Seriously? Again? What on Earth does your inability to understand a weak 2.4 - 5 GHz signal from a router to your device have to do with the Apollo Programme? Incidentally, the last manned lunar landing was 52 years ago, not 55. Can I suggest that you leave your basement periodically? - and not simply in the interest of your wi fi signal.
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies. They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
@@rossbreckenridge3322 I would have thought the rules are pretty obvious, you don’t question the “official” story of 9/11, you don’t question the authenticity of the moon landings and you don’t criticize the apartheid state of Israel, otherwise you get demonetized and/or banned.
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce. When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy ! You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings. You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space. Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit. You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth. *30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now? Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
On August 19th, 1960 - Russia's Belka and Strelka became the first two dogs to orbit the Earth, spending a day in space aboard the spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2.' Accompanied by one rabbit, forty-two mice, two rats, flies, and various plants & fungi. All passengers survived the journey as the crew safely returned back to our planet.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
we never went there. the earth is an enclosed ecosystem. satellites do not exist they are giant cords that run along the bottom of the oceans. Joe changed his stance when they started to control him. the earth is flat, it's been proven over and over with thousands of experiments. most ppl know this they just don't report it
@Zane 778 giant cords running along the bottom of the ocean? Yeah. Oil pipes, internet/electric. There's legitimate reason in some conspiracy theories, but people like you shy everyone else away from the truth with bullshit like flat earth and enclosed ecosystems
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared. The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
Is it so hard for your small brain to understand that it was incredibly expensive and there is no such benefit from going to the moon that would cover these expenses? Is it so hard for you or you just pathetic troll?
Wow, People think we didn't land on the Moon. LOL they must vote R. Funny, they believe some cat, most likely white, sits in a place they call heaven... Oh and Jesus was a blond haired Blue eyed Jew? Go to Israel. LOL
i think Joe has realized that he can't change minds while admitting he believes in it. I don't think he's sold out, but like everyone who's looked in to these things knows, you can't change people's minds if they think you're crazy.
He's talked to enough astronauts to understand that he was just mistaken. Everything in life will always seem "shady" or "weird" if you look into it too much. It's like saying a word too many times; eventually it loses its meaning.
Which is exactly why the powers that ought not be coined the term "conspiracy theorists ". Now when you hear someone being called a conspiracy theorists it automatically discredits them and people think they are nuts! 9 times out of 10 the conspiracy theories are true..
@@jamiesuzanne5781 9 out 10 time the conspiracy freak is either an ignorant clown with a room temp IQ, or a con man like Kaysing, preying on the dimwitted and gullible.
The conversation is such a non-conversation. As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe. Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world. Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
He was able to stand up like that because he was pushing himself with his left hand leaning on the other astronaut. Once you see the hand you can never unsee it :)
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
you can watch the guy pull himself up using his left arm and his buddy lifting with his prospective right arm. he's not getting yanked up by wires. just watch it a few more times, the arms lifting are blocked a lot by the standing dude, but once you see it, its obvious that the guy on the right helps him up.
mike lee look up the pictures and the video. Video is clearly fake. And the hole in the Pentagon looks like a explosion not at all a plane with wings going into the Pentagon.
If the landing never really happened, then why didnt we hear anything like that from the Soviets? Weren't they following the whole thing live?? They wouldn't have missed the chance to pick up on that
It baffles me that people think the most egocentric, ambitious and fraudulent nation in the hole world once went to the moon with that shit ass spacecraft
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Stephan Fry the actor made a great point about the if the moon landings were fake.If so then why did the Soviets not come out and say they were fake even if they knew they were real.They had their missles Aimed at America but they said nothing.The rock samples from the moon the Americans sent to the Soviets as a gesture of good will could confirm to the Soviets that the rocks were real samples from the moon.
The 'rock samples' are easily attained from Antarctica. There are a lot of them there, and they are easy to spot in a blanket of white...and it snows there very little. Also, the 'rock' that was supposedly picked up by one of the astronauts off the surface of the moon, and given to the head of some country, personally, turned out to be petrified wood.
Why we , the soviets never sent people to the moon, nor even animals, if it was so easy like americans demonsteated that to be, but only automatic equipment, think about it
With the whole “ he couldn’t have stood up like that without a wire” thing. If you look at the close up they give you see his arm is on his buddies right hand sleeve. I think it’s plausible that he could have given one good yank expecting it to take more force than actually required and it gave him the boost needed.
Honestly the moon landing was done in the middle of the Cold War. I remember learning about the space race and I can definitely see our government doing something like this
The moon landing is real, i can see why its easier and sexier to think otherwise but that operation in today dollars costed 280$ billions. With today NASA budget it would take them 12 years to amass that amount of money. Shit can be done when the Russian announce they’re going on the moon😂.
The belief was back then in 69. Stanley Kubrick had just finished making the movie "Space Odyssy 2001" in the London studios at Boreham Wood. Scenes in that movie were coincidentally very similar to scenes of the original moon landing. The story goes, as the US was behind in the space race. The CIA approached Kubrick and asked for his assistance in faking the footage of the moon landing. Kubrick "allegedly" tried to expose this deception by leaving clues in the movie "The Shining" . It was claimed this was the reason for his untimely death. ....Allegedly!
@@planetyouranus22 , no, the alleged reason for his untimely death was the film he had just finished making - Eyes Wide Shut. They wouldn't wait 30 years to kill him over the faking of the moon landing footage, but for exposong the paedophiles that run the world, yup.
If you look closely at the astronauts when Joe says "they looked like they got yanked up" you should be able to clearly spot that the second astronaut is pulling up the first one back on his feet by yanking on his arm. And when you consider the fact that it's 1/6 th earth's gravity we're talking about, it makes sense it looks like that.
Joe Rogen should really see this comment. As he said, he does not understand the concepts... Sometimes you should stick to what you know because the mind plays tricks.
There's nothing clear there don't be dishonest, there's no clarity that he pulled him up... He could have pulled him up yes but the video is not clear at all and even with close inspection it looks like he is magically straightens himself out without any grounded feet or clear exertion of force from the other astronaut
@Kelly Arthurwho said I believe in any fantasy.. Big assumption there I just want to know whether there is a clear video of him being pulled up.. Which I haven't seen, and you haven't provided so I'm not gonna just go by your word because you've " seen the film "
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back" " We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing" - NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on RUclips. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
Until there is another moon landing, I will remain skeptical about the moon landing. I don't know if they did or didn't land on the moon. Let them do it again.
Nice burn but we have Billionaires that would do it in a second if they could. Going to the moon is one of the few things money can't buy. Think about that.
Hahaha. No there hasn't. There have been ZERO. Next they'll tell you they are going to Mars, ahahaha.. ha. ZERO CHANCE. What did you 'Wiki' it.. That's good cointelpro.. If it's on Google it's true..
@@jeffmiller3499 The US was way to proud to lie about something like this. We went to the moon. The US always took every chance to flex. They had the money and tech, it's easier to say "here's a blank check. get us to the moon before the russians do".
The thing that convinces me is the fact that the Russians admit we made it to the moon and back. They would have been the first to debunk it and they monitored our first mission and still claim to this day that it was legit.
THIS....RUSSIANS SAID LEGIT....NOT A CHANCE IN HELL, THEY DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, NO WAY THEY COULD KEEP A LID ON IT , THERE WERE LITERALLY A COUPLE THOUSAND PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH APOLLO 11.....CASE CLOSED
@@B..P.. we went to the moon and there is substantial evidence for this, that video is made by someone who obviously made by someone who doesn’t understand aviation or science. Read a book and get a life.
I watched a documentary that said, “we had to keep the ship turning like a rotisserie to keep one side from getting too hot!!” How did they walk on the moon without getting too hot?
"I watched a documentary that said, “we had to keep the ship turning like a rotisserie to keep one side from getting too hot!!” How did they walk on the moon without getting too hot?" Insightful question. There is a range of temperatures found at any one spot on the moon from Way Too Hot to Way Too Cold, depending on the time of day or night. All the Apollo missions landed not long after sunrise, when temps were in the moderate range, the same temps found on Earth. I'm no authority on this, but that's what I've read and it makes logical and physical sense.
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field. There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
Conspiracy Theorist ™️ is over user. It’s a CIA term to discredit. All it means is a theory that someone or thing has conspired to deceive. Of course if someone has a theory they’re going to defend it.
@@JarodJoseph Conspiracy theory is not a CIA "term". Absolutely false. What's hilarious here is that you are resorting to a baseless conspiracy theory about conspiracy theory to defend baseless conspiracy theory. The unintentional irony is as excruciating as it is amusing.
@@harryevans1786 but it's conspiracy fact. Especially in the JFK and RFK cases now. And tin foil won't save you against the radiation in space. There was no way NASA could possibly trace an obstacle free course to moon. They were always in the blind.. Travelling at those speeds in a thin tin can was perilous and tempting disaster at every attempt. The chances of getting away with it every time would be astronomical to use a pun.
@@marisamoravec9809 Well, that's true i guess. But i thought this was common knowledge, pretty sure if i asked a 12 year old here in Norway he/she would know who it is.
@@Kay-jg6tfUSA likes to omit facts from children’s education. I learned a ton about Nazi’s in my public education but never who he was or that they brought many Nazi scientists over that should’ve been war criminals. I learned about that on my own studies as I did with many other subjects the country should be embarrassed by. I don’t think people understand the levels the Kennedy s, LBJ, etc were willing to go to plus many other high profile families of the time and during the world wars.
@TacticalTech There is no camera or film light reflecting. Even by 1968 Apollo had become controversial with the public and congress, which is one reason why Lyndon Johnson and then Richard Nixon killed anything in the future; Johnson because he was having problems with the Vietnam War and the Great Society and Nixon because he was a good politician and saw that the Moon could harm his presidency. NASA did not lose the technology to go to the Moon in the sense that it was forgotten, mislaid or mysteriously disappeared. Some of the blueprints still exist on file; but the individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost. And on top of that, much of the equipment is incredibly dated, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” but would have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better. The Van Allen belts are very narrow, occupying a fraction of the path between the Earth and the Moon. The Saturn V trajectory took the rocket through the thinnest part of the outer belts in about 90 minutes, so the dose of radiation was within safety limits. Each mission flew a slightly different course in order to access its landing site, but the orbital inclination of the translunar coast trajectory was inclined to the Earth’s equator by about 30°. A spacecraft following that trajectory would bypass all but the edges of the Van Allen belts. Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation.
It's pretty simple, cost vs reward of going to the moon is a very one sided story. If there were potential habitable areas or valuable assets there, we would have colonized and or strip mined it by now. As far as the argument of the technology differences of then to now only reflects progress. Does anyone remember seeing photos of the first contraptions people were trying to take flight with? Now compare that with a SR-71. If those first guys hadn't tried, the latter wouldn't exist. It's always trial by fire when attempting such phenomenal new feats. So the first missions to the moon were indeed extremely risky (especially by today's standards) but they were the first steps in seeing how far we could go. While I will agree somethings do seem out of place with the moon landing, (but what hasn't had things out of place when a government is behind the wheel) the fact that we now certainly have the technology to get people there and back but don't, leads me to believe they had seen what they needed to see and the results didn't yield a worth while reward to merit continued expeditions. And yes, a lot of scientists and engineers of that time were plucked from Nazi Germany. Now the video showing the guy standing up after falling, if you look his right hand is down as well as his right knee. His left hand appears to be holding onto the standing astronaut. Standing up from that position in 1/6 gravity using your right knee and hand to push off of the surface and your left hand pulling down on the other astronaut, wouldn't be that big of a grasp.
Lmao yea dude sure it’s not like don Pettit made an entire Ted talk about why the moon would be of ultimate scientific importance. Stop lying to yourself in order to just go along with what the elites that hate us want us to think. We didn’t go and it’s the most logical conclusion we can come to seeing the modern state of nasa and what happened after the “moon landings”.
@@JA-jx1hk When you read a posted reply that begins with LMAO, you just know you're in for a wealth of well thought out statements, arguments and fact.... (FART SOUND).....
Welcome to a "worm hole" as opposed to a "rabbit hole" when information presents itself to an individual that can compel a person to CHANGE THEIR MIND. (Sometimes known as "flip flopping")
@@jebidiahnewkedkracker1025 joe is more disingenuous. Social Chameleon, changes to suit the people around him while kerping hus true opinions quiet........... Unless its about weed.
@You're Wrong wtf are you even saying? China and russia have different moons? What does that mean? I feel like youre about to tell me the earth is flat next..
"I used to believe the moon landing was faked. But not anymore." 2 minutes later... "Neil Armstrong was a patsy, the astronauts were on trampolines, actually they were pulled up by wires, the flag moves in an invisible breeze..."
Also the suits they wear are pressurized so the movements you make in the suit doesn't translate to what the suit does, unlike clothes. It's like watching people dance in those fat suits, it looks funny because of the air pressure in the suit vs how the material moves. I have found that most people just don't understand enough about the world to understand what they see in these videos.
The astronaut involved claims he had the other push on his head to get up and that's why it looked so weird. I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find. I saw it years ago on RUclips so I urge people to check it out for themselves. Obviously if I had the link I'd just share it now but regrettably I do not.
@@KarthikSrivatsan-nv6qn I doubt you have made a calculation or something to figure that, it seems you are just applying how things work here on earth to the moon.
One of the issues with “it looks like the astronauts were on wires” argument is that human beings have no baseline for what it would look like to walk around on a body with a 6th of the gravity of earth
Yeah I was cringing pretty hard when they were watching the astronaut get up, they don’t realize how easy it would be to just push off the ground with your hands to stand up. 1/6th gravity AND no air resistance.
@@bsheaves I really hadn’t considered it either until I started putting it out into words lol .. that’s HUGE, not only are we being constantly accelerated 9.8 m/s/s downwards, but every movement we make is met by the force of air resistance.
@@Pseudosuga probably to keep him planted on the ground 😂 i’m sure you could easily launch yourself up off the ground a little from a ‘1-handed pushup’ stance tbh
I may be late to this, but the astronaut did have a base to lift himself up (look at his left arm on the other man's right shoulder at 16:04) with that little help up and 1/6 gravity allowing him to prop himself up, allowed him to make a winding gesture back on his feet. Based on that it seems plausible that its really in space.
I was thinking the exactly the same thing. He has something on the front of his suit which in that blurry crappy film looks like his left arm, which makes it look impossible. But it isn't his left arm. When you realise where his left arm REALLY was afterwards, then re-watch the video and imagine where his left was the whole time (you can't even see it at the points he stands up so you have to visualise it), it's entirely possible. Taking the left arm into consideration, I can actually do that here on earth. It's not easy you probably have to be fairly athletic, but possible. So you could definitely do it in 1/6th gravity.
@@stevekohl8768 are you really gonna try and tell me that you can see dirt particles moving from that 60's camera filmed at a distance from the astronauts? what are you even talking about, you cant really see any dirt
For those thinking we didnt go to the moon you have to answer the question why the Soviet Union in the middle of the Cold War went along with us and humiliated themselves with their failed attempts at Baikonur? They would have known if we faked it and even they didnt pretend we didnt land men on the moon.
If 1/6 gravity is too hard to imagine, just try imagining 6x normal strength on Earth. How high would one of those calf muscle hops or clapping push ups be with 6x strength? You can do some weird looking shit when the rules are different.
Being 6 times as strong or 6 times as light does not equate to 6 times as high of a vertical leap. It is not linear like that. The best squat lifting powerlifters are not the best jumpers. There were plenty of people who could squat way, way more than Michael Jordan could in his prime, but that did not mean they could jump higher than him. If you go on a squat program and get strong enough to double your squat PR, that does not mean you will be anywhere close to doubling your vertical jump. Trying to make an argument based on an assumption that an increase in strength or a decrease in weight will result in a linear 1:1 increase in vertical jump is nonsense. Vertical jump has a whole lot to do with how fast your muscles contract and move your limbs, rather than how strong or how light you are. The astronauts may have been lighter on the moon, and that helped their jump, but they were not able to contract any faster. So they were not going to jump 6 times higher just because the became 6 times lighter. It is not 1:1 like that.
@Mr.BigBoss7 However the suit would limit that height by the weight you have to add to the person and the restricted mobility. I can jump higher in sweatpants than with tight jeans and a backpack on.
you realize they weren't jumping around right? they had to skip around so they wouldn't trip on their feet since humans get used to their feet hitting the ground depending on gravity
The weirdest thing I have read is that after leaving Earth atmosphere the astronauts would have this 'hallucinations' is the best way to describe it. Apparently Buzz Aldrin was the one who talked about it.
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
This guy looks like an ancient Greek statue
This guy got knocked out by jake paul
Oh I know which one you're talking about....the guy with the small pee pee?
why y’all hating on ben askren
Hahaha hahaha
@@someguy6367 Its all jokes man
Joe's ability to know AND acknowledge that sometimes he doesn't know what he's talking about is something so many more people could use.
No, he's pure Dunning-Kruger
@@SovereignStatesman Dude assessed his own level of knowledge as mostly ignorant - shit, dunning-kruger means he must be one of the smart ones...
And he's the guy that people paint as conspiracy peddling fascist. Can't be admitting gaps in your knowledge - pick a side and stand up for it!!!
Joe probably has either been blackmailed or has taken the blue pill, either one is bad.
As well as a more comprehensive education and the ability to think critically.
Still blown away that Joe was able to get Socrates to come on the podcast.
Underrated comment
😂
😂😂😂😂
Ben does look like a greek god😂
Isn't he David?
Yeah, we went to the moon, 55 years ago, and I can't get wi fi in my basement.
Seriously? Again? What on Earth does your inability to understand a weak 2.4 - 5 GHz signal from a router to your device have to do with the Apollo Programme? Incidentally, the last manned lunar landing was 52 years ago, not 55.
Can I suggest that you leave your basement periodically? - and not simply in the interest of your wi fi signal.
Perhaps leaving your basement would do you some favors.
Its not the same people who built the wifi😂
What
If you think the moon landings were faked then it's probably good you don't have wifi down there
Joe “ I was balls deep in this stuff for years” rogan
:)) best comment
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 GOLD
OMG I just died! That is definitely the best comment ever
The only thing I'm balls deep in is some juicy hot box
When he pulled out his balls got ripped off.
Ben seems like a genuine guy. He actually listens to Rogans conspiracies and considers them. Offering more than hysteria.
he got knocked aht by jake paul lol
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies.
They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
Hysteria?
@@Pvtpob
That's fake. You probably used google which is jewish owned, thats why
‘There are people who think satellites and dinosaurs are fake’. Joe was 100% talking about Eddie there haha
Eddie is an absolute idiot. I cant even listen to him talk without ending the videos early. So cringey
@@andrewderringer3765 eddie would still put u in coma
@@javiii8337 No refute there. But his brain leads me to believe he's already in one
@@andrewderringer3765 eddie is right on many things, flat earth is not one of them.
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
Joe - talk to architects for 9/11 and discuss just building 7.
Joe , please don't mention dr judy wood. "Where did the towers go? "
Watch SEPTEMBER 11 THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Joe’s been told the rules, now he won’t touch it, he used to be a moon landing skeptic but….now he plays within the rules
@@Jonathan-Sundwhat do you mean by the rules? What rules.
@@rossbreckenridge3322 I would have thought the rules are pretty obvious, you don’t question the “official” story of 9/11, you don’t question the authenticity of the moon landings and you don’t criticize the apartheid state of Israel, otherwise you get demonetized and/or banned.
This old podcast's are more interesting to watch then the new ones
Just thinking that bro
I disagree, you just have nostalgia
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce.
When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
That feeling you get when you realize all the cold war was was American Nazis vs. Soviet Nazis...
our german scientists are better than, your german scientists, 😅
the way you say it has a better ring to it!!! 👊🏽😎
@CONTROL-Z nazis scientist getting america to the moon vs nazis scientist first reaching the space
Yup
That exchange was Operation Paperclip.
Sonsabitches
Well said
The cold war was more than just the space race 🤦
It's easier to fool intelligent people than it is to convince intelligent people they've been fooled.
A month later and still not a reference to the quote. I'll help you, Mark Twain.
@@pawpaw__ huh
@@gabeprice3333mark twain said the quote
@@spanningbread lol I know. I was just being dumb
@@gabeprice3333 i see, was just tryna help lol
The moon landing movie is my favourite movie.
The jumping, the rocking, the bobbing and the weaving. I love it all.😂
Yes and earth is flat
@@marcotp9 I know.... that! That's not even a debate.
@@anuragsinha2013 I had no doubt about that
@@marcotp9 Can you believe the lies they fed to us about Biggie and Tupac.
@@marcotp9 LeBron James' decision is my second favourite movie.
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@97NikeSb Very true!
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb
That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy !
You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings.
You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space.
Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit.
You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
I didn't know about operation paperclip until I was in my early 20s. I definitely didn't learn about it in school.
Joe “fear is a factor for me” rogan
Douglas Cameron lol with his hair
Joe “I say whatever doesn’t offend my guest” rogan
😬😮😬😮 Blasphemy!!
I started that and now everyone is doing it
@@devildog8427 yea cool story bro 🙄
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
I did look into it ,thats what makes it so laughable.
@@stevekon11 👌
Ben Askren is one of the smartest people I’ve seen on JRE not even kidding lol
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
Lol keep being a sheep bro 😂 the government green screened the fuck out of America and most of u fell for it 😂
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
Describing scientific breakthroughs as “removing truth’s protective layers” is actually quite beautiful prose.
but the clowns will gobble up the story if it's sold as "cryptic" and "potential giving out"
@@madlad4206 Tough talk for a man with a small cock.
I didnt find it cryptic or odd at all
Well Rogan didn't understand it. Therefore there MUST be a conspiracy !!!! Too funny
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth.
*30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
Look into it
Nothing like clocking out of work, getting in my car and driving home listening to this. Fun.
DONT TEXT AND DRIVE!
regards,
Captain Hindsight.
“ That’s no moon....it’s a space station “ - Ben Kenobi
If ur not with me then ur my enemy
@@xtravugant4245”You were the chosen one!, it’s said that you would destroy the Sith not join them!”
My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
Sus is what actually hit the Pentagon.
They knew they what they were gonna do years and years ahead. They always have a plan far ahead of when it happens…
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
Oh ya my uncle was special forces and had to register his hands as deadly weapons
joe "show me the ufos and il lie about it for the rest of my life" rogen
Sonic Spange this deserves more thumbs up
wouldn't that mean he saw ufos????????
@Jesus Was Antifa Thats not the long form word lmao. Its unidentified flying opject, that doesnt mean they hard confirmed aliens
@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero the gov are the aliens
@@anylastwordspod Lol
One incredible thing was they were able to do a live broadcasting of the first moon landing in 1969.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@efficiencyinavan for some reason I can’t get service in my master bedroom
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
@@efficiencyinavando radio waves need an atmosphere to travel ?
“You can’t get down without no base”
Great quote
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
dude knew how gravity would work on the human body if it were on the moon within seconds lol
because mma
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
2013?
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
I want this just so Buzz Aldrin can sock him in the mouth from across the table when he questions the veracity of the moon landing.
@@braulioaguilera4267 not one of them will swear on a bible they've been to the moon, if they did it would end all this discussion.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now?
Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
"I aimed for the moon, but sometimes I hit London" - Werner Von B
🤣
Great American hero 😂 w Von B
‘What the fuck was that?’ - Mayor of Hiroshima
That last clip with the astronaut standing up would be super strange if there wasn’t another astronaut there who had his hand when he got up
I love Ben he wasn't my favorite fighter for sure. But as a person he seems like a genuine and humble guy.
Agree
I will allways wonder how the fight against Mascidal had went, had he just not dived from the 1 second of the fight
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
Ben ? Joe was a fighter
Yeah but China confirmed we went. They have photos of our equipment left behind. That’s enough for me cause we hate each other.
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Joe is a super passive-aggressive kettle-bell-strong jew-jitsu-shill supreme..
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
Well its no rocket science lmao
that demonstrates perfectly how people easily fall for this kind of bullshit
@@dorjedradul9805 Jew jit su lol
The conspiracy isn’t that we didn’t go to the moon. It’s that we never left
Real Gang 👀👀👀👀👀 I'm to high for this 😂
Sweet
It means there's been a secret space outpost on the moon since the '60s. Keep up with conversation, or you can sit at the kids table.
We all in da matrix
Daniel Joyce
I wipe before i poop
Thank you for all your great work Joe you deserve everything we all love ya
Every time the camera shifts to Ben I see him getting flying kneed 😂😂😂
Bruh I still feel like that after all this time😂😂
Homeboy looks like he did a sourhead challenge or they put a box of some stanley diapers under his table
me 2
😂
Cut it out man
On August 19th, 1960 - Russia's Belka and Strelka became the first two dogs to orbit the Earth, spending a day in space aboard the spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2.' Accompanied by one rabbit, forty-two mice, two rats, flies, and various plants & fungi. All passengers survived the journey as the crew safely returned back to our planet.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
Thanks google
When Rogan Says "I think I don't know," he could be referring to any subject he ever had an opinion about.
I remember being in class when the Apollo 13 crisis was going on . I was in a private school so we were able to pray all together as a class.
0:14 “what they did have is all sorts of pizza”
I wish you would cover more stuff like this we need to go back to it
He is on spotify
we never went there. the earth is an enclosed ecosystem. satellites do not exist they are giant cords that run along the bottom of the oceans. Joe changed his stance when they started to control him. the earth is flat, it's been proven over and over with thousands of experiments. most ppl know this they just don't report it
@Zane 778 giant cords running along the bottom of the ocean? Yeah. Oil pipes, internet/electric. There's legitimate reason in some conspiracy theories, but people like you shy everyone else away from the truth with bullshit like flat earth and enclosed ecosystems
You are wrong in saying that we didn't go to the moon. I worked the program and worked with their problems while they were on the moon. You are wrong
@@AlBundy160 I never said we didn't go to the moon. I believe we did and wish we would cover this more
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
CNN has always been such a credible source right up to this day..
@@tylergrundy4436 I think that was one time they let the truth slip through. Of course he changed his story soon after
@@tylergrundy4436 CNN is pro-system though
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared.
The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
A plane hit the pentagon.
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
Right… and NASA recorded over the first man to ever walk on the moon to “save space”. 😅 Give me a break.
Yes
The only thing they landed on was our heads😂
Is it so hard for your small brain to understand that it was incredibly expensive and there is no such benefit from going to the moon that would cover these expenses? Is it so hard for you or you just pathetic troll?
Wow, People think we didn't land on the Moon. LOL they must vote R. Funny, they believe some cat, most likely white, sits in a place they call heaven... Oh and Jesus was a blond haired Blue eyed Jew? Go to Israel. LOL
When you see a thumbnail like that with that title, you just have to click on it lol.
“Why risk human lives, that’s like.. retro” 💀🤣
I’m here for it my guy
What a what?
i think Joe has realized that he can't change minds while admitting he believes in it. I don't think he's sold out, but like everyone who's looked in to these things knows, you can't change people's minds if they think you're crazy.
Didn't he just said "I don't know"?
He's talked to enough astronauts to understand that he was just mistaken. Everything in life will always seem "shady" or "weird" if you look into it too much. It's like saying a word too many times; eventually it loses its meaning.
Which is exactly why the powers that ought not be coined the term "conspiracy theorists ". Now when you hear someone being called a conspiracy theorists it automatically discredits them and people think they are nuts! 9 times out of 10 the conspiracy theories are true..
@@Bollibompa very true and a well worded simile, but you can’t argue that there is an opposite to what you said as well.
@@jamiesuzanne5781 9 out 10 time the conspiracy freak is either an ignorant clown with a room temp IQ, or a con man like Kaysing, preying on the dimwitted and gullible.
16:50 thing falling down could be used to calculate gravity since it would give a really good gauge of downwards velocity.
Mannn! This guest truly wasn’t lying when he said that he doesn’t know much about Moon and space!
The conversation is such a non-conversation.
As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe.
Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world.
Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
why were the Astros filming from opposite side of capsule out a small round window in low earth orbit ?
Ben askren talking about moon landing is all i needed today 💀
Who the fook is that guy
He was able to stand up like that because he was pushing himself with his left hand leaning on the other astronaut. Once you see the hand you can never unsee it :)
For the astronaut standing up part, isn’t he using his left arm to grab onto the other astronaut right arm to stand up? I cant tell
It's either the other astronaut's hand or something on his suit.
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
@@stevejohnson2627that’s what it looks like
“I don’t know” it’s amazing how aligned my own views on conspiracy’s / UFO’s etc are with Joe.
You can tell old Joe is watching what he says now.
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
This was filmed almost 5 years ago.... lmao
Seeing how people are losing lawsuits for defamation and others prosecuted for threats... freedom of speech is just an expression these days.
@@robby844 it was, but that still fits in with his comment. It's much longer than 5 years ago that Joe was very different to what he is now.
Considering the fact that the Moon lander was made out of popsicle sticks and tinfoil makes it even more incredible.
not to mention it was sealed by the most powerful device suited for space travel: duct tape
😂
That's what really did it for me. The fact it looks like some cheap prop used on an episode of twilight zone.
Did you hear Artemis flight was canceled due to a leak? This was supposed to be our return to the moon
@@teekaybe4016NASA is back in the money faking business...
you can watch the guy pull himself up using his left arm and his buddy lifting with his prospective right arm. he's not getting yanked up by wires. just watch it a few more times, the arms lifting are blocked a lot by the standing dude, but once you see it, its obvious that the guy on the right helps him up.
Not enough force is exerted by the standing guy to produce that kind of momentum
Joe "Operation Paperclip" Rogan
if Eddie "CNN!?" Bravo was here we could finally get some truth
There was no aircraft parts on the lawn.
sinbad656 why would there be the plane hit the building and was moving forward why would plane parts be behind the impact
Oh you were there..
First you learn grammar, then you question 9/11
sinbad656 yes there was. You know it stop denying what you know is true
mike lee look up the pictures and the video. Video is clearly fake. And the hole in the Pentagon looks like a explosion not at all a plane with wings going into the Pentagon.
If the landing never really happened, then why didnt we hear anything like that from the Soviets? Weren't they following the whole thing live?? They wouldn't have missed the chance to pick up on that
It baffles me that people think the most egocentric, ambitious and fraudulent nation in the hole world once went to the moon with that shit ass spacecraft
How did we do science on over 800 pounds of moon rocks from multiple missions? Lol. It obviously happened
The soviets literally reached out and congratulated us when they could’ve claimed it was fake
That is the best proof that we landed.
@@pheidolefanSoviets were planning to fake it as well and were outfaked
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
censorship...
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
"Did they encounter aliens on the Moon?"
Joe: "It's entirely possible."
There’s always the classic. “We told those lies many years ago. We tell the truth now.”
Joe "Believe the government account on 9/11" Rogan
to say 9/11 was inside job seems pretty obvious, but that's not to say everyone was in on the fix.
Those angled cuts don't naturally happen.
The 9/11 conspiracy theory is silly as fuck.
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Have you…. Ever seen a Hollywood movie? It’s incredibly easy to fake a realistic looking background. Unless I misunderstood your comment
@@JA-jx1hk “why would they paint a background black, it’s easier to just go to the moon”
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis.
No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Stephan Fry the actor made a great point about the if the moon landings were fake.If so then why did the Soviets not come out and say they were fake even if they knew they were real.They had their missles Aimed at America but they said nothing.The rock samples from the moon the Americans sent to the Soviets as a gesture of good will could confirm to the Soviets that the rocks were real samples from the moon.
The 'rock samples' are easily attained from Antarctica. There are a lot of them there, and they are easy to spot in a blanket of white...and it snows there very little.
Also, the 'rock' that was supposedly picked up by one of the astronauts off the surface of the moon, and given to the head of some country, personally, turned out to be petrified wood.
Why we , the soviets never sent people to the moon, nor even animals, if it was so easy like americans demonsteated that to be, but only automatic equipment, think about it
With the whole “ he couldn’t have stood up like that without a wire” thing. If you look at the close up they give you see his arm is on his buddies right hand sleeve. I think it’s plausible that he could have given one good yank expecting it to take more force than actually required and it gave him the boost needed.
Honestly the moon landing was done in the middle of the Cold War. I remember learning about the space race and I can definitely see our government doing something like this
The moon landing is real, i can see why its easier and sexier to think otherwise but that operation in today dollars costed 280$ billions. With today NASA budget it would take them 12 years to amass that amount of money. Shit can be done when the Russian announce they’re going on the moon😂.
The belief was back then in 69. Stanley Kubrick had just finished making the movie "Space Odyssy 2001" in the London studios at Boreham Wood.
Scenes in that movie were coincidentally very similar to scenes of the original moon landing.
The story goes, as the US was behind in the space race. The CIA approached Kubrick and asked for his assistance in faking the footage of the moon landing. Kubrick "allegedly" tried to expose this deception by leaving clues in the movie "The Shining" .
It was claimed this was the reason for his untimely death. ....Allegedly!
@@planetyouranus22 , no, the alleged reason for his untimely death was the film he had just finished making - Eyes Wide Shut. They wouldn't wait 30 years to kill him over the faking of the moon landing footage, but for exposong the paedophiles that run the world, yup.
Ty
Honestly...you mean , honestly believing that and the learning isn't brainwashing?
If you look closely at the astronauts when Joe says "they looked like they got yanked up" you should be able to clearly spot that the second astronaut is pulling up the first one back on his feet by yanking on his arm. And when you consider the fact that it's 1/6 th earth's gravity we're talking about, it makes sense it looks like that.
Joe Rogen should really see this comment. As he said, he does not understand the concepts... Sometimes you should stick to what you know because the mind plays tricks.
@@ВукВуксановић is that the point I'm trying to make?
There's nothing clear there don't be dishonest, there's no clarity that he pulled him up... He could have pulled him up yes but the video is not clear at all and even with close inspection it looks like he is magically straightens himself out without any grounded feet or clear exertion of force from the other astronaut
@Kelly Arthur care to provide source and time frame?
@Kelly Arthurwho said I believe in any fantasy.. Big assumption there I just want to know whether there is a clear video of him being pulled up.. Which I haven't seen, and you haven't provided so I'm not gonna just go by your word because you've " seen the film "
You forgot the Dune Buggy and the astronauts playing golf!😂😂😂
And?
What's your point
Wow, they packed equipment to help them traverse the moon, and some guy snuck a golf club on the lander because it was funny.
@@cardboard9124 No he didn't. Alan Shepard constructed a make shift club out of left over equipment.
@@Ruda-n4h he still brought a golf club head, what I said works well enough
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back"
" We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing"
- NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on RUclips. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
@@wickedliquid1177
Not today but 50 years ago?
We never went to the moon
@@wickedliquid1177 pics or it didn't happen
ruclips.net/video/TFqCRd-6JQY/видео.html
Joe really pulled a perfect Jack Nicholson's Joker smile on this thumbnail
Until there is another moon landing, I will remain skeptical about the moon landing. I don't know if they did or didn't land on the moon. Let them do it again.
Do it yourself, moron.
Franc Mittelo well said!
Nice burn but we have Billionaires that would do it in a second if they could. Going to the moon is one of the few things money can't buy. Think about that.
There have been 6 manned Moon landings.
Hahaha. No there hasn't. There have been ZERO. Next they'll tell you they are going to Mars, ahahaha.. ha. ZERO CHANCE. What did you 'Wiki' it.. That's good cointelpro.. If it's on Google it's true..
Incorrect. They did send creatures around the moon before the moon landing.
The Soviet Union did - Zond 5.
I've often wondered if they faked the first landing just to end the space race with the Russians. Then , actually went there later.
Yes. & Nope. With what they did for the fake one, They would of absolutely made a spectical of a real one.
@@jeffmiller3499 The US was way to proud to lie about something like this. We went to the moon. The US always took every chance to flex. They had the money and tech, it's easier to say "here's a blank check. get us to the moon before the russians do".
The Soviets were the people who had the most to gain by exposing it as a fake, yet they never did.
@@fillinman1 I don't understand why people still believe it's improbable that people landed on the moon.
Never went. Nonproof other than fake photos and speculation and gov lies.
The thing that convinces me is the fact that the Russians admit we made it to the moon and back. They would have been the first to debunk it and they monitored our first mission and still claim to this day that it was legit.
THIS....RUSSIANS SAID LEGIT....NOT A CHANCE IN HELL, THEY DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, NO WAY THEY COULD KEEP A LID ON IT , THERE WERE LITERALLY A COUPLE THOUSAND PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH APOLLO 11.....CASE CLOSED
@@pugmunster2270 couple of thousand? Try 250,000
@@pugmunster2270 ?
Yeah you are naive.
ruclips.net/video/16MMZJlp_0Y/видео.html
@@B..P.. we went to the moon and there is substantial evidence for this, that video is made by someone who obviously made by someone who doesn’t understand aviation or science. Read a book and get a life.
I’ll never get tired of hearing Joe try to say “Joint Chief of Staff”
I watched a documentary that said, “we had to keep the ship turning like a rotisserie to keep one side from getting too hot!!” How did they walk on the moon without getting too hot?
"I watched a documentary that said, “we had to keep the ship turning like a rotisserie to keep one side from getting too hot!!” How did they walk on the moon without getting too hot?" Insightful question. There is a range of temperatures found at any one spot on the moon from Way Too Hot to Way Too Cold, depending on the time of day or night. All the Apollo missions landed not long after sunrise, when temps were in the moderate range, the same temps found on Earth. I'm no authority on this, but that's what I've read and it makes logical and physical sense.
@@gives_bad_advice OIC.
I love how the thumbnail is Joe doing Jack Nicholson’s ‘shining’ face.
😂
Ben Askren is just like “yeah uh huh” as Joe is going off lmao
Fuck yeah Lol, Its weird that Joe way more nerdy than Ben.
@@tommydawson7147 Joe is cool as hell. I’m 34 years younger than him and I’d love to chill with him lol
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It really was a plane. This is documented historical fact.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo no, it isn't..
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field.
There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
Joe this convo is waayyy over his head
I love how Joe rogan can turn round and say, I don't know. If you talk to conspiracy theorists they are adamant the conspiracy theories are fact!
Conspiracy Theorist ™️ is over user. It’s a CIA term to discredit. All it means is a theory that someone or thing has conspired to deceive. Of course if someone has a theory they’re going to defend it.
@@JarodJoseph they blindly defend it though which is laughable.
@@JarodJoseph
Conspiracy theory is not a CIA "term". Absolutely false. What's hilarious here is that you are resorting to a baseless conspiracy theory about conspiracy theory to defend baseless conspiracy theory. The unintentional irony is as excruciating as it is amusing.
If he don’t defend they will drop him🤣
@@harryevans1786 but it's conspiracy fact. Especially in the JFK and RFK cases now. And tin foil won't save you against the radiation in space. There was no way NASA could possibly trace an obstacle free course to moon. They were always in the blind.. Travelling at those speeds in a thin tin can was perilous and tempting disaster at every attempt. The chances of getting away with it every time would be astronomical to use a pun.
Ben Askren is actually a pretty smart dude. This was a good watch
Smart dudes would know who Werner von Braun is.
Yes of course he might be smart, but he is obviously not a history professor
@@Kay-jg6tf you’re mistaking “smart/intelligent” with “educated”
@@marisamoravec9809 Well, that's true i guess.
But i thought this was common knowledge, pretty sure if i asked a 12 year old here in Norway he/she would know who it is.
@@Kay-jg6tfUSA likes to omit facts from children’s education. I learned a ton about Nazi’s in my public education but never who he was or that they brought many Nazi scientists over that should’ve been war criminals. I learned about that on my own studies as I did with many other subjects the country should be embarrassed by. I don’t think people understand the levels the Kennedy s, LBJ, etc were willing to go to plus many other high profile families of the time and during the world wars.
People Who believe in a god are crazy
The best was Ali G interviewing buzz aldrin " so wot duz you av to say to all dem people dat say the moon doesn't really exist" 😂
the astronaut pull himself up using his left arm, grabbing the guy standing up
Stanley Kubrick filmed it in London at the MGM...Nixon implemented it to take the heat away from Vietnam
Are you serious or trolling
And why kubrick
@TacticalTech There is no camera or film light reflecting.
Even by 1968 Apollo had become controversial with the public and congress, which is one reason why Lyndon Johnson and then Richard Nixon killed anything in the future; Johnson because he was having problems with the Vietnam War and the Great Society and Nixon because he was a good politician and saw that the Moon could harm his presidency.
NASA did not lose the technology to go to the Moon in the sense that it was forgotten, mislaid or mysteriously disappeared. Some of the blueprints still exist on file; but the individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost. And on top of that, much of the equipment is incredibly dated, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” but would have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better.
The Van Allen belts are very narrow, occupying a fraction of the path between the Earth and the Moon. The Saturn V trajectory took the rocket through the thinnest part of the outer belts in about 90 minutes, so the dose of radiation was within safety limits. Each mission flew a slightly different course in order to access its landing site, but the orbital inclination of the translunar coast trajectory was inclined to the Earth’s equator by about 30°. A spacecraft following that trajectory would bypass all but the edges of the Van Allen belts.
Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation.
It's pretty simple, cost vs reward of going to the moon is a very one sided story. If there were potential habitable areas or valuable assets there, we would have colonized and or strip mined it by now. As far as the argument of the technology differences of then to now only reflects progress. Does anyone remember seeing photos of the first contraptions people were trying to take flight with? Now compare that with a SR-71. If those first guys hadn't tried, the latter wouldn't exist. It's always trial by fire when attempting such phenomenal new feats. So the first missions to the moon were indeed extremely risky (especially by today's standards) but they were the first steps in seeing how far we could go. While I will agree somethings do seem out of place with the moon landing, (but what hasn't had things out of place when a government is behind the wheel) the fact that we now certainly have the technology to get people there and back but don't, leads me to believe they had seen what they needed to see and the results didn't yield a worth while reward to merit continued expeditions. And yes, a lot of scientists and engineers of that time were plucked from Nazi Germany. Now the video showing the guy standing up after falling, if you look his right hand is down as well as his right knee. His left hand appears to be holding onto the standing astronaut. Standing up from that position in 1/6 gravity using your right knee and hand to push off of the surface and your left hand pulling down on the other astronaut, wouldn't be that big of a grasp.
Get layed once.in your life
@@inyourwifesas1033 Your name speaks volumes about your projection issues within your own words.
I bet lol
Lmao yea dude sure it’s not like don Pettit made an entire Ted talk about why the moon would be of ultimate scientific importance. Stop lying to yourself in order to just go along with what the elites that hate us want us to think. We didn’t go and it’s the most logical conclusion we can come to seeing the modern state of nasa and what happened after the “moon landings”.
@@JA-jx1hk When you read a posted reply that begins with LMAO, you just know you're in for a wealth of well thought out statements, arguments and fact.... (FART SOUND).....
One week he is agreeing with degrasse and the next week he is conspiracy joe. Pick a side man
Are you realizing he's full of shit just now
Harold BeaumontFinns he has got worse, and now he seems to think no one remembers what he says week to week.
He flip-flops about as much as Hillary.
Welcome to a "worm hole" as opposed to a "rabbit hole" when information presents itself to an individual that can compel a person to CHANGE THEIR MIND. (Sometimes known as "flip flopping")
@@jebidiahnewkedkracker1025 joe is more disingenuous. Social Chameleon, changes to suit the people around him while kerping hus true opinions quiet........... Unless its about weed.
"That video is real. That's from Television."
🤣👌
When US figure-out how easy is to fool their people... they probably got really exited and full of ideas.
News flash.thats how every country treats its people. Js
@@Queenmebonnie no other country has tried to pretend they went to the moon tho..
@You're Wrong they pretended they went to the moon too?? Safe to assume youre american?
@You're Wrong wtf are you even saying? China and russia have different moons? What does that mean? I feel like youre about to tell me the earth is flat next..
It's so funny to watch people that have no idea about physics talk about physics
"I used to believe the moon landing was faked. But not anymore."
2 minutes later... "Neil Armstrong was a patsy, the astronauts were on trampolines, actually they were pulled up by wires, the flag moves in an invisible breeze..."
Great movie. Capricorn One
With the last clip of the astronaut getting up, they're literally holding hands. You can see it in the clip itself.
Also the suits they wear are pressurized so the movements you make in the suit doesn't translate to what the suit does, unlike clothes. It's like watching people dance in those fat suits, it looks funny because of the air pressure in the suit vs how the material moves. I have found that most people just don't understand enough about the world to understand what they see in these videos.
@@evroadtrips689 True. :)
The astronaut involved claims he had the other push on his head to get up and that's why it looked so weird. I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find. I saw it years ago on RUclips so I urge people to check it out for themselves. Obviously if I had the link I'd just share it now but regrettably I do not.
Not enough force is exerted by the standing guy to produce that kind of momentum
@@KarthikSrivatsan-nv6qn I doubt you have made a calculation or something to figure that, it seems you are just applying how things work here on earth to the moon.
One of the issues with “it looks like the astronauts were on wires” argument is that human beings have no baseline for what it would look like to walk around on a body with a 6th of the gravity of earth
Yeah I was cringing pretty hard when they were watching the astronaut get up, they don’t realize how easy it would be to just push off the ground with your hands to stand up. 1/6th gravity AND no air resistance.
His left arm looks like it was being supported by the other astronaut when he got up in that funny way. It made sense in my head tbh
@@samael4550 I hadn’t even considered no air resistance lol
@@bsheaves I really hadn’t considered it either until I started putting it out into words lol .. that’s HUGE, not only are we being constantly accelerated 9.8 m/s/s downwards, but every movement we make is met by the force of air resistance.
@@Pseudosuga probably to keep him planted on the ground 😂 i’m sure you could easily launch yourself up off the ground a little from a ‘1-handed pushup’ stance tbh
I may be late to this, but the astronaut did have a base to lift himself up (look at his left arm on the other man's right shoulder at 16:04) with that little help up and 1/6 gravity allowing him to prop himself up, allowed him to make a winding gesture back on his feet. Based on that it seems plausible that its really in space.
I was thinking the exactly the same thing. He has something on the front of his suit which in that blurry crappy film looks like his left arm, which makes it look impossible. But it isn't his left arm. When you realise where his left arm REALLY was afterwards, then re-watch the video and imagine where his left was the whole time (you can't even see it at the points he stands up so you have to visualise it), it's entirely possible.
Taking the left arm into consideration, I can actually do that here on earth. It's not easy you probably have to be fairly athletic, but possible. So you could definitely do it in 1/6th gravity.
In such low gravity how do u explain the dirt falling off him so quickly to the ground
@@stevekohl8768 right? These dudes can never be fooled. Don’t question anything and never think on your own
@@stevekohl8768 dust falls the same speed as a sledgehammer in vacuum
@@stevekohl8768 are you really gonna try and tell me that you can see dirt particles moving from that 60's camera filmed at a distance from the astronauts? what are you even talking about, you cant really see any dirt
For those thinking we didnt go to the moon you have to answer the question why the Soviet Union in the middle of the Cold War went along with us and humiliated themselves with their failed attempts at Baikonur? They would have known if we faked it and even they didnt pretend we didnt land men on the moon.
Or they weren’t willing to be known as being faked
If 1/6 gravity is too hard to imagine, just try imagining 6x normal strength on Earth. How high would one of those calf muscle hops or clapping push ups be with 6x strength? You can do some weird looking shit when the rules are different.
Mr.BigBoss7 people on earth arent jumping with astronaut suits and these arent basketball players
Being 6 times as strong or 6 times as light does not equate to 6 times as high of a vertical leap. It is not linear like that. The best squat lifting powerlifters are not the best jumpers. There were plenty of people who could squat way, way more than Michael Jordan could in his prime, but that did not mean they could jump higher than him. If you go on a squat program and get strong enough to double your squat PR, that does not mean you will be anywhere close to doubling your vertical jump. Trying to make an argument based on an assumption that an increase in strength or a decrease in weight will result in a linear 1:1 increase in vertical jump is nonsense. Vertical jump has a whole lot to do with how fast your muscles contract and move your limbs, rather than how strong or how light you are. The astronauts may have been lighter on the moon, and that helped their jump, but they were not able to contract any faster. So they were not going to jump 6 times higher just because the became 6 times lighter. It is not 1:1 like that.
@Mr.BigBoss7 However the suit would limit that height by the weight you have to add to the person and the restricted mobility. I can jump higher in sweatpants than with tight jeans and a backpack on.
you realize they weren't jumping around right? they had to skip around so they wouldn't trip on their feet since humans get used to their feet hitting the ground depending on gravity
FreedomFighter you would be a 1/6th your weight, not 6x stronger... You don't understand simple physics. 😴
This is years later, but the astronaut stood up by pushing off the other guy
He didn’t even touch him
@@edgarmartell3668 look at his left arm; he's pulling himself up on the other guy's shoulder...
Joe Rogan needs to read the book "The Man who ran the Moon" and he won't be undecided.
Did anyone else notice the thing that fell off the astronauts back pack at 16:50 it fell way faster than the astronauts do.
Shit was super fake
Nothing fell off his pack, that was his left foot.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing look again behind him. something definitely fell onto the ground.
@@muleunit yeah.. like I said. It was his left foot kicking the regolith. Just some “dirt”.
because it was effected by earth's gravity.
Jamie got his thumbnail game to perfection. 😂 This is gold.
The weirdest thing I have read is that after leaving Earth atmosphere the astronauts would have this 'hallucinations' is the best way to describe it. Apparently Buzz Aldrin was the one who talked about it.
High G from the launch restricts blood flow to the brain, they absolutely could have been a bit loopy after that