Nvidia Debunks Conspiracy Theories About Moon Landing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- Talk about voxels and cones too dry to pique your interest in real-time lighting tech? Then have a peek at this re-creation of the lunar landing from last week's GAME24 livestream, which convincingly proves that man actually did set foot on the moon.
Игры
Use playback speed of 1.5X
You're welcome.
Why 1.5x?
Best idea lol thx
Omg .. thanks alot
WARDified Gg thanks buddy for that tip
WARDified Gg your a gangster
*When you prepared 1 minute speech, but u gotta take 15minutes-
Talk like this bruddah*
when you trying to be like Steve Jobs
even when setting the video speed to 2.0 you are left with uneeded gaps
You young people are becoming more like HAL as described in Arthur's book. Human response to HAL's questions were a nitemare in lost time for him.
Instant gratification seems to be a real thing.
Oh, the book is called '2001 a space odyssey'
Just an observation by me.
Yea, tried that, didn't help. Then it came to me. The video is just plain boring.
You are the exact point. In less than 15 mins., the research of a highly advanced state of the art engineering company puts to scientifically prove the photo was definitely taken ON THE MOON, and you are bored. Pathetic.
Few small words for this guy
Few giant moments of silence between each word
Bwahhhaa
🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂😂😂😂
Savage
lmao
For em flat Earthers and conspiracy theorists to understand each word there needs to be a pause in between each word, so that they can process the info
Him saying “look, this is the actual photograph” at the beginning had me starting to believe the conspiracy theories until he said it was their computer generated one.
🤣
It's obviously their crappy recreation
@@SoulDelSol Feel free to make a better one and present it here.
Is the photos you take with your cell phone real or computer generated?
space suits could not contain air in a perfect vacuum, they'd blow up like a balloon
I'm glad this bloke wasn't first bloke on the moon, he'd still be up there giving the first words speech.
Ryan HahahH great
@Suzie.q Popcorn123 ontop of the 12 who've been there already ?
@Suzie.q Popcorn123 get well soon
@@ryansta oh no... you drank the juice... lol
Right... so convincing but yet it never happened. So convenient that NASA no longer possesses that ultra sophisticated technology from the 1960's that could take us back to the moon. People are so dumb or brainwashed or just too proud to admit they have been duped.
Creates a simulation of the moon landing to tell us that the moon landing was not a simulation. Thank you.
It is a simulation of the lighting, not the moon landing itself. But I guess you need to apply that kind of sloppiness to keep your belief in a hoax.
@@Schmidtelpunkt I thumbed up your comment cause your assumptions about my beliefs don't apply to me. I don't actually believe the moon landing was a hoax.
But to rebut your first point, we don't actually understand the full behaviour of light and we don't exactly know know what it is either (see double slit experiment) so can we really rely 100% on the results of a 'simulation'? I.e. If the data is not verified then how can an outcome based on that data be verified?
Ultimately it doesn't matter though because we're all living in a computer simulation that's going to get wiped out by a global cataclysmic flood soon anyway...
The moon landing was a total hoax, there is no need to argue. Since the 80's the United States had very powerful technology, things we do not understand but existing... however it's only a theory perhaps.
@@PrimePhilosophy We understand enough about how light behaves to be able to simulate this. Our simulations have enough accuracy to do this, it's fairly basic anyways, eg pixar movies run on this model
@@kerman214 "We understand enough.." - Isn't that like having faith in a belief?
"you thought it was a photograph didn't you?"
No not at all
Like its obviously a render
My thoughts exactly😂
lol is obviously fake
R\iamverycool
@@studentcopyofburgerking8108 wow what a loser lmao.
According to Armstrong he said “one small step for a man, one giant leap (not step) for mankind.”
one giant LIE
@@Amine-gz7gq how do ya figure?
@@Amine-gz7gq Not querying the veracity of the whole thing but the differing word....
He did, but he was supposed to say "step." He screwed it up. That's why he stumbled on the word. Do some research.
@@Amine-gz7gqAnyone who thinks it didn't happen has a brain of noodles.
So this is what you're doing instead of updating my drivers?
mine get updated just fine.
daro l “MiNe gEt uPdAtEd jUsT FiNe”
Dude fr
@@JurassicGecko hahah
It's almost as pathetic as when actors like Robert DeNiro and Meryl Streep talks about political issues....
It's like listening to the sloth in Zootopia.
lmao
It's painful
Lee Wells lol!
It came after 1 hour of product presentation, imagine how exhausting it is to talk. Give him a break, it is so exhausting to presenting a 2 hours presentation.
He has to talk slowly for low IQ people like you to keep up. 😂😂😂😂 seriously a grown man making references to cartoons proves it! 😂😂😂😂 that's why he is up there and you're on the couch. 😂😂😂
This speaker masters the art of the dramatic pause without any drama to the fullest extent.
And you know how to extract humor from context.
Speaker could play this science fiction story as criminal comedy drama in our village tent theatre every sunday
sounds like Armstrong careful answers to Repporters.
Calculon!
@@kundziabu1743 they play your conspiracy theories as background. They're quite amusing
“I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We USED to, but we DESTROYED that technology, and it’s a painful process to build it back again.” - Don Pettit
It sure is. And guess what they’re in the process of doing right now?
An absolutely accurate statement to those who understand everything "technology" entails. It includes all the specialized tooling, fixtures, and jigs; all the specialized assembly areas; special launch sites and gantries; thousands of legal contract; an experienced administration team; and the vast corporate knowledge of almost 400,000 scientists, engineers, technicians, and a host of others.
All of that is gone.
@@marksprague1280 they never had any of it, they lied.
@@sandwichman2247 Prove that claim, loudmouth. You're lying through your teeth.
You guys keep repeating one poorly worded sentence from Petitte. What he meant was "the technical infrastructure - rocket engines, capsules, launchers, derricks, plus all the equipment designed to turn out that stuff from the 1960s, has long been decommissioned, junked, recycled, repurposed, or rusted away. Also, all the people that worked on that stuff during that time have long since retired or have passed away.
I think that "how about lets turn Neil on and off" is the best thing I have heard all day
brb renaming my WiFi Neil.
Buzz Aldrin admitted to a young child Zoey, recently, we didn't go to the moon.
@@johnkean6852 nope
New Conspiracy.
@@johnkean6852 never happened cope
Legend has it the speech is still going on after 5 years
U made my day!
LMAO !
After 5years and 6 months
And still can convince me...
6 years and counting
Nvidia, maker of computer graphics and visual processing chips, they are in charge of "debunking" the "moon landing"? This seems totally legit...
Are you high?
Wrong, they are debunking the debunking of the moon landing.
And a much of no name conspiracy nuts are "in charge" of debunking the landing yet you'll never question their qualifications. Plus they aren't "in charge" of it. They did it just because they wanted to.
Some Americans are so supersticious and believe in all kind of stuff
The machines feet don’t even sink in to the dust- they would have
When you’ve been told you have to do a 15 minute presentation. But you’ve only done enough words for 5 minutes
this man pauses for like 5 mins after ever 2 words
yeah
This so called "expert" doesn't provide a single factual evidence.. I still think the landing did indeed happen, but obviously this show is just about making money out of naive people..
@@runenexman6587 "naive people" that would be you whenit comes to this
@ERIC SANDSTROM or. OR. Hear me out: his teleprompter could be updating slowly.
He pauses every 2 words because he cant handle his on bullsheeat
I searched ''you can't find conspiracy theory videos on RUclips anymore'' and this video popped up.
Lmfao.
Last week I went back to replay the videos I found and saved showing the problems with the photography and other things that didn't look right or sound right about the Apollo program and none of them would play back, and in my new searches they won't come up. I just get all the stuff like this.
@@darthvaper7157 if they went to the moon 50 yrs ago and they somehow cant go again
BINGO!
@Frank De Ruiter That's quite possibly the dumbest statement I've ever read.
This speach was a lot harder then expected and took twice as long as the moon landing.
hahahaha it took 10 mins into 14 min video before he 'debunked' anything....did he???
Underated comment 🤣
You mean the "fake moon landing" right?
Watched with 2X Speed haha
...and that's saying something because we all know how many takes
Stanley Kubrick would demand to get every shot juuuuuuuuust right :)
The initial "picture" looked ridiculously fake. Then he admitted it like it would be shocking to hear lol
im yelling
tbf this was 9 years ago 💀
How come people who've never been on the moon are such great authorities to determine if an image looks fake 😅
@@TheJDUBMedia Maybe, because the US Government has lied about everything else. And so, why not lie about the Moon Landing?
No, it didn’t 😂
"We have simulated every thing to death" quote of this video.
America: We landed on the moon!
Also America: No we didn't! It was a hoax!
Also America: Yes we did!
Meanwhile, the rest of the world: America landed on the moon.
elmohead Exactly
Even the Soviet Union, their rivals, knew that it was genuine.
elmohead - yeah, sorry for the inconvenience... technical difficulties.
thats a good point
Hum, you just said something i didn't realise. Wonder how many russians think it's a fake. ATM the only people i met who think that a fake are americans.
Too bad they destroyed the technology and lost the 4000 telemetry tapes that would prove it.
Name the technology that was destroyed please. Is it the Saturn V rocket that can be found in museums? Or the Command Module that can be found in museums? Or the Lunar Module that can be found in museums? etc
The lost telemetry tapes only contained NASA's BACKUP of the SAME Apollo 11 moonwalk footage that we've ALL seen already.
Yazzam X, I don't know what technology Don Pettit was talking about but that's what he said. And the telemetry tapes that they lost contained the real science data of the moon landings that would prove they went. I'm not talking about video tapes.
@@truthseeker6369 - Destroyed as in we can't use that old technology today my friend! Hence the Space Shuttle is now destroyed. Concorde is now destroyed. But lookup the soon to be launched SLS rocket which will take people back to the moon in 2023.
@@truthseeker6369 - Read about the tapes in NASA's own report here;
goo.gl/62FGDH
Notice it's ONLY about the TV broadcast of the first mission, stored on telem tapes. Nothing about data!
Conspiracy theorists twisted that into something it wasn't, i.e. they lied :-)
Should have been titled... "Nvidia Tries Very Hard to Prove that We Actually Went to the Moon."
Not really - they just debunk one theory. Which is already one too many for hoaxers to understand.
it should have been "nvidia dismantles the most common moon landing conspiracy theory"
How TF could they simulate the moon's atmosphere without any data to create the simulation from? That data doesn't exist lmfao
Lol he even got the “that’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind” quote wrong MULTIPLE times
Even Neil got the quote wrong
Armstrong's mic cut off the word "a". He attempted to correct the misperception, but 50+ years later, everybody still gets it wrong. I'm over it.
It was LEAP not STEPx2
That's been debunked on Reddit.
Yes, heeheehee
I remember sitting in my grandmas farm house in Michigan watching Apollo 8 circle the moon. My 'hillbilly' uncle went outside and sat on the porch and looked up and said, "there ain't no one flyin around the moon". I asked him why not. He said, "They can't get there". I asked why. He said, "the sky is in the way" - they can't get past the sky".............................................................................
All these years later and your Uncle was RIGHT! lmao
@Kevin Prager you study science?
Kevin Prager That’s not very specific.
wow.... you must be right, cause you study science!
@@theultimatereductionist7592 wow. Really? You said that? Bad enough that you thought it.
The news in 2154
NASA - "We're finally going to go back to the moon in 2160."
It's definitely not the first time. In the early 2000s, George W Bush was talking about sending men back to the moon quite vociferously.
@p r o x y I remember. They kept getting bolder each time until they were packing up dune buggies and cruising around in the deser... I mean moon.
you can't go back when you've never been there
2024
@@sidmartin8348 thats why we arent going back to Mars
This guy has mastered the art of painful narration.
Someone else could have given a whole other lecture just in his dead air
Lol
Hi dad
@dominicspencer3977 Nice one!!
NEXT video in Nvidia's debunking series: "How I Know OJ Was Innocent"
Are you twelve?
@@seigeengine
No, no.
That's his IQ.
... drools a lot.
He wasn't
Ha!Ha!Ha!ha!ha!ha!
And sandy hook next lol
Its better that he pauses instead of going "ummm" "uhhh"
ikr
He has always been a shitty speaker...makes me wonder why he is CEO.
Cam Kustka Maybe he has the money, better than him just buying a speaker though
Cam Kustka Well, there are many other tasks as well when it comes to CEOs. He might be a good leader, bright / quick to figure out things and so on. There are lots of people who give good presentations, but it doesn't mean they are smart or that they're good leaders...
Sampling Reality
LIKE ME! I'm great at public speaking, terrible at leading
NASA: You wanted our project? NVIDIA: Yes. NASA: Do this video. NVIDIA: Yep. Easy. AUDIENCE: OMG. LIE to the core.
So *10 years ago* NVidia created a voxel based lighting system and used the moon landings to promote their technology, with a demo and technology that was publicly available (you can still download and run it today!), and yet you think no-one would have spotted any deception to this day? :-|
10 years later, where are all the Apollo deniers using the latest and greatest 3D modelling software and ray-tracing technology to recreate that same scene to debunk NVidia's demo? :-)
Michael Jackson walked on the moon.
And touched it
Fact
I BELIEVE THAT THAN AMERICA LANDED ON THE MOON. IT WAS A BIG LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LANDINGS WERE FILMED IN AREA 51
@@michaelholland7952 : Owww, who's bad...
I believe that more then buzz. Since he's was depressed and NEVER would talk bout "going there" HMMMM🤔 THAT'S NATURAL
Neil Amstrong
NeilA
Alien 👽
Our lives are a lie
* x files theme plays *
U took this from an app I totally don’t know, and is not known to the whole world.
look up neil armstrong is yuri gagarin... :D its the same actor
Haha ...I like that!
Remember folks the camera crew always gets there first before the astronauts
and the lawyers, too, in case Armstrong slipped on the ladder and chose to file a workman's comp claim.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Stanley, without a camera crew ... is akin to NASA, without a starry-eyed audience.
Ever heard of a tripod buddy?
@@donavishaka5906they haven't heard of anything except being hard headed and uneducated in science, Best thing is leave them alone and let them be wrong LOL !!!!
The cameraman was the first to set foot on the moon.
True! The camera man was Neil Armstrong.
Cameraman stayed there because he filmed the LEM launch too, and Fedexed its film roll back to earth!!!
In a interview with a nasa scientist, Don Patitt he said: they don't have the technology to protect astronauts when passing through the Van Allen Radiation belt.
And when asked what about apollo program, the guy from nasa said well we lost that technology
WITH CHUNKY STUDIO CAMERA ,BECAUSE THERE WASN'T OTHER TECHNOLOGY AT THAT TIME
@@ahmadahmal2942 Well we will find out soon enough with the upcoming Polaris Dawn mission from Space X where we will send men into space further and higher than we have done since the Apollo days and of course the Artemis 2 manned mission to the moon... strange that they are continually being set back and other things affect the launches though... hmmmm lol
looking at the comments section, its just hard to tell who is dumb and who is sarcastic
Poe's law.
Billy McAuliffe Or you.
The dumb ones are those that remain unaware of the intended deception behind the video, which is that using a single photo's aperture settings to explain 3 minor issues, can substitute for proving any major issues they don't realize exist.
Stop licking lead paint
lead paint, loose a few iq points? Not nearly as damaging for him as what you do... inject aluminium and mercury into your body causing major brain damage possibly even autism...So that's done worse for your than a little lead pain for him ;) lol
I used to believe they actually went to the moon, now thanks to this video I"m all skeptical.
Liar :-)
@@yazzamx6380 😑
@@kenkaneki1398 😑
@@yazzamx6380 😑
Yes it often the de bunkers that convince you the most
Impressive - he didn’t start laughing during the presentation.
In between takes possibly a hundred for each scene before he was able to get through that scene without laughing and said humans are suckers
🤣
👍💯👏
Why would he?
@@DemonDrummer - Cause he's a lier.
Didn’t the lro and the Chinese space probes confirm the moon landings and the rover tracks
@No Channel think u can check out the lro photos and videos online of the Apollo landings
Pretty much every lunar mission that could see the _Apollo_ landing sites have reported seeing them, yes.
Yup
@@lance3748 yup , moon hoaxers are so funny
Prob trying to find meaning in thier lifes
@@Jan_Strzelecki yup
No. I didn't think it was a photograph.
I like that.
Me neither, average cgi at best. Solicit Applause!
Agreed. Sorry nVidia. RUclips is HD these days. The image looked CGI the whole time. Granted it was very photo realistic, but photo realistic is not the same as real.
Me neither. Funny how they sell it as a group conclusion, more than inviting you to reach that conclusion
The lander looked great. Buzz's boot though. X(
Am I the only one that marvels at the fact that not everybody understands these simple principles of light, reflection, exposure, etc? I don’t remember ever learning these principles in school. I just remember discovering these things on my own as a child/young adult.
The astronauts dont understand it some see stars and some do not
r/iamverysmart
Jay, exactly, some are air sick some are dust clogged eyeballs
You mus be a painter, not everyone pays attention to details like that
You seem very smart...your not a Millennial then I take it!
He has made me believe the conspiracies
Everyone knows we landed on the moon now. Have you ever watched unacknowledged it shows stuff from the government had to release because of the freedom of information act you should check it out.
😂
@@danielbennett1734 the sam FOI from australia and us government admitted that covid wasn't isolated but noooo, no one looks that up cause they dont want to,
ahahaha so true! this would fail high school science class project
we've never been to the moon period
Imagine believing the moon landing was fake, but thinking 5G towers can read your thoughts. 😄
If you are having trouble sleeping just listen to this dude
My eyes never felt so tired
Thanks this helped me sleep
Did you mean if you have trouble shitting, cose his geriatric narative will do it for ya
lol
NVidia, please stop working on conspiracies and get back on fixing my graphics card drivers!!!
You sir! Just made my day
Luis Colin
Oooooohh
I know this is probably just a joke, but the people working on the divers probaly aren't the same graphical engineers that work on projects like these :p
Luis Colin This technology may eventually make it into games, you know.
The Fifth Horseman
And what form of anguish do you represent?
The best comment I read about this whole debate about hoaxes: "We didn't have the technology for CGI or photoshop back in 1969... What we did have was the technology to go to the moon."
TheTopMostDog yes we had that technology!
Ignore this rambling, it's... just ramblings, lol.
I remember doing further classes on a bunch of different topics back in ... 1996, or thereabouts? We went over Forensics, Egyptology, Astronomy and, among other things, the art of hoaxes. We looked into how the Loch Ness Monster hoax photographs would have been done, and we used camera techniques and plastic bottles to reproduce the photograph, because that was easier than what could be done by the consumer computer at the time.
Yet, I have kids argue with me that photoshop, or some form thereof was possible back then... It's like, many people didn't even have televisions back in 1969, lol. The concept of technological leaps and bounds is a distant thought to these younger generations; my friend's father was born when there was no such thing as flight, and died after the average person could catch a jumbo jet from one continent to another.
What technology didn't exist or was in only its infancy when you were young, that would become used by the masses by the end of your lifetime? For me, it's personal computers and mobile phones. It's insane to think you can pull something out of your pocket, ask it a question, and be told something you once had to go and pick up a book in a library to find out. VR, or more specifically augmented reality, might be another big one.
That's funny! Lol
These high def photos were taken by whom? They had high-def photography back in '69?
Look at the copper-colored foil above the landing struts. NOT ONE SPECK OF DUST! NONE. That's one clean landing.
Lol
@@robertlofgran8871 No dust? [on any mission's LEM pix] But wait there's more...
No blast crater under LEM
Shadow's from all objects should all be going same way, the light is from one light sorce [the sun], would line all shadows up in a row [go outside on a bright day stand next to your house, you line up with your house]
The flag waves [over and over]
When they walk and jump on moons surface, no dust is kicked up, the lower gravity would keep dust in air longer]
The 3 cars that were driven on moon, really?
More?
The Van Allen's
We didn't go, we have not gone back...
I do not know why they faked it... but they did...
Just a quick refresher:
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University.
Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back.
After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13.
Kubrick? No self-respecting film director is going to make the same movie SIX times from the same set with black and white camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet.
Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts.
Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo.
Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive.
Can we still see the landing sites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images,
which were captured and beamed back by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the Chinese lunar satellite Chang'e 2 and the Indian lunar satellite Chandrayaan-2.
thank you
LIARS!!!
@@yoskarokuto3553 Stay away from your mother's laptop. Finish your plate quickly and then go to bed because you are way too naughty.
And because they needed the money for the space shuttle program that was already in the works as well as the Sky Lab project.
Amazing how this guy can take something so exciting and put me to sleep with it. :(
Nova Malone
Like your conspiracy theories put the rest of us to sleep.
reflects the first apollo11 conference, not one apolloists comments joy, all just whine about the bad comments.
WATCH IT AT 0.25x SPEED, by the time it ends, "Daily UBER space travel for ALL"
I sincerely did NOT believe it was a photograph. The suit looks very cheesy and untextured
By George,
I do believe you've proven there is cheese on the moon.
Exactly. It felt some average video-game's screenshot at best
And somehow people think NASA could do BETTER 50 years ago 🤔
Its astroneer
Nick Hahn You do know that we went back to the moon a half dozen times after this landing.
And all 5 audience members burst into applause.
Mmm... I think I'm going to start the "Flat Moon Society". Who's with me?
Jamin Schmitt im in
Alright, first order if business, how do we extract the cheese from the moon?
You seriously believe cheese exists?
balfemotor mmmmmm cheeeeese
balfemotor cheese obviously is a social construct
I thought my presentations in college were bad, he makes me look like a genius. Lol
The first man who went to the moon is the cameraman of NASA😁
I mean, you're technically correct.
The Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module's Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon's surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA.
@Dominic Scalia kinetic energy
@Dom Scalia The spacesuit is made to withstand the radiation. Cameras (at least the old ones) cannot picture stars. The flag has magnets so it looks like its blowing.
@@joulanjabr3258 Wrong, Neil Armstrong was asked by Patric Moore but he said he did not see any stars. Check it out. It was on RUclips
The moon landing was Stanley Kubrick's greatest accomplishment!
In the singular? So you didn't even realise that there were six missions in total which not only means that you have no knowledge of the Apollo Programme whatsoever, but would be completely oblivious to Kubrick's actual commitments and whereabouts throughout this supposed staging.
@@yassassin6425 Don't argue with druggies.
@@yassassin6425thank you
the boot looked too weird, it didn't look like a photo
+Ray People do keep saying that in these comments. But I think they are overdoing it. Remember that the boots had not been used before, so they should be as clean and smooth as if just pulled off a store shelf;)
Well, OK, a more experienced eye can catch the fact that the shading is too even even for that. But the difference is just not that big, the presenter was still being accurate when he said it looked like a photo. It is pretty close
I didn't read comments. Also the the astronaut looked weird. Like animated. But I thought it was because of shitty picture.
It's like the new rogue one movie with the animated actor. A friend of mine didn't notice at all that it was animated, until I told her. But I had no trouble noticing. Animation is getting really good, and we are almost there. But not just yet.
My problem with this is that the CEO of nvidia claims that you can't tell any difference. That is just wrong. I know it's just a sales speech trying to make nvidia look good. But it's a lie when you can tell the difference
+Ray That was their CEO? My, my are they in trouble! No company can thrive with a CEO with such poor presentation skills. The major duty of a CEO is making presenters to investors and share holders!
But I don't remember him ever claiming that "you can't tell any difference": only that it is hard to spot the difference. And it turns out for people with graphics experience, it is not even very hard.
its not that hes just stepping a a tiny hill thingy so it looks like it got cut off
I could tell instantly it wasn't real because of the boots as well. After I noticed the boots a few other things as well.
So they landed on the moon in a flying coke can? Lol
jersey boy No; they landed in the Eagle Lunar Lander
@@Astromatter Made of tent poles, tin foil and cardboard?
wayne peters It wasn’t made of tent poles tin foil and cardboard, what’re u talkin bout 😂
@@Astromatter Google the picture
Yep! Deal with it!!
Conspiracies are fun. After fooling estimate of 100,000 direct NASA employees, 1,000,000 contractors (Grumman, Boeing, Lockeed etc) and 300 million USA people. NASA screwed up and used 2 light bulbs in making the lunar landing videos.
It is lit by one source. The sun.
Yeah - they come up aces in securing the silence of a huge number of people in on the supposed "conspiracy", and then they leave out an extra light bulb by mistake.... A pretty ludicrous hypothesis, ain't it...?
Scott Hix Why do people not realise that going to the moon and producing some fake video for Apollo 11 are not mutually exclusive. When Nixon was told the film coverage would be poor and grainy he hit the roof and additional film was made in a studio to supplement the film from the moon to fully exploit the event and get value for the expense ! End of story - no real conspiracy. If you believe NASA and the Govt are cynical enough to fake the moon landing you must believe they would be willing to add some fake footage to improve the coverage.
Tom Chapman - Years ago I delved into a multitude of moon landing hoax video's and I learned a great deal about space travel and the moon landing. Yes I believe there's more than enough evidence to support it, but the fact it was questioned made me want to learn the science behind it for myself.
I've only really seen polarized points of view, you're the first person I've come across to say, "going to the moon and producing some fake video for Apollo 11 are not mutually exclusive". Well done, thanks for the provoked thought.
My favourite movie director made the Apollo moon landing television live presentation in 1969. Stanley Kubrick. The man was a science fiction master.He thought out all the correct lighting details and gravity effects and I recommend everyone watch 2001 a space odyssey .It was put out before the moon landings and looks like every nasa video they ever did ,enjoy.
We never went to the moon, the Earth is flat.
Yawn...
Nah, but your Ecg is, for sure.
So this guy uses a cgi simulation to disprove conspiracies that the moon landings were faked. Now that’s funny
they are actually simulating how light is on the moon, exactly, down to a T. This proves some of the conspiracy theories as wrong. Funny how so many who were trolled by the debunkers cant accept that new information, ie: this Nvidia presentation, proves they were lied to. Accept that we went and move on or stay stuck in the past, and be left behind.
@@backseatsamurai Your moon landing religion requires more blind faith than Christianity
Parish Bananarific chose between slavery (enslaved by the satanics) and liberty (freed by your creator)? To put em in ur words: stuck in the past (seeking truth) or move on with the agenda (the masonry satanic plan). Wake up, stare at the chemtrails and evil dust being sprayed to dumb the population and depopulate us....or do something about it
@@backseatsamurai "they are actually simulating how light is on the moon, exactly, down to a T. This proves some of the conspiracy theories as wrong"
Isn't this circular reasoning? Using the information from the guys that said they went to the moon about the lighting on the moon to prove that they went to the moon! Do you not have any brain cells left anymore to think for yourself? How do you know it's down to a T? Oh right, because that's what NASA says!!
Give yourself a cookie, you really deserve it!
1969 technology vs 2019 technology. Think about that for a minute.
A flatearther’s greatest fear is sphere itself
chuckled - thanks.
Prove it that the Earth is round, go ahead prove it!
Martin A
No point, you people are hopeless..
Dont you know that theres flat earthers all around the globe
One day everybody will believe the earth is flat. They all used to laugh when people said the earth was round.
"Be honest, you thought that was a photo?" No, no we didn't. Just looking at the boots looks like crap CGI.
ellisd82 long, slow handclap everybody, please.
Exactly what I thought, LOL.
Umm ... nah.
Honestly, I don't think we've ever seen a real " moon shot photo".
I think Stanley performed some impressive video trickery in his day.
And, I think it has been CGI trickery ever since.
Especially the ISS crap.
That stuff gives me the runs.
@@marshalllhiepler ditto
ellisd82 The planes during 9/11/2001 were CGI thats truth.
How come the black skies of the Moon contain no stars in Chang'e photos? The answer: The stars are there, they're just too faint to show up.
Right. For the same reason people in an inner city can look up and see virtually no stars...and people in the country can look up and see thousands of them. Less light around YOU and in your eyes means you can take in more light from things far away...thus making it possible to see those things.
Nah. They could use a long exposure and take a picture of earth and the stars at least but why do that? Easier to lie.
who is the first man on the moon?
the cameraman
Most of LEM-Moon-Photos are copyrighted, with the name of the cameraman underneath!
I wonder who took the voyager photos? First man to pass by Jupiter! Cause we can't be stupider!
I always had same question How in the world they filmed when the rocket left the moon. Did some astraunaut stayed .I don't think they had technology to film automatic.
@@OviaiMusic Exactly!
But...shhhhh don't upset the American Sheeples.
@@OviaiMusic you do know camaras can make pictures on their own, right? Remotely controlled, with the data being send to earth. It's not that hard
The actual quote is "One small step for man, one giant LEAP for mankind."
Alberto Enriquez they’re trying to Mandela Effect us. Fr
One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind
Daddy Donut this is what he intended to say but he messed up.
"One small step for man,one giant LIE for man kind" .
Thank you how can you have an exact scale of the moon landing and not know what is possibly the most famous quote in history
Has anyone thought about possibility of broadcasting analog TV 240,000 miles with perect clarity from the moon buggy with a couple of batteries that also powered the jeep with the body panels removed? I guess the Van Allen Belts worked as an amplifier.
You'd need massive radio telescopes to pick up a signal like that.
It was slow-scan, rotating color wheel "TV", and yes, they DID use massive radio-telescopes to pick up the signal!
@@gdavisloop 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣
@@debraolson7553 What, are you saying we DON'T have big radio telescopes on Earth?
Buzz aldrin told the toggle switch for ignition got snapped off. His idea was to stick a pen in the socket to ignite the engine for lift off. If he hadnt done that they would be still there stuck foreever on the moon.
Sounds so ridiculous it must be true ... the script writers should have been sacked
Comments are more amusing than the actual vid. Sad
Yes! 😂😂😂😂😂♥👀
I wholeheartedly agree
Donald Hoot but it is though 🤷♂️
What a crock
hahaha i thought same thing
This is exactly the kind of video i need to listen to so i can fall asleep
Messed up the most famous quote in history!😂
I’ll bet he had a great time at the office the next day.
Yup I cought that to..lol
@Paul Angeloff LOL more like 100 bucks.
@Paul Angeloff I know, I got the reference. Love that movie. Just saying, it wouldn't take a million.
Clearly he was just very nervous. Obviously he knew the quote, no one doesn't.
I Know, right!? Even my dog know's that it's:
"One Giant LIE For Mankind"!!
"We modelled the entire surface of the moon" - but the horizon is only a few feet away, just like on the "real" photos...
Which strongly implies that this is how it's supposed to look like on the Moon, now, doesn't it?
@@Jan_Strzelecki But the moon isn't a 100-foot square flat, it's a massive sphere.
@@joejoejoejoejoejoe4391 The surface is maybe not as noticeable as here, there isn't a lot to make from what you see. you can see how far a tree is here, but on the moon all you see is small rocks and dust. You don't know exactly how far you can see, especially on photos
This could literally have been 5 minutes shorter if he talked like a normal human being.
Have some respekt, he is an alien they brought from moon
Oh sorry, how unrespectful of me.
disrespectful*
Play it at 1.5x speed and it is 5 min. shorter.
*_unrespectful_*
leap man, Giant LEAP for mankind... if you're gonna quote someone get it right
Thank you!
damn right!
Its one small step for man,One giant leap for mankind
He did it twice, even. Not sure I can finish watching. Zero credibility after that ...
Actually it's "One small step for a man, One giant leap for mankind" The audio signal dropped out when Neal was saying "for a man" and the "a" didn't make it home during the cutout. ..makes more sense too and Neal did explain that during interviews.
Oh no. This means NASA used Nvidia cards to fake the moon landing... *puts on tin foil hat*
AwesomeSauce LMAO
The way it's meant to be faked
COTY
Good one, except Nvidia was founded in 93, lol
Nathaniel Smith search “tin foil” on google images
What’s next, is he going to try and convince me that Santa and the Easter bunny are real too?
No, if you had been able to follow the presentation, you'd see that it was more like the hoaxers claimed Santa would exist and this was debunked using a simulation explaining why Santa would be vaporized at the speed required to reach every child on earth within 24 hours.
The hoaxers claimed light could not fall in a certain way and the simulation shows: It can.
The moon landing is real tho
Stay mad
Everyone's criticising this guy's slow speech but i found it quite fine
That's cause no one but you has a half empty bottle next to them.
Except he’s lying, other than that its ‘fine’.
It’s all fake.
m.ruclips.net/video/urav1rQnvMw/видео.html
@@xonerate371 Yeah...no
his speech is perfectly fine to me.
I think it’s fine too
Who the hell thought the first image was a photograph?
Did you LOOK at those boots?
Frabbledabble the boots were the dead giveaway. Apollo 11: The Open Sandbox Game. lol
+John Doe JUST... NO!
+Frabbledabble yeah, what kind of debunk is that? wtf..
+John Doe hey John, nice to meet you
I suspected something was amiss when I saw the wonky boots and pixelated shadows lol.
Here's my question - When on Earth, the moon in the sky is a certain size.
When on the moon, the earth is a similar size.
Yet, the earth is 4 times larger than the moon.
Shouldn't the earth be bigger when looking from the moon?
Depends if it's at perihelion or not.. After all, the moon changes it['s size a lot too. Even so, we don't *actually* know how big the earth is compared to the moon, relatively speaking. The photo wouldn't mean anything, since it would just vary in size depending on how much background is shown . If they had cropped the photo it would have looked much bigger..
@@sgdeluxedoc - If we actually went to the moon, wouldn't we have a pretty fair estimate on the earth/moon ratio? Just take a look at the midpoint of the journey. Besides, I believe the accepted ratio is that the moon is about 1/4 the size of the earth (which, by the way, is pretty unheard of - moons are typically much smaller than the planet they orbit).
Wow that other guy's comment is moronic.
The key you're missing is that the cameras being used to take those photos are not the same. You can make the moon look huge on Earth just by zooming in with a camera. You've undoubtedly seen photos where the moon looks enormous because it's been zoomed in. Go look up moon photos and look for ones that you can see land too. See how misleading they can be?
You can't just blindly compare photos taken from different cameras or even the same camera set up differently and expect everything to look the same size.
So yes, if you were to be standing on the moon looking at Earth, it would appear larger than if you were on Earth looking up at the Moon, but remember that you are not doing that. You are looking at photos, taken by cameras that aren't your eyes.
Oopsie!
Atmosphere dude. Hola seems common core really failed so many.
Feels like high school when you need a 5 minute speech but only have 40 seconds of dialogue
I want my 15 minutes back.
To Selador 11: I can give you your 15 minutes back: I can toss you with a rapid hand motion, bringing you off instantly, saving the time you would have used to manipulate yourself slower: So you can use the time to better immerse yourself in your world-changing project.
No
well u finnally done something worth a damn for 15 mins
Me too!
I'm gonna join the Space Force and I'll come back on here and tell yall if it's really real or not
@Old Heathen All All pictures will be considered either photo shopped or taken with a Fish Eye Lens. Unless the photos support their argument. Then they will be considered real
I only want to know why they're not making the effort to go out again. Economy of all major powers has improved as compared to back then. All the excuses just seem lame to me.
My friend once you sign on the dotted line things change. Once you have been in the game awhile they will give you a little rope, but you will be on a tight leash for a long time.
Even you go back there, skeptics won't believe you anyways.
SPACE FARCE FOREVER!
How does a debunking video only leave me thinking even more that it's true?
@FanOf Dueling project much?
@FanOf Dueling time is relative
@FanOf Dueling what's your point? lol!
You are clearly illuminating your own Idiocracy by presumably making the assertion that your comment is immortalized in fact & cannot be challenged or questioned
@FanOf Dueling 'time' doesn't make truth less relevant. In reality, it adds relevance. DAH
Explain the laser reflectors that had to be positioned by hand. Or the fact that space based telescopes have photographed all the Apollo landing sites.
Pretty smart they chose to go during a full moon 🧠
hahahah nice
"Contact light"
the first words said on the moon by Buzz Aldrin.
First word was actually "Houston"...
*****
nope
"Contact" was the first word on the moon Houston wasn't
The contact probe was a springy little thing like a CB or ham radio whip antenna on a radio nerd's car, but below the craft rather than above it. It signaled being ALMOST on the moon, not being on the moon.
this guy is a horrible public speaker, made this unbearable
Put it on 1.25x speed
Hi had to play the fool . It's like a trick of the hand
1.5 speed
a "pause talker"
The worst
*grabs popcorn and starts reading comments* this is gonna be so much fun =D
"Comments are the new content."
@@princeoftheves1549 As long as they are productive, its a great thing. But often these things are polarized.
Yep
Why is Invidia working so hard to relive the 60s Kubrick film days?
No self-respecting film director is going to make the same movie SIX times from the same set with black and white camera equipment and only different actors.
Kubrick couldn't have faked physically accurate footage...
Epic fail.
Sure, when photographing the LEM and astronauts at wrong exposure the solar brightness washes out the stars. But why, in all the missions, dont we get photos just of the stars? It would be an awesome sight - the galaxy, wide open with zero atmosphere to obscure it. Not one astronaut just looked up a single time and snapped the sky? Fishy AF.
Stars appear no different from the moon than they do from low Earth orbit, and yet how many photos of stars have you seen taken by astronauts in low Earth orbit :-)
After all, men had been in space for 8 years before Apollo 11, with many spacewalks carried out by both the USA and USSR and some with cameras too, and yet where are their photographs of the stars?
By your logic, you should also be skeptical of people going into space due to the lack of photos of the stars. Right? :-)
Cause the Nevada sky is just that the Nevada sky !
I have viewed every picture taken on the lunar surface during the Apollo 11 mission and the brightest stars are visible when you enlarge the transparencies. On Apollo 16 one of the experiments, Far Ultraviolet Camera/Spectrograph, took pictures of stars and the earth from the moon. Unless you are an astronomer, these pictures have drawn little interest from the general public. Yes, we have taken pictures of stars from the moon.
Scroo Goo: There are literally thousands of photos of stars taken from the moon, do you have the multiple lifetimes to study them all? No? I didn't think so.
There were UFOs hovering over the craters. The audio transmissions for each flight had reports of this.
Surely Kodak film is usable outside the atmosphere protection from radiation
mmm, shielded by metal Hasselblad 70mm film magazines?
T T wouldn't even pass unprotected through the airport xrays...
It melts at 150°f.
The temp was 250° in the sun.
-250° in the shade. It either froze or melted. No film
What melts at 150F? Chocolate? The film they used was polyester based and polyethylene melts at nearly 490°F. Kodak calls is "Ester". You are probably too young to remember slide shows, but film that melted at 150 degrees would not have worked to well in a slide or movie projector.
@@TexMex421 Stop ruining their conspiratard "facts." LOL
"You can tell it's real, because it looks so fake." ;)
oh ELON that is the BESTest ! ;)
🤣😂🤣
I agree with you on this. Nassa are Liers.
@@raehughes I wonder why they lied to us!?
Der Diskutator hey you are right it look like fake to me
A man using William Shatner's acting technique and computer simulations to explain why we should believe we really landed on the moon. Great job, captain Kirk! 😂🤣😂🤣
Coward. The moon landings happened
If you close your eyes, it sounds like Nicholas Cage is giving this presentation.
Joe Falcon No, I think Nicholas Cage’s voice is deeper
Joe, that's hilarious!! Gotta love the Cage!!
Hahaha no it doesn't XD
I hear it. But a young nicholas cage
Hilarious
"Look at this computer simulation that we created. It looks exactly like the NASA footage which means that the footage is real." Excuse me but WHAT?
They did not have computers back then. The computer that took those men to moon was just clorified pocket calculator. The most powerfull computer at that time
@@vandalest Yes, they did not have powerful computers with GPUs and 3D modeling and image manipulation software back then, so they did not use them. Instead they had Stanley Kubrick and multiple decades of experience of staging movie scenes...
@@delian66 How exactly does that work? There were hundreds of people monitoring different types of data. The Australians were matching the monitoring as a backup. Thousands of telescopes were trained on the rocket. Millions of people watched on TV. If Kubrick produced the "movie" then there would be production staff, set builders, sound people, lighting - and very specially designed lights, people to run wires and lifts, costume designers, and many others. And *NOT ONE SINGLE ONE* ever, in 50 years slipped and told the secret. Do you *REALLY* think, that during the Cold War and Russia's many failures, that they weren't watching for any glitch that they could call fake?
I'd love to hear the explanation for that. Maybe Kubrick and Von Braun got down and shoveled dirt.
@@turbobrain1342 Have you noticed, that in the second "moon" picture, in this very video that we comment under, the astroNOT leg is slightly transparent on his way down the stair?
( see ruclips.net/video/syVP6zDZN7I/видео.html ) ? How do you explain that ?
Do NVIDIA have another video that I may have missed, with "a meticulously modeled" scene, where human bodies can become translucent ... may be the cause is the cosmic radiation, and if they could model not only the stars, the lunar surface and the other astroNOT's highly reflective body suit, but also the planets and meteorites, then that would be enough to explain it ;-) ?
@@delian66 Just check this out for me, please?
ruclips.net/video/_loUDS4c3Cs/видео.html
If I could send a probe to the moon the first thing I would want to photograph is the iconic first moon landing remains.
Wow, what a completely ridiculous prioritization.
But they've already done that (imaged landing sites with later probes).
@@seigeengine Why ridiculous?
@thePiercingTruth That depends. Many probes from many countries have confirmed the Apollo landing sites.
Perhaps the best are from the LRO, whose photos show not only the landers, but even the paths of footprints the astronauts made all those decade ago.
Brought to you by the same people who brought us Covid-19.
NVidia isn't Chinese.
Original quote: “That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind”
Huang’s version: “That's one small step for man, one giant step for mankind”
Going to moon is just a giant step, not giant leap. Nvidia is a giant leap.
This quote never made sense to me. My high school science teacher told us he got it wrong and was meant to say, "One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind".
Yeah that’s the 1st of many crap comments
this video should be called Nvidia debunking accusation of NASA for using CGI.. with CGI 🤣
Actually NASA supposedly used stages in the 60s... they wouldn't have had the kind of technology required to actually simulate something like that back then. Not when a cellphone nowadays has more power than all of NASA mission control in 1969.
@Jair Bear I would LOVE to get some of what you're smoking, if you could arrange that I'd be in your debt.
The main reason we haven't returned to the moon is political and budgetary reasons. The height of NASA's budget was during the Apollo program and that's because it took every dime to fund that mission.
You also have to look at the number of staff required during that mission, sure we may be able to do it cheaper nowadays but the problem is that a president isn't going to authorize such a mission due to there being very little gain.
To believe that NASA had the ability to fake this kind of thing in CGI back in the 60s is absolutely hilarious... I think you need to take a class on the history of technology and realize that vacuum tubes were not a sufficient technology for handling the delicate processing required for such a scene.
The main point of contention is that they were faked in a movie set/stage and that's far more believable than CGI. But, with that said... it's still as silly as believing the Earth is flat.
YOu seriously missed the point? Really?
@Jair Bear "NASA claims to not have the technology available to repeat a manned mission to the moon" NASA makes no such claims, and plans to go back in just a few years, without the massively larger budget it had in the 1960s.
@Michael Wolff "Kubrick approves of our disapproval. He tried to pull the curtain off...they killed him for it"
Riiiight.
We didn't go, Blanche.
Gregory May no we did not!
Okay, so... you didn't watch the video...
Guffaw....😒
Gregory May If we had have gone, Doris, we'd have been back there again to weaponise it!
We CANNOT get through the Van Allen belts safely.
Sure we can. We can fly through in around one, two hours, when actually dying from radiation would take one _week._
@@Jan_Strzelecki NASA thinks it's not possible.
@@Simboiss NASA thinks nothing of sorts. If you're talking about the _Orion's_ test, the context was about protecting _modern_ electronics, and they've successfully tested and verified that back in 2014. So not only it has nothing to do with _Apollo,_ it's not an issue since 2014.
@@Jan_Strzelecki Old electronics were not affected by radiation?
@@Simboiss Not really, no. You must remember that we're packing around one _million_ more transistors in the same surface area these days.