I was lucky to see The Stones in December of 1965 Sacramento, California....I was 10....my mom loved rocknroll..so she took me.....I was one lucky kid.....remember it well.....
@@joedebaun4547 My mom was a newly divorced single parent at age 33 my dad lived 3 hours away and I’m sure he wouldn’t have approved ....but mom ruled.....mom took me to see 11 rock concerts between 1965-67 I saw all the main groups of the time except for the Beatles & few others like The Kinks, Paul Revere & the Raiders & Beach Boys......I absolutely am so happy I was able to see these groups at a young age.....
One of their great early hits! And I love that Teardrop guitar that Brian Jones is playing the main riff on. I heard it’s worth over 200k now. Incredible!
It's called "bloom" and it was always a bit of a problem with early video tape. It's also why reflections nearly wash out the whole screen. Since video tape has an infinite frame-rate, it amplifies bright signals like that to infinty. Later Quadruplex systems found a way around this with signal limiters and filters. Remember, video tape was still a fairly new technology in 1965.
Listen to the Staple singers ‘this could be the last time ‘I’ve known the Stones one since I was 6 (1967) but I just discovered the Stapes one a year ago. It’s okay Robert Johnson took Sweet Home Chicago from Kokomo Arnold’s Kokomo Blues. Ain’t nothing new under the sun. It’s all great music. 😎
Brian Jones guitar should have mixed louder. The Stones were the best when He was in the band. Keith Richards broke a string at the end of his solo. That's why his rhythm guitar dropped out. He then wisely turned down the volume of his guitar so it would not be out of tune.
Ed had one of those rare shows where the bands actually played live: no lip synch. Took techs some years to get sound mix and all right. I agree would have been nice, but we were happy getting about anything live back then
The camera barely showed Brian and Bill. I've noticed that before in these clips of the early Stones. Brian and Bill basically just stood there, so the cameramen focused Mick and Keith, because they were more interesting visually.
@@Methilde Yes, absolutely. But there are also more shots of Charlie and Keith. They were doing more than just standing there like Brian. Brian always looks uncomfortable on camera to me.
"In the fall of 1969, Ed Sullivan flew to Hollywood where the touring Rolling Stones were to tape three performances at CBS Television City. With their new guitarist onboard they performed “Gimme Shelter” and “Love in Vain” from their latest album, Let It Bleed, along with their new hit single “Honky Tonk Women.” The performance aired on November 23, 1969 and also featured jazz legend Ella Fitzgerald on The Ed Sullivan Show. That would mark the last time The Rolling Stones appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show."
A little syncing issue. The drum snare goes down before you hear it. When you look at the singing the lips look okay except in a couple spots. It's just a little off, no big deal.
I wonder why that thin sound on live performances was so typical then. Maybe the producers refused to allow much volume from the amps. I also suspect they lacked the knowledge of proper amp miking techniques then too.
See, this is the sort of upscaled video that really does not look good. Everyone looks like a weird hybrid between cartoon and real-life, I'm not sure how to describe it. Good effort though
@@luiz7993 Bom dia Luis,ocorre que os Stones, contava com Lewis Brian Hopkins Jones,que na realidade tocava , mais de 30 instrumentos, evidentemente, torna-se de extrema relevante,contar com um músico com este calibre
Aftermath e Banquete dos Mendigos (Beggars Banguet), são os melhores álbuns,apesar de ter comprado primeiramente,em 1966,o LP A Tears Go By (december's Children ),Na decada de 60, para, conseguir o disco dos Stones, tomava um suador, até porque,os representantes
ou melhor,os executivos de algumas empresas (gravadoras), exemplicando, especificamente a London no Brasil, consideravam muito arriscado,investirem, em conjuntos, que ainda estavam despontando no cenário musical,em especial,o Ie, Ie, Ie. Conquanto,fui obrigado a deslocar-me até a cidade de São Paulo,para poder comprar o disco
Em suma,neste ano de 1966, Luís Paulo Bagé, (influência dele),havia dito que procurar discos dos Stones, somente em São Paulo. A melhor loja de discos da capital do Rio de Janeiro, sempre destacava-se a Moto Disco s,com várias filiais, espalhadas no Rio de Janeiro.
Charlie Watts has always been an oldman. Brian was THE ROLLING STONE Bill's way to play the bass is so weird. The other two dudes are the clean version of Mick and Keith
12.21.20. I remember my older sister, liking Mick Jagger & the Rolling Stones better than the Beatles, I was a little kid about seven years old when she graduated from high school June 1965. We watched the Ed Sullivan show every weekend but my dad never cared for the newer groups or younger people and their style of music, he was stuck in his 1940s big band era, it’s not that it’s bad music, but it wasn’t my sisters and my era’s. music.
Hahah! You go back to 1965 and do better with what they had. TV studios, even big ones like CBS in New York were not set up to record a live band. It took them YEARS to catch up. Keep in mind too that TV was MONO back then and 99% of acts were not musical groups. I'd love to see you mix three guitars, three vocal mikes and a drum kit to mono, without overdriving the signal with NO compression and at best; using a three-input board. Good luck, Expert.
The Stones were great live early on and then they got lazy from the 70s on. They sucked live after about 74! Also the Beatles could barely hear themselves play because of all the idiots screaming and crying, which is one of the reasons they stopped touring according to McCartney because as he said 'No one was listening...'
@@davidtalany2153 I've never fully bought into that theory that the Beatles were challenged as live performances because "they couldn't hear themselves sing". There are plenty of cases where they performed in front of audiences that didn't scream and yell. Just one example is the Japanese Budokahn shows in 1966. The audiences were relatively quiet yet the Beatles turned in absolutely dreadful performances. To me I've never been a fan of the Beatles live shows. I've watched zillions of them on RUclips and although they were better in some performances than others at the end of the day they didn't impress me.
Ed Sullivan did a lot to promote 60's pop music and he did a phenomenal job in helping black artists get exposure. You're right though, Ed Sullivan liked the Beatles a lot better. Anyway, I looked at this video again and it's obvious Ed Sullivan's attention is caught a few times and he doesn't seem happy in what he is seeing. It looked like the shadow of the curtain starting going down. So maybe he was looking at that or the Producer to see if the next act would be ready to go on stage. He also is looking at the audience a little. He didn't want things to get out of hand in the audience. Remember this is a LIVE show done on LIVE TV. This isn't done anymore today and hasn't been done in decades. It was a HUGE undertaking.
Lockemeister agreed about how Sullivan promoted 60's musical acts. His show brought all those acts into our living rooms nearly every Sunday night and that was awesome. However... for that promotion he demanded and I think rightly respect for his show and his efforts. He had Elvis filmed from the waist down... told the Stones on another occasion to clean up the lyrics on Lets Spend the Night Together. Someone commented on this video it's the last time Charlie Watts was caught smiling. Charlie is playing perfectly out of time with the backing track... his stick on the snare hits the rim only never the drum itself... and having a pretty good laugh about it. Yup... Backing track. This was live TV and to get it right in one take... crucial. Check out RUclips video with Dave Clark 5 backing track failure. Ed could spot disrespect from across the street or across the stage. Charlie is effing around and Ed is pissed about it.
. Seeing this I'm reminded that the Rolling Stones weren't an especially good looking group of young men (in comparison, they made the Beatles look like a bunch of George Clooney's !!)........and, unfortunately, when you start out behind the eight ball in that particular department (i.e., "looks"), old age has a way of making it even WORSE !! That said, they never seemed to be lacking for the company of PLENTY of good looking women.....so fame, obviously, DOES have its rewards !! ;-) .
Oh geez...ok, my first impressions. They all look weird. Mich Jagger looks horrible and he is young here. Also, why is the drummer off beat, and yet the drums sound on time? Were they not playing and listening to the recording and just singing with the recording? Wow, I don't get it. Their voices are in sync but the drummer is not on time.
Um, not sure what you were expecting here. LOL Yeah, it's a different era and stars of that time didn't look as polished as they would today. The Rolling Stones were a rough looking group and that was part of their appeal. They were like the bad boys you didn't take home to mom. This was just coming out of a time where rock and roll stars were expected to wear suits and ties and these were scruffy looking young British guys playing guttural blues music. In terms of the music, yeah, they most likely sang over a prerecorded track, as did many acts of the time.
@@mr.k905 I disagree, the voices appear to be in sync, but when you look at the drummer, its totally off...he's totally off with the rest of the group. Obviously, its a recorded track but the drummer is the time keeper so I just don't get where he was...its mind blowing.
@@zyxwut321 I was expecting upkeep...Mick looks like he hadn't slept for days and stoned. Hey, even back then band leaders were concerned on their appearance and how they came across. These guys, or at least Mick was not. As for the rest of info I mentioned, you have already agreed on the prerecorded track so not much to add to this.
@@TheBohemianAngels ??? Dude! How would that even be possible?? It’s a LIVE recording/filming. The WHOLE video is simply off with the audio troughout it’s entirely. Go watch the original (black and white). Everything is 100% the same but in sync there.
I was lucky to see The Stones in December of 1965 Sacramento, California....I was 10....my mom loved rocknroll..so she took me.....I was one lucky kid.....remember it well.....
My dad hated and the stones and no, my mom would not be caught dead if she even thought about taking me to see the Stones. I was 10 in 1965.
@@joedebaun4547 My mom was a newly divorced single parent at age 33 my dad lived 3 hours away and I’m sure he wouldn’t have approved ....but mom ruled.....mom took me to see 11 rock concerts between 1965-67 I saw all the main groups of the time except for the Beatles & few others like The Kinks, Paul Revere & the Raiders & Beach Boys......I absolutely am so happy I was able to see these groups at a young age.....
Real lucky
Keith Richards looked a little like George Harrison back then
A fake George Harrison lol!!
@@petermartinez4748 I was just thinking that, when I saw your comment!
@@petermartinez4748 al LOVE George harrison
Yeah and now Keith’s face looks like the surface of Death Valley.
@@petermartinez4748 And the real Keith Richard!
Nice to see Charlie smiling!
RIP Charlie, we gonna miss you!
What a decade, music, films, style, so many memorable happenings, the 1960s.
Never seen Keith Richards looking so clear headed hahaha
56 years later and the Stones are still officially active. Whoever would have thought back then eh ?
Con 10 años compraron el mundo okey
“rock and roll is here to stay, it will never die...”. Danny and the Juniors late 50’s I think...so someone did think it would last.
Very rare in these videos they actually had the camera on the lead guitarist during a solo!!
One of their great early hits! And I love that Teardrop guitar that Brian Jones is playing the main riff on. I heard it’s worth over 200k now.
Incredible!
Vox guitar.
Cool old times! R.ip Charlie Watts (1941-2021)
These guys are good. They could go places.
nice to see the original lineup with brian
Colour ...amazing tech... Wonder when they will come up with the technology to have the music in sync.
Never seen this before in color thanks!!
Quite possibly the last time Charlie smiled.
Watch the concerts, he smiles all the time.
@@rcpsammy7186 it's a joke, jesus...
@@Muerte2715 I know what a joke is, triggered....it responded to me.
I live for Charlie's smiles ; )
@@lindalovesmusic9091 It's so pretty good
・・ストーンズのこの映像は初めて観た♪。
チャーリーはしかし・・シンプル過ぎだろう～。
ブライアンも地味で大人しいなぁ。
ビルは・・いつものとおりでしたぁ。
アップ感謝。
looks better in Black and White
It was the cheapest to catch filming, anywhere. In black and white. Think about the filming of "The Wizard Of Oz" in '39.
@@kimsullivan5576 no I'm thinking of the way it was originally aired when I saw it back then!
Mick look like a guy who forget to sleep the last night.
Tas wey
Love that "dark-halo" effect in this colorization!!! Awesome sauce!!! :) :) :) :)
It's called "bloom" and it was always a bit of a problem with early video tape. It's also why reflections nearly wash out the whole screen. Since video tape has an infinite frame-rate, it amplifies bright signals like that to infinty. Later Quadruplex systems found a way around this with signal limiters and filters. Remember, video tape was still a fairly new technology in 1965.
@@That_AMC_Guy Thanks a "whopple!!!" A "whopple" is what I call a one (1) followed by a million zeros. :) :)
More please!!! Thank you...
The first great song they wrote.
Maybe Ruby Tuesday before?
@@Methilde the last time was written in 1965 ruby Tuesday was written in 1966
@@trash6219 I confused with As tears go by in 1964, composed for M. Faithfull.
Listen to the Staple singers ‘this could be the last time ‘I’ve known the Stones one since I was 6 (1967) but I just discovered the Stapes one a year ago. It’s okay Robert Johnson took Sweet Home Chicago from Kokomo Arnold’s Kokomo Blues. Ain’t nothing new under the sun. It’s all great music. 😎
AWESOME
Brian Jones guitar should have mixed louder. The Stones were the best when He was in the band. Keith Richards broke a string at the end of his solo. That's why his rhythm guitar dropped out. He then wisely turned down the volume of his guitar so it would not be out of tune.
Ed had one of those rare shows where the bands actually played live: no lip synch. Took techs some years to get sound mix and all right. I agree would have been nice, but we were happy getting about anything live back then
Amazing how some people can second guess this rather than enjoying it. Nature of U tube I guess. Critics paradise.
The camera barely showed Brian and Bill. I've noticed that before in these clips of the early Stones. Brian and Bill basically just stood there, so the cameramen focused Mick and Keith, because they were more interesting visually.
@@JohnMcDonnell camera usely focused on the frontman since always.
@@Methilde Yes, absolutely. But there are also more shots of Charlie and Keith. They were doing more than just standing there like Brian. Brian always looks uncomfortable on camera to me.
"In the fall of 1969, Ed Sullivan flew to Hollywood where the touring Rolling Stones were to tape three performances at CBS Television City. With their new guitarist onboard they performed “Gimme Shelter” and “Love in Vain” from their latest album, Let It Bleed, along with their new hit single “Honky Tonk Women.” The performance aired on November 23, 1969 and also featured jazz legend Ella Fitzgerald on The Ed Sullivan Show. That would mark the last time The Rolling Stones appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show."
King Charlie always the coolest stone
Awesome!!! :)
.waoo Que buena rola y que buenos tiempos con el show de Ed sulivan.
Charlie looks like Javier Barden! Hahaha
Is it just me, or does this song sound like "Bittersweet Symphony" by the Verve? ;)
I saw them in 66 in Chicago. This is a nice looking set. Before they drugged out too.
I think these guys have a future
A little syncing issue. The drum snare goes down before you hear it. When you look at the singing the lips look okay except in a couple spots. It's just a little off, no big deal.
So why comment?
Brian Hopkins Jones = The Rolling Stones
Stones sounding a little thin without the studio behind them, but nice crystal chandeliers.
I wonder why that thin sound on live performances was so typical then. Maybe the producers refused to allow much volume from the amps. I also suspect they lacked the knowledge of proper amp miking techniques then too.
Aye they're in fine form here
Beatles greatest pop band ever..Stones greatest rock band ever..
Both are rock bands..but Beatles is mostly pop/rock and the Stones is more to Blues/Rock
Old Stones where the Best ..
See, this is the sort of upscaled video that really does not look good. Everyone looks like a weird hybrid between cartoon and real-life, I'm not sure how to describe it. Good effort though
Colouring, shading, the the video and sound are misaligned by ~.6 seconds
Uncanny valley material
Melhor fase dos STONES, indiscutívelmente
Não kkkk de 1968-1974 foi melhor, embora eles sejam fodas em todas as fases
@@luiz7993 Bom dia Luis,ocorre que os Stones, contava com Lewis Brian Hopkins Jones,que na realidade tocava , mais de 30 instrumentos, evidentemente, torna-se de extrema relevante,contar com um músico com este calibre
Aftermath e Banquete dos Mendigos (Beggars Banguet), são os melhores álbuns,apesar de ter comprado primeiramente,em 1966,o LP A Tears Go By (december's Children ),Na decada de 60, para, conseguir o disco dos Stones, tomava um suador, até porque,os representantes
ou melhor,os executivos de algumas empresas (gravadoras), exemplicando, especificamente a London no Brasil, consideravam muito arriscado,investirem, em conjuntos, que ainda estavam despontando no cenário musical,em especial,o Ie, Ie, Ie. Conquanto,fui obrigado a deslocar-me até a cidade de São Paulo,para poder comprar o disco
Em suma,neste ano de 1966, Luís Paulo Bagé, (influência dele),havia dito que procurar discos dos Stones, somente em São Paulo. A melhor loja de discos da capital do Rio de Janeiro, sempre destacava-se a Moto Disco s,com várias filiais, espalhadas no Rio de Janeiro.
Saw them only once. Soldier Field '77. Some Girls.
78
Just glad that they're NOT LIP SYNCHING! It's LIVE!!!
Charlie Watts has always been an oldman.
Brian was THE ROLLING STONE
Bill's way to play the bass is so weird.
The other two dudes are the clean version of Mick and Keith
When the Stones were Great!
The world's greatest rock and roll band.
I like it better black and white
This was not their last appearance on the Sullivan Show.
Shouldn't the guitars be coming through louder? They sound way to quiet to me.
Three-quarters into the song, I'm like, "Wait, is this in color?"
Charlie play snare at left hand different
12.21.20. I remember my older sister, liking Mick Jagger & the Rolling Stones better than the Beatles, I was a little kid about seven years old when she graduated from high school June 1965. We watched the Ed Sullivan show every weekend but my dad never cared for the newer groups or younger people and their style of music, he was stuck in his 1940s big band era, it’s not that it’s bad music, but it wasn’t my sisters and my era’s. music.
did you got to any concerts?
@@ctrlshiftqq9846 12.21.20. Never to a Stone’s concert 🎵.
You gotta choose in life: Stones or Beatles. It can't be both ways.
@@RobCummings You'r right my older brother was Beatles and me Stones we used to fight (gently) about.
This was NOT their last time on ES.
the song name buddy
that screwed me up too! I was like...what about the "Let's Spend Some Time Together" Ordeal?
They're pretty good but I like The who WAY MORE !!!
Mick kind of looks like Ringo Starr in this
Do you need glasses?
Oh, I thought this was their last appearance on the show
Brian Jones.❤️😧
They'll probably be alright without Ed. Seems to be some talent there.
They were right. It was the last time.
Keith at 25-normal looking 25 year old dude
Keith at 30-70 year old man
Keith at 70-nornal looking 70 year old dude 😂
impresionante, pero Brian no ligó un primer plano. raro siendo que era el más lindo del grupo (!?)
Funny looking characters those stones..
Jagger could easily act without makeup in one of the episodes of the film "Wrong Turn".
The bad boys of the British Invasion. Girls, you don't bring home a Rolling Stone to meet Mom and Dad.....LOL.
Why can't AI synchronize?
Is this Live?
Whoever was in charge of the sound and levels on Ed's show sucked bad!
Hahah! You go back to 1965 and do better with what they had. TV studios, even big ones like CBS in New York were not set up to record a live band. It took them YEARS to catch up.
Keep in mind too that TV was MONO back then and 99% of acts were not musical groups. I'd love to see you mix three guitars, three vocal mikes and a drum kit to mono, without overdriving the signal with NO compression and at best; using a three-input board.
Good luck, Expert.
@@That_AMC_Guy they seemed to do alright with show tunes and a however many piece orchestra...
Shame Brian's guitar is lost in the mix
Not much bass in the mix either.
Was Charlie in the bathroom?
well i can't believe they plagarized bittersweet symphony in 65
Upscale, colorized, enhanced, restored and out of synch
1:53
Great live act! The Stones were much better live than the Beatles, who often times had problems recreating their studio recordings on stage.
The Stones were great live early on and then they got lazy from the 70s on. They sucked live after about 74! Also the Beatles could barely hear themselves play because of all the idiots screaming and crying, which is one of the reasons they stopped touring according to McCartney because as he said 'No one was listening...'
@@davidtalany2153 I've never fully bought into that theory that the Beatles were challenged as live performances because "they couldn't hear themselves sing". There are plenty of cases where they performed in front of audiences that didn't scream and yell. Just one example is the Japanese Budokahn shows in 1966. The audiences were relatively quiet yet the Beatles turned in absolutely dreadful performances. To me I've never been a fan of the Beatles live shows. I've watched zillions of them on RUclips and although they were better in some performances than others at the end of the day they didn't impress me.
@@douglasleftwich3936 Stones at the same time had public screaming and jumping on stage but as a real live band they never stop, cause they like it.
Ya waited the whole week, hoping you didnt screw up, and no TV on Sundae nite.
Plugged into thin air
It looks to me like Ed Sullivan liked the Beatles a lot more... He looks angry here. But a great Stones performance, so... take that Mr. Sullivan!
Ed Sullivan did a lot to promote 60's pop music and he did a phenomenal job in helping black artists get exposure. You're right though, Ed Sullivan liked the Beatles a lot better. Anyway, I looked at this video again and it's obvious Ed Sullivan's attention is caught a few times and he doesn't seem happy in what he is seeing. It looked like the shadow of the curtain starting going down. So maybe he was looking at that or the Producer to see if the next act would be ready to go on stage. He also is looking at the audience a little. He didn't want things to get out of hand in the audience. Remember this is a LIVE show done on LIVE TV. This isn't done anymore today and hasn't been done in decades. It was a HUGE undertaking.
Lockemeister agreed about how Sullivan promoted 60's musical acts. His show brought all those acts into our living rooms nearly every Sunday night and that was awesome. However... for that promotion he demanded and I think rightly respect for his show and his efforts. He had Elvis filmed from the waist down... told the Stones on another occasion to clean up the lyrics on Lets Spend the Night Together.
Someone commented on this video it's the last time Charlie Watts was caught smiling. Charlie is playing perfectly out of time with the backing track... his stick on the snare hits the rim only never the drum itself... and having a pretty good laugh about it. Yup... Backing track. This was live TV and to get it right in one take... crucial. Check out RUclips video with Dave Clark 5 backing track failure. Ed could spot disrespect from across the street or across the stage. Charlie is effing around and Ed is pissed about it.
Richards before a body filled w heroine
Bill’s gum
I know! He's just so cool.. holding that guitar straight up!
@@lindalovesmusic9091 it’s a bass but it’s ok haha
@@charalampostseronis6500 Oops, yes I know! But its still a 'guitar' just 2 less strings.
good job Harold Shipman isn’t around to do covid injections...
He was an avid supporter of artistic talent. What have you done?
nothing..
@@MegaNavek Long speach to say nothing.
Looks like the sound has been thrown in from some other performance. Terrible.
The only terrible thing around here is your rude comment and attitude.
@@lemurianchick Maybe your attitude is much more terrible, let people give they opinions.
.
Seeing this I'm reminded that the Rolling Stones weren't an especially good looking group of young men (in comparison, they made the Beatles look like a bunch of George Clooney's !!)........and, unfortunately, when you start out behind the eight ball in that particular department (i.e., "looks"), old age has a way of making it even WORSE !!
That said, they never seemed to be lacking for the company of PLENTY of good looking women.....so fame, obviously, DOES have its rewards !! ;-)
.
Mick Jagger had a face made for a bag or pantyhose as in a robber.
I think Brian Jones got a raw deal with the Stones, but in this presentation his facial expression is kind of creepy. He's too stoic.
Oh geez...ok, my first impressions. They all look weird. Mich Jagger looks horrible and he is young here. Also, why is the drummer off beat, and yet the drums sound on time? Were they not playing and listening to the recording and just singing with the recording? Wow, I don't get it. Their voices are in sync but the drummer is not on time.
Um, not sure what you were expecting here. LOL Yeah, it's a different era and stars of that time didn't look as polished as they would today. The Rolling Stones were a rough looking group and that was part of their appeal. They were like the bad boys you didn't take home to mom. This was just coming out of a time where rock and roll stars were expected to wear suits and ties and these were scruffy looking young British guys playing guttural blues music. In terms of the music, yeah, they most likely sang over a prerecorded track, as did many acts of the time.
NOTHING is in sync here. Picture is half a second or so behind the sound.
@@mr.k905 I disagree, the voices appear to be in sync, but when you look at the drummer, its totally off...he's totally off with the rest of the group. Obviously, its a recorded track but the drummer is the time keeper so I just don't get where he was...its mind blowing.
@@zyxwut321 I was expecting upkeep...Mick looks like he hadn't slept for days and stoned. Hey, even back then band leaders were concerned on their appearance and how they came across. These guys, or at least Mick was not. As for the rest of info I mentioned, you have already agreed on the prerecorded track so not much to add to this.
@@TheBohemianAngels ??? Dude! How would that even be possible?? It’s a LIVE recording/filming. The WHOLE video is simply off with the audio troughout it’s entirely. Go watch the original (black and white). Everything is 100% the same but in sync there.
Jesus. You can tell that Ed Sullivan did NOT care very much for young people. 😂
Pretty sure some lip syncing going on here
No lip sync on Sullivan
@@timdailey2690 If so, some audio not synced to the video at times.
ever see the sync go off on digital videos made from analog videos? It happens all the time. This is a live performance
Unlike when the Beatles did Ed Sullivan, mick is lip synching
Mick is not lip synching here, this is live.
No he’s not!
@@BigSky1 ....obviously you don't know very much. This is as live as you're gonna get.
Are you crazy or just can’t read. I said he’s not, meaning he’s not lip synching. He is singing live!
@@eightinches6094 I was replying to Chris Elms and not you.
They just wanted to be known as something more than just another bunch of pretty faces...
Nunca van asuperar alos beatles sorry
lol
Hola Paul !! Que haces comentando aqui en RUclips? Todo bien?
Hola Paul tienes toda la razón ustedes siempre serán insuperable con tan solo 10años se ganaron el mundo genios por siempre querido Paul vida eterna
The sync is horrible on this.
LOL Charlie looks 45 yet he probably 21
24
Play back fajuto esse
weones fomes!
playing drums in those days with these type groups weren't so hard
Mick is so cute but he has no rhythm.
Brian Freaking Jones
Brian Jones or gtfo
Mick Taylor = the only true lead guitar player they've had.
Never seen an uglier bunch. lol