Affordable luxury | PerpetuaL C-05 review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @timeandnourishment1961
    @timeandnourishment1961 5 месяцев назад +2

    The added complications just show the excellence of the original Venus 175 movement.
    I've had my Seagull 1963 for about 3 years; by no means a daily , it's just started to gain a bit of time, though the chronograph bits still work perfectly. I'm waiting for another one from Proxima, who claim to oil and regulate their movements. We'll see.
    Great video. Its a beautiful watch, though I'm not so sure about the T - shirt. Cheers

  • @megasoid
    @megasoid 5 месяцев назад +2

    Thanks Toni. You convinced me to purchase a Regulator from this brand and I have no regrets 🎉

    • @themicrobrandexpert
      @themicrobrandexpert  5 месяцев назад +1

      So glad you like it, Fred! Thank you, once again, for all your wonderful support!

  • @GEMSofGOD_com
    @GEMSofGOD_com 5 месяцев назад

    You're both the first person I immediately wanted to subscribe to *again* AND the first person whose headline I find so honest and cool I'd subscribe to you immediately without watching. But the watch looks AMAZING.

  • @theloniousmonkiv5982
    @theloniousmonkiv5982 5 месяцев назад

    Been waiting to see some videos on this brand… thanks! 🙏🏾

    • @themicrobrandexpert
      @themicrobrandexpert  5 месяцев назад

      Make sure you check my other two Perpetual reviews. Thank you for watching!

  • @sivanstar
    @sivanstar 5 месяцев назад

    Wooohooo 2k!
    Some sea gull movements are more reliable than others. I havent heard of anyone that his sea gull st19 movement watch survived the 1 year (the 1963) and thats why i dont have one in my collection, especially on everyday use.
    I heard someone unpack it and activated and deactivated the chrono and it stopped working. idk how micros use this movement honestly, do they service and adjust it like Alex does?
    Anyways
    Alex, when i try to reccomend and show your website to people i get perpetual calender watches on google so thank you for the link (Toni) but im sure your website could get more exposre otherwise. Would love to own a regulator in the future.. It will happen.. :)

    • @themicrobrandexpert
      @themicrobrandexpert  5 месяцев назад +1

      2k, brother, indeed!
      Ihad my own feedback about the website, but Alex is too much of an old school guy, for the good and the worse 😉
      As for the micros using it, maybe now, with this knowledge, I guess people can understand why they are charging 500 plus, against the 150 alix companies do.

    • @sivanstar
      @sivanstar 5 месяцев назад

      @@themicrobrandexpert yaap now it makes very sense thx :)

  • @kaykay3342
    @kaykay3342 5 месяцев назад

    I love my perpetual sc the case size isn't a problem even on a 6.5 inch wrist

    • @themicrobrandexpert
      @themicrobrandexpert  5 месяцев назад

      That's a very peculiar case profile, happy it works on your wrist!

  • @E_D_43
    @E_D_43 5 месяцев назад

    Great information. Thanks.

  • @Walnutman5700
    @Walnutman5700 5 месяцев назад +1

    Seems like alot of work to make that movement work right. I'm not sure it makes me feel better about the movement. Too bad he couldn't have picked a better quality movement to start with. I wouldn't want to stake my company's reputation on this movement even after doctoring it up.

    • @themicrobrandexpert
      @themicrobrandexpert  5 месяцев назад

      For all its problems, one has to acknowledge the immense contribution ST calibers had in "democratising" the mechanical chronograph.

    • @Walnutman5700
      @Walnutman5700 5 месяцев назад

      Very true sir! But I'd even do a mechaquartz instead. Thanks for your review. It was terrific.

  • @DutchWatchChannel
    @DutchWatchChannel 5 месяцев назад

    Great review, not my cup of thee. But i agree that there is a lot of value on the table here with great complications offered by a good regulated Seagull movement 👌

  • @Just_Radu
    @Just_Radu 5 месяцев назад

    Hai cu aalgoritmul ! :D

  • @LenHere
    @LenHere 5 месяцев назад +1

    The ST1901 is junk. I had to repair my chronograph. Watchmaker found the pushers are too short. Plus, human rights matter. Here’s what happened to my 1963: My Seagull 1963 Needed Repair #watchcollectors
    ruclips.net/video/YAOcSU4xeF8/видео.html

    • @themicrobrandexpert
      @themicrobrandexpert  5 месяцев назад

      I hope I made it clear in the video that the ST19 calibers should only be installed by people that know what they're doing which is not what AliExpress brands are. In fact, your watchmaker all but confirms my conclusion.

    • @sivanstar
      @sivanstar 5 месяцев назад

      Thank you! i watched your video a few months ago and decided the 1963 isnt for me..