Concealed Carry: 38 Special Ammo Selection (Featuring Hornady Critical Defense Lite)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • Paul tests some 38 special ammo for concealed carry including Hornady Critical Defense Lite ammo.
    Shirts and patches from Tristar Trading Co:
    Other platforms:
    Rumble: rumble.com/c/P...
    Odysee: odysee.com/@pa...
    Paul's Patreon: www.patreon.co...
    This video was edited and uploaded by:
    Brad Nelson - minutemantheory.com

Комментарии • 1,5 тыс.

  • @PaulHarrell
    @PaulHarrell  Год назад +656

    Hey everyone, I said the HCD lite was an 80 grain bullet, it's a 90 grain bullet.
    Also, once again, you have NOT won a prize, that's a scam that management is helpless to correct.

    • @ftdefiance1
      @ftdefiance1 Год назад +34

      You mean I didn't win an official Paul Harrell hunting jacket straight from the Asian Sub Continent?

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 Год назад +9

      An interesting take on the impact deviation of various ammunitions would be also shooting them through a snub nose .357 like the Ruger SP-101. Since these revolvers can also chamber and fire .38 SPL. And would obviously also handle the hottest +P rounds.

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 Год назад +12

      No prize... 🥺😢😭

    • @tonyv8925
      @tonyv8925 Год назад +3

      @@ftdefiance1 🤣

    • @Leonardokite
      @Leonardokite Год назад +5

      But it had you logo on it, it must be real!!! 🤣 Now go have some BBQ ribs!!!

  • @prongATO
    @prongATO 7 месяцев назад +89

    I'm going back and watching all these videos and am so thankful that Paul made these but also heartbroken that these are the last videos we will ever see. I pray for you every day good Sir.

    • @RoadTraveler
      @RoadTraveler 6 месяцев назад +6

      Yessir

    • @DL-ij7tf
      @DL-ij7tf 5 месяцев назад +7

      Same. Just bought a dream gun of mine, a SW 19 so I'm doing the circuit of good .38 and .357 vids. Such a shame about Paul's health.

    • @user-nv5lh8ib1p
      @user-nv5lh8ib1p 5 месяцев назад +6

      They broke the mold after Paul. A great man.

    • @mikepraed4623
      @mikepraed4623 4 месяца назад +4

      I'm thankful I found this content and Paul. 🙏

    • @JohnSmith-f6o
      @JohnSmith-f6o Месяц назад

      He's not gone yet. There is still hope as he has looked pretty good in some recent videos. And YES I agree, these videos are a great resource.

  • @PPISAFETY
    @PPISAFETY Год назад +607

    Hi Paul. I found this video very interesting, because when I started in law enforcement my city had a 650 officer police department and a 300 officer Sheriff's department. My older brother who was my roommate at the time was a Captain with the police department, and became a Sergeant with the Sheriff's Department. I became super interested in police shootings from a medical standpoint so I got permission to read all the shooting reports, and time permitting, attend the autopsies in cases of fatalities. The results were eye opening. This was the very early eighties and every patrolman, and every Deputy who was issued a sidearm (jailers didn't get a sidearm) was issued a 4-inch S&W Model 64, and plainclothes guys like detectives got a 2-inch 64. The issue load for both guns was the Winchester Western 158 grain LSWC +P Hollow Points.
    Maybe the guys we shot at were not as determined back then, because it seemed like a lot of them gave up either when we first displayed weapons (this changed over the next few years) or would go down after one shot because they didn't wish to be shot again. But regrettably we were forced to kill 25 or so suspects in three years and I was able to attend the autopsies on most of those. It was instructive. The first thing I learned was that there wasn't much wrong with our duty load from a 4-inch. The bullet in that load was soft lead, so much that if you didn't have a pencil to write a quick note or phone number down, you could pull a cartridge from your loops and use it to write with. I had a very old school Sheriff who approved me to carry speed loaders after I demonstrated them, but still made me wear the 18 additional cartridges in the loops.
    Anyway, when I would attend an autopsy with this load from a four inch, the bullet was never classically expanded, but rather it was deformed and came out looking like a piece of parking lot gravel. It would typically be recovered on a chest shot just under the skin on the back of the suspect. The very few shooting autopsies I saw from the 2-inch guns didn't have as much deformation and on the four I went to, the bullet was recovered in the rear, stopped by a coat if the suspect was wearing one, or had been found at the scene directly behind the person shot, laying on the street. I didn't have a chronograph back then. We had no real complaints with this load other than as the streets got meaner, the officers wanted higher capacity so we went with Sig P226's loaded with some truly awful first generation 147 grain hollow points that were so bad that a lot of older officers got permission to keep carrying their .38's. These initial loads didn't meet expansion threshold because the FBI told us that a slow "subsonic" round was somehow magical and we believed it. They typically made an exit wound, and the number of rounds fired in a shooting went up. The rep of the 9mm loads that were too slow was so bad that we got all new guns in the 90's, chosen by a group of officers, male and female who chose the .357 SIG overwhelmingly after shooting it, which was, and is an amazing round for law enforcement.
    By the way, back when we still had revolvers we had a Federal rep try to sell us Nyclads. The rep's sales pitch was not increased performance, but rather reduced airborne lead on our indoor range, which is how Federal marketed the round I was surprised to see that you can still buy Nyclads.
    I had occasion to find some of the 158 grain +P LSWC HP Winchester load about three years ago after quite a search. I also bought some Federal in the same style. It was odd, both of them gave me around 925-950 fps or so from a 4-inch, but both were loaded with a noticeably harder lead bullet, and results in ordnance gel were disappointing to me. Lots of penetration, actually too much, with limited expansion. I bought a box of Remington HTP in that style and it appeared that Remington loaded it about 50 fps less than my old stash of Remington. So I sort of gave up on the 158 grain stuff, and after testing settled on the Remington Golden Saber 125 grain BJHP. This was noisier from my snub, but had less recoil and I bought a case of it in the 25 round boxes. I'm glad I did because it seems like Remington redesigned the bullet in their Black Belt line to address complaints of jacket-core separation. I think too much was made of this because that separation was taking place at or near the end of the bullet's travel, so who cares? All the backyard gel testers on RUclips apparently. Now the current Golden Saber load doesn't expand as readily from a 2-inch.
    As for the full wadcutters, that originally was sold as an accuracy load for target competition, and for that purpose it is great if one doesn't hand load. Those of us that did used full wadcutters that were even slower than the factory load. I remember that little piece of folk lore about turning a wadcutter backwards. I went to a firearms instructor school at FLETC taught by the late Jim Cirillo where he admitted to having done that in the 70's while a member of the NYPD stakeout squad, but he hastened to add that he would never do it in modern times. I loaded some up just to try the idea, and got results that were okay but not great, and I would not be carrying handloads for defense in any case.
    I think the advice to use full wadcutters that I've heard makes some sense when given in context. What I've heard expressed to new shooters who insist on carrying an Airweight J frame is that since there is hardly anything that actually expands from these guns, you may as well get the lower recoil and perhaps a sharp cutting shoulder as the bullet passes through. I'm not sure how true that is in practice, but for a new shooter, I say reduced recoil is a good thing., so maybe that might be a good choice.
    Well this comment is already too long, but I want to thank your for testing the Hornady Critical Defense from your snub on your ingenious meat target. I generally have had less than stellar results with Critical Defense in other calibers, but admit I've never tried them in .38 Special. When I carry a J-frame now, its an old Model 49, the all-steel version of your 638. I think I'll put a few boxes on my next ammo order and try them out.
    After all the gelatin testing I did before I got old and retired, I think we probably get better real world information when you shoot your meat targets. I know they must be a hell of lot of work to build. I thank you for all that work. I think I'm going to find your Patreon site and throw you a few bucks each month. You deserve it, and you provide a valuable service to the shooting community. I worked in the gun game for more than 40 years, and I still learn from your videos. Take care.

    • @PaulHarrell
      @PaulHarrell  Год назад +277

      Yes, I read the whole thing. Very interesting.
      Always good to get info from people with real experience/training.
      Sounds like your autopsies are showing the same results as the meat target (and the deer I've shot).
      And yes, I remember the FBI promoting the 147 gr. projectiles that didn't live up to the hype.
      Thanks for the input.

    • @bartgallant6897
      @bartgallant6897 Год назад +49

      This was a marvelous review. Thanks Paul. Exactly what was needed.

    • @Wanderlust2430
      @Wanderlust2430 Год назад +27

      VERY informative post, before this video I had been considering doing SWC or WC in a .38 as a cheaper and lighter alternative to current pricings of 9mm, but always put it off. your post, coupled with pauls results, tells me I'm better investing in a shoulder holster for my 9mm so my back problems don't impede my conceal carry.

    • @davidatticus5179
      @davidatticus5179 Год назад +24

      Thank you, sir. Good stuff. And not unlike Paul's, well reasoned upon real-world experience, with considerable effort expended. Retired as well myself, but my department wasn't particularly 'enlightened' when making these decisions, unfortunately. Your diligence most impressive!
      👍

    • @professorbuzzkill5700
      @professorbuzzkill5700 Год назад +17

      @@PaulHarrell you’ve nailed it! Every projectile has an expansion velocity, so the combination of pistol AND round make the difference! I lean towards the HCD also, and like that they can’t plug and fail due to the polymer. They’re also a bit more streamlined due to that construction, helping velocity, and the presence of the gel may help them expand at velocities lower than an empty cavity simply because the polymer already fills the cavity and is able to immediately exert force on the cavity walls on impact.
      It has always made sense to me in short barreled guns, revolvers or semi autos, to use lighter bullets to get velocity up, so your results make perfect sense. I don’t mind recoil or noise, so I’ll take the +P and the middle weight bullet in order to get expansion. Good expansion also helps prevent “over penetration” but for me that’s just a byproduct of good expansion, which of course I’ll take too.
      Your videos are the best for the self defense firearms user!! Thank you again!

  • @andrewvachon1943
    @andrewvachon1943 Год назад +587

    I am someone who has carried a revolver no further than my mailbox. And yet I still clicked this quickly because I have never not learned something from paul.

    • @OutsideTheTargetDemographic
      @OutsideTheTargetDemographic Год назад +14

      I always recommend to people "questioning" to get a cheap holster, and cheap airsoft handgun, and put both on the belt around the house.
      Good job on carrying at all. 🤓👍

    • @andrewvachon1943
      @andrewvachon1943 Год назад +12

      @@OutsideTheTargetDemographic Oh I carry every day, just usually either my p229 or my P365xl spectre comp. I own revolvers but I hardly carry them because they are, in my admittedly biased opinion, obsolete.

    • @OutsideTheTargetDemographic
      @OutsideTheTargetDemographic Год назад +8

      @@andrewvachon1943 My revolvers are BUGs, or for hunting/bear defense. Carry is usually a semiauto, unless I'm out in nature. All will do the job, if I do mine. Hard to conceal that 6-7-8 shot cylinder girth....

    • @andrewvachon1943
      @andrewvachon1943 Год назад +5

      @@OutsideTheTargetDemographic I lean more towards the autoloading 10 mills for hunting/bear defense, love my P320 xten, but i was looking at the ruger super redhawk alaskan for a bear gun.

    • @OutsideTheTargetDemographic
      @OutsideTheTargetDemographic Год назад +4

      @@andrewvachon1943 I have a 5 shot 44mag 4 incher for when we go out west, I'm stuck with 9mm and 45 for semis. Never tried the boutique calibers.

  • @tangolima6462
    @tangolima6462 Год назад +175

    I carry a J-Frame daily, thank you for doing this research. I have a hard time finding .38 Special ammo, and no means of testing it for effectiveness at the local ranges.
    I truly appreciate your efforts to educate on these matters.

    • @hirumaryuei
      @hirumaryuei Год назад +16

      Not trying to discount Paul's testing (it's great!) but Lucky Gunner does have ballistic gel tests for .38 that show penetration depth and expansion, which might also help you make an informed choice. I would also recommend checking their tests out.

    • @Stevarooni
      @Stevarooni Год назад +4

      @@hirumaryuei more info is always better, if you've got the time to digest it!

    • @tangolima6462
      @tangolima6462 Год назад +6

      @@hirumaryuei Thanks, I have seen the Lucky Gunner presentation. I think they do a great job as well. If I remember, they used a K6S and a GP100, not a JFrame.

    • @shadowwolf9503
      @shadowwolf9503 Год назад +5

      I always have some 158gr LRN 38 special ammo on hand. Unlike most people, I don't have a problem using it for carry ammo. Most 38 special hanguns are sighted in for the 158gr rounds and I believe the bottom line with this caliber, especially from snub guns, is shot placement and rapid, multiple hits on target.

    • @wahyasaquii7563
      @wahyasaquii7563 Год назад +5

      @@shadowwolf9503 Beware of over penetration. Old school cops called them "Widow Makers" for a reason.
      Stay safe out there.

  • @Seanomatic57
    @Seanomatic57 Год назад +335

    I do not own a firearm chambered in 38 special. I do have a fondness for videos from this American legend. ❤️

    • @jameschristiansson3137
      @jameschristiansson3137 Год назад +10

      My Sunday is complete.

    • @bjs301
      @bjs301 Год назад +6

      @@timetraveler1973 What?

    • @stuartjohnson5686
      @stuartjohnson5686 Год назад +1

      For shame

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 Год назад +3

      I inherited my father's Ruger SP-101 which is chambered in .357 Magnum. That means it will also shoot .38 SPL. What this video showed me is if for whatever reason I need to load it with .38SPL to use either wadcutters or the Critical Defense 110 grain FTX.

    • @bjs301
      @bjs301 Год назад +1

      @@TwentytenS4B8 Why don't you just load it with .357? I must be missing something.

  • @TheOfficialCaseMade
    @TheOfficialCaseMade 7 месяцев назад +31

    My favorite thing about Paul isn't the concise and articulate speech, the never ending supply of knowledge based on first hand, scientific results, or even the dry, perfectly delivered humor.
    It's the fact that even after demonstrating whatever knowledge he is trying to convey at great detail, he ALWAYS encourages us to take his results with a grain of salt and come to our own conclusions.
    In a world full of paid advertisers posing as gun aficionados, Paul is the absolute real deal.
    Thank you for everything you do for this community.

  • @asmith7876
    @asmith7876 Год назад +101

    I shot so many boxes of Remington 125 grain +P purchased at a local big box store…$13 a box. I miss those days. Carried a Model 60 .357 with .38 +P for years, recently switched to the Shield Plus in 9mm, with the 13 round magazines. Never miss a Paul Harrell video!

    • @chrisjones6002
      @chrisjones6002 Год назад +10

      I remember when wally world had the 100 round remington jhp in 9mm for around $20 per box. They had cheap target ammo too but they caved to the anti gun crowd and no longer sell pistol ammo.

    • @richardmendoza738
      @richardmendoza738 Год назад +8

      @@chrisjones6002 It now feels like a lifetime ago, and the end of an era.

    • @tonyv8925
      @tonyv8925 Год назад +4

      @@chrisjones6002 Yep, my local wallyworld here in Michigan does not sell any handgun ammo or 5.56/7.63x39 ammo either.
      They finally got in .22lr ammo by the case load at reasonable prices, different manufacturers too.

    • @richardmendoza738
      @richardmendoza738 Год назад +3

      @@hervvernon8911 oh man, what would we do without him....

    • @jazeenharal6013
      @jazeenharal6013 Год назад

      @@tonyv8925 I have been picking up the 325ct boxes of 22LR Federal at Walmart. I try to pick up a box every month or so. It builds up quickly, but I also have an AR chambered in 22, so I can go through them like candy when I get out to the range haha

  • @10thmtn86
    @10thmtn86 Год назад +15

    Another benefit to Critical Defense is that the pointy bullets make it easier to charge the cylinder holes under stress. Good video as always.

    • @455buick6
      @455buick6 Год назад

      Lol, is a "price" in whatever non english speaking country your scam originates from the same as a prize? 🤔

  • @craigdamage
    @craigdamage Год назад +159

    Every time Paul says "tedious" I know I'm about to be riveted.

    • @empireoflizards
      @empireoflizards Год назад +5

      I've noticed the same.

    • @tombrown4683
      @tombrown4683 Год назад +4

      Me too.

    • @LIGHTNING278TH
      @LIGHTNING278TH Год назад +9

      It's like when Hickok 45 says "I'm probably going to miss."

    • @datapro007
      @datapro007 Год назад +2

      I usually jump to the "crunch the numbers" instead of watching the entire chrono tests. I know it's heresy, but I admit it.

    • @NCrdwlf
      @NCrdwlf Год назад +4

      When he says tedious or dry, I get Stockholm syndrome.

  • @michaelschaffer9165
    @michaelschaffer9165 Год назад +46

    Paul thank you I've gone almost exclusively to 38 snubs and been wondering about the best load. I have been carrying a high velocity hard cast wadcutter from Buffalo Bore and Gold Dot 135s as a reload. I've invested heavily in both these and they both hit with the sights pretty good so I'm gonna stick here. But I respect the Hornady FTX a lot so I might work some of that in too. Thank you sir, you worked a long time on this one and it shows.

    • @PaulHarrell
      @PaulHarrell  Год назад +27

      We have a presentation that features a demo of the Buffalo Bore 158 gr. hard cast wad cutter.

    • @warrenkaye2486
      @warrenkaye2486 Год назад +3

      Thorough, informative, complete and excellent verbal skills to get it all out, simply the best!

  • @kevinc3427
    @kevinc3427 2 месяца назад +1

    One of the better and most informative videos I've seen from any guntube channel. Thanks man.

  • @Geekofarm
    @Geekofarm Год назад +3

    I find it great that Paul designs his efforts and logic so that it can be followed by people in a different situations to him and still achieve a concise, useful outcome.

  • @dougler500
    @dougler500 Год назад +3

    Thanks Paul, the effort you put into your standardized testing does not go unnoticed! I really appreciate your methods and honest rhetoric.

  • @ML-tl7kw
    @ML-tl7kw Год назад +19

    I too carry a 638 more often than any other gun I own for concealed carry. Of all the ammunition I have tried 110 +p PPU ( loaded with hornady ftx bullets from the factory) hit exactly where the non adjustable sights are.
    Great video Mr. Harrell. Keep em coming.

  • @chrisgunsandguitars1403
    @chrisgunsandguitars1403 Год назад +32

    I loved this video as the testing was of a common EDC handgun. Specifically the 638. I REALLY wanted the last meat test to be with the Speer GDHP as they make that 135grn +P with fast burning powders specifically for 1-7/8” barrels.

    • @mikepetrilla6004
      @mikepetrilla6004 Год назад +8

      that would def be a result I would like to see. as well as the Remington gold saber. I am going to go look back at some of pauls older videos he might have done this already.

  • @UnknownUser-fe5zu
    @UnknownUser-fe5zu Год назад +7

    Paul: “Todays presentation will be tedious and dry”
    Me: big grin sitting at work alone guarding a courthouse on a weekday for 8 hours.

  • @jtoker9758
    @jtoker9758 Год назад +30

    0:16 - bullets used for presentation
    10:09 - velocity number crunching
    15:04 - accuracy crunching
    19:06 - meat crunching
    28:55 - conclusion crunch

  • @rbhoward9123
    @rbhoward9123 Год назад +4

    Really do appreciate the "tedious" details Paul. I have a .38 spl snub nose Charter Arms 'Undercover'. I say valuable information provided considering I probably wouldn't shoot +P from mine although it has been stated in reliable literature that I could. My C.A. 38 spl was made in 1967.
    Anyhow, I'm what you call a dedicated listener and thanks for making this .38 special conceal carry ammunition video !

  • @TimberwolfCY
    @TimberwolfCY Год назад +2

    Never considered a .38 video all that big a deal, but it was fascinating watching your material as always, Paul, and that really was a lot of great info and of course great presentation. Thanks again

  • @michaelmartin6476
    @michaelmartin6476 Год назад +3

    Thank you for this vid! Happened to obtain a beautiful Model 36 "Chief's Special" (on recommendation of Chief of Police Cousin) back when everybody just HAD to have a .44 Magnum. Thanks to your vid, I can narrow down the better ammo to use for CC.

  • @michaelmcgourty9535
    @michaelmcgourty9535 Год назад +2

    Paul is the BEST! I always learn something in his videos.

  • @edb4526
    @edb4526 Год назад +51

    Tedious and dry = Comprehensive and factual

    • @YouveBeenMiddled
      @YouveBeenMiddled Год назад

      Wait right there, Paul. I'm grabbing a strong beverage to fully absorb into this material.
      ...
      Ok, ready!

  • @marshallharper3005
    @marshallharper3005 Год назад +1

    I carry that exact . 38sp+P 110g (with the ballistic tip)in my 4"barreled Taurus 687. I also practice with it regularly. It's a well designed and consistent ammo. Very accurate for me. Thanks Paul for always being a source of wisdom and experience. This time you confirmed something for me.

  • @forgedindarkness6393
    @forgedindarkness6393 Год назад +49

    I used to carry a S&W 642 myself because it was easy to carry. At first, I made the mistake of thinking I was strong enough to handle 158 gr+P because "you won't care about recoil." After shooting 10 rounds of Buffalo Bore +P 158 grains, I gave up because my hand got a blood blister. Almost never wanted to carry the gun or ammo again until I using the 110gr +P FTXs. I found them accurate, easy (enough) to find at my local stores, powerful enough, and actually bearable. Story aside, a lesson I learned was that shootability of your ammo becomes important so you'll actually train with it at the range more than once. I found this especially applies to lightweight guns like the S&W 637/638/642. This is why I gave up on 158gr +Ps like Federal and BB.

    • @AlekseySh1982
      @AlekseySh1982 Год назад +8

      Buffalo Bore also produces standart pressure .38 sp ammo. Still little bit more powerfull than Federal, Rem etc +P:).

    • @glennsammon4465
      @glennsammon4465 Год назад +6

      buffalo bore plus p 38 spec ammo is a 357 short magnum.have you ever crony tested that stuff? it comes out well 1000 fps. no wonder your hand hurt. must have been lots of fun shooting it out of a 14.5 oz gun.😀

    • @wildweasel8564
      @wildweasel8564 Год назад +4

      If I go without shooting for several months, I too develop deep blisters on my inner thumb when shooting Air Weights. I make it a point every time going to the range I put at least 25 rounds through one of my J-frames to keep the calluses on my hand thick.

    • @margarethouse404
      @margarethouse404 Год назад +1

      158 +P from 13oz M37 was all the fun I would care to enjoy .
      It * could * be done with acceptable speed and accuracy . but 50 rds of it would leave the shooting hand hurting into the next day .

    • @PPISAFETY
      @PPISAFETY Год назад +5

      You make an excellent point. Every time I see someone in a video (not Paul) shooting one of the Scandium framed mini-magnums, I wince in sympathy. That really can't be fun. When I was younger I could ignore recoil, but my hands and wrists just can't take it now. I carried an Airweight J-frame for about 30 years, but now that I'm older I have had to pull out my old Model 49 steel frame to carry. That is much easier for me to handle without pain all the next day when I shoot it. The difference in weight between it and my Mode 638 is only six ounces. In my cargo shorts I can even pocket carry it. By the way, has anyone noticed the price difference between an S&W Airweight and a new steel-frame J? It's a lot and I don't fully understand why.

  • @Hutzjohn
    @Hutzjohn Год назад +1

    Damn good thing he put this video up I was starting to get the DT's from not having a "Paul" video in 13 days!

  • @DaClosetGoblin
    @DaClosetGoblin Год назад +21

    You posted this video mere days after I bought a .38 snub for a backup concealed carry. Thanks a bunch, Paul. Your content is extremely helpful

  • @michaelheiss4456
    @michaelheiss4456 Год назад +1

    I've had Springfield XD 40's and 357 Sig and haven't noticed any significant amount of recoil in either caliber , the Sig might be a bit louder but then again I'm used to the Blast and Flash and Recoil and I am partial to the round , especially 125gr Jacketed Hollow points , 158gr Federal Soft Point ammo for out in the woods ! Thanks , Paul for the awesome videos , The 135gr Speer Gold Dot +P ammo I must have missed in the Meat test in this video , I've seen others where it expanded perfectly !

  • @baird329
    @baird329 Год назад +7

    Glad to see that the 80 grain regular pressure had some expansion. A lot of hollow points in regular pressure don't expand out of a 2" barrel. I have a couple of non plus p 38's that might benefit from some Hornady 80 grain ammo. I've carried wad cutters in 60 and 70 year old pre plus p revolvers figuring a perfect circular hole in the intended target is better than no expansion out of more conventional ammo.

    • @missingnola3823
      @missingnola3823 Год назад

      Hornady does make a 110gr. standard pressure .38spl. I haven't shot any meat targets with it, but I believe Paul has on prior videos. Might be worth looking through his back catalog of .38spl videos and seeing if it is available in your neck of the woods.

    • @duaneridings6591
      @duaneridings6591 Год назад +1

      The NYC cops called the wide cutter nickname " one per customer "

  • @virgilhilts3924
    @virgilhilts3924 Год назад +1

    Your video again proves what I have been saying for decades...
    158gr LRN and 148gr WC continue to be the best choices for 3" and under revolvers 😊

    • @shadowwolf9503
      @shadowwolf9503 Год назад

      I have carried many different 38 revolvers over the years. I've always felt very comfortable loading up with the 158gr LRN round. I currently own and carry 2 S&W model 642's. They are both loaded with the 158 LRN.

  • @tomahawk1911
    @tomahawk1911 Год назад +41

    Great presentation, thanks Paul. I’m always amazed at how far back you stand from your sky screen to test ammo MV. I have no personal experience doing that, but have observed a couple fellow gun club members over the years testing their reloads, with the sky screen set up about 12” in front of the bench. I admire your steady marksmanship with all the different rifles and pistols you test. Especially the snub nosed revolver ammo tested on this video. Expert level shooting, bravo!

    • @kirk2767
      @kirk2767 Год назад

      Why doesn't he set the sky screen closer?

    • @tomahawk1911
      @tomahawk1911 Год назад +2

      Wondered that, myself. When I’m warmed up, at my best, I could put rounds thru those wires at 7-10 yards,,,, most of the time. But I’ve got to admit, I pitch a flyer a few inches out there, now and then. I would not attempt firing a snub nosed .38 revolver, thru those wires, from 10 yards out.

    • @7.62nagant7
      @7.62nagant7 Год назад +5

      @@kirk2767 I think the idea is that since the average distance for self defense shootings is 7 yards (according to the FBI) he is testing the ammos velocity at a practical use distance. So this way the number he gets are what would really be transferred to the target. Same as him shooting the meat target from 7 yards

    • @sheldoniusRex
      @sheldoniusRex Год назад +3

      According to my fuzzy memory of an explanation given by an old timer, if you are too close to the chrono unburned and still burning powder can mess up the results.
      That said, not sure why Paul shoots from 21 feet except for the aforementioned notion of getting data at "typical self defense distances."

    • @garyK.45ACP
      @garyK.45ACP Год назад +1

      I use an old Pact 1 Chrono that has worked perfectly for 30 years. I usually set the screens 5 yards in front of the firing point for handguns and smaller caliber rifles and about 7-10 yards for larger centerfire rifles.
      The muzzle blast can cause a lot of error readings if it is closer. The Pact locates only the skyscreens downrange, the expensive part stays safely on the bench with the shooter. Newer models may be more resistant to muzzle blast. 🤷‍♂
      You can mathematically correct for muzzle velocity easily enough...if you want to split that hair. I don't.
      As a handloader I am not necessarily trying to squeeze the last foot-per-second out of a load. I want consistency. Low standard deviation and ES. I'll trade 20, 30, 50 fps average velocity for single digit fps SD any day of the week.

  • @workingguy6666
    @workingguy6666 Год назад +2

    So awesome - I kept checking to see if Paul uploaded his video yet.

  • @Philippians--co6ww
    @Philippians--co6ww Год назад +11

    Outstanding video as always.
    Several years ago an elderly shopkeeper in Coffeyville Kansas dropped a 250 pound thug with a single shot to the centerline of throat. Round was a standard velocity wadcutter in .38 special. Dirtbag died pretty much in his tracks. SHOT PLACEMENT

  • @HumphreyHorsehead
    @HumphreyHorsehead Год назад +7

    Excellent video as always Paul. My favorite gun is my 70s Detective Special and I carry it with standard pressure Hornady CDs because I want it to last. Of my selection of carry guns it has the fastest draw and ties with my PPK/s for best natural point aim, so I don't feel under gunned without +P ammo.
    If I have to go somewhere where I am at more risk than normal in my small town, the big city for example, I always bring my commander 1911 and it's Hornady Critical Duty 45s.

    • @PPISAFETY
      @PPISAFETY Год назад +2

      I foolishly sold my last Detective Special to a collector and now wish I hadn't. I carried them as my ankle gun for all the years I served as a police officer. Truth be known I think the Colt Detective Special, or something like it is almost perfect for the person who does not go in harm's way on purpose or to make a living. A six shot snub covers the kind of thing that actually happens to private citizens as opposed to what they think will happen. I also can't argue with your selection of a "heavy gun" either. I got my first Commander used when I had just graduated high school almost 50 years ago and have owned one ever since. Stay safe. Love your screen name!

    • @glennsammon4465
      @glennsammon4465 Год назад +1

      I have pre, and post 72 DSs, COBRAs and AGENTs and love them. and mostly shhot wadcutters in them (and carry) as well as hornady cd standard pressure. never felt undergunned, even when using them for work.

    • @HumphreyHorsehead
      @HumphreyHorsehead Год назад

      @@PPISAFETY thank you for the kind words. I have found that I also favor the 1911 in winter when people are wearing heavier clothing.

  • @sombra6153
    @sombra6153 Год назад +4

    I appreciate Paul’s knowledge and efforts. Demonstrating .38 Special loads from a two inch barrel is always of interest to me. A .38 Special handgun was the first handgun I ever fired, and Ive always had at least one around since I’ve been old enough to buy handguns. While there’s a lot of emphasis places on the new high tech hollow points, others that test to FBI protocol don’t show significant performance improvements with the more modern designs from a two inch. I’d carry Gold Dot 135 short barrel if I could find it. Light fast bullets such as Critical Defense don’t shoot point of aim out of a two inch but 148-158 grain does. I am amused by the controversy on other sites over his signature meat targets not being based in scientific reality like ballistic gel. Why people get wrapped up around the axle over that I don’t know.

    • @Florkl
      @Florkl Год назад +1

      Yeah. Ballistic gel is uniform, but that’s not necessarily a good thing. Human bodies don’t tend to be uniform. I get that the gel is factoring that in and, unlike what many people try to say, 14” of gel penetration doesn’t necessarily mean 14” of human penetration- it just means enough penetration for the FBI’s needs, but sometimes I’m curious to see what the performance in a different type of analog is.

    • @PPISAFETY
      @PPISAFETY Год назад +1

      @@Florkl You know, 10% ordnance gelatin was most useful in awarding law enforcement ammo contracts where companies whose product was not selected didn't really have grounds to sue if you did the whole battery of FBI tests with each ammo submission in the exact same way in the exact same media. The gel also only serves as a composite of the various soft tissue densities found in a human body. But at the advent of testing everything in gel, there were some really effective police loads that we knew worked in real world shootings that didn't meet the standard in 10 percent ordnance gel. Most notably the full power 125 grain .357 Magnum loads that nobody ever complained about in the real world, but would only penetrate 10 inches in bare gel and were often disqualified because of that somewhat arbitrary standard.
      One department I worked with settled on the .357 SIG, a dynamite police duty round but in our testing it would routinely only make 10 inches in bare gel. Speer's solution as the time was to shave 100 fps off their police load, dropping muzzle velocity from 1,450 to 1,350 to get it to go 12 inches in bare gel. That wasn't such a bad thing because it make the round more controllable, and it was still a great round so no harm done. In the early days of FBI standards there was a lot of argument and not a lot of science going on. The standards were finally argued until both sides got something they could accept that was published as the final version. The standards ended up being basically okay for a patrol cartridge but for the first few years some agencies refused to accept then, such as the Secret Service, the Air Marshals, and the Naval Investigative Service, (now NCIS) who all felt they wanted less penetration since they didn't do patrol and were not going to have to defeat barriers. But after about ten years a department could not practically buy duty ammo that didn't meet the FBI standards so they all ended up using them. Having done gelatin testing for years, I really think the average civilian shooter gets more useful information from watching Paul shoot his meat targets. Most of the gelatin tests on RUclips are not conducted properly anyway.

    • @Florkl
      @Florkl Год назад +1

      @@PPISAFETY Agreed. I definitely think a uniform and easily replicated test is important to have. When I buy ammo, I generally want to know it meets FBI specs, as defined by penetration in 10% ballistics gelatin at a specific temperature. I also like to see what the ideal wound channel is, usually by looking up a youtube video of someone shooting some very non-spec ballistics gel (reasonably certain on a hot summer day the gel is not at temp specs). I also love seeing what a round does in something less repeatable but also more realistic target, like a slab of meat and ribs and maybe oranges (in fact, I started carrying Xtreme Defender after seeing what they did to slabs of brisket). Different tests do different things, and to say one test is better than another needs context. In the context of Paul’s audience of ordinary people trying to find the best option for staying alive, I think he’s picked the right kind of test.

  • @The_Hi_Life
    @The_Hi_Life Год назад +2

    Nice presentation OG! I carry Hornady CD 110 grain +p in my Taurus 856 snub for my EDC and I feel well protected. They are most always a top performer, and readily available.

  • @Snuffy03
    @Snuffy03 Год назад +26

    I have used a .38 special in dire straits. I have found that the 148gr. wadcutter is an excellent close encounter round. The wadcutter is a hard hitter at gunfight ranges and punches a neat hole.

    • @WinstonAug
      @WinstonAug Год назад +3

      Was the recoil significantly lower with the wadcutters?

    • @jakubfabisiak9810
      @jakubfabisiak9810 22 дня назад

      @@WinstonAug obviously, I cannot speak for the man, but as someone who has fired all kinds of rounds from a S&W 638 airweight, I can tell you that wadcutters have significantly lower recoil than even standard pressure 158 grain rounds. Subjectively, felt recoil is similar, or a bit less than standard pressure 158 grain out of a Colt Detective Special steel frame, which is a good 50% heavier, than the airweight S&W.

  • @patrickjones8255
    @patrickjones8255 Год назад +10

    I like those critical defense +P's in my Cobra. They seem to have very reliable performance from every test I've watched, they have a very manageable recoil, and hidden benefit. I like to carry speed strips in my pocket much of the time and with the FTX tip I don't worry as much about rubbing a bunch of lead out in my pants.

    • @glennsammon4465
      @glennsammon4465 Год назад +2

      I hope that is the new all stainless Cobra you have because Colt said the old aluminum frame Cobra like I have is not rated for Plus P ammo. they said check the frame for cracks after every 1000 rounds. once the frame cracks the gun is finished and ready for the scrap heap. I have several Colt revolvers and have been collecting them for a while.

  • @chrisjones6002
    @chrisjones6002 Год назад +76

    I have to say the Critical Defense line always seems to be a solid performer. It might not always be the "best" choice for every caliber but I don't think it's ever a bad choice either. In my experience it's reliable in ammo picky guns and has mild recoil too. If I wasn't sure what carry ammo to pick it would be my default choice.

    • @JuggoJuggo
      @JuggoJuggo Год назад +2

      I always wonder if the defense, duty and hunter from Hornaday perform any different.

    • @john-paulsilke893
      @john-paulsilke893 Год назад +5

      If I don’t have time to test myself I always grab the Critical Defense. Obviously there are better choices in many calibers and gun configurations, but it’s a very good starting point because it has quite a good window of effectiveness and is less dependent on barrel lengths then most boutique ammo. (Still have Spear Gold Dot for my old .45 Colt 1911, not because it’s the best but because it’s the best that worked every time for at least 3 10rd mags in a row).

    • @FMDad-dm5qo
      @FMDad-dm5qo Год назад +5

      Largely agree. Hornady's XTP hollow point projectile is a consistent solid performer. It rarely if ever gives the most spectacular expansion but it generally will expand and penetrate in good balance. The "Critical" versions with the ballistic tip tilt it a little more toward expansion, which can help in less energetic calibers.
      Even in .380 ACP, it's a good choice. If you can get the XTP up to around 850 fps it will usually expand, while penetrating decently.

    • @jimcheatwood9009
      @jimcheatwood9009 Год назад +1

      @@ShutterManAce the critical duty is a bearer blind ammo so it doesn't expand as well.

    • @stevealexander8010
      @stevealexander8010 Год назад +2

      I suggest you take a look at the dozens of gel comparisons at Lucky Gunner labs ballistic tests. Federal and Winchester JHP generally expand best across many calibers, and Hornady is usually middle of the pack. Yes, velocity is a major factor in expansion, but so is bullet design.

  • @troy9477
    @troy9477 Год назад +2

    Nicely done. No big surprises. The 158's are at their best in a 4" or longer barrel, as Tom pointed out. I use them in a 4", and i have a 2" 64 that is notably accurate, plus a couple of J frames. And of course some 357's. I would pit in a good word for the 125 gr +p SJHP, especially the Rem version. It had a good reputation back in the day, and often fragments a little, at least in a 4" gun. It will probably not group as high either, due to less barrel time than the 158's. We are blessed with a lot of good ammo to choose from. I am partial to Gold Dots for snubbies, but i will give the CD a try. I like their 44 Spl load, and some others.

  • @boingkster
    @boingkster Год назад +32

    You know what? I'd rather have 38 Spec of any variety than nothing.
    Cheers for all you do Paul!

    • @jaredwright1655
      @jaredwright1655 Год назад +2

      If it means you are able to carry everyday and comfortably. That said small guns are just harder to shoot sometimes but thats why we practice

    • @douglasdavis8395
      @douglasdavis8395 Год назад +2

      @@jaredwright1655 - I agree with boingkster! I'd rather have a flintlock than nothing! (It's not very good on follow-up shots, though.)

    • @MongooseTacticool
      @MongooseTacticool Год назад

      @@douglasdavis8395 Though if you hit, it's not going to need another 😀

    • @douglasdavis8395
      @douglasdavis8395 Год назад

      @@MongooseTacticool - With .58 or .75, probably not!

    • @kevincrosby1760
      @kevincrosby1760 Год назад +1

      @@jaredwright1655 Key concept right there. The best handgun in the world is useless if you are downtown and the gun is at home.
      I have it on good authority that even a little .25ACP looks like a train tunnel when you are staring down the wrong end of it. I've also found that even the most vocal detractors of the .25ACP all agree that they really wouldn't want to be shot with one at close range. I have my EDC weapon, but the little MP-25 is generally lurking around somewhere close.

  • @FindersKeepers88
    @FindersKeepers88 Год назад

    Thks Paul & crew, You've done the work and showed the results in the best/multiple perspective. I'll get some of that Honady Critical Defense 110gr +P for our defensive revolver

  • @308dad8
    @308dad8 Год назад +5

    Glad you mentioned that every individual gun will have its own individual preferences. Also glad you shot the meat target with the Wad Cutters. Also one more criteria that would make Wad Cutters a good choice for personal defense is if your EDC shoots Wad Cutters better than the various Hollow Points. I have one that’s ridiculously difficult for me to get any good groups and impossible to get POIs that match POA. Honestly think a 4-6” Model 10 would be a better carry gun than my particular S&W M&P Bodyguard 38.

    • @glennsammon4465
      @glennsammon4465 Год назад +1

      i like WCs out of my snubbies. low recoil, accurate low noise. and i think they performed well here. they are not designed to expand but there was a little.and they did not over penetrate . seems good to me. my old Colt Cobra is with me as I write this and WCs are what is in them.

    • @davep4610
      @davep4610 Год назад

      @308 Dad As my first gun I bought an S&W Bodyguard 38. For me, personally, I find that I really don't shoot accurately beyond 10 yards with the double-action. So I bought an S&W model 637 that is single-action / double-action. I like this 637 a lot better -- up close for a home invasion I would use double-action, but I have single-action available for any situation beyond 7 or 10 yards. For the shooting I would love to get a 4 or 6 inch barrel large frame gun (357 shooting my 38 ammo), but that is too big to "carry", for me, except in something like a shoulder bag.

  • @Camera1931-p5v
    @Camera1931-p5v Год назад +1

    Great job Paul! Thanks for all you do!

  • @l.peytonadams8570
    @l.peytonadams8570 Год назад +24

    Elmer Keith bullet he developed in 44 magnum is a well thought out design for the large mammal he was going to shoot. Every bullet has a target weight it is being used on and every gun has a favorite bullet in your shooting hands. All excellent points brought out in a good presentation as always.Elmer was wanting something his No. 5 could shoot hunting game he tracked on horseback and needed to be comfortable hours in the saddle carrying. A subnose in an urban environment is meeting a different need and your data answered a lot of questions clearly and concisely.

    • @thebenches360
      @thebenches360 Год назад +2

      When I was 5, and got my 4in 66 SW the bullets I most often loaded for it were 158gr KEITH SWC in .38Spl. Started molding them myself at 7. Still loaded .38Spl loads with them(4.5gr of Unique powder) for most shooting, but also loaded them in .357(7.7gr of Unique) for "fun" loads. So the Keith SWC was prevalent in .357 caliber as well as .44(which is my general load in my .44s today).

  • @stottsfineart9481
    @stottsfineart9481 Год назад +1

    I appreciate the info. I can tell you put alot of experience and hard work into these videos. Thank you.

  • @mattcolumbia7948
    @mattcolumbia7948 Год назад +12

    My Sunday just got better.

  • @chrismangold1630
    @chrismangold1630 Год назад +1

    The hollow base on the back of the wadcutter expanded the base for a better seal in the barrel and more accuracy in competition.

  • @joshmcej
    @joshmcej Год назад +28

    My budget lives vicariously through Paul Harrell videos and his acquisition and usage of ammo.

  • @keithplymale2374
    @keithplymale2374 Год назад

    I have standard .38 spl. and 9mm Hornady Critical Defense in both my Charter Arms revolver and my Beretta 92FS. I adopted that after Paul's testing from a few years ago.
    I have Remington .357 125 gr SJHP in my Ruger GP 100. I got a 100 round box cheaply from Wal-Mart when they pulled all hand gun ammunition. This has a 6" barrel.
    Glad to see Critical Defense performing as far as the meat target is concerned performing consistently.

  • @jimdavis2385
    @jimdavis2385 Год назад +11

    I often carry my Ruger LCR chambered in .38 + P and carried in a pocket holster. It's very light and I think perfect for shooting at close range. I have a 9mm that holds 15 + 1, but only carry it when I have a way to conceal it. Hopefully, I'll never have to use either one, but if I am robbed or assaulted by a person at close range I can shoot a fairly tight pattern without having to look down the barrel. Love your channel

  • @leepalmer3634
    @leepalmer3634 Год назад

    "Thoracic cavity analogue"..kudos for vocabulary. Love ya Paul

  • @Robnord1
    @Robnord1 Год назад +42

    This was a delightful video to watch! Not just because it's Paul, but because I have a collection of 38/357 revolvers and recently went from 357 Mag to 38 Spc +P 110grn _Hornady_ CD ammo in my carry guns. Thanks for another great video!

    • @rj1234100
      @rj1234100 Год назад +2

      How often do you carry them, and what are your carry guns if I may ask?

    • @Robnord1
      @Robnord1 Год назад +9

      ​@@rj1234100 Every day, almost everywhere. _Ruger_ LCR, 357 version with CT laser grip. I have two of them, and carry both at times.

    • @the_weed_in_your_garden9319
      @the_weed_in_your_garden9319 Год назад +4

      I have the Ruger LCR in .38 and also a 20" lever action that I often use and share ammo between the two

    • @justinriley8651
      @justinriley8651 Год назад +4

      you should stick with the 357 mag and 125 grain bullets there alot more powerful. you are neutering your gun.

    • @rj1234100
      @rj1234100 Год назад

      @@justinriley8651 How do they compare to bigger gr?

  • @samzach2057
    @samzach2057 Год назад

    I’m here for the meat test. The knowledge I picked up along the way is just a bonus. ASL always, great job!!

  • @TweeknTurtle
    @TweeknTurtle Год назад +11

    Thanks for this video on 38 special ammunition. My daughter carries a Taurus 856 model 2” snub 38 special and we found for her firearm the HCD +P 110 is the most accurate with her non adjustable sights and performs well with expansion compared to other hollow points we’ve shot and doesn’t tend to have a lot of over penetration.

  • @mongo5564
    @mongo5564 Год назад

    Any upload from Paul Harrell is a good upload. I love these videos even though I only carry a 642 as a BUG.

  • @tylermorrison7051
    @tylermorrison7051 Год назад +12

    Low capacity aside, .357/.38 is my daily go to round. .357 140 grain Federal Barnes Expanders and 125 grain Hornady CD. In .38÷p, I use 110 grain Hornady CD, and 120 grain Federal Premium Punch. Your "dry" presentation was of great interest to me. Paul.

  • @Everythingallthetime666
    @Everythingallthetime666 8 месяцев назад

    Paul is awesome, any gun question you can bet your butter he has answered it one of his videos.

  • @6Sally5
    @6Sally5 Год назад +14

    Very timely video! Having only carried auto loaders, my wife and I recently each bought Taurus 856 .38sp revolvers…because we didn’t have one! Turns out, we both shoot them better than our Shield 9mm. As I carry my safety-less Shield+ with one in the pipe AIWB, the revolver has a built-in safety of a more difficult trigger pull. The Taurus may take the place of my beloved Shield.

    • @hawks2252
      @hawks2252 Год назад

      Hopefully you got a good 856. I purchased one that must have been made on Friday night. After about 30 rounds thru it, the cylinder would not lock up. There is a spring and a pin that controls the lock up part. Spring was a weak batch that Taurus new about (so I hear). They sent me a new spring and pin and it works now, but my EDC is a sp101. Night and day quality difference compared to the Taurus, I will not trust the 856 as an EDC.

  • @bravofighter
    @bravofighter Год назад

    EXCELLENT PRESENTATION!!! Projectile design and terminal velocity are the keys to expansion. In real-world application, you might remember the mom who had dumped 5 rounds of HP .38 SPL into an intruder, and he didn’t stop approaching. This is why firearm and ammo selection matter. DON’T just take the gun shop salesman’s word for which gun is right for you! A minimum of 3” barrel, supersonic high-expansion ammo, and a reliable semi-auto pistol are worth their weight in gold. If the barrel isn’t long enough to build pressure or impart spin, it’s probably not going to get the job done, and if gas is escaping at the end of the cylinder it isn’t pushing the projectile.

  • @hardtack8776
    @hardtack8776 Год назад +6

    Good review as usual Paul 👍😎😊!
    Suggestion:
    If you want good expansion you might try some of the Federal HST 38 Special load.
    Seems to work very well in short barrels and was designed for self defense.

    • @PPISAFETY
      @PPISAFETY Год назад +2

      Wish I could find some of that for sale. Some of the tests I've seen look promising. If I could find a box or two I'd give them to Paul to see how they do on his meat target.

    • @hardtack8776
      @hardtack8776 Год назад

      Crazy how difficult it is to find the ammo you want these days.
      I still have a few boxes of the HST on hand that I stocked up on quite some time back, but haven’t seen any in stock anywhere for along time ☹️.
      It’s what I carry in a snub nose Colt.

    • @lylesmith5079
      @lylesmith5079 8 месяцев назад

      I think that Federa dropped the HST in 38 special.

  • @calmoceans6668
    @calmoceans6668 3 месяца назад

    Yet another phenomenal video.

  • @derrickgardener2148
    @derrickgardener2148 Год назад +9

    Meat target never lies. Way more telling then gel or water jugs. Thanks Paul 👍.

  • @garyK.45ACP
    @garyK.45ACP Год назад

    Thanks. Great video for consideration. A lot of people are still using small revolvers for self defense.
    As a long, long time bullseye shooter and handloader, I can tell you that the hollow base of the soft lead wadcutter bullets is intended to cause the base to expand on firing to tightly grip the rifling, regardless of the actual bore diameter between one revolver to another. Like a Minie ball muzzle loading bullet.
    When I fire them in my Colt Officer's Model Match revolvers (2) or my S&W K-38 revolver, they are very, very accurate. Low velocity, yes. I also use a loading of "Bullseye" powder that gives 2500+ rounds per pound of powder. Economical. And recoil not much greater than a .22 LR/.22 Magnum. They go down range and make a clean hole in a piece of paper. That's what their job is.
    I don't consider them self defense rounds, and YES, many decades ago I tried the reversed hollow base wadcutter and wasn't terribly impressed.
    I carry J frame .38 Special revolvers for self defense. I have a S&W Model 40, a Model 640 and, the one I carry most, a Model 642 +P Airweight. The Models 40 and 642 have been more or less retired. The 642 is lighter and marked for +P ammo. The other two are not. I also, less frequently, carry a S&W Model 19, .357 Magnum with 2-1/2" barrel and round butt.
    I presently use Buffalo Bore .38 Special +P 158 gr. Lead SWC-HP ammo in the 642 and the Model 19. I have been very pleased with the results of that ammo in both revolvers. It gives (chronographed average) 968 fps in the Model 642 and 1017 fps in the Model 19. I have tested them in gel, but not a meat target. Expansion is impressive from both guns.
    The loads are NOT pleasant to shoot in the Model 642! But they hit just slightly above point of aim at 7 yards. The Model 19 has adjustable sights and the sights are adjusted to that load at 7 yards.

  • @jimbolxvi6428
    @jimbolxvi6428 Год назад +6

    If I switch from my 327 Fed Mags and carry my 357 SP101 I load with Federal HST 38 but due to the wadcutter profile I carry Gold Dot 357 in my speedloaders. My friend and I tested this in our meat target variation we call the New England meat target because we use a Carhartt barn coat for the outer covering. But the 38 HST performed impressively in our testing.

  • @DrTramp-uu1hh
    @DrTramp-uu1hh Год назад

    Long time watcher and admirer of your videos. Since I live in a relatively low crime town and state, Cheyenne WY, I don't carry all the time but when I do, like to make a night time visit to an ATM or get gas, I usually carry an ex PD issue 38spl S&W model 10-10 with a 4" +P barrel.
    I use both factory jacketed hollow point ammo and a variety of ammo that I reload in it. For my reloads I use poly coated cast bullets weighing from 110gr tapered flat points with mild powder loads for target shooting to 148gr full wadcutters and 158gr semi wadcutters with hotter powder loads for defense rounds.
    I don't have a chrono so have no idea of the velocity of my reloads but they shoot well with managable recoil and give consistent accuracy. My goal is not to produce rounds that will blow through two fully armored guys and the car behind them but will penetrate deeply into a guy wearing a heavy winter jacket and do maximum damage to everything along the way.
    My alternate handgun for carrying is a 45acp S&W model 4566 with a 4 1/4" barrel, also an ex PD issue. I also reload for it with poly coated bullets and powder loads comparable to what I use in the 38 and with the same goals.
    When people ask me what I'd do if I had to shoot at someone wearing an armored vest that my loads wouldn't penetrate I tell them I'd aim for their crotch area instead. It's all about bullet placement. 🙂

  • @luthergillis5632
    @luthergillis5632 Год назад +10

    Another entertaining and educational video. Although J-frames are not for everyone, over the years I have probably carried one more miles than any other firearm. They certainly have their advantages and, I believe, are underrated. Thank you Paul.

  • @sstritmatter2158
    @sstritmatter2158 Год назад

    Fantastic video - completely thorough and informative. Thank you, Paul

  • @Archangel144
    @Archangel144 Год назад +9

    I was really looking forward to seeing that gold dot ammo on the meat target. Maybe that was in an earlier presentation? It seems like the gold dot often, but not always, performs well.

  • @charleywalker2982
    @charleywalker2982 Год назад

    IMO your test are closer to real world scenarios than anyones out there. I won’t even watch the gelatin junkies on RUclips anymore. Thanks and keep up the great work.

    • @kevincrosby1760
      @kevincrosby1760 Год назад

      I watched one "expert" who came to the conclusion that 9mm was king, and that .45ACP was about the WORST round available for self defense. He based his conclusions solely on how far the round traveled through home-brew gelatin blocks.
      Personally, I do NOT want a bullet that will penetrate 18" of gelatin as a self-defense round. I want something that will penetrate my target and then expend all of its available energy and stop in the middle. Any energy the bullet has once it has left the back side of the target is not helpful to me, and a danger to everything else.

  • @Salieri47
    @Salieri47 Месяц назад +3

    Positive thoughts to you, Paul. As I previously posted I learn something new everytime I watch this presentation.

  • @karsonbranham3900
    @karsonbranham3900 Год назад

    I don’t know about the resto of the keepers, but te “loner and driverless th PH video is the more I like it! Intensely compelling, and proof positive that the trusty 38 is very relative still yet today, given one dos their homework and selects the proper ammo, for their setup, and puts in the time required to assure it is effective and accurate.. great video as always Paul, you ar e the consummate professional”! If I dare say, the “professionals professional”!

  • @emtcubby
    @emtcubby Год назад +11

    Great info. I carry a Ruger sp101 - 3 inch - 357. Only holds 5 rounds but I have never felt under-gunned. I love my 357 rounds but with arthritis I need to carry 38 special in it on occasion. Having the option is great and the accuracy is great with either round.

    • @jw-sigp2258
      @jw-sigp2258 Год назад +2

      I have a SP-101 3” and love it. I use Remington green and white box 125 grain semi jacketed hollow points in it for carry. Unless I’m trail walking in which I then use 162 grain SWC gas check handloads with 2400 or IMR 4227 powders for 1283fps average from a 3”. For high volume practice I use that SWC at 800 fps using 38 special brass and unique powder. Also I’m with you on it holding 5 rounds being plenty.

    • @MultiSweener
      @MultiSweener Год назад +1

      Have it also.

    • @shadowwolf9503
      @shadowwolf9503 Год назад

      I carried a Ruger 357 SP101 several years back. My carry load was the Remington 110gr jacketed hollow point 357. That load is considered a 3/4 magnum load. Or, a 38 Plus P Plus load basically. The recoil is much less with these rounds compared to heavier weight magnum loads. And , as a plus, my local shop back then sold a box of 50 of them for around $15. Sure miss those days !

  • @skyraider1776
    @skyraider1776 Год назад

    Thanks very much for an excellent video. Much appreciated. I just picked up some Doubletap 140 grain hard cast Equalizer rounds for my S&W Model 12-2 Airweight.

  • @tahertz8544
    @tahertz8544 Год назад +9

    I would have liked to see the Gold Dot 130, against the meat target. Oh well great video as usual.

    • @mojavedesert-ul3jo
      @mojavedesert-ul3jo Год назад +3

      Speer 135 grain Gold Dot jacketed hollow point Plus P, but yeah.

  • @thefeatheredfrontiersman8135
    @thefeatheredfrontiersman8135 Год назад

    I always loved the Speer gold dot lineups. The Olney guaranteed expansion from a 2 inch 22 wmr.

  • @TheCharlesAtoz
    @TheCharlesAtoz Год назад +8

    I've missed you Paul. There is no one quite like you!! The analysis you do is unique to you. In my judgement. I don't find your tests to be tedious. There is subtle humor in almost everything you do, please keep doing it this way.
    Also, there are ballot measures coming up in Oregon about the 2A-- any thoughts?

  • @1stCrippleb
    @1stCrippleb Год назад

    Great info, first time watching your content, will be following and diving into old videos.

  • @bbmw9029
    @bbmw9029 Год назад +5

    I was looking forward to seeing how the Speer GD 135gr +P did in the meat target. But iti didn't happen.

  • @strydyrhellzrydyr1345
    @strydyrhellzrydyr1345 Год назад +1

    Another great... Well produced.. and we'll thought out video for us... Thanks again

  • @alexandermfernandez9283
    @alexandermfernandez9283 Год назад +5

    The 110gr. Critical Defense round seems to be the winner here . I've carried everything under the sun when it comes to .38special ammo , but I've never known what to expect as far as performance . Consequently , I'm going with the Critical Defense round . Thank you Mr. Harrell for educating us , you're truly making a difference .

  • @AgainstAllOdds357
    @AgainstAllOdds357 10 дней назад

    Every time I had an ammobselection question I came here. You will be missed.

  • @jimf1964
    @jimf1964 Год назад +10

    Great video, as always. You are always so thorough, and cover all the bases, in the amount of time you have for your videos.

  • @gavinhammond1778
    @gavinhammond1778 Год назад

    The only cat in the history of broadcast who begins a presentation by saying it's going to be long and tedious. Ofc I'll watch anyway. Thanks for the content.

  • @Xenophon1
    @Xenophon1 Год назад +6

    Great video. I was disappointed that we didn’t get to see the Gold Dot against the meat target. It was designed specifically for snub-nosed revolvers.

  • @StephenPoor
    @StephenPoor 4 месяца назад

    Hollow bases in wadcutters are presumably to allow the bullet to expand into rifling and yield greater accuracy.

  • @mini14head
    @mini14head Год назад +6

    Well done Paul.. Who could possibly not like this man's videos? Such an honest, neutral, well delivered and thought out dose of information.
    I'm going home tonite and dig out my I believe 642 Smith, and 158SP +P and give the springfield some time off.

  • @markyoung2981
    @markyoung2981 Год назад +1

    Excellent presentation thank you for your time posting this information.

  • @gregdodd4729
    @gregdodd4729 Год назад +6

    This is one of the best .38 Special concealed carry ammo videos I have seen.

  • @jaydunbar7538
    @jaydunbar7538 Год назад

    The hollow back helps with gas seal, the lead flairs making a better fit giving more consistent results

  • @MrBowser2012
    @MrBowser2012 22 дня назад +3

    Hard to believe this was just 1 short year ago and now Paul is gone. Sure am gonna miss him.

  • @roberttalbot1658
    @roberttalbot1658 Год назад +1

    I believe the "Meat Target" is very representative of the real thing.

  • @brucebello2049
    @brucebello2049 Год назад +10

    Thank you Paul, not the results I expected so a great learning experience once again

  • @jfruser
    @jfruser Год назад +8

    Well done, Paul. I have carried several loads in my SW638: FBI Load, BuffBore/Underwood FBInuclear loads, and others. I finally landed on the Fed 148gr tgt wadcutter. For me in my SW638, POI~POA at typical SD ranges, it has minimal recoil, and it is more accurate than any of the other cartridges I tried.

    • @glennsammon4465
      @glennsammon4465 Год назад

      I use WCs in all my snubbies.

    • @lornemarr
      @lornemarr Год назад +1

      What is more important than accuracy?

    • @alex9483
      @alex9483 Год назад

      That target wc is exactly what the fbi used to have when they carried snubs. Picked up a bunch from an fbi range master

  • @hu3.789
    @hu3.789 Год назад

    I used to carry a Model 60 with a 3" barrel. I compared it to my Model 642 with an 1-7/8" barrel. The extra length made a significant difference in velocity. In fact, it was about 100 ft/sec. I found a gun with the longer barrel remains relatively easy to conceal. Both revolvers are J-frames. Barrel length up to a point may be a consideration when selecting a revolver for personal defense. The difference in velocity might be enough for some 38 special ammunition to reach its expansion threshhold.

  • @donalynjameschapman5445
    @donalynjameschapman5445 Год назад +5

    Thank you for today's demo Paul, very informative as well as well thought out. I appreciate your knowledge and the fact you are willing to to share your knowledge with us. ''Practice on the range with your weapon of choice''... I find when I go out to Practice in my neck of the woods, I first have to cleanup after selfish gun owners that are very good at practicing and NOT so good at the cleanup after practice. What happened to the old saying "leave it better then you found it"...... maybe you can provide another demo in the future in regards to cleanup such as preparation before going to range, maintaining while practicing for easier cleanup and leaving it better then you found it. Would be nice one day to go practice and only have to maintain my mess. Thanks for all you do 👍

  • @chrispena4582
    @chrispena4582 Год назад +1

    Very Very much appreciated. Bc I'm a 38 special Fan boy

  • @ditzydoo4378
    @ditzydoo4378 Год назад +22

    Nearly 32 minutes of Paul and .38 Special goodness. Yes, please may I have some more. ^~^ Take away from this shooting. Paul found a great round for his S&W 638.

    • @prycenewberg3976
      @prycenewberg3976 Год назад

      Now we just need 38 minutes of Paul and .32 H&R Mag goodness!

    • @ditzydoo4378
      @ditzydoo4378 Год назад

      @@prycenewberg3976 or .327 Federal Magnum to cover all the .32 caliber revolver bases.

    • @prycenewberg3976
      @prycenewberg3976 Год назад

      @@ditzydoo4378 Yeah... but I liked the way 38 minutes of .32 talk mirrored 32 minutes of .38 talk...

    • @ditzydoo4378
      @ditzydoo4378 Год назад

      @@prycenewberg3976 ^~^

    • @exothermal.sprocket
      @exothermal.sprocket Год назад +2

      Gun Sam Revolver aficionado channel has done a lot of testing with the LCR in .327. He's also a great resource.

  • @johnochicago8457
    @johnochicago8457 Год назад

    Very informative video Paul. Thank you!!

  • @timothyarmesy990
    @timothyarmesy990 Год назад +5

    Seeing the differences in target placement of the various calibers/configuration, in my mind is invaluable in selecting ammunition for each handgun. Riveting presentation!