Yes I agree the 6400 is worth paying an additional $150. As noted by caliv0608 and others the current price difference (for me) is $599 versus $999. In this case I don’t think the 6400 is worth the additional $400-700. It seems in his closing statements he might agree.
You know the A6100 is good when all he can come up are nothing but BS reasons. - No premium feel? Who cares about that when you're busy framing. - No weather sealing? Pretty sure majority of people looking to buy a cheap mirrorless like the A6X00 line are non professional photographers who wouldn't be a photographer for NatGeo. - Viewfinder? It's a freaking mirrorless camera. - A tiny bit smaller buffer? Again, majority of folks looking in to the Sony A6X00 line are non professional photographers. No one of those would be using them to do professional sports photography. Overall this is a bad review of the A6100. I've seen better objective reviews for this camera.
4 года назад+57
Right now the A6100 is at 600 USD while the A6400 is at 900 usd. So for me it was a NO BRAINER, purchasing the A6100..
I had researched both and opted for the A6100. Between the two, I know B&H has a special body-only $150 difference. K&M is $300. Depending on where you order from from, date and specials, the difference is closer to $250-400 less for a 6100 for a turn-key package. On both models the lens and camera coupling are susceptable to weather. Yea on the S-Log. Some have commented that there's a lot you can do in post with Davinci Resolve. Yea on Magnesium feeling more solid than plastics. I had done some 200g vibration/drop tests on aircraft electronics and I agree with this comment: "Plastics generally do better when they strike a hard surface because the shell can flex slowing down the impact jarring the interior components less than a metal rigid body would. A metal body falling against concrete would be a hard shock to everything inside." Regarding features, going from a 6000 to a 6100/6400 is more significant wouldn't you say ? Having the Flip Up Screen, 4K video & Mic Input are significant. I'd like to see the price of the IBIS feature on the elite models come down as they are over-priced since the video still looks bumpy on the 6500/6600 Perhaps when the 6700 is introduced ?. As you see in many comments on lenses, price should be a factor in comparing the degree in which model 2 is better than model 1.
I actually upgraded from an a6000 because financially it makes sense in the long run. I sold off the a6000 before it lost its value at a great price and got a great deal on the a6400 as well.
Just bought an A6100....and now I'm currently boxing it back up. Thank you for this video. I found the A6400 for $100 more than what I paid for the 6100. Life saver bro!
Unless like me you have no use at all for those features that are missing on the a6100. I have the 6000 and there are certain features I always wish it has. The 6100 has those features and no more. I like that.
The a6400 is "so much better" is very subjective and not true for every use case. It might be true for a professional video blogger such as yourself....but for the average weekend photography enthusiast or someone who just wants to take great pictures and occasional video, saving $200 and buying the 6100 is the way to go.
If you frequently shoot in aperture priority, then the a6400 (also a6300,a6500,a6600) allows you to set the minimum shutter speed before bumping up the ISO. This is really handy when shooting sports shots. Sony calls it "ISO Auto Min SS". I use this all the time and really value this feature. The a6100 (and a6000) does not have this feature.
Can u elaborate further? Does that mean in auto mode or aperture priority, shutter speed can be go down too low that causes motion blur and so only option is to shoot in manual or shutter priority and let camera to adjust aperture and iso, right?
I've seen this 150$ thing mentioned a lot but for 900$ I got the 10 - 50mm OSS and the 50-215mm OSS paired with the camera and the a6400 is 1299 with just one mid range lense.
I planned to get this camera but got tired of waiting for it so I just got a 6400 instead. I figured for another $150, the upgrades were worth it. It is a big step up from the NEX5 I have been using for many many years.
4:30 ok bro I can handle all the walking youre doing to an extent... But as soon as you start walking backwards through an intersection without looking... Thats where I draw the line
The current retail price for the a6100 is $598. And $698 for the one with lens kit. For 598, the body is great to get 4k, flip up screen and AF tracking. You can use Portrait mode with contrast/saturation dialed down and grade that.
Bought the 6400 when it was released and no regreats at all. It’s a beast. I think it’s worth the price at all. No other camers can beat it when combining it with Sigma primes. But I wish 16-55 f2.8 was bit cheaper 🙁
I agree! I see no point in getting the 6100... after buying the 6400 I was a little upset when the 6600 came out but luckily and thanks to your reviews now I know I got the right camera.
@@wm1573 on the thing it says open box lowest they made an accident and listed a display camera but they cant give it so all they took off was fifty bucks for that error I was like dang I was hoping for 600 ish price not 800...but a6100 is a nice camera man
The price difference in Europe is even a bigger problem! 899 euros for the A6100 body only and 922 for the A6400 body only, 23 euros of difference! Just for the weather sealing and better EVF those extra 23 euros start to sound like a bargain when picking the A6400. I think the A6100 is a really nice camera however I don't think Sony really thought out well their pricing strategy with it (Much less in the European Union!)
I checked that weekend when commenting another video about these cameras and in some cases the a6400 was a few Euros cheaper. It probably will change in future but at the moment they cost the same here.
Now in the USA A6100 $648, A6400 $898 - body only. 250 USD difference. I like the A6100, it has a few limitations but image quality, AF, eye AF, are great. It has mic input.
Just bought the a6100 for $700 including the kit lens. For that price difference I’m perfectly fine with the features it’s missing. I’ll use the money I save to buy a nice lens or even a gimbal 🤷🏽♂️
Great video, but.... You are a little confused as to what White Balance means. I have seen you make the same erroneous statement in a previous video. White Balance refers to the color temperature of the image, not the brightness. So it controls how warm or cool the image is, not how bright or dark it is. Anyway- I really find high value in your content, so please do keep up the good work!
Hi Arthur, great videos I have followed your channel for a very long time, the quality is just getting better and better. Can I ask what hot shoe mount is that on the a6400?
I was just in this boat, from being a longtime a6000 user (6 years or so) I finally upgraded and went with 6400 just for the video profiles and better body
Superb, don't know why RUclips stopped recommending your videos, but doesn't matter cause I will never forget this channel. Really helped in finaliseing the decision to buy 3xA6400(2 for photo with 1st one with Sigma 16 & 2nd one with 56mm & 3rd one for video) instead of 2xA6100(photo work) & 1xA6400(video work). Please suggest an good macro extension tube for Sigma 56 f/1.4, also currently I am confused between Sony's 18-105 f/4 vs 16-70 f4 for shooting wedding videos with A6400. Also a good gimbal for that, previously did finalise A6100, 16-70, Boya BY-MM1 & Feiyutech G6 plus for travelling & wedding video work. But since, using S-log will be beneficial for proper color grading now finalised A6400. G6+ has limit of 800gms, now increased weight demands another gimball. Does power zoom helps a lot in video work?
Dear Sony: Give me an a6600 + an upgraded sensor + 4k60fps + 10bit and I'll give you $1,500 + tax. Thanks, Internet P.S. An improved IBIS would be great too.
RageCage1701 hahahaha. Sony will def roll out 4K60 on their full frames first, and then apsc at some point. And what you ask for will probably be 2000-2500 which at that point might as well go full frame
You probably have the electronic front curtain shutter turned on which makes it sound slower as it only flaps once. If it's turned off, it flaps twice making it sound faster. I agree, the a6100 should be $699 at the most.
People speak of 150 of 'not a lot'. Well, to some it is and if you use the 6100 for photography you'll get the same results as the 6400 and You've saved enough to treat 'She who must be obeyed' to a little something.
I have the a6500 and I love it. I don't think I have to upgrade any time soon although I would love a flip-over screen, that can be very useful. Great video, Arthur.
Thats what I like about your videos, honest reviews. Thanks for this review, I’m a 6000 user and i want to get a newer camera, now i know that i can put out of the list the 6100.
Nice job, keep to great content coming . I own the a6300 so have no plans to upgrade 😊 Are you planning to do a review on the new Sony 70-350mm aps-c lens?
Finally someone is pointing this out. I watched many reviews but none ended with this no-brainer verdict. In Germany the price difference is currently 80€.
I just got the a6100 because I got it for 589. I already have an A7iii so I’m using this for vlogging only pretty much. The difference was 300 dollars so for me it was worth it. I won’t be using the viewfinder much but really needed that flip screen and mic input. Totally agree if the difference was 150 dollars but found this on sale and jumped on it. Great videos man! Also have my original silver a6000 and another white a6000 modified for IR. 😆. Love Sony cameras!!
I think of all of the cameras in the a6xxx series the a6100 is the best value for photographers. For video it's the a6400. There are folks for whom the $150 difference can be a make or break decision.
The difference in price is around $300 not $150 based off your affiliate links. I'm looking to get into this format, with stock lens its a considerable difference
I've got the A6000 and was thinking of upgrading when they brought out the A6400, once I'd become immune to the cost of it here in Oz. Now there's another one in the lineup to consider. I wish Sony would name their increasingly better models in ascending order so I could keep track of what level to go for. :)
Sony are trying to do that. It looks like they are going to produce the a5100 and a6000 forever, but stop the a6300. The only confusing is between a6400 and a6500. I prefere my a6500 because of the IBIS and a better grip. I take pictures of landscape and architecture and not of people, cats and dogs.
I'm still shooting with the a6000. Been thinking of upgrading to a6600 or 2nd hand a6500 (much lower price) mainly to get the IBIS, better AF, bigger buffer, better EVF and bit better body. I may just wait until they upgrade the sensor. In the meantime I have just bought on good sale price the new Sony E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS which in my mind seems a better investment as I've decided I'm not going to go to a full frame system in the future.
Really great breakdown of the differences between these two camera, I hadn't heard some of these things mentioned anywhere else. It wouldn't have influenced any sort of buying decision for me, because I bought an a6400 before they even announced the a6100, but I occasionally wondered if I had just waited a few months whether I could have gotten everything I cared about and saved a little money. Seeing this has definitely put those thoughts to rest.
@Don Mega Having upgraded from an a6000 to an a6400, I have to say I would still take the 6400 even at a considerable price difference. So many small improvements, but the biggest one being that I was never really happy with the low-light performance of the a6000. High ISO images just didn't look good. I was much happier with the images I get from the 6400 even at higher ISO, and being happier with the output is worth the extra cost to me.
I always appreciate all these electronic reviews, but as with most electronics it’s always a numbers game. If you save $200 you can buy the next level camera. But if you save $500 you can get the next next size up. If you throw even more money, you can potentionally shoot the next Avengers’ film. Lol Getting good gear is important, but sometimes we forget to create. You have to remember that a lot of the tools released now eventually become obsolete a few years later. I appreciate this video in particular because I learned a few more things that I didn’t know before between these two alphas. But it just convinced me more about getting the 6100 as a starting camera, specifically because I’m going to be working indoors with a more controlled setting. Still, this was a great video. Thank you!
After watching this video, i am absolutely clear about the differences between the two. Thank u so much, you are making awesome content man, keep going!
Great video. I am going to upgrade my a6000 mostly for the auto focus. I don't do any video but may in the future. I was going to go with the 6100 but pretty much came down to all the things you pointed out. Also I believe the 6600 and the 6400 have upgraded shutters that are supposed to last much longer. Another thing is if you are really tight with money the 6400 is available used for a decent price right now.
I don't understand how it can be a 150 dollar difference in the states, but a 400 dollar difference in Canada, unless the price has dropped for the 6100 that much in this past year....
I’m upgrading my a6000 to the a6600 and can’t wait for it to arrive! Any tips for setting it set up and digging through the mountains of settings for video? I never got into video with the a6000 but it’s my primary purpose for the a6600
How can you determine the speed of the shutter from the sound? If they both are 11 fps, that is their speed. Your perception of speed judging by the sound is ridiculous. Otherwise a really good video 👍
I am upgrading from an a6000 to a6400. I shoot mostly video and even though i'd love the a6600 i can't seem to justify the price premium for the bigger battery.
I regret buying the A6400 about 1 year ago. Today i would buy the A6600 only because of the missing IBIS in the A6400. I use mostly the sigma prime lenses and the sony FE 50mm1.8 (fullframe lens) and none of them has OSS at all, that is a real bummer. I know the IBIS from the A6600 isnt the best in the world, but better than nothing. With the A6400 and lenses without OSS, videos are horribly shaky. And no, i dont want to carry a gimbal around all the time.
feel you man,,, I sold a6000 a6300 & a6400 in order to buy a6600, best decision, it's especially good if you have or planning to have full frame in future 💪
Coming from full frame Nikon D750, bought an a6000. Took me months to like it. Noise is terrible. Recently bought an a6400. Noise is better but I needed a new program to convert RAW files which I didn’t have to do with the a6000. Its many more steps now. Not the worst but worth noting. I adapt my a6400 with a Commlite Enf-e1 I believe it is to my Nikon glass and I’m finally happy I can do so successfully. My wish is that Sony sneaks a full frame sensor in one of these crop bodies for a super small package. THAT would be awesome.
I got the 6100 and I love it ! 6400 and 6100 is a minor difference. Almost the same thing other than the picture profile which I don’t use.. and the few other small differences you mentioned the 6100 is a amazing camera and I think it will do awesome I have two of the sigma primes but got the 6100 with kit lens last week for 750$ Can’t beat that price . I’m sure it’s a holiday sale , not sure if it will go back up but I felt that was great price 750$ vs a 1050$ right now for the same sale on the 6400. I feel it’s well worth that price I had the 6000 for a few years and I enjoyed it as well but the 6100 does offer a lot more and thankful for the headphone jack for sure ! Enjoy your videos Arthur !!! Thanks
I agree - now A6100 is 648 USD, A6400 898 both body only. Issue I have with the A6100 is the slow shutter speeds it picks in P and A modes with auto ISO, but apart from that, I am very happy
stefano giovannini Yes it’s great !! I love it They all a few issues if you want to look at it all .. The 6100 is solid and great at 749$ with a kit lens can’t beat it !
My video needs are well served by a variety of cameras .. a5100's, hx90v and an Osmo Pocket. I have decided to add an a6400 to the mix because of new work demands. They are showing up used here in Saigon for about $750 with a kit lens. Hard to turn that down. i didn't even consider the a6100 because there is not a big advantage over my a5100s. One lives on a gimbal, and another is used on tripod or monopod. I also have a spare one. With flip screen and touch focus, the little a5100s are hard to give up. Up until now, I've been investing mostly in audio gear and lighting.
Thank you for the information. Now I am sure to buy the 6400, its a better option than the 6100. I have a 6000 and i love all your videos about that camera.
Arthur, your info is timely and helpful. Bought A6000 when it came out and I want to upgrade. Had been considering A7iii, but now leaning more towards 6400 or 6600. I'm sort of an intermediate photographer. For a future video, I'd love to see tips for particular conditions, especially astro/night shots. Keep up the great work.
Hey Arthur, I have had the A6000 now for 2 yrs. I have done too much photographic but now I am wondering if I should trade up. If you recommend that I do, should I choose, the A6100, A6400 or A6500? Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks
Been using Canon 70D and I do mostly photos at low light and gloomy weather conditions. Planning to switch to sony along with the sigma 16mm 1.4 lens. Should I be worried about the battery life in A6000 for photos only? or Should I consider the A6100 given the budget is close to $1000.
@@starnight930 sorry I forgot about this . So I got it and went a few times for shooting , I don't post to much photos but I have and Instagram were you can see some of the photos I took with it , it's @diogoconceicaoph
Excellent Review. Thanks . Now the Sony A6100 dropped in price by $150 more. So it’s $598 for 6100 & $898 for 6400. Is $300 difference worth it now? I’m using my Sony A7iii as my main camera . I’m looking for 2nd camera for gimbal work for my events work . Thanks in advance .
I'm a relatively new live streamer on YT and looking to move from Logitech to a camera. You made a good case for the 6400 and it is certainly on my short list. Thank you!
I've had my a6000 for 2 years (almost 40k shutter count), this past week I've been considering upgrading to the a6600. I do a huge amount of scene/portrait shooting at night time/dark places with three fast primes (no OSS), IBIS will be a massive help. When there's no time to set up the tripod, I attempt handheld in burst mode and end up taking 100 shots of the same thing hoping 1 will be perfect. The native ISO is better but I don't know how much more it'll help in practicality. A lot of people I know shoot with a7 series but that's so much more money than I can justify for nonprofit fun, plus I'm thinking to stick with APSC for the well established cheaper/larger range of lens, and to stay a bit different from the crowd I guess. The new Sony 16-55 AF would be great, never used an AF/zoom lens yet.
What are the enhancements and, saddly in sony's case, downgrades they made to the 66000 in comparison to the 6400? I got a 6000, but after making a couple of bucks with it i'm planning to go for the 6400.
Sony marketing did screw up the price of the A6100. It's just too close to the A6400 as you say. I just recently purchased the A6400 based on the advantages over the A6100.
Now it is 650 vs 900 USD (A6100 vs A6400). it is almost 50% more. I was going to get A6400 but I got 2 A6100s. The main drawbacks are that there is no Auto ISO minimum shutter speed, and the A6100 chooses very slow shutter speeds (1/30. 1/60) in P and A mode rather than increasing the ISO to 800 or so. I compared to my old A6000 that instead tends to increase the ISO. Anyway I am amazed by the AF, it is so great. I shoot mostly portraits and lifestyle and that makes it framing and shooting so much better (love the eye AF improvement). Regarding picture profiles for video I can still lower contrast, saturation and use neutral color for video. EVF is not as good but I can live with it. A6400 is the best deal, but A6100 at 650 USD is pretty good. Many mirrorless at that price do not have an EVF. Main gripe is I can't really use P and A for street photography as the camera picks slow shutter speeds in Auto ISO (i have not seen a reviewer mention the issue, it would be great to push Sony to deal with the issue in a future FW update). Thank you for the breakdown. What do you think of the 250 dollar difference between the 2 cameras?
Went from a6000 to a6400 and I’m super happy. I believe the a6100 has a limited record time in video as the a6400 does not. Another reason to avoid the a6100.
I've already upgraded to a6400 from a6000. It's definitely worth it. I love the eye auto focus and flip up screen. I just need to get my hands on a gimbal.
ElliotsCreations I upgraded also from a6000 to a6400 a few months ago. Best camera I ever had. Last month I got the Weebill Lab 3 gimbal from Zhiyun Tech. I highly recommend it.
I bought the a6400 even though the Sony APS-C body is definitely not cheap and lacking in ergonomics, a6400 still is the the most reasonable choice among the 61/64/6600. Had the a6100 been priced $300 cheaper than the a6400 I would've bought the A6100 instead before knowing all the corners Sony had cut, now knowing the differences, I'd say the a6400 should be the minimum for an experienced shooter. P.S. I've been noticing this for a while that even though you're a casual shooter, the quality of your reviews is really good and is getting even better, with personal experiences not listed anywhere on specs.
If a6600 had included 4,2,0 400Mbs 60p internal we would have been all over it. Waiting for the next one, and add USB-C. Got the Fuji XT3 instead for those reasons. But the bigger battery, flip screen, IBIS and multishoe -along with smaller size is still such an advantage over Fuji.This year was a missed opportunity for Sony to get our money.
@Phil Jones65 but those "cut down" and "low-res EVF" complain is only ever mentioned by those who has access to the better (and much more expensive) device beforehand. Without such access, mainstream guys will buy it because they know (for now) that no matter how good a phone, a dedicated camera for mature photographer is still better than phone. They simply compare it to a6000 and if they can be assured that the AF is evolutionary, 150 to 200$ upgrade over a6000 should be still reasonable.
Finally taking the plunge, A6400 on a good special today in my town so I’ve ordered it. Thanks for your many informative videos, they helped me to my decision. Cheer!
I won both cameras and I can't tell the difference between the view finders. I paid 300 less for the a6100. If the difference had been $150 only, I would have gotten a second a6400 for sure.
I’m upgrading from A300 to a mirrorless model. I was thinking 6100, hobbyist getting back to photography after raising children. I have a Tamron 70-200 2.8 A mount and a 50 1.7 prime I would use with mount adapter.
For anyone watching this currently, the price difference is now in the $500-700 range on Amazon.
Yes I agree the 6400 is worth paying an additional $150. As noted by caliv0608 and others the current price difference (for me) is $599 versus $999. In this case I don’t think the 6400 is worth the additional $400-700. It seems in his closing statements he might agree.
@@michaelmorar1 Where are you finding it for 599??? wow not finding that anywhere
You know the A6100 is good when all he can come up are nothing but BS reasons.
- No premium feel? Who cares about that when you're busy framing.
- No weather sealing? Pretty sure majority of people looking to buy a cheap mirrorless like the A6X00 line are non professional photographers who wouldn't be a photographer for NatGeo.
- Viewfinder? It's a freaking mirrorless camera.
- A tiny bit smaller buffer? Again, majority of folks looking in to the Sony A6X00 line are non professional photographers. No one of those would be using them to do professional sports photography.
Overall this is a bad review of the A6100. I've seen better objective reviews for this camera.
Right now the A6100 is at 600 USD while the A6400 is at 900 usd. So for me it was a NO BRAINER, purchasing the A6100..
Right now the 6400 is 798 which I feel is the lightest I'm willing to spend for the extra features
I had researched both and opted for the A6100. Between the two, I know B&H has a special body-only $150 difference. K&M is $300. Depending on where you order from from, date and specials, the difference is closer to $250-400 less for a 6100 for a turn-key package. On both models the lens and camera coupling are susceptable to weather. Yea on the S-Log. Some have commented that there's a lot you can do in post with Davinci Resolve. Yea on Magnesium feeling more solid than plastics. I had done some 200g vibration/drop tests on aircraft electronics and I agree with this comment: "Plastics generally do better when they strike a hard surface because the shell can flex slowing down the impact jarring the interior components less than a metal rigid body would. A metal body falling against concrete would be a hard shock to everything inside." Regarding features, going from a 6000 to a 6100/6400 is more significant wouldn't you say ? Having the Flip Up Screen, 4K video & Mic Input are significant. I'd like to see the price of the IBIS feature on the elite models come down as they are over-priced since the video still looks bumpy on the 6500/6600 Perhaps when the 6700 is introduced ?. As you see in many comments on lenses, price should be a factor in comparing the degree in which model 2 is better than model 1.
No plan to upgrade from a6000 just a hobby. Rather spend the money to upgrade my lenses.
I actually upgraded from an a6000 because financially it makes sense in the long run. I sold off the a6000 before it lost its value at a great price and got a great deal on the a6400 as well.
I have a6000 and I order a6400
@@mohsin_sait What was the deal??
I upgrade my A6000 to A7III after using it for 2 years. I am a stock photographer and A6000 just doesn't cut it.
@@funkyjoshx sold it used for about $430 with the 16-50 lens. It was a year old.
Just bought an A6100....and now I'm currently boxing it back up. Thank you for this video. I found the A6400 for $100 more than what I paid for the 6100. Life saver bro!
I own an a6300 and my wife surprised me with an a6400. I'm pleasantly surprised by the difference. The autofocus on the a6400 is incredible.
You predicted correctly! Now a6100 price difference is about $300 to a6400. So a6100 make sense now
Unless like me you have no use at all for those features that are missing on the a6100. I have the 6000 and there are certain features I always wish it has. The 6100 has those features and no more. I like that.
Bingo, at the end of the day for photos, it produces the same image. I can deal with the plastic body.
yeah its not like I have love for Magnesium of post-processing 😂
The a6400 is "so much better" is very subjective and not true for every use case. It might be true for a professional video blogger such as yourself....but for the average weekend photography enthusiast or someone who just wants to take great pictures and occasional video, saving $200 and buying the 6100 is the way to go.
Recently upgraded from my a5000 to the a6400 largely due to you and your videos, keep it up 💪🏾👌🏽
If you frequently shoot in aperture priority, then the a6400 (also a6300,a6500,a6600) allows you to set the minimum shutter speed before bumping up the ISO. This is really handy when shooting sports shots. Sony calls it "ISO Auto Min SS". I use this all the time and really value this feature. The a6100 (and a6000) does not have this feature.
does the a6100 allow me to use auto ISO in Manual mode?
@@billyholic Yes
Can u elaborate further? Does that mean in auto mode or aperture priority, shutter speed can be go down too low that causes motion blur and so only option is to shoot in manual or shutter priority and let camera to adjust aperture and iso, right?
I've seen this 150$ thing mentioned a lot but for 900$ I got the 10 - 50mm OSS and the 50-215mm OSS paired with the camera and the a6400 is 1299 with just one mid range lense.
I planned to get this camera but got tired of waiting for it so I just got a 6400 instead. I figured for another $150, the upgrades were worth it. It is a big step up from the NEX5 I have been using for many many years.
4:30 ok bro I can handle all the walking youre doing to an extent... But as soon as you start walking backwards through an intersection without looking... Thats where I draw the line
Lmao
Same I clicked away
You killed me sir.
goddamn! same reason i disliked this content
Glad I’m not the only person, completely distracted by all the walking.
The current retail price for the a6100 is $598. And $698 for the one with lens kit. For 598, the body is great to get 4k, flip up screen and AF tracking. You can use Portrait mode with contrast/saturation dialed down and grade that.
Bought the 6400 when it was released and no regreats at all. It’s a beast. I think it’s worth the price at all. No other camers can beat it when combining it with Sigma primes. But I wish 16-55 f2.8 was bit cheaper 🙁
Hype beast
I agree! I see no point in getting the 6100... after buying the 6400 I was a little upset when the 6600 came out but luckily and thanks to your reviews now I know I got the right camera.
6400 seems way out of my reach. I don’t mind settling for the 6100.
It’s 600 at Best Buy right now plus tax for the 6100
Alisha Marie 700 where I’m at lol
@@randomdude189 900 where I'm at
@@alishabush6596 damn I got it the wrong month I just got it last month for 800 that 300 sure wouldve been nice for that underwater camera protector
@@wm1573 on the thing it says open box lowest they made an accident and listed a display camera but they cant give it so all they took off was fifty bucks for that error I was like dang I was hoping for 600 ish price not 800...but a6100 is a nice camera man
The price difference in Europe is even a bigger problem! 899 euros for the A6100 body only and 922 for the A6400 body only, 23 euros of difference! Just for the weather sealing and better EVF those extra 23 euros start to sound like a bargain when picking the A6400.
I think the A6100 is a really nice camera however I don't think Sony really thought out well their pricing strategy with it (Much less in the European Union!)
I checked that weekend when commenting another video about these cameras and in some cases the a6400 was a few Euros cheaper.
It probably will change in future but at the moment they cost the same here.
Now in the USA A6100 $648, A6400 $898 - body only. 250 USD difference. I like the A6100, it has a few limitations but image quality, AF, eye AF, are great. It has mic input.
Exactly u r right
From France
A6100 w/ kit lense £599
A6400 w/ kit lense £699
Euro bad
Connor Kitchen off course it would be cheaper in pounds £
Upgrading my a6000 to 🥁 drumroll 🥁 the a6600. 😬 I pre-ordered it this past weekend. Hopefully it'll ship out with the first batch on 11/29 🙏🏾
Waiting a week for black friday deals and I'll smash those affiliate links of yours. Happy to support a great content creator!!!
What's a black Friday sale?
@@nord7556 it's a weekend (Thanksgiving weekend) in USA where stores have a lot of products at a discounted price.
Matteo Sivilotti Yup, so will I. Looking for a sale on the Sony 90mm
Sony a6100 currently 649.99
@@davemunoz9742 6400 hasn't changed yet 😪
Just bought the a6100 for $700 including the kit lens. For that price difference I’m perfectly fine with the features it’s missing. I’ll use the money I save to buy a nice lens or even a gimbal 🤷🏽♂️
me too, picked up the sigma 30mm lens along with it for the price of an a64 cam body.
a6100 is a great camera,,, I just wish that in future all cameras in this price range & up will have IBIS as a standard feature
I think the A6100 is the hot ticket, especially for those wanting to step up from their smart phones.
I feel if I wanted to buy a camera now I'd save up for a month and buy the a6400
Literally upgraded from shooting on a phone for five years to this. It’s perfect for me!
What about from a g7?
€800 is still pretty crazy though. 6400 costs €250 more but the 6000 is €500 (all with lens)
Great video, but....
You are a little confused as to what White Balance means. I have seen you make the same erroneous statement in a previous video. White Balance refers to the color temperature of the image, not the brightness. So it controls how warm or cool the image is, not how bright or dark it is. Anyway- I really find high value in your content, so please do keep up the good work!
Hi Arthur, great videos I have followed your channel for a very long time, the quality is just getting better and better. Can I ask what hot shoe mount is that on the a6400?
Yes, here it is!: (on Sale with a 20% off coupon) so its $10.36 shipped! amzn.to/2qp147K
I already did my upgrade, a6000->a6400. I don't do video but love the AF upgrade with the new camera.
I was just in this boat, from being a longtime a6000 user (6 years or so) I finally upgraded and went with 6400 just for the video profiles and better body
Superb, don't know why RUclips stopped recommending your videos, but doesn't matter cause I will never forget this channel. Really helped in finaliseing the decision to buy 3xA6400(2 for photo with 1st one with Sigma 16 & 2nd one with 56mm & 3rd one for video) instead of 2xA6100(photo work) & 1xA6400(video work). Please suggest an good macro extension tube for Sigma 56 f/1.4, also currently I am confused between Sony's 18-105 f/4 vs 16-70 f4 for shooting wedding videos with A6400. Also a good gimbal for that, previously did finalise A6100, 16-70, Boya BY-MM1 & Feiyutech G6 plus for travelling & wedding video work. But since, using S-log will be beneficial for proper color grading now finalised A6400. G6+ has limit of 800gms, now increased weight demands another gimball. Does power zoom helps a lot in video work?
No planning on an upgrade from my a6000 anytime soon. Interesting to see what's the latest though.
1:27 it is a microphone input, not headphones
TenderDeer yeah I was really confused that the a6100 got headphone but not the a6400
Yeah, same...
3:56 sounds like you had the a6100 set to “Hi” (8 fps) and not on “Hi+” (11 fps).
That's what I was going to mention
Dear Sony: Give me an a6600 + an upgraded sensor + 4k60fps + 10bit and I'll give you $1,500 + tax.
Thanks,
Internet
P.S. An improved IBIS would be great too.
RageCage1701 Sony: For all that, it’s gonna cost you $2,000 and this will be our base price on a6700 rolling out September this year.
Why Me even the a7iii doesn’t have 4K 60
RageCage1701 hahahaha. Sony will def roll out 4K60 on their full frames first, and then apsc at some point. And what you ask for will probably be 2000-2500 which at that point might as well go full frame
@@maxwell5428 full frame cameras are too heavy. get used to old saggy ttita
@Don Mega what?
You probably have the electronic front curtain shutter turned on which makes it sound slower as it only flaps once. If it's turned off, it flaps twice making it sound faster.
I agree, the a6100 should be $699 at the most.
They go on sale. I got mine with a lens, $745 with tax.
People speak of 150 of 'not a lot'. Well, to some it is and if you use the 6100 for photography you'll get the same results as the 6400 and You've saved enough to treat 'She who must be obeyed' to a little something.
I have the a6500 and I love it. I don't think I have to upgrade any time soon although I would love a flip-over screen, that can be very useful. Great video, Arthur.
Thats what I like about your videos, honest reviews. Thanks for this review, I’m a 6000 user and i want to get a newer camera, now i know that i can put out of the list the 6100.
Nice job, keep to great content coming . I own the a6300 so have no plans to upgrade 😊 Are you planning to do a review on the new Sony 70-350mm aps-c lens?
Finally someone is pointing this out. I watched many reviews but none ended with this no-brainer verdict. In Germany the price difference is currently 80€.
I just got the a6100 because I got it for 589. I already have an A7iii so I’m using this for vlogging only pretty much. The difference was 300 dollars so for me it was worth it. I won’t be using the viewfinder much but really needed that flip screen and mic input. Totally agree if the difference was 150 dollars but found this on sale and jumped on it. Great videos man! Also have my original silver a6000 and another white a6000 modified for IR. 😆. Love Sony cameras!!
I think of all of the cameras in the a6xxx series the a6100 is the best value for photographers. For video it's the a6400. There are folks for whom the $150 difference can be a make or break decision.
Bought the a6400 a month ago and COULD NOT BE HAPPIER. Had the a6500 and hated it. The a6000 was amazing for the $, but happiness settled on the a64.
Really enjoying your videos and this one is valuable for me since I'm still looking to buy into the Sony A6xxx series. Food for thought.
The difference in price is around $300 not $150 based off your affiliate links. I'm looking to get into this format, with stock lens its a considerable difference
Thanks for your honest take on the 6100. I enjoy your way of presenting the information.
Nice review! What were you filming on? And did you use a gimbal? I love the smooth sideways movement on the sidewalk. Great stuff as always!
I still use A6000 with lens 18-105, Auto-Focus dan burst speed is amazing.
I've got the A6000 and was thinking of upgrading when they brought out the A6400, once I'd become immune to the cost of it here in Oz. Now there's another one in the lineup to consider. I wish Sony would name their increasingly better models in ascending order so I could keep track of what level to go for. :)
Sony are trying to do that. It looks like they are going to produce the a5100 and a6000 forever, but stop the a6300. The only confusing is between a6400 and a6500. I prefere my a6500 because of the IBIS and a better grip. I take pictures of landscape and architecture and not of people, cats and dogs.
I'm still shooting with the a6000. Been thinking of upgrading to a6600 or 2nd hand a6500 (much lower price) mainly to get the IBIS, better AF, bigger buffer, better EVF and bit better body. I may just wait until they upgrade the sensor. In the meantime I have just bought on good sale price the new Sony E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS which in my mind seems a better investment as I've decided I'm not going to go to a full frame system in the future.
wow i really needed this video. I have struggled to make a decision between the 6300 the 6100 and the 6400 and this ultimately changed my mind. ty
Really great breakdown of the differences between these two camera, I hadn't heard some of these things mentioned anywhere else. It wouldn't have influenced any sort of buying decision for me, because I bought an a6400 before they even announced the a6100, but I occasionally wondered if I had just waited a few months whether I could have gotten everything I cared about and saved a little money. Seeing this has definitely put those thoughts to rest.
@Don Mega Having upgraded from an a6000 to an a6400, I have to say I would still take the 6400 even at a considerable price difference. So many small improvements, but the biggest one being that I was never really happy with the low-light performance of the a6000. High ISO images just didn't look good. I was much happier with the images I get from the 6400 even at higher ISO, and being happier with the output is worth the extra cost to me.
I always appreciate all these electronic reviews, but as with most electronics it’s always a numbers game. If you save $200 you can buy the next level camera. But if you save $500 you can get the next next size up. If you throw even more money, you can potentionally shoot the next Avengers’ film. Lol Getting good gear is important, but sometimes we forget to create. You have to remember that a lot of the tools released now eventually become obsolete a few years later.
I appreciate this video in particular because I learned a few more things that I didn’t know before between these two alphas. But it just convinced me more about getting the 6100 as a starting camera, specifically because I’m going to be working indoors with a more controlled setting.
Still, this was a great video. Thank you!
Will there be any Video quality difference b/w sony a6400 vs a6600. Like dynamic range or sharpness??
After watching this video, i am absolutely clear about the differences between the two. Thank u so much, you are making awesome content man, keep going!
Upgraded from A6000 to A6600 yesterday! I was wondering if you're planning on reviewing it soon? And the 70-350mm G OSS
Great video. I am going to upgrade my a6000 mostly for the auto focus. I don't do any video but may in the future. I was going to go with the 6100 but pretty much came down to all the things you pointed out. Also I believe the 6600 and the 6400 have upgraded shutters that are supposed to last much longer. Another thing is if you are really tight with money the 6400 is available used for a decent price right now.
I don't understand how it can be a 150 dollar difference in the states, but a 400 dollar difference in Canada, unless the price has dropped for the 6100 that much in this past year....
I’m upgrading my a6000 to the a6600 and can’t wait for it to arrive! Any tips for setting it set up and digging through the mountains of settings for video? I never got into video with the a6000 but it’s my primary purpose for the a6600
I don't mess with a bunch of settings. Honestly I think I change about 5 things and thats it. If there is interest I could post up a vid.
How can you determine the speed of the shutter from the sound? If they both are 11 fps, that is their speed. Your perception of speed judging by the sound is ridiculous.
Otherwise a really good video 👍
I am upgrading from an a6000 to a6400. I shoot mostly video and even though i'd love the a6600 i can't seem to justify the price premium for the bigger battery.
I regret buying the A6400 about 1 year ago. Today i would buy the A6600 only because of the missing IBIS in the A6400. I use mostly the sigma prime lenses and the sony FE 50mm1.8 (fullframe lens) and none of them has OSS at all, that is a real bummer. I know the IBIS from the A6600 isnt the best in the world, but better than nothing. With the A6400 and lenses without OSS, videos are horribly shaky. And no, i dont want to carry a gimbal around all the time.
feel you man,,, I sold a6000 a6300 & a6400 in order to buy a6600, best decision, it's especially good if you have or planning to have full frame in future 💪
this video is very helpful. keep doing this kind of comparison video. thank you bro!
Coming from full frame Nikon D750, bought an a6000. Took me months to like it. Noise is terrible. Recently bought an a6400. Noise is better but I needed a new program to convert RAW files which I didn’t have to do with the a6000. Its many more steps now. Not the worst but worth noting. I adapt my a6400 with a Commlite Enf-e1 I believe it is to my Nikon glass and I’m finally happy I can do so successfully. My wish is that Sony sneaks a full frame sensor in one of these crop bodies for a super small package. THAT would be awesome.
I have a a5100 you better BELIEVE I'm upgrading to the a6600! Love your Videos! Keep up the good work!
That's a step UP!
Love how you do reviews. Makes me wanna watch the whole video!!
I still don't see anywhere if upgrading from a6000 to a6400 worth it for still photography. Do you have an advice ?
Jumping from a Canon to a Sony A6400... thanks for supporting that camera, for the price it's a good place to start. )))
hows the jump going?
I got the 6100 and I love it !
6400 and 6100 is a minor difference. Almost the same thing other than the picture profile which I don’t use.. and the few other small differences you mentioned the 6100 is a amazing camera and I think it will do awesome
I have two of the sigma primes but got the 6100 with kit lens last week
for 750$
Can’t beat that price .
I’m sure it’s a holiday sale , not sure if it will go back up but I felt that was great price 750$ vs a 1050$ right now for the same sale on the 6400.
I feel it’s well worth that price
I had the 6000 for a few years and I enjoyed it as well but the 6100 does offer a lot more and thankful for the headphone jack for sure !
Enjoy your videos Arthur !!!
Thanks
I agree - now A6100 is 648 USD, A6400 898 both body only. Issue I have with the A6100 is the slow shutter speeds it picks in P and A modes with auto ISO, but apart from that, I am very happy
stefano giovannini
Yes it’s great !!
I love it
They all a few issues if you want to look at it all ..
The 6100 is solid and great at 749$ with a kit lens can’t beat it !
Great comparison Arthur! I have the A6400 and love it!
Excellent review! Quick question: Now that the price difference is $300, what camera do you recommend?
My video needs are well served by a variety of cameras .. a5100's, hx90v and an Osmo Pocket. I have decided to add an a6400 to the mix because of new work demands. They are showing up used here in Saigon for about $750 with a kit lens. Hard to turn that down. i didn't even consider the a6100 because there is not a big advantage over my a5100s. One lives on a gimbal, and another is used on tripod or monopod. I also have a spare one. With flip screen and touch focus, the little a5100s are hard to give up. Up until now, I've been investing mostly in audio gear and lighting.
I've been waiting for your comments for about 6 weeks (since the announcement), so now I know. Going with the A6400. Thanks man. Have a great day.
Craig Hollabaugh I bought the a6400 2 Months ago, no regrets
A6400 is great camera .i enjoy mine with 500mm and 85mm sonys lenses
@@nicko1657 thanks for recommendation
@@pierrenj79 thanks for the recommendation
The a6400 is right!!!! 🌴😁👍
Thank you for the information. Now I am sure to buy the 6400, its a better option than the 6100. I have a 6000 and i love all your videos about that camera.
Arthur, your info is timely and helpful. Bought A6000 when it came out and I want to upgrade. Had been considering A7iii, but now leaning more towards 6400 or 6600. I'm sort of an intermediate photographer. For a future video, I'd love to see tips for particular conditions, especially astro/night shots. Keep up the great work.
Hey Arthur, I have had the A6000 now for 2 yrs. I have done too much photographic but now I am wondering if I should trade up. If you recommend that I do, should I choose, the A6100, A6400 or A6500? Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks
Been using Canon 70D and I do mostly photos at low light and gloomy weather conditions.
Planning to switch to sony along with the sigma 16mm 1.4 lens. Should I be worried about the battery life in A6000 for photos only?
or
Should I consider the A6100 given the budget is close to $1000.
9:07 - that color grade! haha. Joking aside, very informative comparison. Thank you for posting!
just bought the a6100, will update soon about my experience
@@starnight930 sorry I forgot about this . So I got it and went a few times for shooting , I don't post to much photos but I have and Instagram were you can see some of the photos I took with it , it's @diogoconceicaoph
Also as far as I can tell its very good for its price and either in video or photo is very good, the auto focus is amazing
Excellent Review. Thanks . Now the Sony A6100 dropped in price by $150 more. So it’s $598 for 6100 & $898 for 6400. Is $300 difference worth it now? I’m using my Sony A7iii as my main camera . I’m looking for 2nd camera for gimbal work for my events work . Thanks in advance .
I'm a relatively new live streamer on YT and looking to move from Logitech to a camera. You made a good case for the 6400 and it is certainly on my short list. Thank you!
As usual, nice ,simple easily digested presentation.
I've had my a6000 for 2 years (almost 40k shutter count), this past week I've been considering upgrading to the a6600. I do a huge amount of scene/portrait shooting at night time/dark places with three fast primes (no OSS), IBIS will be a massive help. When there's no time to set up the tripod, I attempt handheld in burst mode and end up taking 100 shots of the same thing hoping 1 will be perfect. The native ISO is better but I don't know how much more it'll help in practicality. A lot of people I know shoot with a7 series but that's so much more money than I can justify for nonprofit fun, plus I'm thinking to stick with APSC for the well established cheaper/larger range of lens, and to stay a bit different from the crowd I guess. The new Sony 16-55 AF would be great, never used an AF/zoom lens yet.
What are the enhancements and, saddly in sony's case, downgrades they made to the 66000 in comparison to the 6400? I got a 6000, but after making a couple of bucks with it i'm planning to go for the 6400.
Upgrading from A6000, which one is best? 6100? 6400? or 6600?
a6600 of course, but a6100 is a fantastic choice too
Sony marketing did screw up the price of the A6100. It's just too close to the A6400 as you say. I just recently purchased the A6400 based on the advantages over the A6100.
I still love my A6300 and have zero reason to upgrade.
(2)
maybe a new lens...
(sigma trio)
The a6600 is extremely overpriced, damn Sony ain't getting my money this year !
😂🤣What about this year?
Now I am waiting for the a6400 vs. a6600.... thanks, great analysis!
I have never seen such a content crisp video. Thumps up.
Thanks this video really points out the differences and helped me make my choice
Now it is 650 vs 900 USD (A6100 vs A6400). it is almost 50% more. I was going to get A6400 but I got 2 A6100s. The main drawbacks are that there is no Auto ISO minimum shutter speed, and the A6100 chooses very slow shutter speeds (1/30. 1/60) in P and A mode rather than increasing the ISO to 800 or so. I compared to my old A6000 that instead tends to increase the ISO. Anyway I am amazed by the AF, it is so great. I shoot mostly portraits and lifestyle and that makes it framing and shooting so much better (love the eye AF improvement). Regarding picture profiles for video I can still lower contrast, saturation and use neutral color for video. EVF is not as good but I can live with it. A6400 is the best deal, but A6100 at 650 USD is pretty good. Many mirrorless at that price do not have an EVF. Main gripe is I can't really use P and A for street photography as the camera picks slow shutter speeds in Auto ISO (i have not seen a reviewer mention the issue, it would be great to push Sony to deal with the issue in a future FW update). Thank you for the breakdown. What do you think of the 250 dollar difference between the 2 cameras?
Went from a6000 to a6400 and I’m super happy. I believe the a6100 has a limited record time in video as the a6400 does not. Another reason to avoid the a6100.
I tested the A6100, and it does not have the 30 minute record limit, so that is a plus.
Arthur R that’s good to hear. Many other Vlogers are saying it does have a limit and even the B&H specs have it at the 29 min 59 sec for video.
I've already upgraded to a6400 from a6000. It's definitely worth it. I love the eye auto focus and flip up screen. I just need to get my hands on a gimbal.
ElliotsCreations
I upgraded also from a6000 to a6400 a few months ago. Best camera I ever had.
Last month I got the Weebill Lab 3 gimbal from Zhiyun Tech. I highly recommend it.
I bought the a6400 even though the Sony APS-C body is definitely not cheap and lacking in ergonomics, a6400 still is the the most reasonable choice among the 61/64/6600. Had the a6100 been priced $300 cheaper than the a6400 I would've bought the A6100 instead before knowing all the corners Sony had cut, now knowing the differences, I'd say the a6400 should be the minimum for an experienced shooter. P.S. I've been noticing this for a while that even though you're a casual shooter, the quality of your reviews is really good and is getting even better, with personal experiences not listed anywhere on specs.
You gotta change the title, the price has gone down by $100-150
Price difference on amazon canada is 400$
Check how much the price is now in August 2020......$750
Wind Storm fr
If a6600 had included 4,2,0 400Mbs 60p internal we would have been all over it. Waiting for the next one, and add USB-C. Got the Fuji XT3 instead for those reasons. But the bigger battery, flip screen, IBIS and multishoe -along with smaller size is still such an advantage over Fuji.This year was a missed opportunity for Sony to get our money.
The only problem of a6100 is price. Should have been sold at a6000 price +150$ at most
@@jomsies that way your business will go bankrupt soon
@Phil Jones65 but those "cut down" and "low-res EVF" complain is only ever mentioned by those who has access to the better (and much more expensive) device beforehand. Without such access, mainstream guys will buy it because they know (for now) that no matter how good a phone, a dedicated camera for mature photographer is still better than phone. They simply compare it to a6000 and if they can be assured that the AF is evolutionary, 150 to 200$ upgrade over a6000 should be still reasonable.
Foto4Max in my country, the price of A6100 with kit lens is the same with A6400 also with kit lens. Crazy!
Good points. Gonna update my wishlist.
Finally taking the plunge, A6400 on a good special today in my town so I’ve ordered it. Thanks for your many informative videos, they helped me to my decision. Cheer!
I won both cameras and I can't tell the difference between the view finders. I paid 300 less for the a6100. If the difference had been $150 only, I would have gotten a second a6400 for sure.
I’m upgrading from A300 to a mirrorless model. I was thinking 6100, hobbyist getting back to photography after raising children. I have a Tamron 70-200 2.8 A mount and a 50 1.7 prime I would use with mount adapter.