought it would be shorter and better with his alteration. For the three
others we are not sure if they were authorised (and even known) by the
composer as the third version was published after his death.
The change of tempo in the middle of the second movement from Allegro vivace assai to Prestissimo was disproved by Taneyev in a letter to Igumnov in 1912. For him Prestissimo was too fast. I must say that I agree with him. I can't see what it brings to play this part as fast as possible ! Fortunately some pianists have the good taste to play it Allegro vivace assai.
The change at bars 250 and 251 in the last movement (the repeated G-F octaves by octave jumps) is not striking.
The most noticeable is of course the change of the chords right at the beginning of the first movement. Was it better before or now, is hard to say. I think it depends of the adopted tempo. If the tempo is rather fast, the struck chords sound better. If the tempo is rather slow the arpeggiated chords sound as well. Unfortunately I think that Kirill Gerstein plays them a bit too fast in his recording and they sound thin (Berman or Lowenthal in the 1875 version sound better with a slightly slower tempo).
In fact the differences between the second and third version are not so important and I can understand why the pianists continue to play the posthumous version whatever the uncertainties.
I would add that it is not because Tchaikovsky used the second edition at his last concert, that it is a proof that he did not approved the third version as we know it. The third edition was not published yet, and of course the soloist Adele Aus der Ohe did not know it.
No, I agree with you; because Tchaikovsky used the third published edition at his last concert does not mean that he especially endorsed it. But it does seem to be more likely, given that other versions were by then freely available.
I am starting to write a blog on Tchaikovsky's like and music: tchaikovskylifeandworks.wordpress.com/
Would you please consider writing an article (or two!) for the site? You may choose your own subject(s) and your words will not be edited. Please bear in mind that this is a new site and that there are few articles there at the moment. But I am looking for knowledgeable people, with whom I may not agree, to make contributions. I did interview Stephen Hough and there are many other interviews in line for publication. Would you please consider it? I would be so grateful...
P.S. Adele Aus der Ohe was Tchaikovsky's favourite interpreter for his concerto. Sadly, she left no reminiscences but she was, according to the composer, sublime and unsurpassed in her understanding of the piece. This is one of the reasons why the much more feminine chords of the Gerstein edition may be more persuasive as to his intentions...
As you know, Adele Aus der Ohe was one of Liszt's favorite pupils. He liked her and said her touch was as soft as velvet and as strong as a man's. Funny enough was Tchaikovsky first reaction to her playing of the concerto. In his diary April 22nd (May 4th) 1891 he wrote : "I showed her various little nuances and delicate details, which - after yesterday's rehearsal - I considered necessary, in view of her powerful, clean, brilliant, but somewhat rough, style of playing". But after the concert he wrote April 27th (May 9th) : "My concerto went magnificently thanks to Aus der Ohe's brilliant interpretation". From the book "The life and letters of Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky" by Modest Tchaikovsky. I think this shows clearly what kind of interpretation Tchaikovsky liked for his first piano concerto.By the way, do you know why Tchaikovsky wrote "Andante non troppo e molto maestoso" for the 2 piano score, and "Allegro non troppo e molto maestoso" for the full score ?
On the last point, I don't. Please, do tell... You would serious;y be very welcome to ...contribute to my site... tchaikovskylifeandworks.wordpress.com/
Pick a topic and I'll leave it untouched. O may not always agree with what you write you (and may say so!) but you really have so much to offer. Will you consider it...?
Pyotr, My man! What's up!
Hey😝
#Bromance
yall get the best youtube comment award
Just absolutly perfect ... nothing to say
Haha thank you
Música. Compositor. Regente. Pianista. Inacreditável. Sobrenatural. Espetacular condução e interpretação. FENOMENAL PIANISTA.
10:47-11:00 just kills me. Love it!
This music make my life colorful
Wonderful; thank you!
corinthian Poor Tchaikovsky, what a genius !
Great music.One of my favorite piano concerto:)
YES and Greigs too
I didn't realize this was Cliburn until I had listened to the whole thing and then read it in the summary. I was thinking as I was listening how effortless the performance sounded. So many pianists might play the notes perfectly, but you can "sense" the struggle. Before this my favorite was Yuja Wang's, but I think I like this interpretation a little more.
Que gran versión de uno de los 5 conciertos para piano mas asombrosos de la historia de la música. Un pianista indiscutido en una producción antológica.
Cuales son los otros 4?
@@foose56 yo diria que el concierto de Moritz Moszkowski op 59 en Mi mayor (mi favorito, y tambien te recomiendo escuchar su primer concierto el op.03 en si menor, que lo tocó el a 2 pianos con Liszt, que se creía perdido y se redescubrió en 2011 en una biblioteca en Francia, su Reestreno fue en 2013), el concierto no.1 de Chopin, el 2do concierto de Rachmaninoff, y por ultimo diria que el concierto de Bortkiewicz, no se cual de los 3 que hizo, porque son fascinantes, y su historia es increible, como sobrevivio a las 2 guerras mundiales y lo narra en una carta como milagrosamente se salva 3 veces. Tambien me encanta el concierto de Gabriel Pierne.
11:02 the bass note is definitely a Bb but it's written as Ab.
Perhaps it is a transposing instrument? Idk if that's how they write it in closed score
11:18 - 12:10 is the best part. Harmonically, it is so forward-looking.
PeculateMusic Indeed, the beginning of that excerpt reminds me of Scriabin
haunting moment. and an incredible transition. beautiful.
Shaugath Dey Could you recommend me some Scriabin pieces that sound like this, I love it so much
@@mintchoco5640 Sonata 6. But it’s in a different league entirely than Tchaikovsky 1…
I am currently learning this concerto😃
4 weeks later now...?
@Milan Duchevski It is great！i finished learning the whole concerto！
@@picante28 Yeah now i already planning this piecE for my competition！
How long have you been learning this concerto?! I can barely learn a 5 page accompaniment
This is really amazing 🎹🙂
This is my favorite Concerto.....I have a few more levels to reach it....I guess.......I'll work harder.......Ugh......This looks so difficult!!
It's in your head sometimes it will just flow naturally as you learn it
This is my favorite piece in general. I hope I can play it, in a couple years or so...
Did you reach the level yet.
Did you reach the level?
marche 2.0 what about that sonata?
This piece is everything it needs to be!
Both of my parents had a record that had this piece on it.
8:05-8:11 is absolutely the best part of the piece😎
WOW! THIS WAS SUPERB!!!!
wow. This guy was indeed really talented.
Yes.
Guy won the inaugural Tchaikovsky competition in Soviet Union during the Cold War. His playing in the final round in that competition received a standing ovation from the Soviet crowd.
Muito tempo atrás, assisti uma novela, onde a introdução era essa música maravilhosa. Demorei anos pra reencontrar-la. Amo demais! 🎶💕🇧🇷
I like how Tchaikovsky gave up on bar lines at around 1:50
Yes, that is very neat-- but not unusual for extended cadenza passages.
have you ever seen the score to a piece by Liszt?
Tim Madden 배리굿
A cadenza section is usually devoid of bars and musical timing. The notes are too crazy to fit into bars. XD
"I don't believe in measures"
~Concerned theorist
the first minute of this and the first minute of queen's live aid set sound so familiar :p
Genius... I just cried my eyes out and I'm not even on my period ♥️
I love the ending!
My favorite part starts here, 7:24 🎹
Beautiful music. Thanks Lyn
I can see James Horner drew some inspiration from this concerto with, "Take Her Out To Sea, Murdock."
Wonderful music !!!!!!!!!!!
This is one of the pieces I like most!
And also Tchaikovsky's violin concerto in D XD
peter
what r u doin
*peter*
*STAHP*
ПЕТРЪ
НЕТ
*ПЕТРЪ*
*НЕТ*
C A N N O N S
The real fun begins @4:22
After listening to Argerich it sounds like his playing the climaxes in slow motion.
So true, she is 1 of the most amazing pianists, if not the best!
Only two pianists who can really kick ass on the octave work : Argerich and Horowitz.
@@pianoman551000 uh hamelin, alkan, kissin, lugansky,liszt
Van cliburn won Tchaijowsky contest in Russian while there's cold war!!!
@@p-y8210 cziffra too
I'm wondering how many people come to listen to classical music through video games?? it seems that many do!
7:23 歌うメロディ大好き
Me: 0:00 - 0:11 sounds really familiar.
After a few minutes of searching my phone’s music library, Susumu Yokota sampled that in the song Flaming Love and Destiny.
so beautiful
I love this part 0:52, glamourous. ❤️🔥
I can see where Rachmaninoff got his inspiration from.
Rachmaninoff practically worshipped Tchaikovsky
@@shosty575 Yeah, he was depressed for several months when Tchaikovsky suddenly died.
@@thesilvershining yeah. We got PC 2 after he came out of that depression.
@@shosty575 no the pc 2 came after the depression that was caused by the abysmal premiere of his symphony no.1
@@erikbreathes ahh. Now I remember.
We now know that this is not the version Tchaikovsky wrote! The Tchaikovsky Research Foundation has edited a new 2015 urtext version based on the composer's final thoughts, not the accretions foisted on the score by students and virtuosos. The pianist Kirill Gerstein has called the thunderous opening chords 'Soviet Bombs,' especially because Tchaikovsky never wrote them. But of course they are effective and thrilling!
Me falling down the stairs at 3:00 a.m and going to grab some snacks from the kitchen:
Lol
I couldn’t play piano that long
I wish I could play piano like him
I don't know why i love opera .at my age no one likes classic music.
@itsmekss ssh dont tell them, wait until they say something funnier
I love classical music, it's the main thing and can be the only thing i listen to ever.
Dude this no opera u idiot poop face go back to mommy
@@abhirambvs8818 jjkokh khkk ukuklu lukuk lukuli
AMAZING JOB
Tchaikovsky is perfectly equal to or even more than Mozart Bethoveen and Bach ....
The trumpets sound like they're still hungover from the traditional brass pre-concert pub crawl
thank you
Van Cliburn was a most wonderful pianist! AND American to boot! ~~~
19:19
Marvelous.
You Piotr Ilich Tchaikovsky... what did you ate when you were a Child?? 😂😂 such a great genius
Well, i ate many things..
This piece is masturful
The best song EVER
Une merveille...