It's called CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY, I wonder why this is so upsetting for some people when criminals have been carrying without a license since guns were invented.
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 Shall not be infringed! Where does it say you don't need a license to make your comment? Free speech is great too isn't it! You have the right to blow hot air without thinking all day long! Great isn't it!
@@calebwhite1999 they actually took a poll from their own anti-gun organization from 7,000 of there members then claim it was the whole of Texas, the community that vote in favor literally laughed at them for making the claims yet these 80%er still try passing off as truth
Not hard to get a bullseye at 5 feet with a Glock. I think you missed the part where he racked an already locked slide instead of using the slide release. I seriously doubt that dude knows anything about owning a handgun.
@@brandonmms Just because someone isn’t a masterclass NRA LEO SWAT SEAL Team master ninja descendent of Jerry Miculek doesn’t mean they don’t know their way around a handgun. Plenty of relatively untrained and inexperienced shooters can safely handle a pistol for their own defense.
She's upset because her husband's uncle shot himself? Could've jumped off a building; so let's just build bunkers. Could've taken a bunch if pills; so let's ban medicine. Could've jumped in front of traffic; so let's ban cars. People are so dumb, it's like a seat belt I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it. It's just a life saving TOOL.
Cause going after guns gives her something to do,,,,,,,,,,,and more importantly (for her) allows her to blame the su!c!de on something other than the root cause.
I don’t agree with her but I suggest you look at the rate of gun suicides in the US. It’s half of all gun deaths. Sure there are other ways but guns are way more accessible and you usually don’t botch the job. I know of several teenagers that took their lives with a gun. Sure it’s not the guns fault I get that. But it’s still tragic.
@@rolandthethompsongunner64 So It's personal problem maybe he wanted to not encouraging it but can't takes away guns from people that want to fight back like me
Did anyone else catch that lady's point that since her husband committed suicide with a gun, that we shouldn't have our constitution right to bear arms? Lol.... this entire story is full of $hit
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 You know this how? CNN told you? You do realize it didn't change the number of guns, and that it was already legal to have them in your car without a license? So your saying while walking the access goes up? So it's not straw purchases anymore it's while walking around we are just oblivious and the criminals gain better access! You didn't do well in school did you? I bet you got trophies anyway though!
I'm moving to Texas here in a little over a year! And can't wait to meet people in Texas that for the most part Love gun's! And I agree, more guns the better!!
The law is designed to protect your family and neighbors and if 80% didn’t like it then why did so many pro gun people outweigh those that didn’t want it
@Chris Smith You arm the "Populace with "FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS"? where are you located, I think the FED's would like to have a few words, and maybe give you some shiny bracelets.
@Chris Smith how you advertise makes a HUGE difference, as well as WHEN you advertise. Now is exactly the time to advertise that service. Bet it'll be a very different result unless you are in a liberal leaning city. A while back i went through the course for my ccl, finished it, but there was something I had to do online on a federal site that was either down or glitching for weeks. I just gave up on the hassle and kept my firearm at home 😕 with this bill passed now though I would actually love to refresh on the classroom portion
I just go by TREAT, NEVER, KEEP, KEEP and know your target and what lies behind it. And only use it when in IMMINENT danger of death or serious bodily harm to myself or others. But there's many intricacies about situations and circumstances where even possessing a firearm on you or even in your vehicle may get you in a buttload of trouble. I'll be doing some research again though to refresh for sure.
How does allowing people to own guns with absolutely no license or training going to protect my family? Just sounds like a horrible accident waiting to happen.
So you’re forcing a PRIVATE BUSINESS to not have their freedoms? You want to force business to be like China....how ironic. You can’t have selective hearing on the US Constitution.
@@stAirborneMk it's his right as a consumer. That's how capitalism works bud. And which of the rights in the bill of rights protects private businesses from people choosing to take business elsewhere? You know what is in the Constitution though? The right to keep and bear arms. The Founding Fathers wrote about how this applied everywhere in US borders.
"The new law does allow officers to ask someone about their guns "Only" if there's a reasonable suspicion a Crime has been Committed by that person!" This is clearly stated in the Law. *Training- Most all that shoot are trained at a very young age on how to handle guns safely. Law Abiding Citizens are Responsible. We've been able to carry shotguns, AR's, etc. for many many years without training & it's not the "Wild West" out there. I used to take my Guns to School in my truck in the late 80's. We'd go hunting after school & nothing "Bad" ever happened. We used to walk up & down 523 in Oyster Creek at age 16-17 headed to our favorite Duck Ponds without issues. Resposable Citizens will only draw their weapon to protect Life and or Property. Most people will never know if the person next to you is carrying or not. It's been like that for years because many Texans already have a CHL. This just cuts out the so Called "Trainers" (many classes are a joke) just a few hours & $$ to them & the Fed. Gov.
America already has “permitless carry”😂😂😂it’s called the 2nd amendment to the US constitution. Gun control and mandatory registration are federal crimes and those who disagree are legally braindead. “A law repugnant to the constitution is void” - Marbury v. Madison
Gun training doesn’t prevent gun suicides. Honestly I hope this works out and I’m a Democrat. I’m tired of violent crime and my parties refusal to deal with it properly. If someone threatens anyones life their life is forfeit period. But please get trained and lock your guns up. Theft is the number one way criminals get guns.
This lady here. Police don't get a say in how the law gets made or passed. Police can't stop you bc of the new law unless you are breaking the law and it's always been up too the owner to train the mind and memory of a safe handle and state laws.
I live in Texas and have relatives with CCWs. Having a gun without knowing how to use it safely is insane. It's like trying to drive down the interstate at 65 mph without ever having stepped in a car before. If you get a gun, please get training.
Moms demand action because they are incapable of action. That's the problem. They are incapable of defending themselves and require someone else to do it. They depend on the police. The police are not required to prevent crime from happening. You are responsible for your safety, no one else.
Law abiding ex-felons should be the ones to apply for gun license and gun training class before being allowed to open carry. It's a way so the gun classes don't go out of business and ppl still get trained . Just a thought.
In NY you don’t need training to own a firearm. Every state goes through a background check. So…….either A someone doesn’t know how this firearm business works or someone is lying for a “good” twisted story.
judging by how Pat holds a gun and has that finger discipline goes to show that he is no stranger to firearms. He is a man who has spent some triggertime frequently.
I wouldnt call the "training" i got for my carry license real training. Come on, one day??? Thats not training. My training came with being raised around and stooting guns from 8 yrs old, spending 12 yrs in the military and being retired now and STILL shooting pistols, rifles and shotguns. Traning is shooting on a regular basis and knowing when and where to do ot.
Bro I know people that carry illegally and if they take the The ones that are legal how are we going to protect ourselves from the people who carry illegally
So,the new law passes the responsibility of knowing your laws and training onto the everyman. I would rather experts teach me about the law and the weapon I will buy.
@@danh4543 What I mean is,I would rather have people whose job it is to educate and train new shooters over stumbling over it themselves. As in by law.
@@Metalman200xdamnit You know who the vast majority of firearms instructors are? Police. The same "trained" people that will shoot your dog and throw grenades at your children.
Cool but point to where in the Constitution it says "shall not be infringed unless you take a government approved training course". I'll wait. Meanwhile, training classes are time and financial gatekeeping against the disenfranchised and less affluent who just want to defend themselves and their families. Guess what...a majority of those people are minorities.
You just copy and paste this in the comments section. Just shows your ignorance on the subject. The US: >Has 2.5 million defensive gun uses every year >Has less than 14,000 criminal gun homicides a year (effecting 0.0042% of the population) >Isn't even in the top 50 for criminal homicides >Is below Greenland in criminal homicides
@@DreadnoughtHvor as a Developed and Civilized country, together with the U K , Germany, South Korea, Japan and even Singapore, your country is the worst in Gun Violence cases. while those countries has 0.01 to 0.04 Gun Violence related Deaths rate, your country has 3.96 Death Rate per 100.000 people.
@Junaidi Salam The UK, Germany, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore are all incomparable because of demographics and populations. But let's pretend for a bit they aren't. The US gun death number is grossly exaggerated. We are one of the few countries that includes self defense shootings, justified police shootings, and suicides in that number. Suicides make up a majority of that number. Around 60-70%. And suicides aren't a gun issue. If it was a gun issue, Japan wouldn't be a suicide capital of the world, now would it? The rest of the number breaks down into homicides (both justified and criminal) and accidents. Accidents is so small it's an irrelevant number. Gun homicides are around ~14,000 a year. This number isn't just murders. It's composed of justified police related shootings and justified self defense shootings. So gun murders are actually less than 14,000, or 0.0042%. This is an insignificant number. If gun violence was really an issue in the US, that number would be a lot higher than that with over 400 million guns in civilian hands. The other countries also have a host of other crime problems. I mean, the UK is banning knives because criminals find a way, and all those other countries have bad organized crime issues still. they've also had significant issues of government tyranny and oppression and still do. And you're still ignoring the CDC's number of lives saved by defensive gun uses each year: 2.5 million.
@@DreadnoughtHvor i'm trying not to include China and India to those statistic, because certainly you would use the Draconian, Oppression or Tyranny to argue. the point is Gun control, the more Gun circulated, the more Gun related deaths and violence. thats the fact, at least for countries with almost zero Gun Homicide case.
@@junaidisalam5718 that's not true though. If it was, the US would have greater than 0.0042% deaths to criminal gun homicides, not less, since the US has over 400 million guns in civilian hands. Meanwhile, that would mean that places with 100% gun bans would have a 0% gun murder rate. That's simply not true. And yes, China is absolutely tyrannical. Gun control does not decrease crime. It doesn't even decrease murder rates. It increases them.
It's called CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY, I wonder why this is so upsetting for some people when criminals have been carrying without a license since guns were invented.
Yes
Where in the Constitution does it say you don't need a license or training?
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 Where does it say you do?!?! Ask better questions.
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 Shall not be infringed! Where does it say you don't need a license to make your comment? Free speech is great too isn't it! You have the right to blow hot air without thinking all day long! Great isn't it!
@@fabfrenchies1974 AMEN i love ur comment
There are soldiers dieing for ur rights best to abuse it NO soldier goes to waste
NO SARCASM PROMISE
80 percent? I would love to see a citation of her statistics.
She’s lying like they all do
She get her data from CNN, news you can bust 😂
They took a poll outside one of their own anti-gun rallies.
@@calebwhite1999 they actually took a poll from their own anti-gun organization from 7,000 of there members then claim it was the whole of Texas, the community that vote in favor literally laughed at them for making the claims yet these 80%er still try passing off as truth
Yeah, i don't recall being in that poll.
"Don't bring guns in here!"
Thank God criminals read and follow rules!
🤣
"Doesn't mean you know how to properly use it"
*Instantly gets a bullseye*
True fellow Texan right there haha
Probably no worse than most LEO's
Not hard to get a bullseye at 5 feet with a Glock. I think you missed the part where he racked an already locked slide instead of using the slide release. I seriously doubt that dude knows anything about owning a handgun.
@@InfamousInternetVillainJackSix slingshotting is a perfectly legit technique when loading/reloading.
@@InfamousInternetVillainJackSix I was cringing at that line and then watching him tea cup his grip
@@brandonmms Just because someone isn’t a masterclass NRA LEO SWAT SEAL Team master ninja descendent of Jerry Miculek doesn’t mean they don’t know their way around a handgun.
Plenty of relatively untrained and inexperienced shooters can safely handle a pistol for their own defense.
She's upset because her husband's uncle shot himself? Could've jumped off a building; so let's just build bunkers. Could've taken a bunch if pills; so let's ban medicine. Could've jumped in front of traffic; so let's ban cars. People are so dumb, it's like a seat belt I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it. It's just a life saving TOOL.
Cause going after guns gives her something to do,,,,,,,,,,,and more importantly (for her) allows her to blame the su!c!de on something other than the root cause.
I don’t agree with her but I suggest you look at the rate of gun suicides in the US. It’s half of all gun deaths. Sure there are other ways but guns are way more accessible and you usually don’t botch the job. I know of several teenagers that took their lives with a gun. Sure it’s not the guns fault I get that. But it’s still tragic.
Shes obviously from California. We need to get those snowflicks out of Texas and send them back to Cali.
knives can be harmful too; let's ban knives.
@@rolandthethompsongunner64
So
It's personal problem maybe he wanted to not encouraging it but can't takes away guns from people that want to fight back like me
Did anyone else catch that lady's point that since her husband committed suicide with a gun, that we shouldn't have our constitution right to bear arms? Lol.... this entire story is full of $hit
Exactly what I was thinking. I can care less what they committed suicide with
I’m trying to figure out how suicide fits into fun violence
It was her husband’s uncle… she was REALLY stretching it lol
Gotta ban plastic bags, gas stoves and zipties too. LOL. Dumb stuff
What sad excuse of a woman. Want to end gun violence, uncle shot himself? That's a pretty stupid summation.
Bro there people dieing from drunk driving and yet beer gets sold everywhere
They don't even have to be drunk. I see sober drivers trying to kill me every day lmaoooooo
Gotta ban the life because it kills others xD
DON'T drink and drive......your beer will go flat.
what the hell does constitutional carry have to do with suicide?
MOMS DEMAND AUTOMATICS !
Epic
Moms Demand Double Action revolvers too!
My Wife’s Uncle’s third cousin said something I didn’t like one time, I’m starting a group to get rid of the 1st amendment!
😆
I’ve been carrying for years and I’m glad to see constitutional carry. The more guns the better to fight criminals
Also better access for criminals
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 You know this how? CNN told you? You do realize it didn't change the number of guns, and that it was already legal to have them in your car without a license? So your saying while walking the access goes up? So it's not straw purchases anymore it's while walking around we are just oblivious and the criminals gain better access! You didn't do well in school did you? I bet you got trophies anyway though!
I'm moving to Texas here in a little over a year! And can't wait to meet people in Texas that for the most part Love gun's! And I agree, more guns the better!!
The law is designed to protect your family and neighbors and if 80% didn’t like it then why did so many pro gun people outweigh those that didn’t want it
@Chris Smith You arm the "Populace with "FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS"? where are you located, I think the FED's would like to have a few words, and maybe give you some shiny bracelets.
@Chris Smith how you advertise makes a HUGE difference, as well as WHEN you advertise. Now is exactly the time to advertise that service. Bet it'll be a very different result unless you are in a liberal leaning city. A while back i went through the course for my ccl, finished it, but there was something I had to do online on a federal site that was either down or glitching for weeks. I just gave up on the hassle and kept my firearm at home 😕 with this bill passed now though I would actually love to refresh on the classroom portion
I just go by TREAT, NEVER, KEEP, KEEP and know your target and what lies behind it. And only use it when in IMMINENT danger of death or serious bodily harm to myself or others. But there's many intricacies about situations and circumstances where even possessing a firearm on you or even in your vehicle may get you in a buttload of trouble. I'll be doing some research again though to refresh for sure.
How does allowing people to own guns with absolutely no license or training going to protect my family? Just sounds like a horrible accident waiting to happen.
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 Because carrying is a constitutional right.
I will be boycotting business who is not in favor of this law.
So you’re forcing a PRIVATE BUSINESS to not have their freedoms? You want to force business to be like China....how ironic. You can’t have selective hearing on the US Constitution.
@@stAirborneMk I do hope that's sarcasm.
@@stAirborneMk it's his right as a consumer. That's how capitalism works bud.
And which of the rights in the bill of rights protects private businesses from people choosing to take business elsewhere?
You know what is in the Constitution though? The right to keep and bear arms. The Founding Fathers wrote about how this applied everywhere in US borders.
"The new law does allow officers to ask someone about their guns "Only" if there's a reasonable suspicion a Crime has been Committed by that person!"
This is clearly stated in the Law.
*Training- Most all that shoot are trained at a very young age on how to handle guns safely.
Law Abiding Citizens are Responsible. We've been able to carry shotguns, AR's, etc. for many many years without training & it's not the "Wild West" out there. I used to take my Guns to School in my truck in the late 80's. We'd go hunting after school & nothing "Bad" ever happened. We used to walk up & down 523 in Oyster Creek at age 16-17 headed to our favorite Duck Ponds without issues.
Resposable Citizens will only draw their weapon to protect Life and or Property.
Most people will never know if the person next to you is carrying or not. It's been like that for years because many Texans already have a CHL.
This just cuts out the so Called "Trainers" (many classes are a joke) just a few hours & $$ to them & the Fed. Gov.
Maybe gun classes and license to carry should be for law abiding ex-felons, this way most of those places stay in business and somewhat trained.
Stay smart and stay strapped..God bless us Texan's
Ahhhhh I'm gonna be a Texan soon!!!!!! I can't wait!!!!!
Lol gratuitously childish culture
@@vulturesiii6450 not to sure what gratuitously means but thanks or why would you said that! Loll! Depending on what that means!
America already has “permitless carry”😂😂😂it’s called the 2nd amendment to the US constitution.
Gun control and mandatory registration are federal crimes and those who disagree are legally braindead.
“A law repugnant to the constitution is void” - Marbury v. Madison
Gun training doesn’t prevent gun suicides. Honestly I hope this works out and I’m a Democrat. I’m tired of violent crime and my parties refusal to deal with it properly. If someone threatens anyones life their life is forfeit period. But please get trained and lock your guns up. Theft is the number one way criminals get guns.
I HEARD THAT AND WAS LIKE WHAT.
Gun violence is not hunting, so how would gun violence apply to suicide??
If I appendix carry a loaded gun pointed at my sack, I think the general population can trust my handling skills.
Imagine that, its your responsibility to know how, when and where to use your firearm.
It's not there aren't consequences for using firearms irresponsibly and ignoring the effort to seek training
Yessir stay cool, let's enjoy freedom while we can, stay safe y'all God bless America.
This lady here. Police don't get a say in how the law gets made or passed. Police can't stop you bc of the new law unless you are breaking the law and it's always been up too the owner to train the mind and memory of a safe handle and state laws.
The constitution never mentioned license and training.
So needing to know gun laws and basic gun safety are bad ideas?
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 Not at all but most self defense situations involving guns show most people had no training.
Don’t forget responsible gun owners always act responsibly but none of you talk about the criminals who follow no law
Having to get a license for a right is extortion. Constitutional carry for the win🤟🏼🤟🏼🤟🏼
Where in the Constitution does it say you don't need a license or training?
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 Where in the Constitution does it say i need them?
@@ifeedonsuffering1649 it says nothing shall restrict
I live in Texas and have relatives with CCWs. Having a gun without knowing how to use it safely is insane. It's like trying to drive down the interstate at 65 mph without ever having stepped in a car before. If you get a gun, please get training.
Just go to the range & practice gun safety
Lol new places you can't carry firearms so the same places you couldn't before.
If you dont like it, moove. I didnt like california laws so I mooved.
You said suicide wrong ... Idk what's firearm suicide, like did a gun shoot itself? Always trying to politicize something.
It's about time
It's about time letting people with no knowledge about gun laws or basic gun safety onto the street.
Moms demand action because they are incapable of action. That's the problem. They are incapable of defending themselves and require someone else to do it. They depend on the police. The police are not required to prevent crime from happening. You are responsible for your safety, no one else.
Law abiding ex-felons should be the ones to apply for gun license and gun training class before being allowed to open carry. It's a way so the gun classes don't go out of business and ppl still get trained . Just a thought.
This is smart asf! Non-violent offenders should have options too, in my opinion.
You are NEVER SAFER by being unarmed when an attacker comes looking for trouble.
Yes
Hooray for Texas legislature!!
Shall Not Be Infringed pickle breath.
We should regulate speech for media, that way if it ain't true we don't have to deal with there carnage!
What a crock of 💩 Everyone deserves the right to defend themselves.
In NY you don’t need training to own a firearm. Every state goes through a background check. So…….either A someone doesn’t know how this firearm business works or someone is lying for a “good” twisted story.
FTP
No such thing as unlicensed gun owner now.
dont go to those places where you can't carry a gun
I have a gun still don't feel safe when you have a gun. Underlined.
You know else promotes gun safety and storage? Legal gun owners. smh
"There's some concerns "
Que the Karens
judging by how Pat holds a gun and has that finger discipline goes to show that he is no stranger to firearms. He is a man who has spent some triggertime frequently.
So you think a 8 hour class will help them
That's actually not true. That's violates your rights.
TX gun laws keep getting better. CA gun laws keep getting worse.
Just carry concealed...
I wouldnt call the "training" i got for my carry license real training. Come on, one day??? Thats not training. My training came with being raised around and stooting guns from 8 yrs old, spending 12 yrs in the military and being retired now and STILL shooting pistols, rifles and shotguns. Traning is shooting on a regular basis and knowing when and where to do ot.
And now WHAT HAPPENED???????
I’m here because of recent school shooting.
What are other constitutional rights that require licensing and training? Background checks before you can speak or practice religion??
Yall be smart...this is exactly how they will get guns off the street...same bird people...no matter which wing.
Wow, this was extremely biased. This male reporter did a great job with fear mongering.
Wow so genius.
im a britsh citizen we have no right to self defsese or protection a licience only means the goverment knows were to go to take it off you
I'm not an expert or anything but I bet if New York City Chicago and Detroit had constitutional carry there'd be a lot less shootings.
Bro I know people that carry illegally and if they take the The ones that are legal how are we going to protect ourselves from the people who carry illegally
see when the next school gets hit up
1 of 666 new laws effective Sept. 1st. Also, no background checks are required.
And they should make it 100 percent passing not 80 .or 75 or whatever ever that is under 100%
Just to let all you sheep know u don't need a license to preserve your rights
im moving to texas right now
Great
just cowboy things
Will Disasters happen?
to make you feel safer LOL
If the left in America should leave and swap with me I wanna go to america
So,the new law passes the responsibility of knowing your laws and training onto the everyman. I would rather experts teach me about the law and the weapon I will buy.
Nothing in the law forbids you from being taught about the law or the weapon you will buy. Nothing.
@@danh4543 What I mean is,I would rather have people whose job it is to educate and train new shooters over stumbling over it themselves.
As in by law.
@@Metalman200xdamnit You know who the vast majority of firearms instructors are? Police. The same "trained" people that will shoot your dog and throw grenades at your children.
Cool but point to where in the Constitution it says "shall not be infringed unless you take a government approved training course". I'll wait.
Meanwhile, training classes are time and financial gatekeeping against the disenfranchised and less affluent who just want to defend themselves and their families. Guess what...a majority of those people are minorities.
@@DreadnoughtHvor Would you rather have someone that can safely and accurately use a gun or someone that cannot use it properly?
When the government can't make you feel like you live in a safe country You do it yourself.
Wild Wild West 2.0
wonder would Covid19 took more life or Gun in a merica.
You just copy and paste this in the comments section.
Just shows your ignorance on the subject.
The US:
>Has 2.5 million defensive gun uses every year
>Has less than 14,000 criminal gun homicides a year (effecting 0.0042% of the population)
>Isn't even in the top 50 for criminal homicides
>Is below Greenland in criminal homicides
@@DreadnoughtHvor as a Developed and Civilized country, together with the U K , Germany, South Korea, Japan and even Singapore, your country is the worst in Gun Violence cases.
while those countries has 0.01 to 0.04 Gun Violence related Deaths rate, your country has 3.96 Death Rate per 100.000 people.
@Junaidi Salam The UK, Germany, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore are all incomparable because of demographics and populations.
But let's pretend for a bit they aren't.
The US gun death number is grossly exaggerated. We are one of the few countries that includes self defense shootings, justified police shootings, and suicides in that number.
Suicides make up a majority of that number. Around 60-70%. And suicides aren't a gun issue. If it was a gun issue, Japan wouldn't be a suicide capital of the world, now would it?
The rest of the number breaks down into homicides (both justified and criminal) and accidents.
Accidents is so small it's an irrelevant number.
Gun homicides are around ~14,000 a year. This number isn't just murders. It's composed of justified police related shootings and justified self defense shootings.
So gun murders are actually less than 14,000, or 0.0042%.
This is an insignificant number. If gun violence was really an issue in the US, that number would be a lot higher than that with over 400 million guns in civilian hands.
The other countries also have a host of other crime problems. I mean, the UK is banning knives because criminals find a way, and all those other countries have bad organized crime issues still. they've also had significant issues of government tyranny and oppression and still do.
And you're still ignoring the CDC's number of lives saved by defensive gun uses each year: 2.5 million.
@@DreadnoughtHvor i'm trying not to include China and India to those statistic, because certainly you would use the Draconian, Oppression or Tyranny to argue.
the point is Gun control, the more Gun circulated, the more Gun related deaths and violence.
thats the fact, at least for countries with almost zero Gun Homicide case.
@@junaidisalam5718 that's not true though. If it was, the US would have greater than 0.0042% deaths to criminal gun homicides, not less, since the US has over 400 million guns in civilian hands. Meanwhile, that would mean that places with 100% gun bans would have a 0% gun murder rate. That's simply not true.
And yes, China is absolutely tyrannical.
Gun control does not decrease crime. It doesn't even decrease murder rates. It increases them.