Why field watches are the only real tool watches left

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 1,2 тыс.

  • @elrockerchido
    @elrockerchido 11 месяцев назад +256

    The burger analogy is by far the best thing I’ve heard in a long time. Ill carry this analogy to more aspects of my life

    • @wifine1951
      @wifine1951 11 месяцев назад +2

      when did he say it

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад +20

      Who doesn't like a burger... ?😃😂

    • @patrickclancy150
      @patrickclancy150 10 месяцев назад

      @@wifine1951 13:30

    • @crux314
      @crux314 10 месяцев назад +3

      Perhaps "fish and chips" would be more likely. No body wants his/ her watch to be inexpensive junk.

    • @patrickclancy150
      @patrickclancy150 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@crux314 Not sure of your location, except that the "fish and chips" reference implies UK. Here is the US there are routine fast food burgers that might be classified as inexpensive junk, but we have many good restaurants that serve burgers that would make you rethink your desire for seafood.

  • @etebol
    @etebol 8 месяцев назад +85

    Thanks for being you. Too many flamboyant youtubers. Your style of communication is truly appreciated.

  • @CaptainWillard830
    @CaptainWillard830 11 месяцев назад +447

    I served in the United States Marine Corps for 22 years. I went to the field to train and to do real world Marine things. Afghanistan, Iraq, Philippines, Sri Lanka…I wore Timex Ironmans. When I wasn’t in the field, I wore my TAGs. Watches my wife gifted me every time I was promoted. All of the watches have a story. My wife purchased all of my TAGs at the Marine Corps Exchange

    • @watchpickle2k
      @watchpickle2k 11 месяцев назад +18

      Just out of curiosity... did you chose them and she paid for them? It would drive me mad if my wife would buy watches for me, because it is totally subjective and even a function of time, whether you will like and wear a watch.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад +33

      Thanks for sharing. My guess is those watches have a lot of memories attached to them 😃

    • @CaptainWillard830
      @CaptainWillard830 11 месяцев назад

      @@watchpickle2k she selected them without my input. Thankfully, my old lady has always had great taste and knows what I like. I’ll be honest, I was so busy back then with work, I rarely thought about what to wear as far as civilian attire and accessories. When I wasn’t in USMC attire (dress, utilities, or physical training attire), I was in khaki trousers, sensible shoes, polo or button down shirts, and not concerned at all about trendy fashion. I did once want a Rolex Submariner, but never could afford it with two little kids, and a wife, to take care of. Today, I can afford a Rolex, but now love my Omegas, TAGs, Seikos, and Casios. Maybe one day my wife will gift me a Rolex

    • @yarly3180
      @yarly3180 10 месяцев назад +8

      Maybe she bought her lovers Rolexes? *badum tsss*

    • @CaptainWillard830
      @CaptainWillard830 10 месяцев назад +32

      @@yarly3180 Good old Jody! He gets around with that mullet and smooth talk. Running around with Submariners, greasy hair, STDs, and Crocs

  • @amilyester
    @amilyester 10 месяцев назад +84

    I just got into watches recently and my first purchase was a Citizen 37mm Garrison Chandler. Eco Drive movement for no fuss operation/maintenance, legible Arabic numerals on a stark, black dial, basic lume, day-date feature, an arrow in place of the 12 and 100M WR on the stock canvas strap. Works for me. Simple and effective.

    • @johncooper7663
      @johncooper7663 3 месяца назад

      That’s a sharp watch. Like the white face version

    • @angowT
      @angowT 3 месяца назад +3

      Fantastic watch. I bought one while my Rolex datejust was being serviced ( £650). The Citizen is now my most reliable and bulletproof watch, superior to my Rolex in every way.

  • @billymania11
    @billymania11 11 месяцев назад +46

    Rocking a Hamilton Bronze Khaki here, a gift from my son. I adore it. Upon my demise, the watch enters his collection.

    • @vitmat7779
      @vitmat7779 6 месяцев назад +3

      There will be no demise - but you will merely fade away into the past

    • @tim001
      @tim001 6 месяцев назад +1

      I am currently thinking about buying it. Are you happy with it?

  • @danigomb
    @danigomb 11 месяцев назад +57

    I simply enjoy your eloquent explanations. I find it like great book material. Have a great time.

  • @donaldknapik2706
    @donaldknapik2706 11 месяцев назад +12

    I love listening to your analysis of different watch topics. I picked up a Bulova Hack about 9 months ago and it has become my daily driver. Its about half the price of a Khaki and the most accurate mechanical I own.

  • @bdcochran01
    @bdcochran01 11 месяцев назад +14

    1. Thank you. Your description is spot on.
    2. My daily beater watch is a 40 year old Wenger military field watch.
    3. Someone mention the Timex Ironman. I have 4 used ones. I have one remaining new one to gift. I give new Ironman watches as beater watches to high school and college graduates.

  • @nikolastojanov8749
    @nikolastojanov8749 11 месяцев назад +35

    I have been thinking about classifying watches into different categories and wearing watches on different occasions. This video made me realize that for me, its all about what emotions does a watch evoke when you put it on you hand. I am a lot into hiking, spending time in nature or at least parks, outdoor exercise of any kind, walking whenever I can. When I put on a field watch, it just evokes in me memories about hiking and nature and spending cool time with my parents in nature, generally very nice memories. Also, when I go exercise or do something in casual clothes in general, it just feels right to put on a field watch. When I dress more smartly for office, It just feels right to have a dressy watch on wrist. I dont wear divers for the most part except when I actually go swimming. Not sure why It works like that for me, its all about feeling 'right' and evoking the right emotion at the right time.

    • @nicedoppy2077
      @nicedoppy2077 4 месяца назад

      what model(s) dressy watch do u recommend ?

  • @FightArena8
    @FightArena8 11 месяцев назад +12

    It's refreshing to see a focus on functionality and simplicity over luxury in the watch world.

  • @pineconepig6426
    @pineconepig6426 8 месяцев назад +13

    I've had a Bertucci A-2T Classic since 2019. Best $110 I've ever spent. My job is outdoors. I've put this watch through snow and ice traversal, river rescue, tech SAR, backpacking, everyday bumps and knocks. It has held up and never let me down. Love it

    • @davidm.2141
      @davidm.2141 6 месяцев назад

      Bertucci is such an underrated brand for what it offers in the affordable range. I wear my Ventara 11069 (white dial) whenever I venture into the muck.

  • @miopera40
    @miopera40 10 месяцев назад +19

    citizen eco-drive field watch $100 15 years ago and still going, has gone through hell, oil sand, salt water, mud, 30+ meter dives on weekly basis. Light, small, simple, cheap, durable for sure and always on time with zero adjustments or maintenance. A set it once and forget it type.

    • @Ferien7
      @Ferien7 7 месяцев назад

      But is it readable in the dark? That watch has very poor lume

    • @miopera40
      @miopera40 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@Ferien7
      Mine is pretty good in the dark, maybe you bought a different model

    • @Ferien7
      @Ferien7 7 месяцев назад

      @@miopera40 mine is the 36mm black dial version with a red seconds hand. Not the same one?

    • @miopera40
      @miopera40 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@Ferien7
      probably the same, I haven't had issues at night with it but to be fair most of the beating it takes is on day time.

  • @boatdetective
    @boatdetective 11 месяцев назад +10

    Mike- your discussions are prescient, intelligent, and unbiased. I have been yearning for a field watch and have considered precisely what you discuss here. I would add that the best field watches are more than simply the design and construction. The best examples have a back story and an air of authenticity. Personally, I like the Ranger, the Hamilton 38 Murph, and the IWC Mk XV.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад

      I try, and am happy you enjoy my approach 😃😃 IWC for me.... 😃😃

  • @TheMutchlerchad
    @TheMutchlerchad 11 месяцев назад +41

    I love my Ranger. I enjoy having well made things that don't scream "luxury." As with many products, restraint in design often leads to a more fulfilling ownership experience. Don't get me wrong, there are times I like my watches a little more fancy, but sometimes, a quality understated tool is what I want. Thanks for the video.

    • @paulgregory2601
      @paulgregory2601 11 месяцев назад +2

      I love my RANGER aswell, superb piece 👍

    • @lohikarhu734
      @lohikarhu734 11 месяцев назад +1

      @TheMutchlerchad;
      I like understated, even "functional" appearance, but, where possible, some kind of "internal elegance"... the "field watch" genre (although i admit to having a day/date) is useful, readable, no battery to charge or replace, robust enough to wear wherever, whenever..and, for me, "luxury" is not something that i consider very much...if it looks like a "field watch", and is wonderfully well-made, and fits in the mould of "those who know, know, those who don't know, don't concern me.." maybe it's like the "de-badged" high-end Mercedes, or the not-so-obvious RS-6 "station wagon"?

    • @darrenbayman8988
      @darrenbayman8988 10 месяцев назад +2

      I love mine as well. The micro adjustment on the bracelet just works so well, and I find myself adjusting it at least a couple of times in the day.

    • @MrMaxc6po
      @MrMaxc6po 8 месяцев назад +1

      I totally agree but Went with the 2017 omega railmaster. Only the clasp is Better on the Tudor to my eyes but it still is a great piece…and affordable. The fact the railmaster is discontinued also means you won t see it everywhere

    • @RDD13St
      @RDD13St 3 месяца назад +1

      Well said 🎯

  • @nigelmattravers5913
    @nigelmattravers5913 11 месяцев назад +8

    I have a bronze Hamilton Khaki for the reason you mentioned- simplicity. I can wear and forget. It is light weight with an olive NATO strap, so I can wear it in the garden, at the side of a rugby pitch or working on the car.
    I do have a Bremont Broadsword as well. It is on a stainless steel bracelet, Bremont did not have an attractive strap when I bought it. A nice clear face but much heavier- heading towards a dress watch. Very rugged, it is the one I tend to wear when I am travelling, it covers all the bases for a business trip in Asia.

  • @Ego_Katana
    @Ego_Katana 11 месяцев назад +28

    Sinn makes some great field - tool watches. 556 and the 856!

  • @glebedigital4654
    @glebedigital4654 4 месяца назад +4

    I bought a CWC black dive watch in '96, through many adventures up mountains & down rivers it's been the perfect field watch, never let me down and is now beat up AF. Still keeps 2sec between battery changes, awesome bit of kit.

  • @davetripper
    @davetripper 5 месяцев назад +5

    I’ve watched dozens of watch videos in the last few weeks. This one is my favorite so far. I appreciate the informative, simple burger style presentation.

  • @bobgaston1
    @bobgaston1 6 месяцев назад +62

    I wore a Rolex Explorer for 30 months in Vietnam. Of course, the watch was priced at about $250.00 at the PX in 1966. The item is still in the family and still running.

    • @antonomaseapophasis5142
      @antonomaseapophasis5142 4 месяца назад +1

      Gallon of gas $0.20?

    • @bobgaston1
      @bobgaston1 4 месяца назад

      @@antonomaseapophasis5142 you are correct! That watch was a month’s pay for an Army sergeant. A sergeant in a combat zone is now making around $6,000. I’m guessing that’s about the retail price of an OP. Unfortunately the exchange system no longer carries Rolex. By the way, ground sirloin was about 3 pounds for a dollar.

    • @Tourist1967
      @Tourist1967 3 месяца назад

      @@bobgaston1 I was just looking at Explorers...either that or the strangely unloved Milgauss

    • @bobgaston1
      @bobgaston1 3 месяца назад +1

      @@Tourist1967 Be aware that the Sub without date, Air King, explorer, and OP all use the same movement. So unless you are in love with the face or you plan on doing some extreme diving, they are all essentially the same timepiece.

    • @AndSendMe
      @AndSendMe 3 месяца назад

      I love the 1016 above all others. Wish I had held out for one back when they were affordable.

  • @matricious
    @matricious 11 месяцев назад +14

    I've taken a dive into the watch world and at the end the only one which I ended up using on a daily basis is a 70€ Lorus Lumibrite with a day/date function.
    Convinience is what makes it stand out for me, even if it lacks all of Casio's functions. It does it's job quicker than a phone.

  • @dannysimenauer5745
    @dannysimenauer5745 11 месяцев назад +53

    I would just add one thing to Mike's thorough analysis/perspective of what makes a true "tool field watch" that Mike did not overtly state. A person who is buying a true field watch for its simplicity to read the time also wants to buy it as a "beater watch". Meaning I am going to use it at the gym, at a construction site (or other manual labor job), sweat in it, swim in it, biking with it, go rock climbing with it, even go to the office with it, or all of the above! The point being is that I want a watch that can be scratched or I can get dirty without worrying about babying it. The most important features are is it steel or titanium, and inexpensive to the point where I do not worry about scratching it. I guess a person who only wants to buy a field watch for its life style vibe would buy a Patek Philippe 5226 in white gold, but not someone who is going to beat the heck out of it in the field!

    • @theshadow1812
      @theshadow1812 11 месяцев назад +1

      GADA watch

    • @dannysimenauer5745
      @dannysimenauer5745 11 месяцев назад

      @@theshadow1812 GADA means/stands for?

    • @DavidMTurner
      @DavidMTurner 11 месяцев назад

      @@dannysimenauer5745 Go Anywhere Do Anything

    • @Iseu47
      @Iseu47 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@dannysimenauer5745it means "go anywhere, do anything"

    • @dannysimenauer5745
      @dannysimenauer5745 11 месяцев назад

      @@Iseu47 thanks!

  • @mortenblomandersen4041
    @mortenblomandersen4041 11 месяцев назад +19

    Well, I've got an Eterna Bumper produced in 1942. That watch has actually been 'in the field', which makesvit a true field watch

  • @andreasantonastaso5735
    @andreasantonastaso5735 11 месяцев назад +9

    Fantastic video, you couldn't use best words to explain why fild watches are definitely my favorite ones. Thank you for your work 👌

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад +1

      You are very welcome, and thanks for taking the time to say so 😃😃

  • @jimg518
    @jimg518 11 месяцев назад +67

    I had my heart set on a Ranger, then I saw the Sinn 556 A and went with that. A lot less money and a really good quality watch.

    • @dre32pitt
      @dre32pitt 9 месяцев назад +5

      How's the .223 model?

    • @clarkmackintosh891
      @clarkmackintosh891 7 месяцев назад

      If we’re talking value for money and real tool watches Sinn is a fantastic brand. Cases made with amagnetic German submarine steel. Great choice. The Ranger is a great watch too.

    • @Ruben-zzz
      @Ruben-zzz 4 месяца назад +1

      All i want is a Ranger in 36mm

    • @mike12ophone
      @mike12ophone 3 месяца назад

      not sure but the 300 blk is not as loud as the 556.​@@dre32pitt

    • @kalyansapsd1
      @kalyansapsd1 Месяц назад

      i love the 556 A more than the 556 i but that date window is a little bit off...that kept me away from getting it. Maybe i ll go with the 566 i RS in future but I am content with my kakhi field automatic

  • @stevehill8993
    @stevehill8993 11 месяцев назад +12

    Big fan of my two Hamiltons. They just feel perfect on my wrist. Large numerals are most appreciated.

  • @markikn3183
    @markikn3183 11 месяцев назад +10

    That was very good and got me thinking about my relationship with my Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic 42 on bracelet, which ive always loved. Busier then the mechanical, it also starts to push that boundary (slightly) but remains firmly toolish because...i only paid $500. And that's another essence of the field watch, it's important not to pay too much.

  • @thepacketnarc7634
    @thepacketnarc7634 7 месяцев назад +4

    You have a gift. Such a great cadence and delivery of the information. You could be reading the recipe from your grandmothers cookbook and it would be mesmerizing.
    Thank you for sharing watch info for us !

  • @johanvandersandt8904
    @johanvandersandt8904 11 месяцев назад +4

    Reminds me of the KISS saying... Keep it simple stupid... You get the basics right and then they will be superb. I probably like the Draken Aoraki most. Its well made... Its tough... It has a faraday cage in it... It a great field watch! Have a great one Mike!

  • @TheSlowoldman
    @TheSlowoldman 11 месяцев назад +5

    PP 5226 is GORGEOUS! I love that watch. I love plain faced watches, mainly with numerals at 12, 3, 6, and 9. (sometimes more like in the 5226). My daily wear tool (?) watch is a Timex Hodinkee Waterbury Limited Edition. I love the pebbled face of the dial and the simple legible dial layout.

  • @shoeshiRoll
    @shoeshiRoll 11 месяцев назад +52

    I have been in the US Infantry for the netter part of 9 years, and I have been absolutely thrilled to pick up a Rolex Explorer. I have had a deployment with this watch along with numberous training events where it gets thrashed left and right for the last two years.
    Using this watch as a tool watch, as it is originally intended, is what makes this piece so awesome.
    All the cool functions that come from a G-shock are cool and all, but we never use any of it in the real world; no need for the world time, no need for the stop watch function etc. We typically carry a GPS anyways that has all those functions. So why not train in style?
    The 100m water resistance gives me a lot of faith when working in harsh weather conditions and even during swim events.
    Even though it is a "luxury brand", i still think Rolex still has their head in the game for making some absolute beaters of a watch. When people say this watch can fit any situation, ill tell you what; it absolutely does.

    • @Tourist1967
      @Tourist1967 7 месяцев назад +1

      And there's always one whose alarm goes off, or it beeps or lights up like a Christmas tree at night...

  • @francoisfournier2903
    @francoisfournier2903 11 месяцев назад +5

    Just purchased a Christopher Ward C65 Sandhurst field watch and love everything about it. I also have a Hamilton titanium khaki field, and alternate between the two.

    • @daveLin104
      @daveLin104 10 месяцев назад

      How does it compare to the Hamilton?

  • @solverxd
    @solverxd 11 месяцев назад +7

    Excellent video. You've just given me another reason to love my 124270 Explorer even more.
    It really is about as luxurious as a field watch should be without compromising its role as a tool.

    • @ninjesus4079
      @ninjesus4079 11 месяцев назад

      it is labelled as a tool watch but let's be honest, it is luxury.
      A tool watch is a Gshock

    • @yusufbest4475
      @yusufbest4475 11 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@ninjesus4079 it is priced as luxury but it is just a good quality field watch

    • @Ferien7
      @Ferien7 7 месяцев назад

      @@yusufbest4475no, a g shock is far more accurate, durable, and reliable. Mechanical movements are delicate and fragile

  • @jbe6812
    @jbe6812 11 месяцев назад +7

    Great channel, arguably the most informed and seemingly least influenced out there, I congratulate you. However you have missed the Seiko SARB017. Arguably the purest and most functional field / alrounder of them all! Love the content 👌

    • @pergustavsson2424
      @pergustavsson2424 10 месяцев назад +3

      For the past 10 years, my daily watch has been the Seiko SNK805. What I like the most about it, apart from the size and legibility, is the position of the crown at 4 o'clock. It is never in the way. Tragically, Seiko has stopped producing the clock, so I will have to find a couple of late production ones still out there somewhere.

    • @Leadlobotamist
      @Leadlobotamist 10 месяцев назад

      I don't remember when I got it but I've been using an SNK805 for years.
      Threw a dark brown leather strap on it and it's a damn nice watch for being "budget"(use to be, they're twice what I paid for now).
      I love simple watches.

    • @joseluismalagagranda4785
      @joseluismalagagranda4785 9 месяцев назад

      Now I am wearing the srpg35, I found it can jump from field to formal casual changing to black leather strap .

  • @ivanmoralesbello1
    @ivanmoralesbello1 11 месяцев назад +10

    Great point of view . Down to earth , intelligent perspective . Very much enjoyed .Thank you .

  • @kofiofosu9051
    @kofiofosu9051 11 месяцев назад +145

    I work in healthcare at a correctional facility. The correctional officers require a watch as part of their uniforms. 19/100 use an apple or android smart watch. 80/100 west G Shocks. The G shock is in my estimation the true, toughest modern day field watch. 1 officer wears an Omega seamaster professional. I’ve started to wear my G shocks there. It’s nice to blend in well.

    • @drkesrf
      @drkesrf 11 месяцев назад +6

      Great testimony. I can understand this.

    • @Overlord277
      @Overlord277 11 месяцев назад +10

      G-Shock is a lot of go-to picks. I was in the Army. I used an Armitron digital. It was more useful due to it's easy to read and use stop watch function.

    • @miguelribeirodesousa9851
      @miguelribeirodesousa9851 11 месяцев назад +2

      On the spot in todays watch world. The question I have is that we sometimes seek some kind of differentiation but at the same time simplicity .

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад +16

      G-shock for the win 😀😀

    • @dimatha7
      @dimatha7 11 месяцев назад +1

      how are you allowed to wear a watch at healthcare?

  • @chrisbeale9022
    @chrisbeale9022 3 месяца назад +3

    I was ten years old when our local jeweller delivered my father’s Rolex 5500 Air King with white Arabic dial for which he paid 55 guineas. That was sixty years ago and dad is long gone, but I wear his Rolex with pride. It’s simple, a field watch by current parlance, but perfect in every way. I guess the measure of a great watch is that it is timeless.

  • @e.jacktaylor4053
    @e.jacktaylor4053 7 месяцев назад +1

    Staight-forward, informative, friendly, cordial... that's what a RUclips presenter should be. And also a tool watch. Wry smile. Thank you very much - excellent!

  • @DeeEx27
    @DeeEx27 11 месяцев назад +3

    Great video and topic. There’s something so refreshing and charming about the utilitarian spirit and unpretentious yet efficacious design of a field watch. I think you’re right in saying that sometimes less is indeed more. Simple uncomplicated three-handers can deliver a lot of enjoyment. I own ta Serica 4512, a modern no non-sense field watch, which is perhaps just a tad more sophisticated than your average hammy. And in fact the Murph 38 was Serica‘s main contender and lost also for a question of budget.
    But when it comes to field watches I have to mention the CWC G10 and W10. Especially their quartz variants deliver great value for watches that have historically been issued to the British army. I‘d love to add a W10 to my collection at some point!

  • @SERRRRRRRR
    @SERRRRRRRR Месяц назад

    Just picked up the Seiko SRPJ83. Cream dial, put it on a simple black leather band. Beautiful, simple field watch. More than I could've wished for, does just what I need and not a thing more. Love watches for their mechanics, and a field watch is just that

  • @maxcontax
    @maxcontax 10 месяцев назад +3

    I have and wear three different Hamilton automatics, one for dress, one sailing (Navy Pioneer), one all the rest of the time, the KhakiField model. They have been very reliable and get noticed, especially the Limited Edition Jazzmaster (2018). As an outdoors person I value the reliability. These replaced two Tissot quartz watches which fogged up because the kid that replaced the battery last time wrecked the gasket, I was out sailing and it just quit. These automatic field watches don’t have the issue of battery failure and humidity leaks. No battery to fail at -30C. Shockproof, easy to read at a glance, second sweep hand, smooth metal bracelet that stays closed. Not fancy, but they work in my real world.

  • @RyanVoight
    @RyanVoight 5 месяцев назад

    This was perfect. And i love that you touched specifically on pilot watches as field watches, and on IWC as being in a weird place with their pilot watches stuck between tool and luxury (which is actually what I like most about them).
    Your detailed analysis on the explorer- which can be applied to lots of models of course- was so refined. You have such a subjective way of seeing normally objective and emotional things with these watches. Just awesome. 👏

  • @Remboken
    @Remboken 10 месяцев назад +5

    I have always loved the Field watches, easy to read.

  • @e_d_v_a_u_s
    @e_d_v_a_u_s 9 месяцев назад +2

    Just found your channel from a post on WatchCrunch and this is the first video I watched from you. Smart, well thought out commentary. Subscribed.

  • @dalesmith7250
    @dalesmith7250 11 месяцев назад +4

    You nailed it. I think you could have even thrown the Longines Spirit into the conversation. Regarding the G-Shock...things with batteries like to act up in very cold weather and very hot weather, so I might argue that a mechanical watch is better suited to temperatures more on the extreme side.

    • @wayneholmes637
      @wayneholmes637 11 месяцев назад +2

      I found my mechanicals were somewhat bothered by the difference between -15°C in the German winter and +35°C during the S.E. Asian hot season. Much more than my gshocks and eco-drives.

  • @RICKYY1100
    @RICKYY1100 4 месяца назад +2

    My favorite tool watch is my 38 Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic. I bought one in 2012 and never wore it and in 2018 my son told me he wanted a new watch and when I asked him what he wanted guess what he said LOL. So I gave it to him, it was still NIB and he has worn it since and loves it. I got the urge for another one a couple of months ago and the price had doubled from 2012. I still think it is worth what I paid for it, it is just a great watch that looks awesome and is accurate.

  • @simonwright6882
    @simonwright6882 11 месяцев назад +18

    If we are going to imagine anyone actually uses each watch for it's original purpose this makes me feel I've saved a bunch of cash by sticking with the kaki feild for my choice of feild watch. I love its simple design.

    • @Unwoken_European
      @Unwoken_European 11 месяцев назад +2

      I have 2 nice dressy divers with 20 ATM. I have only used them as office watches.

  • @TonyTapay
    @TonyTapay 7 месяцев назад +1

    So good to hear someone digging into this topic and articulating so many of my thoughts. Really, it's only out of respect to the heritage that we still view field watches, like the Hamilton, no matter how stripped down, as tools. We simply have cheaper, better technology to do the tasks required; spending $700 on an instrument to tell us the time is a luxury no matter how you look at it. Watches are so fascinating because they're not just about what they do in a mechanical sense, but what they say to the world about the wearer. Values, whether they be utilitarian, nostalgia, stealth wealth, or other subtle and NON-subtle signaling are all at work.

  • @andrewchanis8082
    @andrewchanis8082 9 месяцев назад +4

    I have a Hamilton khaki field mechanical. I got it because it was simple, easy to read and didn't require batteries. When I told my wife that I had to wind it every day she asked, "What's the point?" That was the point.

  • @watchmewithwatches
    @watchmewithwatches 8 месяцев назад +2

    CWC G10. Field watch perfection to me. I can't get over how pure it feels.

  • @Anaesdoc
    @Anaesdoc 11 месяцев назад +4

    Extremely well thought through and articulate video. A real discovery, reminds me a bit of Watchfinder some years ago.

  • @ancmusic2562
    @ancmusic2562 Месяц назад +2

    Love my Hamilton Khaki, but I wear a titanium Bertucci A-11t Americana far, far more often outdoors. It’s been in the ocean a bazillion times, too. It just works

  • @jag1099
    @jag1099 11 месяцев назад +66

    My newest watch - The Tudor Ranger. Love it.

    • @mrautomatech2329
      @mrautomatech2329 11 месяцев назад +2

      Yeah tried one on at my local shop, and it’s way nicer than I thought. Awesome watch

    • @DocMulholland
      @DocMulholland 11 месяцев назад +5

      I've been owning a Tudor Ranger for almost one year now. It's the best daily I ever had. The watch is absolutely perfect for what it is, nothing has to be changed. In its own mystical way, it is simply gorgeous ❤

    • @DeepFriedDoom
      @DeepFriedDoom 11 месяцев назад +5

      Love the butt plug hour hand. Perfect for exploring new ground and charting unseen depths.

    • @djrudog1158
      @djrudog1158 10 месяцев назад +1

      Not tool watch or field watch..

    • @richardstiles6370
      @richardstiles6370 10 месяцев назад +1

      I'm hoping to purchase one in near future 👍

  • @richardmonsell3899
    @richardmonsell3899 11 месяцев назад +1

    I enjoyed your presentation very much. Just wanted to throw in that I ordered my first field watch this February. I was persuaded by the Mad Hacker to support his launch of his very own Field Watch. Listen to his sales / specifications speech and you may understand why I was hooked. Plus it’s wind up. Cheers R

  • @Smithcraft1
    @Smithcraft1 2 месяца назад +6

    And here I am with my Timex Expedition...

  • @Deconstructeur
    @Deconstructeur 11 месяцев назад +2

    After the dive watch, I"d say the field watch is the most popular style out there. That's why there are tons of affordable options in addition to the models you show in your video. One of the better-known budget field watch it the Timex Expedition. They made a gazillion of them in different styles and one can see them quite often on the wrist of any given stranger on the street.

  • @Hard_7_Iron
    @Hard_7_Iron 11 месяцев назад +3

    One of the things I always loved about Steinhart Watches was the “field watch” vibe. I own the GMT which I’m sure was created for people who cant or wont afford a Rolex Explorer II. It is my weekend watch! My beater. The one I never worry about. All painted markers. 300M of water resistance. Completely brushed. All for less than $600 USD. I know a lot of people hate the brand because they knockoff other designs. But I love the only Steinhart I own…because its truly go anywhere do anything for the weekend beater. And with that said…it’s the weekend. See ya.

    • @WestCoastAce27
      @WestCoastAce27 11 месяцев назад

      I have their take on the original Exp II too - and love it. If Rolex would reissue it and sell it to us mortals, I’d buy theirs and give the Steinhart to a young personas his gateway watch (still on the list for the 226570 polar - the downside of living in a metropolis).

  • @motocommando2477
    @motocommando2477 7 месяцев назад

    This has got to be the best explanation for what a watch is all about, especially a field watch. It's a tool, pure and simple. I love my field watches. None are super expensive, but incredibly useful for what they do, simply telling the time. Excellent video and presentation.

  • @jefflogsdon3328
    @jefflogsdon3328 10 месяцев назад +4

    My field watch is a Vaer. I love it.

    • @Daniel-of6rw
      @Daniel-of6rw 10 месяцев назад +1

      Yes! Their watches are great.

    • @elosacle
      @elosacle 4 месяца назад

      I am still obsessed with my Vaer A5 automatic, and am very glad I went for the steel bracelet. Got as a christmas gift for myself last year and still wear it every day.

  • @kvato3069
    @kvato3069 22 дня назад

    I’ve got the Seiko GMT Field Watch that came out last year. It’s amazing. The design is almost perfect at 39.4 mm case, dial has beautiful simple look with some pops of orange. The silver bezel makes the watch look slightly smaller than almost 40mm. The bracelet brings some flash to the look with the 5 row links and good polish. Keeps great time and has just enough complications/features to occupy boredom.

  • @vanditpandya2982
    @vanditpandya2982 10 месяцев назад +7

    Seamaster Railmaster ✅

  • @wowlsj
    @wowlsj 11 месяцев назад +2

    My one and only "Field Watch" is the, as you noted in the video, the disqualified "Murph 38". I love it because it's "cleaner" than the base Khaki, but because of the beautiful brushed case, I won't let it become a beater - I love the clean brushing - which defeats the whole purpose! 😂

  • @DogStar84
    @DogStar84 11 месяцев назад +5

    Mike just talked me into wanting a field watch

  • @catsteeth
    @catsteeth 11 месяцев назад +1

    Great video again from my #1 YT person. Delightfully refreshing to hear clear and structured thought 👍
    I loved my Hamilton Khaki. I thought I was getting a 2824, but instead had the very first Powermatic out. Terribly unstable timekeeping. Ruined a great watch.
    I had to chuckle that you came down for the Tudor in the end. I picked up my 224270 up yesterday! After "only" a six month wait. So cheers 🤦

  • @TomJones-tx7pb
    @TomJones-tx7pb 11 месяцев назад +3

    Every day I throw my polished titanium GS on my wrist and forget about it (whatever I am doing) until I need to know the time.
    It still looks the same as the day I bought it.
    No-one notices it because at a distance it looks like an everyday steel watch from the 70s.
    I never worry about its power level - it has never stopped.
    That is my idea of a tool watch.

  • @roamy3605
    @roamy3605 11 месяцев назад +2

    When I finally set out to buy a field (tool) watch my first look was to the Rolex Explorer (39mm). I liked the heritage, reputation, and look. But in reality I liked the look of the Explorer 1016 much better. To me it had "the look". But the 1016's are getting pretty old and very expensive for a decent one. Fast forward a couple years and the newest Tudor Ranger arrives on scene. It's well built, has a modern/rugged movement, a great size for my 7 1/2" wrist, and had that Explorer 1016 look. I don't think I could be any happier about this purchase. I use it golfing, hiking, bike riding, and all sorts of work inside and outside my house. It did take me awhile to fully appreciate this Tudor and now I have a hard time giving my other watches time on my wrist.

  • @moonbaby6134
    @moonbaby6134 8 месяцев назад +5

    got a citizen ‘Ray Mears’ titanium field watch. It’s fantastic. 300m, solid titanium block, solar powered eco drive, Kevlar strap. All for £300. Love it.

  • @jb-hw9if
    @jb-hw9if 11 месяцев назад +2

    Great video. You've reached into my thoughts and perfectly described my core watch strategy. Couldn't agree more with you.

  • @WaterJake
    @WaterJake 11 месяцев назад +5

    Very nice video, as always, but I do have a bone to pick with it. You can't really talk about field watches loke Hamilton without acknowledging the many Seikos and Citizens. The Alpinist immediately comes to mind, but Seiko has been making field watches of different kinds all throughout its history. The Seiko 5 Sports SRPs, SARGs, HAQ Brightz, there are and have been tons of them. These have served as reliable workhorse beaters for many, many watch wearers through the years.

  • @richardharker2775
    @richardharker2775 7 месяцев назад +2

    Many, many watches perform perfectly for their design principle. Keeping time. I bought a simple Citizen Eco Drive when I first knew about them more than 20 years ago and it still works perfectly. I've change the bands twice. It is like the perfect marriage and I have no reason to change.

  • @DavidFisher-fq2wh
    @DavidFisher-fq2wh 10 месяцев назад +6

    Nothing beats my $50 Timex Expedition. They “take a licking and keep on ticking” 😬

    • @dmacarthur5356
      @dmacarthur5356 10 месяцев назад +4

      Seems there is no love for the Timex Expedition here lol. I loved mine and it took a beating but never failed and kept great time.

    • @Mike1614YT
      @Mike1614YT 4 месяца назад

      @@dmacarthur5356 snobs

  • @RCSFragrance
    @RCSFragrance 9 месяцев назад +1

    First time to this channel and I learned more about watches in this video than any other video I have watched so far.

  • @the_shadow_realm5110
    @the_shadow_realm5110 11 месяцев назад +3

    Ironically, if I was to climb Everest and had to take an automatic watch (and not a Garmin/G-Shock), I’d want to take my Submariner Date.
    The diving bezel would be useful to time ascent/descent times, rest breaks, and it’s tough as nails.
    The Submariner to me is a true Explorer’s watch. A true Aqua-Terra, surf and turf explorer’s watch.

  • @DocMulholland
    @DocMulholland 11 месяцев назад +4

    I've been owning a Tudor Ranger for almost one year now. It's the best daily I ever had. The watch is absolutely perfect for what it is, nothing has to be changed. In its own mystical way, it is simply gorgeous ❤

  • @michaelpeters5696
    @michaelpeters5696 10 месяцев назад +1

    After a lifetime of disposable timex's(and a really nice Seiko) my tool watch for the last 3 deployments was a GMT II- worked great, did everything I needed and took a lot of punishment-so, in my eyes, the best field watch I've owned.

  • @philanthropenos1074
    @philanthropenos1074 11 месяцев назад +7

    Per my personal experience, there is no such thing as a "luxury hammer". It is a toll. If well built, you use it "in the field' It can never be a "show off" item. Same goes with watches. Ironman's or G-Shock's are the field watches. Having said that I found out that a whole Halo team was using Rolex Submariners (painted in black) since there are resistant to electro-magnetic explosions. Still, I don't think there is any real field watch in this video ( but only retro field style watches). They are like our SUVs; lost their connection with the off-road, instead became glorified SWs.

  • @swentworth
    @swentworth 9 месяцев назад

    I've never heard such watch knowledge in my life. This is an intense video. I'm learning a lot. I recently purchased a Marathon JDD. I love the look, but bought it more as a "bug out" watch. An automatic watch that seems to be built like a tank. I'm not a "watch guy" though, so I'm definitely new at this. can't do the G-Shock as they're not automatic and their solar options still require a battery to charge. Any thoughts on an off-grid option that will go forever and can take a beating?

  • @StandAloneState
    @StandAloneState 11 месяцев назад +4

    The best tool/field watch would be defined by the words “practical”, “durable”, “versatile”and “reliable”.
    Having at least 100M water resistance, a screw down crown, automatic and hand winding (but the ultimate would be solar quartz), excellent lume and low light legibility, good color contrasts between the hands and the indices/dial, and having something like hardened steel is a nice touch.
    And often overlooked, the ability to adjust the strap and easily take it on and swap out with other straps is a huge plus.

  • @savageinstitute9569
    @savageinstitute9569 4 месяца назад +2

    I use the Citizen Ecodrive Garrison as a field watch. (Its a pilot watch) no battery no problems. That and another one I got as gifts and have been through rugged treatment and look and function great. Low end goodness!!

  • @borassictime918
    @borassictime918 11 месяцев назад +6

    Unpretentious! Yes, sir. The Formex Field counts as its own interpretation of the field watch, I think.
    And the nearest the Explorer ever got to the summit of Everest was the AD’s window in Kathmandu…😚

  • @michaelbrooks1061
    @michaelbrooks1061 11 месяцев назад +1

    Nice take on the tool watch world. As an owner of a 5226g I appreciate the brand's option of a tool like watch. I think Patek successfully bridged that tool luxury divide. And that dial.....

  • @MountainRancher
    @MountainRancher 11 месяцев назад +5

    I have the Hamilton Khaki 42 with green nato strap. Love it!

  • @demej00
    @demej00 11 месяцев назад

    I love this ad about Oris rebuilding a watch. Beautiful. I watch it almost every time. Beautiful music too.

  • @threethrushes
    @threethrushes 11 месяцев назад +3

    Nomenclature is all very interesting, but what's the purpose of a field watch - who uses the watch, and why?
    When I served in the 90s, I wore a Casio. If I had to wear a watch today in the field (camping, yomping) it would be a Marathon GSAR - visibility at night is GOAT. No other watch I own can match it, even watches x3 the price.

    • @dannysimenauer5745
      @dannysimenauer5745 11 месяцев назад

      3 Thrushes, That is a nice feature when you are camping out in nature. Does the Marathon GSAR last most of the night?

    • @petrokersta5293
      @petrokersta5293 11 месяцев назад +3

      ⁠Marathon GSAR uses tritium tubes so it just glows. It doesn’t require light to be charged like lune. It’ll glow for about 25years. Then you’d be left with 1/4 of tritium. So it would need to go back to Marathon for new tubes.

  • @fredericperrin3279
    @fredericperrin3279 11 месяцев назад +2

    Amazing how you can talk for a quarter of an hour about this topic, with excellent and well thought through arguments. Well, my personal best field watch is a Norqain Neverest (Zermatt special edition). OK, by your definitions it is not a field watch as it has a rotating bezel and a "glacier" looking dial, but it certainly looks, feels and wears like a true field watch.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад

      Thanks - I just ignore my family and nerd on watches in stead 😂😂
      As for Norqain, I have to dive into them at some point. I'm seeing more and more of them and have stopped at the counter often, but never taken one out of the case... On the to do 😃

    • @fredericperrin3279
      @fredericperrin3279 11 месяцев назад

      @@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch Great, thanks for the reply. I would love to have your enlighted view of the Norquain brand.

  • @georgemanakanatas1241
    @georgemanakanatas1241 11 месяцев назад +21

    People for some reason are not comfortable admitting that they are wearing jewelry and are trying to pass off their often multi thousand $ purchase as a tool. Other than personal preference in terms of style calling anything in this price range a tool with a straight face is just silly

    • @INSANEFAME
      @INSANEFAME 11 месяцев назад +4

      The purpose of jewelry is to sparkle and attract attention. Unlike jewelry, a tool watch is meant to endure. Very different concepts.

    • @emreisiklar
      @emreisiklar 11 месяцев назад

      Wearing a Rolex explorer instead of a 50$ gschok im the “ field “ is wearing jewellery 😊 there is a better cheaper tool if you are interested in the tool part

    • @INSANEFAME
      @INSANEFAME 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@emreisiklar It depends. An explorer will outlast you. A gshock won't even outlast its own battery 😊

    • @Sid00077
      @Sid00077 11 месяцев назад +2

      Most folks I know are fully aware that a watch is a functional piece of jewelry. Especially anything over $100.

    • @Sid00077
      @Sid00077 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​​@@INSANEFAMETrue, but I can get a G shock for just $100, and can abuse it, and I mean put it through hell, till its battery dies. The same cannot be said for an explorer.

  • @WatchandSon
    @WatchandSon 10 месяцев назад +2

    Really very, very good. Great debate. I love Field Watches because of their simplicity and durability. I'll have my burger from the van outside the nightclub as you say.

  • @granthidor
    @granthidor 11 месяцев назад +3

    timex expedition scout

  • @JBass33
    @JBass33 10 месяцев назад +1

    New subscriber here. This video is only 9 days old and already has nearly 500 replies. It is rare to find such an articulate and thoughtful discussion. My taste in field/tool/pilot watches are at a lower level than even the Hamilton. They are made by Casio, Orient and Seiko. Except for my Bulova military model with its 262khz movement, I can lose, damage, or break any of them without being heartbroken.

  • @markhamjeff9104
    @markhamjeff9104 11 месяцев назад +3

    My go to field watch is the Tudor BB36 gloss black dial. It’s simple, sporty, and the perfect size.

  • @Watchamacallit
    @Watchamacallit 19 дней назад +2

    You missed the best, and possibly only, example of an upgraded field watch that still retains it's tool identity: the Omega Railmaster. All brushed stainless; 150 meters; no applied markers; 3,6,9,12; good lume; high legibility; anti-magnetic; closed back; in-house automatic chronometer movement. About $3K gray market or excellent used.

  • @jason41a
    @jason41a 11 месяцев назад +13

    the g-shock is the modern day field watch lol
    the g-shock is the modern day dive watch
    the g-shock is the modern day sport watch.
    the g-shock is the past day smart watch.
    basically the g-shock is for everything, but it's bleedingly ugly IMO.

  • @HopeGamerBrand
    @HopeGamerBrand 7 месяцев назад

    This was one of the coolest videos I have ever seen about the topic of tool watches and luxury.

  • @tomdoe5698
    @tomdoe5698 10 месяцев назад +1

    your intro was describing invicta. " only chronograph with a meteorite face" shopNBC goid days

  • @Claus-L.Mueller
    @Claus-L.Mueller 11 месяцев назад +1

    Hi!
    I would toss my Omega Railmaster with its charcoal dial in the ring. IMHO the Railmaster is an understated luxury tool watch. The 3, 6, 9 and 12 non applied numerals and the cross hair give it its field watch vibes. The case and bracelet is all brushed and the crown has got a decent size.
    Best wishes,
    Claus

  • @chriskola3822
    @chriskola3822 3 месяца назад +1

    My "field watch" is a Seiko Alpinist on a black NATO strap. Certainly more on the smart-casual or dressy end of the spectrum but it is still a very comfortable daily wearer. Date function, gold numerals and markers, polished bezel with clear caseback. Not strictly "field watch". When I'm actually doing the hard and dirty work I'll wear a G-Shock.
    I grew up in a time before smart phones and apple watches where people actually still wore wrist watches to tell the time. Maybe it is nostalgia but I still like the concept.

  • @JimWestrich
    @JimWestrich 11 месяцев назад +2

    Thanks for the vid. Already anticipated it since I woke up today. Perhaps the sushi comparison might have fit better, given the idea is to focus on the taste of the single most important ingredient (the fish in most cases), as opposed to other cuisine like French, Italian or even burger, where the combination, despite being simple, is key. And yes, the Hamilton Khaki is the field watch

  • @gremlin76
    @gremlin76 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you ❤. Not only have you treated me with another great video but you’ve also covered my absolutely favourite watch style. I like sports/divers watches (who doesn’t), I appreciate nice chronographs, but eventually my heart always goes to the simplest watches of all - field, no date, brushed.
    I love mechanical watches but I don’t want to loose on accuracy. That immediately sends me up the market.
    Somehow I didn’t connect with Sinn, my first proper field watch was Longines Spirit Titanium. Near perfect - light, accurate, legible, but - just as your theory says - it was too much. Too much gilt, too much detail on the dial. Great watch, but 6 months later I had to find it a new home.
    Months or research and trying different models at ADs allowed me to narrow the list down to two pieces- Tudor Ranger and Omega Railmaster. I love them both, both have what I’m looking for in an everyday watch. Keeping in mind my recent failure with Longines I decided to go with simplicity and buy a Ranger. Omega RM still catches my eye whenever I see it, but after nearly 7 months with Tudor I feel I’ve made a right choice. Love this little watch to death.
    Also, to your point about dress and field watches being close to each other - fully agree. Looking for a more formal watch I went with Omega Seamaster 1948 70th Anniversary Limited Edition. “Town, sea and country”. Almost field, but still very much a dress watch.
    Love this topic, thanks for sharing. Cheers.🍻

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  11 месяцев назад +1

      Glad to hear that this vid hit a little closer to your heart. As for your final choice: Spot on 👍👍😀😀

  • @luke211286
    @luke211286 5 месяцев назад +2

    I always admire your insights about watches. But I have learned something new about you by watching this video: by mentioning 'guanciale' you sure have good tastes for an awesome carbonara.

  • @burkhardlange9280
    @burkhardlange9280 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you for this great video, Mike! It reminded me why I love my unpretentious Sinn 856 so much! Please keep up your excellent content!

  • @YungStinkyWinky
    @YungStinkyWinky День назад

    Seiko SPRG35 is a personal favourite. Surprising quality and elegance for such a cheap watch. A good field watch for people just getting into watches or not seeing the need to spend thousands on a watch.