Explorer, Pilot & CX-90: Who Wins the 3-Row SUV Battle?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • Did this video Help?
    Show your appreciation and Buy Me a Coffee - www.buymeacoff...
    OSR Garage compiled 3 of the Top 7-seater SUVs. Which is the BEST 3-Row SUV?
    The 2023 Ford Explorer XLT, 2023 Honda Pilot Trailsport, and 2024 Mazda CX-90 Turbo S are all three-row midsize SUVs that offer a variety of features and amenities. Here is a comparison of their specs:
    Engine: The Explorer XLT is powered by a 2.3-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 300 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. The Pilot Trailsport is powered by a 3.5-liter V6 engine that produces 285 horsepower and 262 lb-ft of torque. The CX-90 Turbo S is powered by a 3.3-liter turbocharged inline-six engine that produces 400 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque.
    Transmission: All three SUVs come standard with an eight-speed automatic transmission.
    Fuel economy: The Explorer XLT gets an EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway. The Pilot Trailsport gets an EPA-estimated 19 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway. The CX-90 Turbo S gets an EPA-estimated 18 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway.
    Seating capacity: All three SUVs can seat up to eight passengers.
    Cargo space: The Explorer XLT has 18.2 cubic feet of cargo space behind the third row, 65.7 cubic feet with the third row folded down, and 182.3 cubic feet with both rows folded down. The Pilot Trailsport has 16.5 cubic feet of cargo space behind the third row, 48.4 cubic feet with the third row folded down, and 145.5 cubic feet with both rows folded down. The CX-90 Turbo S has 14.4 cubic feet of cargo space behind the third row, 42.7 cubic feet with the third row folded down, and 108.7 cubic feet with both rows folded down.
    Features: The Explorer XLT comes standard with features such as a 10.1-inch touchscreen infotainment system, a six-speaker sound system, a rearview camera, and cloth seats. The Pilot Trailsport comes standard with features such as a 9-inch touchscreen infotainment system, a nine-speaker sound system, a rearview camera, and cloth seats. The CX-90 Turbo S comes standard with features such as a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, a 10.25-inch touchscreen infotainment system, a 12-speaker Bose sound system, a surround-view camera system, and leather seats.
    Price: The Explorer XLT starts at $36,760. The Pilot Trailsport starts at $38,930. The CX-90 Turbo S starts at $46,900.
    Overall, the 2023 Ford Explorer XLT, 2023 Honda Pilot Trailsport, and 2024 Mazda CX-90 Turbo S are all great choices for a three-row midsize SUV. They offer a variety of features and amenities, and they all have their own unique strengths. The Explorer XLT is a good choice for those looking for a powerful and versatile SUV. The Pilot Trailsport is a good choice for those looking for a comfortable and spacious SUV. The CX-90 Turbo S is a good choice for those looking for a luxurious and performance-oriented SUV.
    ** For Business or Collaboration interests - Contact me at offtheshelfrides@gmail.com **
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 20

  • @SylentONE
    @SylentONE 10 месяцев назад +3

    It's great to see the explorer finally has some competition looks wise

  • @ishanr5153
    @ishanr5153 Год назад +4

    Cx90 ❤

  • @georgepaniagua6115
    @georgepaniagua6115 Год назад +1

    Great comparison and review.

  • @R2sojr09
    @R2sojr09 9 месяцев назад +2

    We are looking between Pilot, Hylander or Explorer. Think we’re going with the Pilot. Nothing beats Hondas reliability.

    • @offtheshelfrides
      @offtheshelfrides  9 месяцев назад +2

      Yes Hondas are very reliable. I just felt the Pilot was underpowered. I will be getting in the Telluride and Grand Highlander around Christmas. Here is a Full Review of the CX-90. Not the same from this video.

  • @phuctong5628
    @phuctong5628 4 месяца назад

    Mazda screen still need to use physical buttons and control knobs, make me think about Audi lol:))) Asian’s Audis

  • @kdomster9141
    @kdomster9141 Год назад +1

    Nice comparison except you are not driving inline6 version worth 61K dollars here , you are in mid 50s version with 4 cyl engine and hybrid with 323hp not the inline 6 340hp you are referring to.
    Please correct your video as lot of Mazda floks will correct you 😉

    • @kdomster9141
      @kdomster9141 Год назад

      Please let us know Pilot torque numbers as it is 100 lbs/ft less than Mazda and it is where the power feels so sluggish on it ...
      Honda things that 10 speed will be enough to overcome lack of torque and it is not . Torque is the real power .

    • @offtheshelfrides
      @offtheshelfrides  Год назад

      I understand, there was confusion with what their spec sheet said and the Moroney sticker they gave us. We only had 20 minutes with them. If I could alter the video, I would but it is not possible after loading and I didn't see the error until after someone mentioned it. Our spec sheet listed it as the Hybrid version, but the window sticker they emailed us said the 6cyl turbo s....I should have investigated better. Hopefully, I will be able to do a full review later this fall.

    • @kdomster9141
      @kdomster9141 Год назад

      @@offtheshelfrides No worries , keep in mind model you drove is 550lbs heavier than inline6 3.3t , and it affects handling and ride quality .

    • @offtheshelfrides
      @offtheshelfrides  Год назад

      Hey, just wanted to let you know, I went back to the window sticker for this vehicle. It is the 3.3l inline turbo with 340 hp. it also has what the list as an M Hybrid Boost. So it is a traditional hybrid not the plug-in hybrid 4cyl.

    • @ryrys99
      @ryrys99 Год назад

      The one in the video is definitely the plug in hybrid (323 hp). You can see the PHEV badge on the front fender. The 340 hp inline 6 has its own badge, and color matched fenders. Make sure you put it in Sport Mode next time you get an opportunity to rip around in one! Nice review otherwise!

  • @aaronb1301
    @aaronb1301 8 месяцев назад

    I like the Pilot, love the CX-90, and loath the Explorer. The Honda and Mazda are quality products. The Ford ecoboost engines are junk.

    • @offtheshelfrides
      @offtheshelfrides  8 месяцев назад

      I liked the looks of the Pilot, but felt it lacked power. We owned an explorer, but we had the hybrid, it seemed much more stable. The cx-90 is great. If you haven't seen, I have a full CX-90 review - ruclips.net/video/Jo_js19XoPM/видео.htmlsi=mYWAVBWGoY-tL_8c
      And also the 2024 Kia Telluride - ruclips.net/video/CDSl_lUVLQo/видео.htmlsi=pQrvLbCdfJX3L90a

  • @tjn5845
    @tjn5845 Год назад +1

    That Explorer is one cheap looking SUV.....Ford should be embarrassed

    • @offtheshelfrides
      @offtheshelfrides  Год назад

      They are actually pretty nice

    • @R2sojr09
      @R2sojr09 6 месяцев назад

      The Explorer body caused every mid size suv these days to make a version of it. Honestly look at the Explorer and compare the body to everyone else in its size. You’ll laugh. The Pilot is Explorer in front and Durango in the back lol.