Gravitational acceleration

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
  • Answer to a question by a student on independence of gravitational acceleration from mass

Комментарии • 397

  • @priyabratadash381
    @priyabratadash381 Год назад +25

    There is a concept called Active Gravitational force and passive gravitational force. Active gravitational force accounts for the gravitational field strength of a massive object, whereas passive gravitational force accounts for how other objects gravitate in the gravitational field of the former one. The concept of acceleration due to gravity comes in the category of passive gravitational force. F= Ma or a= F/M . An interesting thing here is that in an active gravitational field the force acting on any mass is proportional to its mass and every time the ratio between force to mass taken, the result arrives is a constant, which is the acceleration due to gravity. Another important thing is that, when two bodies are gravitationally interacting, one with extreme larger mass (M) like earth and other with smaller mass(m) stone , the force between them is equal and opposite but due mass difference the stone will accelerate towards earth with constant acceleration of appreciable magnitude(roughly 9.8 ms^-2) whereas the acceleration of earth although constant towards the stone is so negligence to be detected. But between the sun (with extremely larger mass compared to earth) and earth the centripetal acceleration of earth towards the sun is of great magnitude. Simple formula: F= M A =ma, if F is constant then for M>>m, A

  • @bhavishyagupta8032
    @bhavishyagupta8032 Год назад +312

    Sir I request you to take physics classes for classes 11-12 regularly . 😃
    We would love that .😀🙏.
    Huge Respect Sir🙏

    • @AdarshSingh-ls6ll
      @AdarshSingh-ls6ll Год назад +47

      bro he is a great physicist and a scientist not your teacher who would take classes for jee/neet grow up lil bro

    • @bhavishyagupta8032
      @bhavishyagupta8032 Год назад +19

      @@AdarshSingh-ls6ll bro i agree to you i only made a request and i have met sir in kanpur university previous season so i know his grandeur as im from kanpur only i request him to explain topics of his book concepts of physics written by him😀

    • @AdarshSingh-ls6ll
      @AdarshSingh-ls6ll Год назад +6

      @@bhavishyagupta8032 as a student doing his physics major I would like him to make lectures on higher physics that so that I can share it to my foreign friends also haha

    • @isohel9889
      @isohel9889 Год назад +3

      @@AdarshSingh-ls6ll But he's so humble unlike many people

    • @bhavishyagupta8032
      @bhavishyagupta8032 Год назад +3

      ​@@AdarshSingh-ls6ll yupp you can ❤ i am no one to interrupt😊

  • @_navamusic3054
    @_navamusic3054 Год назад +126

    Pure Gold Teacher of Physics ❤️❤️ and not a Bussiness Minded teachers like nowadays (like physics wala, unacademy etc)

    • @ROHU-uq2rg
      @ROHU-uq2rg Год назад +16

      ​​@@sandeepchawla-of4si agr spelling check krne ki jagah pdhlo to bohot kuch mil jaega bss har jagah PW krne se kaam nhi chalta

    • @indian-jc5bo
      @indian-jc5bo Год назад +3

      ​@@ROHU-uq2rg correct 💯

    • @Rudrature
      @Rudrature Год назад +3

      ​@@sandeepchawla-of4si fir to HC verma diamond hai bro...tum nhi samjhoge....

    • @Rudrature
      @Rudrature Год назад +2

      ​@@sandeepchawla-of4si jinke pass paise nhi unke liye kya krenge pw etc

    • @deadrage2703
      @deadrage2703 Год назад +3

      Bhai unko sarkar itna Paisa deti hai ki unko jarurat bhi nhi.....unko pasand hai padhana isiliye wo padha dete hai

  • @shivanidixit8932
    @shivanidixit8932 Год назад +42

    Your way of explaining is so awesome sir!! Thankyou for this informative video 😊

  • @_punjabi_singh
    @_punjabi_singh Год назад +38

    Legend who will remain alive for centuries through his videos

  • @MTmultipletechnology
    @MTmultipletechnology Год назад +6

    BEST Physics TEACHER IN WORLD ( THAKUWA ) KE LIYE PADHAI KI SIR NE 😊 KON KON SIR SE INSPIRE HAI LIKE Karo sir ke struggle ke liye

  • @al-rahman26
    @al-rahman26 Год назад +27

    sir please upload videos on tough topics of physics for the student who wants to crack IIT JEE. Please Sir, the way you are explaining is best LOVE YOU SIR

  • @Maskedhelm1
    @Maskedhelm1 7 месяцев назад +1

    Love u sir ji ur the one of the best Indian educators of all time but I didn't read ur book because it's too complex for my simple mind to understand हमारे लिए RUclips पर हर समय उपलब्ध रहने और सभी भारतीय प्रतिभाशाली दिमागों के लिए आपकी जिज्ञासा उत्पन्न करने के लिए धन्यवाद सर

  • @AnshPathak2005
    @AnshPathak2005 Год назад +1

    2 most beloved teachers jinki voice ekdam calm h aur pure din sunne ka man krta h:
    Vikas divyakirti sir & hcv sir

  • @arnavspecial
    @arnavspecial Год назад +4

    It's basically acceleration due to gravity (denoted by g) acting irrespective of object's mass

  • @iqbn1275
    @iqbn1275 Год назад +2

    My name is jatin Kumar from faridabad haryana . I am preparing for neet 2025.
    Wave theory says that When a black body is heated then the intensity of flame increase not the color change.
    Particle theory says that intensity has no impact of temperature, it says that the freq increases and leads to the change in color.
    And in the ncert of class 11 chem .
    It is written - when an iron rod is heated in furnace it is initially dull red but as temp inc. it becomes bright or dark red . ( Wave theory)
    But in the next line it is written that the color change from red to blue.
    So my doubt is that here both theory are used and could not justify that intensity inc. or color change

  • @Ignitit
    @Ignitit 2 месяца назад +1

    This man is legendary.

  • @adityasinha5853
    @adityasinha5853 Год назад +1

    Means for a freely falling body we are taking g as it's relative 'acceleration'

  • @satyendraprajapati8886
    @satyendraprajapati8886 Год назад +3

    Aap jaisa physicist India ko kabhi nahi milega

  • @muhammadislam5138
    @muhammadislam5138 Год назад +1

    Apple Force ( formerly known gravitational force ) draws any object to its center ( and here, the surface of the earth is not center but the resting place with specific Apple Force power consumption ) at the same acceleration rate of 9.8 meter per second but gets squired when a falling mass holds up the Apple Force motion incrementally in same manner, reaching towards the distance to its center until gets obstructed or being at rest, to which the earth planet is being compacted. Either the earth or any object falling towards it doesn't attract each other rather they are compacted with specific Apple Force power.

  • @aayush554
    @aayush554 Год назад +15

    sir you taught my teacher and your teachings are reflected back in very beautiful way.

  • @Shubham_Mishra166
    @Shubham_Mishra166 Год назад +11

    Sir you r always evergreen 🙏

  • @kunalsharma-pb3qd
    @kunalsharma-pb3qd Год назад +2

    He really makes videos in Hindi🔥🔥🔥....so much respect

  • @ambergupta5531
    @ambergupta5531 Год назад +11

    Superb Sir... Huge respect 🙏

  • @skylar5674
    @skylar5674 Год назад +1

    Yes concept with the situation mentioned is very important at what condition mentioned is upmost important in derived expression ❤️

  • @Neeraj-mo4vf
    @Neeraj-mo4vf Год назад +1

    I also have a que . light is electromagnetic waves it doesn't have colours in it .. then is light a mixture of waves whose wavelength are 380-450 nm ,,, 450-495 nm ,,,495-570 nm ,,,570-590 nm ,,,590-620 nm,,,620-750 nm .. as many teachers say apple appears red because it absorb all colours except red . but light do not have colours in it .. then it should absorb different waves that are in light ..but light is wave itself then how light has different waves in it

  • @aayush780
    @aayush780 Год назад +4

    I was studying about metals and conductors right now. Thanks for the information 4:16.

  • @mathsfoundation3500
    @mathsfoundation3500 Год назад +4

    Sir u are a great teacher..please write a book on maths also....like concept of physics...🙏🙏

  • @karanveersingh2864
    @karanveersingh2864 Год назад +3

    We can also understand this by examining the equation of gravitational field strength i.e. acceleration due to gravity...

  • @infinityeducation4all
    @infinityeducation4all Год назад +2

    Such a humble person❤😍

  • @RohitKumar-qi5od
    @RohitKumar-qi5od Год назад +7

    When I listen to you sir my mind becomes so calm. thank you so much sir .

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  Год назад +12

      So nice. Understanding science is a divine feeling.

    • @AvaneeshSaurabb578
      @AvaneeshSaurabb578 Год назад +1

      ​@@hcverma2928 Sir channel is really your's

  • @priyanshupal3629
    @priyanshupal3629 Год назад +6

    You are my inspiration sir ❤

  • @satyamverma8932
    @satyamverma8932 Год назад +2

    Respected sir,
    Could you please explain the below confusion: 👇
    What is the actual linear magnification produce by a biconvex lens of sun which is at infinity? In this question we got two answers by using
    formula 1 :- magnification = v/u
    formula 2:- magnification = Hi/Ho

  • @kumarvivekranjan8663
    @kumarvivekranjan8663 Год назад +5

    Then Earth creates a kind of force like electrostatic force which attracts the objects towards its. And it is responsible for gravitational acceleration for that particular object only. But one question I have, is it same acceleration for every objects due to gravity. Please explain...🙏🏻

    • @AnmolAgarwalCreates
      @AnmolAgarwalCreates Год назад +1

      I kinda don’t understand what you are trying to ask
      I guess you want to ask if the acceleration due to gravity and acceleration of a object due to earth’s gravitational field are the same thing
      Answer- Yes they both are the same!

  • @SwayamEinsteinEdits
    @SwayamEinsteinEdits Год назад +4

    SIR ,
    This Concept is also in class 10th book Sci 1 of Maharastra state Board pg no.10🎉😊

  • @navneetyadav0024
    @navneetyadav0024 Год назад +1

    Sir I am 'bsc' student my question from Relativistic mechanics is that
    " If a body is moving with the comparable nearly equal to the velocity of light then body atten infinite mass"
    "I thik let us take a pen moving with velocity is equal to velocity of light then it destroy the Earth if it collide "?
    Please solve my doubt sir..

  • @rabindramishra5209
    @rabindramishra5209 Год назад +9

    Sir please explain "potential difference between the two points" and "electric potential of a point" and necessity of these

    • @msumankumar951
      @msumankumar951 Год назад +3

      See potential means degree of unstability means if I have a spring which is fixed at one end and I have not done anything to that spring then it is in its normal or stable state or 0 potential but when I stretch it I disturbed from its normal state , at that point it has some degree of unstability and that is called as potential.

  • @user-iv2nx3ps1t
    @user-iv2nx3ps1t Год назад +1

    Apke darshan pakar dhanya ho gya sir 🙏🙏🙏

  • @jaiho-pankajkumar
    @jaiho-pankajkumar Год назад +2

    I always learn something from your videos sir😊😊😊😊

  • @RajpalSingh-nh6zs
    @RajpalSingh-nh6zs Год назад

    Great sir we have read from your book 15 year ago... it is great to see u in person

  • @viral_memes4u
    @viral_memes4u Год назад +1

    ALAKH PANDEY. STUDENT ✋
    I can feel it

  • @Neeraj-mo4vf
    @Neeraj-mo4vf Год назад +1

    why gravitational constant has dimension. It just a number…
    force has dimensional formula as MLT-2 which mean it depends on mass length time .. but gravitational constant is just constant it does not depend on any .. Then how G has dimension

  • @mehasrivastava5644
    @mehasrivastava5644 Год назад +1

    Sir , I am your great follower. Here's a question -
    If only colour sensitive cells inside the human eyes are able to see the colours so , what is the actual colour of the world / universe or everything is colour less ???
    Sir , please answer this 👆👆👆

    • @Noeticnomad0
      @Noeticnomad0 10 месяцев назад

      It's a question of understanding of basics.
      What is colour?
      It's just due to light means em wave of a range of particular frequencies. Actual colour of world is what that we are able to see. Because colour is nothing that really exist it is because humans can sense it does not mean that it exists. There is no actual colour of world because it is refrence based.

  • @nidhishrivastava2352
    @nidhishrivastava2352 Год назад

    stone ke do sides , space ka contraction ya kahen density , alag alag
    jabki Earth ke dono side ek barabar , kyonki earth ne hi to space time ko contract kiya hai

  • @Arghya_deep
    @Arghya_deep Год назад +1

    Sir -ve × -ve = +ve why , I am Arghya from West Bengal, Kolkata, aslo sir your book concept of physics is awesome, there is no book in theory that can beat this (now) ❤❤❤

    • @xyz7_12
      @xyz7_12 Год назад +1

      It can be explained by number line..(.class 6 UP board) Change ur board.

    • @Arghya_deep
      @Arghya_deep Год назад +1

      @@xyz7_12 Hello don't criticize a board. Every board is good. Some board is few better but other board not to be criticized.
      Keep it in your mind 😉

  • @manthankobra
    @manthankobra Год назад +1

    Sir please ya batao 10/2 which is not coprime and √2 which we prove coprime in ist case we say its rational in second case we say it is irrational how ?????
    Please tell me if any one know

  • @meharpreetsingh4115
    @meharpreetsingh4115 Год назад +3

    "Suppose we have 2 celestial bodies of equal mass and dimensions . If the are apart by some distance which is as good as for them to collide. This is a case for a line .
    But if there are 3 , 4 , 5 , n ... celestial bodies of same mass and dimensions , and are arranged in a regular polygon , like equilateral triangle , square , etc . Then will they collide or not as each of them is holding the other with same force ? Do the system stood stil or revolve in a circular manner and how and why?
    This is a case of 2D , we can also think for 3D like cube with each body at each of its corners.
    This also means that this system could survive in also dimensions, except 1D . Is it true or not ? Please solve my doubt sir .

    • @vivekbhawsar77882
      @vivekbhawsar77882 Год назад +1

      As per My Knowledge they all planets in described cases will collide at same time

  • @Knowledgepolyhedron
    @Knowledgepolyhedron Год назад +1

    Sir your explanation is better than your book 😅
    Love you Sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  Год назад +1

      This is direct answer to a question by a student. Natural.

  • @AideNew
    @AideNew Год назад +1

    Sir matalab hum object ke relative motion ko study karte hai, I might terribly be wrong, plz correct me if so.

  • @devendravishwakarma9491
    @devendravishwakarma9491 Год назад

    The lord of physics God sir kya aapki book concept of physics thodi jaldi nahi aa sakte hain hindi version vol 2 please sir 🙏 Kyoki mujhe tyari aap ki book se karna hain mujhe sir department of basic science main jana hain please sir 🙏 🙏

  • @CIM245
    @CIM245 Год назад +1

    Thanks sir

  • @oyeemahendra
    @oyeemahendra Год назад +2

    Sir this is my QUESTION:-
    " AS WE know earth is moving round
    So if we flied helicupter above the earth surface at any certain height in India and fixed its positioning(like it's not moving it's just at a place above " ) then if continued this process amd kept our helicopter stationary (*like sometime birds are a same place neither they are moving upward,downward,back nor forth*)
    Will after 24 hours(* one complete rotation of earth) that same helicopter flewed in India be in America (* or any other places or countries)
    **ASSUMPTIONS IS** A earth is moving but helicopter isn't so it has to be sky but the ground level has to be changed *)
    Please reply sir..
    Or any of you who understood my question and has answers
    Baaki sir ki smile achi lagtibhai 😊❤❤❤❤

    • @locagamer5966
      @locagamer5966 Год назад

      Bhai wo india ke usse fix part pe hi rhega 24h ke baad bhi

    • @hazardspelgaming5110
      @hazardspelgaming5110 Год назад +1

      Helicopter Location on Earth.
      User
      If a helicopter is flew for 20 hours on stationery location at a fixed place in India, after 20 hours will it change the place as Earth rotates ?
      ChatGPT
      Yes, if a helicopter remains stationary at a fixed location on the surface of the Earth for 20 hours, it will change its location due to the rotation of the Earth.
      The Earth completes one rotation on its axis in approximately 24 hours. Therefore, during the 20 hours the helicopter remains stationary, the Earth rotates by approximately 20/24 or 0.833 degrees. This means that the location of the helicopter on the Earth's surface will have changed by 0.833 degrees due to the Earth's rotation.
      The exact distance the helicopter has moved depends on its location and the distance from the equator. The distance covered by the helicopter can be calculated using the formula:
      distance = (angle in degrees) x (pi/180) x (radius of the Earth)
      Assuming the helicopter is at the equator, which has a radius of approximately 6,371 kilometers, and the change in position due to the Earth's rotation is 0.833 degrees, the distance covered by the helicopter in 20 hours would be approximately:
      distance = (0.833) x (pi/180) x (6,371) = 147.8 kilometers
      Therefore, after 20 hours, the helicopter would have moved approximately 147.8 kilometers due to the Earth's rotation.
      User
      If a helicopter is flew for 20 hours on stationery location at a fixed place in India, after 20 hours will it change the place as Earth rotates? Which country will it be ?
      ChatGPT
      If a helicopter remains stationary at a fixed location in India for 20 hours, it will change its location due to the rotation of the Earth, as explained in my previous answer. However, the helicopter will still be in India after 20 hours, just in a slightly different location.
      The change in the helicopter's position due to the Earth's rotation is determined by the latitude and longitude of its initial position. Assuming the helicopter is initially located at a fixed point on the ground in India, its new position after 20 hours will still be in India, just shifted slightly due to the Earth's rotation.
      The exact location within India where the helicopter will end up after 20 hours depends on its initial position, as well as the latitude and longitude of that position. The change in position due to the Earth's rotation will be different for different locations within India. However, it is safe to say that the helicopter will still be within the borders of India after 20 hours, just in a slightly different location

    • @oyeemahendra
      @oyeemahendra Год назад

      @@hazardspelgaming5110 Thank you brother!!!

  • @ak2526
    @ak2526 Год назад +1

  • @BTSArmy-gh8wx
    @BTSArmy-gh8wx Год назад +1

    Sir different objects ka different weight Hota he means earth unhe Alag Alag Force Se khichta he to acceleration to force people depend karta he to phir acceleration due to gravity Sab objects pe constant kyu rahata he jab Unke weight different he

  • @akhandbharat3537
    @akhandbharat3537 Год назад +1

    Einstein of 21st century ❤

  • @krantikumarlilhare1608
    @krantikumarlilhare1608 Год назад

    Sir apki smile bahut acchi h
    New member in your RUclips family

  • @alinjacob5517
    @alinjacob5517 Год назад +2

    Sir I don't know whether my doubt is Dumb or not but I am asking still. Sir, work done in moving a charge from centre of a spherical shell is 0. Since V=W/q --> V=0 at centre according to formula but charge's potential at centre is same as that of its surface. V---> Potential 'just for info'

    • @tarunsuman1676
      @tarunsuman1676 Год назад

      V is not W/q , its Energy/q and W= change in Energy so if W=0 means change in energy is 0 means energy and potential is constant.

    • @alinjacob5517
      @alinjacob5517 Год назад

      @@tarunsuman1676 sorry did'nt get your point

  • @sushmameharia8387
    @sushmameharia8387 Год назад +1

    Sir was you a teacher of paradise coaching classes in 1992?

  • @AJAYKUMAR-oi9ft
    @AJAYKUMAR-oi9ft Год назад +6

    Sir how does light reflect from a solid opaque surface ? Kindly describe it on sub-atomic level.

  • @srikantabairago7622
    @srikantabairago7622 Год назад +2

    Sir...I am Pratyusha Bhattacharyya and I am form West Bengal, Santiniketan...I am in class 9...actually sir I have a question....Why like charge repel each other and positive charge attract each other ?....sir please answer me...I really want to know the reason behind it...sir I asked my school and tuition teachers but no one answered me rather they said not to ask stupid question....

    • @Swaroop704
      @Swaroop704 Год назад

      You have asked really a complicated question, this statement can be proved if you know concepts of quantum mechanics you know. I have also tried to find this question everywhere but could not

    • @Swaroop704
      @Swaroop704 Год назад +1

      If you have studied hcv sir's book part 2, there is this explanation by hcv sir himself
      If two objects have masses, they experience gravitation force however when electron, proton were discovered, it was found that electron repealed each other with a force strong than gravtiy ( this force is electrostatic). And electron proton attract each other. So they were given a new property. Known as charge
      Just like mass creates gravitation so this charge creates electrostatic. So the scientists gave electron and proton charges and to differentiate them they gave them positive and negative charge.
      These are just arbitrary, it doesn't not mean that electron have neg. Charge so they have less charge.
      It is just for distinguishing between them.

  • @spacetospace100
    @spacetospace100 Год назад +1

    Great 💐💐🔭🔭📡📡

  • @Neeraj-mo4vf
    @Neeraj-mo4vf Год назад

    light is electromagnetic waves it doesn't have colours in it .. then is light a mixture of waves whose wavelength are 380-450 nm ,,, 450-495 nm ,,,495-570 nm ,,,570-590 nm ,,,590-620 nm,,,620-750 nm .. as many teachers say apple appears red because it absorb all colours except red . but light do not have colours in it .. then it should absorb different waves that are in light ..but light is wave itself then how light has different waves in it

    • @TRAYANSHU
      @TRAYANSHU Год назад

      Bro apple have red pigments which make it appear red that would the reason i think!

  • @basujain8928
    @basujain8928 10 месяцев назад

    Luv you sir from heart❤❤❤❤❤❤you are god of physics

  • @mitrayusinha9810
    @mitrayusinha9810 Год назад +4

    N.B. - Does energy flow through wire ? If I have a wire 12 lakh km long (6 km +ve , 6 km -ve ) , then will it take 4 sec to light a bulb or just instantly?

    • @aman_sp03
      @aman_sp03 Год назад

      This question was actually answered by veritasium in a series of two videos. You will get the best conceptual understanding there.
      m.ruclips.net/video/oI_X2cMHNe0/видео.html

    • @donno9984
      @donno9984 Год назад +2

      Instantly drift speed

    • @mitrayusinha9810
      @mitrayusinha9810 Год назад +1

      @@donno9984 can you explain

    • @AnmolAgarwalCreates
      @AnmolAgarwalCreates Год назад +1

      @@mitrayusinha9810 There are free electrons in the whole wire [ assuming the wire to be a good conductor] and since as you said it’s positively charged in one half and negatively charged in second half then there would be an electric field in the whole wire from positive part to negative part and electrons all over the wire will start experiencing the electric field as soon as electric field is established [ Here As soon as you get your wire positively and negatively charged , at that instant only electric field is established and electrons all over the wire start experiencing the force]. So yes you can say it’s takes negligible time to light up the bulb

  • @Abhinavdixit12345
    @Abhinavdixit12345 Год назад +1

    Sir i m a regular viewer of your video's.. The filament of a lamp is 80 cm from a screen and a converging lens forms an image of it on a
    screen, magnified three times. Find the distance of the lens from the filament and the focal
    length of the lens.pls give me solution for this question..

  • @Makstory150
    @Makstory150 Год назад +1

    Sir I have a question that in the areas where temperature is in (-ve) the lake freezes upto some extent why it is not frozen completely we can easily find water if we dig there ??

    • @xyz7_12
      @xyz7_12 Год назад

      Class 10 icse

  • @_MADARA_FF_OFFICIAL_
    @_MADARA_FF_OFFICIAL_ 11 месяцев назад

    Sir I am in class 9th and because of you I am interested in physics ❤️

  • @user-xr1hk4gy4k
    @user-xr1hk4gy4k Год назад +1

    Sir I have a doubt. if we say a relation is a function by vertical line method in a graph. in sin and cos graph if we increase the range means multiply with a number then graph.hight increases then we use vertical line method to define function infinite points are touching it is still a function...

  • @thecivilmantcm6518
    @thecivilmantcm6518 Год назад

    F=mg=GmM/R2, g=GM/R2= Constant valid for near to the earth surface

  • @Lokeshdevi207
    @Lokeshdevi207 Год назад +1

    Sir bhotki ka jagat part 2 kab aayega 🎉

  • @rajeshparab1968
    @rajeshparab1968 Год назад

    I have question "If order of magnitude of any physical quantity can be expressed as A × 10n where 'A' is a number such that 0.5 ≤ A < 5 then how gravitational constant is 6.667 x 10 ^ -11 ?"
    I heard 2 answers 1 ) this rule is only applied to exponent between -1 and 4
    2). The order of magnitude rule is a rough estimation technique, and it is not used to determine the exact values of fundamental constants like the gravitational constant.
    Which is correct answer.
    AI tools are confused on this.

  • @integration8274
    @integration8274 Год назад

    Gravitational acceleration mass pe dependent krta hai agr mass bahot jyada ho to, like agr earth pe earth ke mass ke half maas ka object gir rha ho

  • @Kiddycafe
    @Kiddycafe Год назад +1

    The question is really😃😄😆🖒🖒

  • @shreyanshtiwari8670
    @shreyanshtiwari8670 Год назад +3

    Thankyou sir!😀

  • @vivekbhawsar77882
    @vivekbhawsar77882 Год назад +1

    Sir my name is anshu Bhawsar, I am from mandsaur Madhyapradesh,
    My Question is that as we know that there are infinite number of possible orbits (assuming circular orbits) Of a fixed radii is possible around a heavier objects in space but that shows means there are infinite number of possibilities to create whole in space time fabric but black whole creates only One agretion disk how it is possible

  • @satyendraprajapati8886
    @satyendraprajapati8886 Год назад +2

    Sir am your big fan ❤❤

  • @AdarshYadav-k09
    @AdarshYadav-k09 Год назад +2

    Excellent Sir ❤❤

  • @kristena343walls
    @kristena343walls Год назад

    An informative video thank you sir.

  • @meharpreetsingh4115
    @meharpreetsingh4115 Год назад +1

    If somehow the acceleration of both object and earth are the same . We know the force acting on both is also the same (Newton's 3rd Law ) . Therefore the mass of both the objects must have to be same to satisfy F=ma (Newton's 2nd Law ) which is not never never possible. Hence , this can be proved by contradiction method

  • @PAR_DADI_347
    @PAR_DADI_347 Год назад +1

    Sir I have a doubt I am a student of class 11th and for 2 years this question is revolving in my mind
    The question is according to the Law of conservation of mass (Antoine Lavoisier) a mass neither be created nor be destroyed: then how is the universe expanding if we can't form a mass ??

    • @PAR_DADI_347
      @PAR_DADI_347 Год назад

      I am Sachin Mishra of class 11 in Gaziabad

    • @mysticdragonex815
      @mysticdragonex815 Год назад

      Mass can be created with energy and vice versa.

    • @laks._.
      @laks._. Год назад

      search about dark energy

  • @Soltris_yt
    @Soltris_yt Год назад

    Sir, but there is some acceleration of earth towards the stone which is highly negligible....
    Acceleration of the Earth towards the Stone is much much much smaller than the acceleration of the stone towards the Earth because Mass of the Earth is much larger than the mass of the stone.
    am I right sir ??? hope you will correct me if I'm wrong.

  • @Saifulsk834
    @Saifulsk834 Год назад

    Agar,Mass pe dependent vi ho,tab vi earth and a small ball (Let-1Kg)per same force act hoga.because of very huge mass of earth 🌎 its acceleration is a=F/M=1.640939086×10^-24 m/s2 which tence to Zero.but for a ball 🏀 acceleration is a=F(same)/m(small)=9.8 m/s2 .this acceleration is very very high respect to earth.

  • @dhoomdhamaka7138
    @dhoomdhamaka7138 Год назад +1

    Why we can identify that light is switched off or onn with our closed eyes ?........................................please tell us about that. Sir

  • @sanidhyakumarghosal1005
    @sanidhyakumarghosal1005 Год назад

    Sir aapko koti koti naman. Hare krishna 🙏

  • @raghavmishra7240
    @raghavmishra7240 Год назад +1

    Sir aapse KV IIT me mil ke accha lga 🔥

  • @JayaJayaShreeRama
    @JayaJayaShreeRama Год назад

    ।।दण्डवत प्रणाम ऋषिवर।।
    ।।हर हर महादेव।।

  • @SahilsinghNag20
    @SahilsinghNag20 Год назад

    In short acceleration due to gravity "g" is taken always with respect to Our mother earth which is independent of mass .......
    Main Focus should be on with respect to earth 🌎

  • @heardchal9781
    @heardchal9781 Год назад

    Thank u sir ji

  • @Vivek-ko7xm
    @Vivek-ko7xm Год назад +1

    GMm/R2 hota hai to simple hai a is Gm/R2 ab since m is small acceleration is small still wo Earth ka mass pe depend nahi kar rha Sahi hai!

  • @djgoswami360
    @djgoswami360 Год назад

    आध्यात्मिक की दृष्टि से उत्तर दिया गया गुरुजी ने। 🙏

  • @AnubhabLaha-oy2ch
    @AnubhabLaha-oy2ch Год назад

    Great teacher of physics. 🎉🎉🎉

  • @bipinkumar-zt4mz
    @bipinkumar-zt4mz Год назад

    🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @HHP93
    @HHP93 Год назад +1

    Mere sir bhi kaha karte hai ki kisi formula ko yaad rakhne se jyada jaruri uski conditions ko yaad rakhna hota hai

  • @dipankarrao1085
    @dipankarrao1085 Год назад +2

    Savage 🔥🔥🔥

  • @Hey_Ananyasingh
    @Hey_Ananyasingh Год назад

    He'll proffesor hc varma ,
    I am ananya Kumari I read in class 10 those who try never give up,
    It is gravity and g= gm and do the quality and depend of gravity and law of motion and they the look here and gravity and gravitational system
    To took here and they depend mass it constant value 0:29
    🙏🙏

  • @Vaigyanikjeev
    @Vaigyanikjeev Год назад +1

    Sir i have a doubt, what is the value of acceleration due to gravity in the centre of earth and why it is infinite? Plz sir tell about this

    • @AnmolAgarwalCreates
      @AnmolAgarwalCreates Год назад +2

      Acceleration due to Gravity is GM/R^2 and at the centre if we want to calculate the acceleration of any object due to earth’s gravitational field then it’s distance from the centre of the earth becomes zero since it’s already at the centre of the earth and something divided by 0 is infinity so from here you can get the basic idea / solution to your question!

  • @Prade81970
    @Prade81970 Год назад

    Stone par khade ho kar dekho dharti bhi accelerate hoti dikhegi acceleration frame of reference par depend karta hai ki aap Kahan khade hokar observe kar rahe ho

  • @lostnfound1634
    @lostnfound1634 Год назад +3

    Sir can you please tell the difference between Angular Acceleration and Centripetal Acceleration? Please sir its a kind request.

    • @jayjeet2006_2
      @jayjeet2006_2 10 месяцев назад +1

      Centripetal acceleration acts due to centripetal force.

  • @Alpha-ej7ro
    @Alpha-ej7ro Год назад

    Sir I'm confused with a question please help me
    Blue planet is known as:
    A) Earth
    B)Neptune
    C)Venous
    D)Saturn

  • @GoluC-rz8ud
    @GoluC-rz8ud Год назад

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @LKGuptarmp
    @LKGuptarmp Год назад

    Sir the are bubbles formed in bottle in landscape view(not in portrait view) if they are formed in air they should be formed in both the cases

  • @mithileshprasadsingh7304
    @mithileshprasadsingh7304 Год назад

    🙏

  • @bioledgeofficials_prabhakar
    @bioledgeofficials_prabhakar Год назад +6

    Hello sir , I have a question , how fair is to consider mass is variant by relativity concept. Can we also say mass is dependent on frame of reference.. sir i will be highly obliged if you will guide me for this..

    • @resonancegaming7404
      @resonancegaming7404 Год назад

      Bro mass is fame dependent if u go speed of light then mass changed

    • @aman_sp03
      @aman_sp03 Год назад +1

      @@resonancegaming7404 not necessarily speed of light

    • @mitrayusinha9810
      @mitrayusinha9810 Год назад +1

      Mass is the measure of inertia. It should not change while changing frame of reference.

    • @aman_sp03
      @aman_sp03 Год назад

      @@mitrayusinha9810 that’s rest mass, not relativistic mass

    • @mitrayusinha9810
      @mitrayusinha9810 Год назад +1

      @@aman_sp03 You are right. Thanks there .

  • @Nigga_H
    @Nigga_H 11 месяцев назад

    paaji sirra

  • @mrsbnionpiano9392
    @mrsbnionpiano9392 5 месяцев назад

    Sir is that mean the earth is M1 and the rock is M2 in newton's formula of gravitation?