I will be very interested to see how your Magic Beans dials in the AT-300. I have this unit and I have used REW to dial in the sound of my system. I am running my system as a 7.3.6. I have the MiniDSP for my subs. I am sure it is possible but I am curious to see how much better Magic Beans can do than manually setting everything with the help of REW.
Tell me what to pay $$$ Joe and Chana to show me how to room correct using Magic Beans EQ or their own built in room correction. Kudos to Amir @ Summit HiFi. This is a brave move Joe. And what you don't get is that they are coming out with a upgrade called the AT-500.
I wouldn't go with the Tonewinner AT-300 mostly because I would want to set it up as 7.1.6 and it doesn't have DTS:X-Pro, so my DTS:X movies and Neural-X wouldn't be able to use the Top-Middle speakers. And it doesn't have Auro3D processing. So why get that when there is a MUCH better alternative available in the Denon X6700/X6800 and the Marantz 8805 and 8015. And the Sony STR:7000ES. With those models out there, there's no reason to go for the AT-300.
I will be very interested to see how your Magic Beans dials in the AT-300. I have this unit and I have used REW to dial in the sound of my system. I am running my system as a 7.3.6. I have the MiniDSP for my subs. I am sure it is possible but I am curious to see how much better Magic Beans can do than manually setting everything with the help of REW.
Tell me what to pay $$$ Joe and Chana to show me how to room correct using Magic Beans EQ or their own built in room correction. Kudos to Amir @ Summit HiFi.
This is a brave move Joe. And what you don't get is that they are coming out with a upgrade called the AT-500.
13
They should have allowed the at-300 to have the option of using 13 channels and 3 subs or 15 channels and 1 sub. That would be fantastic
I wouldn't go with the Tonewinner AT-300 mostly because I would want to set it up as 7.1.6 and it doesn't have DTS:X-Pro, so my DTS:X movies and Neural-X wouldn't be able to use the Top-Middle speakers. And it doesn't have Auro3D processing. So why get that when there is a MUCH better alternative available in the Denon X6700/X6800 and the Marantz 8805 and 8015. And the Sony STR:7000ES. With those models out there, there's no reason to go for the AT-300.