How BAD can it be? Spitfire Mk.Vb Plastic Model Kit in 1/72 Scale from PM Model - Build & Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2023
  • The Supermarine Spitfire Mk.Vb was an upgraded variant of the Spitfire which saw service with many allied air forces during the Second World War. Join me in this video as I complete a "back to basics" build of the PM Model Supermarine Spitfire Mk.Vb/c (PM-101) plastic model kit in 1/72 scale, rounding off the completed build with a review.
    For a full & detailed unboxing, take a look at that specific video here:
    ▶️ • The WORST Spitfire Mod...
    💥 Thanks to BeIzzi for sponsoring this video & if you would like to get your hands on some of these high-quality riveting tools, take a look at their website here: www.beizzi.cz
    This "back to basics" build will feature simple techniques to complete the build, as well as using some of the Humbrol Gen 2 paints in an active build to really see how they compare to the earlier tests I gave them.
    🖌️ Take a look at the Humbrol Gen 2 paint reviews here:
    ▶️ First look: • First Look at the BRAN...
    ▶️ Paint Brush test: • NEW Humbrol Gen 2 Acry...
    ▶️ Airbrush test: • Humbrol Gen 2 Acrylic ...
    Some of the painting products used in this video were received free of charge for the purpose of review, however all opinions remain my own.
    🔥 Welcome to the Model Minutes Community! 🔥
    Are you ready to take your scale modelling skills to the next level? We're here to help you unlock your full potential, and we've got a treasure trove of exclusive content, perks, and a vibrant community waiting for you. Join us on this thrilling journey by becoming a part of our passionate modeller's club!
    🔶 Become a Patreon Supporter: Your support is crucial in helping us grow and produce more amazing content. Pledge your support and discover the fantastic perks waiting for you: / modelminutes
    🔷 Channel Membership: Dive deeper into the world of scale modelling. Join the channel to access exclusive perks: / @modelminutes
    💫 One-Time Donations: If you prefer a one-time contribution, you can show your love via PayPal: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
    ☕ Buy Us a Coffee: Like what we do? Why not treat us to a virtual coffee over at ko-fi.com/modelminutes
    💬 Live Conversations: Join our Discord community and chat with fellow modellers in real-time: / discord
    🛍️ Modelling Supplies: Need the kits we've built or recommended? You can find some of them here, and your purchase supports the channel (affiliate link): www.amazon.co.uk/shop/modelmi...
    📖 Modelling Books: If you'd like to support me whilst also getting something practical that you can actually use on the workbench, please take a look here: amzn.to/3rGFBGJ
    🚀 Stay Connected: Be sure to subscribe with notifications on to stay updated and keep supporting the channel: / modelminutes
    🌟 Explore More: Check out my second channel for even more fantastic content: / @mattssecondchannel
    Let's Connect on Social Media:
    🐦 Twitter: / modelminutes
    📘 Facebook: / modelminutes
    📸 Instagram: / modelminutes
    🚀 Disclaimer: Our videos are tailored for adult scale model enthusiasts. While we strive to provide accurate information, Model Minutes holds no responsibility for any accidents, damage, or injury resulting from replicating the steps in our videos. These videos are intended for entertainment purposes only, and all information is believed to be correct at the time of editing. Unless otherwise indicated, all products have been independently purchased.
    Thank you for being a part of our incredible modeller's community! Your support makes it all possible, and together, we'll create amazing scale modelling experiences. 🔗🛠️🚁🚢🎨🌌
    Music used from Epidemic Sound:
    Day Luxe - Molife www.epidemicsound.com/track/k...
    Powerhouse 1984 - Lupus Nocte www.epidemicsound.com/track/N...
    Mountain Brook - Dylan Sitts www.epidemicsound.com/track/h...
    Night Views - The Big Let Down www.epidemicsound.com/track/T...
    Tree Tops - Autohacker www.epidemicsound.com/track/O...
    Crossing Borders - Mindserver Unlimited www.epidemicsound.com/track/X...
    #Spitfire #Modelkit #PMmodel
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 163

  • @ShuttleFactoryScaleModels
    @ShuttleFactoryScaleModels 9 месяцев назад +11

    Love the fact you decided to brush paint this kit. As a brush painter that makes me smile. Great job on the overall result from…… well this (really) bad kit. Keep up the great work Model Minutes.

  • @Razer_-fe9mo
    @Razer_-fe9mo 9 месяцев назад +8

    "How bad can i possibly be?"
    Looks like you did a good job with it even though it wasnt a great kit.

  • @PatrickTheMoth
    @PatrickTheMoth 9 месяцев назад +5

    Watching this video just made me order this kit because i want to try hand paint a model for the first time. Thanks mate .i love your videos

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      Have fun!

    • @PatrickTheMoth
      @PatrickTheMoth 9 месяцев назад

      @@ModelMinutes I will post a video and tag you in it once I've built it although my channel I not big but you know. And could you review the pm model f5

  • @stuff31
    @stuff31 9 месяцев назад +7

    For such an utterly crap kit, you did a very good job! I'd love seeing more of these back-to-basics builds. Old, slightly crappy model kits are a joy to build! (When the parts are aligned) Looking forward to seeing more!

  • @crazylocha2515
    @crazylocha2515 9 месяцев назад +9

    Well done showing what skills can do for even this bad of a kit. Very fair evaluation and fantastic job making it look that good. 👍☕🐢

  • @ModelMinutes
    @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +2

    ✨ Thanks to BeIzzi for sponsoring this video & if you would like to get your hands on some of these high-quality riveting tools, take a look at their website here: www.beizzi.cz

  • @lizardlink5130
    @lizardlink5130 4 месяца назад

    I managed to get a slightly older version of this kit for £3 at the Bovington model show, and despite its obvious problems, I'd say any model kit you're able to get for so little money is good. Great vid as always

  • @rickyquinteros7100
    @rickyquinteros7100 22 дня назад

    I’m gonna use this video as a guide for brush painting, great build!

  • @Lambonights
    @Lambonights 2 месяца назад

    Considering what you were working with here, this was a good result in the end, well done!

  • @drkisiklar190
    @drkisiklar190 4 месяца назад

    Your videos are very entertaining and your models are very detailed.

  • @docbrownscalemodels
    @docbrownscalemodels 9 месяцев назад +7

    Well that settles it - I have one of these in my stash - This just became a kit that I slap together and give to my son to play with until it breaks. Yikes that's a rough one, but you get what you pay for I suppose.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +5

      Yeah, it's not the best kit in the world lol

    • @jaws666
      @jaws666 9 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@ModelMinuteshave the beers in for this Mat.🤣🤣🤣

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +3

      @@jaws666 😂

    • @jaws666
      @jaws666 9 месяцев назад +3

      @@ModelMinutes i figured if its really going to be that bad (the kit i mean and not the video...your videos are ALWAYS awesome) i reckon i might need a beer or two.🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +3

      lol good idea! @@jaws666

  • @toboldlygosmodelworks1973
    @toboldlygosmodelworks1973 9 месяцев назад +2

    Exorcise the Demon, Nicely done @Model Minutes

  • @ianbeale2527
    @ianbeale2527 9 месяцев назад +1

    I bought this kit way back in the early to mid 1990's. I never ended up building it as it was so bad.
    Had I built this kit in the late 70's or very early 80's, it would've 100% been set on fire and thrown as far as possible in a "battle" with my best friend who no doubt would've had a bf-109. Just as we did with our "knocked out" tanks back then.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      i can imagine this being thrown out of the window on fire lol

  • @Gremlins_Modelling_Mayhem
    @Gremlins_Modelling_Mayhem 9 месяцев назад +4

    Looks like the wings are cast out of a mirrored mould and holes added where required on the underside, but should not have the two oval shapes which should only be on the top surface, though overall, great work on this kit, Matt 👍🏻

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +2

      Yeah I initially thought that, but there are some pictures of spitfires online with blisters underneath the wings as well, so not too sure

  • @andygorman858
    @andygorman858 5 месяцев назад +1

    Just bought this kit and thought I should check to see if you did a build review…..it looks like a spitfire with tropical bits, and this will be my second spitfire I’ve ever built (first was by my dad when I was 7…I’m 52 now…), so am quite happy to build this one. Cheers for the build review and your honest opinion. Will build in flying condition as a gate guardian monument.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  5 месяцев назад +1

      Hope you enjoy it!

    • @andygorman858
      @andygorman858 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@ModelMinutes will tag you on Instagram or Facebook once it’s done :)

  • @martijn9568
    @martijn9568 9 месяцев назад +3

    That's not a bad result considering everything👍

  • @RichNotWealthy
    @RichNotWealthy 4 месяца назад

    You did a good job of it with this kit. I built that kit long ago in USAAF markings HL-AA, hand painted. The fuselage seemed too slim and the wings were like slabs. To do it with landing gear retracted I scribed in the wheel well and wheels. The wings are all I have left of the model, in my scrap bits box. I've found better Spitfire Vs in 1/72 at sales here in the US for less money than the PM kit.

  • @acfnugget7880
    @acfnugget7880 9 месяцев назад +4

    First of all, you did an excellent job considering the quality of the kit.
    For the price definitely worth purchasing for use as a skills test bed and as you mentioned for the extra decals.
    As regards to the bluey grey underside paint, I just wonder if it's a quality control issue with Humbrol? My son recently used this paint on his P40 and it gave an excellent result. Smooth with no graininess at all. It has to be said that even unthinned, it took 2/3 coats to get the full pigmentation.
    As always really enjoyed the vid.👍👍

    • @keithwasntbarrumsing483
      @keithwasntbarrumsing483 9 месяцев назад

      Humbrol sadly does not always have the best quality control, even with the newer paints.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      hmm maybe different batches have different qualities

  • @spalkin
    @spalkin 8 месяцев назад +2

    I'd use a belt sander for those joints!

  • @kevinhitchcock4903
    @kevinhitchcock4903 9 месяцев назад

    You made a better job of it than I did. Excellent work 👍🏻

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      Thank you! Cheers!

    • @c.g1375
      @c.g1375 5 месяцев назад

      @@ModelMinutes gonglkupnusgsgjlnn I’lgfnunfxgngg c of n McDonald’gngngnngjgnnnngngkfcssknngnugwknusmmnnuo gnk Nikkilgn usnamnnngnginliggngnnmatter ngnnnumnmne ncnoto ta ga no

  • @Ducknuck84
    @Ducknuck84 9 месяцев назад +1

    and I would say one of those decal options is one that I don't think is done that often, that being the Turkish Air Force, quick look through scalemate shows that last 3rd party decals for the Turkish Air force were from around 2013 so paying $5 might be the cheapest and easiest way to go.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      yeah, not a bad idea to get this for the decals

  • @yorkshiremanmodels
    @yorkshiremanmodels 9 месяцев назад +1

    glad i watched this before getting this kit
    may be only 6 quid but i think i would rather save it and add that 6 quid to buying a airfix model spitfire
    you have more patience than me pal because i would have given in after finding the wings didnt fit properly
    well done on getting it to look as good as it did

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks very much! Yes, worth saving up for a better version which will save some of the headaches I had in this one

  • @sweetcorn1968
    @sweetcorn1968 9 месяцев назад +3

    Definitely one for the Pond Squadron. Lack of detail and poor representation of the subject means that’s all I’d use it for.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      sounds like a good place to put it

  • @elennapointer701
    @elennapointer701 9 месяцев назад +1

    I haven't built any model kits since I was a kid and my memories of them are faded, but my god this kit is horrible. I would have thrown it away. Well done for persevering with this pig.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks! It took quite a bit of persistence lol

  • @ade2551
    @ade2551 9 месяцев назад +3

    Personally I would like to see you make this same kit properly using an airbrush and the rivetters you advertised for example. Let's see a comparison of how good this kit could be, admittedly with a lot more time put into it 😊

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +2

      I may do that with the spitfire floatplane version i have of this kit - not sure I really want to get the same one again lol

    • @newbymick1
      @newbymick1 9 месяцев назад

      I would to see the same. Mark is more capable that he is making out to be on this kit. Just because the kit is crappy doesn't mean that a crappy job has to be done to compliment the crappy kit.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      @@newbymick1 who’s mark? As mentioned at the beginning, this was a “back to basics” build to use simple techniques and products to help inspire those starting out in the hobby, not as an excuse to “do a bad job”.
      It also gave a chance to try out the new humbrol paints rather than just on some spare sprues

  • @sandtable8091
    @sandtable8091 8 месяцев назад +1

    Sorry about the trials and tribulations of the kit, however, in your estimation is the Humbrol clear fix worth it or are there cheaper alternatives that avoid the clouding issues?

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  8 месяцев назад

      Thanks! I feel like humbrol clearfix is the same as bostik general purpose or UHU glues. Alternatively, PVA will work just as well on clear parts but takes much longer to dry

  • @sss1111ify
    @sss1111ify 9 месяцев назад +2

    Thank you for posting and persevering through this one! I see markings for Britain and the USA, but what do the third group of decals represent?
    ****
    Nevermind, I just started watching your unboxing video and saw they are Turkish. Despite the quality, I do appreciate when kits give you the option to represent different countries, like the Swiss 109 you did some time back.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      Full info was in the unboxing video, but the 3rd decal scheme was for a Turkish aircraft

  • @jamesmorgan3623
    @jamesmorgan3623 9 месяцев назад

    More information paints would be very much appreciated. I am a new to scale models and using Tamiya acrylics and found them to have very inconsistent coverage and glossiness. But being new, I am not sure if I am doing something wrong or if it is the paints.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      sounds like you aren't either mixing them enough or using an appropriate thinner

  • @argentinianspotter
    @argentinianspotter 9 месяцев назад +1

    Even if it's cheap, I'd save a bit more and get the Airfix kit, much superior in every aspect.

  • @davidhumphreys8295
    @davidhumphreys8295 9 месяцев назад +2

    I have the box art from an earlier release above my workbench. I have no idea what happened to the kit though. 🤷🏼‍♂️

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +2

      It seems many peoples versions of this kit have gone "missing" lol

    • @davidhumphreys8295
      @davidhumphreys8295 9 месяцев назад +2

      It was the box art that persuaded me to buy it 😂

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      @@davidhumphreys8295 yeah, the box art looks good

  • @rogueplastic
    @rogueplastic 9 месяцев назад +2

    Wow! Just wow!
    That kit is not even good to be a palette cleanser.
    At least they provide you with an inflight position by not gluing in the landing gear. 🤣

  • @yasirwaqar-et2dr
    @yasirwaqar-et2dr Месяц назад

    The wings are slightly drooping

  • @sianharris9155
    @sianharris9155 9 месяцев назад

    For someone like me whos still learning, i think this model would be ideal for technique practice and "back to basics" model practice. However, for more serious and experienced builders, I can see the frustrations with the fit quality and structural inaccuracies. Good for practice, not for representation I would say!

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, definitely something to mess about with 😊

  • @barrybautista4781
    @barrybautista4781 9 месяцев назад +1

    Good for building a downed aircraft for a diorama

  • @yasirwaqar-et2dr
    @yasirwaqar-et2dr 2 месяца назад

    Overall the painting is good on this

  • @markfranks1329
    @markfranks1329 8 месяцев назад +1

    Certainly not a kit to take seriously. Ok for building for a child to play with. Nothing more.
    Airfix's 1973 release of their Vb is much better.
    Fair, honest review.

  • @Reactordrone
    @Reactordrone 9 месяцев назад

    The parts look a lot like the old Frog kit although the sprue layout is different. Maybe PM cloned the parts when making their tooling rather than starting from scratch.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      Yes it does make me think it is a modified copy

  • @RMillerism
    @RMillerism 9 месяцев назад +2

    Definitely a silk purse from a sows ear.

  • @yasirwaqar-et2dr
    @yasirwaqar-et2dr 2 месяца назад

    At 2:54 the glue is in the wrong place

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  2 месяца назад

      You're supposed the glue the "Barrel" to the inside of the nose, allowing the prop shaft to rotate freely, i probably got some glue inside this barrel which caused the problem

  • @Payne2view
    @Payne2view 9 месяцев назад +11

    No wing dihedral and the underwing canon blisters should not be there. This kit is insulting.

    • @Shipnerd194
      @Shipnerd194 9 месяцев назад +10

      As someone who's not concerned about detail AT ALL and has built this kit it's a really sweet kit. However for most people who like detail it's not a good kit. We have our own opinions as different modellers

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +5

      yeah i thought that too, but there are pictures of real spitfire Vbs with underwing blisters, not all - but some, so not really sure what that is about

    • @Jimmythefish577
      @Jimmythefish577 9 месяцев назад +2

      Insulting? 🤣🤣 maybe the dihedral was lost when the mounting tabs were removed?

    • @iangascoigne8231
      @iangascoigne8231 8 месяцев назад +1

      Rivet counter in full effect.

    • @Sea-cadet2838
      @Sea-cadet2838 Месяц назад

      Hahaha

  • @bravodelta3083
    @bravodelta3083 9 месяцев назад +1

    Terrible kit, but a decent build.
    Once again the Humbrol paints look awful, but having experience with them myself it's the paint, not you! I have no idea what you need to do to make them go on decently but I've tried brush, air-brush, thinning, and no thinning. Nothing seems to work. A shame as I always used Humbrol back in the day, although there were only enamels back then! I may try some of those next.
    Great channel content as always!

  • @jaws666
    @jaws666 9 месяцев назад +1

    As far as the undercarrage is concerned i xan see why they (the manufacturer of the original tooling) did it the way they did.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      yeah, it makes it easy lol

    • @jaws666
      @jaws666 9 месяцев назад

      @@ModelMinutes hi Mat,how is your day?...yes its crude and a product of its age but bearing in mind the tooling technology of the time its actually not that bad...when it comes to kits of this vintage modellrs need to put themselves in the mind set of the day and bear in mind even for its day it was amied at the younger /beginner modeller...if you want to do it with the gear up then its already done for you or if you want it with the gear down its a simple proccess....and while i agree its also inacurate if i was a kid back when this was released and given it a a gift (birthdat or christmas) i would not have cared as i would not have know any better...build it and put it on the shelf (or hang it from the celieng) and then decide i want to build another kit

  • @willm5032
    @willm5032 9 месяцев назад

    I'm 99% sure I've got this in my stash as part of an airfix Dogfight Doubles set. Maybe they bought it/modelled it off an ancient Airfix tool? Nice job with this kit!

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      Airfix had their own toolings, this isn't one of them and as far as I know this wasn't sold by them. Its probably the old Airfix MkIX or Vb

  • @arghons.hobby.workshop
    @arghons.hobby.workshop 5 месяцев назад

    Looks like Heller.

  • @julianmhall
    @julianmhall 6 месяцев назад +1

    The model itself may be poor (OK it /is/) but the painting is very impressive :) Proof you can put lipstick on a pig :)

  • @yasirwaqar-et2dr
    @yasirwaqar-et2dr 2 месяца назад

    This kit is very easy

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  2 месяца назад

      easy in some respects, the poor design, quality and detail can present some challenges

  • @benmanning4340
    @benmanning4340 5 месяцев назад

    Still not bad for a £5.95 kit on ebay! 👍

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  4 месяца назад

      For only a few pounds more you can get the Airfix version which is considerably more accurate and easier to build

    • @benmanning4340
      @benmanning4340 4 месяца назад

      Yes of course!

  • @MakotoAtava
    @MakotoAtava 20 дней назад

    A Spitfire Mk. Vb with c-wings?

  • @fundiebasher
    @fundiebasher 9 месяцев назад +3

    Almost as bad as the Starfix kit. Yes, I built one of those.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      I’d love to get my hands on one 😂

  • @andyrichardsvideovlogs8835
    @andyrichardsvideovlogs8835 9 месяцев назад +1

    Well you could use it for "skills" practice.. or having a nightmare

  • @f_nc
    @f_nc 9 месяцев назад

    this was my first kit when i was 4, now i am 50. so i cant call it a bad kit.

  • @daniel_lucio
    @daniel_lucio 9 месяцев назад +3

    In short, keep your wallet away from this kit, Revell's P-51 1/72 has a worthy competitor

  • @yasirwaqar-et2dr
    @yasirwaqar-et2dr Месяц назад

    But its all good

  • @yasirwaqar-et2dr
    @yasirwaqar-et2dr 2 месяца назад

    Thats whu the propeller did not spin in the 1st place

  • @burgundypoint
    @burgundypoint 5 месяцев назад

    1/72 scale is the way to go as far as convenience. Larger models require so much more resources and SPACE. Where the hell do you store all the models you finish if you start racking them up? Have to give them away to children that eliminate them in 30 seconds flat 🤣

  • @neilhaas
    @neilhaas 9 месяцев назад +2

    Besides the Luftwaffe captured Spitfire by the Germans captured their own aircraft. In Luftwaffe markings.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      yes, i think they even put one of their own engines in one

  • @motthomas4220
    @motthomas4220 9 месяцев назад

    👁👁

  • @simonbaker6962
    @simonbaker6962 9 месяцев назад +4

    Sorry but that was garbage. The only display cabinet that should go in is the round plastic one with a lid that gets picked up by the council on Thursday.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      It's certainly one of the worst models I have experienced building

    • @williamwallace9427
      @williamwallace9427 9 месяцев назад +2

      Maybe... but considering how many have watched the video.. made it worth building

  • @drkisiklar190
    @drkisiklar190 4 месяца назад

    This not very detailed but it’s a great model for starters and it’s very cheap.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  4 месяца назад

      not sure such a bad kit is good for a beginner - especially given some of the issues it has

    • @drkisiklar190
      @drkisiklar190 4 месяца назад

      @@ModelMinutes but the beginners first need to understand the basics and this kit is very basic and makes you understand the glueing and painting.

  • @davidsirett5560
    @davidsirett5560 8 месяцев назад

    so the kit is about the same quality as a Mister Craft kit who also re do old FROG kits.

  • @neilhaas
    @neilhaas 9 месяцев назад +2

    The Spitfire fought against the Luftwaffe planes. RAF vs Luftwaffe. Nice fighter plane aircraft. Besides the Belgian air force & Swedish Air Force. The Spitfire also in Swedish markings scheme. ❤❤😊🤩😍🤗⭐👍💯

  • @brianartillery
    @brianartillery 9 месяцев назад +2

    It's a horrid kit. I bought one ages ago, looked at it, saw just how basic it was - I've had better models free with breakfast cereals - and resealed it all, and put it in a box with some other kits, (doubles of good ones) to be sold in a yard sale.

  • @ednitram
    @ednitram 9 месяцев назад

    This kind of horrible kits make excellent dioramas or vignettes of shot down / crashed aircraft. Better than just binning it.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  8 месяцев назад +1

      yes, or as a test for new techniques

  • @ivansmith416
    @ivansmith416 9 месяцев назад

    Nice job, but I think you paid too much for it

  • @drkisiklar190
    @drkisiklar190 4 месяца назад

    But this is very cheap and not detailed because they are Turkish made. It’s one of turkeys only scale model companies and this company normally produces gliders and electric planes.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  4 месяца назад

      i think the main reason for the poor quality is the very old tooling

  • @dimligloing
    @dimligloing 9 месяцев назад

    This is a cheap kit, probably based on a very old tooling. At that price point the target audience must be younger modellers. A cheap kit that a parent or grandparent could amuse a child with and not have to worry about the wonky glue-slathered results.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      yeah, i talk about the tooling in the video

  • @Evaunit98
    @Evaunit98 8 месяцев назад

    Who are PM model? I see their kits occasionally in my local model shop and I have no clue who the hell they are, are there kits always this crap?

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  8 месяцев назад

      They are a Turkish company, I think that they only have a couple "recent" toolings in their range, most others are either old or from other companies which they reboxed afaik

  • @martinross5521
    @martinross5521 9 месяцев назад

    Crumbs. I made many Airfix 1/72 models over 60 years ago and they were excellent. This one is a waste of time and paint. A sorry effort by the manufacturer.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад +1

      I see it more as an attempt to gain profit as cheaply as possible really, a tooling of this vintage doesn't have much business being sold dressed up in a new box

  • @leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget
    @leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget 9 месяцев назад

    I really hate pm models they make me feel like I traveled to1950s Moscow

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  9 месяцев назад

      They are turkish as far as I know

  • @vincentfiore2228
    @vincentfiore2228 2 месяца назад

    Sir, you are one of the worst modelers that I have ever seen.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  2 месяца назад

      Oh thanks, according to other people I’m categorically the worst, so it’s nice to know I’ve improved 😂

  • @ricardoroberto7054
    @ricardoroberto7054 9 месяцев назад

    Horror show. Not your fault. Just a terrible kit.