3 Times Andy Murray Dominated The Big 3!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
- Three times Murray outclassed his closest rivals: Nadal, Federer, and Djokovic...SUBSCRIBE to our channel for the best ATP tennis videos and tennis highlights: ruclips.net/user/tennistv?sub_...
Watch official ATP tennis streams from every tournament: tnn.is/RUclips
Tennis TV is the OFFICIAL live streaming service of the ATP Tour.
Tennis TV features live streaming and video on demand of ATP tennis matches in full on PC, Mac, mobile & tablet apps on iOS & Android. Download the app to stream on your device: tnn.is/RUclips
Plus Tennis TV is also available to stream tennis on your TV on Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Samsung Smart TV, LG Smart TV, Android TV, Xbox One as well as AirPlay and Chromecast.
Get help on Tennis TV with our virtual assistant: tnn.is/help-youtube
Buy Tennis TV merchandise in our store: tnn.is/store-youtube
Watch the ATP Tour via your local TV broadcaster: go.watchtenn.is/atp?p=yt&sour...
To enquire about licensing ATP Tour footage contact IMG Replay: imgreplay.com/client/atp_media
#tennis #tennistv #sports 
Спорт
This video made me so happy. His greatness is often undermined due to recency bias. He was never the same after 2017 because of potentially career-ending injuries; but before that... People forget that between 2010-2017 it was never just the Big 3, but rather the Big 4... He competed in the strongest era of men's tennis next to the greatest 3 male players ever, and managed to win 3 Slams, 14 Masters, and 2 Olympic Golds, and 46 titles.
Sir Andy Murray, ladies and gentlemen, may we never forget how great he once was ❤
46 titles is insane
Fantasy. It was NEVER a big four. He kept getting stuffed in Grand Slam finals!!!
@@xav9258 yet he always kept getting to Grand Slam finals. Unlike other great players in his era, such as Ferrer, Tsonga, Berdych and del Potro. Also became the world no 1 for 40+ weeks while all members of Big3 were actively playing. No one claims he is better than them, but it's obvious he was at par with them during a point in his career.
Thank you! It was a big four up until 2017. Murray was winning everything, still getting to finals, was number one in the world and at the top of his game before that hip took it all away. He wasn’t an also ran, he was a contender. You don’t win 46 titles just by being ordinary.
It was never a big four because he was never really a threat as a slam contender
He beat Federer 11 times, Nadal 7 times, and Djokovic 11 times, great stuff.
👀👀👀👀👀👌👌👌👌
Meaning GOATdal was the best…
I do think, similar to Roger, Nadal got in Murray’s head for a long time. And Nadal’s forehand was the only shot that could consistently break down Murray’s backhand, in a way it didn’t with Novak’s. Murray still has many incredible wins over him though.
@@goldwolf0606 maybe you mean CLAYdal😂
@@goldwolf0606dude Murray played Novak more and it’s still 25 to 11
4th best player of the last 20 years
That’s an achievement
alcaraz
@@kingcuckoo No where near in last 20 years.
@@kingcuckoowank
@@GlasgowCeltic8867 Your hobby is your own business.
Peak Murray was unreal. He was definitely up there with the level of the big 3.
Surprised they missed out the Tokyo 2011 final that 3 set 6.0 against Nadal who only won 4 points in the whole set. I would have picked 2016 Apt finals over the clay one given the significance
No he wasn't lol
@@joshjones5062 2016 ATP finals was Novak just phoning it in. He tanked that match and couldn't care less, likely he was paid off by the ATP/Murray's team as well. They picked well to pick Rome 2016.
At the slams he really wasn’t. He had to rely on injuries and exhaustion on Novak’s part and Federer choking to win his slams.
@sleepyjoe9267 you take advantage can't cry about it he worked very hard
That Rome championship point will forever be the most spectacular.
People forget how good Andy was. From 2011-2017 it was the big 4. While maybe Andy wasnt as good as the other 3 as consistently, he was miles ahead of all the other players and alot of the time was on par with the top 3
After 2013 however, Wawrinka was basically just as good as him as far as being a contender for big titles. And a bigger threat to the Big 3 at slams. Murray was always a big threat to the big 3 at the Masters 1000s since 2007 though.
@@sleepyjoe9267 Not really. Murray won the same number of slams, got World No.1, and the ATP Finals Title. Even Wawrinka says it isn;t close.
@@thomasnorton-crossman2160 yes really. Murray is somewhat overrated. Wawrinka has more legendary wins and more feared by the Big 3.
@@sleepyjoe9267 murray has 14 masters compared to wawrinkas 1, has been world no 1 and won atp finals which wawrinka didnt. So yeah, murray is much better.
@@suryansdash5830 Wawrinka has better slam victories. Nobody remembers Masters (which I agree is unfair, but true).
The things you can do with two hips ... fun times.
I don’t know why it’s so hard for people to put respeck on his name. World class talent and world class guy
Peak Murray was soooo good. Better than Warwrinka no question about it
Gonna miss him for sure 😥
Yeahh 😢
Gotta appreciate Murray's return positioning coming forward instead of serving from home like most players do nowadays
For every sore hater -
He is the only player that made a dent when the other 3 were at their peak. 3 slams, 2 Olympic Gold in Singles, 14 masters, 1 Nitto Finals, and ended a year #1. 46 Titles, and This is while everyone was playing. Oh and 11 Grandslam Finals. It’s Sir Andy to You !
I only just found out that he won an Olympic Silver Medal as well :0
So did Tsonga or Del Potro, no one ever said they were one of the greatest.
@@masters.1000tsonga won 2 masters title and reached 1 g.s final. Del Potro achieved more than tsonga. He reached 2 slam finals and won 1, reached to world no.3 and won 1-2 masters titles. So yeah Sir Andy did way more than anyone in their time did against federer, nadal and djokovic and he deserves to be called one of the greatest to hold the racquet. 🙏
No he isn't; Stan won three slams beating two of the Big Three in Grand Slam finals. Murray kept getting stuffed in Grand Slam finals, like a prize turkey!!! The Olympics does not mean a lot in tennis history and only the final is over five sets.
@@xav9258Stan might have 3 slams but he only has 16 titles total. Murray has 3 slams, 46 titles total including 2 gold medals, a year end title and pretty much single handedly won the Davis Cup for GB. Plus he spent like 41 weeks at no 1. I like Stan but they’re not comparable. Not at all. Also anyone who says Olympics don’t matter is a clown. They do matter to the players, just ask Djokovic how much one would mean to him, or Federer who never won a singles gold. Stop being so bitter.
Andy he's one of the best player in history !! And we call federer, djokovic, nadal, Murray
" THE BIG 4"👏👏👏👏
idk if murray is the same caliber as the big 3 but def right behind them
More fantasy; it was NEVER a Big Four. Ridiculous British bias.
Dimitrov: ".... and Andy, and Andy... *wink*"
A Wonderful player. On This 3 time´s, He finally get all the best of his potencial
Such a great player. Finally reached his potential just as the hip gave way. What could have been.
The best amongst the mortals.
Wonderful stuff, wonderful guy!!❤❤
Awww ty I got my Murray fix for the day... wat a tennis IQ
あの時のマレーは強かった見てるこちらが本気で応援したくなるような選手だから引退は本当に残念で仕方がない😢
If it wasn’t for injury he’d won a lot more slams,nbr1 for a year and competing and regular beating big 3,great player loved watching him
Yup he was in the form of his life in 2016
@@wakaflockaprojectThe Olympics final against Del Potro was something else
5:54 This point reminds me of Jannik Sinner. It seems Sinner learned a thing or two (or more) from Murray. Andy’s IQ in these rallies is top notch. Definitely the BIG 4 is a fact.
To start the video with a MADRID WIN over Nadal, is CRAZY! Nadal holds one of the craziest records there. People don’t undeserving how good Murray was before his hip surgery.
Any top 30 player could have beaten that version of Nadal. He barely hit any ball past the service line
@@flanderstruck3751 funny
@@flanderstruck3751 Nadal prime was amongst those years. He was having one of the highest ELO ratings
@@Smileater 2015 is literally the worst year of his career lol, the total opposite of his prime.
Nice selection of matches, Andy won the last two by breaking Federer and Djokovic serve, which is amazing. He broke Nadal on clay more than thrice and those DROPSHOTS! (Andy’s favorite shot) are marvelous. You can see where Alcaraz and Sinner learned them from in order to beat Djokovic and top 10 players now. Sir Andy Murray, a legend of its own.
At this point in time, it was clearly a Big 4. Murry's injuries really stared to become unmanageable after be became World Number 1. He was Number 1 for almost a calendar year with the "Big 3" chasing him.
Prime Andy was a monster. He'd wipe the floor with most of the current crop of top players at his best.
And the most salty handshake at the net goes to Federer 😂
Andy was so fast back then
We will miss him
The last point is insane😱
Un talento innato
The point at 1:49 illustrates the way the Big Three used to play against Murray: diagonal forehand tennis to prevent his smooth backhand
It was a big 4. No doubt about it. His records alone say that. World No.1 amongst those three, and doing it by winning so much earned that spot
There never was.
@@masters.1000 always was. Don't be an idiot
@@sdstewart87 For the press and the idiots like you only.
3 Grand Slams vs 20+ says it all.
@@sdstewart87 There was. Stats do the lie. Ignorant tennis fans deny the factual truth: Federer and Nadal and Djokovic were in their respective peaks and Andy Murray was able to beat them MANY TIMES and in crucial matches. Just take a look at Fed-Nad-Djo ELO ratings at that time, Andy was able to beat them all in different occasions.
Maybe the worst world number one in Open Tennis history. And just three slams. Big Four is a complete fantasy. It's like saying Bojo always told the truth😛😛😛
Great reflexes from James Spader @11:05
And the fact his career was cut short while the big three had another 5+ years each tells a lot aswell.
He was already well past his prime when he got injured. His tenure as world number one was probably the worst in Open Tennis history.
@@xav9258 potentially the worst tennis take I have heard in my life
@@xav9258 what is bro waffling about
The greatest mortal to ever play tennis
Your name is apt, as that's where this ridiculous comment belongs😊
I most like if editor put Murray vs Djokovic ATP FINAL 2016.
More thriller & epic
Most importantly, he was able to beat them all on their favorite surface while they were at least close to their prime. For me, Murray was like "Djokovic light". He played an at least similar game, but he was not quite as good in most aspects. Nevertheless, great personality, great career and fun to watch.
Although djok is more successful thats a reductive summary. Murray hits far more shots and winners on the run than djok did for example, and his determination was more within points rather than over a game in terms of management, producing different styles to novak on clutch points. I don't think Murray controlled game like djokovic did, and thats not form intelligence but because fundamentally I think they approach players and matches differently. I think murrays cross court in general is a little preferred and id argue more varied than novak on forehand in particular, both very strong backhands. I think novak also tends to be happy to strike with the optimum timing, often keeping the ball central in early build up, whereas murray again I feel tend to go wide immediately or early, betting he can cover a return with pace.
@@robbie5181 I agree with everything you said and that is the reason why I phrased it "at least similar". Nevertheless, even Murray himself said in many interviews that Novak's and his game is very similar.
Murray for me was better than Novak on grass.
マレーはすごかったんだなあ
When you’re put in the band of the big four,and regular beat the other three and become world number 1 ,you are in the highest bracket of men’s tennis 🎾 and you as the individual will always have that no matter what,Andy Murray the boy from dunblane,did well oh yes of course the knighthood,who else will achieve that I wonder
If that hip had not give way. He would have def had 3 or more grand slams. That period where he became number 1 in the world, he was at least in that moment better than the big 3. Must be so disappointing for him knowing what could have been.
That Rome final looked & felt like hard court tennis.
The Shanghai final had really pacy points.
Is it just me or does clay court tennis feel faster, these days?
The hardest opponent for prime Big3 because hi in a Big4!!!
Then why did Djoko wipe the floor with him in so many Aussie Open finals?
@@xav9258 Why are you so mad you're replying to every positive comment about Andy??
Young Murray was so embarrassed to beat Federer for so long, he clearly found him intimidating, understandably!
I wish he was not injured this much
He is Big 4.
Unfortunately he fell short at the final hurdle against Djokovic and Federer. 10 grand slam finals v them but only 2 won. He could otherwise have been a real great.
I never understood why before ivan lendell came in he never played aggressively .
Now show us all the times the real top 3 have dominated the sweaty jock 😂
He would have won more trophies including Wimbledon if not for injuries so sad
I don't know how Nadal got to the final (Madrid-2015) with that game
When Murray misses a shot he does that pathetic limp every time
It was definitely a big 4. He was the best player in the world in 2016, world no1 and his body failed him. If you could build the perfect player from the top 4 you take Murray's backhand.
Big four ❤
Yeah, with his three slams. What a joke!
Top 3 now alcaraz, sinner & ….?
I'd put Zverev there
Rune and/or Fonseca if they sharpen up their game game a bit.
I realy dont like anyone at this time there isnt anyone that can make me stand up for him there was to many in the last 20 years but now its like kids playing the top
Zverev
What a legend. The only player to defeat novak so easily a couple of times. Roger, Novak, Rafa, Andy are the greatest players (of the last 20 years) in that order
sorry man but it's 1. Novak 2. rafa 3. roger 4. andy
Humbug!
This version of Nadal was trash but the other 2 were playing amazing and he destroyed both of them. Probably would have had around 12-15 GS titles in another era
Not with his really POOR attitude and mentality. All of his crazed mumbling rants...
Prime Andy just hit different ❤
Damn and he did it in finals murry is beast
Великий Энди
Andy Murray ❤❤❤❤
Murray is a bigger 1st serving, weaker forehand and less flexible at hips djokovic :) Imagine what he could've done if he used forehand better and didnt get hip replacement
Andy Murray is worse in almost every stat, including number of aces and first serve percentage
2012/13 is peak murray in terms of performance
Andy retired recently and who was there to wish him well: Novak Who chose not to attend : the bitter and twisted Feds and Rafa.....
muryGOAT
What about all the times they DESTROYED him...Like Djoko, in about four Aussie Open finals😛😊😛
So aarogant Murray. That s why placed 4th
The fact that he beat Nadal on clay is damn impressive
His win against Djokovic in 2016 is more impressive, Nadal in 2015 was very beatable
Are you going to show how many times Murray was beaten by each of the top three? 🤦🏼♂️
Any top 20 would've beaten Nadal if he was playing as he did in the first clip honestly. Barely any ball past the service line
first comment
The big 4 era has come to an end. Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray.
🧦Wool socks to bed = most rem sleep possible 🟪🟥
What kind of psychopath wears socks to bed?
GOATdal is the Djokovic Terminator, but Andy was the Weakvak punker 😂😂😂 and Roger was weakvaks daddy. Weakvak is so lucky they all got hurt.
Get a life
Who hurt you??
@@Ukenzion it looks like you forget 2011 who was who's terminator and anyway 24>22>20 so you can cry all you want and some people say nole fans are most toxic.
@@user-gr7jf8pq1o pardon??
What a nerd. Are we supposed to laugh or something? Fedal fans are honestly just weird. No respect for the game or other players. Truly a cancer to this sport with their toxicity.
Maybe he’s not the big 4, maybe a big 3.5 would work
Maybe a -3 would be better, with his paltry three slams.
@@xav9258 I WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU PLAY TENNIS NO UNDERSTNADING OF THE GAME
Overrated.
Severely overrated.
@@xav9258of course he was darling
Goodbye to the most boring player on the tour 😢
Lol he’s one of the best athletes to watch in sports that we’ve seen.
I'm not a fan of djokovic. Nothing about his game interests me
@@corey7219 similar to me I found roger game very boring
please stop comparing murray to the other 3. the fairest comparison is with stan wawrinka. there is too much difference between murray and the big three. Murray has only beaten Djokovic and Nadal twice in slams, and he has only beaten Federer once in slams. He has won 3 slams while the others are all at least 20 slams. In 2013 he won Wimbledon because Federer was injured and went out in the second round. And in the final he won against Djokovic who played the worst slam final of his career also due to the wind. In 2016 he won Wimbledon beating no one. took advantage of Djokovic's exit against Querrey and Federer's knee injury. Stan Wawrinka's slams have been much harder to get. There are no big four, only the big three.
its about the granularity of what the statement big 3 / 4 refers to. It is big 3 in terms of performance level and Grand slams. It is big 4 in terms of all ATP titles being acquired