LUXURY FOR LESS?? -- 2024 Mazda CX-90 vs. 2023 Acura MDX: Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- What is "luxury" anyway?? Today, we're comparing the 2024 Mazda CX-90 vs. the 2023 Acura MDX! The new Mazda CX-90 Turbo S Premium Plus definitely blurs the lines between mainstream and luxury with a $62,000 price ($3,000 less than MDX), a beautifully-crafted cabin, and an amazing new inline-6 powertrain. So taking a direct aim at luxury rivals like Acura MDX Advance, which car does it better?? Go ahead: CLICK to find out :) Also, be sure to LIKE, SUBSCRIBE and tap the notification bell if you enjoyed this review -- it helps us more than you can imagine!
#mazdaCX90 #acuraMDX #carconfections
Also, follow us for shorter-form content on our other social media platforms!
TikTok: @carconfections
Instagram: car_confections
Website: www.carconfections.com
Merch: carconfections.creator-spring...
0:00 Intro
0:51 Pricing Comparison
1:43 Exterior Comparison
3:38 Interior Comparison
7:45 Rear Seats & Cargo Comparison
9:50 Test Drive & Impressions
16:28 Sound Level Reading (dB) Comparison
17:48 Which is Right for YOU?
© Car Confections, LLC 2023. All rights reserved.
“Sampling the Latest Automotive Delicacies!” 
Авто/Мото
Absolutely Mazda CX 90 no doubt 😍
It's all about the driving dynamics vs cost. Name plate isn't a concern for me vs the wife..she loves her Q5 but we need more room and this is closer in size to Q7 without the price tag. I just need to blind fold her as we pull into the dealership, tape all the Mazda emblems and let her drive it. Mazda for me all day long. Mazda did a great job and put a lil Zoom Zoom in this model.
Lol, good luck with convincing your wife. After 7 years of driving Q5, my wife doesn't want to hear of anything but Audi. I tried to point out to Acura, Lexus, BMW, and could not succeed in that. Maybe you will have better luck 😂
The Turbo Premium Plus with the detuned inline 6 Turbo is what competes with the MDX. Its $11k cheaper.
I was really interested in the Cx90 but the dealer marked up the $59000 MSRP to $73,000 while the Acura dealer discounted the $65,000 MSRP to $62,000. Needless to say I bought the Acura MDX and love it. And, I was a previous CX 9 owner.
Markups on the CX90 already? That’s kinda sad :( I hope that dealer goes out of business.
Just got it for MSRP on Monday and it was the 2nd one to hit the dealership. That sucks your dealership did that.
That Acura looks awesome and reviews so well. I wish they were sold in Australia
So sad… Mazda isn’t even a luxury car lol… Lexus and Acura are more comparable
@@Windsofchange2023 I drive a Lexus IS500 and we used to have a 2016 Acura MDX. My wife's new CX90 is way better than our MDX in almost every way and in many ways, much more luxurious than my Lexus. (HUD, better sound system, better seats ect) Don't understand why people still judge cars purely on the $50 badge it showcases in the front and rear.
I recognize Mazda as a premium brand and would take the CX-90 over the MDX. Seems like the MDX copied Audi on the doors
53k for a turbo 6-cyl is a steal in the 3-row category
Not for mainstream. Cost too much
@@rahimi4762does the turbo S look like any other mainstream offering. It offers tons more than anything in its class
@@rahimi4762 You want to pay for a badge?
@rahimi4762 the cx90 isn't directly competing with mainstream models. Do your research before hating on nothing.
Not for mainstream are you kidding me get your head out of the gutter a freaking rav 4 is in the 40’s 😂😂😂😂.
The styling on the MDX is way better than the CX-90.
Both brands make great cars. Mazda is no stranger to the luxury segment. The 929 was a full fledged luxury sedan in the 80s and 90s. The Millenia was a great car too. So I can definitely see Mazda competing in this segment.
Agreed! I truly loved my 1992 929! This CX-90 continues the luxury journey for Mazda! Can’t wait to drive one! ❤
The Millenia is what sold me on Mazda in 95. Drove from NYC to Atlanta to visit some friends and the ride felt like we floated there. Top notch quality interior well ahead of it's time. When it comes to reliability, Mazda is right behind Toyota\Lexus. All the experts have stated such and I agree. I buy nothing but Mazda's now. Before Mazda, I owned 3 Accords, which were very well built as well.
I like both! But I would prefer Mazda guys.
Well done. Both premium SUVs that are both worth considering for the market. Definitely like what Mazda is doing these days.
Nice review, but I must say on a personal preference I think the MDX has much better exterior styling, especially the rear exterior view.
I don't like the interior of the Mazda. The interior is better though. The MDX's interior looks cheap with it's glossy plastic.
Something about the Mazda interior just looks so much more upscale and timeless than the MDX. Both are lovely though. Great video!
Where? Milano leather vest than Napa, better sound system and AWD in the MDX
The Mazda looks like mainstream upscale. Even the plastic is cheaper grade. I’ve owned the previous CX90 and own Acuras and Volvos
@rahimi4762 clearly everyone cares lol
The cx90 build quality is leaps and bounds better than the mdx and this is coming from a acura fanboy.
The interior looks very cluttered on the mdx and the piano black is too much
The MDX has a timing belt vs a timing chain in the CX90. I'll take the CX90 thank you!
Also the antique Honda engines been over 20 plus years with new revision revision and revision. Not innovative at all.
Mazda CX-90 for me because of the touchscreen infotainment system and stick shift. Not to mention, more horsepower for cheaper
bro, its barely touchscreen, and its an electronic shifter
@@shaanp_2260 it's a touchscreen where it needs to be a touchscreen tho as most peeps will be using Android Auto or Carplay.
There’s a setting to turn on the touchscreen for the entire system on the CX-90.
I love you two...very professional and work well together as a team. I love how you two appeared at the end of the video side by side. You should make that standard on all your videos.
Thanks! It was something new we were trying and I think we will stick with it!
@@CarConfections it woks because you are engaging head on with your subscribers. I would make it standard on all your videos…it’s makes you more approachable which is a great thing for us subscribers. You two are one of my favorite duos .
The CX-90 is impressing me more and more with each review. One gripe I have is the minivan look at the rear. I also wish more manufacturers would offer a bench seat option on their top trims. Time will tell how well the new engine holds up, but so far it looks like that straight six is punching well above its weight. I wonder how it will fare in a drag race against the Type-S considering it was pretty well matched against the X5 40i and the GLE 450 (both with I-6's).
It is not straight six but inline six.
@@rogerfebranjen Straight six and inline six are the same thing
@@nerbur Copy. Thanks.
@@rogerfebranjen I see you do not know what you are talking about.
Yes. Except for Mazda, when repair bills come, they will be extremely high because you have to drop the engine if you wanna do any minor work. Wanna replace the coolant pump? Drop the engine. Also I'm not sure why they went to such great length to make it complex without gaining anythingn
Great side by side comparison guys! I’ll take the CX-90 based on performance, MPG, looks and price. However, I think Mazda should consider upgrading their basic warranty to 4 yrs/50k which is standard in the luxury category.
They won’t lol 😂
Thanks, Jim!
What performance mdx outperforms mazda
@@igorge did we watch different videos? Mazda's power train performance outperforms MDX for 6k less.
We purchased a warranty up to 125K from the dealership with our CX-9
Great video comparison of the 2 models and thanks for sharing. My new CX90 Turbo S Premium Plus is in now in my parking space and I’m so impressed with the quality of the vehicle. Rhodium White with quilted white Napa Leather looks amazing and the driving experience is all Mazda on steroids.
I would definitely go for the Cx90 starting to live it more and more
What I like most about Mazda is the simplicity. The interior and exterior are beautiful and not so busy. I have a 2023 Mazda CX-5 Premium and absolutely love it. The driving experience was far better than any other vehicle I test drove.
CX-90. No doubt!
I'm afraid my bias comes into play as I have a 2020 MDX Advanced hybrid SUV I love this car it is perfect in every way for my liking. This SUV will last for many years to come, long term reliability is very important to me, and in the end resale value with the MDX will be the best one resulting is a lower cost per mile and overall operating cost.
I get 6.5l per 100km in my cx90 my mdx was 12l per that's where the saving is
Great comparison! Also I wonder, is CX-90 is such an fuel efficient on paper or you guys got that results after testing this vehicle? Also it is interesting to compare it to MDX TYPE as it has improved suspention and more power. Also it would be great to see this comparison side by side ( o-60 ), breaking, night light effectiveness, real fuel efficiency during testing and so on
I get 6.5l per 100km in mhev
My personal opinion, the 3.3 regular Turbo (non "S"), still has more torque and only 11 less HP. The Premium Plus trim of this "de-tuned" version offers a very similar and favorable comparison to the MDX Advance, at around $56k. So the value proposition is even greater. 2 years ago, I test drove the new MDX. I previously owned a 2013. The MDX just didn't "feel" good to me. The interior was ok but so busy with too many plasticky controls and piano black accents. I felt like I was in a video game console. I then drove a Mazda CX-9. Even with the 2.5 liter turbo 4, it puts out 320 lb-ft of torque and drives so much better than the MDX. It was night and day for me. The Mazda interior can be described as simply elegant. It feels premium without any of the tackiness I see in some of the luxury brands. The fact that the Grand Touring CX-9 was $45k, compared to the MDX tech package at $58k, and the decision was a no brainer to me. When I am finished with my CX-9, I will go straight to a new CX-90. But everyone has their own opinion, and that is perfectly fine.
We got the non-s as we weren't planning on putting premium gas. It's got good power IMO.
My choice would be the top trim inline-6 (MHEV) CX-90 (Signature, here in Canada) with the Artisan Red Metallic exterior and Windsor Tan Nappa Leather interior ($200 extra, here in Canada) which will provide the 2-tone steering wheel.
Did you get a quote on the CX-90?
F.G. The Mazda you just described IS the Mazda I bought. Owned for 1 month and 800miles and very happy with my purchase, although it WAS expensive (U.S. msrp pf $61, 920 and "out the door" after tax ($4,500) and some warranty buy ins I was at $67,000, yikes!). Still I like looking at it, being in it, and I LOVE driving it! Best features, pano roof, Tan interior with 2-tone steering wheel, the comfort of 4 Captain chairs (all cooled!), and the inline6 and 8spd. Also, I did a 300mi road trip (1/2 a tank) and around town for the other half tank...got 29mpg....so it overperformed. On the hiway-only road trip portion, the onboard computer showed 30.5 mpg!
@@OtisSpringerpilot does your cx90 has any ambient door or front panel lighting.
@@OtisSpringerpilot how's the comfort? I hear it's a bit stiff. Been looking at a GV80 and MDX type-S as alternatives to a CX 90, but it IS at the top of my list for sheer value.
@@deniskhoroshilov8316 ...sorry, I didnt see your ques for about 4 months! But, yes, I have all the LED interior accent lighting, it is subtle but very luxurious looking at night on the inside. As the top-trim level (Turbo S Prem Plus) I have every option Mazda offers on this CX-90. But it comes at a steep price of $61,850 before tax.
Great job guys, the comparison I've been waiting for! I'd be happy with either, but might go with the Mazda for its performance, rwd, and interior. While i like the MDX's exterior styling, that console area and drive mode selector cannot be updated soon enough. imho. 🌞👍👍
Nice video! Mazda really killed it! Could you do a video on the 2023 mustang im trying to decide if i should get this or wait for 2024.
You didn’t give Acura points for sound and some other things. No points for SHAWD
They did
I'd still go with the MDX.
@@JackSmith-qi7dr no not really it’s light years ahead of a suspension system than the cx90
How’s does sound make a 4000 pound vehicle better??
A ton of respect for Honda/Acura. But Mazda has been crushing it and improving each year since uncoupling with Ford. And now, with this new CX-90 (which I would love to have), I think they deserve a huge ‘atta’boy’!
I'll take CX-90 any given day for its rear-wheel drive bias, inline 6 engine, double wishbone front suspension, fuel economy ...
MDX have a double wishbone in the front as well. And its SHAWD improves the handling a lot. Of course there are people complaining a front wheel biased car can never handle as good as a rear wheel biased car. But there exceptions. You have to test drive both to make sensible conclusions, dont you agree as well?
I would choose the CX-90 all day long. I much prefer the Mazda driving dynamics and the rear wheel drive-based platform must make it even better! Now, if a MDX Type-S were price-competitive, it might be a different story, but at a $15K-plus price differential, there’s no way I am taking that MDX Type-S!!!
Mdx type s advanced used can be had for about $60k. Would you go type S used (cpo) or cx90 turbo s premium?
@@aceofspades6667 - not sure about that choice!
@@dougmael which way would you lean ?
@@aceofspades6667 - probably slightly toward the Mazda CX-90 with the hybrid powertrain.
@@dougmael Your primary driving factor is price. Everything else is just exuses to justify your deicison. I test drove both and mdx handles as good if not better.
I own the 2022 MDX Advance and I love it! Super comfortable, powerful and great interior luxury!
Mazda teaching Acura how premium SUV must be!!!
I think they are both great options. I’m a bit biased as someone who has owned several Hondas/Acuras in the past, and currently owning a 23 MDX ASpec. Can’t go wrong with either, although I do think you get a lot of bang for the buck with the Mazda
Once the initial price of the CX90 stabilizes at the dealerships, it will be the better buy. Plus, made in Japan too!
Love your channel.
I currently have a 2020 Mazda CX-9 Signature, which I love and love driving. Prior to the Mazda I had a 2016 Acura MDX Advanced, which I was mostly lukewarm about. Very nice interior, great sound system, but the engine and transmission combination did not work very well. I would frequently have one to two second response delays when I punched the accelerator which, of course, can be very dangerous if you’re moving out into traffic. Also, the CarPlay interaction was spotty at best. You would be driving along and then all of the sudden the connection was lost. When I first complained about it, they all at the dealership could not help me. I kept asking and finally someone told me it was a known problem with that there was no solution. After the experience with the Acura, I am of the belief that Acura is not at the same level as Lexus and the German manufacturers. Acura to me, is a near luxury brand, which makes your comparo even more interesting. Of course, since Acura added the touchpad, that would make the car more of a dead on arrival for me.
Thank you!
I can attest to that from the MDX and TL. Both powertrains hampered by the mediocre transmission coupling causing this, almost manual trans-like lag, very annoying.
I think for the money, I would prefer the cx90 as it offers almost the same, more and better…
Lexus owner here I am going cx-90 given these two choices
I would EASILY take the top of the line CX-90 over the MDX Advance... any day of the week. This is coming from a guy with a 2023 Acura MDX Type S Advance in the garage.
I had a regular MDX as a loaner and it was slow and the brakes felt weak. The CX-90 bests it by some 55hp. Neither one has adaptive suspension so that aspect is a wash. The CX-90 offers more sportier handling which you only get in the MDX Type S. It's a no brainer.
Mazda is very impressive; however, Acura is a prestigious luxury brand not to mention super reliability.
@@richardmyles8237 Acura only exist in the USA how’s is Acura a top luxury brand when just two years ago the accord Al had a better interior than tlx and the pilot had a better interior than the mdx until there long recent over due update
@@curiosityredpill7030 LMFAO...ACURA exist in CANADA...brush up on your geography. I dont care about "before"...I am talking about NOW. MDZ is def better than the Pilot in every way.
@@curiosityredpill7030 Canada is a HUGE country ruclips.net/video/cD0NL6NHzpw/видео.html
@@richardmyles8237 super reliability please 😂 I’m a Acura owner don’t say I’m a hater.
My clear choice is the cx90 mazda has been doing a great job of giving value for money ,the mdx when matched against the Germans would be far better in terms of long term performance and reliability.
Just picked up the CX90 and traded in our Atlas. Except a couple of shortcomings, I'd say this car is near perfect. Way better than the Atlas. We had a 2016 MDX as well that had lots of issues as well.
Hi Jason - what are some of the shortcomings you've noticed?
@@kenns15 The Mazda app is very glitchy and slow so remote start is very spotty compared to our Atlas. The Atlas had remote start off the key fob so it was fool proof. There is no lock/unlock feature (easy access) on the doors for the back seat so you have to open the front seat to unlock the back seat (or dig in the pocket for the key fob). The passage between the two mid-row captain seats is very narrow. Luckily our 9 year old son is still small enough to crawl back there but it was tough when I tried. Lastly, spotty Apple car play if its not hard wire connected.
We were going to buy atlas and had picked one on a Friday Saturday we had breakfast and seen mazda dealer so we went for a walk.....and now own a cx90 lol
@@jeremyshand9187 Good job. Literally, my only two big complaints are no touch screen and not having easy keyless access in the rear doors. I admit, those two things are pretty annoying but aside from that, the car is super awesome.
I really like the CX90, but I am unable to spec the top model as a 7 passenger because Mazda replaced the middle bench with captains chairs. At least the MDX gives me the option of both with the removable center section… so it will have to MDX for me.
Canadian here and i have a 2010 mdx. It is a tough car to beat for winter driving conditions. The super handling awd is top notch.
Little over a month ago I purchased a MDX Advanced just like the one in the video. No complaints here and I got it well under sticker price.
How much under sticker price?
@@akhere07 with dealer fees and state taxes I was still under $5k of msrp.
@Andrew wow that's great... I didn't know otherwise u would have enquired that acura also.. I am getting hyundai palisade tomorrow
@@akhere07 yea it was hard not to pass up that deal. Wife was not interested in the Hyundai.
I've been a CX9 owner for 12 years - - best car ever. I'm not even close to being tired of it. You guys look good when you're sitting side by side in front of the camera. It works. Great review. We've all been waiting a long time for the CX90.
Took a Cx home today! Very impressed. First half tank gave us nearly thirty one mpg.
I'm All for MDX without question 😅❤......Or LEXUS
A lover of premium Toyota and Honda
Thanks for the video❤
We ended up choosing an Acura MDX for the better audio quality
I think the Mazda interior looks more premium. It's more powerful, more efficient and is probably the "driver's car" of the two. Mazda for me.
Part of everything you want and need is what speaks to your personal style. All seem to be good vehicles but for me the CX90 is too bubbly. I like the sharper lines of the MDX and that's a personal taste. Actually, I prefer the exterior look of the CX9 to the CX90 because of the front, there is a more sharply defined angular line. But you couldn't go wrong with any of these. For me, a small detail makes a difference. I was buying an SUV for my wife. She was content with the RDX, but I didn't like the rear lights. I told her i don't want her backside looking like that going down the street. So for me it was worth paying the difference in getting the MDX over something I didn't like...something as simple as the tail lights cost me near $20,000. But it was worth it
I’m not an suv fan but The mdx looks cooler, especially the type s. The cx90 is giving Buick!
@@Quinton0520 I agree with you...I am not much of a SUV fan either, but the mrs wanted something higher off the road for herself. And a happy wife is a happy life 😊
The CX-90 looks more “luxury” on the inside and outside than the Acura.
Just bought our CX-90 and absolutely love it. Some people complain about the price compared to Hyundai/Kia. I looked at all 3 in my market.... All Palisades I looked at would only sell at MSRP and Kia dealers were adding $2-5,000 on top of MSRP for Tellurides ("market adjustment" LOL - SEE YA KIA) Mazda CX-90 not only sold for $1500 under MSRP... on top of that you can get 0.9% or 1.9% financing from Mazda depending what trim you go with. If you weigh everything, especially if you are one of us 'common folk' who need to finance cars, you really can't beat the Mazda CX-90
Just purchased a cx90 last week. Previous owner to a Lexus and MDX and I’m so impressed with the cx90 this car and look forward to driving it everyday.
Give the new power train of the CX-90 a few years to prove itself and Mazda definitely needs to add adaptive suspension to be competitive. Nothing gets tired faster than a stiff riding entry level luxury family transporter. Driving dynamics become far less important. Other than that, major kudos to Mazda.
Cx90: COMFORT riding + DRIVING DYNAMICS!
Only BETTER, right!
Mazdas are so underrated! The fact that you are comparing it to an Acura is a testament to that. If you are shopping for a car or suv, definitely test drive a comparable Mazda.
Im going Mazda all the way. Despite them being similar in almost every category, i do like the powertrain setup of the Mazda better and then on top of that you have the option of 2 other engines if you dont like a certain engine choice. Not to mention you have the option of having FWD, AWD or RWD if i’m not mistaken. You get the best of all worlds. I do like how Mazda used a native cloth and wood in areas that’ll more likely catch dust. Thats something brands need to take note of ESPECIALLY AUDI. Gloss black isn’t a resolution to every part of the vehicle. The designs are pretty much equal imo though you can recognize the Mazdas sporty intentions.
The CX-90 is only offered in a RWD biased AWD setup. No FWD, nor RWD only.
Great review guys! I prefer the CX 9 in a dark blue. It is a solid value and has a more distinctive look.
Thats true and way cheaper than overpriced cx90
I really dont need the third row seating. I will wait and see what the Mazda 70 series looks like built on the same platform. That color on the Mazda is lit
Waiting to see the CX-70 same platform as the 90 without the 3rd row seating, as I understand it. Great comparisons, guy's
thanks
Me too
Waiting on the 70
As compared, my vote is Mazda. Why?
Inline 6, MPG, cost savings. If compared to MDX Type S: WAY more cost savings, less tech to "break," beautiful styling, more fun to drive. My choice will be made by a test drive and test of the Bose Centerpoint audio system. I could aftermarket beef up the audio for way less than the price difference. Oh, and mild hybrid. Great comparison guys!
Thanks!
Excellent review guys. Mazda is definitely kicking it! Great work guys
Thanks, Bob!
Two very solid vehicles. Just going to come down to which features you value most.
WOW! Never seen your channel before. Very impressive review
Thank you! Welcome aboard!
How much is price of lowest trim of mdx?
And feature trim that lowest trim of mdx compares with which trim of cx90?
Mazda CX90 by far! 🫶🏾
I look forward to the CX-70, because the 90 is really too big for me, but I have had an Acura RDX for 10 years so moving to Mazda can only come from a real difference between the 70 and RDX....such as a plug in hybrid.
The cx70 is going to be just as big as the cx90 unfortunately
@@vin2689ny I am reading and hearing different things from different sources. We shall see. Many say it will be a wider version of the CX-60
I'm in the same boat. There's no way cx70 will be as big as cx90, what's the point. And plus Mazda has done a nice job separating the sizes wit cx3,5,9. I'm hoping the cx70 will retain the powertrain of the cx90 with better dynamics, like an RX350 for "drivers". Can't wait....
Excellent review, my guys !!! Even though the MDX is nice, I will still take the CX90 any day of the week. She's a powerful Japanese beauty ❤👍🏼🔥💪🏽
Thank you!
Hands down cx90!!! Better value better features better drivetrain. Acura needs to go back to square one
Nope. SHAWD from the Acura
Acura also has the best seats in the class with Volvo. Milano leather is more upscale than Napa
Looks better and more practical
Mazda is very impressive; however, Acura is a prestigious luxury brand not to mention super reliability.
@@richardmyles8237 The exterior and interior of the Acura says otherwise; and how prestigious luxury can a Japanese brand be? Bentley or Rolls Royce level?
PHEV CX-90 would be my choice. Great video.
I’d definitely go with the Mazda CX90
Fantastic comparison!😸
Gents, your side by side comparison is one of the BEST I've seen. Detailed. Concise. Fair. Next time include the actual gas mileage advantage. Mazda for me. I've had 3 BMWs, and love the "tight" road feel (but BMW electronics and pricing are a fatal thumbs down by comparison). Have 2 Mazdas in the family and they are reliably bullet-proof; one with well over 250k miles. MDX interior is far too 'cluttered" and needs a major upgrade to compete with luxury trend toward "clean line elegance" w/o piano gloss. Mazda kicked it out of the park in this design category. Both mfgs produce quality vehicles. But Mazda has now pulled ahead IMO.
Thanks, Michael! Glad you enjoyed
These prices are out of control.
Acura MDX is tested for reliability Infact I have a 2007 MDX and still running pretty good..
Hi! How competant is the new CX90's lane centering? Does it work independantly whether the adaptive cruise is on or off? Thanks!
JMM....I can answer your ques. I own a Turbo S PP. Love it so far. Yes, the lane centering is active even without using cruise control. It surprised me at first, since I do NOT like anyone or anything moving my wheel while I am driving! But, it is mild initially, it flashes a yellow bar on the dash and in the heads up display. It definitely DOESNT try to drive you back to center, it just interrupts a "continued drift" if it activates. Also: it wont activate if your blinker is on or, if the blinker is used while active, it will deactivate. Also, I believe you can disable the entire feature with a button on the lower left side of the dash...thats my preference.
@Otis Springerpilot wow that's great news about Acura's lane centering! I really like when systems allow the lane centering to be ON even without adaptive cruise on. I find it useful on long distance freeway driving!
I take the Cx-90 anytime 😂
Not as reliable as honda/acura
This means he does not own any of them .
For me I'm way more interested in the CX70 (coming soon) vs. RDX vs GV70. Acura has SH-AWD which is superior to anything that Mazda or Genesis has. The GV70 will have it on outright looks and interior quality. Mazda likely will take the dub on value.
A great feature I found in this recent winter was that remote engine start also heats your cabin and defrost your windows if it’s lower than a certain temperature inside. Will not buy a mother car without this feature ever again.
We own an 22 CX-9 we bought brand new and we love it!!!! A bigger more powerful version would be great to have!!!! I also am a huge fan of the MDX!
Wow rear wheel drive
How about used mdx type s w advanced vs cx90 turbo S premium ?
CX 90 with rear wheel drive with inline 6 turbo has better driving dynamics than MDX. CX 90 for the win. Personally I will wait for CX-70 with same set up and shorter :-)
The fact that the Acura has a true 2nd row for 3 and the cargo volume is comparable, I’d go with the MDX. Not to mention the tech, warranty, predicted resale, reliability, and cost of ownership all favor the Acura, it just makes more of a case for most shoppers.
The Mazda is in a class by itself.
@8:42 you give the 0.5 point to MDX for the (greatly appreciated by me) removeable center seating position in the 2nd row. What you didn't mention is that if you remove it, the captains chairs don't have armrests in the inboard position. Admittedly it would be a design challenge to add them, but it could be done. So I guess I would not have awarded MDX anything here although I *LOVE* the option!!!
I agree with you. I'm not thrilled that the only way to get center console in second row with CX90 is in the very top trim level ...and like you said , it isn't removable ! Hoping they will reconsider this in future years ! Saw a cx90 on the highway last night and it looked sweet !
i believe infotainment system points should go to CX-90
1. for ease of use. it is just so much easier to use the knob compare to mdx's track pad
2. maps utilize full screen on cx-90 (AC and AA) or split screen in AA while mdx has a big portion of the screen dedicated to built in apps which is useless.
Love your db level testing. I'll take smooth and quiet every time. What other SUV's in this category rank high in the ride quality and quietness dept.? I'm not interested in American made. Thanks
Thanks! BMW X5/X7 are the quietest of the luxury SUVs we've ever tested. We are working on adding sound level readings to our website www.carconfections.com for people to view and compare all models by segment
only advantage of the acura is its badge prestige and els audio system, mazda is the winner everywhere else. some models of the mdx don't even come with a spare tire☹
The MDX is overpriced for what it is (FWD Minivan platform) and I feel like Honda/Acura have really been mailing it in lately (see the new Pilot and styling on the new Accord). Mazda all the way in this case. The CX-90 is strikingly good looking at I LOVE Inline-6 engines.
I’ll take the Mazda CX90 for several reasons that are probably subjective reasons. In person the Mazda has far better block appeal. Secondly, the brake pedal feel far exceeds the Acura. I wish Mazda would have used more sound insulation as well as a better wireless charging pad. I would have rated the Mazda with a Perfect 10 had the sound insulation been better and the wireless charging pad been better. We are a phone crazed society, so Mazda really dropped the ball in the wireless charging area.
Just picked up my new CX-90 Turbo S Premium (not Plus) today. Got it for 55k in Artisan Red w white interior. Beautiful!! Yes, the MDX felt a little smoother and quieter in ride but not significantly enough. The Mazda handling and acceleration is a total pleasure. The Mazda’s infotainment dial and buttons beats the MDX’s touchpad hands-down. Really looking forward to some road trips along with daily driving.
Congrats on your new CX-90!
Mazda has ample headroom and legroom -- as a taller person, the MDX glaring lack of headroom is a dealbreaker...front seat headroom and legroom is arguably more important than many of the other comparisons To ignore the significant difference in headroom as part of the interior comparison is understandable given the relative size of the analyst(s) - however, if you are a taller person, the CX() is a no brainer.
Guys just remember one thing:
Mazda doesnt even have a performance trim for the CX90 yet
Imagine if they put out a version of the CX90 with bigger turbos, an engine tune, sport exhaust, adaptive suspension and brembo brakes
It has GT-P Trim for performance lovers!! I hope you will love that
why would they do that to a 7 seat school bus
@@samfreeman9382
Why did Honda do it? Maybe because Dad doesn’t want to drive a school bus. Go for it Mazda!
Nice thorough comparison. The road noise is a pretty big factor for me. Were it not for that, I’d say the Mazda all day.
Thank you!
After taxes and dealer rake. If you have the $70k for either car. Either would be great. But I think the Mazda has fresher styling.
I like the Acura MDX but probably thinking about changing my MDX to be Mazda CX-90 you because it has more luxury I mean not saying that the Acura MDX doesn't have any luxury but Mazda is on a whole new level
I took an Uber in the previous generation of Honda Pilot and I noticed the same thing about the rear legroom, where you basically have to twist your feet sideways. It was awful!
I will tell you one thing though... It would really be awesome to find a new redesign for the smaller RDX soon, since it ticks so much of the right buttons, and they probably will have fixed a lot of customer complaints, by then, to create a real world-beater in the compact SUV segment. Too bad the MDX will probably take at least another 2 to 3 years for a complete redesign
They just redesigned the mdx
Double Acura owner here. Acura does the bare minimum just to be considered an entry-level premium (from my experience). Transmission delay is plain awful. Not in the same ballpark as Lexus, BMW, or MB. So this comparison is quite accurate. Having said that, the 2024 MDX is great in a straight line, but it wobbles on turns. And that hood (2024) is sooo long, why? Mazda's rear-based delivery is more a driver's car so handling goes to cx90. The only unknown is the reliability. Curious what the cx70 will bring. Needles to say a great comp.
Mazda is definitely premium, but it has a ways to go before it can be considered "luxury"
You should do a comparison between the cx90 and the lexus rx350h to see if its worth the extra $10k more on the lexus