@@shepdaggett destroying structure! some of the time we play some wrong move intentionally so that we can destroy opponent development structure it looks foolish at the moment but is better in long run and about these players they just think like 10-20 moves ahead because of that we can never understand what exactly happening, unless a GM himself explains the match!
I’m so confused
Explain this endgame to me?
where you didnt understand?
It seems like Hans gave up like halfway. So many open pieces not taken and so many empty blunders. Am I an idiot? Was this somehow strategic?
@@shepdaggett destroying structure! some of the time we play some wrong move intentionally so that we can destroy opponent development structure it looks foolish at the moment but is better in long run and about these players they just think like 10-20 moves ahead because of that we can never understand what exactly happening, unless a GM himself explains the match!
Thank you very much. Interesting