Swedish å & ö, examples of phonetic reduction.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 янв 2025

Комментарии • 27

  • @staffanlinnaeus1460
    @staffanlinnaeus1460 Месяц назад +12

    Fun fact: French "eau" is pronounced just like Swedish "å" and comes from the same indo-european root. (I'm no expert, but this is quite obvious.)

    • @EVO6-
      @EVO6- Месяц назад +1

      Not really pronounced the same

    • @gts1300
      @gts1300 Месяц назад +1

      Not exactly the same but nice coincidence nonetheless

  • @weepingscorpion8739
    @weepingscorpion8739 Месяц назад +17

    Modern Icelandic ey merges with ei, so ey is pronounced /ei/ (the e might be more open). Interestingly in Faroese, ON ey becomes modern Faroese oy so it is pronounced /ɔi:/ but this word also underwent "skerping" or a second Holtzmann's Law, so the word is oyggj /ɔtʃ:/. The form oy is still found in island names and is often reduced to a simple [i~ɪ~e].

    • @LFSDK
      @LFSDK Месяц назад +2

      in the north, they also merge ON ei and ey, but probably at a later date, hehe

    • @weepingscorpion8739
      @weepingscorpion8739 Месяц назад +1

      @@LFSDK Yup, I speak a northern dialect as my native one. But when discussing Faroese in general, I go for a more neutral Svabo-esque mixture.

    • @LFSDK
      @LFSDK Месяц назад

      @@weepingscorpion8739 tó ikki við hansara rættstaving

  • @griffinbeaumont7049
    @griffinbeaumont7049 23 дня назад +2

    I believe the outcome in Dutch is "aa," but this word has almost completely fallen out of use as far as I know. Of course, like in other countries, it does surface in place names and the names of streams. There is a place relatively nearby where I live called "Ter Aar" with related "Aardam." When I first heard it, I thought it might indeed be the genitive of Aa, especially in "Aardam," that would be 'dam of Aa.' However, the name of the stream does seem to be "Aar" wherever it appears. Frustratingly, I can't find a good source on the history of the name, so it's just been lingering unresolved in the back of my mind :(

  • @jean-claudewallard9309
    @jean-claudewallard9309 Месяц назад +1

    It is strange that the prononciation in early old norse is the same as the word eau in French today. But where is the connection to wasser in Germany and water in English?

    • @jean-claudewallard9309
      @jean-claudewallard9309 Месяц назад

      German not Germany.

    • @tidsdjupet-mr5ud
      @tidsdjupet-mr5ud  Месяц назад +5

      That is another word, "vatn"

    • @jean-claudewallard9309
      @jean-claudewallard9309 Месяц назад

      @@tidsdjupet-mr5ud Another word for water? So there were two words for it??

    • @jean-claudewallard9309
      @jean-claudewallard9309 Месяц назад

      Excuse my confusion. Aqua in latin is water. I thought we were on words meaning water. But it was all about islands, right?

    • @grimmcreole44
      @grimmcreole44 Месяц назад +3

      Ö means Island, å means river; both share an etymological root with aqua in proto indo-european "hekweh". Vatten, wasser & water also share an etymological root in PIE "wodr".

  • @ShoutsWillEcho1
    @ShoutsWillEcho1 Месяц назад

    Dayums thats deep

  • @LFSDK
    @LFSDK Месяц назад

    a æ u' å æ ø u' i æ å

    • @evatzug
      @evatzug Месяц назад

      this is probably a valid sentence in some norwegian dialect

    • @themarxologist
      @themarxologist Месяц назад +4

      @@evatzug It's a sentence in the danish dialect of southern jutland. It means something like "I am out on the island in the river"

  • @gustafduell4948
    @gustafduell4948 Месяц назад

    Det känns som att något är diskutabelt i ljudteorierna när alla rekonstruerade orden uttalas som med tandläkarkuddar i kinderna men alla besläktade språk inte uttalar det så.
    Ämne för en film? 🙂

    • @tidsdjupet-mr5ud
      @tidsdjupet-mr5ud  Месяц назад +2

      Vad menar du egentligen?
      Är det -w- du syftar på?

    • @gustafduell4948
      @gustafduell4948 Месяц назад

      @tidsdjupet-mr5ud vet inte. (jag har knappt studerat ljudändringar alls utan tycker din kanal är intressant). Men de rekonstruerade orden låter så ovanliga jämfört med orden i andra europeiska språk, inbillar jag mig. Som om du håller ut kinderna när du uttalar de orden, eller har tandläkarkuddar där. Hur säker är man på uttalet av rekonstruktionerna? Måste kolla en gång till.

    • @tidsdjupet-mr5ud
      @tidsdjupet-mr5ud  Месяц назад +5

      @@gustafduell4948 I det första exemplet är det precis samma ord som "acqua" i dagens italenska, bara med lång ändelsevokal.

    • @gustafduell4948
      @gustafduell4948 Месяц назад

      Nu har jag kollat på den många gånger... det är nog uttalshastigheten jag funderar över. Spelar du filmen 1.25 eller 1.5 gånger snabbare låter de gamla orden mer som vardagsanvända ord. I alla fall i mina öron. Spännande.
      (Ibland känns det som man pratar fortare och fortare. Inspelningar på oss barn och pappa på 70 talet låter nästan som ett annat språk jämfört med hur det pratas nu.)

    • @rudde7918
      @rudde7918 Месяц назад

      ​@@gustafduell4948jag ger svar på engelska: we can be pretty certain of the sounds of the reconstructions. One piece of evidence are loanwords in different languages, that were borrowed when the vowels still hadn't changed. For Germanic languages, there exist many Germanic loanwords in Finnish, that have fossilized the state of the Germanic words as they were historically.

  • @aquenwisey
    @aquenwisey Месяц назад

    GODLIKE VIDEO
    AGELESS TONGUES