I'd go for the A7RIV used. The price is decent. You get basically 2 lenses when you use crop mode and FF mode. e.g I use a 50mm 1.2 + 135mm 1.8 combo and can get 75mm and 243mm. The photo fps is better with the A7RIV. On top of that, you get the A7RIV because with the hi-res, you can generate another image/story within a shot. (A composition within a composition). You can get 2 images or more from 1 shot. That's the power of the A7RIV 61MP. For video, the fake S-cinetone works with the a7RIV as well. So you're not losing much... Great review and appreciate your video!
Thank you! If you mean as you personal choice, than sure, it is valid thought process. Generally speaking though, A7 IV has other advantages, especially for hybrid users, so A7R IV is definitely not a universally better choice.
Great video, as always! Appreciate the comparison. The interesting component for me is how close the ISO performance is between the two. Also the difference is AF performance in stills is closer than I anticipated. Doesn't make the decision easier, unless you're a video first shooter. Thanks again!
Blessed are you!! I upgraded to a Sony A7 III after my A6000 got water damaged!! While the Sony A7 III is a huge upgrade, I do miss the simplicity and compactness of the A6000.
Great video. I aim to purchase the a7R IV-A this May, having just completed my GM prime collection(14mm thru135mm). However, I Won't be parting with my trusty a7iii as it has and continues to serve me well. You've mentioned on several occasions that you prefer the Sony flip-style screen over the fully articulated ones. Call me old-school, but I couldn't agree more regarding the flip-screen usefulness for my purpose and style of photography. Other reviewers of the a7R IV-A seem to have reservations about the lack of RAW file size options. Since my plan to purchase this model hinges on capturing the most detail/information possible in my images, I don't view this as a concern. From a real-world perspective, have you found file size to be an issue?
Shooting compressed raw helps with size. I usually only shoot uncompressed with super important work or if I'm trying to reach out with extreme crops. External storage is your friend. I usually only have one project on my PC at a time. When done editing I transfer everything to external storage. Having a fast PC helps with editing a ton too.
Was thinking about buying an used A73. However, after browsing all those used A73s and realizing how good Sony cam holds its value, I decided to go for the new ones. Thanks for the great video, the A7IV it is then :D
Have both, and primarily use the A7RIV for stills, and the A7IV is my side camera. Usually a wide angle sits on the A7RIV and a telephoto on the A7IV. Where I find the A7IV useful is a few points: * As you noted, low ISO is roughly the same and ISO between 3200 and 12,800 seems a bit better to my eyes on the A7IV * Autofocus and tracking is much better with the longer telephotos in sub-optimal light with the A7IV, especially with the 200-600mm. The more reliable focusing to me is more useful than being able to crop (and it’s not like 33mp is bad for cropping either). *Smaller files. This is hard to understate. Especially if you do a lot of full speed bursts * Related, the A7IV just writes faster. The message “writing to memory card, unable to operate” kills me with the A7RIV, even with a fast UHS-II card and compressed raw. Seriously my only one complaint with the A7IV is that it’s limited to just 10fps in burst mode. Even 15fps would be a noticeable improvement. Sadly to get anything faster you need to jump up to the A9II, and that’s another $2000. That said, the A7RIV’s resolution is lovely, and the fact that I can run the APS-C 70-350mm lens (effectively a 105-525mm) when I can’t be bothered to lug around the 200-600mm and still get 26mp is fantastic. Really, being able to run any primes as a quasi-zoom is great. That 20mm f/1.8 looks good at 20mm, but it also works great as a 30mm in APS-C mode. But I think the A7IV is still great for stills…. It just falls behind the A7RIV because that’s probably still one of the best dedicated stills cameras available at that price point.
A7 IV gives 4608 x 3072 pixel images in crop which is still amazing for large prints. It's 14.1MP, and another youtuber proved there isn't a difference between 12mp and 100mp for prints.
Please test the eyeAF on the a7iv. Lots of people showing that it front focuses under certain conditions. Which are at around f1.8 or faster, closeup headshots (so face needs to fill in most of the frame). Hit rate is about 20-50%. Other Sony models are doing much better under same conditions (90%). A7iii is even doing much better (owners of both are confirming this). FB has a Group just for this issue alone. They've gotten word from Sony that a FW is on the way but we still need to let them and potential consumer be aware, otherwise Sony may just be trying to quiet everyone down and not release one. Thanks in advance!
@@TheHybridShooter I'm sure you could figure out how to do it. I find it a huge diservice for an influencer like you to not do so, because it could be reported. It would influence Sony to put out a firmware asap. This would be a great service to your viewers. I'm very shocked at your reply.
@RockMusicVideoReviewer First of all, I am definitely not an influencer, I am product reviewer. I simply don’t shoot portraits, I’m not sure what can be so shocking about that. There is plenty of channels that review cameras only by shooting portraits, so I will leave this to them and I will continue with my usual camera testing workflow. I’m not among creators supported by Sony, so I certainly can’t influence their decisions.
As a owner of A7III and A7IV I can say that the IV has a way better EyeAF (Firmware 1.10) than the III. Faster, more sticky and without front or backfocus.
enjoyed your review and comparing. I have the A7Riv and do alot of wildlife and bird photography. Do you think I would see and big difference in upgarding to the a7IV or even the new a6700?
@@Palomino3 A7R IV, because I do no video and it takes better Photos. 61 vs 33 MP is also a lot better for cropping (Small, shy birds). Also I know now that Bird eye detection does not mean it’s a better autofocus.
In which of these two cameras is the moiré effect more noticeable when shooting video? The S5IIX does not have an OLPF filter, but it is not certain whether the A7IV has one, as the information on the Internet varies.
hey thanks for the wonderful content !!! what do you prefer as a lens for either camera: tamron 28-75 g2, sigma 24-70 art or sony 24-105 for image quality
Which camera do you have? I have used all three. For me it breaks down this way: for travel and outdoor photo and video the 24-105 is nice because of the OSS. For general overall with F2.8 the Tamron can't be beaten (I own this one). The Sigma is crazy sharp, the best - it is quite large/heavy if you are using this for travel.
Absolutely. 33 megapixels is still an overkill for most scenarios in my opinion. Most people take photos to share on social platforms/personal websites or for clients. Unless you're doing a specific type of photography that could benefit from major cropping (i.e bird/animal photography, sports photography etc) then the Sony A7IV is more than enough. There are many disadvantages to having a high resolution camera. Huge file sizes, the need for a better spec computer to process/Edit RAW files, slightly worse low light performance, the fact that not many lenses (apart from G master lenses) can actually utilize that many megapixels and finally the huge price tag. Not for everybody tbh. The A7IV is the perfect sweetspot.
I currently have the original A7RIV, wishing they put that nicer screen from the RVIA update in the original, but oh well! The viewfinder is still jaw dropping though. It is the best viewfinder I have ever used (though I never used the A7SIII!) The crop mode is honestly my favorite part about the A7RIV. Makes me need fewer lenses for most work!
@@Jaydoublyou I know, but I still get the shot, and getting the shot is what matters, not how someone’s face looks slightly less pancake than a super telephoto. As long as I’m not using the crop mode when wide, it’s a helpful option.
How about test shots of the Sony a7iv 4k crop 60fps with Sony 16-55 f2.8 lens? The new Tamron aps-c Zoom lenses and the Sigma new aps-c Zoom lenses. Also, do several similar tests with Fuji aps-c prime lenses for Sony e-mount: Fuji 16mm f1.4; Sigma 19mm f/2.8; Sigma 30mm f/1.4; Sigma 56mm f/1.4.
A7iv vs a7s3 4k60 sharpness: which is sharper? Yes I am ignoring the crop. Maybe do the test with 24 gm and 35 gm. Or use the same lens but move a bit farther.
Hey brother what would you recommend for someone doing both photography and video in terms of a single camera and lens(es) if budget/cost was unlimited? So far I am thinking either Sony Alpha 1 (A1), Sony A7IV, or A7SIII . Ignore prices, I looking to buy once/cry once on most versatile camera & lens(es) setup.
Now I am closed in on either A7IV, A1, Nikon Z9, or Canon R3 as my first camera to use for both photo and videos. Also like the idea of a single lens so something like the Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DI III VXD might fit well at least on the Sony camera I think. What would you do in my shoes out of these choices if cost was not a factor to consider?
@@tvm2209 If cost is no factor, and you want the best Sony there is, go for the A1, otherwise, just go for the A7IV since it's cheaper and would give you extra money for lenses.
Video has always been a secondary role for A7R IV, it is not a bad video camera, but there are much better options for videos at a fraction of the A7R IV price.
Have been considering upgrading from my a6400. I’m not there yet. I’m not convinced it’s worth it. I do wildlife only. I don’t do inflight photos much as they are often boring looking against a blue sky or the shutter speed was so high that there isn’t any detail. So. I’m not into that.
Fabulous insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each camera. So much so I have stopped my plan to update from a 7iii to iv. I do absolutely no video so it looks like the R is the better option particularly I use primes and crop a bit and much prefer the tilting screen. I just need to get my head around those huge files the R generates. Anyone out there worked through this problem?
@@TheHybridShooter Its hard for me to quantify, because I did not have them at the same time. - While only playing with menu settings, my A74 suddenly was at 28% from full, without taking a single shot or video! (Original Sony battery)
I own the Sony a7riv and the noise level being good under ISO 3200 in dark shadows especially is not true, that thing cries out noise by just passing 1000 ISO
I've got a problem when shooting with A7 IV I set photo and video mode settings the same I mean same exposures, PP off Everything is the same on video and photo mode But when i switched to video mode from photo mode I could see the massive difference in colors, WB, Saturation in photo mode, everything looks great, but when i switched to video its seems less saturated, less contrast, even less blacks not only PP off, even S-Log 3 / 2 the same difference is still there Any way to match photos and video?
@@TheHybridShooter no I actually didn't seperate for photo video settings, after than i reset the cam and tried freshly, but that problem is still there
R: means resolution a7riv, S: is for sensitivity a7siii, C: is for compact a7c, a7 is the budget hybrid a7iv, and the a1 is the flagship hybrid like the a1.
*30 Great Accessories for Sony A7IV* - bit.ly/A7IVaccessories
*Sony E-mount in 2022* - State of the System - bit.ly/E-mount2022
Even in 2022 some of the best reviews and comparisons out there. Love the no BS approach 👍
Thank you!
I'd go for the A7RIV used. The price is decent. You get basically 2 lenses when you use crop mode and FF mode. e.g I use a 50mm 1.2 + 135mm 1.8 combo and can get 75mm and 243mm. The photo fps is better with the A7RIV. On top of that, you get the A7RIV because with the hi-res, you can generate another image/story within a shot. (A composition within a composition). You can get 2 images or more from 1 shot. That's the power of the A7RIV 61MP.
For video, the fake S-cinetone works with the a7RIV as well. So you're not losing much...
Great review and appreciate your video!
Thank you! If you mean as you personal choice, than sure, it is valid thought process. Generally speaking though, A7 IV has other advantages, especially for hybrid users, so A7R IV is definitely not a universally better choice.
Your review style is unique and provides insight that is much needed.
Thank you!
My problem with the A7RIV is that there is no option for smaller RAW files. The A7RV solved this problem.
Great video, as always! Appreciate the comparison. The interesting component for me is how close the ISO performance is between the two. Also the difference is AF performance in stills is closer than I anticipated. Doesn't make the decision easier, unless you're a video first shooter. Thanks again!
Thank you!
I think I ll go for A7R IV despite menu.
always felt that the af on the Riv wasn’t reliable in difficult lighting situations. the a7iv and even the a7iii feel more reliable
Depends on the version. A version has significant uncredited AF improvements.
@@TheHybridShooter no other reviewer has mentioned this golden tidbit! Thank you.
Fantastic review. I use A7S III for video but the A7R IV A for high res photography with my Sigma lenses !
Sigma art 40mm is best.
Which one is better for event photography ?
Which one has best image quality
Great video and straight to the point. I never comment, but this one deserves it.
Thank you! I appreciate your feedback.
Which camera have you used for capture this video?
I want to shoot shortfilm. Then which cam is better to buy ???
And here I am with my A6000...
Same, it’s time to upgrade though 😭
Legend
Same. About to upgrade to the a6500 though lol
Blessed are you!! I upgraded to a Sony A7 III after my A6000 got water damaged!!
While the Sony A7 III is a huge upgrade, I do miss the simplicity and compactness of the A6000.
Same bro lol
Great video. I aim to purchase the a7R IV-A this May, having just completed my GM prime collection(14mm thru135mm). However, I Won't be parting with my trusty a7iii as it has and continues to serve me well. You've mentioned on several occasions that you prefer the Sony flip-style screen over the fully articulated ones. Call me old-school, but I couldn't agree more regarding the flip-screen usefulness for my purpose and style of photography.
Other reviewers of the a7R IV-A seem to have reservations about the lack of RAW file size options. Since my plan to purchase this model hinges on capturing the most detail/information possible in my images, I don't view this as a concern. From a real-world perspective, have you found file size to be an issue?
Hi, did you work through the file size issue? I have the same concern
Shooting compressed raw helps with size. I usually only shoot uncompressed with super important work or if I'm trying to reach out with extreme crops. External storage is your friend. I usually only have one project on my PC at a time. When done editing I transfer everything to external storage. Having a fast PC helps with editing a ton too.
Im thinking of buying the A7R lV-A as well but im debating on that or the A7Rlll
Was thinking about buying an used A73. However, after browsing all those used A73s and realizing how good Sony cam holds its value, I decided to go for the new ones. Thanks for the great video, the A7IV it is then :D
I just do photos and tbh this is my main priority.
So just assume both have same 33megapixels
Now which one is better?
Have both, and primarily use the A7RIV for stills, and the A7IV is my side camera. Usually a wide angle sits on the A7RIV and a telephoto on the A7IV.
Where I find the A7IV useful is a few points:
* As you noted, low ISO is roughly the same and ISO between 3200 and 12,800 seems a bit better to my eyes on the A7IV
* Autofocus and tracking is much better with the longer telephotos in sub-optimal light with the A7IV, especially with the 200-600mm. The more reliable focusing to me is more useful than being able to crop (and it’s not like 33mp is bad for cropping either).
*Smaller files. This is hard to understate. Especially if you do a lot of full speed bursts
* Related, the A7IV just writes faster. The message “writing to memory card, unable to operate” kills me with the A7RIV, even with a fast UHS-II card and compressed raw.
Seriously my only one complaint with the A7IV is that it’s limited to just 10fps in burst mode. Even 15fps would be a noticeable improvement. Sadly to get anything faster you need to jump up to the A9II, and that’s another $2000.
That said, the A7RIV’s resolution is lovely, and the fact that I can run the APS-C 70-350mm lens (effectively a 105-525mm) when I can’t be bothered to lug around the 200-600mm and still get 26mp is fantastic. Really, being able to run any primes as a quasi-zoom is great. That 20mm f/1.8 looks good at 20mm, but it also works great as a 30mm in APS-C mode.
But I think the A7IV is still great for stills…. It just falls behind the A7RIV because that’s probably still one of the best dedicated stills cameras available at that price point.
A7 IV gives 4608 x 3072 pixel images in crop which is still amazing for large prints. It's 14.1MP, and another youtuber proved there isn't a difference between 12mp and 100mp for prints.
Which would be better for macro photography? And great video, thank you!
Thank you! A7R IV, if you want to capture maximal amount of detail.
@@TheHybridShooter cheers! It is great to finally watch your videos again after a while of not seing your posts on my feeds.
I've watched a lot of reviews of a7iv but after watching your reviews my inner me was like 'wow'
How is low light photography and noise porblem comparing between both cameras? I would appreciate to learn your opinion.
It is explained in the video.
What lenses would you recommend for the a7r iv for shooting interior (furniture, interior design, architectural)? Thanks in advance!
Sigma 14-24 f2.8
Does the A7RIV have a video recording limit?
no
when I look at new sony cams I dont understand what was the point of ditching the mirror if we are back to slr sizes
Please test the eyeAF on the a7iv. Lots of people showing that it front focuses under certain conditions. Which are at around f1.8 or faster, closeup headshots (so face needs to fill in most of the frame). Hit rate is about 20-50%. Other Sony models are doing much better under same conditions (90%). A7iii is even doing much better (owners of both are confirming this). FB has a Group just for this issue alone. They've gotten word from Sony that a FW is on the way but we still need to let them and potential consumer be aware, otherwise Sony may just be trying to quiet everyone down and not release one. Thanks in advance!
I don’t shoot portraits / people at all, so I will leave that to somebody who dose.
@@TheHybridShooter I'm sure you could figure out how to do it. I find it a huge diservice for an influencer like you to not do so, because it could be reported. It would influence Sony to put out a firmware asap. This would be a great service to your viewers. I'm very shocked at your reply.
@RockMusicVideoReviewer First of all, I am definitely not an influencer, I am product reviewer. I simply don’t shoot portraits, I’m not sure what can be so shocking about that. There is plenty of channels that review cameras only by shooting portraits, so I will leave this to them and I will continue with my usual camera testing workflow.
I’m not among creators supported by Sony, so I certainly can’t influence their decisions.
As a owner of A7III and A7IV I can say that the IV has a way better EyeAF (Firmware 1.10) than the III. Faster, more sticky and without front or backfocus.
enjoyed your review and comparing. I have the A7Riv and do alot of wildlife and bird photography. Do you think I would see and big difference in upgarding to the a7IV or even the new a6700?
I am struggling with the decision between the A7IV and RIV. Did you change to the IV?
@@Pflichteingabewhat camera did you get?
@@Palomino3 A7R IV, because I do no video and it takes better Photos. 61 vs 33 MP is also a lot better for cropping (Small, shy birds). Also I know now that Bird eye detection does not mean it’s a better autofocus.
In which of these two cameras is the moiré effect more noticeable when shooting video? The S5IIX does not have an OLPF filter, but it is not certain whether the A7IV has one, as the information on the Internet varies.
It is not an issue with either of them .
shoot. so a7 IV is for me. almost pulled the trigger on an a7r not knowing that I wouldn't even be using the features I'm paying more for lol.
Super great video. I really learn a lot and enjoy it. Appreciate the comparison. You'd helped me to choose my first Sony. Thank you!
hey thanks for the wonderful content !!!
what do you prefer as a lens for either camera: tamron 28-75 g2, sigma 24-70 art or sony 24-105 for image quality
Which camera do you have? I have used all three. For me it breaks down this way: for travel and outdoor photo and video the 24-105 is nice because of the OSS. For general overall with F2.8 the Tamron can't be beaten (I own this one). The Sigma is crazy sharp, the best - it is quite large/heavy if you are using this for travel.
I'm going to do macro and bird photography and confused which one to take that will be reliable to do both... thank you
Well, that it what this video is about... both have advantages and disadvantages.
@@TheHybridShooter if you being me which one you would choose? 😀
@@ghearizky5623 I can't answer that, I don't know what are your priorities and preferences.
@@TheHybridShooter i need one that good enough for macro but also have reliable autofocus especially for bird in flight with Sony 200-600 lens🙏
So for food and portrait photography, which is more recommended?
Well, that is what this video is about. Both are suitable, so it depends on your preferences.
If I am not viewing the pictures on a 8K screen or planning on getting large prints, is the A7 iv better for stills given the extra features?
Absolutely.
33 megapixels is still an overkill for most scenarios in my opinion.
Most people take photos to share on social platforms/personal websites or for clients. Unless you're doing a specific type of photography that could benefit from major cropping (i.e bird/animal photography, sports photography etc) then the Sony A7IV is more than enough.
There are many disadvantages to having a high resolution camera.
Huge file sizes, the need for a better spec computer to process/Edit RAW files, slightly worse low light performance, the fact that not many lenses (apart from G master lenses) can actually utilize that many megapixels and finally the huge price tag.
Not for everybody tbh. The A7IV is the perfect sweetspot.
I generally agree, except the part about low light performance and lens requirements.
Awesome thanks! I was so confused I didn’t know what the R versions were. I wanna upgrade from a Sony a6600 and I’m thinking about the a7iv
Hi,
You mean hybrid for a74 and high res is a7r4? is it ttrue ?
Yes.
Sony a7 4 or a7 R4 which is better to videography ??
A7 IV
What do you think about canon colors?
I don't particularly like Canon colors, I much prefer accurate Sony or Fuji colors.
Thank you for the informative and helpful comparison video! Learnt so much! Good luck!
My pleasure, thank you for watching!
Which one best for wildlife & bird photography??
Probably A7 IV.
@@TheHybridShooter thank u🙏
@@TheHybridShooter why is that? Is the Autofokus that much better? Having the option to crop heavily is certainly an advantage of the R version
Yes, the AF is much better.
Which is to buy a7m4 or r4
That is what this video is about...
So... how does blackout during bursts feel on both? Does the a7RIVa have the same blackout periods?
Depends on whether you use CFExpress card in A7 IV. A7R IV is actually better if you use SD cards in both, as you can see in the video.
Your photos where are they taken? Seems to be a nice place to go for a vacation
Mostly Bratislava.
I currently have the original A7RIV, wishing they put that nicer screen from the RVIA update in the original, but oh well! The viewfinder is still jaw dropping though. It is the best viewfinder I have ever used (though I never used the A7SIII!)
The crop mode is honestly my favorite part about the A7RIV. Makes me need fewer lenses for most work!
A crop doesn’t really mimicking the characteristic of a longer lens though
@@Jaydoublyou I know, but I still get the shot, and getting the shot is what matters, not how someone’s face looks slightly less pancake than a super telephoto. As long as I’m not using the crop mode when wide, it’s a helpful option.
Very useful and clear differences explained, good video!
Thank you!
Thank you so much for this detailed video. It has made it very clear which one I wish to purchase.
@@xochilgarcia232 my pleasure, thank you for watching!
How about test shots of the Sony a7iv 4k crop 60fps with Sony 16-55 f2.8 lens? The new Tamron aps-c Zoom lenses and the Sigma new aps-c Zoom lenses. Also, do several similar tests with Fuji aps-c prime lenses for Sony e-mount: Fuji 16mm f1.4; Sigma 19mm f/2.8; Sigma 30mm f/1.4; Sigma 56mm f/1.4.
I don't have those lenses.
Which is the best camera?
Sony a7iv or canon r5
Depends on your preferences and intended use.
Canon definitely. Although I only recommend Sony
@@aspilobo A7 IV and R5 aren't even in the same category, so any recommendation is pointless without further context.
Found this video very useful. Appreciate
Very nice video. Thanks! Which Viewer is that?
this vid helped me a lot
What’s the difference between A7RIV and A7RIVa?
Display.
Great vid as always....
Thank you!
A7iv vs a7s3 4k60 sharpness: which is sharper? Yes I am ignoring the crop. Maybe do the test with 24 gm and 35 gm. Or use the same lens but move a bit farther.
A7 IV is more detailed. Sharpness depends on the settings.
Hey brother what would you recommend for someone doing both photography and video in terms of a single camera and lens(es) if budget/cost was unlimited?
So far I am thinking either Sony Alpha 1 (A1), Sony A7IV, or A7SIII .
Ignore prices, I looking to buy once/cry once on most versatile camera & lens(es) setup.
Nikon Z9. It is simply the best at this moment.
Sony A7 IV no doubt.
Now I am closed in on either A7IV, A1, Nikon Z9, or Canon R3 as my first camera to use for both photo and videos. Also like the idea of a single lens so something like the Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DI III VXD might fit well at least on the Sony camera I think.
What would you do in my shoes out of these choices if cost was not a factor to consider?
@@tvm2209 If cost is no factor, and you want the best Sony there is, go for the A1, otherwise, just go for the A7IV since it's cheaper and would give you extra money for lenses.
Great Info, great review, very clear...!
Thank you!
I bought the A7Riv A few days ago for filming now just watching this makes me regret. Any positive reviews on the A7Riv A for filming?😢
Video has always been a secondary role for A7R IV, it is not a bad video camera, but there are much better options for videos at a fraction of the A7R IV price.
which auto focus system from these cameras would be better for landscape photos?
A7 IV has slightly better AF, A7R IV is better for landscapes.
@@TheHybridShooter how about the phase detection points? Which one has covers more of the sensor in both vertical and horizontal?
Everything seems nice. I could afford any of them. But I will just keep my a99 and use it as long as it will last.
really useful, thank you!
Yea this was amazing quality video!
Thank you!
Have been considering upgrading from my a6400. I’m not there yet. I’m not convinced it’s worth it. I do wildlife only. I don’t do inflight photos much as they are often boring looking against a blue sky or the shutter speed was so high that there isn’t any detail. So. I’m not into that.
It's your choice...
Which one is better for birding, nature photography?
A7 IV
I think r4, because of better CROP ...
Fabulous insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each camera. So much so I have stopped my plan to update from a 7iii to iv. I do absolutely no video so it looks like the R is the better option particularly I use primes and crop a bit and much prefer the tilting screen. I just need to get my head around those huge files the R generates. Anyone out there worked through this problem?
The files are pretty big, I took 200 photos today but it only took about 8 minutes to upload all of them to Lightroom (i own a 2021 MacBook Pro)
@@Jarred_Gooch thanks for feedback. I bought an rV last week and like you am not having any upload issues. Fears overcome! It's a fabulous camera.
Thank you very much
My pleasure, thank you for watching!
Very good. Thank you
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
nice review, thanks
Thank you!
I am confused. You are comparing the A7 IV and the A7R IV in the video, but the title of your video says A7 IV vs A7R IV A.
It is A7R IV A version, I just don’t say it all the time.
thank you again great video
My pleasure!
Thanks for sharing.
Always my pleasure!
Great review. If you have A7Siii, I would love to see the comparison between A7Siii & A7iv as well
Thank you
You're welcome!
Great work.
Thank you!
Sony A7 IV and Sony A7 IV A are different cameras or the same camera?
There is no A7 IV A.
Hagan una versión en español por favor de este video, no se puede ir leyendo y ver las comparativas en la pantalla al mismo tiempo…
Nice update
Thank you!
Nicely done
Thank you!
very good review
Thank you!
twice as many megapixel is not twice as much resolution... Twice the resolution would be four times the megapixelcount (e.g Full-HD vs 4k)
Definitely not.
in here where i live (as i writen this comment). the price difference is just 100 usd.
I noticed, that my batteries go down faster in the A7IV than in the A7C... More power eats more power, I guess ;-)
Yes, but the difference shouldn't be huge.
@@TheHybridShooter Its hard for me to quantify, because I did not have them at the same time.
- While only playing with menu settings, my A74 suddenly was at 28% from full, without taking a single shot or video!
(Original Sony battery)
I own the Sony a7riv and the noise level being good under ISO 3200 in dark shadows especially is not true, that thing cries out noise by just passing 1000 ISO
That depends on your definition of "good". You won't get less noise with any full frame camera, so the A7 IV objectively is "good" in this regard.
Good Video
Hello Budapest!
Hello, but it wasn't shot in Budapest.
@@TheHybridShooter Oh, I’m so sorry about that. I thought it is Budapest
I've got a problem when shooting with A7 IV
I set photo and video mode settings the same
I mean same exposures, PP off
Everything is the same on video and photo mode
But when i switched to video mode from photo mode
I could see the massive difference in colors, WB, Saturation
in photo mode, everything looks great, but when i switched to video
its seems less saturated, less contrast, even less blacks
not only PP off, even S-Log 3 / 2 the same difference is still there
Any way to match photos and video?
You are probably using separate settings for stills and video, I have talked about that in this video.
@@TheHybridShooter no I actually didn't seperate for photo video settings, after than i reset the cam and tried freshly, but that problem is still there
@@kaveen04 Something is probably "ticked" in separate settings menu.
I like Bratislava.
5th time watching this video haha thanks!
First?
what is sony doing with these camera names :D:D:D:D
It is actually very simple.
R: means resolution a7riv, S: is for sensitivity a7siii, C: is for compact a7c, a7 is the budget hybrid a7iv, and the a1 is the flagship hybrid like the a1.
So in in other words If you're not printing photos no need to get R7r....
No, that is too oversimplified statement.