Xi wanted to teach India about imbalance of power. We should take hard budgetary lesson from it

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 560

  • @mrSamirsri
    @mrSamirsri 19 дней назад +52

    Now this was a genuine National Interest edition. Well made.
    Waiting for next week.

    • @RockyBalbova-d3b
      @RockyBalbova-d3b 18 дней назад

      National Intetest editorial ?
      This moron has not read of budgetary provisions of Chinese investment.

  • @sankalp6872
    @sankalp6872 19 дней назад +245

    Credit where credit is due. Unlike the then defence minister, AK Antony, throwing in the towel that too in the Indian parliament, Modi actually stood strong against China. In terms of defense spending, we should also see the absolutes. Tanks and Fighter jets are NOT winning you the war these days. It's the era of UAVs, ARROWs and miniature ammunitions. We need a modern era defense Industry. Modi Govt needs to urgently address this gap. Tax breaks, corridors and favorable policies needed.

    • @JohnAbraham-gh6dz
      @JohnAbraham-gh6dz 19 дней назад +34

      'Modi actually stood strong against China' - That is why china is comfortabily sitting on our land which was taken under his tenure.

    • @Dionysus-m7h
      @Dionysus-m7h 19 дней назад

      ​@@JohnAbraham-gh6dzThe church spoke thus or that abomination Pappu?!😂

    • @abhishek_gupta1990
      @abhishek_gupta1990 19 дней назад +15

      Tbh continue watching the Print for these brilliant comments, sometimes folks commenting are way more smarter and sensible than Print editors themselves 😅

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 19 дней назад

      😂😂😂

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 19 дней назад +14

      ​@@JohnAbraham-gh6dzThis guy is a genius of a special kind.
      He will justify any move by Modi ji.
      He will see absolute terms for Modi era, but what about absolute terms for 2013 incomparison of 2003? UPA was spending way more than 2003.
      Actually he will praise Modi ji for his statement on giving a clean chit to China.
      He is great like Modi ji.

  • @SumitKumar-yw3pb
    @SumitKumar-yw3pb 19 дней назад +65

    It's true that India's military budget as a percentage of GDP has stayed almost flat, but in absolute numbers, it’s increasing every year. There are several reasons behind the flattening of the defense budget:
    1) India heavily relied on Russia for its weapon imports. However, due to the Russia-Ukraine war and Russia's shortage of weaponry, India hasn’t been able to make any major purchases from Russia in the last four years. The last significant deal was for the S-400 missiles. Therefore, if you are not procuring anything worth billions of dollars, why would the defense budget increase?
    2) The new emphasis on 'Make in India' has dramatically altered procurement processes. The Indian armed forces will need some time to adapt to these changes, especially given the strong import lobby within India.
    3) India requires highly advanced technology that it currently lacks, such as 5th-generation fighter jets, deck-based fighters, hypersonic missiles, nuclear submarines, and AIP (Air-Independent Propulsion) submarines. These technologies are challenging to acquire or develop and take time to build domestically.
    4) The import lobby within India’s defense sector is still very influential. For instance, in the procurement of assault rifles, there was no real need to import SIG-716s or AK-203s since we already have solid local options. Similarly, we’re replacing Tata WhAPs with U.S.-made Strykers due to this lobby, often resulting in wasted time and resources.
    Yes, India’s defense budget could be higher; it's not as low as it seems. However, complex issues beyond just budget limitations are also at play here.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад

      If India can go to the Moon, why can't it build its own defence equipment? All we have to do is increase our budget for Defence R&D manifold and not on importing it. Today, even Mulla-run Iran can sell its weapon-carrying Drones to Russia while we still import them. Our MAKE ON INDIA has been a big Jummla. The Sangie Bania country has made our country a trading country rather than a manufacturing country. Causing massive unemployment in India.

    • @mg.f.9023
      @mg.f.9023 19 дней назад +8

      No worries, BJP has invested in Bulldozers.

    • @aaryankumar8770
      @aaryankumar8770 19 дней назад +7

      ​@@mg.f.9023you want to go with partisan politics?
      Okay who created and is using these import lobbies? Congress

    • @aaryankumar8770
      @aaryankumar8770 19 дней назад +4

      By the way Because of Canada
      India wont buy those Strykers 🎉

    • @surajbiradar9827
      @surajbiradar9827 18 дней назад +3

      Yeah nice coping to defend the government
      1) Not just the defense budget as the percentage of GDP has stayed flat or worse declined, as a percentage of government budget it has nosedived. It started declining by 2017 where it was 18 percent then really cratered after 2019 and now it's 13 percent. This is many years before the russo-ukraine war even started. And the meager absolute increase you are talking about is to barely cope with the inflation and accounts to no real increase
      Secondly we don't just buy from Russia, besides the S400 deal was worth 5.4 billion out of a total 21 billion capital expenditure budget so you don't need to increase the budget to accommodate the s400 deal. Your logic is absurd.
      To understand the gravity of situation let's talk in numbers. In 2014-15 FY the armed forces required capital outlay for modernisation of 1,32,597.69 crore but the government allotted just Rs 84,076.95 crore. In 2021 the requirement from armed forces was Rs 1,99,553.44 crore but the govt allotted Rs 1,23,000.22 crore, an amount less than what the Services had sought in 2014. This is all from government's own reply in rajyasabha.
      2) historically if you see domestic equipment have the shortest procurement cycle. Compare LCA MK1A deal to MMRCA, p75i to other domestic ships projects, pinaka etc. And r&d projects have nothing to do with regular defense budget.
      So this is a poor excuse. Defense acquisition procedure 2020 has 6 categories of acquisition and only one or two comes under total domestic development. So what stops other categories?
      Blinded by the incessant need to defend modi you can't even get the facts right which are in open.

  • @sumondutta1101
    @sumondutta1101 19 дней назад +4

    Good journalism.Stands in contrast with the idea that India is turning into a security state.

  • @vijaykumar-vz7xf
    @vijaykumar-vz7xf 19 дней назад +4

    Excellent analysis. Thanks!! Looking forward to next week.

  • @wionporky9937
    @wionporky9937 19 дней назад +17

    Built infrastructure first, without them growth will be organic. You can't expect an exponential growth without an efficient infrastructure.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад

      Reform the bureaucracy before building infrastructure; otherwise, money will be wasted.

    • @wionporky9937
      @wionporky9937 18 дней назад

      @pardeeptandon
      Bureaucratic change is intangible, Indian style of democracy will involve great political determination will not get the support of politicians and the people.
      Because they are nothing to show to the people that something is being done.
      Infrastructure and political reform have to be done at the same time.
      But if there is only one choice. The choice is obvious.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 13 дней назад

      @@wionporky9937 : We are still administrated by the same Bureaucratic structure which the Britishers set up to loot India and make it a Pauper state from the second largest economy we were during n era. We should scrap the entire Bureaucratic system we have and Reform it if we have to progress.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 13 дней назад

      @vanguard123-k3h: This Bureaucratic structure was imposed on us By Brits to loot us still continues. The entire structure needs to be put in dustbin. a New administrative structure has to put in place.
      They make sure no good policy is implemented on the ground.
      The Chinese PSU can sell Diwali lights to us but our Bureaucrats insure that even our private enterprises can not compete with them as our Bureaucracy imposes crazy rules.

  • @Chitralekha-Chakraborty
    @Chitralekha-Chakraborty 19 дней назад +3

    I’m no defense expert, but my understanding of data science says percentage of total GDP should not reflect the spending. We should also consider growth in GDP, spending in different sectors (like pension vs purchasing imported items vs production of local items), income via defense exports, and most importantly leakage due to corruption.

    • @surajbiradar9827
      @surajbiradar9827 18 дней назад +2

      Even if you ignore the GDP percentage the defense budget as percentage of government budget has nosedived since 2018 from 18% to 13% now. And you completely forgot inflation which eats away any meager increase.

  • @shambo-rm8ql
    @shambo-rm8ql 19 дней назад +55

    Future wars will be fought by drones as is already evident from Ukraine war and Israel/Iran war. India needs to urgently learn from Ukraine war and stop investing in
    1. Aircraft careers (too expensive for our budget, 2 we have are enough). Aircraft careers have no defense against hypersonic missiles and we have Andaman and Laksdeep as unsinkable aircraft carriers, building air strip on each and every island of Andaman and Laksdeep will be less expensive than an aircraft carrier
    And start investing in
    1. Drones, FPV, Suicide drones, including terrain mapping AI enabled drones (lots of them). Marine drones.
    2. Self propelled artillery as they are less susceptible to drone attacks due to their fast moving capability.
    3. MANPADS, MANPATS (Perfect to stop Chinese aggression in Himalayas and gruella warfare against better armed Chinese military)
    4. Missiles (we have them and need to ramp up the production and build more production capabilities, ramp in the private sector). We need hundreds of thousands of SAM's and saturate North East with them.
    5. Most important Gepard type self-propelled anti-aircraft anti-drone gun (only practical defense against drones including AI drones) . We need at least 50,000 of them manufactured in India and deployed all across the border to stop surveillance drones, smuggling drones and also the armed drones in case of war against China
    6. Submarines, a lot of them. They are stealth killers, if we have 500 of them, no navy will dare to challenge us in Indian Ocean. Quality is not as important as quantity when it comes to Submarines. We don't need so many nuclear submarines, we need a lot of ordinary submarines to block Malacca strait and Andaman sea

    • @badbad-cat
      @badbad-cat 19 дней назад

      Everything has its importance. And in war, all these machines will get destroyed and it's normal. Stop panicking after a CNN BBC propaganda session

    • @Pain-zd5uo
      @Pain-zd5uo 19 дней назад +3

      Wdym "stop investing in". Did you mean "start investing in*"?

    • @siddharthgoyal4008
      @siddharthgoyal4008 19 дней назад +7

      Main thing is submarine vs aircraft carrier is one if defensive while other is an offensive weapon. You cannot project power with submarines, india sees itself as a power projector in IOR.

    • @AbhayPeshin
      @AbhayPeshin 19 дней назад

      ​@@siddharthgoyal4008 you can project power by torpedoing any ship you want to withdraw a submarine, if India gets a 100 subs we can dominate all ocean

    • @martinvanburen4578
      @martinvanburen4578 19 дней назад +5

      that is a bizarre take...Aircraft carrier project power in the seas. A war with China would involve shipping lanes and a carrier is great for that as well as launching multiprong attacks. Drones are great but you need to reach the attack points and a carrier can achieve that from the sea.

  • @chaitanyadeshpande6060
    @chaitanyadeshpande6060 19 дней назад +50

    SG sir gets abused by both modi and congress fans. A true proof of un biased journalism😂😂

    • @mg.f.9023
      @mg.f.9023 19 дней назад +5

      SG has the courage to expose the truth so that the country can rectify any shortfalls. Unlike the main stream media who is only doing wah wah of the ruling party.

    • @ROHIT690THAKUR
      @ROHIT690THAKUR 19 дней назад +1

      If I've to guess it's day,
      By Modi fans coz he's historically been a reporter fromCongress camp.
      Now from Congress fans maybe coz he doesn't seem to be supporting Congress anymore.

    • @scbqpl
      @scbqpl 18 дней назад +3

      When politicians can play all sides.
      SG mein kyun piche rahon.. sab ko Chuna lagane mein!

    • @Ninjashank
      @Ninjashank 18 дней назад +1

      @@mg.f.9023 The same SG who doesn't want to call a failed son of an ex pm a loser, was happy to call the haryana CM a 'loser' some 10 times that too with absolute disdain, "before" the haryana election. After the eggs on his face and the omlette were eaten, he had nothing good to say about the winner :)

    • @abhilash9918
      @abhilash9918 18 дней назад +2

      Bruh this coupta was writing coup stories in 2011, 12.
      He was accusing gen VK Singh chief of the Indian army.
      Routine military exercise was termed as a coup attempt by sekhar coupta.
      Allegedly he was doing all this on the behalf of p Chidambaram, and the target was army chief.

  • @jdsingh9283
    @jdsingh9283 19 дней назад +3

    This is much needed and an excellent piece , however is anyone in south block listening ?

  • @sridharseetharaman7611
    @sridharseetharaman7611 19 дней назад +6

    Well prepared posture is a must for peace at the borders

  • @Drganguli
    @Drganguli 19 дней назад +1

    Good to get lessons every now and then about the need for economic and military power

  • @shantanu_d
    @shantanu_d 19 дней назад +1

    Excellent point which we all seem to miss. Thank You Shekhar.

  • @tapemaj
    @tapemaj 19 дней назад +3

    Interesting - Sunday morning watch here in London .

  • @rajx7120
    @rajx7120 19 дней назад +52

    India needs to implement economic reforms, asap to raise GDP growth rate from 7% (new Hindu rate, as you say), to 10%. The fact that we haven't developed political concensus on these, is also used by China to denounce the idea of democracy, which they blame as the reason for India being left behind. Either political parties need to come together, or voters have to get out of their biases, to encourage the parties they support, to support the reforms. In cases, like these, people and parties have to put national interests over immediate power games, and blame games. I don't know how they will achieve it, but creative politics is needed, whosoever it maybe from.

    • @hrp4566
      @hrp4566 19 дней назад +3

      It will be achievement if we can maintain 7% for 20 years which will pull GDP to 15 trillion which is good.

    • @MegaAshfire
      @MegaAshfire 19 дней назад +15

      Why 10? Not 15? And Hindu growth rate is a racist term. Don’t be stupid like Nehru. The opposition can’t shut up over even small issues forget the things we need for 10% growth.

    • @srinivasvyasarao
      @srinivasvyasarao 19 дней назад +6

      Consensus on an important issue in WaQF bill itself is not happening to talk of defence is too premature.

    • @randomish
      @randomish 19 дней назад +1

      just put emergency with consensus

    • @sankalp6872
      @sankalp6872 19 дней назад +17

      @@rajx7120 Be careful what you wish for. India is the world's fastest growing large economy. That means 7% is more than decent in the current era where most countries are struggling with budget controls. If we artificially try to heat up the economy, we may end up with uncontrollable inflation. The best approach is to move in a clandestine manner and introduce reforms in a phased manner to prevent shocks.

  • @anveshak9318
    @anveshak9318 19 дней назад +13

    Usually I am a trenchant critic of Shekhar Gupta but this is one of the few episodes where I wholeheartedly agree with him.
    Thanks for your perspective

    • @2010anilshukla
      @2010anilshukla 19 дней назад +1

      Great - how will you describe yourself.

  • @sahilchander3266
    @sahilchander3266 18 дней назад

    Sir, you and your team are just Amazing.. What Analysis , one of the best Cut the Clutter videos.. I come from a Defence background and I was amazed with the actual data points you highlighted.. Hats off..

  • @user-pn2ew8fe8i
    @user-pn2ew8fe8i 19 дней назад +10

    Modiji and his Babus have not completely stoped trade with China

    • @srajalbansal7112
      @srajalbansal7112 19 дней назад +13

      Even Superpower USA can't do that..

    • @asheeshbathre4360
      @asheeshbathre4360 19 дней назад +3

      Wto ka name suna hh

    • @isleephungry
      @isleephungry 18 дней назад +2

      Completely stoped trade withchina it would be a disaster for India.😂

  • @ajayrawat-bf9pc
    @ajayrawat-bf9pc 17 дней назад +3

    Indian power differential with China will peak around 2030 and will remain static after that. PLA will field 1000 5 gen fighters by 2035, so will Pakistan. By sheer timelines we are screwed whether MRFA, SSN or Conventional subs, tankers, Awaacs. So play it nice, stay vigilant and balalnce externally. Develop your own defence industry and spend on research.

  • @sajithomas2158
    @sajithomas2158 17 дней назад +1

    Best way to avoid a war is to prepare well for one.

  • @ashokrazdan7358
    @ashokrazdan7358 19 дней назад +1

    Excellent analysis. Vintage Shakhar Gupta

  • @sayantan19911
    @sayantan19911 19 дней назад

    Extremely important topic and great data points. There is no way India can afford to diminish its defence spending to expose itself even to a tiny vulnerable. Large scale wars might not happen in foreseeable future, however we should not let adversaries poke here and there and have fun. Economically we are now enough capable to upgrade our forces.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад

      More spending on defence R & D is required.

  • @dyoutuber
    @dyoutuber 18 дней назад +1

    Master in finding negative in positive . 😂

  • @adityagupta101
    @adityagupta101 19 дней назад +15

    Disagree with Mr. Gupta on one point - the latest India-Tibet border standoff is not due to capability gaps or capacity gaps. Its a gap in intention - CCP is clear that they want Kashmiri to be split between China and Pakistan are only moving towards that aim. What do we want? What steps are we taking? Whis aren't we taking proactive steps to reclaim our territory... Why are peace deals only to be followed by us and not the other?

    • @parvadhami980
      @parvadhami980 19 дней назад

      Peace deals followed by India
      Because India's economy is 5x less than India

    • @sureshnaidu201
      @sureshnaidu201 18 дней назад

      Why china need to follow peace deals when they think ( and India knows they are...) they are way ahead of india

    • @surajbiradar9827
      @surajbiradar9827 18 дней назад +2

      Intention without capabilities is just hollow shenanigans.

    • @kartheekvijay2250
      @kartheekvijay2250 18 дней назад

      india is claiming chinese areas conquered by Brits

    • @ajayrawat-bf9pc
      @ajayrawat-bf9pc 17 дней назад +1

      I have intention to take your jet aircraft but lack capability. 😂
      jokes apart,
      It's capability which mattes and cannot change overnight, intentions change overnight. It takes decades building airforce and a century building the Navy.
      Sir, you are a green horn don't question veterans like SG. Enjoy. 🎉

  • @aashishskumar5379
    @aashishskumar5379 18 дней назад

    Great Information sharing Sir!!

  • @pmm7268
    @pmm7268 18 дней назад +2

    Defence expenditure during congress rule was only to tge extent of funding requirement of the firangi family. Congress party was a corrupt version of colonial enemy that ruled india!
    They had no national interest. Like colonialists and like current Canada the party was turing india's diversity as a means to exploit public sentiments by their caste -relogious sectarian politics making it appear 'secularism'.
    Had congress been in power, india would have become starkly poor, only this famiky would have become richer... Would not have let indian capital investment perform unless the family was funded.
    Ememy rule continued through congress government. As colonialists. They too used divide & rule as a strategy! By wisdom of indian citizens they have not come to power! Only sectarians and casteists vote for them now!

  • @siddhubabaji
    @siddhubabaji 19 дней назад +6

    Why is there always the philosophy of wishing away the problems so evident in these matters with us, no matter how hard we may want the Chinese to be the nice and decent neighbour they are our biggest competitors at the least and any complacency in relation to them will prove really costly in the coming times.

  • @krishnaprasadsannidhi8288
    @krishnaprasadsannidhi8288 19 дней назад +32

    It's a victory of every Indian citizen under the able leadership of Modi ji.
    Happy to see The Print has recognized Modi's contribution. Jai Hind!🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @vizmouli
      @vizmouli 19 дней назад

      Feku moron only cost us more bcoz of his laal ankh. Chineese forced a lot of resources to be moved to defence which could have been used for development. We still are no match for china

    • @Addlife2days
      @Addlife2days 19 дней назад +1

      Grudging admission 😂

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 19 дней назад +6

      @@krishnaprasadsannidhi8288 Yeah, no other PM has ever gave clean chit to China. Modi ji has done that great job.
      Also, the defence spending is least under him. He has done a great job here too.

    • @loveinthelandfill1124
      @loveinthelandfill1124 19 дней назад +4

      I will only believe this agreement has been "great for us" once I hear our great PM actually spill the details in the parliament. For now let's not prematurely celebrate.

    • @surajbiradar9827
      @surajbiradar9827 18 дней назад +2

      Ok Mr. BJP spokesperson

  • @parichaytyagi5471
    @parichaytyagi5471 19 дней назад +45

    Modi Government's road and infrastructure building paid off

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 19 дней назад +4

      Haan, Chin to road hi dekh ke wapas gaya hai...😂😂

    • @mg.f.9023
      @mg.f.9023 19 дней назад

      Chinese phones have flooded India. Chinese need not come over.

    • @vamsikrishna3855
      @vamsikrishna3855 18 дней назад

      @@BharatThatIsIndiaabe chutiye.. infra development means .. large deployments are possible.

  • @ArkoProvoMukherjee
    @ArkoProvoMukherjee 19 дней назад +1

    Thanks!

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  17 дней назад

      Dear Arko, thank you for your support.

  • @akaj188
    @akaj188 14 дней назад +2

    2020 Chinese invasion had roots in 2019 moves by India in Ladakh . Home Minister Amit Shah declared in the Lok Sabha that Aksai Chin was also Indian territory.
    "Article 370 gave India only a limited say in the affairs of Jammu and Kashmir , including Ladakh , which suited both China and Pakistan .
    China was always a player in the so called Kashmir dispute overtly only between India and Pakistan. China wanted Ladakh to link up with Pakistan and Shaksgam valley . State Govt of Jammu and Kashmir , including Ladakh , was sympathetic to Pakistan ‘s and ultimately to China ‘s interests , especially , in Ladakh. Example Late Sheikh Abdullah refused to allow His Holiness The Dalai Lama and his followers to settle in Ladakh when they took refuge in India . Ladakh was most suitable for Tibetans both from climate and cultural points of views.
    India ‘s direct control over both Kashmir and Ladakh has put an end to the China - Pakistani collusion .

    • @tapschaudhuri
      @tapschaudhuri 13 дней назад +1

      Classic comment 👌 👌👌

    • @akaj188
      @akaj188 12 дней назад

      @@tapschaudhuri Thanks a lot.

  • @Jewishpatriot1
    @Jewishpatriot1 19 дней назад +2

    I agree sir!

  • @nawalkishore4846
    @nawalkishore4846 19 дней назад +1

    You say brilliant work done by indian army and engineers. You are saying this-shocking. A person like you saying this unbelievable !!!!! At core you can't change, no change of heart

  • @joshua_ch
    @joshua_ch 19 дней назад +2

    This is a very good episode and 2.5% is very doable from 2027-28, after the fiscal deficit gets to below 4%. I would just add a minor quibble, there should be some guarantees on increasing domestic arms procurement and research spending as part of any increases.

  • @whaddoiknow6519
    @whaddoiknow6519 19 дней назад +2

    A much better presentation by Shekhar Gupta with the endless self-referencing, useless comments on phraseology, and the constant use of the Thesauraus to tell the unwashed masses like us what he means, although even here on more than once instance, he could not help saying that zero-point-two percent was the same as point-two-zero percent.

  • @Canadamurali
    @Canadamurali 17 дней назад

    Excellent report

  • @prakashraghunathan2685
    @prakashraghunathan2685 18 дней назад

    Thank you shekar sir for bringing the facts.india should reduce the tax an bring more money to middleclass consumers .More economic reform is necessary for even 7.2 of GDP.Mprivitasation of defencePSU.

  • @viralvieralmehta8613
    @viralvieralmehta8613 19 дней назад

    This is good analysis today . Very good . 👍

  • @jagan.g
    @jagan.g 19 дней назад +6

    Modi shown the spine by mirror deployment of defence forces on the border post galwan clashes for the last five years. Banning Chinese Apps like Tick Tock and suspended the direct Air connectivity to china and putting investment restrictions and going for faster development of border infrastructure , QUAD meeeting etc, forced china to blink first and back off. Our FM K.jayashanker never minced words in telling the world about Chinese aggression on the border in international forums. Full credit to our PM and FM.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад

      He banned Tick Tock but tripled our trade deficit with China. Within a few months, direct flights with China will start. In the last three years, Chinese investments in India have increased rather than reduced.
      America has put QUAD on the back burner, replaced India with the Philippines, and formed a new grouping to contain Chinese influence in the region.
      After America snubbed our Sangie government on the Khalistan issue, we went to China with our tails between our legs. We agreed to a larger trade deficit, exporting our jobs to China.

    • @mg.f.9023
      @mg.f.9023 19 дней назад +3

      PM said no one has entered. FM has said China are stronger.

  • @anishkumar0070
    @anishkumar0070 19 дней назад +2

    Why don't you work on your microphone? Other RUclips channels have so much clear and louder voice. I have skipped past few videos due to bad audio.

    • @wealthInfinity1
      @wealthInfinity1 19 дней назад +1

      Time for you to change to your headphones

  • @polestar5517
    @polestar5517 19 дней назад +3

    Thanks Shekhar. Modi is a Machiavellian Centaur. Both Angel and Beast in one.

  • @krishnachary1462
    @krishnachary1462 19 дней назад

    Improving the morality and commitment among armed forces is an essential infusion than just increasing the military budget. That is the key investment from Modi and his government.

  • @shinedas2264
    @shinedas2264 19 дней назад

    The percentage is down because the total budget amount is very much more than before.

  • @Srini023
    @Srini023 19 дней назад

    Awesome analysis.

  • @BharatThatIsIndia
    @BharatThatIsIndia 19 дней назад +4

    6:25 So Modi ji has gone back on defence spending promises like his promises!!!
    Defence spending is 13%, less than UPA2 worst Year i.e. 2013.

    • @SDFNI3894YR
      @SDFNI3894YR 17 дней назад +1

      from where you got this info? in 2013 it was 240,000 crore. now it's 671,932 crores. only the ratio compared to gdp has come down. which is sensible.

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 17 дней назад

      @SDFNI3894YR Do you know something called maths?
      Calculate the percentage.
      GDP, Growth, Expenditure, etc all are calculated like that.

    • @GelloMello-j9z
      @GelloMello-j9z 17 дней назад

      @@BharatThatIsIndia he did the math you clown

    • @tapschaudhuri
      @tapschaudhuri 13 дней назад

      ​@@BharatThatIsIndiachew tia

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 12 дней назад

      @tapschaudhuri Modi Ji ko aisa mat bolo. PM hai wo. Chew tia kahe bol rahe ho?

  • @arijitdakshi820
    @arijitdakshi820 19 дней назад +7

    Credits are also due to the USA 🇺🇸 for the BECA Agreement to provide realtime precision mass targeting data from its considerable space assets 🌌🚀(space-based GMTI/AMTI) to jointly give a fait-accompli to China and re-establish deterrence and détente.
    Its an open question whether India has established the double détente with both America and China.
    .

  • @dipunatatajan2448
    @dipunatatajan2448 17 дней назад

    well said

  • @sknew5738
    @sknew5738 19 дней назад +2

    Looks like china wanted to know how India will behave if yhey start thr invasion.. Chinese have learnt some lesson so next time they will be more prepared so Indian side to upgrade themselves in big way when Chinese return back in 2-3 Years

  • @mr.whostheboss9884
    @mr.whostheboss9884 19 дней назад

    Great

  • @rensoyphil
    @rensoyphil 19 дней назад +9

    We have to create a chain of premium research institutions, an ecosystem linked to the existing high ranking universities to carry forward research and development of hi-tech crore technologies in diversified fields in order to gain technology related autonomy & self reliance, enhanced comprehensive national capabilities and ultimately for national progress.
    Thomas L Friedman's comments on the path to progress of India are memorable in this context.
    There is a big gap in R&D spending in India, compared to the other advanced countries like America, China and western European countries .
    We have to increase the budgetary allocations for research projects for the sustenance. Recently some policy improvements are visible in this regard.
    - Philip from Kerala.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад

      You are 100 % right.

    • @dineshpratapupadhyay6583
      @dineshpratapupadhyay6583 16 дней назад

      I agree.
      We need to invest more in education and health.
      Top class infrastructure is needed , too.
      Hence the need to cut "wasteful" defence budget.

  • @Muthurasu9
    @Muthurasu9 18 дней назад

    One simple fact the de-hyphenated journalism swallowed is - India's defense budget has more than doubled in the last 10 years, increasing from Rs 2.53 lakh crores in 2013-14 to Rs 6.22 lakh crores in 2024-25.
    On a growing denominator, the quotient is likely to drop.

  • @ShivPratapSinghgurgaon
    @ShivPratapSinghgurgaon 18 дней назад

    Indians should focus on strenthing economy the way china did without shouting we are superpower. World will know when we become superpower at that time nobody will need to shout.
    Work hard and don’t ruin soft power as well as future prospects

  • @dineshpratapupadhyay6583
    @dineshpratapupadhyay6583 16 дней назад

    There is a greater need to spend more on education (including setting up top notch research institutes), health and world class infrastructure (for rapid economic growth) than on defence budget.
    Hence the reduction in the share of government budget.

  • @naturemeditation3751
    @naturemeditation3751 19 дней назад +1

    Bet the best eager student to learn first and fast is shekar gupta 😂😂😂😂

  • @Star-ds4sd
    @Star-ds4sd 19 дней назад +8

    Reducing The Army Man Power Strength Directly by 2% of All Regiments ( Sikh to Madras to Gurkhas ) and Using That Resources for Drones Etc

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад +2

      Add to that a Bania & Marwati regiment from Gujarat.

    • @ravibasera1
      @ravibasera1 19 дней назад +3

      ​@@pardeeptandon 😂, funny but true

    • @sureshnaidu201
      @sureshnaidu201 18 дней назад

      ​@@pardeeptandon😂

    • @isleephungry
      @isleephungry 18 дней назад

      Trying to defeat drone overlords with drones is a foolish ideal😂

  • @ravinderjitsinghbajwa8584
    @ravinderjitsinghbajwa8584 18 дней назад

    Very good analysis.

  • @govindapoduvalkg2889
    @govindapoduvalkg2889 19 дней назад +11

    Defence experts are of the view that China does not have any war experience worthwhile for the last 2000 years, their war with Russia ended in defeat and the one with Japan also ended in defeat. Their war with Vietnam also did not show any result. Moreover their army consists of conscripted soldiers. But Indian army is battlehardened with participation in world wars one and two. Just to bring to notice of China lovers

    • @ranjitkamath2417
      @ranjitkamath2417 19 дней назад +5

      Good Point, But they defeated us in 1962

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 19 дней назад +1

      India's defense experts are so interesting...

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 19 дней назад +2

      The Indian army is the worst army among all China's opponents. China's war of resistance against Japan lasted 14 years, the Chinese civil war lasted 4 years, the Korean War lasted 3 years, China's self-defense counterattack against Vietnam lasted 2 months, and China's border war with Vietnam lasted 10 years. India's understanding of "war" is too narrow. We Chinese believe that India has never experienced a real war. In 1962, in the eyes of the Chinese, it was not a war, it was just an armed conflict between China and India. In 1962, the short armed conflict of only 32 days continued India's nightmare for decades. What makes the Chinese feel funny is that a border conflict has turned India into a "Battle for the Defense of the Capital of New Delhi".

    • @royvirafayet6687
      @royvirafayet6687 19 дней назад

      Good luck fighting with your 100 year old veterans with WW2 tactics

    • @vedantjadhav7505
      @vedantjadhav7505 19 дней назад

      ​@@mingmuyiyang8615CCP BOT

  • @insearchof9090
    @insearchof9090 19 дней назад

    Yes sir.

  • @karnakarna4490
    @karnakarna4490 18 дней назад

    Narrative started in guise of patriotism!!

  • @sureshnaidu201
    @sureshnaidu201 18 дней назад +1

    I suppose either indian communist or chinese wolf warrior commenting in this thread

  • @pardeeptandon
    @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад +7

    Rather than increasing the defence budget. We should increase our Budget on R & D of defence equipment. But our Sangie Bania government is more interested in buying defence equipment abroad than manufacturing it in-house.

    • @polstarnavigator
      @polstarnavigator 19 дней назад +3

      You have to be seriously biased to say something like this. No govt has done so much for defence manufacturing as this govt.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад +2

      @@polstarnavigator@polstarnavigator: The fact is that the contribution of manufacturing to our economy has decreased in the last decade. We still import weapons carrying Drowns when Mulla Iran & turkey can export them to Russia. Please do not get carried away by the false propaganda of our Sanghi Media.

    • @may4u310
      @may4u310 16 дней назад

      ​@pardeeptandon True, it was visionary Nehru who set up Military Industrial Complex in India then 2014 happened and all shifted to west.

    • @polstarnavigator
      @polstarnavigator 16 дней назад

      @@may4u310 what Nehru got to do with it? Modi built industries but Nehru built this country. We can respect both. If you can't see it, you too are biased.

  • @arkabanerjee1627
    @arkabanerjee1627 19 дней назад

    Excellent 😊

  • @garryunplugged
    @garryunplugged 18 дней назад

    A Comprehensive Analysis of Fact Checking: Shekhar, I appreciate your thorough analysis of the situation, highlighting various key points.

  • @ardeshirmehr5221
    @ardeshirmehr5221 18 дней назад

    Mutual fund ka advertisement next level ka tha

  • @sharanbansal1897
    @sharanbansal1897 18 дней назад

    Shekhar ji , although there is merit in the argument that defence spending should go up as a PERCENTAGE of GDP , I wish you had also given a flavour of how much the GDP itself is going up and by virtue of the same , defence spending is actually UP not DOWN in absolute terms .

  • @notforclapsnt8631
    @notforclapsnt8631 18 дней назад +1

    Sekhar Gupta is reporting as if he is reporting for China or Pak government

  • @sentiyapanglemtur8895
    @sentiyapanglemtur8895 18 дней назад

    The print should launch a Hindi language channel to broaden it's viewers. "Unbiased journalism."

  • @rajpachori
    @rajpachori 18 дней назад

    When we talk about defence expenditure, we should include 1000s of crores expenditure by private players in R&D after privatisation of the sector.

  • @viplav2562
    @viplav2562 19 дней назад +6

    1.)We are going to lose in this decade as well. China has already become an economic powerhouse, military behemoth and global leader in many critical technologies.
    2.) Its very painful to see that our divisive politics, internal division and lack of foresight for long term economic and strategic planning has shattered our hopes always
    3.)This border tension will remain until we are able to stand against china on equal footing in all areas
    4.)They don’t consider us threat and we are a poor and failed state in their eyes which can be used as a pawn by USA against them....

  • @gautamgothia1420
    @gautamgothia1420 19 дней назад

    Defence budget should be of atleast 2.5% of Nominal GDP. If there's shortage of funds, cut down on the unnecessary expenses like free Ration

  • @user-pn2ew8fe8i
    @user-pn2ew8fe8i 19 дней назад +9

    Blame it on Congress

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia 19 дней назад +2

      No no. On Nehru.
      Rajiv Gandhi dealt with China. He spent 4+% of the budget on defence. But he was weak.
      Modi ji gave a clean chit to China, decreased defence budget to record low, but he is 56 inch wala.
      They are living in the 1984 Orwell world.

    • @vamsikrishna3855
      @vamsikrishna3855 18 дней назад

      @@BharatThatIsIndiapaid pooper he always did the bofors scam

  • @TheKsagnihotri
    @TheKsagnihotri 12 дней назад

    First time some good reporting, along with typical congress booting

  • @zigzagzog100
    @zigzagzog100 19 дней назад

    After last disastrous CTC on PIA this topic was a good choice...

  • @nilwa4190
    @nilwa4190 19 дней назад +8

    We dont need to match with China's millitary. We just need to reach break even point.

    • @SDFNI3894YR
      @SDFNI3894YR 17 дней назад +1

      what is the break even point here?

  • @rakeshjinsi9279
    @rakeshjinsi9279 18 дней назад

    Suggest keep your videos both CTC and In National Interest just like this.Compact, brief and communicate information on the topic in a matter of fact manner.

  • @supercool1251
    @supercool1251 19 дней назад

    Modi is the modern day Nehru.. Nation builder.. Jai Modiji

  • @ManOfSteel1
    @ManOfSteel1 19 дней назад +2

    mody chini bhai bhai. desh gaya bhaad me.

    • @rd3499
      @rd3499 19 дней назад

      Papu chini bhai bhai aksai chin tibet gaya china ka pass

  • @nagbalkur1365
    @nagbalkur1365 19 дней назад +4

    argument for increasing defense expenditure as percentage of GDP is good. However, you ignored two factors while making the case with regard to China
    1) China's huge problem is Taiwan, South China Sea, which is a much much bigger issue than fighting for few KM of land in Himalayas, when it's strategic goal of what it needs was accomplished in 1950s with capture of Aksai Chin in Eastern Ladakh.
    2) Size ONLY matters to an extent. Otherwise, how do you explain what America, and China Experienced with Vietnam, a very small poor country in 1970s when Vietnamese stood up to both US and their big northern neighbor China in 1979 ?
    I think you need to do SOME real home work on how small determined countries like Vietnam handled bigger powers.
    3) It's unlikely Pakistan's economic situation will improve in next 5 years and with that it's unlikely it'll start a new mis-adventure. Pakistan does that ONLY when it's economy is humming.

    • @martinvanburen4578
      @martinvanburen4578 19 дней назад +1

      "Size ONLY matters to an extent. Otherwise, how do you explain what America, and China Experienced with Vietnam, a very small poor country in 1970s when Vietnamese stood up to both US and their big northern neighbor China in 1979 "
      yeah with Chinese help. People always leave out context. Vietnam was civil war with proxy wars occurring at the same time.
      India cannot expect the US to jump in and help in a war or skirmish with China. Size matters but what matters more is technology, information, military readiness, soldiers and good generals.

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 19 дней назад

      ​@@martinvanburen4578Vietnam's economy was set back 30 years after the war with China.. China's aim is to punish Vietnam provoking Chinese border villages. PLA retreated after knowing the damage was done to Vietnam. Takes them years even till now they haven't fully recovered from the economy difficulties. 😂

    • @martinvanburen4578
      @martinvanburen4578 19 дней назад

      @@LimWJ2023 The bombing from America and sanctions was not a factor? The PLA helped fight the Americans that is why America lost. That is the point.

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 18 дней назад

      @@martinvanburen4578 Without PLA advisor going to Vietnam to teach them how to fight guerilla warfare.. veits has no chance of winning the Americans.. PLA had experienced fighting US in the Korean war..and had created many tactics againest US firepower.. China and Russia were supporting Vietnam in the fight againest US. US sanctions not effective againest Vietnam. They were rebuilding with the help of Russia and China.. till the vietnamese troops starts to provoke the Chinese by attacking and invading Chinese village to expand their territories that spark the war with china. China sent their PLA to repel the vietnamese troops back and penetrate further inflicting more damage and loses to the viet's. Destroying the rebuild infrasturture and economy factories, shops, equipment and farms before been recalled back. That is the devastating blow. US war with Vietnam did not fulfill any military or political goals.. they planned to defeat the communist in Vietnam within short period and set up a democratic puppet government but ended up with high casualties as US got dragged into the mud of war with Russia and Chinese backing up the vietnamese. It was a humiliating retreat for the US.

    • @LimWJ2023
      @LimWJ2023 18 дней назад

      @@martinvanburen4578 Sanctions aren't everything.. Chinese who are their neighbours and ally who can help them then after the US retreat.. but Vietnam provoke china at the border. Even SEA countries were worried of Vietnam's aggression.. china's border war on Vietnam are a relieve to SEA countries then. Vietnamese isolate itself the moment they provoke china.. no aid to them and from the world.. till they gain trust from the region.

  • @nirmalbhel3231
    @nirmalbhel3231 19 дней назад +4

    Very nice to see The Print praising BJP & MODI

    • @HarmanHundal01
      @HarmanHundal01 19 дней назад +1

      You don’t seem equally excited when the 56 inch tongue is criticised by the Print.

  • @prakhargupta2081
    @prakhargupta2081 19 дней назад +2

    Sg sitting on the table is gangster

  • @kaustavdey9354
    @kaustavdey9354 19 дней назад

    Dear Sir,
    I watch your podcast since i differ with your views.
    My points why not to spend money in Defence
    1.US has the highest defence budget but hardly 20 percent people even in US and EU believe .Recently in EU, most of the EU nations either absented or voted against against EU directive to put Tariffs agains a country who produce EV
    2.Its time, we would like to grow like our neighbour.
    Simply following their footsteps
    3.The ukrain issue is going to be a deciding factor .They know it including Mr Modi.
    He , is still in power because if Rusia.Else the indian economy could have gone for a toss.
    I could go on.
    Nr Putin ( Not like Gorge Kenon), has proved a point ,
    With 18000 sanctions , a country can survive.
    India can't fight a war with china for 30 days.
    They are a Suoer power.
    Hope, Sir , u get into it.

  • @himanshusingh0876
    @himanshusingh0876 19 дней назад +1

    India defence expenditure should be atleast 4-5% of total GDP coz we have to confront one hostile enemy on two front China on east & west.

    • @rahulmig35
      @rahulmig35 18 дней назад

      And one outside our immediate borders

  • @00919785210001
    @00919785210001 16 дней назад +1

    however right or wrong, Why entertain lapdogs from kennels of DYNASTY...?
    they need not be relied upon. Period

  • @yorisingrango9837
    @yorisingrango9837 19 дней назад

    Good episode. But Budget and finance are just the first part of the problem. Focus should also be on how procurement can be fast tracked. We know most procurement are just stuck for decades in endless cycle of trials and negotiations and re trials.

  • @dennisvazquez2140
    @dennisvazquez2140 17 дней назад

    Engage, engage, engage, engage, engage, engage in adventurism. Engage, engage, engage, engage, engage, engage in adventurism. You know the USA, Pakistan and China have but you don't know India?

  • @prasannadhopate8513
    @prasannadhopate8513 19 дней назад

    Capex in Building of infrastructure in Ladakh & Arunachal should also be considered as a part of defence budget.

  • @rahulmig35
    @rahulmig35 18 дней назад

    I also think the Chinese could start another stand off sooner than later

  • @manivannanchokkalingam8251
    @manivannanchokkalingam8251 19 дней назад +8

    even if you put up the money 💰,no guarantee the arms will come from the west. only way out is build whatever you can in india 🇮🇳. only the navy has done a great job 👍 while the army & air force have let us down.

    • @pardeeptandon
      @pardeeptandon 19 дней назад +2

      To be self-sufficient in arms, we have to build our R&D capacities. In the last decade, our Make in India project has even been a disaster. Today, Mulla Iran and Turkey can export weapon carrying Drowns to Russia while we are still importing them.

  • @jawaharlalbansal1062
    @jawaharlalbansal1062 10 дней назад

    China taught Nehru a lesson in 1962,which congress did not forget till 2014 and surrender Aksai chin and part of Ladakh to china and committed to china to not make any infrastructure an LAC,till china over take whole of Ladakh and Siachen,where a blade of grass never grows

  • @spacexfanclub6529
    @spacexfanclub6529 19 дней назад +1

    I think that the Ukraine (although slowly losing) being able to inflict so heavy losses against Russia despite the huge parity between the two , not to mention one of them is not even a nuclear power will force anyone to think several times . India on its part must learn & adapt all the lessons coming out of the 2 current ongoing wars... especially the adaptation of AI drones & developing & deploying hypersonic missiles & more asymmetric means of war. And ofcourse on top of that all increasing GDP share of defence spending as you pointed out must be done but aimed towards R&D & indegenisation.
    Let's get Saffrin engine 100% ToT from France , they are willing to offer us that & then we will be able to produce as many fighter jets as possible.

    • @rahulmig35
      @rahulmig35 18 дней назад

      Ukraine alone is not fighting. It is the entire nato force

  • @durgeshray8228
    @durgeshray8228 19 дней назад

    At last Guptaji says something positive about BJP govt.

  • @spacexfanclub6529
    @spacexfanclub6529 19 дней назад

    The 31 MQ9 Drones which India has bought from US will significantly boost our Army Airforce & Navy's capabilities. Can't wait for your next week's episode.

    • @rahulmig35
      @rahulmig35 18 дней назад

      Mq9 can't really change a lot with the Chinese. The houthi conflict has shown the limitations of very expensive drones

    • @rahulmig35
      @rahulmig35 18 дней назад

      They could be useful for reconaissance on the Pakistani side or limited maritime peace time role

  • @HimanshuSharma-uh3np
    @HimanshuSharma-uh3np 19 дней назад +32

    Where the hell is the money going? The percentage of budget allocated to defence is down, the railways don't have the budget, the education sector is in shambles due to budgetary constraints and whichever sector you take a look at there is an issue of budget constraints, meanwhile GST collections are touching record highs. Tf is going on?

    • @SkpalTube
      @SkpalTube 19 дней назад +13

      Probably goes to the party fund to pay for rallies and advertisement.

    • @SkpalTube
      @SkpalTube 19 дней назад +2

      Probably goes to the party fund to pay for rallies and advertisement.

    • @Godfearing-Atheist
      @Godfearing-Atheist 19 дней назад +2

      Party has separate funding thanks to electoral bonds

    • @adm7038
      @adm7038 19 дней назад +26

      Subsidies of all kinds, pensions and services for retired government employees, debt repayments, border infrastructure …

    • @ij130291
      @ij130291 19 дней назад +26

      Welfare schemes. We Indians want to get everything free, contribute minimal and loot whenever possible 😅

  • @HumanFirst001
    @HumanFirst001 18 дней назад

    RaGa Fans hit like ❤❤❤
    Only way to bring peace in South Asia 😅
    Gandhi Vision 🎉

  • @ajqkit7gt
    @ajqkit7gt 9 дней назад

    India's defense budget doesn't come from GDP. It comes from tax revenue (and may be debt but debt and tax revenues are ultimately linked. Debt has to be repaid using tax revenue). All these suggestions like using another 0.2% of GDP for defense looks good only on paper. India's tax-to-gdp ratio is still pretty low. Lot of money is getting spent on freebies leaving less for development and everything else. Center gets to spend roughly 40% of total govt spend. Rest 60% is spent by state govts. That is also a reality.

  • @jaydeepgadhavi5465
    @jaydeepgadhavi5465 19 дней назад +1

    At 2:37, I'm not disagreeing with the reasoning, however I wish if we can concretize this analysis with some views from the Chinese side

  • @padmanabhanpaulsamy9788
    @padmanabhanpaulsamy9788 18 дней назад

    Sir, instead of % spending , please tell in billions.

  • @dlooc
    @dlooc 15 дней назад

    Decrease the pensions to retired military personnel. most of the budget is going to pensions and salaries.

  • @PrasanthGPanicker
    @PrasanthGPanicker 19 дней назад

    Didn't the GDP increase? Hasn't the real term spending see an actual rise over the years?

  • @oki148
    @oki148 17 дней назад

    China :- Breathes air
    US :- China
    India :- China
    US :- China
    India :- China
    US :- China
    India :- China
    China :- 🤣🤣🤣