How many did you guess right? ALSO I WANTED TO CLEAR SOMETHING UP - I wasn't calling the actual image of miku AI art. It was just a joke to call miku AI since she's not technically human (Ik she isnt actually AI LOL) (and im aware that image of miku is the original design)
Hi, I'm Pinlin, the artist at 15:47 . Both of you pointed straight out my art is real 😂I'm glad that the little details in my work are noticed. I place each element carefully in the composition. Thank you for bringing attention to art made by people.
It's so scary seeing how advanced AI is becoming, especially when you are someone who has dedicated a long section of their life to their work, like how all professional artists have done. The good thing is that AI can never replicate the effort and time a real person puts into their work, weather you are an architect, a content creator or even if you are just starting in fast food, humans are social animals, and we rely on each other to feel needed. So how about you guys and or gals, do something AI can't, go out there and compliment someone, it can be anyone. Sona, your art is truly amazing 💜
I thought this was AI generated until I saw "weather", I think mistakes is what makes us humans, and unless AI learns how to make mistakes or humanity learns how to be perfect, mistakes is what will differentiate us from AI
@@karl6683 You don't get my point, talk about something unrelated and like your own comment :) I did watch the video before going to the comments, thanks.
This Miku art is Miku's original design! It was created for her first voicebank, which released in 2007 for the Vocaloid 2 engine. It was drawn by Kei Garou, aka KEI. Just wanted to put that out there since the video didn't plug the illustrator.
@@ClarelySuperior 1. Did you watch The Video? It did Say That. 2. I do see people call Miku AI or Robot,which is half True But Not really. 3.Thanks For the Compliment. ^^
I noticed a difference between AI and real art. When looking at the background of reality faraway terrain. Look at the detail level if the detail level stays hyper realistic and the background is a painting in itself then it’s AI. But of the details get a little blurry and blocky and a bit unfinished then that is the artist not wanting to spend days making paintings within painting that are hyper realistic. And their canvas can’t zoom in anymore. :)
One of many indicators. "Ai" has no concept for... concepts. It's pattern recognition and regurgitation. Blabbering like a parrot. Have you also noticed that the Will Smith one is also AI generated? Whoever made this quiz got tricked as well.
still glad that ai makes a real artist wont and really messes up on things that arent anime or something widely drawn. I just know that one space one was suppose to be the deathstar. Then the spider one was too unique to be ai
I feel like I could tell for most if not all of them from vibes alone. You can tell when stylistic choices have intention behind them. A lot of AI “art” has very boring composition, you can’t really tell why the art exists. (If that makes sense) Also the shape language is more interesting in real art. I think this is why people often comment that AI has no “soul”.
I know a great way to tell if art is AI or a real person who made it; the K.I.S.S. rule. It stands for "Keep It Simple, Stupid" meaning if something isn't the main focus of the drawing, keep it as simple as possible, so if the background is way, way, WAY too detailed, AI made it. A great example of the K.I.S.S. rule is in 11:23, where the eye in the center is detailed, but the stuff around it is dots of color.
It is getting a bit more difficult to pinpoint ai art from real art. While we can still look deep into an image for what I call ‘purposeless’ strokes to tell if it’s ai who knows if it will advance to the point where that won’t be a good hint anymore. Crazy times.
AI is a lot better at general realism than digital art and stuff like the spider. The realistic stuff got me sometimes but I could immediately tell everything else. Like in the giant eye landscape thing I don't know if AI could've placed down those brush strokes with that much intent or made that swirling pattern that clean. And in the Spongebob one the style and rendering is just so unique, the hand isn't a mess and there were reflections in the eyes that I don't think an AI would've added, not to mention the neat composition. AI is getting eerily close to being indistinguishable to real art but it's not quite there. Insane to see how far this technology has come.
Quick question: You know how you did that face reveal? (And you look absolutely stunning) Are you gonna use face cam in your videos at all? I rlly hope so! Thanks, Noah.
So I got them all right. The best way to tell Ai from real is to look at the lines. They should make sense and be consistent. Ai draws in high detail, but has no concept of the artistic principles. It's like someone who started drawing with advanced techniques without ever learning the basics. Those dried flowers were a good example. There is no way an Ai would be able to keep all those petals consistent in length, color, and overlap. Therefore, it must be real. But obviously people can make mistakes too, but because people learn basics first. You can judge if the detail is consistent with their basic artistic skill.
14:39 Please do me a favor and DO NOT Google that handle and click on the Tumblr link. It's someone showing pictures of their Playmobil toy figure next to dead small animals laying on the ground, some of them bloody and the figure is pretending to have murdered them, it's sick (in a bad way)
@@crybabyscomfortcrowdevery fucking comment in nearly every video I've come across has been a literal copy pasta. "👇" comments, "pregnant but delivers" comments, "got me rolling 😂" comments, so on.
I am not an artist and I have zero knowledge in art , but I can tell 80% of the time whether it's art or AI . AI art has what I can only call "harsh lighting" : the part of the model exposed to the light seems to be always roasting under a 200 volt light ball or stadium lighting and the contrast between the exposed part and the non-exposed part is pretty noticable and quite jaring , not as close to night and day lighting difference but it is still hard for it to be unnoticed . Real artists tend to have a softer lighting , the exposed part seems to be under a softer light source and the transition between exposed and unexposed part is smoother .(and I think with the level of light exposure of models in AI drawings , their unexposed part should be just pitch black).
This is both scary and a bit gratifying because as an artist I can easily tell what is and isn't AI at a simple glance and non-artist can gut feel the wrong feeling. But at the same time it's frightening because non-artist DO have a hard time seeing it and can just as easily be fooled.
(I'm commenting my guesses as I watch through the video) 1 - AI...it loves drawing like that and there's so many things going on. A samauri AND a soldier AND whatever other wierd stuff is in that outift? (This was mostly a random guess, theres not much to go off of) 2 - AI. Most of the piece shows AMAZING lighting work, but someone with that level of skill would notice that they highlighted the metal thing as if the symbol was poking out, not indented. Also, a strand of hair blends into one of the brow wrinkles. 3 - AI, I think? The white strands are very confusing. Is it AI trying to make drawstrings for the hoodie, or does the character have a ribbon on the other side? 4 - Real. AI wouldn't make thin petals... that's like the one thing I can trust it on, is not messing up basic flowers that it has been fed 10 bajillion pictures of 5 - AI. What the hell are those irises and pupils lol 6 - AI. Both ends of the violin are in the water, but not the middle, why is it curved like that? And why is the bow tilted so that knly half is submerged? Why is the nose upsidedown and blurred at the top? Also, it's a really common AI style. ALSO WHY ARE THERE FOUR STRINGS BUT FIVE TUNER KNOBS 7 - AI... just, AI.
The way I can tell something’s AI or not is the way it’s composed. Usually in AI, they wouldn’t know why something or someone was placed in a scene, since all they do is take other images from what they were fed to match it with whatever description was typed. A real artist would know where to place and put things in their scene, they know how to lead the viewer’s eye. For example, the detailed caves one lead my eye around the whole work. AI wouldn’t know how to do that. So yeah, great video! 👍
How many did you guess right?
ALSO I WANTED TO CLEAR SOMETHING UP - I wasn't calling the actual image of miku AI art. It was just a joke to call miku AI since she's not technically human (Ik she isnt actually AI LOL)
(and im aware that image of miku is the original design)
Hi Sona! love the vids
.
(Ok so i got either 23 or 24 (i got confused by the ending), which im surprised i got that many)
I love your videos and you have also pretty much taught me a new way of how to color and shade because I suck at that stuff, thank you
Hi sona I love your videos they make me smile and happy
I hope my brothers buy me these for christmas
Hi, I'm Pinlin, the artist at 15:47 . Both of you pointed straight out my art is real 😂I'm glad that the little details in my work are noticed. I place each element carefully in the composition. Thank you for bringing attention to art made by people.
wow youre a great artist 😊
Yasss
I'm jealous 😭😭
Your art is really good
Amazing art lol🤩
It's so scary seeing how advanced AI is becoming, especially when you are someone who has dedicated a long section of their life to their work, like how all professional artists have done. The good thing is that AI can never replicate the effort and time a real person puts into their work, weather you are an architect, a content creator or even if you are just starting in fast food, humans are social animals, and we rely on each other to feel needed. So how about you guys and or gals, do something AI can't, go out there and compliment someone, it can be anyone.
Sona, your art is truly amazing
💜
I thought this was AI generated until I saw "weather", I think mistakes is what makes us humans, and unless AI learns how to make mistakes or humanity learns how to be perfect, mistakes is what will differentiate us from AI
true true@@Davian2073
@@Davian2073did u even watch the video ur commenting on lmao ai makes mistakes all the time
@@karl6683 You don't get my point, talk about something unrelated and like your own comment :)
I did watch the video before going to the comments, thanks.
@@karl6683 um *i* make mistakes all the time. So am I AI?
This Miku art is Miku's original design! It was created for her first voicebank, which released in 2007 for the Vocaloid 2 engine. It was drawn by Kei Garou, aka KEI. Just wanted to put that out there since the video didn't plug the illustrator.
And Miku Isn’t AI,She is Voiced by a Real person (i think her name is Saki?)
@@-Bora_Aliha-no one said that bro
@@-Bora_Aliha-also airi pfp, nice
@@ClarelySuperior 1. Did you watch The Video? It did Say That.
2. I do see people call Miku AI or Robot,which is half True But Not really.
3.Thanks For the Compliment. ^^
@@-Bora_Aliha- ngl i thought you were referring to the comment, i skipped that part of the video 💀my bad
Miku is never canonically described as an AI. She's just Miku.
Yeah shes not really an ai since she is a software where YOU have to do it on your own
Isn’t her story about her as a robot going back in time because the future had no music or something???
@@riv3r_mango705 No. She has no canon story.
Ooh e ooh
@@riv3r_mango705 No, that's a song, because miku is a voicebank and anyone can buy her to do their own songs
Looks like a fun challenge! Its kinda like the cake or not cake challenge that was way back when
I noticed a difference between AI and real art. When looking at the background of reality faraway terrain. Look at the detail level if the detail level stays hyper realistic and the background is a painting in itself then it’s AI. But of the details get a little blurry and blocky and a bit unfinished then that is the artist not wanting to spend days making paintings within painting that are hyper realistic. And their canvas can’t zoom in anymore. :)
One of many indicators. "Ai" has no concept for... concepts. It's pattern recognition and regurgitation. Blabbering like a parrot.
Have you also noticed that the Will Smith one is also AI generated? Whoever made this quiz got tricked as well.
Sky children of the light fan! Hello!
7:30 THIS IS LIKE THE ORIGINAL MIKU IMAGE LOL
Yes, it's her design from her original voicebank, which was released in 2007 for Vocaloid 2. The image was drawn by Kei Garou, aka KEI.
Fr honestly
I KNOW WE WERE MAKING A JOKE LOL of the possibility of it being a duplicate to trick us
Im a hardcore miku fan myself
@@SonaDrawzStuffYTwho isn’t a hardcore miku fan 💪
Always hype when Gabe pulls up
Yeah he swag like that
@@SonaDrawzStuffYTfrfr
@@SonaDrawzStuffYT SWAGY BROSKI TO THE MAX
Fr
@@SonaDrawzStuffYTik :3
17:39 they don’t even realize he got like 8 fingers per hand and they got it right anyway 😂
Loll
I KNOWW I WAS LIKE YOUR NOT NOTICEING THE HAND?
I also noticed that LOL
I was waiting for them to point it out
@@emmaaxolotl*noticing
14:34 is AI art 100%. Looked it up and it's untagged. Plaiemobile is bullshitting people, like so many others.
i thought so too, was so confused when they revealed the "correct" answer
This one threw me off so bad. If that counts as real, then Cthulhu is real.
yeah, if this is real, then blink from wcue is real.
The one with the violin is obviously real because the violin structure and string/peg number is accurate(Violinist here)
yeah i came to the same conculsion
also i was just watching 2set violin lol
Same here
Lol I even looked up a violin to make the final guess
still glad that ai makes a real artist wont and really messes up on things that arent anime or something widely drawn. I just know that one space one was suppose to be the deathstar. Then the spider one was too unique to be ai
4:23 just wanted to point out thats how violins are built 😭😭
fr I play violin
17:28 love the fact that they ignored the 7 fingers 😍😍😍
I feel like I could tell for most if not all of them from vibes alone. You can tell when stylistic choices have intention behind them. A lot of AI “art” has very boring composition, you can’t really tell why the art exists. (If that makes sense) Also the shape language is more interesting in real art. I think this is why people often comment that AI has no “soul”.
4:43 bro brought half of our childhood back to us
you are ground
for 999999999999999999699999999999999 years
I like how near the end she switched to her old art page RUclipsr
12:16 *”KAME AME POOP OUT OF MY HANDS!!!”* -Gabe
I know a great way to tell if art is AI or a real person who made it; the K.I.S.S. rule. It stands for "Keep It Simple, Stupid" meaning if something isn't the main focus of the drawing, keep it as simple as possible, so if the background is way, way, WAY too detailed, AI made it. A great example of the K.I.S.S. rule is in 11:23, where the eye in the center is detailed, but the stuff around it is dots of color.
3:49 I haven't watched your lie in april in so long, this brought some memories
Sona: I say what ever I want
Gabe: Money for fun 👆🤓
love how I was able to recognize the Rosuuri art as real from her horizontal blush lines, her art is so amazing :D
i dont think that hatsune miku is ai
HELP WHY IS THIS THE TOP COMMENT IF IT ONLY HAS 6 LIKES????
@@karl6683 FR WHAT?😃
IKR@@karl6683
Miku IS a ai.
She's a voice synthesizer (or idk) Like a digital instrument but instead of an instrument it's a voice
Ok, fun video but hearing people unironically call Hatsune Miku AI kinda makes me wanna scream inside lol
“yeah we’re gonna die “ - Gabe, 2023
Gabe just going everywhere, and have a wizard outfit drawn on him, it just makes me happy
2:38 **gabe cutely sings-**
Sona: SHUT UP.
A good way to tell if it’s AI “art” is when you look at the actual picture normally it has this weird nonrealistic dreamy affect around it
Gabe just be making me laugh the whole time
3:36 WHAT IS THAT😭😭😭💀💀💀
How have you not heard of the glibgogabgolab before ☹️
I think Sona needs to realize that nobody is perfect at drawing
In 2:04 the other nostril is there, it’s just really really faint cause of the lighting :)
It's also a side profile
6:12 the way he said "yeah were gonna die 😊" is just too innocent but evil at the same time
Miku isn't an AI 😭shes a vocal synth but not an AI
3:13 i wanted to believe this was real so bad 😭
-< explodes in -*-PICKLE RIIIIIIIIICK-*- >- “✨Mr. Kraaaaabs✨”
It is getting a bit more difficult to pinpoint ai art from real art. While we can still look deep into an image for what I call ‘purposeless’ strokes to tell if it’s ai who knows if it will advance to the point where that won’t be a good hint anymore. Crazy times.
She has the power of anything in her fingers, but decides to draw for the internet.
4:44 omg the goanimate i cannot😭 (my sis watches it all day every day like a big abck)
AI is a lot better at general realism than digital art and stuff like the spider. The realistic stuff got me sometimes but I could immediately tell everything else. Like in the giant eye landscape thing I don't know if AI could've placed down those brush strokes with that much intent or made that swirling pattern that clean. And in the Spongebob one the style and rendering is just so unique, the hand isn't a mess and there were reflections in the eyes that I don't think an AI would've added, not to mention the neat composition. AI is getting eerily close to being indistinguishable to real art but it's not quite there. Insane to see how far this technology has come.
7:43 NAH THAT'S THE OFFICIAL ART
Quick question: You know how you did that face reveal? (And you look absolutely stunning)
Are you gonna use face cam in your videos at all? I rlly hope so!
Thanks,
Noah.
She actually has already a few times!
Sona: hey broskis it's me sona☺️
Gabe: AND MR GABE!!!! >:)
0:00
2:38
LOL
0:50 a dead giveaway was itachi didnt have any sharingan
So I got them all right.
The best way to tell Ai from real is to look at the lines. They should make sense and be consistent. Ai draws in high detail, but has no concept of the artistic principles. It's like someone who started drawing with advanced techniques without ever learning the basics.
Those dried flowers were a good example. There is no way an Ai would be able to keep all those petals consistent in length, color, and overlap. Therefore, it must be real.
But obviously people can make mistakes too, but because people learn basics first. You can judge if the detail is consistent with their basic artistic skill.
ngl AI has like a standard art style so its actually very easy to spot if smth is AI or not
14:39 Please do me a favor and DO NOT Google that handle and click on the Tumblr link.
It's someone showing pictures of their Playmobil toy figure next to dead small animals laying on the ground, some of them bloody and the figure is pretending to have murdered them, it's sick (in a bad way)
I am cracking up right now because of Gabe
Sona may not be pregnant, but she always delivers
bro can people stop saying this it's really annoying
@@crybabyscomfortcrowdsay that to flamingos comment section, it’s the same thing. Not gonna do anything.
@@D3X101 ik but still
she is idkwym
@@crybabyscomfortcrowdevery fucking comment in nearly every video I've come across has been a literal copy pasta. "👇" comments, "pregnant but delivers" comments, "got me rolling 😂" comments, so on.
“Yea we’re gonna die” JUST HAD MY CRACKING UP SOOOOOO MUCH 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
4:10 it could be a hair tie
16:47 I am offended I CAN DRAW STAIRS
4:42 idk why but this made me laugh
I am not an artist and I have zero knowledge in art , but I can tell 80% of the time whether it's art or AI .
AI art has what I can only call "harsh lighting" : the part of the model exposed to the light seems to be always roasting under a 200 volt light ball or stadium lighting and the contrast between the exposed part and the non-exposed part is pretty noticable and quite jaring , not as close to night and day lighting difference but it is still hard for it to be unnoticed .
Real artists tend to have a softer lighting , the exposed part seems to be under a softer light source and the transition between exposed and unexposed part is smoother .(and I think with the level of light exposure of models in AI drawings , their unexposed part should be just pitch black).
18:06 I think the user didn’t appear because they didn’t putt AI they put ai.
Love the utter chaos of Gabe
True😅
The “ AND GABE !” always gets me😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
destroy ai art
GET THE BOMBS
Correction, "Ai images" that is not art
@@Derpy-Bo1 why is it not art
@@nouey4361because nobody did this we say a robot produces food not robot cook it
@@CarmellaAyebie Sorry i don't speak "djsisidojad" please write this in english
Gabe : “I think it’s raining”
Sona : “you think?”
This is both scary and a bit gratifying because as an artist I can easily tell what is and isn't AI at a simple glance and non-artist can gut feel the wrong feeling. But at the same time it's frightening because non-artist DO have a hard time seeing it and can just as easily be fooled.
When you said “Aint no way someone’s eyelashes ain’t that long.” My eyelashes are almost that long 💀
I literally was playing a game called the AI Talkie while watching this lol!❤
that's embarrassing
@@xxpyraz I was just playing it for fun
@@xxpyrazwhat 💀
“IT PICKLE RICK!!!!!!!!” it caught me offguard, laughing so hard that I almost died-
No at 16:36 she shows her body😮😊
4:42 BRO PULLED UP MY CHILDHOOD
16:55 coming out the other side it's the light saver
"AND GABE" 😂 it's so good 👍 i laughed so hard it's to good 💯
who likes miku???? I DOOOOOOOO
🙋🏼♀️🙋🏼♀️🙋🏼♀️
Me 🙋🏻♀️🙋🏻♀️🙋🏻♀️🙋🏻♀️🙋♂️🙋🏻♀️🙋♂️🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋
MEEREEEEEEEeEEEeEE I LOVE MIKUUUuUuUU
MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Me
Can u do a part two to this? I love this vid! ❤
7:49 💀 isn’t this an official art release by the creator of the manga?
Or am I stupid 💀
Yea I thought so too
(I'm commenting my guesses as I watch through the video)
1 - AI...it loves drawing like that and there's so many things going on. A samauri AND a soldier AND whatever other wierd stuff is in that outift? (This was mostly a random guess, theres not much to go off of)
2 - AI. Most of the piece shows AMAZING lighting work, but someone with that level of skill would notice that they highlighted the metal thing as if the symbol was poking out, not indented. Also, a strand of hair blends into one of the brow wrinkles.
3 - AI, I think? The white strands are very confusing. Is it AI trying to make drawstrings for the hoodie, or does the character have a ribbon on the other side?
4 - Real. AI wouldn't make thin petals... that's like the one thing I can trust it on, is not messing up basic flowers that it has been fed 10 bajillion pictures of
5 - AI. What the hell are those irises and pupils lol
6 - AI. Both ends of the violin are in the water, but not the middle, why is it curved like that? And why is the bow tilted so that knly half is submerged? Why is the nose upsidedown and blurred at the top? Also, it's a really common AI style. ALSO WHY ARE THERE FOUR STRINGS BUT FIVE TUNER KNOBS
7 - AI... just, AI.
11:22 my eyelashes are that long 😢
When Gabe said "you could toast bread on that" me and sona said "what the hail" at the same time 😂
at 1:01 the leaf symbol is backwards
7:20 I love Miku tooooo 😭😭😭😭😭
The 2nd one is watermarked by ai “artist”, look up their user is comes up
1:42 Gabe reminds me of kyojuro/rengoku's dad :]
7:09 wait this one has no credit!....?
Bro when sona said glibglob something like that when sona said it I bursted out laughing I laughed so much that I almost on my food
Tbh, with how much AI is developing, I'd think it'd be a compliment if people thought my art was AI
"We're gonna die" had me dead XD
Wait that must be the point-
Ai is like. Life or death. No matter what you. How human or not it is. It's usually ai 😮
Gabe: “WOMAN GODZILLA! EVEN WORSE THEN NORMAL GODZILLA!” Me: “s3xism?”
Ai uses the same shades
This is so entertaining!!! I'm getting a bit more worried about AI than I originally was LOL...
Sona- "Ain't nobody have that long eyelashes"
Me- 👁️👄👁️ I feel so offended😭😭😭
3:55 the violin
Everyone who plays strings: *p a i n*
I call it "Ai generated images" not Art.
12:17 I NEVER LAUGHED SO HARD IN MY LIFE XDDDD
CANCEL GABE BUTTON
👇
The "weeeeee" Got me! Like when it looked like a star wars picture
13:41 OBVIOUSLY AI!! Like somethimes I even OVERESTIMATE AI lol!
10:10 is a masterpiece ✨️ of singing
The way I can tell something’s AI or not is the way it’s composed. Usually in AI, they wouldn’t know why something or someone was placed in a scene, since all they do is take other images from what they were fed to match it with whatever description was typed. A real artist would know where to place and put things in their scene, they know how to lead the viewer’s eye. For example, the detailed caves one lead my eye around the whole work. AI wouldn’t know how to do that.
So yeah, great video! 👍
It wasnt because of the waterrrrr its just a stylistic choiceee and how are you gonna fit the top part of thwt violin 4:56
7:30 bro that’s literally miku’s box art when she was created in 2007😭😭😭
4:41 the goanimate throwback is hella hilarious lmao
4:42 this feels so funny that I saw this reference before so I rolled off the couch to the floor to my Chromebook to see if it was a reference