@@markieffmorris9263 first of all it's not an analysis. It's a fact. Most of the time people just want to go home. They're not robots they're just humans. And we all know how humans are lol. 😅 And my name has nothing to do with Nas trust me. I just like the word. 👌👌😁
@@illmatixx_5346 a fact that does not matter, the fact that he lied about being at the kennel is evidence of his lies, the fact that he said he was shot on the roadside shows his lies, he killed them.
Harpoop-lian will continue appealing and filing bullshit. It's what he does. Let's be clear here, I think the clerk was inappropriate and celebrity obsessed. The jury However, regardless of the clerk's wrongs, came to the ONLY conclusion possible. If there were another trial and another jury , Harpoop-lian would just start whining that there's no way to get an untainted jury at this point. HE is the one who KEEPS it in the public eye. He went to the jury members questioning and pressing until one juror said what he wanted to hear.
Justice Toal is impressive. She owned that courtroom. It was messy but she cut through the nonsense and made a good decision. Hats off to Justice Toal.
Thank you for not wasting tax payer resources on this waste of oxygen. Appellate court better uphold this ruling and that foolish, greedy Clerk better never ever profit off a paragraph, let alone a book on this trial.
The evidence was overwhelming. I will never understand why he killed Maggie, but I know that Paul was costing AM money. With a man so willing to do anything for money, murder wasn't a stretch.
A “Motion for a New Trial” was going to be necessary before an appeal of this could be filed, and the State would have appealed her decision had she granted the motion. Bye Alec.😅
This judge is amazing. Her dedication in reading the trial transcripts and her ability to see through Becky Hill’s testimony is admirable. She reached the only conclusion possible.
Just know we all don't play by the same rules. If you get found guilty of something and you try to appeal trust me it's either going 2 B YEARS or NO period... But If the D.A. loses and you get found not guilty though they can RE Try you like within a month LOL...imagine🤦🤦😅😅👌
I have not been watching the appeal until today...Ms. Hill was not a credible witness or person...I , by only hearing her answers to the Judges questions...led me to believe that what she did admit to saying and even what she did not admit to saying...was more of a rendition of being adament about some things and not quite remembering of other things... Only when the Judge pushed her to admit, and rightly so, that ... as the Judge stated that the Juror knew about the Fb post from the assumption of the post being from the Jurors Ex- Husband , which proved to not be from the Ex-Husband..which should not weigh in on anything....the Juror stated that she did not know about the post until " Ms Becky, " told her about it on their way to seeing the Judge in Her Chambers... And The Judge was adamant about that was the way it happened...Becky Hill admitted to that being correct...finally... Or, at least that was the way I understood the questioning and answers between Ms. Hill and the Judge. The fact that only one of the jurors admitted to Ms. Hill's words gestures etc... that led her... to believe Mr. Murdaugh was guilty... As far as the others, Jurors were concerned...Why would they even want to admit or even at the length of time that had passed after the original trial... know that their verdict of guilty was of their own mind ... and was not associated with... a comment... or... the way it was said... or... eye contact on the Mozell visit...actually came into play ...as the jurors, WHO made eye contact with Ms. Hill at Mozell were actually... influenced by that, " Eye Contact, " and added in with other things ...as in... " Pay Attention, it is an important day." Which Ms. Hill admitted to saying but stated it did not mean anything concerning Mr. Murdaugh directly ...but just Pay attention, in general...WHEN she said it... BUT...HOW was it heard by each Juror at the time Ms Hill said it.. Which...it is not necessarily WHAT is said but HOW it IS said? UNDER most circumstances, to begin with... in most conversations ...it is the perception of the person hearing it ...CAN make a BIG DIFFERENCE. It was a fine line...to walk, but Ms.Hill was not credible.. The bottom line was and is.. What WAS said? HOW was it said? AND...HOW was it interpreted ....by each individual ( Juror) who HEARD IT? COMMUNICATION...should never have been on a " Friend- like," bases at any time under the circumstances...Eye Contact should NOT have been made... It seems like the relationship of Ms. Hill and the Jurors...should have been understood that it was a very STRICT and Structured bases at all times...Respect for one anothers duties should have been AS IN... walking a tightrope. Under the circumstances of a murder trial. I would have called for a mistrial...a new trial...should have been granted...but that is just my opinion...and my opinion does not have the merit that this Judge has... The length of time that it would take to have a new trial... Should not have come into play, either... Just making that point on my own thinking... Is Mr.Murdough guilty... I think so...but there were questions at the original trial...that were not answered... But the Gentleman that gave the closing arguments, I can not recall his name, not Mr. Waters, who was excellent but the final State's Attorney was spot on in everything he said and did...I was not surprised that it was a very short deliberation finding M. guilty... AND...I think Mr. Murdough's Lawyer did a great job questioning Ms. Hill. As did the JUDGE did a great job...
I don't think that clerk of court will ever work again. How shameful to end your career that way. Also, I feel she may be looking at lawsuit(s) coming her way.
Can’t believe this lady made a book out of a very sensitive and emotional case! And i can’t believe AM is still the only one that believes he didn’t kill his wife and son!!
I like this Judge, thought she was fair. Hill didnt get away entirely unscathered, she made comments and the judge called her out on it. I believe AM is guilty and decision of no new trial is the correct one.
Its all ao confusing, so she did tamper with the jurors but they dont care. And not that i care but they called the judge ma'am and sir? Was their confusion there?
In 'Tangled Vines', bestselling true crime author John Glatt reconstructs the rise of the prestigious Murdaugh family and the shocking double murder that led to the downfall of its patriarch, Alex Murdaugh.
He has the same eyes as Jodi Arias. Those are the eyes of a killer whose soul has been peeled out behind those same eyes. That's why they look so schizophrenic and empty. It's like you look into the eyes of a dead person. They are not dead. But their soul is dead. 12:18
Is that a man or a woman? In all honesty, I can't decide. I personally think Alec is innocent of the murders. But guilty of all the financial crimes. F that clerk of courts!
From the start the Judge has seemed to be so hostile against Murdaugh. It's unusual to give a new trial unless the other side consents. But this Judge's dislike for Murdaugh is evident.
@@emjaydark2811 the most unbiased Judge was Ted Bundy's judge in Florida and Oscar Pistorius's judge in So Africa ... they both convicted but not a speck of bias, if they disliked the defendants (Bundy or Pistorius), they hid it well. that's how a Court should be!
@@UFCtrumpsboxing I imagine one would form an opinion as the facts rolled out, but I think any judge should avoid the appearance of bias. When the first judge, Neuman read his scolding, humiliating, excoriation of Murdaugh at the first trial, I really lost respect for him as a judge and actually as a person. It seemed cruel and unnecessary to kick a man when he had just been locked up away forever.
Saw nothing wrong with the judges closing statements before sentencing of Alex after all, he had been convicted and we all must accept the jury's decision. The judge therefore has a right to address him according to his new status of being a convicted double murderer. @@emjaydark2811
Harpootlian isn't done yet. He'll get it overturned. The judge tipped her hand that she was biased in her decision by her editorial comments at the end.
No she didn’t. What she stated is that she’s never seen a case this and that theirs conflicting standards as to how to go about it. She went by the South Carolina standard but said that some federal courts use a different.
let them waste more time and take more of AMs money. he will not be found innocent. As the judge said the evidence was overwhelming and the verdict was not a surprise.
Remember that she is now the trial judge. Her comments regarding the weight of the evidence are completely appropriate given her role. She was agreeing with the comments by the first trial judge who made the same comment after the verdict.
They all know that the dirt's gonna come out. In the fact that murdoch's not guilty , it just goes to show how our justice system treats everybody guilty before proving innocent
So the jurors are lying and we just believe this lady who already lied and plagiarized. He's guilty but Gimme a break! How can you measure what was said by her at that time?? I think he most certainly should be granted new trial if the statements are true by jurors
@@Elegant_Sausage You can thank Beck Hill nobody else..Take the murders out of it for a sec and ask yourself if you would be satisfied with the results knowing and hearing everything that was said..I think Becky blinked a million times and did not sound believable at all. He's gonna get a new trial regardless just may take while longer
""""Retrial Denied ""; again truth with fact ...comes to the light....🙏🏽
Intelligent, fair and good Judge. May God bless you Mrs Judge Toal ❤
AMEN. You are a very very wise woman. Thank you, Judge.
Hell NO the naw naw. He is guilty as sin.
Guilty
You know you don't know that. There was really no evidence to convict him but sometimes the jury doesn't care. They just want to go home 👌👌😅😅
@@illmatixx_5346 I may not agree with you but thankfully your taste in music is better than your jury analysis
@@markieffmorris9263 first of all it's not an analysis. It's a fact.
Most of the time people just want to go home. They're not robots they're just humans. And we all know how humans are lol. 😅
And my name has nothing to do with Nas trust me. I just like the word. 👌👌😁
@@illmatixx_5346 a fact that does not matter, the fact that he lied about being at the kennel is evidence of his lies, the fact that he said he was shot on the roadside shows his lies, he killed them.
Harpootlian. Big reputation, but should have retired after the trial.
Too Right!
Jim Griffin is also uniquely bad at closing. The judge was holding eye contact because she wasn’t taking any notes 😂
He is so creepy 😢
Black as Smut eyes scares me
We were not their. We dont know all the facts. I am convinced he is innocent and was framd by a rogue prosecutor and out of control police.
@@chucksurgeonertribute2113 At this point you really have to be an idiot
Great judge, endorsing the jury🎉🎉🎉🎉
Justice again 😊
Harpoop-lian will continue appealing and filing bullshit. It's what he does. Let's be clear here, I think the clerk was inappropriate and celebrity obsessed. The jury However, regardless of the clerk's wrongs, came to the ONLY conclusion possible. If there were another trial and another jury , Harpoop-lian would just start whining that there's no way to get an untainted jury at this point. HE is the one who KEEPS it in the public eye. He went to the jury members questioning and pressing until one juror said what he wanted to hear.
good comment. the jury did their job and ruled on the case presented by lawyers not gossip presented by the clerk
100%
Thank you Judge!
What a great judge. Every single person should follow her example in integrity and professionalism.
The Judge got it right.
Justice Toal is impressive. She owned that courtroom. It was messy but she cut through the nonsense and made a good decision. Hats off to Justice Toal.
Thank you for not wasting tax payer resources on this waste of oxygen. Appellate court better uphold this ruling and that foolish, greedy Clerk better never ever profit off a paragraph, let alone a book on this trial.
She's no yoke !!! She threw the book at him and at Harput there lol !!
Thank you Excellent Judge Toal!
This guy is living it up inside, what else does he need?
Ha Ha Ha! He loses again and deserves to rot in prison....😂😂😂
Singing to the angels.. once again guilty as charged. The snurk on his face was stunning, he just wanted another day out. I can't stand him.
Give it up Big red ! Paul & Maggie , Mrs Satterwhite tons of many more people didn’t deserve the horror you caused !
"The court clerk was called by the siren of wanting celebrity status" fleeting,foolish comments, she let that clerk have it
Thank you judge!
Great job judge!!! You know your stuff and we appreciate you. It now time to celebrate!!
I thought we might see some more snot run out of Alex nose today! WTH
The evidence was overwhelming. I will never understand why he killed Maggie, but I know that Paul was costing AM money. With a man so willing to do anything for money, murder wasn't a stretch.
She was speaking to divorce lawyers 6 weeks before the murders.
This Judge is so Polished. She’s wonderful ❤
I like she doesn’t mince her words. 👍🏻
bye bye Alex.
Thank heaven.
A “Motion for a New Trial” was going to be necessary before an appeal of this could be filed, and the State would have appealed her decision had she granted the motion. Bye Alec.😅
GOOD!!!!
hahah his bribe failed.
don't forget Alex's voice on Buster's cell right before ...
You mean Paul
YEAH ! EVIDENCE OVERWHELMING.
Great decision indeed!
👏🏼 ... oops hang on🤔😟... thats not it?! More to come !?!..wth...
😊
Boy that poor judge sure can't speak
Back to jail. He was reaching at straws.
Is it just me or does he look a bit like a great value Nick Nolte
This judge is amazing. Her dedication in reading the trial transcripts and her ability to see through Becky Hill’s testimony is admirable. She reached the only conclusion possible.
Just know we all don't play by the same rules.
If you get found guilty of something and you try to appeal trust me it's either going 2 B YEARS or NO period...
But If the D.A. loses and you get found not guilty though they can
RE Try you like within a month LOL...imagine🤦🤦😅😅👌
I have not been watching the appeal until today...Ms. Hill was not a credible witness or person...I , by only hearing her answers to the Judges questions...led me to believe that what she did admit to saying and even what she did not admit to saying...was more of a rendition of being adament about some things and not quite remembering of other things...
Only when the Judge pushed her to admit, and rightly so, that ... as the Judge stated that the Juror knew about the Fb post from the assumption of the post being from the Jurors Ex- Husband , which proved to not be from the Ex-Husband..which should not weigh in on anything....the Juror stated that she did not know about the post until " Ms Becky, " told her about it on their way to seeing the Judge in Her Chambers...
And The Judge was adamant about that was the way it happened...Becky Hill admitted to that being correct...finally...
Or, at least that was the way I understood the questioning and answers between Ms. Hill and the Judge.
The fact that only one of the jurors admitted to Ms. Hill's words gestures etc... that led her... to believe Mr. Murdaugh was guilty...
As far as the others, Jurors were concerned...Why would they even want to admit or even at the length of time that had passed after the original trial... know that their verdict of guilty was of their own mind ... and was not associated with... a comment... or... the way it was said... or... eye contact on the Mozell visit...actually came into play ...as the jurors, WHO made eye contact with Ms. Hill at Mozell were actually... influenced by that,
" Eye Contact, " and added in with other things ...as in... " Pay Attention, it is an important day." Which Ms. Hill admitted to saying but stated it did not mean anything concerning Mr. Murdaugh directly ...but just Pay attention, in general...WHEN she said it... BUT...HOW was it heard by each Juror at the time Ms Hill said it..
Which...it is not necessarily WHAT is said but HOW it IS said?
UNDER most circumstances, to begin with... in most conversations ...it is the perception of the person hearing it ...CAN make a BIG DIFFERENCE.
It was a fine line...to walk, but Ms.Hill was not credible..
The bottom line was and is..
What WAS said?
HOW was it said?
AND...HOW was it interpreted ....by each individual ( Juror) who HEARD IT?
COMMUNICATION...should never have been on a
" Friend- like," bases at any time under the circumstances...Eye Contact should NOT have been made...
It seems like the relationship of Ms. Hill and the Jurors...should have been understood that it was a very STRICT and Structured bases at all times...Respect for one anothers duties should have been AS IN... walking a tightrope.
Under the circumstances of a murder trial.
I would have called for a mistrial...a new trial...should have been granted...but that is just my opinion...and my opinion does not have the merit that this Judge has...
The length of time that it would take to have a new trial... Should not have come into play, either...
Just making that point on my own thinking...
Is Mr.Murdough guilty... I think so...but there were questions at the original trial...that were not answered...
But the Gentleman that gave the closing arguments, I can not recall his name, not Mr. Waters, who was excellent but the final State's Attorney was spot on in everything he said and did...I was not surprised that it was a very short deliberation finding M. guilty...
AND...I think Mr. Murdough's Lawyer did a great job questioning Ms. Hill.
As did the JUDGE did a great job...
I don't think that clerk of court will ever work again. How shameful to end your career that way. Also, I feel she may be looking at lawsuit(s) coming her way.
the Clerk is a pro ... a pro liar
Yep I agree. She def a liar .... But he guilty as sin
@@jamiehoover9348same she's a liar but he's still a thief and murderer.
I could not believe he did not get a new trial. He should have! I would love to have to observe another trial and see him get convicted again.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
He is guilty. No more trials!
Can’t believe this lady made a book out of a very sensitive and emotional case! And i can’t believe AM is still the only one that believes he didn’t kill his wife and son!!
Very Intelligent Judge👍🏻
Way to go judge
Liar, liar, pants on fire...
Her book gives her sway. And the tone she intimates.
I like this Judge, thought she was fair. Hill didnt get away entirely unscathered, she made comments and the judge called her out on it. I believe AM is guilty and decision of no new trial is the correct one.
He'll no
This judge is totally pissed. Dont blame her. That clerk was just wrong. Sure shes due a early retirement.
I'm so happy he will never be free,!!!!!
Sucks to be him
Its all ao confusing, so she did tamper with the jurors but they dont care. And not that i care but they called the judge ma'am and sir? Was their confusion there?
You are not aging gracefully Alec, guess that prison food sucks huh?
Now go back to your cell an wait for big bubba
Cool smirk Alex. Bye bye
Good Riddance!
😂 👏 👏 👏
In 'Tangled Vines', bestselling true crime author John Glatt reconstructs the rise of the prestigious Murdaugh family and the shocking double murder that led to the downfall of its patriarch, Alex Murdaugh.
I really like this judge
He has the same eyes as Jodi Arias. Those are the eyes of a killer whose soul has been peeled out behind those same eyes. That's why they look so schizophrenic and empty. It's like you look into the eyes of a dead person. They are not dead. But their soul is dead. 12:18
He killed Paw paw 😨.
Beef sticks for life big red
Is that a man or a woman? In all honesty, I can't decide. I personally think Alec is innocent of the murders. But guilty of all the financial crimes. F that clerk of courts!
🥳🥂🎂🥳
Is it a boy or girl
He/she lol
Crooked system. Just because the trial was lengthly You don't want to grant a new one this is someone's life on the line
This it outrageous. If a jurors verdict was affected by the actions of court clerk regardless of what he’s been convicted of, he deserves a new trial.
From the start the Judge has seemed to be so hostile against Murdaugh. It's unusual to give a new trial unless the other side consents. But this Judge's dislike for Murdaugh is evident.
If she didn’t like Murdaugh then she wouldn’t have let their 2 witnesses in. She let in the other clerk and the alternate juror.
I had the same feeling about her as I did about the Neuman in the first trial. He may be guilty, but the trials were not unbiased.
@@emjaydark2811 the most unbiased Judge was Ted Bundy's judge in Florida and Oscar Pistorius's judge in So Africa ... they both convicted but not a speck of bias, if they disliked the defendants (Bundy or Pistorius), they hid it well. that's how a Court should be!
@@UFCtrumpsboxing I imagine one would form an opinion as the facts rolled out, but I think any judge should avoid the appearance of bias. When the first judge, Neuman read his scolding, humiliating, excoriation of Murdaugh at the first trial, I really lost respect for him as a judge and actually as a person. It seemed cruel and unnecessary to kick a man when he had just been locked up away forever.
Saw nothing wrong with the judges closing statements before sentencing of Alex after all, he had been convicted and we all must accept the jury's decision. The judge therefore has a right to address him according to his new status of being a convicted double murderer. @@emjaydark2811
Harpootlian isn't done yet. He'll get it overturned. The judge tipped her hand that she was biased in her decision by her editorial comments at the end.
No she didn’t. What she stated is that she’s never seen a case this and that theirs conflicting standards as to how to go about it. She went by the South Carolina standard but said that some federal courts use a different.
let them waste more time and take more of AMs money. he will not be found innocent. As the judge said the evidence was overwhelming and the verdict was not a surprise.
🤣
Remember that she is now the trial judge. Her comments regarding the weight of the evidence are completely appropriate given her role. She was agreeing with the comments by the first trial judge who made the same comment after the verdict.
They all know that the dirt's gonna come out. In the fact that murdoch's not guilty , it just goes to show how our justice system treats everybody guilty before proving innocent
Haha. That dude is guilty as sin. What are u sayin
@@jamiehoover9348 they sendin money to AMS commissary
What happened was horrible. But Alex was treated unfairly and prosecuted by media.
#freealexmurdaugh
So the jurors are lying and we just believe this lady who already lied and plagiarized. He's guilty but Gimme a break! How can you measure what was said by her at that time?? I think he most certainly should be granted new trial if the statements are true by jurors
Taxpayers should waste their dollars on a trial that you know will have the same outcome? Not cool bro
Nope ! Jurors have free will retrial denied !
I agree. If The clerk said this he should receive new trial. How can they just throw out what juror said?!
9:30 - 9:52 🛎🛎🛎
@@Elegant_Sausage You can thank Beck Hill nobody else..Take the murders out of it for a sec and ask yourself if you would be satisfied with the results knowing and hearing everything that was said..I think Becky blinked a million times and did not sound believable at all. He's gonna get a new trial regardless just may take while longer