Opening Statement: Matheau Moore’s Defense Says State’s Murder Theory Makes No Sense
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 авг 2022
- During her opening statement, defense attorney Diane Menashe asserted that the state’s theory of a staged suicide and murder is based on speculation and inferences. “Their theory doesn’t make sense,” Menashe said in opening statements. "There is no evidence connecting Matt Moore to the scene."
#StagedSuicideMurderTrial #EmilyNoble #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
I am here after the fact, but she is an incredible Attorney. Wow. Just an amazing job of defending an innocent man.
Actually she seems as great as Elaine, AH lawyer.
Pretty basic, nothing special or standout about her at all. Pretty below average average actually.
The searches were Allowed by Matt.
Cause he thought he did a great job of getting rid of all the incriminating evidence.
@@jaggirl You should have given the prosecutors the evidence you had about this case ! Why didn't you say that you know about where the evidence was long ago ! 🤣
@@jaggirl Elaine is one of the worst lawyers I’ve ever seen. She should retire asap.
She’s awesome especially at closing
I can't believe how many people that were close to her have killed themselves ..
Very sad indeed
I work with someone whe have had several people they know kill themselves. It’s tragic
Which makes me believe that she killed herself as well. That kinda thing can actually be "contagious", as sad as it is l.
I tell you what. I would never want to be married and have my spouse die at home in any way shape or form.
I was thinking the same thing...
yea, I think it's a little easier when you don't kill em though lol.
@@picnicsinspace198 Lol!
@@forpeace1580 I mean...heh, it's the truth right?
If you didn’t kill anyone, there’d be no problem.
This attorney layed it down in just an opening statement! That's what u call doing your homework and representing an innocent man!!!!
Defense attorney is amazing and already has cast a lot of doubt on the state's case in just her opening statement alone.
She is a ROCK STAR!!! I ♥️ her!
So sad may she rest in peace 🕊️🕊️
It's awful for her and now him 😢
Yes it's definitely a sad case and it's sad what all Emily had endured in her life. RIP Emily.
@@lindaf4369 I missed something. What did she endure??
Great attorney! Great opening statement
Just listening to this opening.. this guy is so clearly innocent. That poor lady went through so much.. so many suicides around her. Wow. And they want to put this poor guy through this..
I agree. If one of my children, pass before me, I probably will have a heart attack….that night. If I don’t, I would want to.
This is EXACTLY the kind of Attorney rhat SHOULD BE the Norm for all [innocent] Criminal Defenses!
This lady's very good at her craft!
He was smart in hiring her....
Because "the burden of proof is on the Prosections side" -
This oftentimes leads many a Criminal Defense Att'y failing to fight as much as they should in not only impounding, but solidifying the basic evidences of Factual Truth.
Kudos to her! Well done!
GOD BLESS
🌿💕🌿
I am reading these responses and really annoyed. People saying she is “shrill” she could “catch more flies with honey” would anyone say that about a male lawyer? She seems excellent to me. And very convincing
Stop making it about gender. She is hated because she's on the "bad guy" side.
Camille Vasquez was a national hero couple weeks ago...
Yes, annoying male lawyers get attacked all the time in youtube comments.
Stop playing the victim, you western women are always looking to start arguments because your lives are too easy and comfortable.
She is a master manipulator, and, to some, that makes a good lawyer. However, most would agree that a fast talking, condescending woman or man, is not a skilled attorney.
And a rock star who won
@@Phanohm You: Stop making it about gender.
Also you: this girl is on the bad guy side because she defends someone who was found not guilty and their is an overwhelming complete lack of evidence to convict the man.
Menashe is an amazing attorney. Just shows you the difference between an innocent or guilty defendant she’s having to defend
Pp
Pp
Ppp
Pp
P
How did this get to trial? Seems like everything is circumstantial.
Shes great. Honestly its looking fairly good for him as far as reasonable doubt goes
Excellent opening statement. Surgical.
Also, LOL, objection to an opening statement... prosecution already lost and they know it.
It's not because you object that you've lost, the evidence and testimonies are what matters.
Well,let's see what happens when the evidence is out
Said the high school student aiming to be a lawyer
@@ihateutube1143 Turns out State only had conjecture, not evidence. I am leaning towards guilty but jury disagreed and the State was unprofessional, ill-prepared and sleep-inducing. Counting on emotion to convict is not a strategy 🙄
Where was this lady during my divorce?
@Stephen Green for real but keep her in mind for criminal defense 🤣
Practicing criminal defense and not batting an eye at family law.😂😉
I dnt think he's guilty. I truly think she lost the battle to stay sane and keep recealance. Too mny traumas to overcome. She couldn't live with the total feeling of doom and gloom everyday. The mind finally snapped.
I don’t know anything about this case, but she is far more dynamic and charismatic than the prosecution. However, he might be the world's best at cross examination even if he is poor at opening statements.
Diane Menashe got William Husel acquitted, I loved watching her during that trial. I liked her better than Jose Baez, who got Casey Anthony acquitted. He represented Dr. Husel. But she is great at cross as well. She's very prepared. The Husel case was very medical oriented and she had that information down, pretty amazing for a non-medical person.
Spoiler: he's not
@@RozeechildRN you sure like to watch trials where there is no justice huh lol
@@chocolatecoveredgummybears Justice is not just getting a conviction, it's convicting the guilty party! There was justice here... for the defendant
@@_HimToo amen
Wow!! Defense is doing an incredible job!!! Very convincing.
She's a Beast
Uhm.. I started this thinking the hubby was guilty. I'm leaving thinking the hubby just may be innocent. Great great great opening for the defense.
The defense attorney is a powerhouse!!!!
Those unwilling to control their emotions and actions that follow will be subject to incredible injustice.
Or they will commit incredible injustices?
Thank you for bringing this case to RUclips😀😀😀
Great opening statement from the defense
If that ain’t reasonable doubt, I don’t know what is.
Everyone has the right to a trial. You get what you pay for.
yes agree
best justice money can buy
my biggest fear is like in the movie ( My Cousin Vinny ) when the one defense attorney sounds great and confident then day of opening statement he chokes and stutters his way through it and says nothing to help. Lol.
@@toast2610 I agree that happens at times , just my opinion ,I m trying to learn myself to not judge so easily but sometimes things are just what they are .
Can someone pls tell me how they had enough cause to charge him to begin with?
Diane Menashe is a phenomenal Attorney. Most recently in a highly publicized Case, she was Co-Counsel for Dr. William Husel of Columbus, Ohio.
I wonder if Matt Moore realizes how blessed he is to have Attorney Diane Menashe defending him?!
In any case, I believe in JUSTICE, and I pray that the truth in this case will be revealed to the Jury. May they reach a JUST VERDICT for all involved.
She wouldn’t defend if he was close to guilty.
I found her obnoxious during the Huesel trial too. Her voice is shrill and her attitude entitled.
Amen! I pray to God that the TRUTH comes out & justice is served!
@@bonnienelson7373 🙏
I thought it was Jose Baez?
I know this is over but what was wrong with the prosecution? I can’t imagine them bringing charges given her history. This is just so wrong.
She is a very good lawyer. Understands so well how to verbalize the law while continuously pointing out the flaws and directly refuting the states claims
She just spanked that prosecutor's opening.
Diane Menashe is a fabulous lawyer and totally professional.
Adore this Lady
Yeah, she makes criminals go free
@@mistiblu246
Dont "adore" anyone but GOD 💕
@@mjk6618 please.. don’t!
@@mistiblu246
WHY would anyone say that?!
"Please dont?!! Whoa'!
I detect far Left Libturd or a troll
You can 'adore' your false idols and I'll keep adoring mine;
"GOD ALMIGHTY"
(and 🙏 for ppl like you)
This is the same attorney that got that doctor off with Jose Baez
He killed her in the woods, no evidence found in cars or house
No evidence found anywhere, actually. You'd be part of a lynch mob 100 years ago, zero doubt. Bloodthirsty.
Great opening by the defense, definitely made more sense than the state in my opinion.
When I saw the arrest video I figured this guy was guilty, but after opening statements I'm pretty sure that's he's not guilty (beyond a reasonable doubt at least). I hope he takes the stand.
Just watched the prosecution opening and it was as weak as it gets.
Like how this guy is up for murder based on that opening is bizarre.
Maybe there's going to be some real evidence presented other than a prosecution medical 'expert' paid to back up their claims.
This lawyer is awesome. Facts
Great job lady!!
Do sherif' now a days have no physical requirements? Like run a mile in 18ish minutes, 20 pushups, sit-ups, ect... Just asking.
Lmao 😂 i know right ..
🤣🤣🤣
But,but.but, he switched to mini donuts… 🤦🏻♂️
LOL yes they do 🤣
apparently not
prosecutors always use emotion in their cases, i hope the jury stick to the evidence.
I agree. Im surprised more people don't choose a bench trial! A judge tends to follow the law not emotions.
1:48 the State didn’t mention reasonable doubt? Why would they lol? Why would the State even want those words in the jurors minds?
Because they're supposed to be justice seekers, not conviction seekers. Prosecutors routinely mention reasonable doubt in their opening. Watch more court if you don't believe me.
Because prosecutors role is to achieve justice not unwarranted punishment
Usually being THAT cooperative, leading Police to the corpse etc, are a strong sign for guilt.
Wouldn´t be the first time that a guilty person tries to appear overly unsuspicious and achieves the opposite.
But we´ll see...
He didn't lead her to the corpse, he just told her where she might be and she did end up being there. The search team told him they looked where she was found, even though they didn't search there. That led most of the people looking for her to overlook the place she was actually in. It was a real screwup. He was incredibly cooperative though. Willing to let them have full access to his home, phones, and vehicles as well as take pictures of his body or anything else they wanted. He didn't become defensive until they started to accuse him of crimes.
The defense lawyer is very unpleasant to listen to. I wonder if the jury minds being barked at.
I think she's shouting because she's away from the microphone.
@@geoffpoole483 Uh, no. Have seen her before. Shouting. Shrill. Demeaning. Her trifecta. 🤮
Drop the mic
It's hanged not hung when it's a person
It's interchangeable in UK English grammar however.
She reminds me a lot of the defense attorney Lyann Goudie , who represented Michael Keetley and got a hung jury for him...she gave so much doubt just in opening statements just like this attorney did. In fact, Lyann's opening statement was so strong that Michael told her not to do a closing statement, he thought her opening was good enough lol.
this is a good example of how dangerous it is to be a married man in the United States.
Defence is good, I got in to the case half way...had to go back see both sides, so open ...but what a sad case of these people...
Usually defense attorneys are cringeworthy but this one she's good I like her tone her speech is spot on. She's very easy to listen to.
I watched both opening statements and this woman presented her case 10 times better than the prosecution. She is amazing. I will keep an open mind but I hope this man did not do it and that his wife took her soul to a beautiful place on her own vallition
Election time is coming up, they wanted to prosecute this case. A win would be very valuable for those who could use it.
Opening statements are not evidence and I urge you to watch the full case and consider the evidence - maybe inconsequential ultimately but perhaps good practice for a case where you’re a juror in the future.
@@brady3126 that is good advice. I am aware that opening statements are not evidence. I just felt that the defense seems to present a much better case than the prosecution. I only said I hope that he did not do it for all the families sake. I do need to watch much more of the case. If he is guilty he deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison
She completely annihilated the state! It’s funny every time she’s up and talking you to see the state with the look on their face like we are in over our heads with her!!
Why would she walk all that way to kill herself, when she had everything at home to do the job??????
Also I'm not saying he is innocent or guilty just saying it isn't and a unheard of phenomena
Because she was obsessed with nature and the outdoors. She insisted they make love, outdoors. Her stepson killed himself, outdoors. You'd know this if you watched any of the trial and didn't make assumptions.
Can someone tell me the reason or logic behind repeatedly saying "members of the jury" over and over...and over. Is it simply to keep their attention, or is there more psychology behind it that a leyman wouldn't think about? Obviously, she does it for a purpose...and she's one of the best there is, so she knows what she's doing... Just interested in the psychological purpose it serves, assuming it's for that reason.
Gets their attention
It's a way to break up her speech and emphasize she's now making a new point, just like someone would say first, second, third, or a, b, c. It's also to keep their attention for each new, unique argument.
Yes. He took them to the area where he put her......'where he took her'
I’m surprised this ever made it inside a courthouse wtf??? Am I missing something??? I’m pretty much pro prosecution but this is a bad case!
The state doesn't really care if they have a good case or care about the harms done to someone forced to go through a trial while innocent. Their take is that if the person is innocent or guilty the jury will figure that out and there job is just to make the best case they can against the most likely suspect. They often times charge and try multiple people for a single crime in an attempt to find a resolution to the case.
Was "where did he take her" a Freudian slip there? She's did well with the evidence part but he wouldn't be the first killer to lead the police to a victim nor move one.
Agree, now you're thinking correctly!
That was interesting, I caught that too!
Please, for u future defense attorneys. Do not use Reasonable Doubt in ur opening statement.
Also don't take advice from someone who can't spell "your"
I wonder why the procecution takes the case if there is no clear evidence? I would not like to take such case...
I'm gonna tell the world right now that if my wife ever goes missing I WILL NOT COOPERATE WITH POLICE FOR ONE SECOND and I WILL NOT BE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY ON THEIR TERMS if I can help it.
i am so glad Matt was found innocent, poor guy suffered enough & had to sit through all this after losing Emily.. what the judge said after the verdict was so poignant ... ''we all want justice for Emily, but that does not mean injustice for you''... hope you can begin healing now Matt 💔much love ❤
She's an awesome speaker and a great attorney.
Screecher, Stephanie lazarus lookalike
Very good Opening Statement
they put a gps on him? wtf
Brilliant defense attorney. God forbid I ever get charged for any crime, but if I am I would want her to defend me.
Hmm he wouldn’t be the first one calling 911. Give me a dollar for every call made by a killer . So that’s is not a reason for me to believe it yet ,but it’s just begon.
What is this defense attorneys name? I love her! I’m hooked
It took me 10 minutes to get over her yelling at the beginning.
She slipped up a lot when cross examining the first witness; lost her way a bit.
Interesting to see where it goes.
This is the defence lawyer who allowed the killer doctor William Husel (14 deaths) to run free. And I don’t understand why she was so hostile to the victim’s sister as if she was the murder suspect. She’s got the worst crossing style by asking “Did you not”, Do you not” with every single question. And her grating voice doesn’t help. This is going to be a hard trial to watch with this awful woman in it.
To be fair, she is effective at her job of being a defence attorney. Whether you like her style or not.
@@jessice293 Menasha may be effective but her manner is so grating. I too had to labor through weeks of listening 👂 to her during the William Husel trial. The only thing that has changed is her haircut 🙄.
She is the Queen of Objecting.
Certainly working on throwing the prosecutor’s train of thought. 😫
Yes, Francesca, the very same Menasha as the Husel trial. 🤮
I actually thought the outcome in the Husel trial was correct. There are many medical professionals who will same the same. However, I saw some that say the same as you.
I thought family was hostile with her as well. She did a very competent job in that case, better than Jose Baez, who freed Casey Anthony (which I think she should been found guilty) but beyond reasonable doubt is a high burden to prove, as it should be. Many innocent people sit in prisons.
@@maryfitzpatrick3252 her job is to object though?
Well I'm convinced. Good job defense.
12:55 "Where did he take her?" LOL What aFreudian slip
Well spotted!
Makes one wonder....
Oh wow…. “Where did he take her?” was not a great mistake to make
My thoughts too, Freudian slip
@@staceyb.5878 do you have timeline plz thx
@@halimak625 13:00
@@candymcgrant2425 aww thx
Do Lawyers today have to violate their Oaths to defend a client ? I did not get that memo.
Lawyers aren't under oath in court, unlike witnesses.
despite great opening statement and me wanting to believe he had nothing to do with her death, I do have questions like why wouldn't she leave any notes or anything before she disappeared....Did they ever monitor any injuries on his body weeks and months after May 25,2020 in case he killed her some time after her disappearance?
So he killed her on her birthday? That's cold...
I have been watching this case and at first I was thinking he was guilty but now I think they are looking in the wrong place, I feel someone took her on the 25th when she went walking kept her for awhile and placed her body in sept at the place she was found. To me that can be the only explanation for her body not showing up until sept.
Go check out the cell phone records timeline on day 3
She is dynamic! I'll be watching.
Dynamic in the way she belittles prosecution witnesses 😇
Ear 👂 plugs are on sale at CVS.
@@maryfitzpatrick3252 that’s the point of cross
I just wanna know one thing… what brand usb cord did she use? I just walk NEAR my cords and they break…
LMAOO
Someone is not telling the Truth.
I'm over here wondering why she keeps saying "members of the jury" over & over instead of ladies & gentlemen or something. It sounds so weird & out of place. I just realized it's probably because everyone is so fukt up about gender that she's afraid to say something like 'ladies & gentlemen'. Society & culture is in such a screwy place right now. We're gonna be in big trouble if people don't grow up pretty soon here
Glad he got to change his shirt lol every video ( outside of court ) he been earring that best up blue one
Sadly, prosecutors will gladly send someone they know is innocent to prison without losing a second of sleep. When you hear a prosecutor bragging about their 100% conviction rate, you are listening to a truly evil human being. There are only two things that are 100%, death and taxes.
Both the prosecution and the defense attorneys are unbearable. I'm out...
The family of suicides? WTF - this changes everything - the fact that their son hung himself in the same fashion, and his brother...proves this was a family with alot of issues and seems less and less likely that this was a staged murder.
I've read reports of blunt force trauma as well as multiple stab wounds being evident. Do you suppose she did that as well?
@@deusexmachina2.082 haven't heard of that at all. But even if it's true, still doesn't mean he did it.
It's so hard to move a dead body, how could he kill her, transport her( no evidence in cars ). And then hang her body from a tree. Crazy, and not a mark on his body.
@@purples7455 Emily Noble was only 5’2” and 100 lbs.
@@baphtism Mr. Moore had put his hands around and choked his first wife when she was pregnant with their first Son. Also, why did he wake up at 1am and then go to sleep in another room. Odd. Then he proceeded to slept til after 10am. Very odd behaviors since his wife “disappears” and is found dead.
she is too aggressive
Guilty or not I think this lawyer will get him out.
dang she was doing good until @13:00. I know it was just a stumbling of words but that wasn't good. smh She said with her whole chest at that moment. To then goof and say "Where Matt took her...the officers ". smh
Ummm....big deal??? You try to do what she did without making a minor slip up - which she promptly corrected. So clearly obvious what she meant anyway. What's your day job involve I wonder....and do you ever say the wrong word 🤔
@@raci179 you may think it's was okay but that was the worst thing as a defense attorney to say at that moment. She is a great attorney and that was a major mis statement. When her client is being accused of killing his wife and placing her in that exact spot.
@@brighterdayjenn8579 nah....you're making something major out of nothing here. You try to deliver that much information in 30+ mins and see if you stumble on your words at all.
@@raci179 👍
@@brighterdayjenn8579 😘
Didn't know about this case until this morning when I bumped into a video of the state's opening statement.
I'm 11:56 into the defense's opening statement and she sounds more convincing regardless of whether this man is guilty or innocent.
Back to the video.
Agreed
Watch the Podcast about this case on The Vanished episode 315and 314.very interesting
@@denben8530 Thanks. I will.🌹
@@denben8530 Yes, The Vanished Podcast-Marissa Jones is one of the best true missing persons/crime podcasters out there. She’s tells it like it is without the spin.
I feel like the Prosecutor's tone and arguments were weak, the Defense opening statement was strong but the defendant makes me think he is guilty. Should be interesting.
What about him makes him look guilty?
Defense 1 Prosecution 0
he has not cried once
Nope, wrong. You clearly haven't watched the trial. He's visibly cried, with actual tears, multiple times in court. Keep spreading lies though.
anywheres?
evidence or lies
ok thnx
This lawyer is insufferable. The client reeks with passive aggressive and looks guilty.
"Looks guilty"
>opinion discarded
She is shrill. And what’s with the defendant’s constant furtive scribbling ✍️ on sticky notes AND a tablet?
how is someone supposed to look after their son killed himself, and then their spouse killed themselves.. and then got arrested for her murder?
after years and years of prosecutors hiding exculpatory evidence , labs making life or death mistakes , cops colluding with witnesses , cops lying , planting evidence , judges disallowing exculpatory evidence ... you would be angry too VERY VERY VERY
He looks totally innocent to me and fortunately jury requires evidence
Defense’s shrill voice escalating during opening. Like fingernails on a chalk board. 🥹😳😟🤕👎
When your defense lawyer quickly cuts to the chase of "well they have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt", things are not looking too good.
Why? That’s the states burden. Prosecutors case is weak so far. Not looking good for the state
It’s not her cutting to the chase, it’s her pointing out that they are unable to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, which is the exact thing that they must prove in order to prosecute
Apparently the jury disagreed. Innocent, because he wasn’t proven guilty.
@@SuzyLovesJesus And that proves what?
Guilty people do get away with their crimes sometimes.
The prosecution did not have sufficient evidence, that is all.
@@thenowchurch6419 it’s not that they didn’t have “sufficient” evidence.. they lacked ANY valid evidence. nothing tied him to the crime, his son took his own life the same way a year or so before.. he’s innocent. the legal system, jury judge, and absolutely no evidence of a crime.. he’s innocent
Those defense attorneys are so HOT
Why is she taking a walk everywhere?
Because she can - and if it helps her, she's an expressive person then that's what she should do
@madzangels I wholeheartedly agree!
@@madzangels I am not sure, in a technical point of view. Sometimes, as she distances herself from the mic, her voice lose a bit of clarity and you cannot see her in the frame. When she bended over, I was wondering what was she doing or demonstrating. There might be times when people fail to hear or see her. Also, it can be a bit distracting to some extense. She sure can move around, but with moderation and technical consideration.
If it helped Saul Goodman, it’ll help her.
@@angelsadventure4996 She is trying to keep the jury alert
Killer's this Wife!?
Statistics are a funny thing: if you driving down a dangerous road looking for the safest way to travel and come to an intersection with many forks in different directions and not knowing the safest way to travel but one of the roads clearly has more tire tracks than the rest then it would be reasonable to conclude that road is probably the safest. Just because statistically the spouse is usually responsible police should still start from a neutral position but they never do. Their first assumption is always the spouse. Police like to say they start from from the inside and expand out, this is misleading. They start with the husband is guilty and has to prove his innocence. Very rarely does the train get off that track. Judges are supposed to be impartial but they rarely are. You could hear the extreme disappointment in the judge's voice as he read the verdict.