Are you truly fully informed? Go to ground.news/mentourpilot to compare news from around the world and gain a deeper understanding of every story on Aviation and more. Subscribe for 50% off unlimited access for a limited time.
Could you also do Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 as well? Ethiopian Airlines had trained their pilots on the emergency procedure for MCAS after Lion Air but the procedure didn’t work. Edit: Never mind. You said it will be your next video. Hopefully, you can clarify some things on this one since the NTSB and BEA reports seem to think that the pilots are to blame as well even though they followed the correct procedure and Boeing never mentioned the role that speed would play in turning off MCAS.
@31:12 Could that be due to training that every switch you throw while using the plane has to be set back to standard before handing off the plane? For locomotives that is how we do - and then we report (and thus make it visible to other train drivers) the issues and what might have caused it, this way it can be investigated by the technicians.
@@Moon_x_sun it depends on which channel it's televised I guess, you see these aircraft investigations or 3 part specials that are just as long. Either way, we love to see the content 😁!
@@samueldennis8343 that’s probably true I just feel like in general tv they usually explain things in even simpler terms than Petter (he is still good at explaining tho just doesn’t “over” explain as much) :) I agree tho it’s great content he makes and I love watching it
My lyft driver yesterday told me he’s beginning his training as a commercial pilot soon. I got to geek out about this channel to him and about how helpful it’s been to me from the passenger/general educational side. I hope he checks it out.
I've never seen any science or documentary videos like these. You've set a bar so high I find it hard to put into words. The level of respect and sensitivity to the people involved, the lack of exploitation of tragedy, the skill of making science understandable yet fully accurate, and the engagement with the audience. I hope others will learn from you. I'm able to let my kids watch these and know they are going to learn science, respect, and not develop fears. Thank you.
I remember when this and the Ethiopian crashes first happened, one of my first questions was "has an erroneous MCAS activation ever been dealt with successfully?" And the answer here is quite shocking, that it was done on the accident aircraft literally the flight before the accident flight. Awesome job as usual
yes. it's too bad though that Boeing had completely hidden MCAS from pilots because even though the crew successfully dealt with the MCAS problem on the flight before this one, they didn't know the real cause, didn't know about MCAS and the fact that it was a faulty AOA sensor (and a horrifically poor and dangerous design of MCAS) that caused the problem.
@@pimacanyon6208 Indeed. It seems as if even the Captain of the previous flight thought therefore that something with the airspeed indicator would cause the problem, resulting in not notifying the trim issues he had faced, what caused then the accident crew to be totally startled when the problems reoccured. You simply can´t fix a problem when you don´t know what is causing it.
This reminds me of an old programming joke. A programmer, a systems analyst, and an hardware engineer are car-sharing to get to work. During the commute the brakes on the car fail. The driver manages to stop the car before it crashes and the three colleagues get out to discuss what to do next. The hardware engineer says "We should tear down the braking system, find the fault, and fix it." The systems analyst disagrees and says "No, we should diagnose the issue using the maintenance manual. Once we know what could be causing the failure, we can go right to the correct system and fix it!" The programmer listens in horror and says "Look the car is clearly not showing any problems right now. Let's just get back in and drive to see if the problem reoccurs."
The interesting thing about that is how often faults do occur on a hardware level, but are assumed to be occurring on a software level. And since we have less and less people these days that are capable of understanding hardware and have not been trained on it, often the default approach is to fix the software. And once no faults are found, they proceed. Very scary stuff.
@@mediocreman2IMO a contributing factor to less and less people understanding hardwares is the hardwares we use today get more and more complex especially with a complex machine like airplane.
Honestly this and similar stories are baffling to me; they are struggling to maintain pitch, the main/strongest determinant of pitch is the trim, yet they don't actually discuss (captain) or realize (FO) the trim abnormalities while pulling at crazy high pounds of pressure. Bizarre. And happened many times with different variations.
@@SR-xv8de I think the main reason is that they couldn't see the exact value of trim position on the screen. And they had no time to look at it in hardware. So if you're not aware it could get worse by itself, you won't do any large corrections to the value. It looked more like the vertical stabilizer was going to break soon because of their 'trim up' corrections.
I have a short attention span and typically struggle to watch videos over 10 minutes or so, but when I see a Mentour video that's over an hour long, I know I can eagerly and attentively watch the whole thing in one sitting.
As a software engineer, it never ceases to amaze me how, albeit in a much lower severity level, of course, a lot of the factors that contribute to these accidents can be correlated with incidents in my field of work: design flaws, environmental factors, under-training, poor communication, deviation normalization, confirmation bias, subtle incapacitation, the Swiss cheese model, you name it. I can say your videos really help me to be better at my job by knowing these factors and trying my best to overcome them as they arise. Thanks a lot!
This is because most management see information technology in general and software development in particular as a cost, not a benefit. Therefore the work is given to the lowest bidder. The fact their entire business and their reputation is in the hands of said low-bidders never enters their tiny minds.
Airline Pilot and former mechanic at a major airline here. Mentour my deepest respect to you and your team for such a well documented and narrated story from both the technical and professional side. I learned a lot from watching this one!! Thanks
Software developer here. You and other aviation channels have influenced my day-to-day professional understanding quite a bit. Also as a software dev, I see many of the same mix of human + system failures in my own working world. Though in my business that usually just means someone’s order gets stuffed up, rather than a plane crashing.
@@Georgiagreen317 I use the acronym SISO. (not to be confused with sisu, which is a very positive thing, when genuinely suomi that is. And I say that as ruotsalainen.)
Considering you got criticism (and to an extent rightly so) every time you had a betterhelp sponsorship, I think more thanks should be given to you now that you no longer take sponsorships from them.
I want you to know I actually use these videos for leadership training at my job at a steel mill. It may not seem related, but I've found major benefits discussing CRM style leadership with my people, and I have seen benefits to it. Thank you from America!
@@MentourPilot When I worked in care, I encouraged this kind of thing before I even knew what 'CRM' was, as it seemed like the best thing since sliced bread to do. It absolutely had a positive effect. It is great you are doing a CRM course like that, it is a game changing concept for many areas and walks of life. UA232s example is probably my favourite successful use of CRM to point out.
@@MentourPilotthat’s super cool. I for one would be very interested in taking this course for me and my team! We work in a creative field without real risks like this but still so useful.
Same here, although my work is way less meaningful. I adopt the leadership and good CRM practices to make a healthier work environment for my team, and Petter has become a landmark of those qualities to me.
As a former stewardess for Icelandair for many years without any serious incidents I find your videos terrifying and exhilarating at the same time. It is like looking at horror movie and not being able to stop looking. I love your calm voice and Norwegian accent. Thank your for all your hard work on this.
I really love your videos. I loved Mayday episodes but they were over dramatic. Yours are so much better. Sending a thanks here since I'm from India and Patreon doesn't accept UPI yet
Damn, one of your best videos so far! I was quite familiar with the uncommanded MCAS activations on this flight, but I had no idea a crew the day before faced the exact same problems and didn't crash. It's amazing how 2 different crews can be all that stands between a minor inconvenience and a fatal accident. Great work by you and your team!
I work in Cyber Security, and see a lot of similarities between how we are supposed to handle CRM type issues during incidents. I have definitely improved my professional capabilities when it comes to incident response coordination and communication from watching your videos. One of the major issues we see in my field is people assuming another party knows what they are referencing with unspecific communication, similar to in this incident, although thankfully none have been serious enough to cost people their lives in my career. Thank you from Denmark for the great content!
Thanks for that. I work in a similar field and I over-communicate now because I see how poor communication is in the cockpit sometimes and I am convinced that my coworkers and the vendors that I work with must think I am thick in the head because I always clarify things that are not clear to all parties. And even though nobody really says it out loud I know things have gone much, much better because of that clarity among all parties.
@@mediocreman2 In this case the difference what Boeing assumed and what actually happened was simply crazy: Boeing (or Boeing´s software experts) assumed that the Pilots would identify the failure within three seconds (!) as a Trim runaway and would then immediately take the correct procedure to solve the problem. In fact the first crew identified the problem after more than two minutes and only caused by the Good Luck that they had a third Pilot on the Jump Seat in the Cockpit, who had experience with this Aircraft model and from his position a better view onto the Trim Wheels than the two Pilots in the front seats. The second crew identified the problem at no point of their 12-minutes-flight.
@@NicolaW72 As a layman it just seems impossible to believe that Boeing were so overconfident in MCAS that they didn't even bother testing it enough to figure these issues out. They've got blood on their hands now (if it bothers them, that is)
@@guestguest9603 It is indeed the question if they at Boeing really believed what they stated: That the Pilots were able to identify the problem within three seconds!
Regarding communication: A now famous quote popped up in the 70s at many places, in my case at a university technical service center... “I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure that you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”
I didn't know anything about this accident and had assumed the first flight where MCAS activated was the accident flight. I was utterly flabbergasted to learn that the aircraft wasn't immediately grounded for a thorough technical investigation, but instead flew (and crashed) the next day.
yeah, this pretty much proves that while MCAS was a contributing factor, pilot error and failure to follow trim runaway memory items, Which is only 4 or 6 items depending on the result of item 4, was the primary cause. There is even a small fold out handle built into the trim wheel to get better leverage when trimming it manually. In both MAX crashes the pilots both turned back on the electric stab trim which is expressly prohibited after a trim runaway. Memory Item 6: STAB TRIM CUTOUT switches (both)................................................CUTOUT
@@dalgrim but MCAS is not the same as “trim run-away” A trim-runaway is when the trim wheel is spinning *continuously* without pilot’s input. MCAS activation will only move the trim wheel *intermittently* and NOT continuously like in the case of a trim runaway. MCAS activation will initially mimic the normal trim operation from the autopilot. There is NO possible cue to the pilot that MCAS was activating at all. The only sign of MCAS activation to the pilot is literally when they start seeing the ground more than he see the sky. It is absolutely unrealistic to expect pilots to immediately recognised MCAS activation as a “trim-run away” Note that MCAS activation is usually *a result of another failure* on a crucial flight data system such as pitot tube failure or AOA sensor failure, for example. The pilots are already under tremendous workload even without MCAS activation… Imagine flying while trying to figure out which airspeed readings are reliable in the cockpit after AOA sensor failure and then you start seeing more ground than the sky outside the windshield without touching any controls all the while the plane is yelling all sort of warning sounds at you.
And that they “fixed” the issue with an AoA sensor that was allowed to be off in calibration by 21 degrees. I know Peter said that was allowed, but I have no idea how. Kind of an important sensor. We aren’t talking 1 or 2 degrees off. 21 freaking degrees off.
@@DiogoOliveira-u1j Given that he was more than just a captain, I think even with the time since last command, he basically is still at a captain level lmao
He actually was not "just" a captain, he was a type rating instructor for the Boeing 737, so he taught other pilots in his airline about all the different systems a Boeing 737 and did simulator training with them. That's why he can pretty confidently judge when pilots are getting overwhelmed or what pilots might think when they did something unexpected, he observed hundreds, possibly even more than a thousand, pilots behaving in the simulator under stressful conditions. But he resigned I think last year or earlier this year to fully focus on Mentour Pilot
Thank you! As an airspace engineer, pilot and aircraft accident investigator… is great how you have treated this: factual, clear, impartial and precise….Thanks and waiting to the next video. Congrats on this great work
I lost my dad earlier this year and he loved flying. I don't know about his military career, but he flew small airplanes. He also enjoyed skydiving. Listening to this channel somehow feels like he's still here and I wish I had a bigger excitement towards airplanes.
Although the fault on the side of Boeing is now clear, it’s still shocking to me that the obviously broken plane was allowed to take off. While MCAS is the common cause for JT610 and ET302, still the systemic problem of ignoring and incorrectly repairing malfuctions is a common factor for JT610 and SJ182.
Indeed. And you can add to this Air Asia Indonesia Flight 8501 and Sriwijaya Flight 182. - It seems (at least to have) been a common aviation problem (at least) in Indonesia.
To be honest, the problem on SJ182 was not fatal at all. It was just a problem with autothrottle which can be disabled until permanent fix is implemented. The problem lies on both Pilots which failed to do their scan. How can they missed such large difference between the two thrust lever angle...
I think the worst part is how heartbreakingly close they got to preventing the fault from happening. If the lead engineer had said “You know what let’s check it here” maybe the story would’ve ended differently.
LOL -- as far as I can tell, this video posted within an hour of me getting a notice that my flight was delayed due to an equipment swap. From an A320...to a 737 MAX 8. I seriously considered downloading it to watch during the flight, but decided that would be inconsiderate of nervous fliers.
I was a production assistant intern in one of the national news channel there. I was called to assist reporting team to Tanjung Priok where the aircraft wreckage and passenger remains were collected. There were families of the victims, NTSB agents working with KNKT, all national and some international press come to cover the news, Indonesian Navy with BASARNAS sailing back and forth to the port. I can smell the deceased's belongings combined with the saltwater and hydraulic oil. Clothes, bags, torn shoes and stuffed animals. Some people from my studio even showed me a picture of a foot still intact in a shoe, the skin color is pale white. It was the most memorable and humbling day for me. I couldn't imagine what the families of the victims felt/feel and I will never understand it. I hope this video gave them peace, to understand in memory of their loved ones.
I went on my first flight one month after the Ethiopian crash and, being a nervous flyer to begin with, hearing all about MCAS and the grounding of the Max didn’t exactly help with that. It is astonishing how Boeing made so many assumptions here and added a new system without letting pilots know. That being said the Max is probably one of the safest aircraft now after the groundings and all that scrutiny. Honestly I wish I had found your channel before my flight because it has helped me overcome most of my fear of flying.
I think this is so often the case when we look back at accidents that should and could have been avoided. It’s highly frustrating that this was known about and not handled properly, angering that those who should have been certifying the aircraft shirked on their own work taking away all the oversight that was meant to be there to keep everyone safe, disgusting that profits came at the expense of safety, and heartbreaking that those who pay for it with their lives simply had nothing more that bad luck on their side. To make it worse, both accidents occurred after a documentary had been made with undercover investigative journalists having actually filmed Boeing staff saying they would never want to fly on the 787 because they wouldn’t feel safe, knowing the kind of practices that have been ongoing in the company, especially after moving production to Charleston, South Carolina where staff are not unionised and were being compared to cheap hires fresh out of a McDonald’s job. I feel like that level of reporting (done by Al Jazeera and worth a watch to all that haven’t seen it) should have been enough to trigger deeper investigation into Boeing by the FAA, but they remained complicit and, whilst it wasn’t the Dreamliner nor the lithium battery fire risk on that plane that turned out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back, it sadly felt like anything coming out of Boeing thereafter was a ticking time bomb as so much remained ignored.
Man, You beat yourself with this video. As an ex cameraman, tv&media bussines man, congrats to how you and team present this. Watch all of yours Pilot stories, and hope so, can not wait for another. Wish you all the best in new year, clear sky and more great videos. All the best from Serbian guy, from Luxembourg.
Thanks for covering this one This crash is *very* personal to me as the aircraft destination is to my hometown(yes, my Howmetown is Pangkalpinang, Bangka Belituung) And some of the passengers are peoples that my parents personally know
Love that you guys are putting credits in your videos now. So few channels do when such a large effort goes into the production work. Cheers to the entire team for making such a great channel possible.
I’ve become a real geek for civil aviation thanks to what you’re doing. I fly often, but I never used to think about all the details. Your videos sparked my interest in it, so I kept reading about it from other sources. Now, during flights and different stages of the flight, I imagine what the pilots are talking about and what settings they’re applying. And I always, always wonder if I could safely land a plane myself. With you in the cockpit, though, I’m sure I’d manage it!😅 You and your term are doing great work! Well done!
As a 737 pilot- this is by far the best and most centric explanation of the Lion Air crash- i would also challenge you to cover the Alaska Air 737M9 door failure as well which also has a similar sequence of events which would have prevented the incident. Great job as always.
Thanks Petter for this very informative video. I never knew about how many indicators were there before the accident that could have helped to avoid it. Happy to view this from Patreon, you really deserve the support for your ongoing effort and the precise technical descriptions rather than doing it the sensational way. In the end, learning to avoid mistakes in the future is what it is all about.
I really appreciate that this video wasn't just an hour or Boeing bashing. While deserved, it doesn't tell the full story. The airline and the pilots played a hand, for better or for worse. However, I will never excuse Boeing for even attempting to point the full fingers at the pilots though, let alone their hand in these accidents. This video and I presume the next fairly and proportionally holdd all the parties accountable.
Content like this is why, despite its flaws, RUclips remains my go-to platform. This is the kind of content the internet was made for - thank you to the whole team!
As per usual, the moment I see a new Mentour Pilot video, I immediately start watching without any research. I’ve made that mistake on some of these “air disaster” videos only to find it’s a fake voice, and the story is not only hard to believe, they have many facts wrong. Not so with Mentour. He’s always on point, and makes these easy to understand
This should be mandatory viewing for everyone in aviation. Despite reading the report, this adds a completely new dimension to my understanding of the accident. Outstanding production .
Wow, thanks Petter, absolutely fabulous coverage. As a very highly experienced (and now retired) captain, with nearly 30k hours and well over 12k on the 737, it was so painful to hear how the holes in the Swiss cheese slowly but surely lined up here. There were numerous chances to avoid the crash- from right at the beginning with engineering and pilot reading the previous tech log entries, and then even virtually right at the end by simply reverting to basics, setting an attitude and thrust level and of course cutting off the stab trim runaway. So sad. So avoidable. P.S. We always treated runaway Stab as ANY kind of major electric trim problem. If it’s misbehaving, do the memory checklist ie: you cut it off, period, and revert to purely manual trim- (something I have done many times in the simulator.)
Regarding your P.S. comment about the Runaway Stab Trim - YES YES YES. I DO NOT care what is causing it. You do the MEMORY ITEMS. Amazing to be these flights crashes. Totally avoidable.
Oddly i was looking for this Lion air crash mentour pilot video just two days ago. Stumbled on one video based on the preliminary report. Happy to see a fresh 2024 perspective released. Big up Petter.
Amazing job! This was an incredibly hard incident to get right, especially since the final report was so emotionally charged. I'm proud to be a member of the patreon crew.
I just was rewatching your video on the "Titanic of the Skies" (Air France Airbus stall) and here it comes a NEW VIDEO! Released 20 minutes ago! About the accident I always wanted to know about. Thank you Mentour Pilot for your hard work! ❤
I'd never flown in an aircraft until recently. Im almost 50 years old and had never really been out of Perth Western Australia that was until my partner took me to South Africa to see her family last year. I didn't tell her and probably won't but getting on that plane is was sweating bullets and truly terrified. Before we went though id seen lot's of your content and even before taking off i could hear your calming voice inside my head. This put me at ease and while i was scared the belief in the pilots and plane helped immensely. My trip to South Africa was out of this world and now i can't wait to go back.. My point is I'm incredibly grateful 🙏 for your channel putting my heart at ease. Thank you..
@@bsmith1164 As mentioned in the Video: Probably he didn´t recognized this. The Captain of the previous flight (043) had no clue about MCAS and therefore his interpretation about what was going on was that the faulty trim would only be the result of problems with the airspeed indicator ("unreliable airspeed") - and that was what he wrote down into the techlog and that was what both accident pilots thought they had to deal with, too. We must abandon our knowledge about MCAS and the following story of the 737 MAX to understand why these pilots acted as they did.
Petter - a superb examination of this critically important accident. The best thing I have seen on this for sure. Very professional production. Many congratulations to you and your team. I hope all is well with you and your family. Take good care - Paul.
The version I heard which may be more myth: An American 737Max had a similar experience at 30,000 Ft but had enough time & altitude to get out of it and reported the MCAS problem to Boeing only for the crashes to later happen & Boeing tried to throw the aircrew under the Bus even though had the previous report. Which was why the non-American Regulators took a zero tolerance approach to Boeing sitting on their hands and were going to break ranks with the FAA, forcing them into line in grounding the 737Max
@@MentourPilot I've just finished watching the whole video (it was like 11pm when you uploaded) and wow. Now I feel that when Indonesians were "relieved" that the reason why Lion Air 610 crashed was because of Boeing instead of Indonesian aviation safety regulations... they weren't fully right.
As an Indonesian I'm very happy that you do some due diligence on pronouncing the city name. Also love the details about the miscalibration of AoA sensor mentioned because I never really heard this pointed out quite clearly in mainstream media
Great video Petter as usual! The only input that I would probably give is that in Indonesian media report based on KNKT (Indonesian aviation flight safety) finding, on the previous JT043 flight, it was the jumpseat pilot that had familirarity with the trim and horizontal stabilizers problem so that he probably had saved the day for them. Shame their reporting wasn't firm enough to stop the aircraft from being grounded though
I know there has been a lot of debate around MCAS. Personally, I think it's unforgiveable that such a central flight control system wasn't documented for pilots.
Also only reading from one AoA sensor. The computer already got all the signals. Difference between a junior generalist programmer vs senior aerospace programmer.
@@phyzzip no Boeing wanted more money for 2nd AOA or something like that . The whole 737MAX program is a huge fail. This plane shouldn't have been approved at the beginning
Definitely true. As Petter explained here, there were a myriad of factors which led up to this crash from a variety of players involved. However, it's indisputable that the complete lack of explanation about MCAS was a big one.
I was in a horrid mood, youknow, one of those days where everything just goes against you. Then I see this video pop up, and my lovely girl calls me asking to meet after work. Feeling much better now❤️
I think if the aircraft has an altitude disagree warning, it should send that via the transponder as well, so ATC gets displayed a "?" instead of a wrong value.
Each transponder receives digital static pressure from an encoding altimeter which is connected to the static port and is calibrated to measure altitude when the sea level pressure is standard 29.92 in. Hg. It transmits that altitude to the ground station. It is not affected by the altimeter setting or by corrections to the altitude made by the ADIRU and is unaware of any altitude disagree detected by the display system. The ground station applies a correction for the local altimeter setting to display the true altitude of the airplane to the controller.
Every time I watch one of your videos I'm incredibly thankful for all the engineers, cabin crew, pilots and airport personnel that have made all of my flights so far as safe and fortunately uneventful as possible. At the same time, there's little which riles me up more than people not doing their job diligently when hundreds of lives depend on them. Thank you for yet another fantastic video! I've enjoyed watching it a lot and I love to learn more about aviation even though I'm always just a passenger in the back of a plane.
Thank you for explaining the situation in much more detail, Petter, and bringing this story a full explanation. It always delights me when a new video of yours appears in my notifications box!
You are right about the altitude readout being received by the controllers not being understood by pilots. But you don't quite have it right either. Transponders have blind encoders which send out signals based on pressure altitude. That is to say, they always send out altitude based on 29.92Hg. That signal is then corrected by ground equipment to display altitude to the controllers. So it doesn't matter whether your transponder is set to 1 or 2. The altitude going out is always pressure altitude, not what your altimeter displays (unless the local altimeter is 29.92). This is why controllers will sometimes ask an aircraft to verify their altimeter setting. If you are flying the correct indicated altitude, but at the wrong altimeter setting, the controller will not see what your altimeter is showing. He will see pressure altitude corrected to local pressure, which will be your actual altitude. This is a great backup that the overwhelming majority of pilots do not know about.
What do you mean "it doesn't matter whether your transponder is set to 1 or 2" ? The altitude source switch of the transponder is still selecting which of the two ADIRUs is being used as source for the pressure altitude, which obviously matters when one of them is giving erroneous values due to a faulty sensor. That's why that switch exists.
This makes another accident he talked about where the pilots set the wrong value in for their altimeter even worse then. Atc had either given the incorrect value or forgotten to update it I can't remember which but the aircraft was something like 160 ft lower then the pilots thought it was and resulted in them hitting tree tops if I'm remembering the correct video and then landing short of the runway after their engines failed from ingesting leaves and branches. This could have been avoided if there were a procedure requiring the pilots to call out their altitude at some point and for ATC to verify or correct it using the information from the transponder.
Your videos are always precise and well researched but this is the best I think. The Swiss cheese model yet again. Designers can never account for all scenarios but IMHO a system as powerful as this relying on a single input and to cap it all unknown to the drivers just should not have got anywhere near certification. Follow the ……….
@@jfb7201I recently watched this episode. The controller gave the wrong setting. He realized it a couple seconds afterward and gave out the correct one. But his transmission was blocked and the pilots never heard it.
This is something i have a real hard spot with in a lot of heavily automated systems. And you don't get a lot more automated that a modern cockpit. A fault is only useful if you know how that fault is generated. A self test is only good if you know what the self test is actually testing. I service products my company makes, and quite a lot of the faults aren't explained in the manual AT ALL. Nor are the self tests. The equipment is very good, no problems there, but it's much harder to troubleshoot when you have to guess how the fault codes are generated, and how the self test routines generate those faults. This is a real problem for maintenance people, and too many just think "hey, it passed the diagnostics, must be good!" That is incorrect thinking, and leads to a lot of failures being worse than they should have been.
In the Case of Lion Air Flight 610 Maintainence struggled unsuccesfully with the ongoing problems of this aircraft, even long before the accident sequence started, and their performance was really questionable. Not knowing about an important technical feature made it even worse, too. But way before it ended in the Java Sea it seems as if this aircraft was at no point of its two-month-existence really able to fly without fault messages and alarms. The question is therefore: What would you do if you get a product with such stuff? Sent it back to the manufacturer? Maybe this would have been the best decision for Lion Air.
Happy to see a new, very ethical sponsor of your latest videos. I'm not a pilot, but an engineering enthusiast - and I appreciate how you're spreading such high level information through the Internet. Your videos are the highlights of the best education can ever be given remotely. Thank you Mentour Pilot, and have my gratitude and appreciation. Greetings, Anthony
This is the best and most complete report of Lion Air 610 I’ve ever seen. After I viewed the Netflix ‘Documentary, I wondered if the producers of that vid even read the NTSB reports.
Another great engaging video. Thanks again Petter and your team for these. I would love a T-shirt with the phrase "Remember that." Everytime I hear that, that point sticks. Love it
At last, this incident. I take this opportunity to congratulate you (and now your expended team) for what is some of the best content on YT. From listening to the concerns of your subscribers to producing important content without any sensationalism, click baiting or controversy harvesting, your channel fills the of void of serious and professional aviation safety education. All the best!
This is heartbreaking. It sounds like the captain, sick and not at his best, was basically alone in the cockpit of a faulty aircraft. The odds were stacked against him. The first officer should not have been allowed to fly as in any emergency he would be no help at all, doubling the captains work load, especially compared to any competent first officer
Ahh I'm so glad you're covering these accidents, I've been looking forward to your take ❤ The contrast between the accident flight and a different crew experiencing the same fault the day before was so interesting and added so much context. Like two different swiss cheese slices. I can tell how much you care about getting this right, I appreciate your thoughtfulness and attention to detail so much. Thank you ❤ I'll be back to rewatch this tomorrow, and already looking forward to the next one.
The captain actually adhered to "aviate, navigate, communicate". The first officer seemed so clueless in this situation, that trying to explain the situation would have been a waste of time and mental capacity.
What was probably what the Captain thought when the FO was unable to find the Airspeed-Unreliable-Checklist for minutes. But in this case he shouldn´t have handed over the controls to him.
I kind of feel like this crashed could have been avoided if captain didn't hand over control to the FO, but maybe during the stress of the moment captain didn't notice that FO didn't have the mental capacity to fly the plane. It must have been very stressful situation.
@MentourPilot i don't know if this is the intention of your channel. But since i started watching your videos I'm no longer a nervous flyer. 😁😁 You're the best✌️
I never had the full story on this crash. The news media usually just reported that it was a failure in crew training, or MCAS was a new advanced stall recovery system that Boeing didn't give training for, etc. What is very unique about this accident report is we got to see how two different crews handled the same issue, with very different, and deadly, outcomes for the less able crew, highlighting the incredible importance of crew training and strict checkouts. Often, we only get the perspective of the crew that (mis)handled a complex situation, but we were able to see exactly how this situation should be handled. Except, somehow, the issue wasn't actually solved and the aircraft ended up under the command of less able airmen. Thank you for this incredibly detailed dive into one of the most avoidable disasters of modern aviation.
This whole sequence of events was more complex than I realized. I didn't know how big a role the maintenance played, or that the earlier flight had the same issue but was able to correct it... and then didn't tell the next crew how. I've always thought that the best kind of rules are the ones you're given a good explanation for, and the more I watch this channel, the more right I think I am about that. Excellent stuff, truly. Top-tier, not just for the RUclipss, but for media in general. Incredible work.
3:32 Airbus 737-900?😂 great video! I like these longer form documentary style videos. The attention to detail in these videos, and the production style is incredible. Great job to you and your team!
I'm so glad you included the previous flight as well; it was so helpful to see how even with the exact same problem, different handling and awareness could make such a difference in the outcome!
What an incredible video! At first I thought "What's left to be told about this accident?". Not the least, as a Patreon to the channel, I should have known much better. Kind thx to the entire Mentour team for this Herculean work of a video! Can't wait for what's coming up next!
The fact that the crew were able to manage three checklists at the same time and got that far in such pressure is genuinely impressive and even more tragic for the future flights ALSO YOUR VID QUALITY KEEPS GOING UP EVERY WEEK THIS IS AMAZING
I find your videos to be so very informative and well made and probably what i like most is how you explain everything. It really makes the difference if you're coming here as someone who might be passionate about aviation but does not know too much info on it or how things work. Keep up the good work Peter and the team!
I’m happy to see this video. Especially given your previous employer and your experience with these planes, I feared you might avoid them. Respect and thanks for doing what you do, Petter.
1 hour video feels like 10minutes! Great job! It perfectly explains how systems and teams work and how accidents happen when the whole system fails without anyone raising a red flag. Best explainer video over!
The number of information screwups and human, mechanical and software failures that had to line up for this disaster is startling. It really is incredible. So many places where a small thing could have been done to prevent it. Yet it seemed almost unstoppable. Truly fantastic work analyzing it. As has become your standard. 😊👍👍
I'm looking forward to your CRM course, whenever it comes out. A recurring lesson from your videos has always been the importance of clear, decisive and calm communication between team members, and I feel it's a perfect lesson that extends beyond the airline industry itself. Leadership situations, relationship situations, family squabbles...all resolved with this. Excited already, talking about this. Thanks for another thorough video.
OooF! Well done Petter! My stomach was clenching at the end! Thank you for explaining why the system kept activating. That was one of the missing pieces in my understanding! I did not understand how you could go from single invocation to "Full Authority" without someone (a design engineer?) saying "Hang on! STOP!" Now I understand it was the retriggering that made it so! I do think in the penultimate flight the presence of a third pilot in the jump seat was also crucial! Thank you for such great content!
Indeed. While on the Crash Flight the Captain flew the aircraft in a kind of a single pilot because his First Officer was not competent enough to deal with such a situation.
As an avid MentourPilot and MentourNow viewer who watched every video and also saw for example Petter's interview about MCAS on the ColdFusion channel, I thought I basically knew everything about this Lion Air flight already and this would be just repetition for me... but this couldn't be further from the truth. I had no idea (or at least no memory) how the crew of the flight the day before could successfully handle the issue and I wasn't aware how much of an impact the lack of CRM and the pilot's skills had on this accident. So thank you very much Petter for really covering everything about this flight, not just MCAS and Boeing's fault! 🙏 This finally pushed me over the edge to become a Patreon, even though I don't have and never had anything to do with the aviation industry. I just think these videos are super interesting and the world needs more education like this about all sorts of topics (IT-Security and how hacks happen would be another I can think of where the public has a very warped perception about what makes a system secure)
Thank you Petter, I learned so many new details about this accident despite the massive coverage that was already out there. This is a top tier documentary. If I may suggest one thing: I much prefer the more minimalistic music used in your videos about 1-2 years ago, the one in your newer ones doesn't always fit your otherwise so appropriate tone.
Peter...I want you and you team to know the impact tbese videos have had on me and my team. Im a professional firearms trainer here in the US and im the administrator for a state run shooting facility. Ive implemented CRM team building exercises with great success as well as teaching my team about the"swiss cheese" model. Last month we saw record usage for our program and we've received tnousands of 5 star google ratings with the majority of them commenting positively on our attention to safety and the professionalism of our crew. I want to extend a sincere thank you to you and your team for how thoroughly you explain these concepts and the importance they have in maintaining a safe and efficient environment in which to operate. Looking forward to many more years of these fantastic videos. Im also a huge aviation nerd. I have exactly 11 hours of flight experience, but who knows.... maybe one day..
Whenever I go back home to Indonesia, we never fly Lion Air. They just have a very bad rep, and that’s well before the Max accident. This documentary just confirms that. Thanks as always for your thorough investigation and for giving us all this information.
They had a bad reputation but they were mostly recovered when this happened. And before they got the MAX in their fleet, they actually inquired with Boeing about training their pilots in the sim for it... and Boeing said "no".
As a young aviation enthusiast and having a dream of becoming a pilot, i have learned A LOT from these kind of videos and i am truly grateful that i have found Peter's Chanel to take me through all the details and complexities that pilots have to deal with!!❤❤
Superb as always, my second favorite after your video about MH370. But I can’t deny this perfect in-depth research gives me more sadness about this accident… and more anger too. May they rest in peace.
I fly to and from work and Have been watching your channel since 2019 I always pretend your the pilot and your wife is the flight attendant after watching all these years Im not as stressed when we enter turbulence !😮 Thank you so much You were born for this !! God Bless Merry Christmas 🔔🎄🎁 to you and your family from USA
I think it's fantastic that you've started running credits at the beginning of the program! These videos have such high production quality so it's fitting to see Dom's and the rest of the team's names on screen.
The combination of the simulated flight footage, professional opinion, and the very comprehensive breakdown makes this the best “Aviation accident” channel. IMO.
Nicely made. I feel like the general aviation community and people in general should be talking about Boeing's mistakes as much as possible as well as holding them accountable for all the lives lost.
Absolutely should, there is a history to this sort of stuff (like the hard over scenario issue in the past). And obviously with the recent build quality problems, boeing needs to stop putting profit over safety and the FAA need to get out of boeings pocket.
a friend of mine was on the plane during its Bali to Jakarta flight. he told me after he landed that he was nervous the whole flight. i can only imagine what he felt and thought after he reached home and watched the news later...
Petter, @30:15 you say that even though none of the checklists for the 3 issues the pilots were confronted with advised “landing at the closest available airport”, that it would be “OK” to do so, and in fact you would “dare say that would be the best thing to do”. Have you ever gone “against standard procedures” or improvised and implemented a course of action that you knew would be questioned? If so, I think we’d all like to hear about it; what you did and what were the repercussions of those charged in investigating the incident. Great video, thanks.
You explain everything so well I am a complete novice in all of this but I have started watching your videos and really got to understand more about different topics related to aviation and the tragic and unfortunate accidents. Thank you for your work and bringing knowledge and understanding to us.
Are you truly fully informed? Go to ground.news/mentourpilot to compare news from around the world and gain a deeper understanding of every story on Aviation and more. Subscribe for 50% off unlimited access for a limited time.
Did Petter just send a heart to his own message? Petter please say hi to my son Jared and make his day. Thanks in advance
24:35 - I had to play the 'Petter Shaker' twice! 😂 Hilarious graphics to illustrate the Stick Shaker! 😂
Could you also do Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 as well? Ethiopian Airlines had trained their pilots on the emergency procedure for MCAS after Lion Air but the procedure didn’t work.
Edit: Never mind. You said it will be your next video. Hopefully, you can clarify some things on this one since the NTSB and BEA reports seem to think that the pilots are to blame as well even though they followed the correct procedure and Boeing never mentioned the role that speed would play in turning off MCAS.
@31:12 Could that be due to training that every switch you throw while using the plane has to be set back to standard before handing off the plane?
For locomotives that is how we do - and then we report (and thus make it visible to other train drivers) the issues and what might have caused it, this way it can be investigated by the technicians.
Oh wait - he forgot key issues and descriptions - that's why...
These deserve to be aired on primetime TV, production is far far better than anything I've seen on. It's factually correct too! Great job Petter!
Thank you Samuel! Let me know what you think when you have finished watching it as well.
@MentourPilot for sure!! Will be watching it this evening 😁
I think maybe it’s abit too technical for general tv but it’s definitely higher in quality than a lot of tv shows :)
@@Moon_x_sun it depends on which channel it's televised I guess, you see these aircraft investigations or 3 part specials that are just as long. Either way, we love to see the content 😁!
@@samueldennis8343 that’s probably true I just feel like in general tv they usually explain things in even simpler terms than Petter (he is still good at explaining tho just doesn’t “over” explain as much) :) I agree tho it’s great content he makes and I love watching it
My lyft driver yesterday told me he’s beginning his training as a commercial pilot soon. I got to geek out about this channel to him and about how helpful it’s been to me from the passenger/general educational side. I hope he checks it out.
That mustve been a fun ride!
He’s going to have to learn that you can’t completely disregard the rules in order to make up time.
He’s going from Lyft to lift
I hope you felt safe in the car :)
I hope you weren’t riding during his period of circadian low
I've never seen any science or documentary videos like these. You've set a bar so high I find it hard to put into words. The level of respect and sensitivity to the people involved, the lack of exploitation of tragedy, the skill of making science understandable yet fully accurate, and the engagement with the audience. I hope others will learn from you. I'm able to let my kids watch these and know they are going to learn science, respect, and not develop fears.
Thank you.
You summarized it better than I ever could.
Agreed. This one is a stunner.
@@knightmarecityk What you said. 100%
U can check also mayday: air crash investigation or disaster
@@gabipascu5388we're all here because we can't deal with the dramatization and nonsense from those exact shows
I remember when this and the Ethiopian crashes first happened, one of my first questions was "has an erroneous MCAS activation ever been dealt with successfully?" And the answer here is quite shocking, that it was done on the accident aircraft literally the flight before the accident flight. Awesome job as usual
yes. it's too bad though that Boeing had completely hidden MCAS from pilots because even though the crew successfully dealt with the MCAS problem on the flight before this one, they didn't know the real cause, didn't know about MCAS and the fact that it was a faulty AOA sensor (and a horrifically poor and dangerous design of MCAS) that caused the problem.
@@pimacanyon6208 Indeed. It seems as if even the Captain of the previous flight thought therefore that something with the airspeed indicator would cause the problem, resulting in not notifying the trim issues he had faced, what caused then the accident crew to be totally startled when the problems reoccured.
You simply can´t fix a problem when you don´t know what is causing it.
@@pimacanyon6208 Guess what is hidden on page 748 of the System Differences Manual. You should think about checking before taking your guess.
@@NicolaW72 exactly
@@pimacanyon6208 but do you really think the crew would have dealt with it even if they knew? They failed basic memory actions
This reminds me of an old programming joke.
A programmer, a systems analyst, and an hardware engineer are car-sharing to get to work. During the commute the brakes on the car fail. The driver manages to stop the car before it crashes and the three colleagues get out to discuss what to do next. The hardware engineer says "We should tear down the braking system, find the fault, and fix it." The systems analyst disagrees and says "No, we should diagnose the issue using the maintenance manual. Once we know what could be causing the failure, we can go right to the correct system and fix it!" The programmer listens in horror and says "Look the car is clearly not showing any problems right now. Let's just get back in and drive to see if the problem reoccurs."
LOL
The interesting thing about that is how often faults do occur on a hardware level, but are assumed to be occurring on a software level. And since we have less and less people these days that are capable of understanding hardware and have not been trained on it, often the default approach is to fix the software. And once no faults are found, they proceed. Very scary stuff.
@@mediocreman2IMO a contributing factor to less and less people understanding hardwares is the hardwares we use today get more and more complex especially with a complex machine like airplane.
Honestly this and similar stories are baffling to me; they are struggling to maintain pitch, the main/strongest determinant of pitch is the trim, yet they don't actually discuss (captain) or realize (FO) the trim abnormalities while pulling at crazy high pounds of pressure. Bizarre. And happened many times with different variations.
@@SR-xv8de I think the main reason is that they couldn't see the exact value of trim position on the screen. And they had no time to look at it in hardware. So if you're not aware it could get worse by itself, you won't do any large corrections to the value. It looked more like the vertical stabilizer was going to break soon because of their 'trim up' corrections.
During lectures when my professor shares his screen I can see his RUclips and it’s often paused on a mentour pilot video
Awesomeness
Thankfully not PornHub!
that's funny. What subject is your professor teaching?
@@pimacanyon6208 human factors in aviation
@@pimacanyon6208 Humans and Aviation. Mostly about the pilot error and accident model aspect of commercial aviation
I have a short attention span and typically struggle to watch videos over 10 minutes or so, but when I see a Mentour video that's over an hour long, I know I can eagerly and attentively watch the whole thing in one sitting.
That’s great to hear!
Same here!!!
Mentour's diction is so good, that listening at 1.25x speed s never a problem, even when multitasking.
you need a 2nd screen and a gaming addiction.. you think I sit here for an hour paying attention lel.. background noise
Ditto
As a software engineer, it never ceases to amaze me how, albeit in a much lower severity level, of course, a lot of the factors that contribute to these accidents can be correlated with incidents in my field of work: design flaws, environmental factors, under-training, poor communication, deviation normalization, confirmation bias, subtle incapacitation, the Swiss cheese model, you name it. I can say your videos really help me to be better at my job by knowing these factors and trying my best to overcome them as they arise. Thanks a lot!
Ahhh…Swiss Cheese!
Another fan of Hoover!
This is because most management see information technology in general and software development in particular as a cost, not a benefit. Therefore the work is given to the lowest bidder. The fact their entire business and their reputation is in the hands of said low-bidders never enters their tiny minds.
@@Ira88881That’s not a Hoover thing, dude.
@@pisymbol Yeah, to be honest I didn't know about the existence of this dude until Ira88881's comment.
Same! (Software engineer here as well)
Airline Pilot and former mechanic at a major airline here. Mentour my deepest respect to you and your team for such a well documented and narrated story from both the technical and professional side. I learned a lot from watching this one!! Thanks
I wonder how often a brand new part and one of the major sensors at that, can be faulty.
Software developer here. You and other aviation channels have influenced my day-to-day professional understanding quite a bit.
Also as a software dev, I see many of the same mix of human + system failures in my own working world. Though in my business that usually just means someone’s order gets stuffed up, rather than a plane crashing.
As with any computer, "garbage in, garbage out"!
@@Georgiagreen317 I use the acronym SISO.
(not to be confused with sisu, which is a very positive thing, when genuinely suomi that is. And I say that as ruotsalainen.)
@@bodan1196 what is the acronym siso?
@@Tamyrk Same as "garbage in, garbage out", but with a less polite four letter word instead of garbage. Starting with 's', ending with 'it'.
@@bodan1196 LMFAO
Considering you got criticism (and to an extent rightly so) every time you had a betterhelp sponsorship, I think more thanks should be given to you now that you no longer take sponsorships from them.
Thank you
Why are you still bringing that up 🙄
He should be thanked for stopping doing harm. Weird take.
What’s betterhelp?
@@pjaypender1009 hes being thanked for listening and doing something about it.
I want you to know I actually use these videos for leadership training at my job at a steel mill. It may not seem related, but I've found major benefits discussing CRM style leadership with my people, and I have seen benefits to it. Thank you from America!
Im so happy to hear that as I’m working on creating just a course like that
@@MentourPilot When I worked in care, I encouraged this kind of thing before I even knew what 'CRM' was, as it seemed like the best thing since sliced bread to do. It absolutely had a positive effect. It is great you are doing a CRM course like that, it is a game changing concept for many areas and walks of life. UA232s example is probably my favourite successful use of CRM to point out.
@@MentourPilotyou've been instrumental in helping me pass my interviews for the nuclear sector. Thank you Petter & team!
@@MentourPilotthat’s super cool. I for one would be very interested in taking this course for me and my team! We work in a creative field without real risks like this but still so useful.
Same here, although my work is way less meaningful. I adopt the leadership and good CRM practices to make a healthier work environment for my team, and Petter has become a landmark of those qualities to me.
As a former stewardess for Icelandair for many years without any serious incidents I find your videos terrifying and exhilarating at the same time. It is like looking at horror movie and not being able to stop looking. I love your calm voice and Norwegian accent. Thank your for all your hard work on this.
Thank you for watching!! (And the accent is Swedish 😉)
With a Spanish twang!!😅
I flew a lot shorter than you and still I agree.
CRM can safe so much but knowledge is required for it.
@@MentourPilot oh ok sorry for the confusion. I lived in Sweden (Kalmar) for few years in the ´70 - Love Beautiful Sweden.
@@iceprincessone7168 Kalmar isn't what it used to be!
I really love your videos. I loved Mayday episodes but they were over dramatic. Yours are so much better. Sending a thanks here since I'm from India and Patreon doesn't accept UPI yet
Damn, one of your best videos so far!
I was quite familiar with the uncommanded MCAS activations on this flight, but I had no idea a crew the day before faced the exact same problems and didn't crash.
It's amazing how 2 different crews can be all that stands between a minor inconvenience and a fatal accident.
Great work by you and your team!
and they dont talk to each other...very FRIGID. ARROGANT.
I work in Cyber Security, and see a lot of similarities between how we are supposed to handle CRM type issues during incidents. I have definitely improved my professional capabilities when it comes to incident response coordination and communication from watching your videos.
One of the major issues we see in my field is people assuming another party knows what they are referencing with unspecific communication, similar to in this incident, although thankfully none have been serious enough to cost people their lives in my career.
Thank you from Denmark for the great content!
Thanks for that. I work in a similar field and I over-communicate now because I see how poor communication is in the cockpit sometimes and I am convinced that my coworkers and the vendors that I work with must think I am thick in the head because I always clarify things that are not clear to all parties. And even though nobody really says it out loud I know things have gone much, much better because of that clarity among all parties.
@@mediocreman2 In this case the difference what Boeing assumed and what actually happened was simply crazy: Boeing (or Boeing´s software experts) assumed that the Pilots would identify the failure within three seconds (!) as a Trim runaway and would then immediately take the correct procedure to solve the problem. In fact the first crew identified the problem after more than two minutes and only caused by the Good Luck that they had a third Pilot on the Jump Seat in the Cockpit, who had experience with this Aircraft model and from his position a better view onto the Trim Wheels than the two Pilots in the front seats. The second crew identified the problem at no point of their 12-minutes-flight.
@@NicolaW72 As a layman it just seems impossible to believe that Boeing were so overconfident in MCAS that they didn't even bother testing it enough to figure these issues out. They've got blood on their hands now (if it bothers them, that is)
@@guestguest9603 It is indeed the question if they at Boeing really believed what they stated: That the Pilots were able to identify the problem within three seconds!
Regarding communication: A now famous quote popped up in the 70s at many places, in my case at a university technical service center...
“I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure that you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”
I didn't know anything about this accident and had assumed the first flight where MCAS activated was the accident flight. I was utterly flabbergasted to learn that the aircraft wasn't immediately grounded for a thorough technical investigation, but instead flew (and crashed) the next day.
Yep, there is a lot of things people didn’t know about this flight
yeah, this pretty much proves that while MCAS was a contributing factor, pilot error and failure to follow trim runaway memory items, Which is only 4 or 6 items depending on the result of item 4, was the primary cause. There is even a small fold out handle built into the trim wheel to get better leverage when trimming it manually. In both MAX crashes the pilots both turned back on the electric stab trim which is expressly prohibited after a trim runaway. Memory Item 6: STAB TRIM CUTOUT switches (both)................................................CUTOUT
Same here, I didn't know about the first successfully mitigated issue
@@dalgrim but MCAS is not the same as “trim run-away”
A trim-runaway is when the trim wheel is spinning *continuously* without pilot’s input.
MCAS activation will only move the trim wheel *intermittently* and NOT continuously like in the case of a trim runaway.
MCAS activation will initially mimic the normal trim operation from the autopilot. There is NO possible cue to the pilot that MCAS was activating at all.
The only sign of MCAS activation to the pilot is literally when they start seeing the ground more than he see the sky.
It is absolutely unrealistic to expect pilots to immediately recognised MCAS activation as a “trim-run away”
Note that MCAS activation is usually *a result of another failure* on a crucial flight data system such as pitot tube failure or AOA sensor failure, for example.
The pilots are already under tremendous workload even without MCAS activation…
Imagine flying while trying to figure out which airspeed readings are reliable in the cockpit after AOA sensor failure and then you start seeing more ground than the sky outside the windshield without touching any controls all the while the plane is yelling all sort of warning sounds at you.
And that they “fixed” the issue with an AoA sensor that was allowed to be off in calibration by 21 degrees. I know Peter said that was allowed, but I have no idea how. Kind of an important sensor. We aren’t talking 1 or 2 degrees off. 21 freaking degrees off.
This guy is an airline captain, but still does this intense research for us. What a pilot!
He is not airlines captain anymore. He resigned from Ryanair
@@DiogoOliveira-u1j Given that he was more than just a captain, I think even with the time since last command, he basically is still at a captain level lmao
He actually was not "just" a captain, he was a type rating instructor for the Boeing 737, so he taught other pilots in his airline about all the different systems a Boeing 737 and did simulator training with them. That's why he can pretty confidently judge when pilots are getting overwhelmed or what pilots might think when they did something unexpected, he observed hundreds, possibly even more than a thousand, pilots behaving in the simulator under stressful conditions.
But he resigned I think last year or earlier this year to fully focus on Mentour Pilot
If you think there isn't a team behind this then you're mistaken
@ThomasIsBored Sure, there must be a team but it's still no easy task doing what he does.
Thank you! As an airspace engineer, pilot and aircraft accident investigator… is great how you have treated this: factual, clear, impartial and precise….Thanks and waiting to the next video. Congrats on this great work
I lost my dad earlier this year and he loved flying. I don't know about his military career, but he flew small airplanes. He also enjoyed skydiving. Listening to this channel somehow feels like he's still here and I wish I had a bigger excitement towards airplanes.
sorry for your loss :(
Although the fault on the side of Boeing is now clear, it’s still shocking to me that the obviously broken plane was allowed to take off. While MCAS is the common cause for JT610 and ET302, still the systemic problem of ignoring and incorrectly repairing malfuctions is a common factor for JT610 and SJ182.
Correct.. things are Always more complicated than they seem
Indeed. And you can add to this Air Asia Indonesia Flight 8501 and Sriwijaya Flight 182. - It seems (at least to have) been a common aviation problem (at least) in Indonesia.
To be honest, the problem on SJ182 was not fatal at all. It was just a problem with autothrottle which can be disabled until permanent fix is implemented. The problem lies on both Pilots which failed to do their scan. How can they missed such large difference between the two thrust lever angle...
I think the worst part is how heartbreakingly close they got to preventing the fault from happening. If the lead engineer had said “You know what let’s check it here” maybe the story would’ve ended differently.
Where was the test flight? Why would that not be mandatory for these types of automated systems?
You dropped this just as I'm about to board a 10 hour flight. I don't care, I downloaded it to watch during the flight!
Have a good trip!
Where to
I did same thing two weeks ago lol, while going to Tenerife, video was about accident on Tenerife too
Reminds me of the in-flight movie from "Airplane".
LOL -- as far as I can tell, this video posted within an hour of me getting a notice that my flight was delayed due to an equipment swap. From an A320...to a 737 MAX 8.
I seriously considered downloading it to watch during the flight, but decided that would be inconsiderate of nervous fliers.
3:32 ‘airbus 737-900 er’ cracked me up. Great content
Yeah😂 probably an error
Video editor will be getting email from Petter
There will be an investigation of this tragedy and Petter will wait on the final report to post a video about this😂
Wait, what am I missing? afaik that’s what they (Lion Air) actually call it.
@@lokifrostpaw2976 Really? They called it an *airbus* 737?
I was a production assistant intern in one of the national news channel there. I was called to assist reporting team to Tanjung Priok where the aircraft wreckage and passenger remains were collected. There were families of the victims, NTSB agents working with KNKT, all national and some international press come to cover the news, Indonesian Navy with BASARNAS sailing back and forth to the port. I can smell the deceased's belongings combined with the saltwater and hydraulic oil. Clothes, bags, torn shoes and stuffed animals. Some people from my studio even showed me a picture of a foot still intact in a shoe, the skin color is pale white. It was the most memorable and humbling day for me. I couldn't imagine what the families of the victims felt/feel and I will never understand it. I hope this video gave them peace, to understand in memory of their loved ones.
I can feel how traumatic this experience must have been.🙏
I went on my first flight one month after the Ethiopian crash and, being a nervous flyer to begin with, hearing all about MCAS and the grounding of the Max didn’t exactly help with that. It is astonishing how Boeing made so many assumptions here and added a new system without letting pilots know. That being said the Max is probably one of the safest aircraft now after the groundings and all that scrutiny. Honestly I wish I had found your channel before my flight because it has helped me overcome most of my fear of flying.
Yes, I think you are right and thank you for your nice feedback
Max does not stand in the same league as A321neo though. None of the Boeings do. They made way too many shortcuts.
The Ethiopian one crashed about 100 miles off of where I live and the fact that it could've been prevented both times pisses me off
Yeah.. it’s quite frustrating
Muslims talking about accident prevention ☠️☠️☠️
@@rex77xyou aren’t serious
I think this is so often the case when we look back at accidents that should and could have been avoided. It’s highly frustrating that this was known about and not handled properly, angering that those who should have been certifying the aircraft shirked on their own work taking away all the oversight that was meant to be there to keep everyone safe, disgusting that profits came at the expense of safety, and heartbreaking that those who pay for it with their lives simply had nothing more that bad luck on their side.
To make it worse, both accidents occurred after a documentary had been made with undercover investigative journalists having actually filmed Boeing staff saying they would never want to fly on the 787 because they wouldn’t feel safe, knowing the kind of practices that have been ongoing in the company, especially after moving production to Charleston, South Carolina where staff are not unionised and were being compared to cheap hires fresh out of a McDonald’s job. I feel like that level of reporting (done by Al Jazeera and worth a watch to all that haven’t seen it) should have been enough to trigger deeper investigation into Boeing by the FAA, but they remained complicit and, whilst it wasn’t the Dreamliner nor the lithium battery fire risk on that plane that turned out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back, it sadly felt like anything coming out of Boeing thereafter was a ticking time bomb as so much remained ignored.
@@thegreyarea-WPP Indeed, exactly.
Man, You beat yourself with this video. As an ex cameraman, tv&media bussines man, congrats to how you and team present this. Watch all of yours Pilot stories, and hope so, can not wait for another. Wish you all the best in new year, clear sky and more great videos. All the best from Serbian guy, from Luxembourg.
Thank you so much for that feedback!! It means a lot, coming from a cameraman!
Thanks for covering this one
This crash is *very* personal to me as the aircraft destination is to my hometown(yes, my Howmetown is Pangkalpinang, Bangka Belituung)
And some of the passengers are peoples that my parents personally know
Love that you guys are putting credits in your videos now. So few channels do when such a large effort goes into the production work. Cheers to the entire team for making such a great channel possible.
I’ve become a real geek for civil aviation thanks to what you’re doing. I fly often, but I never used to think about all the details.
Your videos sparked my interest in it, so I kept reading about it from other sources. Now, during flights and different stages of the flight, I imagine what the pilots are talking about and what settings they’re applying.
And I always, always wonder if I could safely land a plane myself. With you in the cockpit, though, I’m sure I’d manage it!😅
You and your term are doing great work! Well done!
As a 737 pilot- this is by far the best and most centric explanation of the Lion Air crash- i would also challenge you to cover the Alaska Air 737M9 door failure as well which also has a similar sequence of events which would have prevented the incident. Great job as always.
Thank you!
He covered it already i think :) wasnt it 1208?
Nevermind it´s 1282 but he did actually cover it 9 months ago
Thanks Petter for this very informative video. I never knew about how many indicators were there before the accident that could have helped to avoid it. Happy to view this from Patreon, you really deserve the support for your ongoing effort and the precise technical descriptions rather than doing it the sensational way. In the end, learning to avoid mistakes in the future is what it is all about.
I really appreciate that this video wasn't just an hour or Boeing bashing. While deserved, it doesn't tell the full story. The airline and the pilots played a hand, for better or for worse. However, I will never excuse Boeing for even attempting to point the full fingers at the pilots though, let alone their hand in these accidents.
This video and I presume the next fairly and proportionally holdd all the parties accountable.
This has been my favorite RUclips channel for about four years now, and this video is one of the best. You have changed how I look at Aviation.
That makes me so happy to hear!
Content like this is why, despite its flaws, RUclips remains my go-to platform. This is the kind of content the internet was made for - thank you to the whole team!
As per usual, the moment I see a new Mentour Pilot video, I immediately start watching without any research.
I’ve made that mistake on some of these “air disaster” videos only to find it’s a fake voice, and the story is not only hard to believe, they have many facts wrong.
Not so with Mentour. He’s always on point, and makes these easy to understand
I like that you are doing credits right there in the video, Petter. Good job, you and the team!
Thank you!
This should be mandatory viewing for everyone in aviation. Despite reading the report, this adds a completely new dimension to my understanding of the accident. Outstanding production .
Wow, thanks Petter, absolutely fabulous coverage.
As a very highly experienced (and now retired) captain, with nearly 30k hours and well over 12k on the 737, it was so painful to hear how the holes in the Swiss cheese slowly but surely lined up here.
There were numerous chances to avoid the crash- from right at the beginning with engineering and pilot reading the previous tech log entries, and then even virtually right at the end by simply reverting to basics, setting an attitude and thrust level and of course cutting off the stab trim runaway.
So sad. So avoidable.
P.S. We always treated runaway Stab as ANY kind of major electric trim problem. If it’s misbehaving, do the memory checklist ie: you cut it off, period, and revert to purely manual trim- (something I have done many times in the simulator.)
Regarding your P.S. comment about the Runaway Stab Trim - YES YES YES. I DO NOT care what is causing it. You do the MEMORY ITEMS. Amazing to be these flights crashes. Totally avoidable.
Absolute BEST description of this accident I have seen. Completely understandable, even to non pilots.
Oddly i was looking for this Lion air crash mentour pilot video just two days ago. Stumbled on one video based on the preliminary report. Happy to see a fresh 2024 perspective released. Big up Petter.
Amazing job! This was an incredibly hard incident to get right, especially since the final report was so emotionally charged.
I'm proud to be a member of the patreon crew.
I just was rewatching your video on the "Titanic of the Skies" (Air France Airbus stall) and here it comes a NEW VIDEO! Released 20 minutes ago! About the accident I always wanted to know about. Thank you Mentour Pilot for your hard work! ❤
I'd never flown in an aircraft until recently. Im almost 50 years old and had never really been out of Perth Western Australia that was until my partner took me to South Africa to see her family last year. I didn't tell her and probably won't but getting on that plane is was sweating bullets and truly terrified. Before we went though id seen lot's of your content and even before taking off i could hear your calming voice inside my head. This put me at ease and while i was scared the belief in the pilots and plane helped immensely.
My trip to South Africa was out of this world and now i can't wait to go back..
My point is I'm incredibly grateful 🙏 for your channel putting my heart at ease. Thank you..
It’s also crazy that one crew were able to deal with the problem easily and the other went in the ocean
I'm perplexed that the Captain didn't clearly state that the trim was fighting him and have a discussion about what to do.
@@bsmith1164 As mentioned in the Video: Probably he didn´t recognized this. The Captain of the previous flight (043) had no clue about MCAS and therefore his interpretation about what was going on was that the faulty trim would only be the result of problems with the airspeed indicator ("unreliable airspeed") - and that was what he wrote down into the techlog and that was what both accident pilots thought they had to deal with, too.
We must abandon our knowledge about MCAS and the following story of the 737 MAX to understand why these pilots acted as they did.
Petter - a superb examination of this critically important accident. The best thing I have seen on this for sure. Very professional production. Many congratulations to you and your team. I hope all is well with you and your family. Take good care - Paul.
As one of your Patreon crew, I am not surprised at how thorough and thought-prooking thiis is, I am glad to support the work you do!
You’re right thiis really is thought-prooking
@@WAFC Careful that you are not prooking anger with your comment.
A deep dive on not just MCAS, but everything else? A rare gem!
That’s what I was trying to do..
The version I heard which may be more myth:
An American 737Max had a similar experience at 30,000 Ft but had enough time & altitude to get out of it
and reported the MCAS problem to Boeing only for the crashes to later happen & Boeing tried to throw the
aircrew under the Bus even though had the previous report.
Which was why the non-American Regulators took a zero tolerance approach to Boeing sitting on their hands
and were going to break ranks with the FAA, forcing them into line in grounding the 737Max
@@MentourPilot I've just finished watching the whole video (it was like 11pm when you uploaded) and wow. Now I feel that when Indonesians were "relieved" that the reason why Lion Air 610 crashed was because of Boeing instead of Indonesian aviation safety regulations... they weren't fully right.
As an Indonesian I'm very happy that you do some due diligence on pronouncing the city name. Also love the details about the miscalibration of AoA sensor mentioned because I never really heard this pointed out quite clearly in mainstream media
Great video Petter as usual! The only input that I would probably give is that in Indonesian media report based on KNKT (Indonesian aviation flight safety) finding, on the previous JT043 flight, it was the jumpseat pilot that had familirarity with the trim and horizontal stabilizers problem so that he probably had saved the day for them. Shame their reporting wasn't firm enough to stop the aircraft from being grounded though
Indeed.
I know there has been a lot of debate around MCAS. Personally, I think it's unforgiveable that such a central flight control system wasn't documented for pilots.
Obviously you are right ✅️
Also only reading from one AoA sensor. The computer already got all the signals. Difference between a junior generalist programmer vs senior aerospace programmer.
@@phyzzip no Boeing wanted more money for 2nd AOA or something like that . The whole 737MAX program is a huge fail. This plane shouldn't have been approved at the beginning
Definitely true. As Petter explained here, there were a myriad of factors which led up to this crash from a variety of players involved. However, it's indisputable that the complete lack of explanation about MCAS was a big one.
@@Wolfeson28 How would an explanation about MCAS have helped?
I was in a horrid mood, youknow, one of those days where everything just goes against you. Then I see this video pop up, and my lovely girl calls me asking to meet after work. Feeling much better now❤️
I'm so glad to hear that! Have a great day!
@@MentourPilot thank you very much! You too!!
I think if the aircraft has an altitude disagree warning, it should send that via the transponder as well, so ATC gets displayed a "?" instead of a wrong value.
Each transponder receives digital static pressure from an encoding altimeter which is connected to the static port and is calibrated to measure altitude when the sea level pressure is standard 29.92 in. Hg. It transmits that altitude to the ground station. It is not affected by the altimeter setting or by corrections to the altitude made by the ADIRU and is unaware of any altitude disagree detected by the display system. The ground station applies a correction for the local altimeter setting to display the true altitude of the airplane to the controller.
Every time I watch one of your videos I'm incredibly thankful for all the engineers, cabin crew, pilots and airport personnel that have made all of my flights so far as safe and fortunately uneventful as possible.
At the same time, there's little which riles me up more than people not doing their job diligently when hundreds of lives depend on them.
Thank you for yet another fantastic video! I've enjoyed watching it a lot and I love to learn more about aviation even though I'm always just a passenger in the back of a plane.
the delay before the "stay tuned" and how it sits with the previous dialogue and the music sounded so professional and satisfying.
Thank you for explaining the situation in much more detail, Petter, and bringing this story a full explanation. It always delights me when a new video of yours appears in my notifications box!
Thank you! I’m glad you appreciate it
You are right about the altitude readout being received by the controllers not being understood by pilots. But you don't quite have it right either. Transponders have blind encoders which send out signals based on pressure altitude. That is to say, they always send out altitude based on 29.92Hg. That signal is then corrected by ground equipment to display altitude to the controllers. So it doesn't matter whether your transponder is set to 1 or 2. The altitude going out is always pressure altitude, not what your altimeter displays (unless the local altimeter is 29.92). This is why controllers will sometimes ask an aircraft to verify their altimeter setting. If you are flying the correct indicated altitude, but at the wrong altimeter setting, the controller will not see what your altimeter is showing. He will see pressure altitude corrected to local pressure, which will be your actual altitude. This is a great backup that the overwhelming majority of pilots do not know about.
What do you mean "it doesn't matter whether your transponder is set to 1 or 2" ? The altitude source switch of the transponder is still selecting which of the two ADIRUs is being used as source for the pressure altitude, which obviously matters when one of them is giving erroneous values due to a faulty sensor. That's why that switch exists.
Correct. At the top of our radar screen the barometric pressure is displayed, showing what the system is using for mode C readouts.
This makes another accident he talked about where the pilots set the wrong value in for their altimeter even worse then. Atc had either given the incorrect value or forgotten to update it I can't remember which but the aircraft was something like 160 ft lower then the pilots thought it was and resulted in them hitting tree tops if I'm remembering the correct video and then landing short of the runway after their engines failed from ingesting leaves and branches. This could have been avoided if there were a procedure requiring the pilots to call out their altitude at some point and for ATC to verify or correct it using the information from the transponder.
Your videos are always precise and well researched but this is the best I think. The Swiss cheese model yet again. Designers can never account for all scenarios but IMHO a system as powerful as this relying on a single input and to cap it all unknown to the drivers just should not have got anywhere near certification.
Follow the ……….
@@jfb7201I recently watched this episode. The controller gave the wrong setting. He realized it a couple seconds afterward and gave out the correct one. But his transmission was blocked and the pilots never heard it.
This is something i have a real hard spot with in a lot of heavily automated systems. And you don't get a lot more automated that a modern cockpit.
A fault is only useful if you know how that fault is generated. A self test is only good if you know what the self test is actually testing.
I service products my company makes, and quite a lot of the faults aren't explained in the manual AT ALL. Nor are the self tests. The equipment is very good, no problems there, but it's much harder to troubleshoot when you have to guess how the fault codes are generated, and how the self test routines generate those faults.
This is a real problem for maintenance people, and too many just think "hey, it passed the diagnostics, must be good!" That is incorrect thinking, and leads to a lot of failures being worse than they should have been.
In the Case of Lion Air Flight 610 Maintainence struggled unsuccesfully with the ongoing problems of this aircraft, even long before the accident sequence started, and their performance was really questionable. Not knowing about an important technical feature made it even worse, too. But way before it ended in the Java Sea it seems as if this aircraft was at no point of its two-month-existence really able to fly without fault messages and alarms.
The question is therefore: What would you do if you get a product with such stuff? Sent it back to the manufacturer?
Maybe this would have been the best decision for Lion Air.
At 13:07 in the video, you can see one of the maintenance personnel doing a selfie. Perhaps the self test instructions were not sufficiently clear 😛
Happy to see a new, very ethical sponsor of your latest videos.
I'm not a pilot, but an engineering enthusiast - and I appreciate how you're spreading such high level information through the Internet. Your videos are the highlights of the best education can ever be given remotely.
Thank you Mentour Pilot, and have my gratitude and appreciation.
Greetings,
Anthony
This is the best and most complete report of Lion Air 610 I’ve ever seen. After I viewed the Netflix ‘Documentary, I wondered if the producers of that vid even read the NTSB reports.
Another great engaging video. Thanks again Petter and your team for these.
I would love a T-shirt with the phrase "Remember that." Everytime I hear that, that point sticks. Love it
I'll see what I can do!
I love your content Petter, I'm sorry if I'm spelling your name wrong. Lots of love from Canada keep up the amazing content!
That’s the correct spelling! Thank you for being here, supporting!
Awesome, Petter. Been waiting a long time for you to do this one, and I know it was worth the wait, because you waited for ALL of the facts.
Thank you! Hope it was wort the wait!
At last, this incident. I take this opportunity to congratulate you (and now your expended team) for what is some of the best content on YT. From listening to the concerns of your subscribers to producing important content without any sensationalism, click baiting or controversy harvesting, your channel fills the of void of serious and professional aviation safety education. All the best!
This is heartbreaking. It sounds like the captain, sick and not at his best, was basically alone in the cockpit of a faulty aircraft. The odds were stacked against him. The first officer should not have been allowed to fly as in any emergency he would be no help at all, doubling the captains work load, especially compared to any competent first officer
Ahh I'm so glad you're covering these accidents, I've been looking forward to your take ❤ The contrast between the accident flight and a different crew experiencing the same fault the day before was so interesting and added so much context. Like two different swiss cheese slices.
I can tell how much you care about getting this right, I appreciate your thoughtfulness and attention to detail so much. Thank you ❤ I'll be back to rewatch this tomorrow, and already looking forward to the next one.
The captain actually adhered to "aviate, navigate, communicate". The first officer seemed so clueless in this situation, that trying to explain the situation would have been a waste of time and mental capacity.
What was probably what the Captain thought when the FO was unable to find the Airspeed-Unreliable-Checklist for minutes. But in this case he shouldn´t have handed over the controls to him.
I kind of feel like this crashed could have been avoided if captain didn't hand over control to the FO, but maybe during the stress of the moment captain didn't notice that FO didn't have the mental capacity to fly the plane. It must have been very stressful situation.
@@prach2 Indeed.
@MentourPilot i don't know if this is the intention of your channel. But since i started watching your videos I'm no longer a nervous flyer. 😁😁 You're the best✌️
Glad to hear it! That is indeed one of the intentions of the channel
I never had the full story on this crash. The news media usually just reported that it was a failure in crew training, or MCAS was a new advanced stall recovery system that Boeing didn't give training for, etc.
What is very unique about this accident report is we got to see how two different crews handled the same issue, with very different, and deadly, outcomes for the less able crew, highlighting the incredible importance of crew training and strict checkouts. Often, we only get the perspective of the crew that (mis)handled a complex situation, but we were able to see exactly how this situation should be handled. Except, somehow, the issue wasn't actually solved and the aircraft ended up under the command of less able airmen.
Thank you for this incredibly detailed dive into one of the most avoidable disasters of modern aviation.
This whole sequence of events was more complex than I realized. I didn't know how big a role the maintenance played, or that the earlier flight had the same issue but was able to correct it... and then didn't tell the next crew how. I've always thought that the best kind of rules are the ones you're given a good explanation for, and the more I watch this channel, the more right I think I am about that. Excellent stuff, truly. Top-tier, not just for the RUclipss, but for media in general. Incredible work.
3:32 Airbus 737-900?😂 great video! I like these longer form documentary style videos. The attention to detail in these videos, and the production style is incredible. Great job to you and your team!
I'm so glad you included the previous flight as well; it was so helpful to see how even with the exact same problem, different handling and awareness could make such a difference in the outcome!
Glad you enjoyed it!
What an incredible video! At first I thought "What's left to be told about this accident?". Not the least, as a Patreon to the channel, I should have known much better. Kind thx to the entire Mentour team for this Herculean work of a video! Can't wait for what's coming up next!
That's the opposite of what I think when a M.P. video drops, I think "OH SWEET, now I get to find out the full story!"
The fact that the crew were able to manage three checklists at the same time and got that far in such pressure is genuinely impressive and even more tragic for the future flights
ALSO YOUR VID QUALITY KEEPS GOING UP EVERY WEEK THIS IS AMAZING
I find your videos to be so very informative and well made and probably what i like most is how you explain everything. It really makes the difference if you're coming here as someone who might be passionate about aviation but does not know too much info on it or how things work. Keep up the good work Peter and the team!
I like the way that you put credits on the screen, at the beginning, to highlight your wonderful team.
I’m happy to see this video. Especially given your previous employer and your experience with these planes, I feared you might avoid them.
Respect and thanks for doing what you do, Petter.
One of your best mentour ,well done!
Thank you so much!
1 hour video feels like 10minutes! Great job! It perfectly explains how systems and teams work and how accidents happen when the whole system fails without anyone raising a red flag. Best explainer video over!
The number of information screwups and human, mechanical and software failures that had to line up for this disaster is startling. It really is incredible. So many places where a small thing could have been done to prevent it. Yet it seemed almost unstoppable.
Truly fantastic work analyzing it. As has become your standard. 😊👍👍
I'm looking forward to your CRM course, whenever it comes out. A recurring lesson from your videos has always been the importance of clear, decisive and calm communication between team members, and I feel it's a perfect lesson that extends beyond the airline industry itself. Leadership situations, relationship situations, family squabbles...all resolved with this.
Excited already, talking about this. Thanks for another thorough video.
OooF! Well done Petter! My stomach was clenching at the end! Thank you for explaining why the system kept activating. That was one of the missing pieces in my understanding!
I did not understand how you could go from single invocation to "Full Authority" without someone (a design engineer?) saying "Hang on! STOP!" Now I understand it was the retriggering that made it so!
I do think in the penultimate flight the presence of a third pilot in the jump seat was also crucial!
Thank you for such great content!
Indeed. While on the Crash Flight the Captain flew the aircraft in a kind of a single pilot because his First Officer was not competent enough to deal with such a situation.
As an avid MentourPilot and MentourNow viewer who watched every video and also saw for example Petter's interview about MCAS on the ColdFusion channel, I thought I basically knew everything about this Lion Air flight already and this would be just repetition for me... but this couldn't be further from the truth. I had no idea (or at least no memory) how the crew of the flight the day before could successfully handle the issue and I wasn't aware how much of an impact the lack of CRM and the pilot's skills had on this accident. So thank you very much Petter for really covering everything about this flight, not just MCAS and Boeing's fault! 🙏
This finally pushed me over the edge to become a Patreon, even though I don't have and never had anything to do with the aviation industry. I just think these videos are super interesting and the world needs more education like this about all sorts of topics (IT-Security and how hacks happen would be another I can think of where the public has a very warped perception about what makes a system secure)
Thank you Petter, I learned so many new details about this accident despite the massive coverage that was already out there. This is a top tier documentary.
If I may suggest one thing: I much prefer the more minimalistic music used in your videos about 1-2 years ago, the one in your newer ones doesn't always fit your otherwise so appropriate tone.
Peter...I want you and you team to know the impact tbese videos have had on me and my team. Im a professional firearms trainer here in the US and im the administrator for a state run shooting facility. Ive implemented CRM team building exercises with great success as well as teaching my team about the"swiss cheese" model. Last month we saw record usage for our program and we've received tnousands of 5 star google ratings with the majority of them commenting positively on our attention to safety and the professionalism of our crew. I want to extend a sincere thank you to you and your team for how thoroughly you explain these concepts and the importance they have in maintaining a safe and efficient environment in which to operate. Looking forward to many more years of these fantastic videos. Im also a huge aviation nerd. I have exactly 11 hours of flight experience, but who knows.... maybe one day..
Such incredible work! This must have taken a lot of time to research and animate! As always, good job.
Most underrated RUclips channel
Thank you 💕
it’s not underrated at all. this channel has exploded in popularity
Whenever I go back home to Indonesia, we never fly Lion Air. They just have a very bad rep, and that’s well before the Max accident. This documentary just confirms that. Thanks as always for your thorough investigation and for giving us all this information.
They had a bad reputation but they were mostly recovered when this happened. And before they got the MAX in their fleet, they actually inquired with Boeing about training their pilots in the sim for it... and Boeing said "no".
@MentourPilot wow, unbelievable 😢
Really appreciated this piece, thank you.
As a young aviation enthusiast and having a dream of becoming a pilot, i have learned A LOT from these kind of videos and i am truly grateful that i have found Peter's Chanel to take me through all the details and complexities that pilots have to deal with!!❤❤
Thank you Petter and team, great work !
Thank you for being here, supporting! The fact that you are here early, helps a lot!
Superb as always, my second favorite after your video about MH370. But I can’t deny this perfect in-depth research gives me more sadness about this accident… and more anger too. May they rest in peace.
I fly to and from work and Have been watching your channel since 2019
I always pretend your the pilot and your wife is the flight attendant after watching all these years Im not as stressed when we enter turbulence !😮
Thank you so much You were born for this !! God Bless
Merry Christmas 🔔🎄🎁 to you and your family from
USA
Merry Christmas!
I think it's fantastic that you've started running credits at the beginning of the program! These videos have such high production quality so it's fitting to see Dom's and the rest of the team's names on screen.
The combination of the simulated flight footage, professional opinion, and the very comprehensive breakdown makes this the best “Aviation accident” channel. IMO.
Nicely made. I feel like the general aviation community and people in general should be talking about Boeing's mistakes as much as possible as well as holding them accountable for all the lives lost.
Absolutely should, there is a history to this sort of stuff (like the hard over scenario issue in the past).
And obviously with the recent build quality problems, boeing needs to stop putting profit over safety and the FAA need to get out of boeings pocket.
a friend of mine was on the plane during its Bali to Jakarta flight. he told me after he landed that he was nervous the whole flight.
i can only imagine what he felt and thought after he reached home and watched the news later...
I would guess the plane was pitching up and down the whole time. Which would feel like you ride on some wobbly way.
@@ouwebrood497 No, they shut off the electric trim system, which stopped the runaway trim.
Petter, @30:15 you say that even though none of the checklists for the 3 issues the pilots were confronted with advised “landing at the closest available airport”, that it would be “OK” to do so, and in fact you would “dare say that would be the best thing to do”. Have you ever gone “against standard procedures” or improvised and implemented a course of action that you knew would be questioned? If so, I think we’d all like to hear about it; what you did and what were the repercussions of those charged in investigating the incident. Great video, thanks.
You explain everything so well I am a complete novice in all of this but I have started watching your videos and really got to understand more about different topics related to aviation and the tragic and unfortunate accidents. Thank you for your work and bringing knowledge and understanding to us.