Your comment about women who love their partners but are about to blow up their marriages so they can go have sex with me and partners strikes me in a new way. How many times has a psychological or psycho spiritual world attempted to say women who do that are acting out of unconscious trauma when in reality they’re acting out their sexual needs… A whole new way and perspective to look from
@Movement medicine. So true. I've always noticed how when professionals in the media talk about a young woman acting out sexually it always seems to include that the young women are somehow acting out of insecurity or trauma. I often throughout the years heard myself say "Maybe she's not insecure. Maybe she's just horny! 😃 Lol
No unconscious trauma, believe me...Just nature..Hot sex is hot sex, nothing to do with love...But women are "forcedly " taught that these two (always) go together
@@ryanbailey8588 what is a desire but something that has stemmed from a human need and evolved into something more complex? I don’t need the elaborate food I now have access to. That is a desire. But the need for food is there, so why not enjoy the food I eat? Sex - it is such a thing that has evolved into both. Just like our appetite/desire for food fills our need for substance to keep us alive/healthy/happy…sexual desire fulfills our need for for what keeps us connected (which is absolutely a need of social humans, so thus alive)/healthy and happy. While science may not label sex as a physiological need on the same level as food, water, shelter (yet, since even science keeps changing its mind) if one wishes to be in the best health as possible, learning how to have healthy sex and most importantly for a woman, how to relax enough into her ability to have multiple orgasms from the different places in her body that are physiologically built to provide this response is correlated to her overall holistic health (mental, emotional, physical and spiritual). So stating that sex is “something that should be controlled” as just an appetite - vs education on all that sex is in metaphor and literal…so one can learn to appropriate it for themselves in a healthy way- well this leads to the increasing states of repression. In turn this leads to growing rates of depression, anxiety and the like. Next, if sexual arousal is repressed and/or not channeled in a healthy way…it can cause physical health issues. So, it can be assumed that having some sex is healthy and good for everyone - and this is the need side of it. It is the desire/appetite for sex - the type, the way, how often that will be as varied as the color of our skin, eyes, culture, tastes for food In the end - naming it a need or desire really is semantics…human bodies were designed to be at their optimal health with it …and it is a huge bonus that when done right is beyond enjoyable.
@@lancejohnson127 in churches, in movies. It is subliminal…and covert but is is absolutely still built into the culture that “woman play at sex to get love and men play at love to get sex.” This is a saying in Christian church i heard all the time
not sure I really get those "new metrics" nor how anyone measures spontaneous arousal. I'm not saying I know what is what. I am just skeptical that anyone else does either. Good on them for at least trying to get a handle on it. Even if it includes mining of other research. Obtaining reliable objective data, is iffy enough that you might as well add a "blind" by using someone else's data. If nothing else you are less likely to be accused of skewing your own data by some dubious accumulation process. And that part about women having orgasms but still getting bored with the relationship: yep I think I have seen some examples of that. She wanted to be IN LOVE and in my case I think she discovered she wasn't. It wasn't about the sex part, it was the other thing. And i have had a similar experience for my own part. I do agree with Wednesday about "not wanting sex" might really be something more like "not wanting sex with THAT person". Which latter idea is more anthropologically oriented rather than social culture oriented. And I think she is right, that certain levels of social entitlement, do give some women more choices but not that many of them.
Female workplace meaningful workplace? Really this is silly for Dr. martin to say? How many men are CEO's? She is comparing the whole workplace,. The men she is talking about are 1% of 1% of men. And the domestic violence to all men beating their wives is not correct either. Good info in this video, but Dr. Martins summation on parts of the video are just plain wrong
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Your comment about women who love their partners but are about to blow up their marriages so they can go have sex with me and partners strikes me in a new way. How many times has a psychological or psycho spiritual world attempted to say women who do that are acting out of unconscious trauma when in reality they’re acting out their sexual needs… A whole new way and perspective to look from
@Movement medicine. So true. I've always noticed how when professionals in the media talk about a young woman acting out sexually it always seems to include that the young women are somehow acting out of insecurity or trauma. I often throughout the years heard myself say "Maybe she's not insecure. Maybe she's just horny! 😃 Lol
No unconscious trauma, believe me...Just nature..Hot sex is hot sex, nothing to do with love...But women are "forcedly " taught that these two (always) go together
Sex isn’t a need. It’s a desire.
@@ryanbailey8588 what is a desire but something that has stemmed from a human need and evolved into something more complex? I don’t need the elaborate food I now have access to. That is a desire. But the need for food is there, so why not enjoy the food I eat? Sex - it is such a thing that has evolved into both. Just like our appetite/desire for food fills our need for substance to keep us alive/healthy/happy…sexual desire fulfills our need for for what keeps us connected (which is absolutely a need of social humans, so thus alive)/healthy and happy.
While science may not label sex as a physiological need on the same level as food, water, shelter (yet, since even science keeps changing its mind) if one wishes to be in the best health as possible, learning how to have healthy sex and most importantly for a woman, how to relax enough into her ability to have multiple orgasms from the different places in her body that are physiologically built to provide this response is correlated to her overall holistic health (mental, emotional, physical and spiritual).
So stating that sex is “something that should be controlled” as just an appetite - vs education on all that sex is in metaphor and literal…so one can learn to appropriate it for themselves in a healthy way- well this leads to the increasing states of repression. In turn this leads to growing rates of depression, anxiety and the like.
Next, if sexual arousal is repressed and/or not channeled in a healthy way…it can cause physical health issues.
So, it can be assumed that having some sex is healthy and good for everyone - and this is the need side of it.
It is the desire/appetite for sex - the type, the way, how often that will be as varied as the color of our skin, eyes, culture, tastes for food
In the end - naming it a need or desire really is semantics…human bodies were designed to be at their optimal health with it …and it is a huge bonus that when done right is beyond enjoyable.
@@lancejohnson127 in churches, in movies. It is subliminal…and covert but is is absolutely still built into the culture that “woman play at sex to get love and men play at love to get sex.” This is a saying in Christian church i heard all the time
not sure I really get those "new metrics" nor how anyone measures spontaneous arousal.
I'm not saying I know what is what.
I am just skeptical that anyone else does either.
Good on them for at least trying to get a handle on it.
Even if it includes mining of other research. Obtaining reliable objective data, is iffy enough
that you might as well add a "blind" by using someone else's data. If nothing else you are less
likely to be accused of skewing your own data by some dubious accumulation process.
And that part about women having orgasms but still getting bored with the relationship:
yep I think I have seen some examples of that. She wanted to be IN LOVE and in my case
I think she discovered she wasn't. It wasn't about the sex part, it was the other thing. And
i have had a similar experience for my own part.
I do agree with Wednesday about "not wanting sex" might really be something more like
"not wanting sex with THAT person". Which latter idea is more anthropologically oriented
rather than social culture oriented. And I think she is right, that certain levels of social
entitlement, do give some women more choices but not that many of them.
Female workplace meaningful workplace? Really this is silly for Dr. martin to say? How many men are CEO's? She is comparing the whole workplace,. The men she is talking about are 1% of 1% of men. And the domestic violence to all men beating their wives is not correct either. Good info in this video, but Dr. Martins summation on parts of the video are just plain wrong