I already think like this. People like to call it overthinking, which is true, but I've learned to use it to my advantage. I combine it with my creativity and logic, resulting in creative solutions. You just gave me a boost of confidence, thank you.
@@MuhammadAzamuddin depends on weather you look at it as a blessing or a curse, as it can be both. I'd rather take it and utilize it. Train an "over thinking" mind to connect the right dots and create a solution.
While we do the design thinking, the mental have to netral so if overthinking comes your mental will not allow you to have negative. The mental will have to positive and not to be affected by overthinking
0:00 - Intro 0:13 - What is Design Thinking? 0:54 - Problem Solving and Design Thinking 1:25 - What problems can Design Thinking solve? 1:50 - How does it work? The problem tree graphic. 2:33 - An Example - The Washington Monument 4:18 - My Experience with Design Thinking 6:03 - What did I learn? 6:38 - What did I learn? #2 6:50 - What did I learn? #3 7:00 - Download the Design Tree 7:09 - Outro Timestamps by Digimancer
There are many tools under the Design Thinking framework/mindset/way of doing, knowing when and where to apply the tools is the secret sauce. Great video!
They teach this in design school. Whole class had a workshop fr an industry company where we each tried to mock design a hotel for specific target audience. Yellow post-its for potential issues, orange for cause of issue, pink for the solution. There's a framework I forgot. We pair it w user journey map to design custom tailored experiences for mock customers.
Love the video! Basically, it is to follow the causal chain but backwards. I love this videos, but in fact, this is a very ancient way of investigating problems, typical of ancient philosophy (thousands of years). The 2 main aspects are: 1. Investigate the causal chain (of the problem) as deeply as possible (to come up with a possible solution to the first cause). 2. The 3 questions of Socrates for investigation, with a slight modification in the first 2, and a change in the third. Yes indeed, it is one of the eternal most effective way of thinking!
Always good to know how to move from undesirable situation to a desirable one! Design thinking can obviously solve any problem. The Washington monument example was amazing.✌️
Design thinking puts *people first* 🙋🏽 It provides a repeatable process that leads to successful solutions. ⚙💡 *_Start by asking questions_* ❓Do we know this is true? ❓Who else believes it's true? ❓Who makes the final decision? Reveal any biases that could get in the way of a solution. 🔎 Design thinking is a repeatable process with universal language. 🔄 Design thinking is about asking questions to get to the root causes. 🌳
Great video. I have been using similar process subconsciously. This video helped me to understand that there should be some sort of processes/framework in place so that both the client and we can conclude a decision. Looking forward to more videos. Thanks to TheFutur !
Futur I thanked you on another video. RUclips switches the video in a hot second. they no longer give you even a chance tp comment, if you don't stop the video completely it will go to another video. I usually get to cancel in time, but trying to do a lot of stuff in just a few milliseconds, well, it didn't work this time. I got switch and made a comment before I knew I wasn't even here. Our digital world at work.
When everyone in a group participates, the conclusion, right or wrong, will be defended by the group. Groups agree. Groups do not always avoid new ways of thinking, but they avoid lack of progress in thinking. Progress is measured with the number of agreements made by the group per hour. If the group is unable to agree on a sticky note after 20 minutes of time invested, everyone gets tense and looks for something else they CAN agree on. New way discussions can be uncomfortable and inconclusive for too long for the group to accept. The design thinking facilitator, like a psychiatrist or lawyer, can lead the witness or "uncover" subconscious desires that were not there or not important.
Hey The Futur/Eric, Great video! Are you able to share the solution provided in the mentioned case study at 4:19? It would be helpful for my understanding as I continue to grow. Thanks!
Great video as always. I am curious regarding the monument. Did they leave the lights of permanently or did they come up with a solution for that also. Using different type of lights?
Hi there, according to the National Park Service the lights are on a timer and vary based on seasonality. But NewsNation’s Washington bureau confirmed the White House lights go out around 11 p.m. ET nightly, and it is not unusual.
I agree with the idea, but the presenter has a superficial understanding and feels like he is narrating someone else script. Design to solve, not design to root cause, he was addressing more about root cause analysis than design thinking. Would like more justice done for this ideology.
I like the term “design thinking” a lot, just sounds good. But when I hear how the presenter described how the bird poop resolved… I thought “isn’t that just THINKING? “ can someone help me what’s the difference????? I’m genuinely interested. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Design Thinking encourages you to really understand the root cause of the problem first before even thinking about how to fix it. While 'just thinking' on the other hand let you jump into solution right away, like if they were to stopped at the cleaning solution being the problem and then spend money and resources fixing that. It might work but you'll end up spending a lot of time and money fixing it if you didn't understand the root cause. Like what if you'd have to replace all the flooring to different materials because you found out that changing the cleaning solutions didn't help?? Had you started using Design Thinking in the first place, all you really needed to fix was turn off the light.
Design Thinking is thinking. But more importantly, it is a framework, and it is much easier to facilitate a team when everyone has guiderails. The problem, in my experience, is that other traditional problem solving frameworks limit innovation where Design Thinking is a framework that keeps that as a priority.
He used a cool example of design thinking that general people can understand. While you can use design thinking framework to solve any kind of problem, I don't think that example really let the beauty of design thinking shine as bright as it could. I think of design thinking as a philosophy, rooted in empathy. Empathy is the ability to see/understand things from the perspective of another person. Design Thinking shines the brightest when the problem you're solving involve people. Design Thinking takes you through a journey of understanding who's really experiencing the problem and all the nuances specific to the people experiencing that problem. The reason why I love design thinking so much is because it helps you solves real problems not the made up ones in your head.
@@chiefeeth You explained that thoroughly and beautifully. Anyone who still insists what you described is "JuSt ThiNkinG" and asks YOU to explain again "WhAt MakEs It DeSiGn?" is demonstrating THEY simply aren't capable of understanding it or doing it.🤷🏼♀️
Seems like some people get annoyed by this trend because they don't like somebody else "taking credit" for a methodology they and lots of other people have essentially already been using. Isn't that kind of like getting mad at somebody else's guitar teacher because you already know how to play guitar?
Nada nuevo, esto es marketing caro para enganchar a diseñadores novatos. El diseño implica el pensamiento desde toda la vida, y no hace falta que se llame Design Thinking. “Las personas primero”… gran descubrimiento… Quizás y sólo quizás eso ya lo había puesto en papel la Bauhaus hace algo más de un siglo atrás… Por otro lado, no pueden utilizarse las mismas fórmulas para cualquier proyecto, no es lo mismo diseñar un folleto para la hamburguesería del barrio que diseñar un logo para una aerolínea internacional. Y no es lo mismo tener toda una infraestructura como se muestra en el video que tener una tablet como toda herramienta. En fin, diseñador novato, si realmente quieres crecer y formarte y tener éxito en tu carrera, estudia de los grandes diseñadores (hago incapié en la Bauhaus). Este Eric tiene un buen speaching y una billetera gorda, me hace acordar a las publicidades de Herbalife…
Both of the examples you gave were not solutions!! What am I missing? You can't keep the lights off the Washington Monument at night. That's not a viable solution since people want to see it at night! And you never explained what the solution was to the growing company that thought they needed better software. You just asked a bunch of questions.
I already think like this. People like to call it overthinking, which is true, but I've learned to use it to my advantage. I combine it with my creativity and logic, resulting in creative solutions. You just gave me a boost of confidence, thank you.
Same I've been thinking like this for a while, he just gave it a fancy name and plans on marketing it to make money
@@royal7979 I kinda like the idea of taking the negative reaction to "overthinking" and instead being like "nah, I'm design thinking" ;)
I don't think overthinking and design thinking is the same way
@@MuhammadAzamuddin depends on weather you look at it as a blessing or a curse, as it can be both. I'd rather take it and utilize it. Train an "over thinking" mind to connect the right dots and create a solution.
While we do the design thinking, the mental have to netral so if overthinking comes your mental will not allow you to have negative. The mental will have to positive and not to be affected by overthinking
0:00 - Intro
0:13 - What is Design Thinking?
0:54 - Problem Solving and Design Thinking
1:25 - What problems can Design Thinking solve?
1:50 - How does it work? The problem tree graphic.
2:33 - An Example - The Washington Monument
4:18 - My Experience with Design Thinking
6:03 - What did I learn?
6:38 - What did I learn? #2
6:50 - What did I learn? #3
7:00 - Download the Design Tree
7:09 - Outro
Timestamps by Digimancer
This is super cool and helpful
thank you
Thank you! We'll add it to the description
Popsi og krille
There are many tools under the Design Thinking framework/mindset/way of doing, knowing when and where to apply the tools is the secret sauce. Great video!
They teach this in design school. Whole class had a workshop fr an industry company where we each tried to mock design a hotel for specific target audience. Yellow post-its for potential issues, orange for cause of issue, pink for the solution. There's a framework I forgot. We pair it w user journey map to design custom tailored experiences for mock customers.
I love this!! Thank you so much for this. Bless you!! Bless each and every one watching this.
Thanks Maria.
Love the video!
Basically, it is to follow the causal chain but backwards. I love this videos, but in fact, this is a very ancient way of investigating problems, typical of ancient philosophy (thousands of years).
The 2 main aspects are:
1. Investigate the causal chain (of the problem) as deeply as possible (to come up with a possible solution to the first cause).
2. The 3 questions of Socrates for investigation, with a slight modification in the first 2, and a change in the third.
Yes indeed, it is one of the eternal most effective way of thinking!
Always good to know how to move from undesirable situation to a desirable one! Design thinking can obviously solve any problem. The Washington monument example was amazing.✌️
Design thinking puts *people first* 🙋🏽
It provides a repeatable process that leads to successful solutions. ⚙💡
*_Start by asking questions_*
❓Do we know this is true?
❓Who else believes it's true?
❓Who makes the final decision?
Reveal any biases that could get in the way of a solution. 🔎
Design thinking is a repeatable process with universal language. 🔄
Design thinking is about asking questions to get to the root causes. 🌳
Functional & attractive content...tyty 👍🤩 Supports my Design journey !!
Wow😍Sir u r doing great job ,i never thought a problem can be solved this way....(From India)
My guy Eric dropping knowledge! Great seeing you on The Futur, quality video.
Great video. I have been using similar process subconsciously. This video helped me to understand that there should be some sort of processes/framework in place so that both the client and we can conclude a decision. Looking forward to more videos. Thanks to TheFutur !
Futur I thanked you on another video. RUclips switches the video in a hot second. they no longer give you even a chance tp comment, if you don't stop the video completely it will go to another video. I usually get to cancel in time, but trying to do a lot of stuff in just a few milliseconds, well, it didn't work this time. I got switch and made a comment before I knew I wasn't even here. Our digital world at work.
2:35 - 4:10 was a splendid example!
Love this! So glad to see Eric on Futur!
Hey Eric! You have a fan in me. Awesome breakdown and analysis man!
Nice breakdown here, Eric. Love this!
I loved it. Thanks Futur.
Remarkable way of explaining the design thinking process!!! Thank you for this!
Futur and your team always bringing the insights and philosophy to entrepreneurship. Good stuff!
Thank you 💕 so much for such an amazing video.
This is really an amazing video , This video indirectly helps us see our own root problems and solves it using design thinking😍
Totally loved this.
Really thorough explanation, thanks!
thanks for the video
Great video, very informative.
The 5 Whys as outlined by Toyota. I also hate spiders! :)
Brilliant
Awesome share. Thank you guy's 💪
Wonderful video
Simply excellent.
short but good 👌
Remarkable way of explaining what is design thinking.
Thank you so much
IDEO has been talking about this for a while. Good reminder though
When everyone in a group participates, the conclusion, right or wrong, will be defended by the group. Groups agree.
Groups do not always avoid new ways of thinking, but they avoid lack of progress in thinking. Progress is measured with the number of agreements made by the group per hour. If the group is unable to agree on a sticky note after 20 minutes of time invested, everyone gets tense and looks for something else they CAN agree on. New way discussions can be uncomfortable and inconclusive for too long for the group to accept.
The design thinking facilitator, like a psychiatrist or lawyer, can lead the witness or "uncover" subconscious desires that were not there or not important.
amazing!
Awesome
What’s the name of the guy speaking. I may have missed it in the caption
This is like cool video, i am eager to use this
This is gr8 philosophy
Also known as the 5 why's approach.
Hey The Futur/Eric,
Great video! Are you able to share the solution provided in the mentioned case study at 4:19? It would be helpful for my understanding as I continue to grow.
Thanks!
tq
Great video as always. I am curious regarding the monument. Did they leave the lights of permanently or did they come up with a solution for that also. Using different type of lights?
Hi there, according to the National Park Service the lights are on a timer and vary based on seasonality. But NewsNation’s Washington bureau confirmed the White House lights go out around 11 p.m. ET nightly, and it is not unusual.
I agree with the idea, but the presenter has a superficial understanding and feels like he is narrating someone else script. Design to solve, not design to root cause, he was addressing more about root cause analysis than design thinking. Would like more justice done for this ideology.
He’s giving a good practical example of how to begin using design thinking. You can’t design solutions before you identify and analyse the challenge.
I like the term “design thinking” a lot, just sounds good. But when I hear how the presenter described how the bird poop resolved… I thought “isn’t that just THINKING? “ can someone help me what’s the difference????? I’m genuinely interested. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Design Thinking encourages you to really understand the root cause of the problem first before even thinking about how to fix it. While 'just thinking' on the other hand let you jump into solution right away, like if they were to stopped at the cleaning solution being the problem and then spend money and resources fixing that. It might work but you'll end up spending a lot of time and money fixing it if you didn't understand the root cause. Like what if you'd have to replace all the flooring to different materials because you found out that changing the cleaning solutions didn't help?? Had you started using Design Thinking in the first place, all you really needed to fix was turn off the light.
Design Thinking is thinking. But more importantly, it is a framework, and it is much easier to facilitate a team when everyone has guiderails. The problem, in my experience, is that other traditional problem solving frameworks limit innovation where Design Thinking is a framework that keeps that as a priority.
He used a cool example of design thinking that general people can understand. While you can use design thinking framework to solve any kind of problem, I don't think that example really let the beauty of design thinking shine as bright as it could. I think of design thinking as a philosophy, rooted in empathy. Empathy is the ability to see/understand things from the perspective of another person. Design Thinking shines the brightest when the problem you're solving involve people. Design Thinking takes you through a journey of understanding who's really experiencing the problem and all the nuances specific to the people experiencing that problem. The reason why I love design thinking so much is because it helps you solves real problems not the made up ones in your head.
@@chiefeeth You are absolutely correct with the design thinking definition. It is often the simple solution that fixes a problem.
@@chiefeeth You explained that thoroughly and beautifully. Anyone who still insists what you described is "JuSt ThiNkinG" and asks YOU to explain again "WhAt MakEs It DeSiGn?" is demonstrating THEY simply aren't capable of understanding it or doing it.🤷🏼♀️
Can be it he used for PhD research?
You pretty much just reinvented “5 why” analysis 😂😂😂
Your space needs design thinking.
That was more like a “5 whys” thing with the Washington monument example
isn´t that just the 5 whys to figure out the problem? something that came about with toyota a long time ago just reframed as design thinking
Seems like some people get annoyed by this trend because they don't like somebody else "taking credit" for a methodology they and lots of other people have essentially already been using. Isn't that kind of like getting mad at somebody else's guitar teacher because you already know how to play guitar?
He talked a lot but never explained the design system process. More fluff from the Futur.
Thanks for putting that spider in my face.
Solution building
sound quality is terrible!
Might be on your side, it's coming in clear on my side
Is this not the way everyone problem solves? No wonder nothing works 😅
The video is misleading by simplifying DT approach and giving a very superficial understanding by taking just one tool.
It’s a short practical example, not an over simplification of the entire process.
Nada nuevo, esto es marketing caro para enganchar a diseñadores novatos. El diseño implica el pensamiento desde toda la vida, y no hace falta que se llame Design Thinking. “Las personas primero”… gran descubrimiento… Quizás y sólo quizás eso ya lo había puesto en papel la Bauhaus hace algo más de un siglo atrás… Por otro lado, no pueden utilizarse las mismas fórmulas para cualquier proyecto, no es lo mismo diseñar un folleto para la hamburguesería del barrio que diseñar un logo para una aerolínea internacional. Y no es lo mismo tener toda una infraestructura como se muestra en el video que tener una tablet como toda herramienta. En fin, diseñador novato, si realmente quieres crecer y formarte y tener éxito en tu carrera, estudia de los grandes diseñadores (hago incapié en la Bauhaus). Este Eric tiene un buen speaching y una billetera gorda, me hace acordar a las publicidades de Herbalife…
Both of the examples you gave were not solutions!! What am I missing? You can't keep the lights off the Washington Monument at night. That's not a viable solution since people want to see it at night! And you never explained what the solution was to the growing company that thought they needed better software. You just asked a bunch of questions.
Popsi og krille