Do Indian Atheists have a soft corner for Buddhism?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 июн 2023
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @vimohlive
Support the show at / vimoh
Make a one-time donation at vimoh.stck.me/profile
Please read these rules before commenting. Follow them to the best of your ability. The rules are meant to keep the comment space clean and a safe space for anyone who wishes to participate in good faith.
1. No advocating violence of any kind against anyone for any reason. People doing so will get banned from the channel.
2. No praising or abusing any religion for any reason. Proselytising is not appreciated, nor is making generalised statements about the followers of any religion. People doing so will get banned.
3. No casteism, racism, or sexism. Discriminatory language will get you banned too.
4. Trolling, spamming, use of fake accounts to deceive people about your identity, will also get you banned.
it is not just about numbers
In india Buddhism is also seen as alternative by
many ambedkarites to uplift Dalits and give them a new identity and a community where they are not considered inferior .
So in India by default Buddhism looks much more progressive socially.
Why not just be atheist , all religions are stupid including that buddhism thing
Ambedkar has reformed a new branch of Buddhism called Navayana, which has not many dogmas as it is reformed by an intellect. Your point is also right but not having a god as center of religion and encouraging questions is also why it actually is way better than other major religions out there.
@@NTIS-DHARMIK apply more thinking
I asked gpt which is the best religion she said Buddhism and Sikhism.
@@AobixWTh I asked the same and she replied Hinduism and Jainism🙄
A proper atheist criticize each and every wrong things regarding religion caste inhumanity etc etc equally . Real athiests are not biased.
I do that. I just do it more for powerful religions in the Indian context. Just as pakistani atheists do it for Islam and American atheists do it for Christianty.
@@adityasingh-ih9pnnope you need to provide evidence on the few or your just picking straws
@@vimohliveis Buddhism a religion
@@Chhhottaaadonn yes
And what type of question is this
I think this is a positive strawman. Atheism is lack of belief in God and it's existence. There's nothing more or less to it. May be you're talking about a person who values rationality, which necessarily doesn't need to be atheist.
At last, found some one thinking rationally.
Not really. Vimoh's argument only works under the assumption that all religions are the same. It's a poor argument.
@@sabhishek9289 ultimately, itz actually the same.
@@sabhishek9289when they take their extreme forms... Much of them seems quite similar to me 😂, n being in india hindusm and islam gotta be the most similar religion in their extreme play outs... glad they ain't working together 😂
Yes he is very good, now a days you can find many channels about Rationality
@@sabhishek9289 Exactly
Buddhism itself works on the principle of atheism..There is no place for any god in the buddhism..Gautam buddha told I am not a god, I will only show you the right path to lead in your life..He never considered himself as god….
Stupid arguments like This come when u have 0 Knowledge of that Religion and haven't ever read a single book of that Religion.
First read Tripitaka properly it is ful of God, dogmas, magic , Superstitious stuffs.
😂😂😂
Neutral Answer...Vimoh Sir🤓👍
Not really. Vimoh's argument only works under the assumption that all religions are the same which isn't true. Notice how he dodges the actual question of the video by saying that "I don't think it has anything to do with Buddhism or India" and then he goes on to make a strawman fallacy of all religions.
Agree with u abhishek.
Very useful, thanks.
As an indian agnostic I don't remember putting that much thought into Buddhism beyond the situation of the Dalai Lama. We talk more about Hinduism, Islam, Christianity and sometimes Jainism. Buddhism is there in india but it has zero political influence or strength of numbers so it remains out of our cognizance for the most part.
Buddhism is actually an atheistic religion. Buddhists don't believe in any god.
LAMA ISM totally different from Buddishm
@@THEKRRAHUL Means ?
I don't think that Jainism has any political influence on India as they are a minority religion like Zorostherarians. About political influence, Navanaya Buddhism has considerable amount of them since there are some political parties like Bahujan Samajwadi Party etc.
@@arjyachatterjee6874 All the big buisnessmen are Jain like Ambani , Adani and are highly influencing politics
Because Buddhas philoshophy was greatly scientific, realistic and based on equality and not dividing human from human. buddha is more relevant today will be choise of futurastic scientific community when religion totally fails.
So rebirth is scientific, ne quit you idiot ,, don't call urself atheist if u justify any religion
Gaanta so many stupid superstitions and illogical things
@@Ttb103 what superstition?
@@SerineAshok In Buddhist jatak kathas it is written that a man peed in grass some deer eat that and the deer became pregnant.
In tripitak it is also written that if a snake bite you should eat human poop to be cured.
In tripitak it is also written that buddha walked 7 steps when he just born.
In tripitak it is also written that the day buddha got enlightenment he through a pot in a river and the pot started flow against the water flow.
If you want to know more please reply.
@@KumarHarshRaj can you mention the sources in the first two,
It is true that the buddha walked 7 steps as he was a Bodhisattva who had perfected the 10 perfections. The pot had started to flow against the river because he had tested himself that if he'll attain the enlightenment the pot will flow against the flow of river.
Well said ❤
I previously heard everything of Human with Science but Vimoh is far different from them. He is totally logical
Hws and Vimoh both are great
Geographically it makes sense to criticise the majority religion, and from a content creator's point of view it makes sense, but as an atheist, you should remain critical and sceptical of all religions and cults.
Otherwise, you are just a *insert religion* phobic.
well said, sir. well said.
Agreed, majority religion is hinduism, so it will be main reference religion for atheists in india. I feel like people who ask this question are mostly brahmanvadi who are jealous of oppressed caste people converting to Buddhism.
They aren't becoming Buddhists but they r becoming toxic bhimte .
@@certifiedsanatani becoming bhimte is far better than becoming raamte. Atleast they are free from the so called thekedars of sanatan dharma and can literally fight back for their rights. Actually it is the manuvadi raamtas who fear and have jealousy as they are losing their power and status slowly as many dalits in huge numbers are leaving sanatan dharma.
@@manaspratimdas707 who said? 😂😂 bhimte r more busy in finding 100 ways of abusing sanatan.
@@manaspratimdas707 bhai bhimto ko dalito se mat jod . bhimte r just triggered stupids on internet who have 0 knowledge of anything.
@@manaspratimdas707 who is saying that hindus are losing their power ? u may live on mar 😂😂
I have a question sir
Isn't just Hinduism a dominant religion in india but it isn't a hindu country like pakistan is islamic
And india is secular here the riots occur from both sides ??
My question is the example you gave a toxic ice cream is polluting the mall what if you cure this thing by giving them some drinks and the drinks were too polluted
Isn't here critisism of both valid ?? Equally for health of people ??
The reason for critisism of Christianity in america is that there is no such big opposing religion that would cause violence among them
There is one sided toxicity
But in india this 2 groups are righting for centuries here the toxicity is from both sides
I don't agree with this logic because if we live rationally we have to question each and every dogma if we want to create a rational society.
U can disregard dogma in Buddhism as Buddha himself said use ur mind not just believe even if Buddha himself said so , or tradition said so.
Really you are real atheist 💯💯💯💯💯💯🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰.
Interesting, Vimoh. But for India, I have surprisingly seen only hindus ( whether they have become athiest from Hindusim or religious)watching both like your channel, Pravanv's Channel & Harris Sultan's channel ( he is amazing too like you). All of your 3 youtube channels and more such an athiest channels from Indian subcontinent, regardless of whether it is exhindu, exmuslim, etc , maximum viewers are hindus or exhindu ( or whatever you would like to call anyone who left Hindusim and become Athiest). I don't see much athiest who left other faiths apart from Hindusim. I was surprised by Harris Sultan's channel, too. There also most people who watch and comment on his videos are people like Exhindus or Hindus , very few other ex. So that's something strange I have found.
Vimoh's argument only works under the assumption that all religions are the same. It's a poor argument.
@@sabhishek9289wrong he just explained about power structures
@@ashwinvk4124 Assuming that he is talking about religious power structures, he is still wrong even if he explained about power structures. Not all power structures are the same. It's poor reasoning on his part.
@@sabhishek9289 okay which religion has the biggest hand in politics in India ?
@@ashwinvk4124 My first thought would tell me to say Hinduism but Hinduism isn't really a religion rather it's a nationalistic political group that consists of countless religions and philosophies of which some maybe atheistic in nature. The official religion that has the biggest hands in politics is Islam and second place would be Communism/Marxism which is an atheistic religion. (yes, Marxism is a religion as Karl Marx originated drafted his book "the communist confession of faith" which was later renamed "the communist manifesto".)
❤❤❤❤
Buddha's Teaching Definitely Work Because Of Very Simple Reason. He is not a god , He is just a philosopher who goes so much deep In His Unconscious Mind Through Meditation. That's why his philosophy is so deep and relevant today because we humans didn't change so much. And One More Thing because of going Deep Inside the Mind , He have deep knowledge about human Psychology . Anyone can do it. Anyone can be buddha. But It's ask for too much sacrifice. It Gives You Unbearable Pain. Because At the end that pain is what make you wiser. That's is the reason why we found great teachers from buddhism even except buddha who have deep knowledge about mind. Ex-Milarepa , Boddhidarma , Nagarjuna , Chandrakirti etc. They all are genius in human psychology because of it. And We found also some same connection in hinduism. But Not Deep as Buddhism. If You find my comment helpful Please Give me a reply??
Make a video on Sikhism too. I mean just your opinion or feelings on it.
Yeah Sikhism needs calling out, they think they're immune to criticism... Bhindranwale and babbar khalsa didn't come out of nothing.
@@spuriusscapula4829 it comes out of frustration when you think your community hasn't got equal rights + militaristic nature of Sikhism + all those are separatist groups not linked with religion or theology. Sikhism doesn't say do x,y,z like what they are saying. Sikhism doesn't has expansionist nature neither does it claim any lands as theirs.
It's more like we Sikhs deserve a homeland if our own homeland discriminates against us we need a separate homeland ( as moronic as it sounds this is their justification) ( regardless of the fact homeland discriminates or not )
Akin to Russia vs Ukraine both are orthodox Christian countries fighting for land claims
Similarly it's the fight of Sikhs.
Combine it with Sikhs consider themselves a separate political entity or not.
As for bhindrawaale the matter is more convoluted, he was a violent and charismatic man thinking he is fighting for the rights of Sikhs.
His rise is contemporarinous with Sikhs being lynched while peacefully protesting ( like Punjabi sooba movement)
His answer to this was keep weapons and defend yourself because "anti-sikh " government this along with the militaristic nature of Sikhism gave him moral justification to weaponise.
Note: he himself did't take any responsibility for assassinations but said that since government isn't doing anything this is how justice will work ( since he had no respect for constitution which he deems anti Sikh and antithetical to sikh concious since it classifies Sikhs as Hindus )
Now obviously you won't have heard about sikh perspective on blue star
The planning of attack preceded 3 years, if attack was just to take out bhindrawaale he was in Delhi 3 months before the operation)
The attack was an open attack on sikh concious and their anti congress views. ( Because Indira was opposed vehemently in Punjab ) and 40 other gurudwaras in Punjab region were attacked and burned ( this is all searchable what would their justification be?)
After the attack, the youth greatly agonised took up weapons and formed an ill trained militias
They did everything killed innocent people including sikh leaders whom they thought were liberals. They even killed who was supporter of bhindrawaale . As any private militia would do. ( You can read about military history when civilians take weapons for example 1st crusade they ransacked their own allied kingdom Byzantium )
Now you can criticise the militaristic aspect of Khalsa ( Khalsa is subsect of Sikhi)
They killed longowal*
@@bbhhgghhh9337 boht vadiya "Jatta"
@@abineshkumar3021 i am not a jatt
There is more to it though. Many people in US too has this glamorized idea of Buddhism that Buddhism is atheism or humanism.
Zuckerberg used to call himself atheist once ,then said he finds Buddhism interesting and has now turned Buddhist per internet.
Buddhism has many of the same beliefs as Hinduism and needs to be called out.
Fact is Buddhism is an atheistic/humanistic religion. It's not a glamorized version of Buddhism. One can be an atheist and religious at the same time.
Also Hinduism is not a religion on its own. It consists of so many religions and philosophies of which some of the religions and philosophies in it are atheistic in nature.
I am an atheist but and i don't want to ever be a Budhist but i understand why Budhism attract Many atheist because there is a version of Budhism which is Totally Atheist and deprived of any Supernatural beleive. And there are brances of Budhism which is Dogmatic like other religion but that atheist version is popular among some atheist.
Many Americans find Hinduism progressive and many Indians find Christianity progressive. However it doesn't make sense for say an American atheist to criticise Hinduism as much or vice versa. That's because the politics, culture, dogma of these places are shaped by the majority religions. These atheists more often than not come from these majority religions, so they also have more understanding of it. A Sri Lankan or a Burmese Buddhist will have a better understanding of both the religion and it's impact on their country's society and politics. So they will be in a better position to criticise Buddhism compared to Vimoh.
What does buddhism has similar to Hinduism? And why does it need to be called out
@@EduHub-gn9oz
Abortion
Sir ak channel hindi ka bhi ham log ka English itna thik nhi hai to aap ki bate samjhne mai bhut dikkat hota 😢 piliz hindi mai bhi dale
They aren't atheist
they are mostly neo buddhist ambedkarites and some hindus with caste guilt
U r ✔️
Vimoh's argument only works under the assumption that all religions or religious power structures are the same. It's a poor argument.
Big chunk will be Brahmanvadi pretending to be atheist
Absolutely right
They are Atheist if they're Ambedkarites.
And Buddha himself was an atheist, if you read his teachings and not the multiple branches or even the "religion" of Buddhism.
Read Kalama Sutta.
I am not a true atheist but I think the answer would be
Buddhism never support the idea for divine god that I Siddharth Gautam the Gautam Buddha made this and that I am creator I am destroyer
He never says I will came in help just think of me when you are in trouble he says be a light to yourself no one’s gonna help you I am just a human you yourself can help yourself I am not any avatar of any of gods or something like that which people talk about he was a prince and wanted to know about what pain and suffering is and why it exists and what’s the solution…later the things some people added were all fake that he is reincarnation of Vishnu and other superstitions
@@user-hl9jq8iz4i right 👍
I agree
Vimoh's argument only works under the assumption that all religions or religious power structures are the same. It's a poor argument.
@@sabhishek9289 ur argument works only against every other religions except ur own religion / dharma!!
@@sangramjit2966 I'm not a Hindu. You are just spamming this everywhere it seems.
@@sabhishek9289I'm not a hindu as well and seems like you're spamming this same comment as well 😂
@@NeKo19113 Except my argument is sound. So it makes sense to spam it unlike his argument.
Buddhism is atheisttic dharma not religion, as there's no relevance of a creator god or other gods of importance in Buddhism. Buddhism is an individual science of mind and innate study rather than banging and relying on external supernatural or divine power of any kind.
It is a brilliant module to explore human potential from the within with skilful and optimum use of the most precious attribute of intelligence. It is also an natural science, as its fundamental principles are in accordance with the law of nature like interdependent origination and the law of cause and effect.
Buddhism emphasizes truth rather than God. Meditation rather than prayer.
Logic and common sense rather than faith and belief. A universal life rather than individual life.
Buddha said, " you as an individual human is very powerful. Appu depo bhahva. Be your own light".
What's the difference between truth and god?
@@mr.gamerkabir8142
Truth is verifiable with logic, reasoning, investigation, analysis, contemplation, common sense and experience. If not found acceptable, can be rejected.
God has to be believed out of faith and all god centric religions are to place faith or belief before anything.
That's the difference.
@@theflowoflife4252 oh c'mon
Then you don't know about Hindu school of thoughts of yoga nyaya mimansa sankhya and vedanta
God alone is truth
@@mr.gamerkabir8142 Mr. Sankhya and mimansa school of philosophies are atheist in nature. Be enlightened be before writing any random option
Well
GOD IS CREATION OF HUMAN NOT VICE VERSA!
@@scienceyug6798 sankhya philosophers have accepted god in their philosophy and laid the foundation of god's nature in the vedanta and other school of thoughts
Many mimansa scholars have been defeated by vedanta scholars in hinduism throughout history?
So?
Ok as an atheist when its comes on topic of Buddhism i always shut my mouth! I don't know why but its different from other religions.
Lol mahar zadu mar be 😇
@@KingKing-ky5tt ooo shivaji wala ahe ka tu 😂, Afzal Khan ni gand maarli hoti tumcha raja chi.
@@KingKing-ky5ttmahar🤔 ... Dude fir toh tujhe jhadu marna padega, cuz tumhari job toh usko mil jaegi on account of the thousand yr old inhumane treatment to his people.
So i guess this jhadu 🧹 is yours ?
Tell me you are a neo Buddhist without telling me you are a neo Buddhist.
@@KingKing-ky5tt Mahar is a one of the Brave caste who are Non hindu in maharashtra they just slaughter 28000 maratha soldiers! Battle of Bhima koregaon.
real
No its because of Dr ambedkar
No, it has nothing to do with Dr. Ambedkar! We respect him, he is even my idol but it doesn't mean I will not criticize Buddhism just because he accepted it. Looks we are here for rationality and scepticism not for being a blind follower of anyone else. And the second reason Vimoh has explained in the video.
@@LoveYourself-my9nz I was talking in general . I know many marxist who are atheist but have converted in buddhism in legal papers because of reading ambedkar’s work.I am personally atheist only and not buddhist
Brahmavadi jealousy from buddhism
@@LoveYourself-my9nz Ambedkar was against Indian freedom struggle movement.
@@Chaddest_Maximusare you high or what? 😂😂😂
There is no live today..
I got trolled by people at Facebook group, when I criticize Bhuddhism, even though they knew I am atheist. One said atheists should not criticize Bhuddhism
What did you say?
@@Pantheist2602 it was image post.
Father- you are failed in exams. You have wasted money, respect in society, etc.
Son - papa. I am leaving home and going to Bhuddha. Buddham Saranam Gacchami . Passing/ failing in exams, Money, respect in society, etc ego and moh-maya (materialism). I am leaving all 🤣
@@Someone-ee1lr bro i think you lost you should accept islam🙄
@@infinity0695 no way. I am materialistic, atheist. I Iike worldly life. I don't even understand spirituality word properly.
@@Someone-ee1lr lol even I chuckled and I am a buddhist. Prolly they don't know how to take a joke.😂
The fun starts at 2:20. 😁😁
🎯
I am Buddhist and can I also called myself an atheist because Buddhism is based on atheist philosophy except the cycle of rebirth
There is no rebirth concept in buddhism
If there is no self what even is rebirth.
@@mayur00nbb666 yes there is , and also there are gods like vajrapani is another sect of Buddhism, in Tibet they believe in divine god , There are also different sect of Buddhism
@@pifi12 yes u r right but these gods are not materialistic gods ,they represent ego, love and other emotions. Please take therovada in consideration ,tibeatian buddhism is highly influenced by hinduism.
@@mayur00nbb666But Mahayana also believes that kind of stufs.
Because Buddhist philosophy does not believe in god.
Read buddhist scriptures.
@@KingKing-ky5ttfocus on mohini avatar and flying Hanuman
@@Ulpzexkgwjjzx8655 why should I would focus on flying buddha and those rice which grow reproductive organ in human according to buddhism.
@@KingKing-ky5ttBuddhism didn't exist because of Scriptures.....
Scriptures of Buddhism self denies that they are totally correct 💯
In Kalam Sutta its clearly said that don't believe in any scriptures or anything which is illogical, factless, even though those things are spread in the name of Budha,
And Even don't believe in anything which is illogical factless even if it was said by Budha....
So if Budha himself and Scriptures are saying such things ....
Then in which basis are you criticizing Budha???
😂😂
@@KingKing-ky5tt Please, can you name those scriptures which mentioned about God, I wanna read.
ohk power structure is understandable :~
then if world is more better without religion do ambedkarite agree as buddhism also should be get away as world be better place without religion and buddhism is also a religion
specifically ambedkarites....
Why are you asking this Question to an Atheist, ask that to an Ambedkarite.
@@basantprasadsgarden8365 😂😂exactly
Vimoh's argument only works under the assumption that all religions or religious power structures are the same. It's a poor argument.
@@sabhishek9289 correct as amnedkarites claim themselves atheist though in simple words anti caste so Vimoh is against caste based discrimination so he should answer that
@@yashi276_am any sensible human being will be against Caste Discrimination.
Aren't you a Sensible Human being?
Or you support the Caste Discrimination or Honour killings in the Name of Caste (which is more common than one can think)
Like myanmar
Buddhist extremist persecuted rohingya
It's more about politics. U can never find any text on Buddhas teaching About hate or killing. Instead it's forbidden even.
@@dufus360 because islam is a evil religion the Rohingyas wanted to make Myanmar a islamic country
To save their culture they persecuted muslims
Self defence is not wrong
Answer of all atheist ⚛
Lie In history of budhisum
And history of hindu in Mahayan budhisum
Tibetan book Goldensukta
Completely agree with you but I do agree that some neo atheists have soft corner not for buddhism but buddha bcz now when we read history and than understand how ancient india was much more rational and democratic than today and also equality was there. Buddha's own philosophy doesn't go against rationality so it's a win win for us.
Who said buddha philosophy is rational. There are tons of things on buddhism which are not rational.
Btw where did you seen democracy in ancient India?
Atheism and Buddhism are not necessarily incompatible. I think that this is one reason why many atheists have a 'soft spot' for Buddhism. There are some branches or strands of Buddhism that are atheistic. Atheism in general is not necessarily incompatible with religion per se.
Then why not neo atheists prefer Jainism?why they always choose Buddhism instead of Jainism. There are not many differences in Buddhism and Jainism.
区别很大 天上和地下
Buddhism says that there is no god and your life is totaly dependent on you
Budhhist....nah
Disciple of Budh ✔️
I hav the problem with soo called baba, aur jo gyaan dete hai aisa tha aisa huya tha etc etc.....
I belive god thts enough i dont go into story this tht
Buddhism = Atheism
Shakya Muni Budh can be called first atheist
Hell no.
@@KumarHarshRajWhy Not???
@@KumarHarshRaj hell yes buddha clearly rejected god
@@dexterboro1836 because atheism also doesn't believe in any Transcendental world or any divine things. On the other hand Buddhism talks about rebirth, soul, weird ways how the world emerged and many more.
@@unknown_atheist because atheism also doesn't believe in any Transcendental world or any divine things. On the other hand Buddhism talks about rebirth, soul, weird ways how the world emerged.
Mostly Ek Party K Supporter He Bo Ex-Muslim Channels Ko Bahat Promote Karte He. Isi Liye Nahin Ki Atheist He. इसी लिए करते है के बह Muslim से नफरत करते है
कल्प वीगर्ह नाम से एक मूर्ति है जिस पर दावा किया जाता की ये 30000 साल पूरानी और यह विष्णु की हैं । कृप्या इस पर बताइये।🇮🇳 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙🙏🇮🇳
Dude atleast give some truthful news, these fake statues from WhatsApp RUclips Facebook... While no single evidence found of that idol, not even news channels talked about it. It's a reel statue not real statue 😂 ... And this racket was propagated by a fake ID of k k mohomed on twitter and mahakal atma on wikipedia.... K k doesn't even use Twitter 😂 ... And already made public that these fake news is being spread by a fake account by his name
Dhatu vigyan itna purana nhi ho sakta ! Murty kala bhi itni purani nhi jb ki bharat me murty kala 1st ace ke baad bani
@@Ulpzexkgwjjzx8655 dude no such statue exists... It's fake news propagated by a fake id ok K k Mohammad which actually is just RSS page....
He was an ASI officer... someone made a fake id of him to share this story on his website.... But dr k k has already made public that his fake id is spreading false news.
Bro religion is not problem superstition and culture is problem
most religon supports superstition
Buddhism koi dhrm ni h dhamm h dono opposite h dhamma is way of lifs
dharma, way of life keh keh kae bhagwaan ko pujna, creator hai isko maan lena, pseudoscience jod dena, yehi to krte aaye ho, to religions or dharma m koi farak ni reh gya, agar tum way of life v lead krre ho, fir v as a human being part of sanatana dharma tum andhviswas krre ho, or kuch v puja paath krre ho, shubh ashubh maan re ho, to u r not exceptional , my friend💀💀💀💀, dumba** !!
aise way of life way of way of life kehke kitna din chalaoge ? aakhir mein religion ,dharam,dhamma sab ek hi meaning mein simat k reh gya hai !!! wo sbhi superstition ko hi back krta h, worshipping a creator/multiple creators , ultimately💀💀💀💀.. got it ?
@@sangramjit2966buddhism doesn't believe in creator god
Enough of your bullshit
You buddhsits have now started to copy this from Hindus
Bas Dharm ko dhammm bana diya
@@sangramjit2966nope Buddhism doesn't promote the idea of God. That's why it's the way of life. Unlike hinduism where they call it a way if life but indulge themselves in rigorous religious practices.
Hey Vimoh, the stereotype fallacy is fallacious. Not all religions are the same. And not all religions involve belief in God or gods. So your entire video is just wrong.
True
what ur argument would b then ? accept hinduism !!?? 😂😂 real moksh prapti ?😂😂 at the end of the day u will still b found worshipping any sort of god/idol, and still here u came whining and crying over vimoh's statement !! so, don't think ur hinduism is superior, coz it also opposes the core idea of atheism, practically. And, itz very astounding that guys like u always target bigger to smaller atheist utubers , but don't sort out urs own time for throwing arguments on illogical religious idiots , specially from ur hinduism !💀💀💀💀 ??lol
@@sangramjit2966 crypto.
The Only unbaised Atheist and Rationalist Channel i found in India❤
Where were u brother for years😭
Hinduism is hard to believe there is lots of mythology 😪 😪
You never studied Hinduism.
@@KumarHarshRajI think you never studied Hinduism....
Tell me what are the Religious books of Hinduism?? 🥱
@@unknown_atheist Vedas
@@KumarHarshRaj In which Vedas it is written that your religion name is Hinduism???
In which Vedas even a Hindu name is written??
😂😂
Tell me bro tell me!!
@@unknown_atheist Hindu is a geographical identity not religious Vedic is actually name.
What is Buddhism?
Who are Buddhist?
The Philosophy of Budha is Buddhism‽
Peoples who agree with philosophy of Budha, are Buddhist‽
Guys without knowing any history of Buddhism and Budha you are saying why you don't criticize Buddhism and Budha!!!
First thing is why should we criticize Budha???
Did Budha told to beleive in God?
Did Budha told us that he is God either he is a massenger of God??
No.....
Budha was an Great Atheist, a great Philosopher....
You guys didn't even know the philosophy of Budha and want us to criticize Budha??
And don't talk about branches of Buddhism like Mahayana, Vajrayana, Tantrayana, they were came so later after the death of Budha....
Why don't you talk about the core philosophy of Budha???
Give me a single reason to criticize Budha??
Ok so we can criticize, Mahayana , teravada and other branches of Buddhism.
@@jawabesikhwa4830 If their is something you can, But
What will you criticize?
Their is clearly written in their Scriptures that you don't need to follow anything blindy,
If anything is factual, logical then you should have to follow...
But anything which is illogical, factless, Unscientific you don't have to follow it, their is no need to follow those things even if those things were tought by Budha himself....
So if you see any things which is illogical, factless, Unscientific rather than criticize those things you have to correct those things.....
That's the beauty of Buddhism and why Atheist don't criticize Buddhism....
But in other Religions their religious texts says that all the stuff in their Scriptures are truth and all the things mentioned their should have to practice without questioning.....
Whereas in Buddhism there is no such thing....
You have to use your own brain....
You don't need follow anything blindy...
So why would you criticize and what will you criticize??
@@unknown_atheist When did I say that I will criticize buddha, but there are lot of people's in teravada, Mahayana, and other sects of Buddhist who believes in many different things such sprituallity, rebirth. Most of them believe that there is something happens to soul after death.
@@jawabesikhwa4830 Ohk, So you can criticize people....
But by doing such thing and believing in those things, they are totally doing opposite of what Budha tought,
And that's why Even in Scriptures itself it is written that to follow only things which are logical, factual, scientific, etc.
So, technically there is nothing to criticize Buddhism but yeah you can criticize even Budha if their is such thing which is told by Budha is logicless, Unscientific, Factless,
Then you can,
And one more thing you should also have to look about History and culture of all Buddhist countries....
Cause Buddhism is originally Originated from India,
But all the texts of Buddhism got destroyed....
And other countries where Buddhism is adopted they mould the Buddhism according to their culture,
Like Mahayanis, before adopting Buddhism they likes elephant and also worshipped Elephant, So when they adopted Buddhism you will see the changes...
Like Elephant Headed Budha,
So it happens,
But what should we have to follow is just Philosophy of Budha what makes you Buddhist..
You have to follow the things tought by Budha,
And then criticize Budha if you see anything wrong....
@@unknown_atheist U said that Buddhist scriptures got distroyed and some get corrupted, then how can someone learn about Buddha, how can someone says that this was taught by buddha if the scriptures got Corrupted. One more thing if I Call Mahayana , teravada , Tibetian Buddhist that what u are following is not teaching of buddha they will start mocking me.
Hey there, french atheist, here. I can confirm (from a western perspective) that I have a soft spot for buddhism.
That's because buddhist's metaphysics is very close to western traditional "proto-atheism", like democritus, heraclitus and parmenides' thought. Of course, buddhism still conveys tons of superstitions, but at least it offers a different perspective on the "accumulated" and temporal nature of the mind, as opposed to the concept of eternal soul.
I always have wondered, by the way, how can buddhists reconcile reincarnation with the anatman. That sounds rather contradictory to a non buddhist mind.
May I know what superstitions does Buddhism have?
@@EduHub-gn9oz read tantrika aspects of Buddhism
Hindi bolo yr 😢
Upper Caste वाला Atheist है ये 😂😂😂
Aur aap neo buddhist 😂
@@Drken712 matlb main bola woh thik bola...