Third row seats are never meant for full grown adult I don't think that was ever the intent. Since SUVs are replacing minivans with moms, the third rows have always been intented for kids. I don't know why car reviewers always says its not for the average adult. I personally like the Mazda CX9. For its safety and reliability.
I don't have a kid that I can put in the 3rd row to show the difference in space between these two cars and other 3-row SUVs that I've reviewed. So I try to sit back there. At least its consistent and hopefully people watching the video get a sense of how much space there actually is instead of just looking at an empty seat. Plus, I'm not the only one with at least 6 other adults friends. If a couple of them annoyed me one night, I'd make them sit in those seats as payback haha
I tested a bunch of other SUVs and went with a 22 CX-9 Carbon. Very happy with it thus far, but not very impressed with the MPGs. Really want to the see the new CX-90 and CX-9 with the Hybrid powertrain. I think then it would be so much more competitive
Great review, happy new subscriber here! Great choice on the comparison. Both are great vehicles, and it's pretty amazing the Mazda, as old as it is, still holds its own against a redesigned MDX. Cudos to Mazda!
I'm a little late but nice review. My wife is in the market for a compact-midsize suv after giving her '16 Accord to our daughter. The budget is $40k ($35K is ideal) and now that the CX-90 is out, I'm seeing some discounts on the CX-9 that are tempting. Previously I was looking at CRV, Kia Sportage (don't like the exterior styling), etc. The RDX is tempting but over our "desired" budget. She doesn't need the 3rd row so the size of the CX-9 isn't an issue. I know many car reviews pit vehicles in the same class when they compare... but now I find myself cross shopping a CX-9 with a CRV and it looks like the CX-9 Touring Plus is cheaper than the CRV Sport Touring Hybrid (US)! Decisions decisions... My new flaw is if the vehicle offers a better engine, it's usually the one I want and I stop considering the cheaper one. We did that with the Accord and got the Sport with the CVT... always wishing we went up to the 6 cylinder and automatic.
Glad you enjoyed my review! Funny you mention the CR-V Hybrid, it's my demo car this week. I like it but the Touring trim (which is the only trim that's available with the hybrid powertrain here in Canada) is expensive and it doesn't drive as nicely as the Mazda CX-9 does. But it is up there for comfort and fuel economy.
@@drivescene6747 probably MDX is more well rev symphonic engine because it's atmospheric and it's a V6 with more hp but CX 9 is more responsive because of the torque's output with the industry's unique dynamic pressure turbo and the sensation of turbine's spooling at lower rpm are so driving enjoyable!!! I wish I would drive the next powertrain config on the CX-90!!! Both runs in agile driveness but X5 is more sporty enthusiast and purist SUV! The Germans cars are more focused in driving Dynamics definitely.
You forgot to mention that the new MDX obviously stole many exterior design features from the CX-9. Suttle but there if you compare, and that,s a good thing IMO.
@@MGReviewsBlog OMG how can you not see it? Front end , rear end, side profile, front wind scoops and more. Like I said, it's subtle but Acura clearly used the CX-9 design for it's influence. The former MDX was a soccer mommy van. Now it looks forward leaning and aggressive like the CX-9
Why didn't you review the AWD Mazda CX-9? My wife has the MDX, I found it lacking in several areas. 1)Clunky shifting 2)Low real world highway mileage 3)Poor touchscreen response.
This was the AWD CX-9. Here in Canada, it only comes as AWD. Does your wife have the 2022 MDX? The 2022 does not have a touchscreen. It's all controlled by the touchpad.
I’ve owned multiple Mazdas and simply put, they’ve been bulletproof. I’m currently on a 2018 CX-9 Grand Touring and I love the car. Zero problems so far. However, if Mazda truly wants to compete with the likes of Acura, they MUST upgrade their safety tech. Yes, the CX-9 has features like lane keep assist but it barely works. Even the adaptive cruise fails to track the car in front if a curve is too severe. Consumers are increasingly demanding things like semi-autonomous driving tech and Mazda just isn’t there yet.
Thanks for the insight! The Mazda CX-9 (and other Mazda crossovers) actually received Top Safety Pick+ ratings from the IIHS so they are very safe vehicles. As for Mazda's driver aids, you're right. Mazda isn't quite at the same level as other brands. Even Kia/Hyundai have better systems. Hopefully this will change with their next generation of vehicles like the CX-90 and CX-70.
No disrespect but Lane keep assist should not be something that you need to drive a car it's one of the most basic skills you need to drive a car is to keep your own lane. Sorry but they should take your license away if you can't keep your own lane
@@chicoandthem4n you missed my point entirely. Should you ‘need’ lane keep assist and other advanced safety features to be a competent, skilled driver? Nope. Does all data point to the fact that these advanced safety features prevent accidents, reduce accident severity, and save lives? Absolutely. Some drivers are still divided as to whether we should rely on them; however, consumers are increasingly demanding them. Logical conclusion: if a car manufacturer wants to remain competitive, they must offer these systems. And the systems must work well.
Mazda is getting better but not quite there yet. They are little behind in terms of transmission and tech. Most shoppers that would buy the mdx would probably not look at the cx9 instead they would compare it to the Lexus RX. Me personally would rather wait for the cx50, mdx is nice but the pricing is getting up there with the Germans.
@Ruben Rodriguez I think you miss understood me when I say they are a little behind with the transmission. While a six speed transmission is good everyone has gone to 8 speed and more. Mazda could use the 8 speed from Toyota that would help with better gas mileage.
Great video. I'd love watching a video of you comparing the base MDX to the base MDX type s. I wish I could afford a type s, but it's not practical for me right now.
I'll be getting the MDX Type-S in a couple of months so stay tuned for that one. Unfortunately most manufacturers (especially premium/luxury manufacturers) usually don't put base trim models in their fleets. They like to put mid to top spec trim to show off most of a vehicle's features.
@@MGReviewsBlog Understandable. Personally, all I care about is packed into the base model(minus the type s engine). Maybe that's why it's taking extra long to get it. 😂
@@MGReviewsBlog I put my deposit down in late January I believe and was told most likely June. Lol. I'm willing to wait because I need a bigger car for my family and love how they did this new one. Hopefully it gets here sooner. No clue.
Acura went from a 5AT, 6AT, 9AT, 7DCT, and now 10AT. The multi-gear trans only really helped 0-60 times, not so much highway mpgs. Acura did a great job improving its interior compared to the previous 14-20 MDXs. The +22 Acura's extra 300lbs of weight with the same 290 hp/267tq and having to drop down up to 4 gears in the 10AT can zap the fun factor a little bit. Using the 17-20 MDX Sport Hybrid powertrain with 321hp/289tq and +26 mpgs for only $1500 more would match the extra weight and provide more performance for the current gen MDX.
Yea, what happened to the hybrid powertrain in this new generation of the MDX? I would've assumed it would be a no brainer to have it as an option for the 2022 model year.
@@MGReviewsBlog For some reason, Acura is extremely conservative and doesn't like to lead; but, mostly react in the market place. The Sport Hybrid would sell in this market with high gas prices. I get the same combined mpgs in my 4500lbs MDX hybrid as I did with my 3400lbs 06 TSX with a 2.4L I4. Acura is concentrating on pure battery electric vehicles using the same battery tech found in the new electric Hummer.
Great review ! Whoever wants to buy the Acuras , be wary of the Trackpad , it's a nightmare. Drove a RDX with it for a week , couldn't get used to it. Deal Breaker
Thanks! It took me about 2 weeks to get used to it. Tried it first in the RDX, then in this MDX. It is very hard to get the muscle memory with it especially if you use apple carplay or android auto because it reverts to a more traditional touchpad controller when using those systems.
Hi Mike, just to clarify, do you think the Mazda six-speed is the best auto in the industry, or just the best six-speed? I've heard you say it's the best six-speed previously, but to say it's the best auto overall would be enormous praise.
Sorry, I meant to say it is the best 6-speed automatic. The best automatic overall (in my opinion) is the ZF 8-speed that BMW uses in most of their vehicles.
@@MGReviewsBlog thanks! Yeah, while I agree the Mazda transmission is very smooth and quick when in auto mode, I had doubts on whether it could actually take on the ZF eight-speed, especially in manual mode. From the video, though, you seem to prefer it to the Acura ten-speed, is that correct?
I tested an older version of the MDX that also had the SH-AWD system and did not think it handled that much better than CX-9. Honestly, the CX-9 felt more car like than the MDX and was "funnier' under normal driving conditions. I would also state that both were inferior to the Audi Q7 in my mind. The CX-9 is showing its age but the base is there to make something really special. A CX-90 with a Inline 6 Sky-X engine putting out close to 300 HP and 350 LB torque but still getting 25 MPG overall would be an absolute killer vehicle. Rumors are that it will have interior sizing closer to the Telluride as well.
I agree, the CX-9 does feel better from behind the steering wheel. But the MDX is available with real torque vectoring instead if imitation by using the brakes to induce body rotation. So I meant that the MDX is better in terms of outright corner speed but the CX-9 is more fun to drive. I really hope that the CX-90 lives up to the rumors and hype!
@@MGReviewsBlog it seems to be a brake based handling system, while not as fun to drive, would actually be safer because in emergency scenarios, you are 99% more likely to be braking than accelerating.
@@MGReviewsBlog the cx90 will be introduced in the united states? ive called the head office of mazda in canada and they said cx9 will continue for now
@@mohammedjabrify For now, the Mazda CX-90 has not yet been announced for Canada or the United States. But for sure it'll be available in both countries once Mazda releases details on it.
@@MGReviewsBlog when i checked the united states website (mazda) they talked about the discontinuation of the cx9 but not on the canadian one. could it be that its only for the united states?
@@mohammedjabrify maybe but I doubt it. Usually the United States receives new models & updates before the Canadian market. For example, the US got the updated infotainment in the CX9 & CX5 half a year before we got those updates here in Canada.
To be honest, my biggest hesitation with buying the MDX is the long nose. Not only for the looks but mainly the approach angle. If youre like me and like the outdoors and like discovering new trails (not offroading) then a long nose is a problem. Honda needs to take a page from European auto makers' book.
I think you may want to look at its sister car, the Honda Pilot. It just received a new trim, TrailSport, which is a bit more off-road focused than the other trims. If you don't mind going to a different brand, there's also the Ford Explorer Timberline as another off-road ready 3-row SUV.
@@MGReviewsBlog Thank for the reply man. Yes the Timberline is definitely a good option, I might have to settle on it even though its rated lower than Honda models; Exotic Car Play Place rated it as one of the worst. I'm waiting for the release of the new CX90 due later this month. Ideally Rivian SUV would be best option.
@lev mikhaylov yes, I'm also very excited to see the new CX90 but I don't think it'll be as "off-road" focused as the CX50. It'll probably be more like the CX9 but I could be wrong. We'll see on Jan 31st.
I don't know... every time I see the Inifiniti QX60 (even the new 2022 model year), all I see is a slightly different styled Nissan Pathfinder. It's not special or different enough in my opinion.
@@MGReviewsBlog I so like the qx60 2022 with the interior color (light brown like Lexus) and the embroidery in the diamond shape. And it has a better-looking interior and comfort so that's why I think they are the same type of car. just my personal opinion though.
The base 2022 mdx comes with everything you need. The base is literally the most bang for you buck. If i need the highest trim to mazda to enjoy my Mazda then its not a luxury car 😂
I would go with the new Infiniti QX60 instead. The rear end of the Acura MDX looks very cheap and ugly. The Mazda CX-9 is nice, but still would choose the new Infiniti QX60.
Let me summarize. The four years older designed CX 9 that cost $20,000 less competes head to head with the other SUV. Let that sink in
Yes IT SURELY DOES ID EVEN SAY ITS BETTER LOOKING & BETTER IN EVERY OTHER GENERAL ASPECT
@@alexpeezy7244 hell no. Definaty not better AWD or interior or sound system
5 years older
2016 vs 2021
The CX9 is it's on little animal,sporty luxurious pulls 3500 lb trailer with ease! And still gets 26 mpg when cruising on the hwy!!
I'd buy the Mazda I've owned their cars since my 1984 Rx7, they never let me down.
Exactly
Third row seats are never meant for full grown adult I don't think that was ever the intent. Since SUVs are replacing minivans with moms, the third rows have always been intented for kids. I don't know why car reviewers always says its not for the average adult.
I personally like the Mazda CX9. For its safety and reliability.
I don't have a kid that I can put in the 3rd row to show the difference in space between these two cars and other 3-row SUVs that I've reviewed. So I try to sit back there. At least its consistent and hopefully people watching the video get a sense of how much space there actually is instead of just looking at an empty seat.
Plus, I'm not the only one with at least 6 other adults friends. If a couple of them annoyed me one night, I'd make them sit in those seats as payback haha
The Acura is more reliability and top safety smh
Good review. I test several vehicles in this class and for the price, the CX9 was the winner for me. Now owner of a '22 Carbon Edition
Thanks and congratulations on your purchase!
I tested a bunch of other SUVs and went with a 22 CX-9 Carbon. Very happy with it thus far, but not very impressed with the MPGs. Really want to the see the new CX-90 and CX-9 with the Hybrid powertrain. I think then it would be so much more competitive
MDX
Great review, happy new subscriber here! Great choice on the comparison. Both are great vehicles, and it's pretty amazing the Mazda, as old as it is, still holds its own against a redesigned MDX. Cudos to Mazda!
Thank you, glad you enjoyed the video!
I can't wait to see how far Mazda pushes their premium design over the next few years.
Mazda cx-9 hands down
I'm a little late but nice review. My wife is in the market for a compact-midsize suv after giving her '16 Accord to our daughter. The budget is $40k ($35K is ideal) and now that the CX-90 is out, I'm seeing some discounts on the CX-9 that are tempting. Previously I was looking at CRV, Kia Sportage (don't like the exterior styling), etc. The RDX is tempting but over our "desired" budget. She doesn't need the 3rd row so the size of the CX-9 isn't an issue. I know many car reviews pit vehicles in the same class when they compare... but now I find myself cross shopping a CX-9 with a CRV and it looks like the CX-9 Touring Plus is cheaper than the CRV Sport Touring Hybrid (US)! Decisions decisions... My new flaw is if the vehicle offers a better engine, it's usually the one I want and I stop considering the cheaper one. We did that with the Accord and got the Sport with the CVT... always wishing we went up to the 6 cylinder and automatic.
Glad you enjoyed my review! Funny you mention the CR-V Hybrid, it's my demo car this week. I like it but the Touring trim (which is the only trim that's available with the hybrid powertrain here in Canada) is expensive and it doesn't drive as nicely as the Mazda CX-9 does. But it is up there for comfort and fuel economy.
Acura is just badass 🤩
Mazda CX-9 for me 😍
I agree. I'd take the small sacrifice in space and so on for the better driving experience of the Mazda
Unbelievable.. MDX has way better driving experience sr
MDX is more comfortable and drives way better
The mdx’s driving dynamics is comparable to the X5, the Mazda is not even in the same stratosphere
@@drivescene6747 probably MDX is more well rev symphonic engine because it's atmospheric and it's a V6 with more hp but CX 9 is more responsive because of the torque's output with the industry's unique dynamic pressure turbo and the sensation of turbine's spooling at lower rpm are so driving enjoyable!!! I wish I would drive the next powertrain config on the CX-90!!!
Both runs in agile driveness but X5 is more sporty enthusiast and purist SUV! The Germans cars are more focused in driving Dynamics definitely.
You forgot to mention that the new MDX obviously stole many exterior design features from the CX-9. Suttle but there if you compare, and that,s a good thing IMO.
Oh? Maybe I'm blind because I don't see them haha. Which parts are you referring to?
@@MGReviewsBlog OMG how can you not see it? Front end , rear end, side profile, front wind scoops and more. Like I said, it's subtle but Acura clearly used the CX-9 design for it's influence. The former MDX was a soccer mommy van. Now it looks forward leaning and aggressive like the CX-9
ill take the Acura MDX
Yyy
Dear Sir I am yetnayet Tesfaye from Ethiopia I like very much "Mazda CX -9"2021is it available?
Love my Mazda CX-5 gtr
I like both, but prefer the Mazda. Nice review! 💯
Thanks for watching!
Why didn't you review the AWD Mazda CX-9? My wife has the MDX, I found it lacking in several areas. 1)Clunky shifting 2)Low real world highway mileage 3)Poor touchscreen response.
This was the AWD CX-9. Here in Canada, it only comes as AWD. Does your wife have the 2022 MDX? The 2022 does not have a touchscreen. It's all controlled by the touchpad.
I’ve owned multiple Mazdas and simply put, they’ve been bulletproof. I’m currently on a 2018 CX-9 Grand Touring and I love the car. Zero problems so far. However, if Mazda truly wants to compete with the likes of Acura, they MUST upgrade their safety tech. Yes, the CX-9 has features like lane keep assist but it barely works. Even the adaptive cruise fails to track the car in front if a curve is too severe. Consumers are increasingly demanding things like semi-autonomous driving tech and Mazda just isn’t there yet.
Thanks for the insight! The Mazda CX-9 (and other Mazda crossovers) actually received Top Safety Pick+ ratings from the IIHS so they are very safe vehicles. As for Mazda's driver aids, you're right. Mazda isn't quite at the same level as other brands. Even Kia/Hyundai have better systems. Hopefully this will change with their next generation of vehicles like the CX-90 and CX-70.
No disrespect but Lane keep assist should not be something that you need to drive a car it's one of the most basic skills you need to drive a car is to keep your own lane. Sorry but they should take your license away if you can't keep your own lane
Acura is more bulletproof
@@chicoandthem4n you missed my point entirely. Should you ‘need’ lane keep assist and other advanced safety features to be a competent, skilled driver? Nope. Does all data point to the fact that these advanced safety features prevent accidents, reduce accident severity, and save lives? Absolutely. Some drivers are still divided as to whether we should rely on them; however, consumers are increasingly demanding them. Logical conclusion: if a car manufacturer wants to remain competitive, they must offer these systems. And the systems must work well.
@@rahimi4762 you’re prob right. But Mazda is getting there!
Mazda is getting better but not quite there yet. They are little behind in terms of transmission and tech. Most shoppers that would buy the mdx would probably not look at the cx9 instead they would compare it to the Lexus RX. Me personally would rather wait for the cx50, mdx is nice but the pricing is getting up there with the Germans.
@Ruben Rodriguez I think you miss understood me when I say they are a little behind with the transmission. While a six speed transmission is good everyone has gone to 8 speed and more. Mazda could use the 8 speed from Toyota that would help with better gas mileage.
Great video. I'd love watching a video of you comparing the base MDX to the base MDX type s. I wish I could afford a type s, but it's not practical for me right now.
I'll be getting the MDX Type-S in a couple of months so stay tuned for that one. Unfortunately most manufacturers (especially premium/luxury manufacturers) usually don't put base trim models in their fleets. They like to put mid to top spec trim to show off most of a vehicle's features.
@@MGReviewsBlog Understandable. Personally, all I care about is packed into the base model(minus the type s engine). Maybe that's why it's taking extra long to get it. 😂
@@alucarus6 what was the wait time that you were quoted by the dealership?
@@MGReviewsBlog I put my deposit down in late January I believe and was told most likely June. Lol. I'm willing to wait because I need a bigger car for my family and love how they did this new one. Hopefully it gets here sooner. No clue.
@@MGReviewsBlog I still don't have a build date. Just talked to my salesman a week ago. Was also told he has a list of 50 people waiting for MDX.
Thanks for this comparison
Thanks for watching!
Great comparison. Now time for a ride 😊
Acura mdx hands down
Acura went from a 5AT, 6AT, 9AT, 7DCT, and now 10AT. The multi-gear trans only really helped 0-60 times, not so much highway mpgs. Acura did a great job improving its interior compared to the previous 14-20 MDXs. The +22 Acura's extra 300lbs of weight with the same 290 hp/267tq and having to drop down up to 4 gears in the 10AT can zap the fun factor a little bit. Using the 17-20 MDX Sport Hybrid powertrain with 321hp/289tq and +26 mpgs for only $1500 more would match the extra weight and provide more performance for the current gen MDX.
Yea, what happened to the hybrid powertrain in this new generation of the MDX? I would've assumed it would be a no brainer to have it as an option for the 2022 model year.
@@MGReviewsBlog For some reason, Acura is extremely conservative and doesn't like to lead; but, mostly react in the market place. The Sport Hybrid would sell in this market with high gas prices. I get the same combined mpgs in my 4500lbs MDX hybrid as I did with my 3400lbs 06 TSX with a 2.4L I4. Acura is concentrating on pure battery electric vehicles using the same battery tech found in the new electric Hummer.
GM is apparently building an SUV or two for Honda/Acura using their Ultium battery tech through the new partnership they signed.
You get for what you pay.. MDX any day !!
mazda cx-9 all day cheaper and fun to drive
Very good comparison / Review 👍
Thank you!
Great review !
Whoever wants to buy the Acuras , be wary of the Trackpad , it's a nightmare. Drove a RDX with it for a week , couldn't get used to it. Deal Breaker
Thanks! It took me about 2 weeks to get used to it. Tried it first in the RDX, then in this MDX. It is very hard to get the muscle memory with it especially if you use apple carplay or android auto because it reverts to a more traditional touchpad controller when using those systems.
That's why people test drive vehicles before owning/leasing them.
Hi Mike, just to clarify, do you think the Mazda six-speed is the best auto in the industry, or just the best six-speed? I've heard you say it's the best six-speed previously, but to say it's the best auto overall would be enormous praise.
Sorry, I meant to say it is the best 6-speed automatic. The best automatic overall (in my opinion) is the ZF 8-speed that BMW uses in most of their vehicles.
@@MGReviewsBlog thanks! Yeah, while I agree the Mazda transmission is very smooth and quick when in auto mode, I had doubts on whether it could actually take on the ZF eight-speed, especially in manual mode. From the video, though, you seem to prefer it to the Acura ten-speed, is that correct?
@@vvapredator yep, absolutely. The Mazda transmission feels a bit more responsive that the 10 speed in the MDX when taking over the controls.
The Mazda 6 speed is actually one of the worst transmission today, many reviewers and magazines have attested to this.
@@drivescene6747 kinda hard to even bother replying to your arguments
I tested an older version of the MDX that also had the SH-AWD system and did not think it handled that much better than CX-9. Honestly, the CX-9 felt more car like than the MDX and was "funnier' under normal driving conditions. I would also state that both were inferior to the Audi Q7 in my mind. The CX-9 is showing its age but the base is there to make something really special. A CX-90 with a Inline 6 Sky-X engine putting out close to 300 HP and 350 LB torque but still getting 25 MPG overall would be an absolute killer vehicle. Rumors are that it will have interior sizing closer to the Telluride as well.
I agree, the CX-9 does feel better from behind the steering wheel. But the MDX is available with real torque vectoring instead if imitation by using the brakes to induce body rotation. So I meant that the MDX is better in terms of outright corner speed but the CX-9 is more fun to drive.
I really hope that the CX-90 lives up to the rumors and hype!
What year MDX did u test? The Audi is bland
@@MGReviewsBlog it seems to be a brake based handling system, while not as fun to drive, would actually be safer because in emergency scenarios, you are 99% more likely to be braking than accelerating.
Great video. The planned CX-90 should be interesting
Thanks! Yes I'm looking forward to the next generation Mazda CX9. Hopefully the rumors are true and it'll be a RWD platform with an Inline 6 engine.
@@MGReviewsBlog the cx90 will be introduced in the united states? ive called the head office of mazda in canada and they said cx9 will continue for now
@@mohammedjabrify For now, the Mazda CX-90 has not yet been announced for Canada or the United States. But for sure it'll be available in both countries once Mazda releases details on it.
@@MGReviewsBlog when i checked the united states website (mazda) they talked about the discontinuation of the cx9 but not on the canadian one. could it be that its only for the united states?
@@mohammedjabrify maybe but I doubt it. Usually the United States receives new models & updates before the Canadian market. For example, the US got the updated infotainment in the CX9 & CX5 half a year before we got those updates here in Canada.
Nice review.
Glad you enjoyed it
To be honest, my biggest hesitation with buying the MDX is the long nose. Not only for the looks but mainly the approach angle. If youre like me and like the outdoors and like discovering new trails (not offroading) then a long nose is a problem. Honda needs to take a page from European auto makers' book.
I think you may want to look at its sister car, the Honda Pilot. It just received a new trim, TrailSport, which is a bit more off-road focused than the other trims. If you don't mind going to a different brand, there's also the Ford Explorer Timberline as another off-road ready 3-row SUV.
@@MGReviewsBlog Thank for the reply man. Yes the Timberline is definitely a good option, I might have to settle on it even though its rated lower than Honda models; Exotic Car Play Place rated it as one of the worst. I'm waiting for the release of the new CX90 due later this month. Ideally Rivian SUV would be best option.
@lev mikhaylov yes, I'm also very excited to see the new CX90 but I don't think it'll be as "off-road" focused as the CX50. It'll probably be more like the CX9 but I could be wrong. We'll see on Jan 31st.
I like both but would buy the Lexus RX, MDX is 2nd choice. Mazda may “feel” like premium but RX & MDX are “real” premium.
I'll be driving the RX450h later in the month and I'll do a comparison against the updated Infiniti QX60. Stay tuned for that one.
Right, a dressed up Pilot - and Highlander - setting the standard for premium
it's a nice video, I have a cx9, But I think if I had a budget of 6 to 70,000 cad I would definitely choose the infinite xq60 over the Acura.
I don't know... every time I see the Inifiniti QX60 (even the new 2022 model year), all I see is a slightly different styled Nissan Pathfinder. It's not special or different enough in my opinion.
@@MGReviewsBlog I so like the qx60 2022 with the interior color (light brown like Lexus) and the embroidery in the diamond shape. And it has a better-looking interior and comfort so that's why I think they are the same type of car. just my personal opinion though.
You rather get a Nissan Pathfinder and save some $
who buys infinity these days lol
@@tigersjk2558 why
Good job on the review. Keep working hard..c'mon now
Thank you!
Thanks.
These two cars are marketed to different demographics
Yea I know. But I just wanted to see how close Mazda is to becoming a premium brand.
Mazda CX-9 Signature is much more better than Acura 👉
The base 2022 mdx comes with everything you need. The base is literally the most bang for you buck. If i need the highest trim to mazda to enjoy my Mazda then its not a luxury car 😂
I am no car expert but I drove both last week cx-9 is a dumpster fire this guy has no idea what he is talking about
You're right, with driving over 300 cars in my past, I have no clue what I'm talking about 🙄
I would go with the new Infiniti QX60 instead. The rear end of the Acura MDX looks very cheap and ugly. The Mazda CX-9 is nice, but still would choose the new Infiniti QX60.
I'll have the 2022 QX60 & Lexus RX450h on demo at the end of the month. So expect to see those reviews in March!
@@MGReviewsBlog Great
Infiniti is a Pathfinder