@@platypuss619 The politicians trying to "take care" of people using tax dollars and government programs are keeping people in poverty. The goal for them is not to help. It's to keep people down so the politicians can buy their votes later.
Charlotte Iserbyt, whistle blower, author of “The Dumbing Down of America...,” senior policy advisor of Reagan’s BOE, stated that, “If you want to know what goes on in those “meetings” watch “Eyes Wide Shut.”
@@jamestown4867 And I can't remember which Kubrick movie it was, but they removed lots of parts that were to revealing either without his approval or after his death.
kubrick hated hollywood, he hated the film company executives so much he would do anything to avoid having to work with them which is why he made most of his movies in the uk.
That’s why he made “eyes wide shut” exposing the Hollywood elites. And he died a mysterious death like a week after filming, and supposedly a whole lot of the film was cut out and lost forever to no choice of his own
@@dr.penguin9412 His constant reference to Rainbows in eyes wide shut Interesting, the founder of NXIVM had schools called Rainbow Cultural Garden Even more Interesting. The term where the rainbow ends, comes from the Ancient Occult belief, that, if you offered a child up to Moloch, you got to keep any gold or jewels that was found at the end of the rainbow. Of course in ancient times, they actually believed there was gold under the rainbow. Today, we know, its a trick of the light.
Thats right, like 98% of people will think im crazy if i told them hollywood and the music industry and the news is casting spells on you to keep you asleep. Keep your eyes closed.
@@davelebowski2859 You obviously have never seen him with a full panel asking him questions. Biden was there before in the 80's with him, making no sense (Biden). What you have said is not true or fact, only what you feel, which is worthless. You make up things to say so you feel better. Pathetic.
...New world order led by obama and pope francis is coming. Jesus christ is coming back for the rapture. Get ready. Dont believe the coming ufo alien abduction narrative
The young boy with the apollo sweater on, my mother designed that sweater in 1969 and it was sent to Dr Gilruth who passed it onto Neil Armstrong. My mother was the fastest knitter in the world at the time, Gwen Matthewman. The sweater now resides in the history museum in Ohio US. The pattern for the sweater was released in late 1969 by Lister and that's how a copy ended up in the movie.
@@LiGhTfOoT_ Its one of those movies especially in the space sequences that make you feel like you're high on drugs its a hypnotic ambient experience that you'll never forget.
2001 blew a lot of minds back then, including mine. The special effects compared to everything else at the time was literal witchcraft. '69 was also the last year for Star Trek. Coincidence?👀🤣
On the set of dr. Strangelove Kubrick had so accurately depicted the cockpit of the B-52 he actually got a visit from the government because the specs hadn't yet been declassified.
@@emperortrevornorton3119 Kubrick basically recreated the cockpit from a small snippet of a magazine photograph that showed a small section of the guages, etc. Kubrick, with the help of aviators and experts, then filled out the rest of the cockpit how they believed it would look. They were basically spot on.
Hey ... where's major Kong?! The Apollo missions should have brought a state of the art 35 mm or 70 mm motion picture production camera. And ... the starscape would have appeared even better than those on top of Mount Everest at Night; except that such starscapes would have been visible in daylight on the moon because there is no atmosphere scattering of sunlight. The moon has no atmosphere. Why were no photographs taken of starscapes directly overhead using a shaded lens to block sunlight reflected off the regolith, and in the shade of the LEM, on a tracking tripod, with a long shutter exposure? Answer: That would be even harder to fake with enough precision to fool even an amateur astronomer; let alone thousands of them. And yes, the Earth and moon are spherical, space is a hard vacuum, and rockets are able to work in space by following Newton's Laws of conservation of momentum ... unlike a certain magic bullet I can still recall. We need to all live longer to grow wise to all the b.s. propaganda myths we are spoon fed from birth. Telomerase, Cannabis, and Iv3rm3ctin For All! Worldwide General Strike and Cease Fire! Hey RUclips! Don't ...
Hmm... China, USA, India, Isreal, Japan, Europe, have all sent multiple missions to the moon since 2005. China successfully landed (unmaned) missions on the moon in 2013, 2018 & again in 2020 and now have a couple of kilos of moon rock back their Earth labs from the 2020 mission. India & Isreal missions crashed landed on the Moon in 2019 (lander missions failed) USA (one with South Korea) have 3 separate moon orbit missions happening right now. There are 20+ more known missions including multiple landings planned by all the above and others like Australia, Canada, UAE, Turkey, Ukraine, UK, Mexico, Netherlands, Europe and more in the next couple of years.
It doesn't surprise me at all. It cost a lot of money, they won the cold war, people were losing interest. There's only renewed interest coz the us is falling behind china
@@rfgson im not gunna let you get away with that comment are you hoping no one will fact check you, the us have a problem with there rocket so no they havnt gone anywhere they apparently want to send an unmanned rocket to the moon to make way for another one later on with astronauts. If they have been there whats the need for that. No one ever has landed and will never land on the moon
@dont tripbot It's because of Neuschwabenland. The Nazis supposedly built a base in Antarctica that was rumored to have a tropical climate. Theories about this range from Nazis discovered the hollow earth to Nazis used the base to build the UFO like bell crafts and then escaped to the moon.
Stanley Kubrick was arguably the best Director ever known to Hollywood Cinema, but the man was absolutely insane. He was talking to the key grip of one of his moves while driving. He crashed his car into a ditch mid conversation and didn’t even react. He just kept talking about the movie
@@IsaacTheSalsaShark Lol it could be, because a "crash" doesn't mean cars flipping and engines exploding. It could have easily been a nick off of a pole.
4:41 Rogan cracks me up when his guest tries to detour from the conversation Rogan wants to have. "Nixon bombed Cambodia!" "Yeah," then goes back to his train of thought.
Calumet means peace pipe. One of the sub themes of The Shining was about the slaughter of the American Indians. Remember, the Overlook hotel was built on an Indian burial ground.
How about the guy who was doing a house clean out for someone and found all the copies of NASA Footage in a basement along with NASA electronic equipment. And the fucking dummy called NASA and they immediately picked it all up, and told him he could keep the old equipment, and never spoke of what was on all those reels, many claim it was all original unedited footage of moon landings, alien edits, et artifact edits, god only knows. We get a chance and anyone of us would upload it all online but this scared “do Gooder” fucked it up. Nobody knows where or how all those shelves of original footage ever ended up in that old basement and til this day NASA hasn’t said a peep about what they recovered.
Yeah, the calculations are no longer there because they deleted or destroyed all of that information? A woman Katherine Johnson who was apparently brilliant did all the math. Don Pettit literally says we can't go back because we don't have the technology. Search him on here. Is so strange that we go backwards with this specific technology with the stupidest explanations as to why.
The world has lost a ton of data and historical TV, because magnetic tapes were so expensive they were constantly reused.. But I guess we also lose a lot with hard drives, that we also rewrite over these days.. :)
This is how you know the whole thing is complete baloney. If the moon landings were real, those cassettes or whatever would have been put under a maximum security museum and replayed every year on the anniversary. Moon dust would likewise be studied by universities around the world and handled with extreme care but lo and behold! Like the tapes, the moon samples also disappeared! And the technology to get back to the moon? Also no longer available! Because in 1969, the tech to do it was so advanced, we can't replicate it today! I feel sorry for anyone who believes all this horse shit.
Been onto these scammers since the 50's and 60's Did the Germans really start WW2? Try why did some outfit declare war on the Germans in Mar 1933! That's why Hitler had a certain crew locked up, just as the US locked up 100's of 1000's of the Japanese community after Pearl Harbor History is the Greatest lesson in life, never forget it
A year after watching the Shining I get dropped off at a fly-in remote lodge on Lake Clark Alaska in the winter. Closest community of 12 people is a 10 mile walk across a frozen lake. The guy helping me drop my stuff off asked me if I was afraid of ghosts because the lodge was built on an old Indian graveyard and there had been caretakers there who claimed to see their ghosts as well as the ghost of a woman who tripped on float plane dock and got decapitated. I must admit my mind strayed to the movie a few times in the months I spent there and wished I hadn't seen the movie.
Haha i was working in Ireland and the job took longer, sowe booked into a local hotel we found online, The Montague.. sounded cool. We arrived, looked a nice place, once inside, still looked cool.. once we were booked in and being shown to our rooms, the long very dated corridors, gave me an overwhelming feeling almost complete dankness. Exactly like the shining, once in the room, the door was flimsy like it had been kicked in, there was glass on the mattress under the sheet, I refused to stay, something didn't feel right, and I trust my gut... We left and booked into one down the road , few days later on a job, radio said the Montague had now been closed and was to be used for immigrants to Ireland, shootings and crazy shit happened there that's why was shut down . Really weird place, still get shudders thinking bout it..
Joe "I really like that hat!" Fitzdog "Yeah, I found it in a garbage can outside The Comedy Store, the day after the 2016 election. I had to wash it because it smelled like elk and weed.""
I am not sure Joe has ever done 5meo, he talks about DMT a lot, but usually NN DMT. That does not come from the toad, they are two totally different things.
I watched full metal jacket being filmed. It was shot at Beckton gas works in East London just around the corner from where I lived. It's also where the famous Jean Michel Jarre concert "destination docklands" was held in 1989. I sung in the choir that night along with a couple hundred other kids from poor East London schools (the famous fashion designer Lee Alexander McQueen was standing next to me as we went to school together). There's videos on here where I can watch myself aged 13 singing by Jean on a floating stage lol. One amazing night I'll never forget. We had a pretty awesome childhood for poor East London kids.
@@daveelson213 haha good times 🤭 the part where I'm on camera is when they walked 300 of us kids onto stage with our red life jackets which we all hated cos they smelt horrible and sweaty. I had bushy curly hair back then and was standing next to Alexander and a massive black lad that I remember being bigger than my dad 🤣 to this day I still see lazers and fireworks when I close my eyes and I'm sure my crap hearing is to do with that amazing night 😆
A clockwork orange is one of the craziest movies I have ever watched, easily my favorite movie by kubrick. If any of you have not watched it I highly recommend!
Fifty three years ago we went to the moon but cannot do it today? This is a disconnect in logic. The press conference is unbelievably depressing when it should be a celebration.
@@seanpratt4704 And totally PROVES Rogan is Controlled opposition. ...the young, hip, cool, "happening" dude, that everyone "loves", ...to sell us a MOUNTAINOUS AVALANCHE OF HORSESH!T! Same with Russell Brand! Theyre both PUPPETS of the satanic globalists!
My favorite movie of Kubrick is the masterpiece "Barry Lyndon". The cinematography of that movie is nothing short of amazing given the time in which it was made and was filmed with all natural lighting of the period. No other movie I've seen captures the feeling of a time period quite like Barry Lyndon (with the lone exception being Ridley Scott's "The Duellists".)
I was eleven yrs old and I recall the commentator explaining as the flag was planted that it was a stiff or springy material so that it would appear to wave. Yet somehow that was missed by theorists who use the waving flag as another piece of evidence.
Joe advocated for lockdowns and masks, then he left CA to get away from it. He’s a simpleton and easily manipulated. He trusts those “officials” who get in his head because he’s too stupid to discern fact from fiction, and therefore is not in that camp. He would believe in leprechauns if an Irish scholar told him they exist. Remember Bigfoot? He’s an old man with the intellect of a child.
The difference in moon walking "quality" between missions could be, yes the 1/6 gravity, but NASA even had a training program on how to walk on the moon. Astronauts reported how difficult it is, how center of mass can not be controlled, so a training program on how to actually walk on moon was started since first mission. Perhaps learning different body mechanics, not even natural at first, led to improvements(?) So the later missions do look more fluid.
Yeah you watched them fly a tin can with 1/,1,000,000 of our current computing power. On your black and white TV with rabbit ears antenna. On the first attempt. Grow up.
They never landed on the moon . Have you people never experienced listening to a person relate the most intense strange experience ever in their life . They gush with excitement and can't hold themselves back from relating every little detail .....
@@Gerrardboss-v2g sure, ever see someone do that a month later while exhausted? Watch the WHOLE press conference after Apollo 11. It matches perfectly, Also, faking it IS. NOT. POSSIBLE. If I stood in directly in front of you, would it be possible for me to convince you that I walked ten feet away and then walked back if you don’t look away? That would be just as difficult as faking going to the moon.
There's something with a magazine that Jack Nicholson's character is reading before his job interview, I think it's a Playboy issue where they talk about pedophilia and stuff
I have never been able to reconcile the picture of the earth rising when they were on the moon how small it was -- more like what the moon looks like from Earth. It should have looked absolutely HUGE.
It looks small because there is nothing on the surface to create a true sense of scale . I try to enjoy the night sky at work . I notice the moon looking very small as I cross a huge flat parking lot , 20ft buildings visable at a great distance . During my first break , the moon will appear even smaller as I look out past the parking lot and lack of buildings . During lunch the moon has moved over our campus and looks much larger because other objects appear closer to the moon
You're correct, the moon is slightly larger than 1/4 the size of earth, .27% actually, so the earth is roughly 4 times the size of the moon and would appear as such viewed from the moon. I've argued this point for years, it's the same distance either way, but one object is 4 times the size as the other, and earth would appear to be 4 times the size of our moon if viewed from the moon. Imagine the harvest moons we see in the summer, it's a pretty big ball in the sky, and you can easily make out craters/features on the moon, now imagine if it were 4 times that size, it would be HUGE! Many photos/video taken of earth from the moon don't seem to show the earth that size, I've seen a few that get close, but you'd be able to see all continents easily, you'd easily be able to see the city lights, it would be such an awesome scene you know someone would of put a "web cam" on the moon so we could view the scene anytime we liked, but no one has ever done that, maybe there's other things they've never done.
Another thing that isn't correct to scale, is the dirt they kicked up running around on the moon with their toes and the rover. If the gravity of the moon is 1/6 that of earth, than dust kicked up by a toe would fly up 6 times higher on the moon than it does on earth, video of the astronauts running around kicking up dirt, shows that dirt doesn't get kicked up high at all and falls quickly back down, even dirt off the rovers tires falls quickly to the ground, "for every action there's is an equal and opposite reaction", well that "reaction" would be 6 times greater on the moon, if you're toe kicks up dirt a foot high on earth, it would be kicked up about 6 feet on the moon and it would take 6 times longer to fall back to the ground, and fine dust would be floating all over. They claim on the moon you could hit a golf ball miles cause of lack of gravity, how come the dirt/dust they kick up doesn't even go feet?
@@danthomas9077 sorry but I don’t get how the earth can look 4 times bigger than the moon when standing on the moon. It’s 250,000 miles away and distance makes things look smaller🤔 I’m no scientist but I would have expected the earth to look quite a bit smaller from 1/4 million miles away
It wasn't just with Full Metal Jacket, Eyes Wide Shut was also completely shot in England. Kubrick didn't want to (and at that point probably couldn't) go to New York so he sent people there to take photographs of a couple streets and had them entirely rebuild as sets, lol. That movie's budget was $65m where like $12m went to Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman and rest went to building entire streets of New York. Some scenes where Tom Cruise walks through the streets aren't even him on the set but a rear projection. I wonder who OK'd such a high budget for a movie where a couple people at a time talk to each other in a room and didn't question for what exactly do they need the extra 50 million, haha.
@@ETAisNOW yes free rein in hollyweird but after eyes wide shut they cut an hour out of the film. 5 days b4 the release he was killed. Space mite be the final frontier but its filmed in a Hollywood basement.
When you're a famous director you do what you want or you don't make the movie. Isnt it interesting how making entertainment pays better than doing things that people need to be done- aka essential work. Its not their fault. It's literally our fault. We endorse it. We don't want to pay teachers better but we'll absolutely pay to see the next Marvel film. 🤷♂️ Imagine a world where teachers dictate the terms of how they teach. Crazy.
The guy who stayed in the craft Would have seen the best stars of anybody When he went around to the dark side of the moon The sunlight would have been completely gone The stars would have been amazing
Yup, Michael Collins saw them just fine. The question landing deniers cut out of their cherry picked clip was if they could see the stars through the corona of the sun. Try doing your research.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing Um Yeah it would have been A 2 or 3 hour clip This is just a snippet And I am talking about what they talked about in the snippet They actually talked about a lot of stuff So what I said is spot on You are talking about something that's not in the snippet🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@oldcountryboy yes… my point that flew over your head is that that snippet was deliberately cut to make it look like Michael Collins said he didn’t see any stars. Like I already said, do your own research.
Kubrick released dr Strangelove a few years after the Gulf of tonkin proposal which didn't get exposed and unclassified until many years later... He is sending messages with all of his movies
Um no - your wrong. The Golf of Tonkin resolution was passed on August 1 1964. Dr. Strangelove was released in January of 1964, well before the Tonkin incident.
@@melian9999 look it up. It’s not hard to do. August 2 1964 - the USS Maddox was fired up and hit 3-4 times, sustaining minor damage. But - the Vietnam war was already underway. The Following Tonkin Resolution gave the President authorization to wage war with far less congressional approval. But the US was already in the war.
The man in charge of risk assessment for the entire Apollo program was Joseph Shea, a Ph.D level Engineer from New York. He was hired by NASA around 1963. In 1967, his team of mathematicians, engineers, rocket scientists, medical doctors and meteorologists, nearly 30 professionals, made a determination of the chances for a successful Apollo moon mission. Keep in mind, the NASA administrators required a 99.75% chance of success, before they would green light a launch. Along those lines, NASA cancelled the Space Shuttle program when they recalculated the risk assessment. Prior to 1986, NASA calculated the risk of catastrophic mission failure was 1 in 100,000. After 2 Shuttles mission failures, they determined the risk was 1 in 100 or 1%. And that was too high. Joseph Shea concluded in 1967, the chance of failure ( death of the entire Apollo crew) would be 95% per each launch. At least 10 crews, he concluded, would die before 1 landed on the moon. That was bad news for NASA. They had already spent more than $25 billion of taxpayers money into what was clearly a lost cause. By 1968, the clock was ticking. In April 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001 A Space Odyssey. As luck would have it, the high IQ genius who had helped Kubrick over the past 4 years, to make that movie, was Arthur C Clarke. Clarke was a key advisor to NASA and friends with the very top NASA people in the Apollo program. He is seen in photos with top NASA administrators in the mid 1960's in London. According to the film producer, Bart Sibrel, ( hated by NASA and trolls on all message boards ) he was leaked information that a staged moon landing was done in New Mexico at an Air Force base, under the eye of LBJ and other top military and gov officials. It appears the editing of the film took a long time and might not have been completed until mid 1969. What is important to note about Stanley Kubrick is that he had invented the Front Screen Projection film technique of backdrops, and it is obvious NASA folks used that film technique, to make black backgrounds in the scenes. Today, it looks very fake but NASA had no other option at the time and never guessed the film would be viewed millions of times by independent researchers. The Bart Sibrel film - " A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon "offers proof after proof of the hoax. It can still be seen on YT. One question folks will often ask, after seeing the Bart Sibrel film is, " If NASA faked the moon landing, wouldn't Russia would tell the world ". That is a good question. Consider what Russia would get from that worldwide statement. Nothing. Russia is smart. After all, they were 4-5 years ahead of NASA when they ended the moon mission program, after realizing the radiation barriers were IMPOSSIBLE to penetrate. Russia was way too smart than to yell, " America is lying." They blackmailed Nixon. Some of the blackmail payoffs are known because they were too big and too obvious to hide from anyone. However, there is a good chance a lot of the blackmail package remains secret, and perhaps 90% of it remains unknown. But that is why Russia kept quiet in my view.
@@maxsmith695 A former military police man in his death bed , tells his son about the making of the 'moon landing film at Cannon. This son who is now on in his death bed , terminal sick , tell this on camera. At Cannon , 2 hangers became one big studio.During that time renovations were going on. The trucks with props like sand did not stand out. This MP was given a list with 15 names. These people only , han entry to the studio. Among them...: Emeneger , Armstrong , Van Allen , Von Braun... . Do you think this is legit?A hoax? By the way..English is not my first language.. . I am Belgian.
@@paolojoosten6353 moon landing is 100% a hoax. The confession is real. LBJ declared in May 1968, he was not running for President in Nov 1968 election. He would not be in office in jan 1969, so he was not too worried about the moon landing hoax. Nixon is likely the person who gave the permission of NASA to fake it. Nixon was very unpopular in the summer of 1969 for carrying on a war in Vietnam nobody could explain. I was in a campground the day it was made public, July 20, 1969. Many campers had a radio and listened. Afterwards, nobody bothered to even talk about it. Back then, most people, maybe 99% assumed it was real. By 1985, a growing voice was saying it was fake. After 1995, videos on RUclips began showing all the fakery and professional photographers said it was fake. Those 12 men who say they walked on the moon were kept away from public audiences. Only Bart Sibrel and a few others were able to bring forth a lot of evidence that it was fake. Today in America 75% of adults call it fake.
Have you seen the video of the astronaut saying they recorded over the tapes of the original landing? And the reason they haven’t gone back is because they destroyed the equipment when they returned and it would be “too expensive and too much work to build again.” Yeah, even though our phones have more power and capability than the computer when they “landed on the moon.”
China just went to the dark side of the moon… the reason we never went back is ther is literally nothing there… only thing we learned is that our moon used to be apart of earth… therefore they have more solid evidence on the origins of the moon…
How do they explain no other country going to the moon since. If it was possible to do with 60's technology there would be rich people today doing their own private trips and every nation with a space agency would have a flag on the moon
I have to say those statements made me question. Also one of the Nasa astronouts also said wr cant go cause Van Allen belt and I was like but didnt you do through before, i dunno the whole thing is wierd.
they did know about them the belts were discovered in 1958. and in 2012 2 dedicated probes were sent out to study them. Their suits absolutely had radiation protection because the sun emits radiation. Solar winds affect the belts and i believe only in "space storms" can the belts be dangerous.
2001: A Space Odyssey is a decent indication of what Hollywood special effects could do at the time - and it’s extremely shonky. It genuinely was simpler to film on location.
Aeronautical Engineer/scientist, Albert Taylor, spent almost two decades evaluating satellite system designs & multiple government classified programs (including the Star Wars & the F-117A Stealth Fighter programs) at major aerospace companies in southern California. This lead him to be hired by NASA to work on the International Space Station Program. When he was asked by Art Bell about the moon landing, he replied: "When I saw the landing craft, there is no way I would ever get in that thing. It was way too flimsy."
@MMA vs BOXING sounds like Saint Germaine. He is an immortal with strong ties to the original royal families. Sometimes he pops up in history just to troll people because he is bored.
2001 was released before the first Apollo landing and Kubrick's depiction of the Moon's surface differs greatly from its appearance in the Apollo footage. The movement of characters on the Moon in 2001 differs from that of the filmed movement of Apollo astronauts, and does not resemble an environment with 1/6 the gravity of Earth.
Kubrick wasn't weird, just original. He was just one of the few that let his real ideas come out. Some people have these type of ideas in their brain that are too afraid of letting it out 100% because the fear of what others think. Kubrick just didn't give a shit and that's what made him famous.
No he was on the spectrum for sure. There's being a perfectionist then there's OCD and being a sociopath. He literally didn't care he mentally destroyed many actors who worked with him. Shooting a scene a hundred times in a row is obsessive compulsive behavior especially when there's tons of documentaries showing the inconsistencies in his scenes and things he shouldn't have missed if he shot a scene a hundred times and was a perfectionist. He had OCD and focused on the wrong details. He made great movies don't get me wrong but you can search up all the scene inconsistencies yourself.
@@DIVISIONINCISION in the movie, the way they knew everything Cruise's character was up to, makes me think they were an intelligence agency. Or had ties to. That movie was Kubrick telling the world that the world is run by a cabal of satinists
Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz recounts these simulations in his book, Failure is not an Option: 'In the late 1960s our simulation technology had progressed to the point where it became virtually impossible to separate the training from actual missions. The simulations became full dress rehearsals for the missions down to the smallest detail. The simulation tested out the crews and controllers responses to normal and emergency conditions. It checked out the exact flight plan, mission rules, and procedures that the crew and controllers would use for a later flight.' In 2003 History Channel documentary of the same name: Kranz said: The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission.
That is actually what I have said and thought about Apollo 11. Once I saw a picture of the training facility and you couldn't tell the difference. I also am aware that many false flag events happen with simulation training so the others can't tell the difference of what is real or not such as 9/11 and the London train bombings.
The moon is not in deep space. Deep space is outside the magnetic field of earth. The Moon is within the magnetic field of the earth. Humans has never been outside earths magnetic field.
It's effectively outside of the earth's magnetic field. It's absolutely tiny at the point where the moon is, it's not protected from the solar wind and charged particles.
There is no proof that man has left our magnetic field, but there are stories of black project space force soldiers telling there stories about going places outside our solar system. Anything is possible. Believe it, or not...
NASA's transparency in disclosing the lost tapes lends more credence to the authenticity of Apollo, not less. After all, if the missions were all fake, then the telemetry tapes were faked too, if they even existed at all. Any subsequent drama about them being "lost" would therefore be moot.
There is one piece of evidence that proves what we saw televised and in photos was not filmed on the moon, and it is irrefutable. The lunar lander had a rocket engine pointing straight down in the center underneath the craft with 80,000 lbs of thrust they had to use to set down. It would have made a crater bigger than the lander itself and would have thrown up so much dust it would have been everywhere. Yet, the dust under the lander is undisturbed, no crater, no dust, even the gold foil on the feet of the lander are shiny and clean. They may have gone to the moon, but they didn't do it in that ship or in those photos.
The thrust of the vessel is not turned up to 80k lbs the entire descent. As the lander descends, the thrust starts at a full burn to reduce the speed of the lander and take it out of orbit. The lander then slows its speed down gradually, both vertical speed AND its horizontal speed (it just left an orbital velocity of ~2,040 miles per hour). As the lander uses up fuel (which is heavy and a significant majority of the vehicles total mass) the lander also becomes significantly lighter, as the entire vessel is designed form the get to to have utilized almost all of its fuel before landing so it weighs less and then requires less fuel expenditure for the finer adjustments in the final descent (hence there is a "point of no return" window during initial descent). As the landers speed becomes slower, it requires less and less thrust to maintain that speed. By the time the lander has began its final descent window, the lander is only moving at 1.12 miles per hour (0.5m/s) and given its current mass at the time of touchdown only required a little bit over 1000lbs of thrust to maintain the ~0.5m/s speed for a safe landing. When you consider that the landing module had a max thrust output of 45000N and 1000lbs thrust is roughly equivalent to 4,448.22N, the engine was firing at only 10% of its power. In addition to all of this and you can visually observe exactly where the minor amount of rocks/dust were displaced in a line along the path of its last few feet of landing (the lander was still moving horizontally before touchdown) in many of the photos of the landing site (i can link you the one you can see it the clearest on if you would like) (and some math too) Apollo stack, LM + CSM = 46 tons, only the LM landed on the moon. LM had two stages, ascent (get crew back to command module) and descent (the thing you said needed 80k lbs of thrust). Ascent stage had a mass of 4.7 tons fully fueled Descent stage had an empty mass (fuel used up) of 2.0 tons Total landed mass of the LM was 6.7 tons. It had a mass of 6.7 tons on landing, and since lunar gravity is 1/6th of Earth, only ~1.1 tons of thrust was needed the last 50 meters before landing
That was definitely faked nasa is pretty much one of the biggest scams that ever happened the reason they never go back or plan too is now they understand with the type of cameras that exist now you can see everything too perfectly clear it's easy too fool a bunch of people with blurry images now that we can really see what's going on they domt dare take images of the moon with these modern cameras right but people are still stupid enough to believe this happened
@@marettmrc I think most understand there was a throttle. The spirit of his assertion still stands. There is so much more to that piece of footage as well. All of it, everywhere has problems and the footage of the trip is one of the biggest challenges to NASA's credibility. Pivot points of men in 'space suits' lining up exactly where cables would be used in their training, some footage slowed down for effect and the jump heights are no different than a person on Earth, other times they are jumping higher. People literally receiving help from cables getting up after having fallen over, There's bullshit everywhere, even the 'Moon' rock that Neil Armstrong gave to Amsterdam was fake. It was petrified wood.
The Shining makes passing references to genocide and past evils because the hotel is evil and seems to suggest evil is cyclical, at least with Jack’s appearance in the end photo. Kubrick loved to hear people’s interpretations of his films, but would rarely state his intentions. He put a lot of thought into each shot and what went into the frame.
Final Scene: the pick of Jack in ballroom July 4 1921=Federal Reserve Cronies Celebrating their take over of America via their Puppet Woodrow Wilson, their profit off WWl and their plan to make the US and its citizens permanent Debt Slaves w/ their plans for the Great Depression soon to follow...
@@MA-qe2sn Rob Ager on RUclips makes interesting videos on hidden themes like Gold and the Federal Reserve in The Shining. I’m sure you have seen it. Very interesting
Have you seen the press conferences the astronauts gave when they returned to earth? They look so depressed it's unreal. Shouldn't they be smiling ear to ear after the adventure of a life time? Something is definitely off.
Because they lived a lie that is why they looked so depressed it was all a set up a propaganda stunt.Put your hand on the bible you went to the moon gentleman? None of them did.
Chris, Kubrick died on March 7th,1999. Eye's Wide Shut release date (July 16th, 1999). As for July 16th, that was the 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Launch, (July 16th, 1969.) As for Kubrick, his death, (March 7th), was 666 days before January 1st, 2001.... At any rate, we have Kubrick, Apollo 11, Eye's Wide Shut, & 1-1-2001 ( The 666 days.) Back to ''The Shining'', (which is also about Elites.) In a scene showing an overhead view of the Maze, if you look hard at it a certain way, you can see what looks like the numbers ''444'', right in the center of the Maze. As for the movie, The Box Office Sales for The Shining came in at $44.4 Million, (444.) Between Kubrick helping NASA, we have the Elites, Child Sexual Abuse, (In both The Shining & Eye's Wide Shut.) And also a lot of Numerology, all tied together...
@@altergreenhorn definitely. I’ve seen it countless times since and it is by far my favorite movie of all time. Even got to see it in the theaters at a special showing and oooooh my god! I just wasn’t used to having my mind fucked like that at the time haha
@@craneo7905 I watched this movie when I was a child with my father who loves it. I don't get why that would be strange, most parents show their favorite films to their kids
I like this type of conversation that Joe was talking about. It's fascinating. If only Stanley talked about why he did that. Did anyone ever interview him about it?
Nobody ever did because Stanley did not and COULD NOT possibly have faked Apolo. Al you have to do is watch his movie"2001"; His rendering of zero-g, and of the Moon do not look like the real thing. NoboDy had either the technology or the knowledge to fake Apollo; NOTE THAT TO THIS DAY, NO CONVINCING SIMULATION OF THE APOLLO LUNAR SURFACE EVA'S HAS EVER BEEN MADE.
@@1carpentrys No. I think Kubrick did the best he could with the technology and information he had, and he succeeded in making one of THE best movies ever made. I also think it is perfectly obvious, for reasons too numerous to even list, that Apollo was not faked, and certainly not faked by Kubrick.
Kubrick was an absolute perfectionist and demanded no restrictions on the process and the content of his movies. Some claim he ran into some G intemperance when making Dr Strangelove and 2001. Some say he made a deal with the G to produce something in exchange for free reign.(Later NASA gave him a unique lens to film Barry Lyndon). It was a deal he forever regretted which why he put all kinds of hidden clues in The Shinning...Danny's Apollo 11 sweater, Tang on the storage shelves, A11 work and no play etc. Some say it's why he made Eyes Wide Shut as an expose (we didn't get to see Kubricks intended/uncut version as he died suddenly right before it was released).
@@goead Because there was more than enough footage of the original landing so they reused the tapes on other missions. For whatever reason, maybe they were cataloging missing stuff or something, they put out a request to see if anyone had them laying around which started a search through the archives and they concluded it was reused. It wasn't a big deal but people go "ermaghed they lost the tapes".
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD - “More than enough footage”. Who are you kidding? Probably the most important event in human history and they have too much footage of it? What a joke. I’ve heard the Library of Congress is an absolute disaster, and everything is misfiled and all over the place, so I could believe an American organisation screwed up, but not that they deleted it because they had too much footage.
@movid he once went to the moon playing the role of a guy named Neil Armstrong just to get a feeling for what it would really be like when he had to fake the moon landing in nevada. Nasa said the budget was too high and kubrick said fuck nasa because If you want a job faked right you gotta make the experience as real as possible. So he took a team of researchers to the moon then brought back moon rock for props in nevada. Of course they had to be marked with stage letters to set them apart from the regular nevada rocks. He didn't realise the whole of nevada was a stage so naturally all the stones were marked so they lost the real moonrocks. Eventually they had to go back to the moon to get more moon rocks to fake a moon landing in nevada, all so they could pretend a team of scientists went to the moon and finally let some nerds get some tang.
I would love to hear Joe’s takes on Kubrick’s movies for once rather than the same filler stuff we hear every time. “Did you hear how Kubrick faked the moon landing? Did you see the carpet in the Shining?” Or “he was a weird guy.” I really don’t know if I’ve ever heard Joe discuss what he likes about his movies or what has stuck with him over the years. I don’t think I’ve ever even heard him say that Kubrick used a aperture lens that was used by NASA to document the dark side of the Moon in Barry Lyndon and how that could be evidence for the silly fake moon landing theory. It’s always just 2001 or the Shining.
Moon landings - first time in human history when a super successful engineering feat was followed by just stopping completely. Then they have the balls to say they want to go to Mars. LOL.
@@deafbyhiphop said, " There's was Wikileaks footage showing that the moon landing was shot in the Nevada desert. Not True "The film clip you're referring to was taken from the production of the 1978 movie Capricorn One, which tells the story of a badly faked human mission to Mars... WikiLeaks had no involvement whatsoever! and has no files on fake Moon landings. All the information leaked by people holding governments accountable, all admit to finding nothing about fake Moon landings. We landed on the Moon.
#1 thing for me is when I look up at the sky at night, even with all the light pollution where I live, even with the thicker atmosphere, dirt, whatever else... I can see stars everywhere. When I look at both the moon landings and the live space station feed (anyone can watch it publicly)... where are the stars??? Without the atmosphere getting in the way, they should be brighter. Instead it's pitch black everywhere you look. I'm sat watching the live cam right now. Who turned the lights off?
I live in a moderate urban area, and only a handful of stars (talking a dozen or less) are visible on most nights. You underestimate the amount of light reflected off the surface of the earth, and more importantly the subsequent adjustments in the camera lenses in order to have a proper image. Same reason your cellphone can't take a photo of all the stars in the sky if there's a light source nearby: cameras have less bandwidth than the human eye.
Imagine looking up at the moon and believing that some boomers went up there, drove a golf cart, and then nasa “lost the technology.” Or even just imagine believing the government tells the proles the truth.
NASA didn't lose the technology. only not believing something because the government says it is ridiculous. Especially in the context of the cold war, wouldn't the Soviets do everything to dispute that it happened, had it not? Then why didn't they say anything? It's almost as if they came to the conclusion it was real too. There are so many logical problems with the moon landing conspiracy theory. I bet, if the government told you to breathe you would do everything to prevent yourself from breathing.
Not sure about the moonshots yet I do recall laughing at our American traits when after the initial landing it seemed like within a few months we had a dune buggy up there tearing up the regolith like a boss. So typically American, faked or not.
The funny thing is that everyone says this, but it's not quite accurate. He would be the guy you would want to put it all together - well, except that you would have some very intense moments with astronauts gripping the side of their seats and their eyes rolling back in their heads. But all joking aside, the guy you would want would be DOUG TRUMBALL. He is the ONLY one who could have pulled it off. But even with Trumball's genius, the effects would suffer the same fate as all FX of the time - the fact that they don't age well. As much as people may argue, this simply hasn't happened with the moon footage. Otherwise, we would have movies at that time with that level of "FX" in them. We don't.
Oh it's more than idle speculation. The story I heard is that when he was making Dr Strangelove....he needed to recreate the bomber/cockpit for filming. He went to the G and asked for access. DENIED! He then proceeded to scrounge up every photograph in LIFE and LOOK mags and any source he could locate with any partial pictures and perfectly recreated the plane on his own. This is what put him on their radar.
@@dvnobles Kubrick got himself on their radar when he reconstructed a bomber perfectly for making Dr Strangelove. Later NASA gave him a one-off lens to film Barry Lyndon in candlelight. BTW - have you seen i pic of the lunar module lately? That "tech" didn't age well. It looks like it was made from a child's Erector Set and a roll of tinfoil.
Yea no chance it came from a lab funded by the NIH.... Title: *"2018: Fauci on resuming gain-of-function research funding. Its just as Rand Paul said"* ruclips.net/video/BXB-Nt5kV1U/видео.html&ab_channel=SILVIEWmedia
the weirdest thing was a nasa guy saying we have lost the technology to go to space. my phone has more processing speed than the entire nasa complex back in 1960
IDK. I’ve watched that clip, and IMO, I read his statement not as “we can’t ever go back” but as “we don’t physically have the technology and would have to re-engineer it all” which is true. Just my thoughts. There is plenty though to leave one wondering…
@@coderexe30 Yep. Dumb people like to take the words outta context. A few of the reasons we haven’t gone back is money. People can’t fathom we were in a stupid technology race with other parts of the word and there was a lot of manpower, time and and money dumped into the project. What that guy means and others when they say the technology can’t be replicated is; There wasn’t exact plans for plenty items as a lot of things were hand made and modified pretty much as they went. It’s not like there’s cad drawing of all the stuff. Most people would be able to comprehend the complexity of just the engines alone, it’s no wonder they can’t get a handle on the whole thing. Advanced technology has always baffled primitive men. People saying their phone has more computing power than the shuttles don’t know what they’re talking about just repeating what they heard, and there’s videos in b&w on yt from the national archives I believe showing all kinds of the technology and testing incoming which is only a fraction of the whole.
I think they say that because the technology was improvised by all the top tier scientists and mechanics and therefore not really a single plan was made. I dont know what to think of it but thats the explaination given
Missions to the Moon have been conducted by the following nations and entities (in chronological order): the Soviet Union, the United States, Japan, the European Space Agency, China, India, Luxembourg, and Israel. Russia has plans to go back this year apparently too. Thats a lot of lying to keep alive if you ask me.
I visited the Kubrick archives in London and one of the things that was cut out of the script for Eyes Wide Shut was a dream that Nicole Kidman's character has where Tom Cruise's character is crucified on a cross in front of the masked crowd. Spooky shit.
@@MC_1993 go look again at the ending of the movie now. You may have to go frame by frame in a couple parts but Nicole and Tom are giving their kid away to two men in trench coats that were at the party at the beginning of the film. Very subtle but very spooky lol. changes almost the entire movie imo.
Why is that spooky? The whole point of the movie is "lol look at this weird sex cult." Sounds pretty par for the course to me. If anything, probably would have made it less boring.
I have been a professional photographer ( and videographer) for most of my life. I never really gave the " fake moon landing "theory much thought until I saw the PBS commercial with Big Bird and some little girl with the astronauts on the moon. ... Big Bird and the little girl were JUST as believable as the astronauts.
A few decades aga I saw the professional photographer who was one of the first to say that the photos proved that the moon landing was faked. His main argument was he couldn't see the stars in the sky in the moon walk pictures. As an amateur photographer , even I knew you wouldn't see the stars because they were too faint and with the exposure set for the bright moon surface they wouldn't appear in the photos I suppose that they are Professional Photographers and they are professional photographers
What a load of crap. You're a "professional photographer", but you use a fake name on RUclips and have ZERO content on your RUclips channel. Right. Well I AM a professional photographer, an actual published professional photographer. And you didn't provide one single inkling of addressing the lighting which ANY ACTUAL professional photographer would do. So you can read and learn from my post above, but I'll hit he highlights here for you mister "professional photographer. 1. The lighting is reflective light from the Regolith, the highly reflective dust covering the moon. Those "multiple light sources" you kids think you see are REFLECTIVE LIGHT. Just like we use in the field with our reflectors. ANY pro photographer, would know that. 2. The stars can't be exposed in a Single Lens Reflex camera if there is also SUNLIGHT competing with them, which their ALWAYS was on the moon since the astronauts landed on the SUN side of the moon and not the dark side of it. Any pro photographer would know that. So I'm calling you out. Feel free to provide your "Professional Photographers" website, or any of your published works along with your real name, then let's here your "professional opinion" on why you think the photos are fake. I just debunked them but feel free to try to come up with some sort of nonsense. I'll be happy to shoot it down. But yea, you're no professional photographer. I can't even find you on Google. You can google my name and find my work. I tried "Kerry Prance" photography and guess what came back? Nothing. Here are the results; www.google.com/search?q=Kerry+Prance+photography&oq=Kerry+Prance+photography&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i512l5j46i175i199i512j0i22i30j0i10i22i30l2.5306j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Meanwhile google my name, and you can easily find my work; www.google.com/search?q=Chris+Weber+photography&sxsrf=ALiCzsZPnnQoGjcz_bKdhHOdst9qZI7J8A%3A1666292588247&ei=bJtRY_nTDvXf5NoPncm0yAQ&ved=0ahUKEwj5ucHOv-_6AhX1L1kFHZ0kDUkQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=Chris+Weber+photography&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBwgAEIAEEA0yBAgAEB46BggAEAcQHkoECEEYAEoECEYYAFAAWJwLYP8NaABwAHgAgAGXAYgBoQqSAQQxLjEwmAEAoAEBwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz In fact that's my photograph in the lower left hand corner. Where's yours mister pro? My profile on headshotcrew; headshotcrew.com/chrisweberstudios I've been published more than 100 times, in multiple publications and online and while I stopped practicing three years ago, you can still find my work everywhere. I can't find a single solitary thing related to photography for "Kerry Prance". So yea, I'm definitely calling bulls#@. You clearly don't know the first thing about light exposure, and you are clearly just trolling to push these inane "me-generation" conspiracy theories.
Exactly. You wouldn't see them in a photograph because they were standing in direct SUNLIGHT. Can't expose for the stars AND the sun simultaneously. Even a halfway decent amateur photographer ought to know that.
I like how Joe continually peppers in the "Im not saying they faked it" statements several times throughout because he knows that people will pick out a few seconds of dialog and say "Joe said___!"
"Apollo Program" Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time. Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun. Director: Stanley Kubrick Art Director: John Hoesli. Writer: Arthur C Clarke. Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth. Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars.
I'm saying it on every video. Please get Thomas Sowell on the podcast while he's still around! He's in his 90's.
Joe should have done that when he was still in California. Be very hard to drag Thomas Sowell out that far now.
@@sirrathersplendid4825 zoom
Sowell would be great
You mean the guy whose spews a philosophy that creates a society that only cares about the self instead of the collective? yeah fuck that guy
@@platypuss619 The politicians trying to "take care" of people using tax dollars and government programs are keeping people in poverty. The goal for them is not to help. It's to keep people down so the politicians can buy their votes later.
Stanley Kubrick was ahead of his time. Eyes Wide Shut is literally what is happening in the world right now with the Epstein/McAffee cases
👁
It is?
maybe he was ahead of his time, maybe he knew the people who were planning society
Charlotte Iserbyt, whistle blower, author of “The Dumbing Down of America...,” senior policy advisor of Reagan’s BOE, stated that, “If you want to know what goes on in those “meetings” watch “Eyes Wide Shut.”
@@jamestown4867 And I can't remember which Kubrick movie it was, but they removed lots of parts that were to revealing either without his approval or after his death.
kubrick hated hollywood, he hated the film company executives so much he would do anything to avoid having to work with them which is why he made most of his movies in the uk.
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny!
That’s why he made “eyes wide shut” exposing the Hollywood elites. And he died a mysterious death like a week after filming, and supposedly a whole lot of the film was cut out and lost forever to no choice of his own
@@dr.penguin9412 that last part isn't true. He did deliver a final cut to Warner 2 days before he died, just needed some post production stuff done.
@@hipsterelephant2660 I heard there were things removed from the final cut though. Could be BS though. Idk
@@dr.penguin9412 His constant reference to Rainbows in eyes wide shut
Interesting, the founder of NXIVM had schools called Rainbow Cultural Garden
Even more Interesting. The term where the rainbow ends, comes from the Ancient Occult
belief, that, if you offered a child up to Moloch, you got to keep any gold or jewels that was found
at the end of the rainbow. Of course in ancient times, they actually believed there was gold
under the rainbow. Today, we know, its a trick of the light.
“It's Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” - Mark Twain
Right not that is so true. Trying to shine some light on the things goin on to someone and they just won’t believe it
Joe doesn't believe that bunk he's too big to admit it though.
Jesus...haven't heard that one before in a RUclips comment section quote cemetery...
@@ryublueblanka I actually haven't, thank you very much lol.
Thats right, like 98% of people will think im crazy if i told them hollywood and the music industry and the news is casting spells on you to keep you asleep. Keep your eyes closed.
We need to raise Thomas Sowell to the forefront while he is still around!!!
lol Sowell is a joke, he can't do his thing in a room where people ask actual questions
@@davelebowski2859 You obviously have never seen him with a full panel asking him questions. Biden was there before in the 80's with him, making no sense (Biden). What you have said is not true or fact, only what you feel, which is worthless. You make up things to say so you feel better. Pathetic.
@@davelebowski2859 there are more vidoes of him doing live debates in front of audiences than i can count
@@davelebowski2859 There are plenty of videos of him with an entire panel and he demolishes everyone of their claims.
On the forefront of what? More tax cuts for the wealthy?
"They got Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landing but he was such a perfectionist he insisted on shooting it on the moon".
Have you heard Joe Rogan’s song
Elk Meat & DMT
Look it up, it’s hilarious!!
I smoked weed inside my local in my recent RUclips video 👀
winner of best comment today🏆
ruclips.net/video/dRXTMrjJtjg/видео.html.
ruclips.net/video/dRXTMrjJtjgy/видео.htmly
Joe Rogan gets interviewed a lot
Underrated comic
The Joe Rogan Experience
Have you seen the video
Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones
It’s too fucking funny!! 😂
@@StarBright818 no i will look for it
...New world order led by obama and pope francis is coming. Jesus christ is coming back for the rapture. Get ready. Dont believe the coming ufo alien abduction narrative
The young boy with the apollo sweater on, my mother designed that sweater in 1969 and it was sent to Dr Gilruth who passed it onto Neil Armstrong. My mother was the fastest knitter in the world at the time, Gwen Matthewman. The sweater now resides in the history museum in Ohio US. The pattern for the sweater was released in late 1969 by Lister and that's how a copy ended up in the movie.
Nice.
Cool facts. !!! & connection. Hey can I order a few sweaters and some winter hats.
YOUR MOM KNEW LUCKY LUCIANO.....THAT SWEATER WAS KNITTED FOR MY BROTHER BUT I WOULD WEAR IT.... SMALL WORLD
My mom does molly
@@judd0112 Unfortunately mum died in 2014 aged 86
Kubrick was one of those crazy genius type of guy
he almost has a masterclass movie in every genre
Look up
Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones
It’s hilarious! 😆
Go find Jay Meyers docu on eyes wide shut.. His RUclips channel was shut down with 400000 subs.
He is very good.. 👍
@@funart6210 no
One of those sure
facts
I approached 2001: A space odyssey thinking it was going to be some 1960s star trek level production and man was I wrong. The flick blew my mind.
I've always heard people talk about it. I have to check it out
Could have been edited down to 45 min. The movie would have been twice as good if the ape scenes were removed completely
The classic Westworld is legit
@@LiGhTfOoT_
Its one of those movies especially in the space sequences that make you feel like you're high on drugs its a hypnotic ambient experience that you'll never forget.
2001 blew a lot of minds back then, including mine. The special effects compared to everything else at the time was literal witchcraft. '69 was also the last year for Star Trek. Coincidence?👀🤣
Joe: A thing was never just a thing
Greg: wow
😂😂
Rest in powerful peace Stanley Kubrick 🙏
26 July 1928 ~
7 March 1999⚘
A director so damn good, he fooled the world, that's what I call talent.
@@floridaman4596unmatched talent
🐲 the Year of the Dragon 1928🐉
Kubrick is the director that all directors want to be.
Kubrick died 2 weeks before eyes wide shut premiered on ”heart attack” …. It pretty much confirms everything
" Kubrick is the director that all directors want to be. "
What? Dead?
Was
@@peterpoop7760 Or "Even more respected and famous after he dies".
@@sthubbins4038
Dying is a very short-sighted way to become "even more respected and famous" don't you think?
I swear, I've never listened to Greg Fitzsimmons' stand-up but I love everytime he's on JRE. It's like reconnecting with an old friend.
He's good on Carolla too.
@@amc78 will check it out
He looks like a sheep dog trainer
I always wondered why he was on joes podcast
Fitzsimmons is the man!
On the set of dr. Strangelove Kubrick had so accurately depicted the cockpit of the B-52 he actually got a visit from the government because the specs hadn't yet been declassified.
My cousin who worked on one said that the most accurate cockpit in a movie is that movie
@@emperortrevornorton3119 Kubrick basically recreated the cockpit from a small snippet of a magazine photograph that showed a small section of the guages, etc. Kubrick, with the help of aviators and experts, then filled out the rest of the cockpit how they believed it would look. They were basically spot on.
Reminds me when Tom Clancy got a visit from the government because of how accurate depictions were in Hunt for Red October and his other books
Woah that's cool
Hey ... where's major Kong?!
The Apollo missions should have brought a state of the art 35 mm or 70 mm motion picture production camera.
And ... the starscape would have appeared even better than those on top of Mount Everest at Night; except that such starscapes would have been visible in daylight on the moon because there is no atmosphere scattering of sunlight. The moon has no atmosphere. Why were no photographs taken of starscapes directly overhead using a shaded lens to block sunlight reflected off the regolith, and in the shade of the LEM, on a tracking tripod, with a long shutter exposure? Answer: That would be even harder to fake with enough precision to fool even an amateur astronomer; let alone thousands of them.
And yes, the Earth and moon are spherical, space is a hard vacuum, and rockets are able to work in space by following Newton's Laws of conservation of momentum ... unlike a certain magic bullet I can still recall. We need to all live longer to grow wise to all the b.s. propaganda myths we are spoon fed from birth.
Telomerase, Cannabis, and Iv3rm3ctin For All!
Worldwide General Strike and Cease Fire!
Hey RUclips! Don't ...
Funny how we supposedly went to the Moon 50 years ago but haven't been back since despite having 100X better technology.
Hmm...
China, USA, India, Isreal, Japan, Europe, have all sent multiple missions to the moon since 2005.
China successfully landed (unmaned) missions on the moon in 2013, 2018 & again in 2020 and now have a couple of kilos of moon rock back their Earth labs from the 2020 mission.
India & Isreal missions crashed landed on the Moon in 2019 (lander missions failed)
USA (one with South Korea) have 3 separate moon orbit missions happening right now.
There are 20+ more known missions including multiple landings planned by all the above and others like Australia, Canada, UAE, Turkey, Ukraine, UK, Mexico, Netherlands, Europe and more in the next couple of years.
@@rfgson
They're all in on it.
It doesn't surprise me at all. It cost a lot of money, they won the cold war, people were losing interest. There's only renewed interest coz the us is falling behind china
@@rfgson im not gunna let you get away with that comment are you hoping no one will fact check you, the us have a problem with there rocket so no they havnt gone anywhere they apparently want to send an unmanned rocket to the moon to make way for another one later on with astronauts. If they have been there whats the need for that. No one ever has landed and will never land on the moon
Exactly
In before Neil DeGras Tyson invites himself back on the show to "Set the record straight"
so joe, the earth is a pear shape and nothing to see in tropical nazi antartica
@dont tripbot It's because of Neuschwabenland. The Nazis supposedly built a base in Antarctica that was rumored to have a tropical climate. Theories about this range from Nazis discovered the hollow earth to Nazis used the base to build the UFO like bell crafts and then escaped to the moon.
DMT>NDT
@dont tripbot seek and ye shall find
Nah im good
Glad to see Joe Rogan is still a low-key moon landing skeptic
You could just say glad to see Joe Rogan is still an idiot it would be less wordy
Guess they should make questioning the moon landing illegal, to prove its right
@@godsmarine5734 this guy gets it lmao
@@kenh.5903 grow up toy
@@kenh.5903 bro knock it off bubble boy.
Stanley Kubrick was arguably the best Director ever known to Hollywood Cinema, but the man was absolutely insane. He was talking to the key grip of one of his moves while driving. He crashed his car into a ditch mid conversation and didn’t even react. He just kept talking about the movie
also a huge asshole but artists are complicated people
Does that sound like a true story?
@@IsaacTheSalsaShark fuck it, it is now - i'm telling everyone that story from here on out
Stanley Kubrick was just another horrible human being who left a mark on an Industry because he was there to do it first.
@@IsaacTheSalsaShark Lol it could be, because a "crash" doesn't mean cars flipping and engines exploding. It could have easily been a nick off of a pole.
4:41 Rogan cracks me up when his guest tries to detour from the conversation Rogan wants to have. "Nixon bombed Cambodia!" "Yeah," then goes back to his train of thought.
Calumet means peace pipe. One of the sub themes of The Shining was about the slaughter of the American Indians. Remember, the Overlook hotel was built on an Indian burial ground.
I grew up in Calumet Michigan and I’ve never heard that????However I believe there was a peace pipe with the Indian in the town mural
Have you heard Joe Rogan’s song
Elk Meat & DMT
Look it up, it’s hilarious!!
Herd that somewhere too! I'm sure it was Indian ground.
Nice catch, I'm gonna rewatch.
@@313barrygmail There's also a Calumet city in Chicago.
Remember
Salem's Lot.
There's a Salem in nearly every state. Wonder why ?
I feel like I’m listening to Joe Rogan back in 2013
only partly, usually it went on for a couple hours...this short is a let down, but a nice reminder.
Me too.
...and it feels so good
He forgot to mention NASA deleted the records because they needed space to store stuff
How about the guy who was doing a house clean out for someone and found all the copies of NASA Footage in a basement along with NASA electronic equipment. And the fucking dummy called NASA and they immediately picked it all up, and told him he could keep the old equipment, and never spoke of what was on all those reels, many claim it was all original unedited footage of moon landings, alien edits, et artifact edits, god only knows. We get a chance and anyone of us would upload it all online but this scared “do Gooder” fucked it up. Nobody knows where or how all those shelves of original footage ever ended up in that old basement and til this day NASA hasn’t said a peep about what they recovered.
Yeah, the calculations are no longer there because they deleted or destroyed all of that information? A woman Katherine Johnson who was apparently brilliant did all the math. Don Pettit literally says we can't go back because we don't have the technology. Search him on here. Is so strange that we go backwards with this specific technology with the stupidest explanations as to why.
The world has lost a ton of data and historical TV, because magnetic tapes were so expensive they were constantly reused..
But I guess we also lose a lot with hard drives, that we also rewrite over these days.. :)
watch the documentary "american moon". i guarantee it's legit and not crazy shit.
This is how you know the whole thing is complete baloney. If the moon landings were real, those cassettes or whatever would have been put under a maximum security museum and replayed every year on the anniversary. Moon dust would likewise be studied by universities around the world and handled with extreme care but lo and behold! Like the tapes, the moon samples also disappeared! And the technology to get back to the moon? Also no longer available! Because in 1969, the tech to do it was so advanced, we can't replicate it today! I feel sorry for anyone who believes all this horse shit.
After seeing how they bs'd us all about covid I've begun to question everything
question everything. Including Religion and god
Been onto these scammers since the 50's and 60's
Did the Germans really start WW2? Try why did some outfit declare war on the Germans in Mar 1933! That's why Hitler had a certain crew locked up, just as the US locked up 100's of 1000's of the Japanese community after Pearl Harbor
History is the Greatest lesson in life, never forget it
Question everything and believe nothing.
@@rickmcgillivray6154 Great start, now start some deep reading , the Banned stuff
@@velociraptorblue866 God helps you see clearly.
A year after watching the Shining I get dropped off at a fly-in remote lodge on Lake Clark Alaska in the winter. Closest community of 12 people is a 10 mile walk across a frozen lake. The guy helping me drop my stuff off asked me if I was afraid of ghosts because the lodge was built on an old Indian graveyard and there had been caretakers there who claimed to see their ghosts as well as the ghost of a woman who tripped on float plane dock and got decapitated. I must admit my mind strayed to the movie a few times in the months I spent there and wished I hadn't seen the movie.
That must have been creepy as hell 😲
that's called 'television *programming*'
Well..did you see anything?
Haha i was working in Ireland and the job took longer, sowe booked into a local hotel we found online, The Montague.. sounded cool. We arrived, looked a nice place, once inside, still looked cool.. once we were booked in and being shown to our rooms, the long very dated corridors, gave me an overwhelming feeling almost complete dankness. Exactly like the shining, once in the room, the door was flimsy like it had been kicked in, there was glass on the mattress under the sheet, I refused to stay, something didn't feel right, and I trust my gut... We left and booked into one down the road , few days later on a job, radio said the Montague had now been closed and was to be used for immigrants to Ireland, shootings and crazy shit happened there that's why was shut down . Really weird place, still get shudders thinking bout it..
I bought a house in Nova Scotia and my god upstairs it was so like the Shining- houses talk for sure
Joe "I really like that hat!"
Fitzdog "Yeah, I found it in a garbage can outside The Comedy Store, the day after the 2016 election. I had to wash it because it smelled like elk and weed.""
🤣🤣🤣
Thank you, Bill Burr 😂
@@dashiit1748 LMAO OK THAT WAS ACTUALLY REALLY FUNNY!!
ZING!!!
I see what you did there, you little rascal 😉
The Shining gets creepier every time I watch it. It’s like a fever dream that evolves each time.
You've watched Shining more than once?
Fucking psychopath! 😂
I agree... Eminem has a hidden track in his cd that you can only hear of you are delereous
Scariest movie ever
The freezer exit reversing gets me‼️
@@DougieBarclay I love Shelly
Joe “changed” his mind about the moon landing hoax when Spotify handed him the check.
Amen
No he was on record way before that saying he changed his mind but keep posting brainless shit lol probably a flat earther to
Way before
That's not true
Deep.. its all fake bro yea
I wonder if any of us bigfoots will ever get to go to space one day
Chewbacca did... I think you will too.
Us shape shifting dragons are already on it!
I will find you
@@robert4you u win
You don't exist
Kubrick was brilliant, one of the best directors ever.
Wasn't so brilliant if he died, now was he?
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 ?
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 he hated black people so he was alright by me 👍
Have you heard Joe Rogan’s song
Elk Meat & DMT
Look it up, it’s hilarious!!
ruclips.net/video/dRXTMrjJtjg/видео.html...
Joe: "he (Kubrick) was into some weird shit"
Also Joe: vapes psychedelic frog sweat inside his sealed psychonaut chamber
+p
Joe is a toad licker? I recall an "astronaut" on a talk show saying moon landing was filmed in New Mexico.
Lol
I am not sure Joe has ever done 5meo, he talks about DMT a lot, but usually NN DMT. That does not come from the toad, they are two totally different things.
@@Truthshouldalwaysbetold get ‘em King
the film Capricorn One always fascinated me
I watched full metal jacket being filmed. It was shot at Beckton gas works in East London just around the corner from where I lived. It's also where the famous Jean Michel Jarre concert "destination docklands" was held in 1989. I sung in the choir that night along with a couple hundred other kids from poor East London schools (the famous fashion designer Lee Alexander McQueen was standing next to me as we went to school together). There's videos on here where I can watch myself aged 13 singing by Jean on a floating stage lol. One amazing night I'll never forget. We had a pretty awesome childhood for poor East London kids.
ive still got the vhs of docklands show.
@@daveelson213 haha good times 🤭 the part where I'm on camera is when they walked 300 of us kids onto stage with our red life jackets which we all hated cos they smelt horrible and sweaty. I had bushy curly hair back then and was standing next to Alexander and a massive black lad that I remember being bigger than my dad 🤣 to this day I still see lazers and fireworks when I close my eyes and I'm sure my crap hearing is to do with that amazing night 😆
A lot was also filmed at ATR Bassingbourn where I did my phase 1 Army training
I had a poor Dagenham childhood which was sweet as.
thanks for sharing friend
I read the kid didn't even know he was in a horror movie bc Kubrick was protective of him
A clockwork orange is one of the craziest movies I have ever watched, easily my favorite movie by kubrick. If any of you have not watched it I highly recommend!
That movie was absolute nonsense..and I loved it
Um it is up there, but trainspotting is twisted.
@@taY_Ler-MaDe that movie was all kinds of disturbing emotionally
Fifty three years ago we went to the moon but cannot do it today? This is a disconnect in logic. The press conference is unbelievably depressing when it should be a celebration.
Fake as can be
True
@@seanpratt4704 And totally PROVES Rogan is Controlled opposition. ...the young, hip, cool, "happening" dude, that everyone "loves", ...to sell us a MOUNTAINOUS AVALANCHE OF HORSESH!T! Same with Russell Brand! Theyre both PUPPETS of the satanic globalists!
Thank you. Cheers!
@TurnedLeftAtTheRockyMountains Lost
Kubrick was the most interesting/mysterious director love his work
Love His Moon Landing Work
I disagree
Greatest 💯
My favorite movie of Kubrick is the masterpiece "Barry Lyndon". The cinematography of that movie is nothing short of amazing given the time in which it was made and was filmed with all natural lighting of the period. No other movie I've seen captures the feeling of a time period quite like Barry Lyndon (with the lone exception being Ridley Scott's "The Duellists".)
It bored me to tears.
@@Veggamattic It's not everyone's cup of tea. We all have different appreciations and attention spans.
greatest film ever made save the rules of the game. it's just unreal. thank you, mate.
GREAT MOVIE, BUT TOO MANY SLOW ZOOMS.
@@johnnyViDeO The man had just purchased his first zoom out camera, and was determined to get his money's worth. He sure got his satisfaction.
Joes knows exactly what eyes wide shut is about 😂
LMFAO
Tax exemptions?
That’s why Kubrick died :(
His homie Epstein.
I watched it. I can't grasp the point. Care to explain?
"...it's so strange that we never went back."
Except, Joe, that we went back five more times, plus one attempt (13).
I think he meant recently
“Space is the final frontier, but it’s filmed in a Hollywood basement”-rhcp
The great composers of history will live on forever. Beethoven, Mozart, Chopin, and Anthony, John, Chad, and Flea...
It’s space may be....
@@edgarallanpoe8917 🤘🤣🤣🤘
Imagine see John Frusciante on JRE
@@yuvalpeleg6269 needs to happen.
Eyes wide shut is definitely the most sophisticated of all his works.
He got killed because of it
Ever since I saw that movie I kinda got obsessed with trying to find the truth about those satanic ritual parties among celebrities and elites.
why kill him and then release it? why not destroy the footage in some way
No
That’s not even his version
Never released the actual directors cut
Joe "I'm not saying I'm in the camp... But I'M IN THE CAMP" Rogan
I was eleven yrs old and I recall the commentator explaining as the flag was planted that it was a stiff or springy material so that it would appear to wave.
Yet somehow that was missed by theorists who use the waving flag as another piece of evidence.
Joe advocated for lockdowns and masks, then he left CA to get away from it.
He’s a simpleton and easily manipulated. He trusts those “officials” who get in his head because he’s too stupid to discern fact from fiction, and therefore is not in that camp.
He would believe in leprechauns if an Irish scholar told him they exist. Remember Bigfoot? He’s an old man with the intellect of a child.
He definitely is. Joe ain't stupid!
The difference in moon walking "quality" between missions could be, yes the 1/6 gravity, but NASA even had a training program on how to walk on the moon. Astronauts reported how difficult it is, how center of mass can not be controlled, so a training program on how to actually walk on moon was started since first mission. Perhaps learning different body mechanics, not even natural at first, led to improvements(?) So the later missions do look more fluid.
The allegory of the cave
.
.
Yeah you watched them fly a tin can with 1/,1,000,000 of our current computing power.
On your black and white TV with rabbit ears antenna.
On the first attempt.
Grow up.
They also redesigned the suit and later landings had a lot more time to get used to it.
They never landed on the moon .
Have you people never experienced listening to a person relate the most intense strange experience ever in their life . They gush with excitement and can't hold themselves back from relating every little detail .....
@@Gerrardboss-v2g sure, ever see someone do that a month later while exhausted? Watch the WHOLE press conference after Apollo 11. It matches perfectly,
Also, faking it IS. NOT. POSSIBLE.
If I stood in directly in front of you, would it be possible for me to convince you that I walked ten feet away and then walked back if you don’t look away? That would be just as difficult as faking going to the moon.
There's something with a magazine that Jack Nicholson's character is reading before his job interview, I think it's a Playboy issue where they talk about pedophilia and stuff
It’s a playgirl mag, helps set up what the movie is really about regarding the real relationship between Danny and his father
@@dws0828
what do you mean with that?
.. was there incest 👀?!!
@@nlom3520 absolutely. Watch any of Rob Ager's analysis of The Shinning. Jack sexually abused Danny.
@@HunterVex.
wow, i didn't know that!!
tnkss for answering 👍
@@nlom3520 👍 Rob Ager rules!
I have never been able to reconcile the picture of the earth rising when they were on the moon how small it was -- more like what the moon looks like from Earth. It should have looked absolutely HUGE.
It looks small because there is nothing on the surface to create a true sense of scale . I try to enjoy the night sky at work . I notice the moon looking very small as I cross a huge flat parking lot , 20ft buildings visable at a great distance . During my first break , the moon will appear even smaller as I look out past the parking lot and lack of buildings . During lunch the moon has moved over our campus and looks much larger because other objects appear closer to the moon
You're correct, the moon is slightly larger than 1/4 the size of earth, .27% actually, so the earth is roughly 4 times the size of the moon and would appear as such viewed from the moon. I've argued this point for years, it's the same distance either way, but one object is 4 times the size as the other, and earth would appear to be 4 times the size of our moon if viewed from the moon.
Imagine the harvest moons we see in the summer, it's a pretty big ball in the sky, and you can easily make out craters/features on the moon, now imagine if it were 4 times that size, it would be HUGE!
Many photos/video taken of earth from the moon don't seem to show the earth that size, I've seen a few that get close, but you'd be able to see all continents easily, you'd easily be able to see the city lights, it would be such an awesome scene you know someone would of put a "web cam" on the moon so we could view the scene anytime we liked, but no one has ever done that, maybe there's other things they've never done.
Another thing that isn't correct to scale, is the dirt they kicked up running around on the moon with their toes and the rover. If the gravity of the moon is 1/6 that of earth, than dust kicked up by a toe would fly up 6 times higher on the moon than it does on earth, video of the astronauts running around kicking up dirt, shows that dirt doesn't get kicked up high at all and falls quickly back down, even dirt off the rovers tires falls quickly to the ground, "for every action there's is an equal and opposite reaction", well that "reaction" would be 6 times greater on the moon, if you're toe kicks up dirt a foot high on earth, it would be kicked up about 6 feet on the moon and it would take 6 times longer to fall back to the ground, and fine dust would be floating all over. They claim on the moon you could hit a golf ball miles cause of lack of gravity, how come the dirt/dust they kick up doesn't even go feet?
@@danthomas9077 Is there any good source of this type of information about the moon landing potentially being fake
@@danthomas9077 sorry but I don’t get how the earth can look 4 times bigger than the moon when standing on the moon. It’s 250,000 miles away and distance makes things look smaller🤔 I’m no scientist but I would have expected the earth to look quite a bit smaller from 1/4 million miles away
It wasn't just with Full Metal Jacket, Eyes Wide Shut was also completely shot in England. Kubrick didn't want to (and at that point probably couldn't) go to New York so he sent people there to take photographs of a couple streets and had them entirely rebuild as sets, lol.
That movie's budget was $65m where like $12m went to Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman and rest went to building entire streets of New York. Some scenes where Tom Cruise walks through the streets aren't even him on the set but a rear projection. I wonder who OK'd such a high budget for a movie where a couple people at a time talk to each other in a room and didn't question for what exactly do they need the extra 50 million, haha.
In Kubricks odyssey he said he thinks the government gave Kubrick unlimited access to make movies in return for filming moon landing footage.
They figured it out alright, that's why they had him killed
the end.
@@ETAisNOW yes free rein in hollyweird but after eyes wide shut they cut an hour out of the film. 5 days b4 the release he was killed. Space mite be the final frontier but its filmed in a Hollywood basement.
When you're a famous director you do what you want or you don't make the movie. Isnt it interesting how making entertainment pays better than doing things that people need to be done- aka essential work.
Its not their fault. It's literally our fault. We endorse it. We don't want to pay teachers better but we'll absolutely pay to see the next Marvel film. 🤷♂️
Imagine a world where teachers dictate the terms of how they teach. Crazy.
At least we got to see Nicole Kidman naked and for that, I am eternally grateful
The guy who stayed in the craft Would have seen the best stars of anybody When he went around to the dark side of the moon The sunlight would have been completely gone The stars would have been amazing
Yup, Michael Collins saw them just fine. The question landing deniers cut out of their cherry picked clip was if they could see the stars through the corona of the sun. Try doing your research.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing Um Yeah it would have been A 2 or 3 hour clip This is just a snippet And I am talking about what they talked about in the snippet They actually talked about a lot of stuff So what I said is spot on You are talking about something that's not in the snippet🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@UpperDarbyDetailing This is a clip from a Joe Rogan show I do a lot of these little clips Do some research
@@oldcountryboy yes… my point that flew over your head is that that snippet was deliberately cut to make it look like Michael Collins said he didn’t see any stars. Like I already said, do your own research.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing No it wasn't this is the Joe Rogan channels on RUclips they make little clips all the time Do some research
I used to play on the site where FMJ was filmed in Beckton East London.
Oof. Private "Pyle" killin himself really messed with my head as a preteen
Was gonna quote an Ermey line but knew it wouldn't get past youtube censor
Hey Joe, or your team, a humble plea from all your listeners here.
PLEASE GET Randall Carson and Graham Hancock back on the show :D
Kubrick released dr Strangelove a few years after the Gulf of tonkin proposal which didn't get exposed and unclassified until many years later... He is sending messages with all of his movies
Here’s one
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny! 😂
Um no - your wrong. The Golf of Tonkin resolution was passed on August 1 1964. Dr. Strangelove was released in January of 1964, well before the Tonkin incident.
@@whos1st the gulf of Tonkin incident started the war in Vietnam in 62, not sure what year your thinking
@@melian9999 look it up. It’s not hard to do. August 2 1964 - the USS Maddox was fired up and hit 3-4 times, sustaining minor damage. But - the Vietnam war was already underway. The Following Tonkin Resolution gave the President authorization to wage war with far less congressional approval. But the US was already in the war.
The man in charge of risk assessment for the entire Apollo program was Joseph Shea, a Ph.D level Engineer from New York. He was hired by NASA around 1963.
In 1967, his team of mathematicians, engineers, rocket scientists, medical doctors and meteorologists, nearly 30 professionals, made a determination of the chances for a successful Apollo moon mission.
Keep in mind, the NASA administrators required a 99.75% chance of success, before they would green light a launch.
Along those lines, NASA cancelled the Space Shuttle program when they recalculated the risk assessment. Prior to 1986, NASA calculated the risk of catastrophic mission failure was 1 in 100,000. After 2 Shuttles mission failures, they determined the risk was 1 in 100 or 1%. And that was too high.
Joseph Shea concluded in 1967, the chance of failure ( death of the entire Apollo crew) would be 95% per each launch. At least 10 crews, he concluded, would die before 1 landed on the moon.
That was bad news for NASA.
They had already spent more than $25 billion of taxpayers money into what was clearly a lost cause.
By 1968, the clock was ticking.
In April 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001 A Space Odyssey. As luck would have it, the high IQ genius who had helped Kubrick over the past 4 years, to make that movie, was Arthur C Clarke.
Clarke was a key advisor to NASA and friends with the very top NASA people in the Apollo program. He is seen in photos with top NASA administrators in the mid 1960's in London.
According to the film producer, Bart Sibrel, ( hated by NASA and trolls on all message boards ) he was leaked information that a staged moon landing was done in New Mexico at an Air Force base, under the eye of LBJ and other top military and gov officials.
It appears the editing of the film took a long time and might not have been completed until mid 1969.
What is important to note about Stanley Kubrick is that he had invented the Front Screen Projection film technique of backdrops, and it is obvious NASA folks used that film technique, to make black backgrounds in the scenes. Today, it looks very fake but NASA had no other option at the time and never guessed the film would be viewed millions of times by independent researchers.
The Bart Sibrel film - " A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon "offers proof after proof of the hoax. It can still be seen on YT.
One question folks will often ask, after seeing the Bart Sibrel film is, " If NASA faked the moon landing, wouldn't Russia would tell the world ".
That is a good question. Consider what Russia would get from that worldwide statement. Nothing.
Russia is smart. After all, they were 4-5 years ahead of NASA when they ended the moon mission program, after realizing the radiation barriers were IMPOSSIBLE to penetrate.
Russia was way too smart than to yell, " America is lying."
They blackmailed Nixon.
Some of the blackmail payoffs are known because they were too big and too obvious to hide from anyone. However, there is a good chance a lot of the blackmail package remains secret, and perhaps 90% of it remains unknown. But that is why Russia kept quiet in my view.
Military base 'Cannon'.
Director...Emeneger.. .
@@paolojoosten6353 Ok, got it. Thanks.
@@maxsmith695 A former military police man in his death bed , tells his son about the making of the 'moon landing film at Cannon.
This son who is now on in his death bed , terminal sick , tell this on camera.
At Cannon , 2 hangers became one big studio.During that time renovations were going on.
The trucks with props like sand did not stand out.
This MP was given a list with 15 names.
These people only , han entry to the studio.
Among them...:
Emeneger , Armstrong , Van Allen , Von Braun... .
Do you think this is legit?A hoax?
By the way..English is not my first language.. .
I am Belgian.
@@paolojoosten6353 moon landing is 100% a hoax. The confession is real. LBJ declared in May 1968, he was not running for President in Nov 1968 election. He would not be in office in jan 1969, so he was not too worried about the moon landing hoax. Nixon is likely the person who gave the permission of NASA to fake it. Nixon was very unpopular in the summer of 1969 for carrying on a war in Vietnam nobody could explain. I was in a campground the day it was made public, July 20, 1969. Many campers had a radio and listened. Afterwards, nobody bothered to even talk about it. Back then, most people, maybe 99% assumed it was real. By 1985, a growing voice was saying it was fake. After 1995, videos on RUclips began showing all the fakery and professional photographers said it was fake. Those 12 men who say they walked on the moon were kept away from public audiences. Only Bart Sibrel and a few others were able to bring forth a lot of evidence that it was fake. Today in America 75% of adults call it fake.
@@maxsmith695 Okay.Thx.
Have you seen the video of the astronaut saying they recorded over the tapes of the original landing? And the reason they haven’t gone back is because they destroyed the equipment when they returned and it would be “too expensive and too much work to build again.” Yeah, even though our phones have more power and capability than the computer when they “landed on the moon.”
China just went to the dark side of the moon… the reason we never went back is ther is literally nothing there… only thing we learned is that our moon used to be apart of earth… therefore they have more solid evidence on the origins of the moon…
How do they explain no other country going to the moon since. If it was possible to do with 60's technology there would be rich people today doing their own private trips and every nation with a space agency would have a flag on the moon
I have to say those statements made me question. Also one of the Nasa astronouts also said wr cant go cause Van Allen belt and I was like but didnt you do through before, i dunno the whole thing is wierd.
@@warrenplatinumstein7723 Actual space travel is extremely expensive and dangerous. There’s nothing of value on the moon.
There’s nothing in Arizona but there’s military bases there
He was the greatest director that ever lived to be sure. There are other greats, but his work stands alone.
Loved fmj
Mw
No
Ok whatever you say.
Are ya fookin nuts, mate?! You clearly don't know much about cinema...
Agreed. These other commentators are clueless.
It’s funny that they didn’t know about the radiation belt when asked and there space suits didn’t have any protection 😄
NASA discovered a third belt in 2011 kinda wonder why Apollo didn't discover it in 1969.
@@wesporter2176 That’s simple, things does exist until you discover them
@@dorianoddi3452 So... why didn't Apollo discover the third belt they have radiation monitors right?
they did know about them the belts were discovered in 1958. and in 2012 2 dedicated probes were sent out to study them. Their suits absolutely had radiation protection because the sun emits radiation. Solar winds affect the belts and i believe only in "space storms" can the belts be dangerous.
@@wesporter2176 3rd belt was temporary and they knew about the belts in 1958.
Stanley was a genius and his movies snitched everything in this world and ever took planes when he ain’t want too
2001: A Space Odyssey is a decent indication of what Hollywood special effects could do at the time - and it’s extremely shonky. It genuinely was simpler to film on location.
Aeronautical Engineer/scientist, Albert Taylor, spent almost two decades evaluating satellite system designs & multiple government classified programs (including the Star Wars & the F-117A Stealth Fighter programs) at major aerospace companies in southern California. This lead him to be hired by NASA to work on the International Space Station Program. When he was asked by Art Bell about the moon landing, he replied: "When I saw the landing craft, there is no way I would ever get in that thing. It was way too flimsy."
He seems to be a guy who abandoned his training and went of into the land of woo-woo crazies.
I wouldn't either. Those Astronauts were braver than I could ever be.
That's why the astronauts who flew in those things had to belong to a generation of men that I don't believe we will ever see again...
@@mattthelearner2797 romanticization to the extreme. People take on more crazy odds everywhere everyday around the world.
@@misterharryman Not to the extreme, to the amount that is worthy of the achievement.
Every time Joe talks looking up he's talking to his DMT elves
Bruh 😂😂😂
😄😃
Funny
I keep asking my DMT elves to bring me pizza but they are no fucking use at all.
Kubrick knew something. That's why he died right before Eyes Wide Shut came out. That's story surrounding that is wild.
@MMA vs BOXING I'VE LITERALLY READ THIS ALREADY BECAUSE OF YOUR SPAM. I DONT BELIEVE IT. I BELIEVE THEY BELIEVE IT.
@MMA vs BOXING sounds like Saint Germaine.
He is an immortal with strong ties to the original royal families.
Sometimes he pops up in history just to troll people because he is bored.
Somewhere that cut 8 minutes of the film is hiding, locked away. We'll probably never see it.
@@pointmanzero st. Germain is an interesting thing to look into. Perhaps Perhaps trickster spirit
@@DIVISIONINCISION you think it's protected or was just destroyed?
“Space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement.”
🌶
Do you believe Alderaan is real too?
2001 was released before the first Apollo landing and Kubrick's depiction of the Moon's surface differs greatly from its appearance in the Apollo footage. The movement of characters on the Moon in 2001 differs from that of the filmed movement of Apollo astronauts, and does not resemble an environment with 1/6 the gravity of Earth.
dude stop spaming. you are having the opposite effect of what copy pasta you are doing.
Gee, a TV show about exploring “space, the final frontier” was made in Hollywood. Totally mind blowing!
Conspiracy theorist pick-up line: "You look familiar, have we met before? I'm serious, who sent you?"
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny!
33 likes
Kubrick wasn't weird, just original. He was just one of the few that let his real ideas come out. Some people have these type of ideas in their brain that are too afraid of letting it out 100% because the fear of what others think. Kubrick just didn't give a shit and that's what made him famous.
No he was on the spectrum for sure. There's being a perfectionist then there's OCD and being a sociopath. He literally didn't care he mentally destroyed many actors who worked with him. Shooting a scene a hundred times in a row is obsessive compulsive behavior especially when there's tons of documentaries showing the inconsistencies in his scenes and things he shouldn't have missed if he shot a scene a hundred times and was a perfectionist. He had OCD and focused on the wrong details. He made great movies don't get me wrong but you can search up all the scene inconsistencies yourself.
@@dontcare7086 na he’s original! facts!
@@dontcare7086 ocd 🤷🏾♂️ he was a perfectionist and exposed a lot of shit! They killed him off !
@@talkwithdev2004 literally everything he ever made was based on a book, except the first movie he did, he didn't write it though
About 30 minutes was cut out of Eyes Wide Shut, and Kubrick "died" after he showed his cut of the movie to the studio.
Must have been pretty bad
Apparently it was a 8 minute segment of his cut that started a huge argument between Kubrick and the exec's.
There's enough symbolism in Eyes Wide Shut to understand what Kubrick was saying. It's true. These people run the world.
@@DIVISIONINCISION in the movie, the way they knew everything Cruise's character was up to, makes me think they were an intelligence agency. Or had ties to.
That movie was Kubrick telling the world that the world is run by a cabal of satinists
@Frank Dux Funny because the whole Epstein thing had me immediately thinking about Eyes Wide Shut.
Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz recounts these simulations in his book, Failure is not an Option:
'In the late 1960s our simulation technology had progressed to the point where it became virtually impossible to separate the training from actual missions. The simulations became full dress rehearsals for the missions down to the smallest detail. The simulation tested out the crews and controllers responses to normal and emergency conditions. It checked out the exact flight plan, mission rules, and procedures that the crew and controllers would use for a later flight.'
In 2003 History Channel documentary of the same name: Kranz said: The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission.
That is actually what I have said and thought about Apollo 11. Once I saw a picture of the training facility and you couldn't tell the difference. I also am aware that many false flag events happen with simulation training so the others can't tell the difference of what is real or not such as 9/11 and the London train bombings.
Yeah that means projecting digital coordinates and flight paths, not Pixar type shit.
Except gravity. lol
Dat 2 year old walking up the stairs in the hoax thing
So they think they went but they didn't??
The moon is not in deep space. Deep space is outside the magnetic field of earth. The Moon is within the magnetic field of the earth. Humans has never been outside earths magnetic field.
Thank u
J Hernandez yes increased chance of radiation exposure. Trip wouldn’t be impossible but far harder than going to the moon
It's effectively outside of the earth's magnetic field. It's absolutely tiny at the point where the moon is, it's not protected from the solar wind and charged particles.
There is no proof that man has left our magnetic field, but there are stories of black project space force soldiers telling there stories about going places outside our solar system. Anything is possible. Believe it, or not...
@@sleepycrusader8871 za
Joe "Do you know he would do complex mathematics in his spare time" Rogan
I'm so tired of that quote...
Preston "I'm so tired of that quote...." Horner
@@IrvRat1982 I’m so tired of that nickname…
Preston "@IrvRat1982 I'm so tired of that nickname..." Horner
Bla bla bla
The fact they lost the telemetry data is all you need to know, how is that even possible... Was it not important enough ? ?
Right, it's a legitimate "how could this possibly happen?". We somehow never lost any data regarding nukes -_-
"And we can't replicate it oh no ! Oh gosh ... well its lost forever 🤷♂️"
Following your shit logic they could just fake the "tElEmEtRy DaTa" and you wouldn't know.
@@TitusAzzurro I think the ointment is on aisle 5.
NASA's transparency in disclosing the lost tapes lends more credence to the authenticity of Apollo, not less. After all, if the missions were all fake, then the telemetry tapes were faked too, if they even existed at all. Any subsequent drama about them being "lost" would therefore be moot.
There is one piece of evidence that proves what we saw televised and in photos was not filmed on the moon, and it is irrefutable. The lunar lander had a rocket engine pointing straight down in the center underneath the craft with 80,000 lbs of thrust they had to use to set down. It would have made a crater bigger than the lander itself and would have thrown up so much dust it would have been everywhere. Yet, the dust under the lander is undisturbed, no crater, no dust, even the gold foil on the feet of the lander are shiny and clean. They may have gone to the moon, but they didn't do it in that ship or in those photos.
The thrust of the vessel is not turned up to 80k lbs the entire descent. As the lander descends, the thrust starts at a full burn to reduce the speed of the lander and take it out of orbit. The lander then slows its speed down gradually, both vertical speed AND its horizontal speed (it just left an orbital velocity of ~2,040 miles per hour). As the lander uses up fuel (which is heavy and a significant majority of the vehicles total mass) the lander also becomes significantly lighter, as the entire vessel is designed form the get to to have utilized almost all of its fuel before landing so it weighs less and then requires less fuel expenditure for the finer adjustments in the final descent (hence there is a "point of no return" window during initial descent). As the landers speed becomes slower, it requires less and less thrust to maintain that speed. By the time the lander has began its final descent window, the lander is only moving at 1.12 miles per hour (0.5m/s) and given its current mass at the time of touchdown only required a little bit over 1000lbs of thrust to maintain the ~0.5m/s speed for a safe landing. When you consider that the landing module had a max thrust output of 45000N and 1000lbs thrust is roughly equivalent to 4,448.22N, the engine was firing at only 10% of its power.
In addition to all of this and you can visually observe exactly where the minor amount of rocks/dust were displaced in a line along the path of its last few feet of landing (the lander was still moving horizontally before touchdown) in many of the photos of the landing site (i can link you the one you can see it the clearest on if you would like)
(and some math too)
Apollo stack, LM + CSM = 46 tons, only the LM landed on the moon.
LM had two stages, ascent (get crew back to command module) and descent (the thing you said needed 80k lbs of thrust).
Ascent stage had a mass of 4.7 tons fully fueled
Descent stage had an empty mass (fuel used up) of 2.0 tons
Total landed mass of the LM was 6.7 tons.
It had a mass of 6.7 tons on landing, and since lunar gravity is 1/6th of Earth, only ~1.1 tons of thrust was needed the last 50 meters before landing
Blue Ghost Six brought the receipts. lol
That was definitely faked nasa is pretty much one of the biggest scams that ever happened the reason they never go back or plan too is now they understand with the type of cameras that exist now you can see everything too perfectly clear it's easy too fool a bunch of people with blurry images now that we can really see what's going on they domt dare take images of the moon with these modern cameras right but people are still stupid enough to believe this happened
LOL!
@@marettmrc I think most understand there was a throttle. The spirit of his assertion still stands. There is so much more to that piece of footage as well. All of it, everywhere has problems and the footage of the trip is one of the biggest challenges to NASA's credibility. Pivot points of men in 'space suits' lining up exactly where cables would be used in their training, some footage slowed down for effect and the jump heights are no different than a person on Earth, other times they are jumping higher. People literally receiving help from cables getting up after having fallen over, There's bullshit everywhere, even the 'Moon' rock that Neil Armstrong gave to Amsterdam was fake. It was petrified wood.
The Shining makes passing references to genocide and past evils because the hotel is evil and seems to suggest evil is cyclical, at least with Jack’s appearance in the end photo. Kubrick loved to hear people’s interpretations of his films, but would rarely state his intentions. He put a lot of thought into each shot and what went into the frame.
Final Scene: the pick of Jack in ballroom July 4 1921=Federal Reserve Cronies Celebrating their take over of America via their Puppet Woodrow Wilson, their profit off WWl and their plan to make the US and its citizens permanent Debt Slaves w/ their plans for the Great Depression soon to follow...
Ehhh? It was based on Stephen Kings novel
@@MA-qe2sn Rob Ager on RUclips makes interesting videos on hidden themes like Gold and the Federal Reserve in The Shining. I’m sure you have seen it. Very interesting
Still waiting for that poor camera guy that filmed the "shuttle" taking off from the moon to be rescued lol
Look up
Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones
It’s hilarious!!
no one ever wants to talk about that lol but it's a "conspiracy theory"
how about i can lose a call on my cell phone a mile away from the person im talking to but they can make a clear call to the whitehouse from the moon
donnie brasco Is this a serious question?
@@donniedoesdishes exactly. back when we had rotary dial phones...
Have you seen the press conferences the astronauts gave when they returned to earth? They look so depressed it's unreal. Shouldn't they be smiling ear to ear after the adventure of a life time? Something is definitely off.
hockey pockey ice cream
I seen that presser !! Was odd as hell
Because they lived a lie that is why they looked so depressed it was all a set up a propaganda stunt.Put your hand on the bible you went to the moon gentleman? None of them did.
link?
should be!!!! but people would always create complaints to cover it
Stanley Kurbrick died just before the release of Eyes Wide Shut. Kubrick died 19 years after The Shining
Chris, Kubrick died on March 7th,1999. Eye's Wide Shut release date (July 16th, 1999). As for July 16th, that was the 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Launch, (July 16th, 1969.) As for Kubrick, his death, (March 7th), was 666 days before January 1st, 2001....
At any rate, we have Kubrick, Apollo 11, Eye's Wide Shut, & 1-1-2001 ( The 666 days.)
Back to ''The Shining'', (which is also about Elites.)
In a scene showing an overhead view of the Maze, if you look hard at it a certain way, you can see what looks like the numbers ''444'', right in the center of the Maze. As for the movie, The Box Office Sales for The Shining came in at $44.4 Million, (444.) Between Kubrick helping NASA, we have the Elites, Child Sexual Abuse, (In both The Shining & Eye's Wide Shut.) And also a lot of Numerology, all tied together...
Me after watching 2001:
My dad: well, what did you think?
Me: dad... I feel stupid
You watched it with your dad?
you need to watch it at least 3 times it worked for me
@@altergreenhorn definitely. I’ve seen it countless times since and it is by far my favorite movie of all time. Even got to see it in the theaters at a special showing and oooooh my god!
I just wasn’t used to having my mind fucked like that at the time haha
@@craneo7905 I watched this movie when I was a child with my father who loves it. I don't get why that would be strange, most parents show their favorite films to their kids
@Peter Thorne your dad showed you this movie when you were a child? what’s wrong with your dad.
hahaha i respect tf outta joe for STILL keeping it free flowing, informative, and pretty funny.
bot
Yeah, they shot Full Metal Jacket - the Vietnam scenes - were shot in East London with palm trees 😂 Based Kubrick
Was that “The isle of dogs?”
@@aaronalder4796 I think so
First part was definitely filmed in Paris Island
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny!
Doocklands before they pulled it all down.
I like this type of conversation that Joe was talking about. It's fascinating. If only Stanley talked about why he did that. Did anyone ever interview him about it?
Nobody ever did because Stanley did not and COULD NOT possibly have faked Apolo.
Al you have to do is watch his movie"2001"; His rendering of zero-g, and of the Moon do not look like the real thing.
NoboDy had either the technology or the knowledge to fake Apollo; NOTE THAT TO THIS DAY, NO CONVINCING SIMULATION OF THE APOLLO LUNAR SURFACE EVA'S HAS EVER BEEN MADE.
Do you think that poorly made one was done purposely to give more virility to the moon landing?
@@1carpentrys No. I think Kubrick did the best he could with the technology and information he had, and he succeeded in making one of THE best movies ever made.
I also think it is perfectly obvious, for reasons too numerous to even list, that Apollo was not faked, and certainly not faked by Kubrick.
Kubrick was an absolute perfectionist and demanded no restrictions on the process and the content of his movies. Some claim he ran into some G intemperance when making Dr Strangelove and 2001. Some say he made a deal with the G to produce something in exchange for free reign.(Later NASA gave him a unique lens to film Barry Lyndon). It was a deal he forever regretted which why he put all kinds of hidden clues in The Shinning...Danny's Apollo 11 sweater, Tang on the storage shelves, A11 work and no play etc. Some say it's why he made Eyes Wide Shut as an expose (we didn't get to see Kubricks intended/uncut version as he died suddenly right before it was released).
Clicked faster than NASA erased the original moon landing tapes
Why would they do that?
@@goead ask em
@@goead Because there was more than enough footage of the original landing so they reused the tapes on other missions. For whatever reason, maybe they were cataloging missing stuff or something, they put out a request to see if anyone had them laying around which started a search through the archives and they concluded it was reused. It wasn't a big deal but people go "ermaghed they lost the tapes".
@MMA vs BOXING Stop shilling this crap, top review of the book is: stop spamming this book in the youtube comment section
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD - “More than enough footage”. Who are you kidding? Probably the most important event in human history and they have too much footage of it? What a joke.
I’ve heard the Library of Congress is an absolute disaster, and everything is misfiled and all over the place, so I could believe an American organisation screwed up, but not that they deleted it because they had too much footage.
Happy Wednesday guy's! From Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Happy Wednesday from Manchester 🇬🇧
Happy Wednesday from South Africa
Happy Wednesday to you too
From Modesto Ca.
Thanks guys but no one cares where you are from
@@JonnyAbs-0 Much love to you brother - I hope you have an awesome Thursday
Kubrick is such a great director most people don't know he is also their favorite actor
Wdym
Sir what are you smoking?
@@southlondon86 😭😭😭😭
⁉️ What actor?
@movid he once went to the moon playing the role of a guy named Neil Armstrong just to get a feeling for what it would really be like when he had to fake the moon landing in nevada. Nasa said the budget was too high and kubrick said fuck nasa because If you want a job faked right you gotta make the experience as real as possible. So he took a team of researchers to the moon then brought back moon rock for props in nevada. Of course they had to be marked with stage letters to set them apart from the regular nevada rocks. He didn't realise the whole of nevada was a stage so naturally all the stones were marked so they lost the real moonrocks. Eventually they had to go back to the moon to get more moon rocks to fake a moon landing in nevada, all so they could pretend a team of scientists went to the moon and finally let some nerds get some tang.
Hay joe I love to watch your podcast. I learn a lot thank you. Sandy
I would love to hear Joe’s takes on Kubrick’s movies for once rather than the same filler stuff we hear every time. “Did you hear how Kubrick faked the moon landing? Did you see the carpet in the Shining?” Or “he was a weird guy.” I really don’t know if I’ve ever heard Joe discuss what he likes about his movies or what has stuck with him over the years. I don’t think I’ve ever even heard him say that Kubrick used a aperture lens that was used by NASA to document the dark side of the Moon in Barry Lyndon and how that could be evidence for the silly fake moon landing theory. It’s always just 2001 or the Shining.
Because no one listens to Joe Rogan for movie reviews.
We never when't back?? Really THATS WHY YOU DOIGHT IT???
Joe’s English accent killed me 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
2:24 for those interested
Moon landings - first time in human history when a super successful engineering feat
was followed by just stopping completely. Then they have the balls to say they want to go to Mars. LOL.
They went 7 times
Good do know you can catch that before the kgb LOL.
Theres was wikileaks footage showed that the moon landing was shot in the nevada desert
@@rileymerritt8898 nine times if you include Apollo 13
@@deafbyhiphop said, " There's was Wikileaks footage showing that the moon landing was shot in the Nevada desert.
Not True "The film clip you're referring to was taken from the production of the 1978 movie Capricorn One, which tells the story of a badly faked human mission to Mars... WikiLeaks had no involvement whatsoever! and has no files on fake Moon landings. All the information leaked by people holding governments accountable, all admit to finding nothing about fake Moon landings. We landed on the Moon.
Calumet was an Indian Tribe, also a city in Northern Michigan it was the name of a baking powder in the pantry in the Shining.
@TurnedLeftAtTheRockyMountains Very true! The outside of it was Timerline Lodge at Mt.Hood Oregon, but the interior was? I'm not sure. peace.
It's also a VERY Mega Important term in Secret Masonic Practice..., I daresay.., Friend to Friend .
The Shining is one of my all time favourite movies. What a classic.
I just about crapped myself when I watched the Shining.
Jeremy, nobody cares.
@@iz2043 you disgust me
@@CCitis shhhhhh
The book was infinitely better
#1 thing for me is when I look up at the sky at night, even with all the light pollution where I live, even with the thicker atmosphere, dirt, whatever else... I can see stars everywhere. When I look at both the moon landings and the live space station feed (anyone can watch it publicly)... where are the stars??? Without the atmosphere getting in the way, they should be brighter. Instead it's pitch black everywhere you look. I'm sat watching the live cam right now. Who turned the lights off?
I live in a moderate urban area, and only a handful of stars (talking a dozen or less) are visible on most nights. You underestimate the amount of light reflected off the surface of the earth, and more importantly the subsequent adjustments in the camera lenses in order to have a proper image. Same reason your cellphone can't take a photo of all the stars in the sky if there's a light source nearby: cameras have less bandwidth than the human eye.
They say that everything was very bright there, so they had to adjust the camera and it turned off the stars
The astronauts were in the light of the sun and the camera exposure could not pick up the smaller light from the stars.
Imagine looking up at the moon and believing that some boomers went up there, drove a golf cart, and then nasa “lost the technology.” Or even just imagine believing the government tells the proles the truth.
LOL exactly!!
YOU GOT THAT RIGHT. SO MANY CONSPIRACIES; SO LITTLE TIME; SO MANY SHEEPLE.
NASA didn't lose the technology. only not believing something because the government says it is ridiculous. Especially in the context of the cold war, wouldn't the Soviets do everything to dispute that it happened, had it not? Then why didn't they say anything? It's almost as if they came to the conclusion it was real too. There are so many logical problems with the moon landing conspiracy theory. I bet, if the government told you to breathe you would do everything to prevent yourself from breathing.
You must think boomers are everyone born before you
Not sure about the moonshots yet I do recall laughing at our American traits when after the initial landing it seemed like within a few months we had a dune buggy up there tearing up the regolith like a boss. So typically American, faked or not.
If anyone could have faked the Moon landings then Stanley Kubrik would probably be the man to pull it off.
Fact
The funny thing is that everyone says this, but it's not quite accurate. He would be the guy you would want to put it all together - well, except that you would have some very intense moments with astronauts gripping the side of their seats and their eyes rolling back in their heads. But all joking aside, the guy you would want would be DOUG TRUMBALL. He is the ONLY one who could have pulled it off. But even with Trumball's genius, the effects would suffer the same fate as all FX of the time - the fact that they don't age well. As much as people may argue, this simply hasn't happened with the moon footage. Otherwise, we would have movies at that time with that level of "FX" in them. We don't.
Oh it's more than idle speculation. The story I heard is that when he was making Dr Strangelove....he needed to recreate the bomber/cockpit for filming. He went to the G and asked for access. DENIED! He then proceeded to scrounge up every photograph in LIFE and LOOK mags and any source he could locate with any partial pictures and perfectly recreated the plane on his own. This is what put him on their radar.
@@dvnobles Kubrick got himself on their radar when he reconstructed a bomber perfectly for making Dr Strangelove. Later NASA gave him a one-off lens to film Barry Lyndon in candlelight. BTW - have you seen i pic of the lunar module lately? That "tech" didn't age well. It looks like it was made from a child's Erector Set and a roll of tinfoil.
@@ARUclipsUser12345 what, the moon landing? haha. ok.
Well "experts" still think that covi was born in a wet market.
Yea no chance it came from a lab funded by the NIH....
Title: *"2018: Fauci on resuming gain-of-function research funding. Its just as Rand Paul said"*
ruclips.net/video/BXB-Nt5kV1U/видео.html&ab_channel=SILVIEWmedia
Riiiiggghhtttt
the weirdest thing was a nasa guy saying we have lost the technology to go to space. my phone has more processing speed than the entire nasa complex back in 1960
IDK. I’ve watched that clip, and IMO, I read his statement not as “we can’t ever go back” but as “we don’t physically have the technology and would have to re-engineer it all” which is true. Just my thoughts. There is plenty though to leave one wondering…
@@coderexe30
Yep.
Dumb people like to take the words outta context.
A few of the reasons we haven’t gone back is money.
People can’t fathom we were in a stupid technology race with other parts of the word and there was a lot of manpower, time and and money dumped into the project.
What that guy means and others when they say the technology can’t be replicated is;
There wasn’t exact plans for plenty items as a lot of things were hand made and modified pretty much as they went.
It’s not like there’s cad drawing of all the stuff.
Most people would be able to comprehend the complexity of just the engines alone, it’s no wonder they can’t get a handle on the whole thing.
Advanced technology has always baffled primitive men.
People saying their phone has more computing power than the shuttles don’t know what they’re talking about just repeating what they heard, and there’s videos in b&w on yt from the national archives I believe showing all kinds of the technology and testing incoming which is only a fraction of the whole.
I think they say that because the technology was improvised by all the top tier scientists and mechanics and therefore not really a single plan was made.
I dont know what to think of it but thats the explaination given
I heard that too I don't understand
Missions to the Moon have been conducted by the following nations and entities (in chronological order): the Soviet Union, the United States, Japan, the European Space Agency, China, India, Luxembourg, and Israel. Russia has plans to go back this year apparently too. Thats a lot of lying to keep alive if you ask me.
I visited the Kubrick archives in London and one of the things that was cut out of the script for Eyes Wide Shut was a dream that Nicole Kidman's character has where Tom Cruise's character is crucified on a cross in front of the masked crowd. Spooky shit.
I also heard the climax of the film was supposed to involve a child sacrifice…
@@MC_1993 go look again at the ending of the movie now. You may have to go frame by frame in a couple parts but Nicole and Tom are giving their kid away to two men in trench coats that were at the party at the beginning of the film. Very subtle but very spooky lol. changes almost the entire movie imo.
Why is that spooky? The whole point of the movie is "lol look at this weird sex cult."
Sounds pretty par for the course to me. If anything, probably would have made it less boring.
That’s why they clipped Kubrick. He didn’t play ball
@@stevem.o.1185 Because someone actually had that thought and put into a script... thats kinda fucked up.
I have been a professional photographer ( and videographer) for most of my life. I never really gave the " fake moon landing "theory much thought until I saw the PBS commercial with Big Bird and some little girl with the astronauts on the moon. ... Big Bird and the little girl were JUST as believable as the astronauts.
Ah, ok. Good to know you're a professional photographer...
@@kitcanyon658 🤣🤣🤣
A few decades aga I saw the professional photographer who was one of the first to say that the photos proved that the moon landing was faked. His main argument was he couldn't see the stars in the sky in the moon walk pictures. As an amateur photographer , even I knew you wouldn't see the stars because they were too faint and with the exposure set for the bright moon surface they wouldn't appear in the photos
I suppose that they are Professional Photographers and they are professional photographers
What a load of crap.
You're a "professional photographer", but you use a fake name on RUclips and have ZERO content on your RUclips channel.
Right.
Well I AM a professional photographer, an actual published professional photographer.
And you didn't provide one single inkling of addressing the lighting which ANY ACTUAL professional photographer would do.
So you can read and learn from my post above, but I'll hit he highlights here for you mister "professional photographer.
1. The lighting is reflective light from the Regolith, the highly reflective dust covering the moon.
Those "multiple light sources" you kids think you see are REFLECTIVE LIGHT.
Just like we use in the field with our reflectors.
ANY pro photographer, would know that.
2. The stars can't be exposed in a Single Lens Reflex camera if there is also SUNLIGHT competing with them, which their ALWAYS was on the moon since the astronauts landed on the SUN side of the moon and not the dark side of it.
Any pro photographer would know that.
So I'm calling you out.
Feel free to provide your "Professional Photographers" website, or any of your published works along with your real name, then let's here your "professional opinion" on why you think the photos are fake.
I just debunked them but feel free to try to come up with some sort of nonsense.
I'll be happy to shoot it down.
But yea, you're no professional photographer. I can't even find you on Google.
You can google my name and find my work.
I tried "Kerry Prance" photography and guess what came back?
Nothing.
Here are the results;
www.google.com/search?q=Kerry+Prance+photography&oq=Kerry+Prance+photography&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i512l5j46i175i199i512j0i22i30j0i10i22i30l2.5306j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Meanwhile google my name, and you can easily find my work;
www.google.com/search?q=Chris+Weber+photography&sxsrf=ALiCzsZPnnQoGjcz_bKdhHOdst9qZI7J8A%3A1666292588247&ei=bJtRY_nTDvXf5NoPncm0yAQ&ved=0ahUKEwj5ucHOv-_6AhX1L1kFHZ0kDUkQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=Chris+Weber+photography&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBwgAEIAEEA0yBAgAEB46BggAEAcQHkoECEEYAEoECEYYAFAAWJwLYP8NaABwAHgAgAGXAYgBoQqSAQQxLjEwmAEAoAEBwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz
In fact that's my photograph in the lower left hand corner. Where's yours mister pro?
My profile on headshotcrew;
headshotcrew.com/chrisweberstudios
I've been published more than 100 times, in multiple publications and online and while I stopped practicing three years ago, you can still find my work everywhere.
I can't find a single solitary thing related to photography for "Kerry Prance".
So yea, I'm definitely calling bulls#@.
You clearly don't know the first thing about light exposure, and you are clearly just trolling to push these inane "me-generation" conspiracy theories.
Exactly. You wouldn't see them in a photograph because they were standing in direct SUNLIGHT.
Can't expose for the stars AND the sun simultaneously.
Even a halfway decent amateur photographer ought to know that.
I miss the days of watching full episodes and seeing everyone's faces and expressions. Spotify doesn't do you justice at all
Don’t we all bro
Am i getting the wrong end of the stick? You can still watch the episodes on Spotify.
I do miss the comments after though.
“They” killed Stanley Kubrick…Eyes Wide Shut was the tipping point.
Yes that "mansion ritual scene" was legit!
Haha
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny!
I haven't even watched this clip yet and that's the first thing I thought about
I have never watched eyes wide shut, what exactly are you referring to. Now I have to watch it.
I like how Joe continually peppers in the "Im not saying they faked it" statements several times throughout because he knows that people will pick out a few seconds of dialog and say "Joe said___!"
Directing is an art just like a painter, da,vinci and other artists hid knowledge in they're works, so it makes sense that Kubrick did also..
Get Alex Jones to talk about Eyes Wide Shut.
FUCK that would be entertaining.
I miss when you were on RUclips joe 😢😢 I haven’t watched your show since
Please for gods sake stop crying
oh dam ur missin out 😂
Joe said, "A thing, was never just a thing."
"Apollo Program"
Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time.
Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun.
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Art Director: John Hoesli.
Writer: Arthur C Clarke.
Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth.
Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars.