Right? Do people give real artists "keywords" as if they are prompting an AI? I always thought that people just told artists what they wanted. As in, using descriptions. Not straight up word prompts.
It's probably a request from someone else, they're basically intermediaries, between their clients of some site like Fiverr, and the artist they steal from.
Yeah that was a major hint that they were gonna use it to train AI and abuse this. I’m not any kind of artist by any means but I can recognize those kinds of prompts
Language shapes the way we interact with others; this is why as a failed writer I STILL HARP ON the fact how you talk and what words you use MATTER. It is odd to say but the words you use does influence how you're interacting with others on a day to day basis from typing to writing.
Even if it wasn't an ai scam, people could sell your drawing in any other way. So if someone feels suspicious in any way ask them for more stuff such as more details, or social media, because that would either bore the scammer or give you the chance to make sure they're legit (or catch them through their accounts if they ever do anything wrong) But the best way is to completely ignore them if you find anything that seems wrong.
The scam part is abit weird, its not like there's billions of art you can feed to your AI all over the internet. Also they can just reuse your art from your posted gallery.
From what i gathered, feeding too much stuff to Ai does not make it better. The best models people use apparently are usually trained with under 200 images. It's not called inteligence for nothing i guess@@reivell3699
@@reivell3699Yeah that’s my thought idk how big this scam actually is I feel like most people would just grab an artist free work and then just use AI to edit it anyways. I mean it’s still a scam but I feel like it’s not as common and AI bros will use other easier ways to get money since that is their whole thing haha
@@squirrelhallowino29 An artist still owns the copyright of what they drew so technically it's their right to prevent you from selling what you've bought. In order to own the full copyright of the work you bought you have to negotiate a price and have then sign their copyright over to you. If you have a physical piece of the work the waters get a lot more muddy and you selling that specific physical item is almost always going to be alright. Think of it this way, if you buy a game you can't then rip the game and sell copies to others, but you can sell the physical item to someone else generally.
Prabably should've ended communication when they literally fed you prompts and keywords as if you were an AI generator. Even if they weren't scammers, the fact that they didn't talk to you like a human, couldn't be bothered to use full on sentences and take the time to describe exactly what they wanted, shows what kind of client they are.
@@theanonymspysandwich 4chan's art board is flooded by 24/7 AI demoralization campaigns. They're too busy telling aibros to kts to pretend to be aibros.
The nerve of ai artists to tell us our artworks are trash and that's why we're scared when the entire foundation of their art is based of stolen hard work that the same "trash" artists made💀💀💀
IMO it is a problem but at some point the ai drawings that are stolen are going to inbreed which means you can much more clearly see the ai's flaws and thus we come back full circle
@@viyaura ai programmer here - the internet is becoming more and more packed with ai generated images. the models are being trained on images from the internet, so now the models have ai generated images in their datasets. the more the ai is getting trained on it's own output, the worse it performs, and eventually it will pretty much start generating only solid colors
Well there is a solution such as handpicking them yourself but that'd take alot of time but it's possible, I can imagine a group of people eventually doing that and then recreating people's styles to get money out of it, but again I'm pretty unaware how much data it takes for it to copy someone's style
@@Releo0 insanely massive amounts of data. plus the people engineering ai have really good salaries, selling bootleg ai art is everything but worth it to them
Always take payment first! You can choose not to give refunds after you've started it, or offer to refund 50% refund after you've already started on it.
that, or just plaster some watermarks on it ;P a person could see through the watermarks, and have an idea what it will look like, but it would totally ruin the AI trying to "enhance" it, lol, and if you want watermark-free image, then pay up, best of both worlds, if they're gonna scam, they're unlikely to want to actually pay up, but if they are really interested, they can still give feedback what they want changed
@@jan_harald you'd still be working for free if you give out a rough draft, watermarked or not, without taking any payment first. However I guess that's up to the artist and how much they value their time.
@@IZZYCHAN13 True there are scammers, but those can be found everywhere in all different freelance categories, if you fall for one that's on the buyers bad judgement. Do your research first.
It's difficult because artists can scam people too. Asking for paypal friends and family so they don't have to pay you back. That happened to my friend once. And if you do paypal normally there are fees and there's a chance people will take the art then ask paypal for the refund of services anyway... or if the art gets delayed for certain amounts of time and people get impatient....
I would say to just ask for the full amount straight up. Unless its something in the hundreds of dollars then 50/50 is reasonable ask. Douche bag customers have always been known to just take the sketch and run. So send only a low quality, watermarked sketch to show them to protect against these kind of people.
Not an artist, and never commissioned art, but can someone tell me if it's common to get a lot of weird keywords that mean nothing, and then you give a sketch that almost looks done already? Because first of, damm, that looks nice. And second, people feeding you keywords for art sounded like they think you are one of those ai generators (to me). I honestly thought her story was going to go in that direction. "This random person thought I was an AI art generator, look how I messed with them".
Never done commissions before, but I find that coming up with keywords actually helps me draw better, to stick to the concept more. If it's a person/character I'll think about their personality. Let's say an almond for example, maybe I come up with "wrinkled" or "creased". I dunno, even though I'm not a machine I do feel like having some keywords is helpful. Not sure if it's common, but whenever I draw something for someone I definitely make a habit of asking them for descriptive words like that.
@@stygianoatman I get that. For example for the character, I can understand you saying; "it's a female, she is wearing plate mail, colors of her outfit, maybe a symbol, hairstyle, weaponry, a bit of her background and personality for posture and facial expression etc. But I do think what I just described and what you said, is different from these AI generator keywords that she recieved. Those seem just weird to me, but again, it might be common for an artist to be treated like an ai art generator.
@@BrotherHood-xh9sg I think it's definitely common. My brother works freelance jobs in the game industry (creates armors and stuff), and his bosses have had a tendency to ask for things and just expect immediate results or estimations. Or they ask for one thing and then another, as if forgetting what they already pitched. People treat artists like that, I think, because they view art as a product/commodity and not as a process. It's pretty dystopian, but that's how a lot of people see things. Probably why things like AI art even exist, they view it as a product and want more. Products are made by machines, experiences are made by people. Art is an experience, not merely a product.
I used to get art commission before but I have never met art clients that treat me like a freaking A.I generator. All of my past clients were conversing with me normally by uploading their refs and actually talk like real human to human.
Girl, don't just go sending off samples without putting up a wall of "sample" on the image and make it low resolution. did it before this AI was a thing.
Since "Don't do commissions" is apparantly an option, might I suggest; 1. Go back in time and don't become an artist. 2. Go back in time and become the president of the world. Thus granting you the power to protect people from this scam. 3. Go back in time, hire a hacker and scam the scammer. 4. Become GOD. I have other suggestions if you want to hear them.
@@OfficeDuck- you choose a path to walk upon. Suffer through the hardships this path provides, and with hard work, determination and some thought, you might set your eyes upon a beautifull sight. As for specific steps, that's up to you. I mean, you can't expect me to do all the work. I already gave you some "super valid" options.
Some more advice: 1) Do upfront payments. Let the commissioner pay first before you start any work 2) Stick with reputable commissioners. New fresh accounts without any content/artwork will sound fishy 3) Situational but never be afraid to use callout posts on scammers. You can warn your watchers and artist friends to avoid that user
This and the fact that huge, rich companies that regularly work with artists (Wacom and Riot) actually hired scammers/AI "artists" recently is so scarry and dissapointing
@@Pollicina_db they used AI graphics on their ads recently, then quickly removed it after people realized and got angry, there are still videos about it though if you are interested.
To add to Glaze, there's Nightshade now, that also poisons your illustrations! AI Bros are going crazy because of it, saying it's unethical (destruction of property, I've read. But OUR drawings are OUR property so UMH?????) So have fun with it, people.
I've already heard there's ways around glaze and nightshade. If I were an ai programmer intent on training on peoples art, I'd make a bot to screenshot all the glazed/nightshade art before it becomes training material, basically turning it back into a normal picture.
wait i dont get it@@botarakutabi1199 Screen shot the art before you give it to the ai for training? or before they put it into glazed/nightshade converter?
NEVER, EVER work for free. Drafts /concept sketches are work. Get paid for them. Hopefully, other novice artists can learn from this negative experience and avoid getting snookered 😊 Thanks for sharing what happened as well as ways to prevent it👍🏾
They can take the money for a sketch and if somebody don't decide to go with the full commission, the work is not done for free. But if somebody likes it and want you to finish, you can deduct the price of the sketch from the final price of the ready product.
IMPORTANT: Glazing does not help with this type of scam. AI can still "finish" glazed images. Detailed explaination: Usually Generative Image AI uses noise as base images and runs the model in combination with text prompts over to, to transform it according to the model. With Image to image used in this scam, the noise is replaced by the image of an artist, tweaking the weight of the model, so the model manipulates it less, to not overwrite everything. Glazing does also not stop AI from reading what is displayed on the image, in terms of keywords. I tested this with stable diffusion/ comfy UI and the example images form the glazed website.
Man, I hate AI. I just wish this shit didn't happen in my lifetime, and it's only going to get worse from this point on... anyone else feel really discouraged becauase of AI?
the worst thing is they hurt the real AI artists, who make actually great art using AI but don't you worry, AI being trained on AI-generated images will ruin the quality ;P
@@bigbaguette4860 theres people that use it as a tool in that case i think the artist term still applies since its just a tool for these people and not the entire thing is ai made. like the more human control and human effort is in the end result the closer it comes to real art. theres even artists that have also started using ai so that they can skip the sketch phase and have more time for details and etc. so imo it depends on how you use it
@@jan_harald i agree but that second statement is only half true. yes, when poor AI generated images are being fed back into the ai it will make worse images. BUT when you make ai images and then refine them to the point of it actually being a good art piece then it can be fed back into the machine without worsening the quality since it IS a good art piece because of the refining(aka no bad hands, correct anatomy, correct proportions, detail is good etc.)
Thanks for the warning. I find it funny how much AI relys so much on taking work from humans. Like why couldn't the scammer just prompt the art out of thin air instead of DMing actual artist for sketches.
Thank you for this!! I'm considering starting commissions for the first time this year and avoiding scams is gonna be crucial since I'm not experienced with identifying them, the advice at the end was extremely useful since I was worried about people using sketches I produce in a way I don't condone
Unfortunately tools like glaze and nightshade are only marginally effective at best, and pretty much only to combat ai training, not img 2 img which is what this was. Huge watermarks should be at least partially effective. But yeah payment upfront (even just 50-50) is by far the best one. These people don't want to spend a DIME
But like...Why...Do they even need to scam somebody like this? If they're finding it difficult to get a specific image they can just use controlnet and some sort of posing software, as well as custom models and LoRAs. I'm not really sure what the point of this is, it's just incredibly unproductive for both parties.
This is sort of important to charge for sketches too. Not full price of course, but if it takes you 3h to make a sketch and present idea for the final painting - charge for it. This way anyone who tried to scam you will retreat because - you can still press charges and file lawsuit if the art was sold to a third party especially if the art was sold using theft (claiming that you're the OG artist is theft even if you mauled the sketch with the AI) as you're not forfeiting your copyright by default unless you signed a legally binding document that the drawing will have a new copyright holder the moment financial exchange completes. You have a lot of evidence of the wrongdoing and I highly recommend everyone to remember that you're not defenseless in this whole fight, and the scam is not able to sustain itself for much longer - you're the OG artist, you can prove any minute that you're the creator, the person stealing cannot.
that, or just plaster some watermarks on it ;P a person could see through the watermarks, and have an idea what it will look like, but it would totally ruin the AI trying to "enhance" it, lol, and if you want watermark-free image, then pay up, best of both worlds, if they're gonna scam, they're unlikely to want to actually pay up, but if they are really interested, they can still give feedback what they want changed
@@jan_harald watermarks don't work as proven many times, the work could have your name plastered all over it and they'd still use it and someone still would pay for this crap. I think we've handled enough of the mistreatment and nonsense, and I highly encourage any artist who has ever been mistreated to take matters into their hands and force real consequences either by using small claims court or no win no fee copyright lawyers.
I have AI locally installed on my PC. I have no idea why these guys go into all of that trouble when nowadays you can draw a stick figure yourself and AI will make it into a masterpiece. If you know how to use the tool its pretty simple.
Ai actually gets people’s art then jumbles it up into another piece of art and if it continues art will never be original again AND it will continue to go through this rabbit whole of weirdness
@@GLIXCH1812 That's the main issue with current AI systems. Even if they iron out the errors, due to how it floods the internet with its own images, it can never be original and it will start to feed its own garbage into the system leading to pumping out even more garbage that gets fed back in. And its not like actual artists aren't out there anymore, but they get overwhelmed by AI that any AI algorithm would just not weigh actual artwork appropriately. For something unique and creative, you would have to start approaching actual general intelligence(ie. capable of wide range of tasks). That would be a HUGE breakthrough but would be even more disruptive than robotic manufacturing or the current AI art/text/voice situation.
Hey, as someone who trains AI models for personal use, I just want to say that the big, obnoxious watermarks is the only way you're gonna get around people using your art. They found a way around glaze and I'm sure that if I had enough time I could even get the AI to ignore a lot of the small watermarks. But big ones are a pain and people will usually just skip over those images.
@@deltaxcd yeah, that's why I said the big, obnoxious ones. the kind you can't magically scrub that away with photoshop in one click. if you have to spend more than 10 minutes getting rid of it, it's a no-go imo. more trouble than it's worth.
Yeah it just sucks that you have to essentially post a lesser version of your art if you are really adamant about not getting your art put in a dataset@@canelitaa5337
I've been doing comms for a couple of years now so I'd have declined after that second email with the weird keywords because that's weird as hell. But why would you send such a detailed sketch before receiving any payment at all from a total stranger? I don't understand, that looked good enough to be used even without AI tampering tbh, as suggestions said at the very least do half payment upfront unless you're dealing with someone you trust very much.
i've seen people count other things as sketches and not just the base idea, though they probably were never scammed before (in commissions) so they didn't think to just do half and half or full payment on front.
danm i get those messages from art station and i never reply because people ask me for pieces of my portfolio to turn them into NFT and wtf is that i can barely speak English. Some others offer me to pay with crypto coins is that even posible? im a third world country artist so im probably living in the rock era yet. But yea everything is shady as fuck these days.
You can't really copy an artstyle or character with just one sketch, their only option is to use controlnet to make an image based on a sketch. There's no way to make this stuff financialy sustainable, cuz you will need a constant stream of dumb people to buy low-quality stuff.
How you can avoid your art being stolen by AI: 1. Try classic drawing lessons. Find people to model for you, draw still life, draw what you see. 2. Avoid Deviantart like hell. Even if you make art friends online try to meet and draw together in real life. This way all your styles evolve past the texture skills easier and, maybe, you can collaborte making bigger projects and not just commisions. Try to be a team person. 3. Do not imitate anime art nor copy any other already existing art styles. Do it only as an exercise. You don't chose your style, your style choses you. If you love manga style and japanese culture try to learn from the best and not any online deadface "artist". 4. Study Art History This way you are avoiding your drawings (your art for Americans) looking already like AI drawings.
Same, lowkey, none of this ai stuff personally bothers me as an artist. But then again, neither did tracing. I'm going to keep making art, no matter what ai does. And the best part, I can even use ai as a tool sometimes. Making collages with ai images is fun, like cutting and pasting magazines, but the magazines are real;y weird.
This is sad, This is one of the many reasons why I don't like or consume absolutely anything made by AI. People will type "autumn winter", AI will generate STOLEN ART, and they will think that the AI is a very good at generating art. Feels bad, I hope this didn't affect you too much.
So somebody asks you to draw something and you come up with a generic ass anime girl portrait and they never pay you. So where, in that, does AI come in? It makes no sense. I can have my PC shit out 50 images like the one you did in 10 minutes. Scamming an artist is just so much more work.
When drawing stuff they often end up using opposing color palettes or moods and atmosphere that clash into each other is more the problem, like from the standpoint of the first image you think of when you first see those words is probably mid autumn and mid winter. So warm toned saturated palletes and sunny patches and snow and clouds or cold, dark lighting. You get me? It would take a couple thumbnail sketches and ref pictures to get that late autumn, bright winter vibe right if you don’t immediately already have something in mind. It’s tricky and uncommon but not impossible! The whole list is literally just AI prompts though- it was probably copy pasted from a prompt they tried to get an AI to do but when they didn’t get what they wanted they contacted an artist to steal because apparently stealing from thousands of artist already wasn’t enough lmfao.
i'm not sure i quite fully understand the function of such a scam, it would be significantly easier to just fully generate ai content via directly stealing your artwork to train into a style model like a LoRA. If an AI bro is so bad at prompt engineering or so bad with his tools that he actually needs to involve himself to commission an artist, I have a suspicion that the scam runs potentially deeper than just stealing art, perhaps it's phishing as well, especially if you provided your details for payment. keep yourself safe!
Honestly this scam here is just even more evidence that these AI bros are just stealing from artists in general. Like, good luck trying to convince me that this IS NOT theft. They're even trying to steal art that ISN'T already in the datasets.
I literally commented about my thoughts on generated art in a separate video and holy crap I was right. As an artist, I am absolutely baffled at the audacity of these types of people who do these types of things. So many people don't understand the process, pain, or love that goes through making art. The people trying to not make this such a big of a deal just don't understand that stealing art is stealing art and it doesn't matter if it's with ai or not, the artist spent time and effort on that and it should not be so soullessly recreated or taken.
As somebody who uses AI all of the fucking time... You still need human DECISION making when it comes to GenAI shit. The correct response to this is to crank up the price for a sketch because it contains most of the key artistic DECISIONS. I don't think the arms race approach is the right answer, look at what happened to musicians getting their music stolen.
Ikd about ai as a whole for art, but i use it in 3 key ways. Generating character reference sheets of characters i want to make but have zero idea how they would look, for coloring my work since i am bad at colored art, and hyper detailed promotional covers for my own projects i did draw. Heck, my current pfp is an ai rendition of my vtuber model i made myself, that i couldn't draw because my tablet is busted.
I'm hating these ai cheapers now... Randomly i commented on someone's video on RUclips by saying my interests in illustrator... As the video was based on personal interests... Someone replied me saying illustrators don't have any career... As there are many ai tools people use.... At this point I felt too much demotivated... Also on my Instagram recommendations now I get these ai cheapers... I'm starting to hate them even more now... Sometimes I wanna just report everyone 😂
what is your opinion on people who order a commission and give AI images as reference for the base concept of the character (but tell you that it's AI? Would you be mad or would you be fine with it because the person used AI for the idea but wants to pay for an human made version.
bruh, I dont understand the scam. AI can generate images from 0 using the words the "ai" or scammer sent you and people can go even further with "hallucinations" (like magnific or krea) in your own PC using Stable Diffusion models for even better results in terms of detail. I think you got scammed sure, but the AI bro is plain stupid. He he is too lazy to write a prompt or even ask AI to create a prompt for him using the keywords and the style he is looking for. My bet is there is something else going on.
I'm from the ai "bro" side of thing. I just fallen in love with it cause it was just a fun toy. I do feel that problem as an "artist" did the same to me in some way. Like he knew i did AI but i sucked at drawing. So i asked a lineart/sketches of his preference for 15$ so i could complete it with my 3D reference. (I would have asked more if the job were made) i got refunded by Paypal since he goested me 7days. I had never done a commission before ai or even 1 year after. Good platform and feedback is king for trust.
Ok here are truths about all those "how to avoid": glaze- will not help it is for training AI not for completing sketches watermarks - will not help they can be removed by the same AI inpainting so say bye bye to watermarks in general. the rest is just same as closing commissions maybe one wasy how it could work if you send just half of the image as in that case AI will have trouble to create another half it woud be how much you pay that much of the image you get LOL
Forget stuff like "huge watermark". You'll still have lost your time. Anyone serious will know your art style already and should be willing to at least pay 50% up front. If not, those people are gonna be a pain to deal with anyways.
If I was in this situation, I'd make the most purposefully awful art, anatomy problems, incorrect shading, uncanny facial features, all on purpose, so I could mess up the AI software as much as I can 😈😇
You could also maybe just take a picture of the screen instead of sending the digital image to even further obscure it. (I would still put the filter on top, though....man this is just sad )
Actually this is pretty old scam scheme that just slightly changed with shitty ai touch and therefore it became even worse. In the original scheme the scammer looks for an artist, usually middle skilled not very popular and with underpriced comissions and then sells this comission by higher price to other person that thinks they're buying comission directly from an artist but OH NO there's a parasite scammer in between This scheme was kind of a cancer in art community of post-soviet countries, scammers often used to order comission in cheaper local currencies and then sold them in usd
Lol I gave up on art a long time ago cuz i suck, I burned all my art I made from high school to about 20, maybe it was a good idea to burn it all. All this AI stuff is making me feel like shits just gonna get worse and worse
Yeah, as others say. Take a deposit, even if it's a trivially small amount for a regular person. The scammers don't want to spend even a tiny amount of money because they are operating out of places like India.
I've also heard charging for sketches. Although that may be less and less reliable as machines can do more with less. Either that or hike the rate by 80%, and then add tons of hidden middle fingers to it.
@@viyaura that, or just plaster some watermarks on it ;P a person could see through the watermarks, and have an idea what it will look like, but it would totally ruin the AI trying to "enhance" it, lol, and if you want watermark-free image, then pay up, best of both worlds, if they're gonna scam, they're unlikely to want to actually pay up, but if they are really interested, they can still give feedback what they want changed
I mean, after they talk to you in THAT kind of English, you can safely protect yourself from a scam by just ghosting them from the start. It's very unlikely that a person that doesn't even care to speak like a human to you will pay you anything or be any decent further. Also I tried to find AI to finish up my sketches, but I found nothing that would work any decently :( My point is, it's much more useful than detrimental imo, but where do these AI bros even finish their sketches?
TOTALLY SLAP A BIG FAT WATERMARK!!! MAKE IT AS OBNOXIOUS AS YOU CAN!!! ... but seriously do whatever it takes to protect your art. If the customer cant understand and be accommodating then something is sus.
When it comes to commissions, it's usually standard practice to have some form of upfront payment first before fully engaging the artwork process. Also, the way the email was worded was really suspicious like they were thinking that they were "feeding prompts" to a human artist like they would with a computer... that's irksome in all sorts of ways possible. :/
Okay but why do all AI need to be screenwriters, like can't we make an AI that does something useful like picking up trash or smthn, just let the peacful and easy(ish) jobs to the humans
because capitalism. the owners of companies want to make as much money as possible, so they have the least amount of employees they have to pay. It's easier to pay very little to workers of menial jobs, that's why they aren't being replaced first.
Ah yes we as artists should definitely stop doing commissions because ai as if we are the problem 💀 I don't do commissions but that made me a bit irritated.
There is no protective layer”” you can use on ai, I’m telling you as someone who has trained ai models etc the best thing to do is use those big nasty water marks
the fact they literally were talking to you, an artist, like an AI prompt, is frickin insane.
Right? Do people give real artists "keywords" as if they are prompting an AI? I always thought that people just told artists what they wanted. As in, using descriptions. Not straight up word prompts.
if they didn't have a problem stealing art, I don't think they have a problem treating artists in an insane way
It's probably a request from someone else, they're basically intermediaries, between their clients of some site like Fiverr, and the artist they steal from.
Yeah that was a major hint that they were gonna use it to train AI and abuse this.
I’m not any kind of artist by any means but I can recognize those kinds of prompts
Language shapes the way we interact with others; this is why as a failed writer I STILL HARP ON the fact how you talk and what words you use MATTER. It is odd to say but the words you use does influence how you're interacting with others on a day to day basis from typing to writing.
Damn we got ai scammers before gta6.
not suprising
@@Ibloop fr
AI scams have been around for many years.
@@IbloopDRINK WATER
lol
Even if it wasn't an ai scam, people could sell your drawing in any other way. So if someone feels suspicious in any way ask them for more stuff such as more details, or social media, because that would either bore the scammer or give you the chance to make sure they're legit (or catch them through their accounts if they ever do anything wrong)
But the best way is to completely ignore them if you find anything that seems wrong.
I feel like if i buy a painting i can sell that painting. That makes the most sense.
The scam part is abit weird, its not like there's billions of art you can feed to your AI all over the internet. Also they can just reuse your art from your posted gallery.
From what i gathered, feeding too much stuff to Ai does not make it better. The best models people use apparently are usually trained with under 200 images. It's not called inteligence for nothing i guess@@reivell3699
@@reivell3699Yeah that’s my thought idk how big this scam actually is I feel like most people would just grab an artist free work and then just use AI to edit it anyways.
I mean it’s still a scam but I feel like it’s not as common and AI bros will use other easier ways to get money since that is their whole thing haha
@@squirrelhallowino29
An artist still owns the copyright of what they drew so technically it's their right to prevent you from selling what you've bought. In order to own the full copyright of the work you bought you have to negotiate a price and have then sign their copyright over to you.
If you have a physical piece of the work the waters get a lot more muddy and you selling that specific physical item is almost always going to be alright.
Think of it this way, if you buy a game you can't then rip the game and sell copies to others, but you can sell the physical item to someone else generally.
even their messages sound like an untrained ai chatbot
Even then the chatbot would have better grammar.
ai chatbots talk very well actually
@@deltaxcd that's why i said untrained
Literally-
In fact, prompts and training are used to create grammatical errors and fillers in order to make it appear natural.
Prabably should've ended communication when they literally fed you prompts and keywords as if you were an AI generator. Even if they weren't scammers, the fact that they didn't talk to you like a human, couldn't be bothered to use full on sentences and take the time to describe exactly what they wanted, shows what kind of client they are.
Could be bad english, but still that list of words is enough for me to ignore it
To me it sounds more like some mockery. as if client was trolling the artist
This is 'protect yourself from phishing attempts' 101. There's broken English, then there's this.
Kinda sounds like a 4chan psyop tbh.
@@theanonymspysandwich 4chan's art board is flooded by 24/7 AI demoralization campaigns. They're too busy telling aibros to kts to pretend to be aibros.
The nerve of ai artists to tell us our artworks are trash and that's why we're scared when the entire foundation of their art is based of stolen hard work that the same "trash" artists made💀💀💀
Anyone who makes the effort to put out even the most simple, inexperienced art piece is already 10x more artistically valuable than AI shitheads.
IMO it is a problem but at some point the ai drawings that are stolen are going to inbreed which means you can much more clearly see the ai's flaws and thus we come back full circle
interesting, i've never thought about it that way
Inbreed is crazy 😭
@@viyaura ai programmer here - the internet is becoming more and more packed with ai generated images. the models are being trained on images from the internet, so now the models have ai generated images in their datasets. the more the ai is getting trained on it's own output, the worse it performs, and eventually it will pretty much start generating only solid colors
Well there is a solution such as handpicking them yourself but that'd take alot of time but it's possible, I can imagine a group of people eventually doing that and then recreating people's styles to get money out of it, but again I'm pretty unaware how much data it takes for it to copy someone's style
@@Releo0 insanely massive amounts of data. plus the people engineering ai have really good salaries, selling bootleg ai art is everything but worth it to them
Always take payment first! You can choose not to give refunds after you've started it, or offer to refund 50% refund after you've already started on it.
that, or just plaster some watermarks on it ;P
a person could see through the watermarks, and have an idea what it will look like, but it would totally ruin the AI trying to "enhance" it, lol, and if you want watermark-free image, then pay up, best of both worlds, if they're gonna scam, they're unlikely to want to actually pay up, but if they are really interested, they can still give feedback what they want changed
@@jan_harald you'd still be working for free if you give out a rough draft, watermarked or not, without taking any payment first. However I guess that's up to the artist and how much they value their time.
Artists run with your money and you never see the result, so no
@@IZZYCHAN13 True there are scammers, but those can be found everywhere in all different freelance categories, if you fall for one that's on the buyers bad judgement. Do your research first.
It's difficult because artists can scam people too. Asking for paypal friends and family so they don't have to pay you back. That happened to my friend once. And if you do paypal normally there are fees and there's a chance people will take the art then ask paypal for the refund of services anyway... or if the art gets delayed for certain amounts of time and people get impatient....
You can do commissions but always get a deposit. Even for the sketch, since it's still your time they are asking for
I would say to just ask for the full amount straight up. Unless its something in the hundreds of dollars then 50/50 is reasonable ask.
Douche bag customers have always been known to just take the sketch and run. So send only a low quality, watermarked sketch to show them to protect against these kind of people.
@@kyer9677 from my experience, most clients will pay the whole amount u^front anyway. Unless it's very expensive as you said.
Not an artist, and never commissioned art, but can someone tell me if it's common to get a lot of weird keywords that mean nothing, and then you give a sketch that almost looks done already? Because first of, damm, that looks nice. And second, people feeding you keywords for art sounded like they think you are one of those ai generators (to me). I honestly thought her story was going to go in that direction.
"This random person thought I was an AI art generator, look how I messed with them".
They literally sound like a fucking ai art generator user trying to commission an artist for the first time in their life
Never done commissions before, but I find that coming up with keywords actually helps me draw better, to stick to the concept more. If it's a person/character I'll think about their personality. Let's say an almond for example, maybe I come up with "wrinkled" or "creased". I dunno, even though I'm not a machine I do feel like having some keywords is helpful. Not sure if it's common, but whenever I draw something for someone I definitely make a habit of asking them for descriptive words like that.
@@stygianoatman I get that. For example for the character, I can understand you saying; "it's a female, she is wearing plate mail, colors of her outfit, maybe a symbol, hairstyle, weaponry, a bit of her background and personality for posture and facial expression etc.
But I do think what I just described and what you said, is different from these AI generator keywords that she recieved. Those seem just weird to me, but again, it might be common for an artist to be treated like an ai art generator.
@@BrotherHood-xh9sg I think it's definitely common. My brother works freelance jobs in the game industry (creates armors and stuff), and his bosses have had a tendency to ask for things and just expect immediate results or estimations. Or they ask for one thing and then another, as if forgetting what they already pitched.
People treat artists like that, I think, because they view art as a product/commodity and not as a process. It's pretty dystopian, but that's how a lot of people see things. Probably why things like AI art even exist, they view it as a product and want more.
Products are made by machines, experiences are made by people. Art is an experience, not merely a product.
I used to get art commission before but I have never met art clients that treat me like a freaking A.I generator. All of my past clients were conversing with me normally by uploading their refs and actually talk like real human to human.
Girl, don't just go sending off samples without putting up a wall of "sample" on the image and make it low resolution. did it before this AI was a thing.
Since "Don't do commissions" is apparantly an option, might I suggest;
1. Go back in time and don't become an artist.
2. Go back in time and become the president of the world. Thus granting you the power to protect people from this scam.
3. Go back in time, hire a hacker and scam the scammer.
4. Become GOD.
I have other suggestions if you want to hear them.
AHHAHA ID LOVE TO HEAR WHAT ELSE YOU HAVE
5. Ask for cash first
6. Get a stable job
Ok… what do i do now?
Don't do commissions? Then real artists won't get supported
@@OfficeDuck- you choose a path to walk upon. Suffer through the hardships this path provides, and with hard work, determination and some thought, you might set your eyes upon a beautifull sight.
As for specific steps, that's up to you. I mean, you can't expect me to do all the work. I already gave you some "super valid" options.
Some more advice:
1) Do upfront payments. Let the commissioner pay first before you start any work
2) Stick with reputable commissioners. New fresh accounts without any content/artwork will sound fishy
3) Situational but never be afraid to use callout posts on scammers. You can warn your watchers and artist friends to avoid that user
I wouldn't even answer that email even if starved for work, they sound like a child
I agree it was red flags right from the get go. Heck I seen downgraded ChatGPT generate better text than that.
Or an Indian.
@@rightwingreactionaryoh…
@@arishaxml Stereotypes exist for a reason. Don't take it to heart.
This and the fact that huge, rich companies that regularly work with artists (Wacom and Riot) actually hired scammers/AI "artists" recently is so scarry and dissapointing
Wacom supports this shit? Sad… i have one of their cheaper tablets
@@Pollicina_db they used AI graphics on their ads recently, then quickly removed it after people realized and got angry, there are still videos about it though if you are interested.
Wacom? That's a sad and dissapointing irony
You should come to SEA, people are hiring these AI bros left and right
@@alvinvalentino5797 what is it? I can't find information
To add to Glaze, there's Nightshade now, that also poisons your illustrations! AI Bros are going crazy because of it, saying it's unethical (destruction of property, I've read. But OUR drawings are OUR property so UMH?????)
So have fun with it, people.
If only glaze didnt add weird artifacts to your drawings 🥺
Oh, the irony of AI bros calling something unethical
I've already heard there's ways around glaze and nightshade. If I were an ai programmer intent on training on peoples art, I'd make a bot to screenshot all the glazed/nightshade art before it becomes training material, basically turning it back into a normal picture.
Both of those are scams to get grant fund money, giving artists false hopes.
wait i dont get it@@botarakutabi1199
Screen shot the art before you give it to the ai for training? or before they put it into glazed/nightshade converter?
NEVER, EVER work for free. Drafts /concept sketches are work. Get paid for them.
Hopefully, other novice artists can learn from this negative experience and avoid getting snookered 😊
Thanks for sharing what happened as well as ways to prevent it👍🏾
They can take the money for a sketch and if somebody don't decide to go with the full commission, the work is not done for free. But if somebody likes it and want you to finish, you can deduct the price of the sketch from the final price of the ready product.
IMPORTANT: Glazing does not help with this type of scam. AI can still "finish" glazed images.
Detailed explaination:
Usually Generative Image AI uses noise as base images and runs the model in combination with text prompts over to, to transform it according to the model.
With Image to image used in this scam, the noise is replaced by the image of an artist, tweaking the weight of the model, so the model manipulates it less, to not overwrite everything.
Glazing does also not stop AI from reading what is displayed on the image, in terms of keywords.
I tested this with stable diffusion/ comfy UI and the example images form the glazed website.
these ai bros have hit a new low man🤦♂
And yet we're the irrational bad guys.
Keep that in mind.
This all is just a big joke.
Man, I hate AI. I just wish this shit didn't happen in my lifetime, and it's only going to get worse from this point on... anyone else feel really discouraged becauase of AI?
Sorry to hear this happened. AI "artist" clowns are a new plague.
the worst thing is they hurt the real AI artists, who make actually great art using AI
but don't you worry, AI being trained on AI-generated images will ruin the quality ;P
@@jan_haraldI don’t think “real artist” and “AI” belong together lmao
@@bigbaguette4860 theres people that use it as a tool in that case i think the artist term still applies since its just a tool for these people and not the entire thing is ai made. like the more human control and human effort is in the end result the closer it comes to real art. theres even artists that have also started using ai so that they can skip the sketch phase and have more time for details and etc. so imo it depends on how you use it
@@jan_harald i agree but that second statement is only half true. yes, when poor AI generated images are being fed back into the ai it will make worse images. BUT when you make ai images and then refine them to the point of it actually being a good art piece then it can be fed back into the machine without worsening the quality since it IS a good art piece because of the refining(aka no bad hands, correct anatomy, correct proportions, detail is good etc.)
"real AI artist"? What kind of crack you smokin'?
Thanks for the warning.
I find it funny how much AI relys so much on taking work from humans. Like why couldn't the scammer just prompt the art out of thin air instead of DMing actual artist for sketches.
This is a good question.
These kind of "hustlers" are getting out of hand.
Thank you for this!! I'm considering starting commissions for the first time this year and avoiding scams is gonna be crucial since I'm not experienced with identifying them, the advice at the end was extremely useful since I was worried about people using sketches I produce in a way I don't condone
I'm glad it was helpful!
Unfortunately tools like glaze and nightshade are only marginally effective at best, and pretty much only to combat ai training, not img 2 img which is what this was. Huge watermarks should be at least partially effective. But yeah payment upfront (even just 50-50) is by far the best one. These people don't want to spend a DIME
I have the best defence to fend off scammers. I'm so fucking bad at drawing that nobody even commissions me
But like...Why...Do they even need to scam somebody like this?
If they're finding it difficult to get a specific image they can just use controlnet and some sort of posing software, as well as custom models and LoRAs. I'm not really sure what the point of this is, it's just incredibly unproductive for both parties.
Another reason I'm skeptical of this story.
what are you skeptical about they showed proof@@botarakutabi1199
This is sort of important to charge for sketches too. Not full price of course, but if it takes you 3h to make a sketch and present idea for the final painting - charge for it. This way anyone who tried to scam you will retreat because - you can still press charges and file lawsuit if the art was sold to a third party especially if the art was sold using theft (claiming that you're the OG artist is theft even if you mauled the sketch with the AI) as you're not forfeiting your copyright by default unless you signed a legally binding document that the drawing will have a new copyright holder the moment financial exchange completes. You have a lot of evidence of the wrongdoing and I highly recommend everyone to remember that you're not defenseless in this whole fight, and the scam is not able to sustain itself for much longer - you're the OG artist, you can prove any minute that you're the creator, the person stealing cannot.
that, or just plaster some watermarks on it ;P
a person could see through the watermarks, and have an idea what it will look like, but it would totally ruin the AI trying to "enhance" it, lol, and if you want watermark-free image, then pay up, best of both worlds, if they're gonna scam, they're unlikely to want to actually pay up, but if they are really interested, they can still give feedback what they want changed
@@jan_harald watermarks don't work as proven many times, the work could have your name plastered all over it and they'd still use it and someone still would pay for this crap. I think we've handled enough of the mistreatment and nonsense, and I highly encourage any artist who has ever been mistreated to take matters into their hands and force real consequences either by using small claims court or no win no fee copyright lawyers.
I have AI locally installed on my PC. I have no idea why these guys go into all of that trouble when nowadays you can draw a stick figure yourself and AI will make it into a masterpiece. If you know how to use the tool its pretty simple.
Ai actually gets people’s art then jumbles it up into another piece of art and if it continues art will never be original again AND it will continue to go through this rabbit whole of weirdness
@@GLIXCH1812 That's the main issue with current AI systems. Even if they iron out the errors, due to how it floods the internet with its own images, it can never be original and it will start to feed its own garbage into the system leading to pumping out even more garbage that gets fed back in. And its not like actual artists aren't out there anymore, but they get overwhelmed by AI that any AI algorithm would just not weigh actual artwork appropriately.
For something unique and creative, you would have to start approaching actual general intelligence(ie. capable of wide range of tasks). That would be a HUGE breakthrough but would be even more disruptive than robotic manufacturing or the current AI art/text/voice situation.
ik that i’m just explaining it to this guy but i’m not that good in explaining Sorry! qwq@@neurofiedyamato8763
The fricking typos though 😂😂😂 whole bodyml got me so hard
Hey, as someone who trains AI models for personal use, I just want to say that the big, obnoxious watermarks is the only way you're gonna get around people using your art. They found a way around glaze and I'm sure that if I had enough time I could even get the AI to ignore a lot of the small watermarks. But big ones are a pain and people will usually just skip over those images.
watermarks also can be removed with inpainting
@@deltaxcd yeah, that's why I said the big, obnoxious ones. the kind you can't magically scrub that away with photoshop in one click. if you have to spend more than 10 minutes getting rid of it, it's a no-go imo. more trouble than it's worth.
Maybe Low quality art with a big watermark can help
@@chubbydunkers78 Why do yu even mention photoshop? watermark are removed with for example llama-cleaner or you can use stable diffusion too
Yeah it just sucks that you have to essentially post a lesser version of your art if you are really adamant about not getting your art put in a dataset@@canelitaa5337
I've been doing comms for a couple of years now so I'd have declined after that second email with the weird keywords because that's weird as hell. But why would you send such a detailed sketch before receiving any payment at all from a total stranger? I don't understand, that looked good enough to be used even without AI tampering tbh, as suggestions said at the very least do half payment upfront unless you're dealing with someone you trust very much.
Makes me think this story isn't completely true, but i guess the warning is still good.
i've seen people count other things as sketches and not just the base idea, though they probably were never scammed before (in commissions) so they didn't think to just do half and half or full payment on front.
danm i get those messages from art station and i never reply because people ask me for pieces of my portfolio to turn them into NFT and wtf is that i can barely speak English. Some others offer me to pay with crypto coins is that even posible? im a third world country artist so im probably living in the rock era yet. But yea everything is shady as fuck these days.
You can't really copy an artstyle or character with just one sketch, their only option is to use controlnet to make an image based on a sketch. There's no way to make this stuff financialy sustainable, cuz you will need a constant stream of dumb people to buy low-quality stuff.
How you can avoid your art being stolen by AI:
1. Try classic drawing lessons. Find people to model for you, draw still life, draw what you see.
2. Avoid Deviantart like hell. Even if you make art friends online try to meet and draw together in real life. This way all your styles evolve past the texture skills easier and, maybe, you can collaborte making bigger projects and not just commisions. Try to be a team person.
3. Do not imitate anime art nor copy any other already existing art styles. Do it only as an exercise. You don't chose your style, your style choses you. If you love manga style and japanese culture try to learn from the best and not any online deadface "artist".
4. Study Art History
This way you are avoiding your drawings (your art for Americans) looking already like AI drawings.
Welcome to the AI wars! Its tougher than ever to be an artist now! Im still up for it however!
Same, lowkey, none of this ai stuff personally bothers me as an artist. But then again, neither did tracing. I'm going to keep making art, no matter what ai does. And the best part, I can even use ai as a tool sometimes. Making collages with ai images is fun, like cutting and pasting magazines, but the magazines are real;y weird.
LOL, sure tougher than ever? I wish all of the unrecognized and even recognized after death artists could hear you now.
@@ImmacHn if they could hear me, what would the reply be? 🌝
@@botarakutabi1199 that's the spirit!
Im sorry but the way they typed their messages made me laugh so hard bro 😭
This is sad, This is one of the many reasons why I don't like or consume absolutely anything made by AI.
People will type "autumn winter", AI will generate STOLEN ART, and they will think that the AI is a very good at generating art.
Feels bad, I hope this didn't affect you too much.
girl..do yourself a favor and take 100% pay upfront 🙏🙏
So somebody asks you to draw something and you come up with a generic ass anime girl portrait and they never pay you. So where, in that, does AI come in? It makes no sense. I can have my PC shit out 50 images like the one you did in 10 minutes. Scamming an artist is just so much more work.
I mean the emails are sus AF. But I don’t get how winter and autumn are polar opposites, they blend into each other.
When drawing stuff they often end up using opposing color palettes or moods and atmosphere that clash into each other is more the problem, like from the standpoint of the first image you think of when you first see those words is probably mid autumn and mid winter. So warm toned saturated palletes and sunny patches and snow and clouds or cold, dark lighting. You get me? It would take a couple thumbnail sketches and ref pictures to get that late autumn, bright winter vibe right if you don’t immediately already have something in mind. It’s tricky and uncommon but not impossible!
The whole list is literally just AI prompts though- it was probably copy pasted from a prompt they tried to get an AI to do but when they didn’t get what they wanted they contacted an artist to steal because apparently stealing from thousands of artist already wasn’t enough lmfao.
cant ai just use an artist's instagram pictures instead, isn't that enough training? why would a single sketch satisfy them?
i'm not sure i quite fully understand the function of such a scam, it would be significantly easier to just fully generate ai content via directly stealing your artwork to train into a style model like a LoRA. If an AI bro is so bad at prompt engineering or so bad with his tools that he actually needs to involve himself to commission an artist, I have a suspicion that the scam runs potentially deeper than just stealing art, perhaps it's phishing as well, especially if you provided your details for payment.
keep yourself safe!
Honestly this scam here is just even more evidence that these AI bros are just stealing from artists in general. Like, good luck trying to convince me that this IS NOT theft. They're even trying to steal art that ISN'T already in the datasets.
I literally commented about my thoughts on generated art in a separate video and holy crap I was right. As an artist, I am absolutely baffled at the audacity of these types of people who do these types of things. So many people don't understand the process, pain, or love that goes through making art. The people trying to not make this such a big of a deal just don't understand that stealing art is stealing art and it doesn't matter if it's with ai or not, the artist spent time and effort on that and it should not be so soullessly recreated or taken.
I'm not even surprised anymore.
Glaze doesn't work.
i instead got scammed on 3 out of 8 artists i did request the commissions...
Jesus Christ, I'm so sorry this happened to you! I wish every scammer (especially AI A-holes) a very bankruptcy
As somebody who uses AI all of the fucking time...
You still need human DECISION making when it comes to GenAI shit. The correct response to this is to crank up the price for a sketch because it contains most of the key artistic DECISIONS. I don't think the arms race approach is the right answer, look at what happened to musicians getting their music stolen.
Question?: "How to avoid AI scam?"
Others: "This is what you can do to avoid this."
Introverts: ".... Don't talk. Ez."
hmm Heres what 2 do : 1 SEND THEM THE WORST DRAWING EVER and keep the original like draw it then just make a stick figure lol
Ikd about ai as a whole for art, but i use it in 3 key ways. Generating character reference sheets of characters i want to make but have zero idea how they would look, for coloring my work since i am bad at colored art, and hyper detailed promotional covers for my own projects i did draw. Heck, my current pfp is an ai rendition of my vtuber model i made myself, that i couldn't draw because my tablet is busted.
I'm hating these ai cheapers now... Randomly i commented on someone's video on RUclips by saying my interests in illustrator... As the video was based on personal interests... Someone replied me saying illustrators don't have any career... As there are many ai tools people use.... At this point I felt too much demotivated... Also on my Instagram recommendations now I get these ai cheapers... I'm starting to hate them even more now... Sometimes I wanna just report everyone 😂
what is your opinion on people who order a commission and give AI images as reference for the base concept of the character (but tell you that it's AI? Would you be mad or would you be fine with it because the person used AI for the idea but wants to pay for an human made version.
The lesson I got from this was....avoid people with bad typing.....also trademark your art....
bruh, I dont understand the scam. AI can generate images from 0 using the words the "ai" or scammer sent you and people can go even further with "hallucinations" (like magnific or krea) in your own PC using Stable Diffusion models for even better results in terms of detail. I think you got scammed sure, but the AI bro is plain stupid. He he is too lazy to write a prompt or even ask AI to create a prompt for him using the keywords and the style he is looking for. My bet is there is something else going on.
Why did you even reply to the first email? No way I would touch a request like that.
Or even draw AND color without getting at least 50% of the money beforehand
I'm from the ai "bro" side of thing. I just fallen in love with it cause it was just a fun toy.
I do feel that problem as an "artist" did the same to me in some way.
Like he knew i did AI but i sucked at drawing. So i asked a lineart/sketches of his preference for 15$ so i could complete it with my 3D reference. (I would have asked more if the job were made)
i got refunded by Paypal since he goested me 7days.
I had never done a commission before ai or even 1 year after.
Good platform and feedback is king for trust.
Ok here are truths about all those "how to avoid":
glaze- will not help it is for training AI not for completing sketches
watermarks - will not help they can be removed by the same AI inpainting so say bye bye to watermarks in general.
the rest is just same as closing commissions
maybe one wasy how it could work if you send just half of the image as in that case AI will have trouble to create another half
it woud be how much you pay that much of the image you get LOL
Forget stuff like "huge watermark". You'll still have lost your time. Anyone serious will know your art style already and should be willing to at least pay 50% up front. If not, those people are gonna be a pain to deal with anyways.
If I was in this situation, I'd make the most purposefully awful art, anatomy problems, incorrect shading, uncanny facial features, all on purpose, so I could mess up the AI software as much as I can 😈😇
my stupid bilingual brain read the thumbnail as "i stole my art" and I was very confused
That's awful! And your work is so beautiful! Thank you for showing us your experience so we can learn from it 💖
"whole bodyml"
Dude you don't send a picture before some cash is sent. Commission 101
just make a really BAD rough sketch and keep the bright, obnoxious watermarks
Thanks for this
of course!
You could also maybe just take a picture of the screen instead of sending the digital image to even further obscure it. (I would still put the filter on top, though....man this is just sad )
Actually this is pretty old scam scheme that just slightly changed with shitty ai touch and therefore it became even worse.
In the original scheme the scammer looks for an artist, usually middle skilled not very popular and with underpriced comissions and then sells this comission by higher price to other person that thinks they're buying comission directly from an artist but OH NO there's a parasite scammer in between
This scheme was kind of a cancer in art community of post-soviet countries, scammers often used to order comission in cheaper local currencies and then sold them in usd
Ok I just wanna say this is completely off topic *BUT*
I wanna eat ur art so bad it just looks delicious
Lol I gave up on art a long time ago cuz i suck, I burned all my art I made from high school to about 20, maybe it was a good idea to burn it all. All this AI stuff is making me feel like shits just gonna get worse and worse
Yeah, as others say. Take a deposit, even if it's a trivially small amount for a regular person. The scammers don't want to spend even a tiny amount of money because they are operating out of places like India.
I've also heard charging for sketches. Although that may be less and less reliable as machines can do more with less.
Either that or hike the rate by 80%, and then add tons of hidden middle fingers to it.
charging for sketches is also a smart way to go definitely!
@@viyaura
that, or just plaster some watermarks on it ;P
a person could see through the watermarks, and have an idea what it will look like, but it would totally ruin the AI trying to "enhance" it, lol, and if you want watermark-free image, then pay up, best of both worlds, if they're gonna scam, they're unlikely to want to actually pay up, but if they are really interested, they can still give feedback what they want changed
I mean, after they talk to you in THAT kind of English, you can safely protect yourself from a scam by just ghosting them from the start. It's very unlikely that a person that doesn't even care to speak like a human to you will pay you anything or be any decent further.
Also I tried to find AI to finish up my sketches, but I found nothing that would work any decently :( My point is, it's much more useful than detrimental imo, but where do these AI bros even finish their sketches?
TOTALLY SLAP A BIG FAT WATERMARK!!! MAKE IT AS OBNOXIOUS AS YOU CAN!!! ... but seriously do whatever it takes to protect your art. If the customer cant understand and be accommodating then something is sus.
How to not get stolen?, Simply don't frickin post it online
You should always take some payment before you start doing any work whatsoever.
I'll make sure to never commission someone with bad grammar.
I've had non english speakers type like that, or machine translate like that, but yeah, beware.
In such a world so full of horrid people. I'd always say at the very least ask for half pay if not full pay upfront.
Why do you spend hours making a drawing for free to a super weird message?
Dont worry ai will crack all those stupid Tools 😂 if not you can fix most of the added crap from those Tools with Photoshop
When it comes to commissions, it's usually standard practice to have some form of upfront payment first before fully engaging the artwork process. Also, the way the email was worded was really suspicious like they were thinking that they were "feeding prompts" to a human artist like they would with a computer... that's irksome in all sorts of ways possible. :/
this makes absolutely no sense. You can easily generate illustration without real human drawn sketch. No sense at all.
Okay but why do all AI need to be screenwriters, like can't we make an AI that does something useful like picking up trash or smthn, just let the peacful and easy(ish) jobs to the humans
because capitalism. the owners of companies want to make as much money as possible, so they have the least amount of employees they have to pay. It's easier to pay very little to workers of menial jobs, that's why they aren't being replaced first.
Glaze won't work for this, it ruins the training not image to image inferences
Take it from an AI Bro
You would have made some money if you spent it on drawing instead of writing those dumb emails.
this honestly seems like more work than it was worth. wow.
Half payment up front then send sketches. 😭 Never start on something without payment!!! That's how I've avoided getting scammed.
Ah yes we as artists should definitely stop doing commissions because ai as if we are the problem 💀
I don't do commissions but that made me a bit irritated.
Next time be careful before giving out free examples xd
There is no protective layer”” you can use on ai, I’m telling you as someone who has trained ai models etc the best thing to do is use those big nasty water marks
A giant ass obnoxious watermark would work good as a protective layer.
yeah getting scammed by AI bros must feel really bad :/
Your mom is the MVP
Ngl i kinda hate A.I now days 🙃 (😭)
I wish a.i doesn't do anything worse and bad for human and stuff 😕
All my homies hate AI. Down with the machines.
Never before have I related to the phrase "rage against the machine" so much.
@@costelinha1867 Indeed.
Good news for AI. We need more free art
Ngl neon purplish divine sounds like a cool idea, imagine a cyberpunk deity
meanwhile a few days before this: ruclips.net/video/TQOzBLjnQ6g/видео.html how to tell if an artwork is ai generated
lol