You have to be clearly assessing pakistani national security policy…. He mentioned no conflict but not mentioned on stopping cross border terrorism and militancy
@prasanth kandra Your India too is involved in terrorism inside Pakistan. Your country isolated our Eastern Wing in 1971 and yet calls Pakistan a terrorism hub? Don't you question your country's policy?
@@zahirshah22 and that explains how uneducated you and your countrymen are. The need of the hour in your country is a proper education. And a history lesson which tells you the truth and not a history lesson which is a propaganda.
@@zahirshah22 Dear Zahir zanab, Do you ever thought about genocide committed by Pakistan army on poor Bangladeshis, raping thousands of women etc etc….
@@Drkp23 Thanks bro..atleast you used polite words...for conversation..Mr. Amith Prabhu .. called me uneducated... Dear ... please listen to Mr. Yuri Bezmenov....the Ex Propaganda expert in KGB... please listen to him as to how USSR and India together created and supported Mukti Bahni...that will have thugs and murdurers as its members ...who would execute the East Pakistan civilians, rape women and then the whole bloody blame would be thrown upon Pakistan army... For the past 2 decades India used Afghan soil to send terrorists into Pakistan... you don't know all this ..but people in your intelligence know this.. Take care..
Has Russia ever accepted meddling in former Soviet states? Pakistan has maintained it does not support terrorism so why hinting it? This is not how things are run.
Before 1965 war, President of Pakistan Ayub khan had given a statement in their bilateral conversation with Americans- "we want to have a joint military with India to fight communists"...... When Atal Bihari Bajpayee was visiting Pakistan to build goodwill gesture, pakistani soldiers were occupying vacanted Indian Peaks in Kargil..... These security reports are just a way to avert temporary difficulties Pakistan is facing...
Actually he offered joint security against China when he felt that China is common threat. Our establishment (mainly Nehruji) declined offer on the ground that China is a friend and Pakistan is bound to come back to India.
@@IndiaTides Not exactly. It is true that Ayub Khan proposed a joint defense pact against China in 1959. It is also true that Nehru rejected it but the reason was Ayub Khan's insistence on a solution to Kashmir. Nehru made many blunders but more often than not, these were because circumstances forced Nehru into the corner. The biggest blunder that India ever made was the Simla agreement where for the first time we had a clear upper hand against Pak but Indira Gandhi did a Prithviraj Chauhan.
@@sankalp6872 I read up that the answer was why should we make the pact against such a good friend. The answer is quoted in one of the article based on the book. The other claim of Indira did Prithviraj was completely wrong. We made clear at that time that we are against genocide of Bangladeshi and we are attacking strictly base on our moral ground. The idea that we use that opportunity to benefit us would have undermined our moral standing and we would have lost our international support drastically. They lost the half of their country and demanding more would have been untenable besides would have kept that wound fester much more. Don't do revision of decision based on assumptions. See that in the context of that time.
@@IndiaTides America provided aid & military support to Pakistan with the condition that Pakistan would participate in fight against communism... But Pakistan's objective was to take America money & technology to prepare for war against India.... When America demanded Pakistani support in Korean War, Pakistan made excuses.... So offering India to form a joint military against China was basically another facade just to show Americans that they are sincere.... What they really wanted happened in 1965.
Hard to believe anything about mutual cooperation from the ones who stabbed us in the back by starting Kargil war just a few months from the inauguration of Kartarpur corridor.
Asked about his plans on Egyptian television in 1998, Arafat explained that strategic pause was a venerable Islamic strategy, referring specifically to the “Khudaibiya agreement” in which the Prophet Mohammed made a ten-year treaty with the Arabian tribe of Koreish, but broke it after two years - during which his forces used the security of the pact to marshal their strength - and then conquered the Koreish tribe. Pakistaniyat is based on "hindu-hatred" and jihad against hindus... This ideology is at the heart of every Pakistani - which is not going change in 100 years!
@@umerrashid4940 for your easy understanding- the bottom line is India should reject any so called peace talks with jihadis, backstabbers and country which never stayed true to its promises... hammering of pak economy should continue....you can't trust a country that has conned US and Afghans too. now cope. Chanakyaneeti rules.
Bhutto once boasted of fighting India for 1000 years even if they eat only grass. Now they want a drinks break of 100 years! What for? To cultivate enough grass? That India can supply them free of cost on humanitarian grounds!!
@@sra1354 Simple. They have to aid them. Pakistan have American military equipments from fighter jets to tanks to almost everything. And America needs to keep an eye on Pakistan's nuclear weapons. It is a constant threat and the danger is clear and present. The only reason they haven't been sanctioned like north korea is because they haven't tested their nuclear weapons after 1998, while America spends to make sure that doesn't change
@@randomasmr5238 you're very stupid to help your enemy buy the weapons to attack you, do you never learn from history?😂 Wait, you were never taught true history. 😂😂
It's the perfect time to strategically corner Pakistan. Stay silent, engage in diplomacy. GCC and America have leverage over Pakistan. Our FTA with GCC can go a long way to have the Arabs a vested interest in us.
@@QabilAGhor if they don't care then why each and every you compare with india... recently your PM said our economy is better than India...That means You care india😂😂😂
I read somewhere that Pakistan’s national security policy wrt India: 1- Blames India for impeding connectivity in the subcontinent 2- It wants to challenge India declaring itself as a net security provider 3- Accuses India & genocide in Kashmir.continue to support (= terrorism) 4- Wants to improve relations with India with “Just and peaceful” resolution of Kashmir at its core 5- Calls “Hindutva” it’s security threat (abusing Modi and India with fake narrative) 6- Concerned about India’s military modernisation, getting nuke exception. 7-It wants to “reimagine” its relations with Russia which it sees as growing rapidly. Largely, the doc focus is on its economy. There is nothing beyond what Pak has not said over the years. Pak security policy is not a peace proposal to India. But to strengthen itself to fight India better. Also helps with perception management Direct hit West which sees it negatively.
Here is one other option. Support Balooch and NWF liberation - exactly in diplomatic, moral, political support that Pakistan does to Kashmir India. Make Pak Army spends lots of money to retain those area or even get them the freedom- with Afghan and Iran support. Make the support of terrorism in Kashmir astronomical using technology, intelligence and merciless killing. Follow the Israli approach to its enemy. Once we reached the strongest point let us discuss the peace. The National Security document is NOT even worth the paper because we cannot trust Pakistan even a bit and need to see
@@webcreatorAZ You assholes are predicting that about RSS since 1925, you predicted same about Modi before 2014. In the meanwhile you did genocide in Malabar in 1921, Kashmir in 1990s, Kolkata in 1946, Pakistan and Bangladesh in 1947, 1971. This is how you cover that, by spreading rumors.
@Tajik Speaker Reaction War is an expensive affair. Where's the money? Pa kistan is bankrupt. I think the status quo is just fine for India. There's no need for India to enter into any deal with pa kistan
@Tajik Speaker Reaction Time will tell if my assumptions are right or wrong. I don't need to follow retired nutc-ases to understand Pa kistan's intentions or capabilities
Couple of points though : (1) what is available to public is only 48 pages. This could just be a eye wash. What is undercover might be very different. (2) Moeeb Yusuf's view on Kashmir in last week's interview on Jirga (Saleem Safi) was different from what is written in the document. So do not go by what is written in the document.
Whatever may it be, India should never accord Pakistan any breathing space under any circumstances. India would be foolish to believe anything the Pakistanis have to say about good relations with India after 7 decades of hostility to India.
@@umerrashid4940 Germany may have occupied France during the second world war, but it didn't fund or train te rrorists - what Pa kistan has been doing for more than 30 years
Their NSA Moeed Yusuf understands very well - peace offering like this, coming from a point of weakness will be dismissed by india. I have heard him say so (many times) in his earlier interviews back when he was still a scholar. He would talk about the economic and power differential with India, and how this gap is rapidly rising. And that india may not be interested in peace at all. He is now the NSA and yet Imran Khan takes this stance. Don't they know the outcome already?
@@jitendivgi2761 I agree, pak army call shots in Pakistan. Whenever army FK things up, they call civilians. This time India should stay away from pak armys bluff.
Dismantle the army role, seriously? No. The army and the govt are working in tandem on domestic and foreign policy. This is best. Unlike in india where a top military commander gets killed with out a public investigation giving rise to foreplay and the govt arrests everyone under sedition laws that oppose the rule.
However much the Pakistan Army has be self centred, It still the only functional institution in Pakistan. All the rest are stupid and fellows with zero patriotism and an group with no brains no loyalty nor of steady mind and coward. Any day I prefer an enemy who can steadfast mind and strong conviction than cowards who like scavengers wait for consuming the carcass. India has to confront the army and reduce them to impotence to achieve permanent peace, and liberation of its much suffering citizens.
@@gautamsawhny6246 we may laugh, but it's their belief in spirtuality and GOD that makes them strong inside.. Economies come and go, character remains. We need to take them seriously..
I don’t understand this North Indian preoccupation of talking with Pak. The document says it cannot talk as long as Modi is in power, so that means no talking until2024 and possibly 2029. So other than analyzing and hearing your wonderful dissection- let them hurt for. Few more years, fix their societies. There is nothing for us to get from Pakistan.
@@ash9x9 All in some kind of a hope of friendship and banter with aki Stan. My suggestion would be to allow them to drift away from their roots towards a Turkic/central Asian part Arab culture and protect our Muslims from that exchange. In a few years they would have destroyed whatever remnants of own culture and identity. There is no other conceivable reason for engaging with them. I am hopeful that in a couple of decades it might be like talking to Turkmenistan or Uzbezkistan- a poor and islamized version of those countries.
@@rohandev1444 agree fully however this particular obsession with pak is not worth spending even 15-20 mins of airtime IMO. There is so much happening elsewhere which can be covered and viewers can gain from rather than pak. No one in the world gives a damn to this country as much India based journalist - esp here.
@@hke.4475 in response to peak 5353 on the LoC, India captured 5310 on the Pakistani-occupied side of LOC in April, 2000. In addition, India captured peak 5240 alias 5245 in October,1999 and thereafter point 5165. Now search and have authentication.😊 Point 5240/5245 is a good observation point to monitor supply route of point 5353.😊
This situation has a Historical resemblance of Shivaji Maharaj's Invitation by Afzal Khan for establishing Peace. Perhaps Afzal khan too wrote to Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Asking for Peace for 100 Years between Marathas and Mughals
Muhammad signed a peace treaty with the tribe of koreish for 10 years and strengthened himself and attacked them in 2 years itself. This has been their strategy since 7th century. Jihad must happen at any cost.
True, Muhammad was a warlord ( a ruthless one) he did not spare anyone who came in his way, Islam is not a religion but a political ideology to conquer the world. After Muhammad's death the ideology was split between two factions ( Shias and Sunnis) both wanting to claim the world but they can't because we have western superpowers and they have understood the long game. India should really break all ties with Pakistan cause for them we still be infidels.
If Pakistan fear BJP ,then all Indians should vote for BJP. I have never seen Pakistan feeling threaten by a government in India, last one may was of Indira government. I still wonder why Congress and other opposition parties when they were in power ,why they didn't removed article 370 from Kashmir, is was simple vote bank politics and it was vote bank politics then why people are still voting for parties like Congress, CPM, TMC.
Pakistani's may fear anything and anyone but to be honest not India. And its a big and absolute not. Just ask the common men in the street, when it come to war or clash with India, they laugh it out by calling Hindus to never known for bravery or fight ( and iam more polite to be honest). They have an exceptional stereotype for Hindus and India. I have never seen a single person even remotely impressed from any Indian.
@@drsalmanh5199 Don't you find it ironical they say that considering most of their ancestors were Hindus? Also Indian military also consists of many Muslim brothers and sisters. Cheers.
@@suryavenkatesan9998 i haven't given my opinion. Iam just talking about the street impression. Iam not the sort of person who stereotype a billion population.
@@drsalmanh5199 You are right in your observation. They need something, some notions to cancel their past and justify two nation theory. Frog of a well, for a reason.
All these policy documents will mean nothing if the Pak army establishment Plots a next Kargil or Mumbai type terror attacks. These attacks dont need that much money too ! A Bayraktar type Drone attacks could also be in their cards. We must play a silent game and bolster our Anti drone and other attack capabilities
That is a very short term goal. You need to bring Pakistan to the table, either give them what they want or buy them out. Make them dependent on you in some way.
Bangladesh realised early to forget west Pakistan and concentrated for welfare of it's people. But it took 74 years for Pakistan to think of its own people rather than neighbour ( read as Kashmir). Hope its future leaders also stick to its promised made to its own people
Pakistan may prepare and issue a document but nobody will believe that they will follow it. Secondly, as far as Indo Pak relationship is concerned, we should drive the agenda. Sad to say there are many Indian bureaucrats , politicians and journalists who are dazzled by Pakistan. Thankfully, most of them have outlived their shelf life but the few who are still around, need to be neutralised.
If Pak is sincere on developing relationship with India, let Pak handover POK Gilgit Baltistan areas to India unconditionally as a confidence building measure and stop claims on Kashmir.
Looking back at Pakistan History it seems the only reason they survived was getting money from the West, particularly the US to use their country to fight Soviets during the Cold War and after 2000 to fight terrorism . Being an Islamic Republic is a huge part of the reason they will struggle to do well. One reason I have a problem with Hindu Extremists is because they want to turn India into something similar to Pakistan . On many Muslim social media places the most extremists always tend to be Pakistanis . They love to equate any suffering Muslims elsewhere go through by bringing up Kashmir . It's just bizarre . India would do well to just continue focusing on improving itself and on forming ties with other countries .
No one is in charge in Pakistan. The Army does not know what the ISI is doing and the civil government just makes it's own announcements. Relations between Pak and India will not improve until Pak supported groups stop their attacks in Kashmir. This mean a peace agreement over Kashmir.
India doesn't want to talk about its occupation in Kashmir, the people will continue to protest their rights, and for their freedom..nothing will really change, the Indian Govt will continue to lie on policies, and incidents..and all will be business as usual🤷♂️
Pakistan is an expensive security state. It will be hard for US/UK to sustain it for longer than they did for 73 years. Gen Bajwee Ghafooree are giving an impression that have given up on jihadi terror but are doing exactly the opposite. Gen Bajwee said the same thing as stated in this National Security Policy 4 years ago in Germany Munich Security Conference "That Pakistan has replaced terrorist jihadi nurturing polices with Geo economics". But nothing has changed. They say good things but do exactly the opposite. Ultimately Pakistan will have to give up on British Colonial established order & adopt more affordable Taliban style of military & governance. They are running out of options.
This document makes me recall Deng Xiaoping's statement of "Laying low" to Chinese communist party. Chinese bought time to come to this stage where it has now become a full fledged rogue state. Although, they always kept their subversive activities in this " Low" mode. Is this document inspired by or orcharasted by China? Will not be surprised if Chinese footprints are involved via Pakistan in this document like their footprints are there in our country via outside and inside cronies of Chinese.
No point in going gaga over something that some other country did, especially when that country is Pakistan. The proof of the pudding is in its eating. Let's just wait and watch for some time.
Bad Economic Situation pushed Pakistan to create good word document.. its not due to change in heart.. I think no contact war is economic war fare and political isolation (which we did extremely well).. as you said i agree to we need to ignore war zone media and as well as left liberal analysis.. or listen to both and make rationale analysis..
@@hke.4475 Relax you jack@$$. No matter what you do, the virus is here to stay. Thank your lucky stars you're still alive and move on. Just because you like to live in panic, does not mean everyone should.
No Need to give Pakistan any space Once they get some money they will do the same that they were doing from past 70 years deradicalization of Kashmir valley is they key for India It Can be done efficiently by following the soviet model that is composite culture + Strict Legislations on religious activities
Money or not..people tend to always stand up for their rights and freedom...Afghanistan is an example.. A baniya will always think it through the lense of money hence not understand untill the flood has passed over the head
Sir, comments from Pakistan itself says that it is like an election manifesto and don't worth the paper it uses to print. Can your team provide more details on India- China relationship and what are the things we see from the next budget perspective ?
India had neutrallized their airforce with deployment of S400 system hence their need for a new security architechure without getting permission from opposition. It could also be to try and fix economy and USA friendship as well.
Early access, exclusive content, special privileges - Discover the great benefits of being a Member of ThePrint’s RUclips channel. Take a Paid Membership today. It costs just Rs 159/month. ruclips.net/channel/UCuyRsHZILrU7ZDIAbGASHdAjoin
Sir, it's been more than 2 years since Anil Swarup Sir and you had Walk the Talk. Would love to hear both of your views on whatever happened since that episode. Can there be an Off the Cuff or similar discussion between you two?
Thank you Shekhar ji, you are the longest lasting and probably the most astute and dare I say 'balanced' and genuinely well meaning editors we have today. (longest lasting because many other editors have lost relevance, but you haven't).
Quite possible that IK might not have read the document. But if someone says he has read it, then that will look credible. But in our case do we have that luxury? 🤔
Shekhar, can you do one episode on what exactly is Pakistan's claim to Kashmir. It certainly was not part of the division. Bothe nations' armies were headed by Brits at that point in time. 'Tribal invaders' came in with Pak army men disguised included. In Gilgit Baltistan the Brit General there took it on himself to 'deliver'. In our wisdom we waited for the Raja of Kashmir to formally 'accede' before 'requesting' the Indian Army to step in and the Prime Minister Nehru took it to UN - legitimizing the 'issue'. After China took parts of Ladakh in 1962, Pakistan gifted away large parts of Aksai Chin to China we cannot get it back. China still contests the rest of Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh and we are not able to assert our sovereignty over these areas authoritatively. One of my friends suggested Kashmir be given to Pakistan or allow self-determination [another Pandora's box] and Ladakh to Chin in return for peace. We will be reduced to a peninsula with hostile neighbors and a necklace strangulating us around our seas and Ocean. Naxals, SDPI, Dravida Nadu and the 'stateless' citizenry' are internal problems waiting to reduce us.
*@PRINT* Thank you for the topical NI! It is noteworthy that in the 62 pages that have released in public domain, India has been mentioned _19_ times (!), Afghanistan _7_ , Iran & Russia 3 each, *_but_* US & China *only 4* times each, Turkey twice and Saudi Arabia only once ("Arab" 0) ...Quite interesting signaling. This is a doc targeted to India & India should very carefully interpret anything.
We still dreaming about country like pokistan , but at the same time country like china ,leave the country like pakistan don't dame care , we need too bulit our economy shame indian media always living behind pokistan..
I have seen some people in North India (especially in Punjab and Delhi) are quite reluctant to openly criticize Pakistan because they see it as their ancestral land. We have to remember that there still are people whose parents and grandparents were born in current-day Pakistan, hence they still seem to harbor some soft corner. A good example is Shah Rukh Khan. Even among older politicians, this is the case.
@@newbiekhyber I believe former PM Manmohan Singh was born in Pakistan. So was former Deputy L K PM Advani. On the Pakistani side, Gen Musharraf was born in Delhi...
Hi SG... Yesterday I heard what WION had to say about this document, as you rightly pointed out, WION just concentrated on the FAF and dismissed it. Thank you for your comprehensive analysis. However, you did not tell what exactly Nawaz Sharifs advisor and the current Senator of Pakistan had said to you. Please do mention what he said if you read this comment.
India never hesitated from talks with Pakistan. However, such commitments have been made and violated in the past (Everything from Karachi agreement to Simla agreement to Lahore Declaration). Pakistan will have to demonstrate its commitments by acting against terrorist groups that are targeting India.
@@sankalp6872 You are right... But that does not mean that we in India dismiss them entirely. This might be a start of something different, after all never before was Pakistans financial status so pathetic. We definitely have a reason to be cautiously optimistic.
@@zeher0015 "Cautious" - Yes. "Optimistic" - We'll need more than a written document for that. It is not just the financial problems, the US has practically abandoned Pakistan, the Islamic Ummah too is uninterested in its tantrums and the Chinese aren't proving to be gullible allies like the west. Chinese loans are very expensive and CPEC is bleeding Pakistan dry. All I can say is that we need not be pessimistic. We need to be PRAGMATIC.
Yes, At least create a strong Constitution which backs secularism or some set of similar values. You can't have Hafiz Saeed and say normalize relationship with India.
Strong anti secular sentiments gaining ground in subcontinent and educated Indians turning against secularism. Sooner or later we will be a theocracy. I think it is not wrong if we adopt gandhi ji concept of ram rajya .
Nothing should make us more happy if sense is finally prevailing in the neighborhood and take this as an opportunity to start a new chapter in the subcontinent. Two big challenges to it will be the domestic politics of ruling party and if Pakistan really means business this time.
Once again Shekharji steals the show. For the last 24 hours I've been scouting Pakistani news channels and commentators for a comprehensive summary of this document. Your analysis, sir is, as I've come to expect, comprehensive, non-partisan and academic. Thank you for existing 🙏🏽 #chanakyadidntsay
It took 3 days to make episode on PM security issue and it just took few hours ( less than a day) to make a episode on this topic. Guptaji's priorities are clear. Save congress. Moreover I feel Guptaji is unemployed these days as congress is out of power and is starving for cash so he tries to cash on India-Pakistan Rivalry and mint something out of that.
Pakistan Army head and PM have been briefed on the fact - Pakistan to collapse between 2022 - 2023 . Even hopes are nil but the only way out is maintain peace with India
@@shsaeed6818 No one wants a country of this size to collapse and pray for a miracle but there is no hope as experts say its as certain as certainity of morning after night
@@shsaeed6818 No one is trying...but this has been Pak tactic since beginning, negotiating with a gun to its own head. Only this time every one is sick of it.
Btw sir, over the past three days, your dressing sense has been awesome. I commented a few days back about it, I don't know if you paid heed to my comment but nonetheless, your dresses are amazing. One thing though, you can try some brighter colours :)
Next episode of The Print should be titled "WHY THE HEAD OFFICE OF THE PRINT SHOULD SHIFT TO ISLAMABAD" followed by a sequel titled "WHY SHEKHAR GUPTA SHOULD BE ISLAMABAD BUREAU CHIEF ASSISTED BY JYOTI MALHOTRA". While in ISLAMABAD they should do an episode "WHY BIN LADEN IS A MARTYR".
I used to admire Shekhar Gupta a lot . He appeared to be balanced. But now somehow, he gives the impression that it is an art he cannot forgo, because that is his style. He cannot be direct like an Arnab Goswami. In this episode, he gives the impression that Pakistan should be given a chance. If they change, it is great. As an Indian, i cannot think it can change. A leopard cannot change it's spots. They are ruined economically. This is the time to crush them once and for all. Not by war, but by economic means. Let them beg. For 70 years they have bled us with 1000 cuts. It is pay back time. As an Indian, it gives me immense pleasure to see them in their knees considering what they have done to us. Kudos to Prime Minister Modi for giving them back in kind and in full measure.
वर्तमान पाकिस्तान की सुरक्षा नीति अस्थायी है। यह तब बदलेगा जब अमेरिकी सरकार उन्हें आर्थिक सहायता देना शुरू करेगी। पूरी दुनिया में वे अपनी विनाशकारी भू-राजनीतिक और विदेश नीति के कारण अलग-थलग हैं। इस दीर्घ विश्लेषण के लिए आपका धन्यवाद शेखर जी l
Don’t be fooled, ours is a zero sum relationship since 1947. A strong and economically prosperous Pakistan will better fund and arm proxies against India.
@@maxxter90 I don’t hate Pakistan or it’s people. I just respect the force of religious ideology. A policy written on a piece of paper cannot change the ideological hatred inside the minds of 95% of the population.
@@shantanushekharsjunerft9783 common bro.. we are the same... both countries hate each other.. Hindu vs Muslim.. centuries of war and conflict can do that.. If Pak has sent terrorists to India, trust me we've done the same in different wars and conflicts.. in short, there is no winner in this debate. Both countries can benefit more in living with harmony.. We can't afford a two front war with pak and China... Look at China, where they have gone, if we didn't have Pak conflict, we would have been more powerful than China.
@@maxxter90 bhai it’s not personal. I am talking national security of 1.2 billion people. The US never took the foot off Soviet Union’s neck even after it went bankrupt. Compare the difference between 1970 and present Afghanistan to realize that Pakistan did the same to them. China will do the same to us if presented with an opportunity. I will argue that an economically weak Pakistan will be forced to deal with internal problems and will be a negligible threat to our borders.
Firstly , Respect from Pakistani American. You articulate things brilliantly. On this video , forced to write a comment ( Which I usually don’t) , your initial sentences to undermine and ridicule Pakistan in a manner mentioning Not here , others do it , is very disappointing. Please do see it from a non Hindutva or Global Indian prism. For a successful India , a successful region is a must. Please do talk about giving Tempe rights to Kashmiris as per the Indian promises and please focus on regional progress need. Again , respect and Love 💐
Even I felt like he was throwing some shades at the beginning which doesn't justify his journalism...idk why he did that (if you're a regular viewer then you'd know it's very unlike SG sir) Also, he doesn't view anything from Hindutva lens.
@@Theactualstoic Thank you. Moodi is enough to bring that Indian house down. Thank you for not thinking about Pakistan, please leave us alone and let the region progress. By the way your Army chief just said he wants to attack Pakistan now and oh yes, please tell your patriot news channels to stop doing shows on Pakistan every night since the people don’t care. Oh another thing, please do give Abhinandan our regards.
As you mentioned Abhinandan, please give regards to the PAF guy whom your army buried without mention after ISPR General accidentally indicated the "2nd pilot in custody"... And i find you pakistani guys very cute when the most radicalised jihadist nation founded on the basis of Hindu hatred tries to tell India how to be inclusive and treat it's minorities...
Mr. Gupta, thanks for giving a snapshot of the Indian perspective about the NSP of Pakistan. India should be concerned about the classified section of the Pakistani National Security Policy; Pakistanis have are not in the habit of giving India or the USA a walkover in the maters of their national pilers. Kashmir is one of the pillars of its national foreign policy in its relationship with India. It would remain so as long as it's not settled according to their declared and undeclared stance objectives.
So basically it's a waste of paper essay penned by someone's frenzied feverish dreams with dollops of space given to flights of imagination that will go into the dustbin in a few days time.
@@zaffazad4040 according to un resolution 1st pak army will have to leave pok give it to india and then there will be voting, first read the full resolution and then talk
Haha I really hope y'all keep up with your obsession of Kashmir. Indian is arming itself up and forcing you into an arms race, which like the USSR against US you won't survive. Pakistani collapse is inevitable. Either you enter into an arms race and bankrupt yourself or you don't arm yourself up and get colonised by india. Haha you're doomed and your last hope is China which is also being cornered by global democratic alliance, talk about bad decision making to be in Chinese block 😂😂.
You have to be clearly assessing pakistani national security policy…. He mentioned no conflict but not mentioned on stopping cross border terrorism and militancy
@prasanth kandra
Your India too is involved in terrorism inside Pakistan. Your country isolated our Eastern Wing in 1971 and yet calls Pakistan a terrorism hub? Don't you question your country's policy?
@@zahirshah22 and that explains how uneducated you and your countrymen are. The need of the hour in your country is a proper education. And a history lesson which tells you the truth and not a history lesson which is a propaganda.
@@zahirshah22 Dear Zahir zanab, Do you ever thought about genocide committed by Pakistan army on poor Bangladeshis, raping thousands of women etc etc….
@@Drkp23
Thanks bro..atleast you used polite words...for conversation..Mr. Amith Prabhu .. called me uneducated...
Dear ... please listen to Mr. Yuri Bezmenov....the Ex Propaganda expert in KGB... please listen to him as to how USSR and India together created and supported Mukti Bahni...that will have thugs and murdurers as its members ...who would execute the East Pakistan civilians, rape women and then the whole bloody blame would be thrown upon Pakistan army...
For the past 2 decades India used Afghan soil to send terrorists into Pakistan... you don't know all this ..but people in your intelligence know this..
Take care..
Has Russia ever accepted meddling in former Soviet states? Pakistan has maintained it does not support terrorism so why hinting it? This is not how things are run.
Before 1965 war, President of Pakistan Ayub khan had given a statement in their bilateral conversation with Americans- "we want to have a joint military with India to fight communists"...... When Atal Bihari Bajpayee was visiting Pakistan to build goodwill gesture, pakistani soldiers were occupying vacanted Indian Peaks in Kargil..... These security reports are just a way to avert temporary difficulties Pakistan is facing...
Actually he offered joint security against China when he felt that China is common threat. Our establishment (mainly Nehruji) declined offer on the ground that China is a friend and Pakistan is bound to come back to India.
I agree with you fully.
@@IndiaTides Not exactly. It is true that Ayub Khan proposed a joint defense pact against China in 1959. It is also true that Nehru rejected it but the reason was Ayub Khan's insistence on a solution to Kashmir. Nehru made many blunders but more often than not, these were because circumstances forced Nehru into the corner. The biggest blunder that India ever made was the Simla agreement where for the first time we had a clear upper hand against Pak but Indira Gandhi did a Prithviraj Chauhan.
@@sankalp6872 I read up that the answer was why should we make the pact against such a good friend. The answer is quoted in one of the article based on the book. The other claim of Indira did Prithviraj was completely wrong. We made clear at that time that we are against genocide of Bangladeshi and we are attacking strictly base on our moral ground. The idea that we use that opportunity to benefit us would have undermined our moral standing and we would have lost our international support drastically. They lost the half of their country and demanding more would have been untenable besides would have kept that wound fester much more. Don't do revision of decision based on assumptions. See that in the context of that time.
@@IndiaTides America provided aid & military support to Pakistan with the condition that Pakistan would participate in fight against communism... But Pakistan's objective was to take America money & technology to prepare for war against India.... When America demanded Pakistani support in Korean War, Pakistan made excuses.... So offering India to form a joint military against China was basically another facade just to show Americans that they are sincere.... What they really wanted happened in 1965.
Hard to believe anything about mutual cooperation from the ones who stabbed us in the back by starting Kargil war just a few months from the inauguration of Kartarpur corridor.
+1.
+1
You mean few months after Lahore bus trip of Vajpayee.
Asked about his plans on Egyptian television in 1998, Arafat explained that strategic pause was a venerable Islamic strategy, referring specifically to the “Khudaibiya agreement” in which the Prophet Mohammed made a ten-year treaty with the Arabian tribe of Koreish, but broke it after two years - during which his forces used the security of the pact to marshal their strength - and then conquered the Koreish tribe.
Pakistaniyat is based on "hindu-hatred" and jihad against hindus...
This ideology is at the heart of every Pakistani - which is not going change in 100 years!
Koresh had invaded Medina 3 times before this Hudabiyah Pact.
Hudaibiyah was on Koresh's terms.
@@umerrashid4940 for your easy understanding- the bottom line is India should reject any so called peace talks with jihadis, backstabbers and country which never stayed true to its promises... hammering of pak economy should continue....you can't trust a country that has conned US and Afghans too. now cope.
Chanakyaneeti rules.
@@EILF7842 then beg for peace wth China..
@@umerrashid4940 China is ur boss. Don't pretend to be the master.
@@mlg1279 then lick USA
Bhutto once boasted of fighting India for 1000 years even if they eat only grass. Now they want a drinks break of 100 years! What for? To cultivate enough grass? That India can supply them free of cost on humanitarian grounds!!
Feed your own enemy and strengthen them to wage jihad against you once again, average hindu lmao.
@@muditshrimali I said about feeding them grass for 1000 years
Once America start Aid again their so called national security policy will change overnight
Why would America aid them again
@@sra1354 Simple. They have to aid them. Pakistan have American military equipments from fighter jets to tanks to almost everything. And America needs to keep an eye on Pakistan's nuclear weapons. It is a constant threat and the danger is clear and present. The only reason they haven't been sanctioned like north korea is because they haven't tested their nuclear weapons after 1998, while America spends to make sure that doesn't change
India should spare no cost to prolong or continue pakistan's misery in whatever form it can.
Why? We should help the region economically grow, that would be better
@@randomasmr5238 all regions except pakistan. That is better.
@@randomasmr5238 you're very stupid to help your enemy buy the weapons to attack you, do you never learn from history?😂 Wait, you were never taught true history. 😂😂
@@rangan565 such things are beyond trust and mistrust, you chip them away slowly or destroy them when given the chance.
Says a lot about a person's character when they take pleasure in another's misery!
It's the perfect time to strategically corner Pakistan.
Stay silent, engage in diplomacy. GCC and America have leverage over Pakistan. Our FTA with GCC can go a long way to have the Arabs a vested interest in us.
Pakistani...They don't follow their own rule
India has been trying that for the last 74 years but has not succeeded.
@@QabilAGhor we don't give a daam to Pakistani...they are poor than our Uttar Pradesh...So we don't care about them
@@sra2z Pakistan doesn't care either. I was just responding to Kunal
@@QabilAGhor if they don't care then why each and every you compare with india... recently your PM said our economy is better than India...That means You care india😂😂😂
I read somewhere that Pakistan’s national security policy wrt India:
1- Blames India for impeding connectivity in the subcontinent
2- It wants to challenge India declaring itself as a net security provider
3- Accuses India & genocide in Kashmir.continue to support (= terrorism)
4- Wants to improve relations with India with “Just and peaceful” resolution of Kashmir at its core
5- Calls “Hindutva” it’s security threat (abusing Modi and India with fake narrative)
6- Concerned about India’s military modernisation, getting nuke exception.
7-It wants to “reimagine” its relations with Russia which it sees as growing rapidly. Largely, the doc focus is on its economy.
There is nothing beyond what Pak has not said over the years.
Pak security policy is not a peace proposal to India. But to strengthen itself to fight India better. Also helps with perception management Direct hit West which sees it negatively.
You are the firs onet who try to figure it out best way..other all fuxkedup
Here is one other option. Support Balooch and NWF liberation - exactly in diplomatic, moral, political support that Pakistan does to Kashmir India. Make Pak Army spends lots of money to retain those area or even get them the freedom- with Afghan and Iran support. Make the support of terrorism in Kashmir astronomical using technology, intelligence and merciless killing. Follow the Israli approach to its enemy. Once we reached the strongest point let us discuss the peace. The National Security document is NOT even worth the paper because we cannot trust Pakistan even a bit and need to see
This will be there original agenda.
You are right. Palki Sharma Upadhyay’s post provides a more realistic assessment of the document.
@@webcreatorAZ You assholes are predicting that about RSS since 1925, you predicted same about Modi before 2014. In the meanwhile you did genocide in Malabar in 1921, Kashmir in 1990s, Kolkata in 1946, Pakistan and Bangladesh in 1947, 1971. This is how you cover that, by spreading rumors.
This is the time to go on full diplomatic offensive. India should not repeat the same mistake of trusting Pakistan over and over again.
@Tajik Speaker Reaction War is an expensive affair. Where's the money? Pa kistan is bankrupt.
I think the status quo is just fine for India. There's no need for India to enter into any deal with pa kistan
@Tajik Speaker Reaction I think India has the capacity to withstand whatever Pa kistan does.
It's best for India to leave Pa kistan to its fate.
@Tajik Speaker Reaction Time will tell if my assumptions are right or wrong. I don't need to follow retired nutc-ases to understand Pa kistan's intentions or capabilities
@Tajik Speaker Reaction India's future has nothing to do with Pa kistan.
Regards 🙏 Btw, are you a Pa kistani or a Tajik?
@Tajik Speaker Reaction ara madarsachap agar ham tumsa trade nahi karenga toh nuclear war karonga
Wah kya scene ha
Couple of points though : (1) what is available to public is only 48 pages. This could just be a eye wash. What is undercover might be very different. (2) Moeeb Yusuf's view on Kashmir in last week's interview on Jirga (Saleem Safi) was different from what is written in the document.
So do not go by what is written in the document.
Mr Gupta does not live in a real world.
@@rakeshrathore4253 Mr Gupta is burden for Indian and adversaries more than benefit to India.
Anything can change anytime.. the moment they get a little better economically.. then they will get back to their true colors
Very true sir
ruclips.net/video/7D4vNcK6D38/видео.html They have a point !!
The moment trade starts b/w the 2 countries all tension will sunside
Whatever may it be, India should never accord Pakistan any breathing space under any circumstances. India would be foolish to believe anything the Pakistanis have to say about good relations with India after 7 decades of hostility to India.
Best time to destroy the terrorist state and bring peace to the region.
Even Germany and France used to say about eachother, not to let breathing space left for the other.
@@umerrashid4940 time is the ultimate factor
@@umerrashid4940 Germany may have occupied France during the second world war, but it didn't fund or train te rrorists - what Pa kistan has been doing for more than 30 years
Germany and Japan even share a border 😂
to keep it simple and short , India should say "absolutely not" .
Their NSA Moeed Yusuf understands very well - peace offering like this, coming from a point of weakness will be dismissed by india. I have heard him say so (many times) in his earlier interviews back when he was still a scholar. He would talk about the economic and power differential with India, and how this gap is rapidly rising. And that india may not be interested in peace at all.
He is now the NSA and yet Imran Khan takes this stance. Don't they know the outcome already?
Or maybe they have something that is making them believe that they are in position of strength.
@@daniyalamed2960 Delusions of grandeur, you mean?
@@mlg1279 delusions of adequacy
Until the role of Army in Pakistan remains intact in foreign policy formation, the chances of good relations between India and Pakistan appear remote.
Well said! The Army establishment has to be dismantled!
@@jitendivgi2761 I agree, pak army call shots in Pakistan. Whenever army FK things up, they call civilians. This time India should stay away from pak armys bluff.
Dismantle the army role, seriously? No. The army and the govt are working in tandem on domestic and foreign policy. This is best. Unlike in india where a top military commander gets killed with out a public investigation giving rise to foreplay and the govt arrests everyone under sedition laws that oppose the rule.
@@h.6725 😂😂😂 ask ur imran khan to import extra copium for the likes of you
However much the Pakistan Army has be self centred, It still the only functional institution in Pakistan.
All the rest are stupid and fellows with zero patriotism and an group with no brains no loyalty nor of steady mind and coward. Any day I prefer an enemy who can steadfast mind and strong conviction than cowards who like scavengers wait for consuming the carcass.
India has to confront the army and reduce them to impotence to achieve permanent peace, and liberation of its much suffering citizens.
My main reason of surprise is that, the Paxtanis think that their "country" will exist for 100 more years
Just hear this out and you'll believe why they think like this ruclips.net/video/7D4vNcK6D38/видео.html
🤣🤣
@@gautamsawhny6246 we may laugh, but it's their belief in spirtuality and GOD that makes them strong inside.. Economies come and go, character remains. We need to take them seriously..
I don’t understand this North Indian preoccupation of talking with Pak. The document says it cannot talk as long as Modi is in power, so that means no talking until2024 and possibly 2029. So other than analyzing and hearing your wonderful dissection- let them hurt for. Few more years, fix their societies. There is nothing for us to get from Pakistan.
Agreed.We need to be obsessive about our defense from our shifty neighbours.
No one is as Pak obsessed as much as this particular anchor. He would have done more talks on Pak than on China it seems.
@@ash9x9 All in some kind of a hope of friendship and banter with aki Stan. My suggestion would be to allow them to drift away from their roots towards a Turkic/central Asian part Arab culture and protect our Muslims from that exchange. In a few years they would have destroyed whatever remnants of own culture and identity. There is no other conceivable reason for engaging with them. I am hopeful that in a couple of decades it might be like talking to Turkmenistan or Uzbezkistan- a poor and islamized version of those countries.
@@rohandev1444 agree fully however this particular obsession with pak is not worth spending even 15-20 mins of airtime IMO. There is so much happening elsewhere which can be covered and viewers can gain from rather than pak. No one in the world gives a damn to this country as much India based journalist - esp here.
@@ash9x9 lutyens media is pakistani mouthpiece in India , sooner you understand the easier it will be.
Funny thing is, this is exactly what Sushant Sareen had predicted. It's only us Indians who'll take this document seriously🤣
Just look at Shekhars dramatics and theatrics.
It's like inviting for *Lahore-Bus-Travel* diplomacy and in the backyard, preparing for Kargil like misadventure.
Kargil wasn’t a misadventure tho Pakistan army got point 53533 which is strategically very important
@@hke.4475 in response to peak 5353 on the LoC, India captured 5310 on the Pakistani-occupied side of LOC in April, 2000. In addition, India captured peak 5240 alias 5245 in October,1999 and thereafter point 5165. Now search and have authentication.😊 Point 5240/5245 is a good observation point to monitor supply route of point 5353.😊
@@hke.4475 what happened jihadi answer the question above🤣🤣
Even Najam Sethi not taking this policy seriously.
Correct, I too have seen Najam Sethi's video. He feels Pakistan national security policy is a joke.
@@moshemalekar2995 I'm drinking. Let Sethi come n have some 🍷 with me. It'd be great to hear him out. He loves 🍷, I know that. شارب
@@ranjittyagi2846 he would prefer using 🍷 with that sexy babe in his show
@@ranjittyagi2846 even Imran would have loved to join you ... Everyone needs change in taste after having weeds and LSD...😎😉
@@sb9060 np, he's welcome. Let's be merry for at least some time. 🥳
This situation has a Historical resemblance of Shivaji Maharaj's Invitation by Afzal Khan for establishing Peace. Perhaps Afzal khan too wrote to Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Asking for Peace for 100 Years between Marathas and Mughals
Muhammad signed a peace treaty with the tribe of koreish for 10 years and strengthened himself and attacked them in 2 years itself.
This has been their strategy since 7th century. Jihad must happen at any cost.
True, Muhammad was a warlord ( a ruthless one) he did not spare anyone who came in his way, Islam is not a religion but a political ideology to conquer the world. After Muhammad's death the ideology was split between two factions ( Shias and Sunnis) both wanting to claim the world but they can't because we have western superpowers and they have understood the long game. India should really break all ties with Pakistan cause for them we still be infidels.
Jihad ka darr mujhe acha laga..
A Sikh with ancestors from Pakistan who migrated during Partition fighting the 🐷.
Exactly... Jihd above all. Its a political dominance masquerading as religion.
@@artis4985 koi darta nhi h jihad se, Pakistan is asking for infidels money, kyuki bhooke pait jihad nhi hota.
Just trying to remind that the Pakistani army was trying to capture Kargil while vajpayee was in their country on a friendly mission. Trust but verify
If Pakistan fear BJP ,then all Indians should vote for BJP.
I have never seen Pakistan feeling threaten by a government in India, last one may was of Indira government.
I still wonder why Congress and other opposition parties when they were in power ,why they didn't removed article 370 from Kashmir, is was simple vote bank politics and it was vote bank politics then why people are still voting for parties like Congress, CPM, TMC.
No one in Pakistan fears ANY Indian Govt, you can vote for whoever you want to.
Pakistani's may fear anything and anyone but to be honest not India. And its a big and absolute not. Just ask the common men in the street, when it come to war or clash with India, they laugh it out by calling Hindus to never known for bravery or fight ( and iam more polite to be honest). They have an exceptional stereotype for Hindus and India. I have never seen a single person even remotely impressed from any Indian.
@@drsalmanh5199 Don't you find it ironical they say that considering most of their ancestors were Hindus? Also Indian military also consists of many Muslim brothers and sisters. Cheers.
@@suryavenkatesan9998 i haven't given my opinion. Iam just talking about the street impression. Iam not the sort of person who stereotype a billion population.
@@drsalmanh5199 You are right in your observation. They need something, some notions to cancel their past and justify two nation theory. Frog of a well, for a reason.
All these policy documents will mean nothing if the Pak army establishment Plots a next Kargil or Mumbai type terror attacks. These attacks dont need that much money too ! A Bayraktar type Drone attacks could also be in their cards. We must play a silent game and bolster our Anti drone and other attack capabilities
That is a very short term goal. You need to bring Pakistan to the table, either give them what they want or buy them out. Make them dependent on you in some way.
It's not old wine in an old bottle. It's spoiled wine in a garbage bottle.
@@islooboyrashid5927 Feeling pain darling? Know it's hard to digest the true position of your doggie country.
@@islooboyrashid5927 you lost your initials long back..converted jihadi...
@@islooboyrashid5927 you're not even Pakistani. Don't make BJP's accusations right.
As a Hindu with ancestors which came from India fighting against the 🐷.. I am proud Jihad is feared of Hindutva... Aurangzeb was afraid of Shivaji..
Bangladesh realised early to forget west Pakistan and concentrated for welfare of it's people. But it took 74 years for Pakistan to think of its own people rather than neighbour ( read as Kashmir). Hope its future leaders also stick to its promised made to its own people
Pakistan's security policy can be reduced to just 1 line if they really want to be secure. i.e.
"We give up Kashmir"... 40+ pages not required.
Pakistan may prepare and issue a document but nobody will believe that they will follow it. Secondly, as far as Indo Pak relationship is concerned, we should drive the agenda. Sad to say there are many Indian bureaucrats , politicians and journalists who are dazzled by Pakistan. Thankfully, most of them have outlived their shelf life but the few who are still around, need to be neutralised.
What this means for India?
Nothing!!
Just continue to focus on your growth.
Imran hasn't even read the document: nailed it!😂😂😂😂
If Pak is sincere on developing relationship with India, let Pak handover POK Gilgit Baltistan areas to India unconditionally as a confidence building measure and stop claims on Kashmir.
Looking back at Pakistan History it seems the only reason they survived was getting money from the West, particularly the US to use their country to fight Soviets during the Cold War and after 2000 to fight terrorism . Being an Islamic Republic is a huge part of the reason they will struggle to do well. One reason I have a problem with Hindu Extremists is because they want to turn India into something similar to Pakistan . On many Muslim social media places the most extremists always tend to be Pakistanis . They love to equate any suffering Muslims elsewhere go through by bringing up Kashmir . It's just bizarre . India would do well to just continue focusing on improving itself and on forming ties with other countries .
Yes I have seen it a lot. We need a solution to that problem most of the pages on fb and insta are run by the Indians.
No one is in charge in Pakistan. The Army does not know what the ISI is doing and the civil government just makes it's own announcements. Relations between Pak and India will not improve until Pak supported groups stop their attacks in Kashmir. This mean a peace agreement over Kashmir.
India doesn't want to talk about its occupation in Kashmir, the people will continue to protest their rights, and for their freedom..nothing will really change, the Indian Govt will continue to lie on policies, and incidents..and all will be business as usual🤷♂️
Lmao talk about arms and drugs smuggled by tons in Punjab
@@muditshrimali arms in Punjab, not anymore
@@ranjittyagi2846 a grenade was found near Amritsar just day before yesterday lmao
@@gazzy2012ga India is the legal owner of Kashmir. It's pointless for Pa kistan to keep repeating the blunders of the past
Bjorn Borg said, "Once you have your opponent beaten, finish them off,
don't ease off and allow the match to go to 5 sets"
Pakistan is an expensive security state. It will be hard for US/UK to sustain it for longer than they did for 73 years. Gen Bajwee Ghafooree are giving an impression that have given up on jihadi terror but are doing exactly the opposite. Gen Bajwee said the same thing as stated in this National Security Policy 4 years ago in Germany Munich Security Conference "That Pakistan has replaced terrorist jihadi nurturing polices with Geo economics". But nothing has changed. They say good things but do exactly the opposite. Ultimately Pakistan will have to give up on British Colonial established order & adopt more affordable Taliban style of military & governance. They are running out of options.
trust me nobody is buying this bs...this is just waste of paper nothing more
As one journalist phrased it, "that is not how it works. You can't export vegetables with a side of terror".
We want Imran to remain as the PM, Inshallah!
Haha i see what u did there 😬🤣
This document makes me recall Deng Xiaoping's statement of "Laying low" to Chinese communist party. Chinese bought time to come to this stage where it has now become a full fledged rogue state. Although, they always kept their subversive activities in this " Low" mode. Is this document inspired by or orcharasted by China? Will not be surprised if Chinese footprints are involved via Pakistan in this document like their footprints are there in our country via outside and inside cronies of Chinese.
Its easy to substitute Lassi with Wine but very difficult to replace intention of Pak Establishment......
No point in going gaga over something that some other country did, especially when that country is Pakistan. The proof of the pudding is in its eating. Let's just wait and watch for some time.
Any policy announcement from Pakistan is so cute 🥰🥰🥰
Bad Economic Situation pushed Pakistan to create good word document.. its not due to change in heart.. I think no contact war is economic war fare and political isolation (which we did extremely well).. as you said i agree to we need to ignore war zone media and as well as left liberal analysis.. or listen to both and make rationale analysis..
Pakistan is struggling by financial crisis.
India should ramp up its oxygen production third wave my take a toll on india again
@@hke.4475 Relax you jack@$$. No matter what you do, the virus is here to stay. Thank your lucky stars you're still alive and move on. Just because you like to live in panic, does not mean everyone should.
If yours enemy is weak try to finished them off
Send abhinandan in a jet
No Need to give Pakistan any space
Once they get some money they will do the same that they were doing from past 70 years deradicalization of Kashmir valley is they key for India It Can be done efficiently by following the soviet model that is composite culture + Strict Legislations on religious activities
Money or not..people tend to always stand up for their rights and freedom...Afghanistan is an example..
A baniya will always think it through the lense of money hence not understand untill the flood has passed over the head
@@shsaeed6818 or balochistan! BLA also standing for their rights. Why your army killing them?
Biggest Question is why only 100 year, means the mind set is same we will fight once we become strong.
Sir, comments from Pakistan itself says that it is like an election manifesto and don't worth the paper it uses to print. Can your team provide more details on India- China relationship and what are the things we see from the next budget perspective ?
India had neutrallized their airforce with deployment of S400 system hence their need for a new security architechure without getting permission from opposition. It could also be to try and fix economy and USA friendship as well.
Early access, exclusive content, special privileges - Discover the great benefits of being a Member of ThePrint’s RUclips channel. Take a Paid Membership today. It costs just Rs 159/month. ruclips.net/channel/UCuyRsHZILrU7ZDIAbGASHdAjoin
@@arsalanmirza3716 antisemitic 👎
Why try to be a perpetual benefactor of Pakistan?
@@arsalanmirza3716 Dismantle hell first, you have gone from bad to worse. Nobody trusts your sales pitch.
@@arsalanmirza3716 I was not addressing you people.
@@arsalanmirza3716 No I don't see anything of hell around me. People who imagine hell create it around themselves. Good day.
A snake will always be a snake.
Sir, it's been more than 2 years since Anil Swarup Sir and you had Walk the Talk. Would love to hear both of your views on whatever happened since that episode.
Can there be an Off the Cuff or similar discussion between you two?
1:17 "Old wine in old bottle, sorry sorry sorry old lassi in old bottle" where do you get such gems from SG ??
Hi bhagwaan this man is taking this doc seriously and doing such a big session on this.
Also inhone pure video mai kya bola kuch samajh nahi aaya.
Thank you Shekhar ji, you are the longest lasting and probably the most astute and dare I say 'balanced' and genuinely well meaning editors we have today. (longest lasting because many other editors have lost relevance, but you haven't).
Quite possible that IK might not have read the document. But if someone says he has read it, then that will look credible. But in our case do we have that luxury? 🤔
Shekhar, can you do one episode on what exactly is Pakistan's claim to Kashmir. It certainly was not part of the division. Bothe nations' armies were headed by Brits at that point in time. 'Tribal invaders' came in with Pak army men disguised included. In Gilgit Baltistan the Brit General there took it on himself to 'deliver'. In our wisdom we waited for the Raja of Kashmir to formally 'accede' before 'requesting' the Indian Army to step in and the Prime Minister Nehru took it to UN - legitimizing the 'issue'.
After China took parts of Ladakh in 1962, Pakistan gifted away large parts of Aksai Chin to China we cannot get it back. China still contests the rest of Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh and we are not able to assert our sovereignty over these areas authoritatively.
One of my friends suggested Kashmir be given to Pakistan or allow self-determination [another Pandora's box] and Ladakh to Chin in return for peace. We will be reduced to a peninsula with hostile neighbors and a necklace strangulating us around our seas and Ocean. Naxals, SDPI, Dravida Nadu and the 'stateless' citizenry' are internal problems waiting to reduce us.
Thank god ajk is away from you Indians and by the sight what happen in 1990 kashmir Kashmiris don’t like you Indians at all
nothing, just the argument of muslims majority
*@PRINT* Thank you for the topical NI! It is noteworthy that in the 62 pages that have released in public domain, India has been mentioned _19_ times (!), Afghanistan _7_ , Iran & Russia 3 each, *_but_* US & China *only 4* times each, Turkey twice and Saudi Arabia only once ("Arab" 0) ...Quite interesting signaling. This is a doc targeted to India & India should very carefully interpret anything.
Among all political analysis ,yours and Pradeep singhji very genuine. Thank you
Indian media as crazy as ever..on wishful thinking.
We still dreaming about country like pokistan , but at the same time country like china ,leave the country like pakistan don't dame care , we need too bulit our economy shame indian media always living behind pokistan..
General timepass, if Pakistan forgets Kashmir for 100 years, what happens to the military establishment?
You don't have to say 'quote unquote evil' simply evil better suits them.
I have seen some people in North India (especially in Punjab and Delhi) are quite reluctant to openly criticize Pakistan because they see it as their ancestral land. We have to remember that there still are people whose parents and grandparents were born in current-day Pakistan, hence they still seem to harbor some soft corner. A good example is Shah Rukh Khan. Even among older politicians, this is the case.
@@newbiekhyber I believe former PM Manmohan Singh was born in Pakistan. So was former Deputy L K PM Advani. On the Pakistani side, Gen Musharraf was born in Delhi...
Which iPad model is he using? Anyone know? Please do answer?
Guptaji, I know there's a lot on your plate with the 5 state elections but a fellow 'Aryan' is in trouble. Can you do an episode on Novac Djokovic?
This National Security Policy means nothing but “pichwade pe aag lagi hai to kua to khodna padega”
Should we be grateful to Pakistan if they have not demanded reversal of our 05 August action? This is absurd.
No-contact warfare could also mean hurting them economically or through other related concerns like water diplomacy.
You just Nailed it Bro....
India is also using water diplomacy with Bangladesh.
Hi SG... Yesterday I heard what WION had to say about this document, as you rightly pointed out, WION just concentrated on the FAF and dismissed it. Thank you for your comprehensive analysis. However, you did not tell what exactly Nawaz Sharifs advisor and the current Senator of Pakistan had said to you. Please do mention what he said if you read this comment.
India never hesitated from talks with Pakistan. However, such commitments have been made and violated in the past (Everything from Karachi agreement to Simla agreement to Lahore Declaration). Pakistan will have to demonstrate its commitments by acting against terrorist groups that are targeting India.
@@sankalp6872 You are right... But that does not mean that we in India dismiss them entirely. This might be a start of something different, after all never before was Pakistans financial status so pathetic. We definitely have a reason to be cautiously optimistic.
@@zeher0015 "Cautious" - Yes. "Optimistic" - We'll need more than a written document for that. It is not just the financial problems, the US has practically abandoned Pakistan, the Islamic Ummah too is uninterested in its tantrums and the Chinese aren't proving to be gullible allies like the west. Chinese loans are very expensive and CPEC is bleeding Pakistan dry. All I can say is that we need not be pessimistic. We need to be PRAGMATIC.
@@sankalp6872 Pragmatic as well as patient and open to new possibilities or deviations from our past experiences.
@@spectrum_X Let's wait and watch :) I hope you are wrong but you can always say that you had already said so :)
Love u Sir, from Pakistan.
Take Pakistan seriously only if they change their internal policies, like taking a step towards secularism..
Correct point.
Yes, At least create a strong Constitution which backs secularism or some set of similar values.
You can't have Hafiz Saeed and say normalize relationship with India.
You should try to be secular yourself.
@@Warlock786 Atleast we're Not a "Failed State" as our Western Neighbour is 😂😂
Strong anti secular sentiments gaining ground in subcontinent and educated Indians turning against secularism. Sooner or later we will be a theocracy. I think it is not wrong if we adopt gandhi ji concept of ram rajya .
Nothing should make us more happy if sense is finally prevailing in the neighborhood and take this as an opportunity to start a new chapter in the subcontinent. Two big challenges to it will be the domestic politics of ruling party and if Pakistan really means business this time.
By Pakistan you mean Pakistani army?
@@ssb9054 ha ha true :) Rawalpindi
Why should we be happy?
Has Pa kistan stopped sending te rrorists into the Kashmir valley?
Has Pa kistan sent 26/11 culprits or Dawood?
Once again Shekharji steals the show. For the last 24 hours I've been scouting Pakistani news channels and commentators for a comprehensive summary of this document. Your analysis, sir is, as I've come to expect, comprehensive, non-partisan and academic. Thank you for existing 🙏🏽
#chanakyadidntsay
wish we could speed read your show. great content presented in the most convoluted and meandering manner.
It took 3 days to make episode on PM security issue and it just took few hours ( less than a day) to make a episode on this topic. Guptaji's priorities are clear. Save congress. Moreover I feel Guptaji is unemployed these days as congress is out of power and is starving for cash so he tries to cash on India-Pakistan Rivalry and mint something out of that.
This is the first time I have seen Shekhar Sir looking at the screen so much. This hampered the flow of the episode
Pakistan Army head and PM have been briefed on the fact - Pakistan to collapse between 2022 - 2023 . Even hopes are nil but the only way out is maintain peace with India
Same is being said in 1947 abt 1948 and repeated since :D
@@shsaeed6818 No one wants a country of this size to collapse and pray for a miracle but there is no hope as experts say its as certain as certainity of morning after night
@@kaps3767
Any 1 can try if they want. Sanctions, wars, terrorism, FATFs and now economy..nothing is working to budge 'that nudge'.
@@shsaeed6818 well I wish your my predictions is wrong as wee don't want another Afghanistan next to India
@@shsaeed6818 No one is trying...but this has been Pak tactic since beginning, negotiating with a gun to its own head. Only this time every one is sick of it.
Pakistan has driven itself to irrelevance. India should rather strengthen ties with Bangladesh. It is one of our largest export partner
The real question is, DOES THE PAKISTANI ARMY REALLY CARE?
I always enjoy your analyses😎👍🏻
Never told us what the Kashmir stance was
The Kashmiri issue is still the same..why should it change ?
@@gazzy2012ga I mean what the adviser said
Can you please share link of the soft copy of unclassified section of the policy
Btw sir, over the past three days, your dressing sense has been awesome. I commented a few days back about it, I don't know if you paid heed to my comment but nonetheless, your dresses are amazing. One thing though, you can try some brighter colours :)
Taking Pakistan and China by word, how smart is that?!
Next episode of The Print should be titled "WHY THE HEAD OFFICE OF THE PRINT SHOULD SHIFT TO ISLAMABAD" followed by a sequel titled "WHY SHEKHAR GUPTA SHOULD BE ISLAMABAD BUREAU CHIEF ASSISTED BY JYOTI MALHOTRA".
While in ISLAMABAD they should do an episode "WHY BIN LADEN IS A MARTYR".
I used to admire Shekhar Gupta a lot . He appeared to be balanced. But now somehow, he gives the impression that it is an art he cannot forgo, because that is his style. He cannot be direct like an Arnab Goswami. In this episode, he gives the impression that Pakistan should be given a chance. If they change, it is great. As an Indian, i cannot think it can change. A leopard cannot change it's spots. They are ruined economically. This is the time to crush them once and for all. Not by war, but by economic means. Let them beg. For 70 years they have bled us with 1000 cuts. It is pay back time. As an Indian, it gives me immense pleasure to see them in their knees considering what they have done to us. Kudos to Prime Minister Modi for giving them back in kind and in full measure.
I love the humor SG. Never fail to make me grin at least one every video.
वर्तमान पाकिस्तान की सुरक्षा नीति अस्थायी है। यह तब बदलेगा जब अमेरिकी सरकार उन्हें आर्थिक सहायता देना शुरू करेगी। पूरी दुनिया में वे अपनी विनाशकारी भू-राजनीतिक और विदेश नीति के कारण अलग-थलग हैं। इस दीर्घ विश्लेषण के लिए आपका धन्यवाद शेखर जी l
Don’t be fooled, ours is a zero sum relationship since 1947. A strong and economically prosperous Pakistan will better fund and arm proxies against India.
Forget the hate, just hear this ruclips.net/video/7D4vNcK6D38/видео.html
@@maxxter90 I don’t hate Pakistan or it’s people. I just respect the force of religious ideology. A policy written on a piece of paper cannot change the ideological hatred inside the minds of 95% of the population.
@@shantanushekharsjunerft9783 common bro.. we are the same... both countries hate each other.. Hindu vs Muslim.. centuries of war and conflict can do that.. If Pak has sent terrorists to India, trust me we've done the same in different wars and conflicts.. in short, there is no winner in this debate. Both countries can benefit more in living with harmony.. We can't afford a two front war with pak and China... Look at China, where they have gone, if we didn't have Pak conflict, we would have been more powerful than China.
@@maxxter90 bhai it’s not personal. I am talking national security of 1.2 billion people. The US never took the foot off Soviet Union’s neck even after it went bankrupt. Compare the difference between 1970 and present Afghanistan to realize that Pakistan did the same to them. China will do the same to us if presented with an opportunity. I will argue that an economically weak Pakistan will be forced to deal with internal problems and will be a negligible threat to our borders.
Can someone please tell the tablet/computer stand being used by Shekhar Gupta.
Firstly , Respect from Pakistani American. You articulate things brilliantly. On this video , forced to write a comment ( Which I usually don’t) , your initial sentences to undermine and ridicule Pakistan in a manner mentioning Not here , others do it , is very disappointing. Please do see it from a non Hindutva or Global Indian prism. For a successful India , a successful region is a must. Please do talk about giving Tempe rights to Kashmiris as per the Indian promises and please focus on regional progress need. Again , respect and Love 💐
Even I felt like he was throwing some shades at the beginning which doesn't justify his journalism...idk why he did that (if you're a regular viewer then you'd know it's very unlike SG sir)
Also, he doesn't view anything from Hindutva lens.
@@jam-ss2jc Thank you 🙏.
@@Theactualstoic Thank you. Moodi is enough to bring that Indian house down.
Thank you for not thinking about Pakistan, please leave us alone and let the region progress. By the way your Army chief just said he wants to attack Pakistan now and oh yes, please tell your patriot news channels to stop doing shows on Pakistan every night since the people don’t care. Oh another thing, please do give Abhinandan our regards.
We Indians will want to have good relations once Pakistan starts taking steps towards becoming a secular democracy like India 🇮🇳
As you mentioned Abhinandan, please give regards to the PAF guy whom your army buried without mention after ISPR General accidentally indicated the "2nd pilot in custody"...
And i find you pakistani guys very cute when the most radicalised jihadist nation founded on the basis of Hindu hatred tries to tell India how to be inclusive and treat it's minorities...
Hard to believe how Modi has changed game of Pakistan. They are on their knees. Before Modi they were fearless and staging Mumbai attack.
First let’s finish them then I will read a few pages of fiction if I get the time.
Shekhar Ji - quick question - is that an MS Surface tab on your table?
shekhar gupta ji why are you wasting time on covering this failed state they are only good enough to be laughed at
Hehe SG has to put Gautama Buddha in background to attract his viewership
What happen to secularism mr Gupta ??
Laying the groundwork, I belive that Imran Khan might be trying for a job at IPL after he is thrown out of his job 😅🤣😂
amazing to hear a south delhi-wala speak about chanakya or even chandragupta!!
Mr. Gupta, thanks for giving a snapshot of the Indian perspective about the NSP of Pakistan. India should be concerned about the classified section of the Pakistani National Security Policy; Pakistanis have are not in the habit of giving India or the USA a walkover in the maters of their national pilers. Kashmir is one of the pillars of its national foreign policy in its relationship with India. It would remain so as long as it's not settled according to their declared and undeclared stance objectives.
First settle people according to 47..
So basically it's a waste of paper essay penned by someone's frenzied feverish dreams with dollops of space given to flights of imagination that will go into the dustbin in a few days time.
@@ghosh.sougata Arrange plebiscite according to the UN resolution of 1948 in IOK, people will choose their destiny and settle.
@@zaffazad4040 according to un resolution 1st pak army will have to leave pok give it to india and then there will be voting, first read the full resolution and then talk
Haha I really hope y'all keep up with your obsession of Kashmir. Indian is arming itself up and forcing you into an arms race, which like the USSR against US you won't survive.
Pakistani collapse is inevitable. Either you enter into an arms race and bankrupt yourself or you don't arm yourself up and get colonised by india. Haha you're doomed and your last hope is China which is also being cornered by global democratic alliance, talk about bad decision making to be in Chinese block 😂😂.
Thanks!