Looking to get an apsc camera. An apsc camera should be a traveler, compact, light camera with a good battery. There are options in canon r10, r50, r7, r100 etc etc. what are the differences among them?? Sony just has 1 up-to-date model a6700 and a plethora of lens options. Can't get simpler than that. Big win for Sony.
RUclips is a giant ad space. Literally every channel for cameras or film gear are just ads for these companies. Sony leveraged this the best. And people going on vacation think they need an fx3 😂 marketing works.
Started off with an M50, moved up to an R6, 24-70L. 16, 35, 50, 85 non L. I like my Canon gear, I’m a CPS member. I’d never recommend Canon to anyone. They created a new hot shoe and the adapter for it is always out of stock. Well known concern about hot shoes coming loose, 400 dollar fix. Micro HDMI. 30 min record limit for my R6 that should have been at least extended to 45 mins via firmware. Clunky app. Overpriced battery grips. I could go on.
C70 user here. We use it in my video agency and have done video work for Rolls Royce, Duracel, Bluetti and many more. In my opinion, the people who always complain and switch cameras are the people who don't know how to use them so they can blame the camera companies.
Maybe to an extent but I remember when I was starting on on a T3i and then moved to a T6s Canon wasn’t really upgrading enough important features. That’s when the Sony a7iii came out, and for the price blew away the competition. I haven’t looked back since. These days though you can’t really go wrong with any brand.
Sony is killing the Doc work to and the Cinema too with the venice. He right canon lost the next generation of shooters. Nikon used to be #1 before Canon. SONY IS THE MORE HUNGRY COMPANY. WE USED TO LAUGH AT SONY. NOW WE LAUGH AT CANON. LOL
This is a dumb take. Why do you own a c70 instead of whatever camera you owned before that? Because the tech gets better every year. Companies that request a certain camera, would never request c70. They request either arri or red or sometimes a high end sony camera. I worked with samsung and we shot stuff on iphone and fx3. Working with big brands says absolutely nothing about the camera being good or not. People often switch brands because their current brand is letting them down. That is why people are mostly switching to Sony and not from sony.
@@mbismbismb completely agree, and don't get me wrong i fell in the trap and went from sony to canon. But i will not be switching again. I've learned it's all the same, don't like the colors? Convert it, don't like the lenses? Adapters exist and work great. I currently use canon r6 mii and it's a beast but so was my a7iv when i had it. They are the same with a few different gimmicks
I would agree with this 100% - Sony A7iii -> A7S III & now FX3 owner and the only thing I MIGHT (big might) switch to, is RED - but that has A LOT of expensive strings attached to it, including new lenses, media and workflow... Especially when I can get 85%-90% (maybe closer even) of the look of some really expensive RED cameras with my current setup...
@@115chandler1 yes of course we can convert to the colours we like its just that canon colours is always spot on if u have thousands of wedding files, and heavy workloads... canon is just perfect professional wants to get their jobs done quick to generate money, sony is for hobbyist u hv plenty of time to edit not suitable for business
I'm on sony. been using an FX3 for the past year or so for work and then finally bought my own rig this year. it's a BEAST of a camera, and paired with Gmaster glass it's just beautiful.
Agreed. Brands and their technology will always improve so switching for a feature is … not smart. I think that people who switch brands must not have any investment in glass and are chasing the latest “thing”. I saw a comment that the brand didn’t “show me love”… Do I need Canon or Sony to “show me love”? Seriously, I’ve wore Nike for 40+ years and never received a check… the goal should never be for the brand to recognize you, or anyone else for that matter. Be creative because you love it!
Surely we have to speak about how captivating your scenes are as you continue to explain your reasoning and logic in this video! Love how you put so much effort into this video especially since it’s an explainer of your opinion of why you switched over! The effort put into this is absolutely amazing, thank you! 🥺✨
I've been on Lumix for 7 years, having started with the G7 in late 2017 because it was a cheap 4K capable camera that provided more video support than anything else in its price range. That tiny camera carried me for 6 years until I upgraded to the G9ii last year. If I had all the money in the world I might just get an A7Siii or FX3, but Micro Four Thirds has saved me in size, weight and cost, and Lumix camera bodies never fail to steamroll their contemporaries when it comes to support for video shooters. Depth of field and low light performance are the two big limitations, but at the learning stage I'm at I feel that over-relying on bokeh can be a huge crutch, and being forced to light my scenes will teach me more than just always relying on ambient light. The dreams of shooting ultra-shallow-depth-of-field star-lit scenes shall be saved for another time.
I personally use the S5ii, and use an FX3 at work. I feel like the the S5ii is easier (for me) to just grab, go, and shoot. And the Lumix ibis makes my gimbal collect dust 🤣
@@Vesnic8if you want natively supported non adapted glass you’ll end up paying more. l mount doesn’t have nearly the same third party support and the native branded glass is stupid expensive. You can go G, Gmaster, Sigma, Sigma Art, Tamron, Samyang and the half dozen other Chinese companies that make lenses for Sony. There’s a lens for just a bout every price range. You’ll pay more for the body but less for the glass in the long run. Vs the Panasonic where you’ll save on the body but the glass will kill you lol.
Oh im on Fuji because I’ve always been an admirer of film looking scenes and shots, but I’m also into video so pairing those ideas is why I use my Fuji xs20.
I started on Sony because of you back in those 6300 days. I picked one up and never looked to another brand. Built a business with Sony, and traveled the world with Sony. Im rocking with a a7iv now because of my hybrid style of work is needed but YC can you please make a rec709 and a lut pack for these new sensors lol.. my color game is solid but still this day i can never get my footage to Look as good or close to yours #respect EVERYBODY THUMB THIS UP FOR YC TO CONSIDER THE IDEA 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
@@YCImaging The booklet sucks. I am going to have to get online to learn how to set everything up that I want to use on this beast. I did take my first shots and the raw looks pretty great in comparison to my R5 and R62.
I’m on Canon…works great for my needs and I’m too lazy to switch. I do agree with you on some frustrations work Canon but to your point, I think we’ve hit a plateau in the overall market. It’s almost like cell phones coming out every year. Not much can be changed in a year. With that said, I was disappointed in the R5 M2…you think after 4 years it would have a little more. I’ll probably keep my R5 for several more years. It’s a fantastic portrait lens, mainly what I shoot. Thanks for the video and love your content.
@@sharpasl307 overheating issues, decent hybrid though. A7S III was a competitor for cheaper, FX3 is better for sure. R5C is okay too. The biggest limitation is Canon lens choice and features...
for me (someone who was CPS for years, shot canon for more than a decade, etc), the third-party lens debacle is like a microcosm of what's so frustrating about canon right now, and what makes me so anxious about investing in the canon ecosystem. it wasn't just that canon harmed a lot of manufacturers (and also obviously customers) by aggressively shutting down third-party lenses and adapters. canon caused serious damage to customers' trust in them and in the RF platform, and quite simply they haven't done anything to **actively** repair that trust. they seem to hope that the trust will simply regrow on its own. but that's not how it works after you've damaged things. if canon had reached out to manufacturers to help them develop third-party lenses and adapters, rather than dragging their feet and reluctantly allowing sigma (and maybe one other manufacturer?) to make a few lenses, then canon shooters like me might feel like the RF mount isn't a cul-de-sac of a lens platform. instead, i'm looking at the E mount and the L mount and i'm thinking those mounts are thriving. edit: i'll also say i upgraded to an RF body years ago, but i've been so reluctant to get RF lenses because i became apprehensive about the long-term value of RF lenses when i started hearing rumors about them shutting down third-party manufacturers, and i don't want to throw good money after bad. canon should have never precipitated this situation where people credibly feel that way about their lenses, and they should work to undo that. they shouldn't just coast along hoping things get better; they need to find a way to undo that atmosphere of dread they've created.
Yep! Canon did not think that strategy through. I get that professionals need professional glass, but is that the only market? I love being able to adapt glass on Lumix and not worry.
@@FPVwineUK that, and: there's a lot to say for sigma and other lenses, which sometimes deliver image quality on par with L series lenses. and of course the lenses that are just strange experimentations that canon would never think or bother to implement (like weird probe lenses and stuff that Laowa has made). even if the image quality isn't at the level of sigma's ART series, i have plenty of strange and interesting lenses that simply bring a lot of character to shots, so to me it's not even about budget vs high-end; it's about the latitude to get a shot that's only available with a particular lens. canon doesn't seem to want to support that, and it isn't reassuring when they drag their feet and seem really put-upon just to allow a couple of third-party lenses intrude into what they appear to think is their domain
The lens mount hysteria is so overblown its comical. I own the R5, R7, C70, about to pick up the R5II, and multiple DSLRs and have not needed to buy a single RF mount lens. The RF mount is fantastic actually because it allows me to use the Meike vND adapter which turns all of the RF mount cameras into a mini C70. I have shot for ad agencies, big events, promo videos, commercial work, etc. nearly daily, and never once gave the lens mount a second thought. Just buy into whatever ecosystem best works for you, but stressing over a lens mount when you have almost 30yrs worth of cheap high quality EF lenses at your disposal is truly comical. If I had to buy a new lens tomorrow I would get an EF lens just so that I can keep using the vND adapter.
I'm a canon user for 10 years. Canon Is more expensive but worth it for ever. Sony can't make a camera or lens for every use. You become lost on different models and hard menu! But canon has something like R5 ii.
It’s not only that canon doesn’t learn from their mistakes, they just don’t care to offer more to the customers, as you said, Sony goes back and corrects mistakes, meaning, it doesn’t matter if a APSC camera drops from Sony, the improvements made prior are going into that camera, with canon they don’t, canon just care about the top of the line products, but they lose on the back end because they not doing enough to pull people in…. Sony is blowing canon out the water and it’s as if its too late for them
I started on Canon about 10-11 years ago and switched to Sony after a few years as it was the “industry standard” for TV and docos but I was never happy with the image and colour grading always infuriated me lol. Then in 2020 I used the EOS R for a lol and did not expect to switch back to Canon so quickly - it’s so easy to grade, user friendly, doesn’t get in my way. Sure, Canon aren’t superior technically, but for me the C70 and R6mk2 nail everything I need/want from a system, except for one thing - I do miss that internal variable ND haha
Started with an A6400 and now full frame FX3. Love the way you produce your video. First time viewing and I have to mention that your ad placement wasn't even an ad placement, it didn't seem like one, any way. Very smooth. Subscribed for sure. Very insightful video. Thank you.
The only time I hear about [insert manufacturer here] users switching to Sony is online. Every professional I know in real life has stuck with their stuff unless they were switching from DSLR to mirrorless, which most still stuck with their manufacturer. Canon is indeed like Apple. They let everyone else figure stuff out for them and then implement the best features. That's why they're so polished vs. early iterations from places like Sony. Since the R3/R5/R6(Especially R6II), the bodies are on par or better than anyone else. The R5 is still a BARGAIN imo if your main use case is photos. The RF glass is among the best in the industry(and the cost shows.) Only real criticism is that they should open up the lens mount to 3rd party glass. Then they'd basically have a perfect hardware ecosystem. It's also kind of odd that these video specific shooters keep expecting every body to fulfill that purpose. Canon themselves have said the R5 bodies(aside from C) are photo focused bodies with some video functionality. I've switched systems from Nikon(DSLR days), Fujifilm X series and GFX 50 bodies for studio stuff, and some Sony. My first Sony was the A6100 I think, then the A6300, then the A7R2(I think, may have been the first one), then the A7III. Had a mix of GM glass and 3rd party stuff. Mainly photos but a slight bit of video once I got the A7III. Every single body I had issues with and eventually gave up and moved to Canon when the R5 came out and I have not had an issue since. Sold off everything else and have been pleasantly surprised with the products. I think if I need a dedicated video rig I might splurge on the FX3(if budget allowed) or something but for photography/hybrid stuff, I just don't see how I could need more from a camera than what I have.
Sony and Nikon have more choices and higher quality when it comes to lenses over canon. I has an r5 twice and sold it off both times because my images we sub par compared to work I was doing on my Nikon z7 and sony a7riv. Id rather use a Nikon z7 over a canon r5.
Loved the content flow and transitions on this vid. The yellow time marker bar on the advertisement was brilliant. I even watched the whole advert because i could tell when it would end. Nice job.
Yes!! This! When I looking for a new camera I admittedly went to try out a Sony. I was on Canon already but I wanted to see what the fuss was about. I couldn't get that menu system at all! So I went and picked up an R5 on sale instead.
What I like about my Nikon of 1979 is that there are no menus. Just shoot. I'm not a fan of menus, too many options that lead to doing the same one thing, taking a picture. Can do most of it on a vintage camera without a menu system.
Are you talking about the menu system? Because Canon's menu system has changed quit a bit since 1997 and it's seems like you've already had to learn new systems over time anyway.
@@tjsn-4vision ah ok gotcha, yeah I love Canon actually. The C300 is my most favorite camera of all time. I just feel like it's kind of impossible to compare Canon to Sony if you've never used a Sony before.
Back when the R5C and FX3 were both new I was heavily considering grabbing the Canon. I ended up changing my mind and going with an FX3 and couldn't be happier. I ended up doing a similar thing to you where I sold my other gear (Sigma FP) for an A7IV so my A/B cameras could operate under the same ecosystem and color science. It's made everything so much simpler for me and my workflow, and both of those cameras are so powerful, I doubt I'll ever need to upgrade again (I also got an X100VI as a EDC and pickup shot camera, and that little beast is also impressive). Great video as always YC.
Lets be honest, the truth is: We all want video specs, we all want to use a diversity of lenses on our camera. Canon stopped in time about video specs and RF mount was a shot in the foot. I was a Canon DSLR user, but now im a hater because of these things. Canon, stop being DUMB and open the mount for other manufacturers AND make better VIDEO cameras. Thats it. And Sony, please learn how to make a decent menu!!!
The lens mount hysteria is so overblown its comical. I own the R5, R7, C70, about to pick up the R5II, and multiple DSLRs and have not needed to buy a single RF mount lens. The RF mount is fantastic actually because it allows me to use the Meike vND adapter which turns all of the RF mount cameras into a mini C70. I have shot for ad agencies, big events, promo videos, commercial work, etc. nearly daily, and never once gave the lens mount a second thought. Just buy into whatever ecosystem best works for you, but stressing over a lens mount when you have almost 30yrs worth of cheap high quality EF lenses at your disposal is truly comical. If I had to buy a new lens tomorrow I would get an EF lens just so that I can keep using the vND adapter.
I used Cannon since 1993, I became a photographer when film was the thing, until 3 years ago, I totally switched to Sony and I have not looked back, smartest choice I have ever made as a creator and business man, This is the most honest video I have seen in a while!
I jumped on the Canon wagon a couple of years ago to start creating content and after a while, when I started learning more and more about camera and all, I started regretting deeply my choice. The fact that I'm stuck in that environment, with little to no option of having third party lenses is what break the deal for me. I'm considering changing systems when I'm financially capable and will most likely be Sony. Your videos are cool, just subscribed!
i started with Sony and was doing portraits, bought all the GM lenses but i was never happy with the colors... took me forever to edit. Switched to the Canon R5 and never watched another RUclips video about camera gear since. BUT i still have 7k in sony lenses lol BUT your edits and coloring are amazing bro, i dont think it would matter what camera you use, your quality is dope! but for photos of people I will never leave Canon, i dont think its possible for another company to catch up to the color science of the skin Canon has. Even in your sony video, the colors you use are more artistic than "real" SO thats why i think any brand would serve you well since your so artistic and talented... btw I almost bought the A7cii but it doesnt do 120fps 4k. I wanted to keep a sony camera cause i loves how small everything is.
A focusrite color checker passport will give you correct standard colors for any camera. It costs $100. Nikon and Sony have better straight out of camera colors though imo
@@Yupthereitism ive got that, still no comparison. i believe color science is a real thing and were used to seeing certain tones... alot of it may be personal preference but everytime i put Canon photos side by side with Sony or Nikon I can see a clear difference. But to each his own i guess, like i said i still have alot of sony lenses, maybe ill try it again at some point for video. not for still photos..
@@JohnMihelakis I agree. I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. The rich and natural colors that Canon produces is so damn good and very difficult to match in post using a Sony footage.
Hey @YCImaging, I've been a longtime fan of your channel and have always appreciated the authenticity and valuable insights you've shared from your experiences. Lately, though, it feels like the content is leaning more towards monetization rather than connecting with us, your core audience, who really value hearing your personal stories and advice. I understand that everyone needs to make a living, but I hope you continue to stay true to yourself and what originally made your channel special. Looking forward to seeing more of the genuine content that made me a fan in the first place!
I won an Fx3 in a contest and it had been my favorite camera ever since. The truth is that you can shoot great videos without having great cameras. The most important thing is lighting and composition. I really enjoy your videos because you spend so much time making the lighting in the composition in the angles interesting for the viewer. Even if the titles aren’t interesting to me personally, I like to watch your videos because I learn new things about capturing attention of the viewer. I really do enjoy the Sony ecosystem. I have many different cameras that I use from them. Especially the FX three in the FX 30. I really enjoy how small and versatile they are and how amazing the colors and clarity are even very dim light.
I’m on sony because when i first got started, the a6100 was right in my budget and had the features i wanted for video and photo. At least i thought so. Told myself i didn’t need the a6400 because i would never shoot log. Upgraded to a used a7iii for 4k/24 log shooting (lol) and the budget third party glass.
Thank you for sharing, Chrystopher. Interesting content and much to ponder. Especially love the way you narrate your story (top notch sound-design and video as well as cutting and colour grading). Inspiring! Enjoy your new gear. And finally to answer your question: Will stick to Canon for the time being. I use the camera and lenses I have - and make the most of it. Sometimes I wonder, why we tend to be more technology driven than asking ourselfes what is necessary. I mean: really necessary. Not even mentioning the impact we have on nature acting like this. Sustainability or cycle economy is something to think about. That is why I apprechiate, that you decided to sell your Canon equipment. Best regards from Germany 👋🏼
I recently sold my C70 and R6 and picked up a FX3. I still have 2 5D mark ii’s for photography along with the 85, 50, 24-70, and sigma 70 to 200. I’ve always been a canon user, but I’ve had my eye on Sony since the A7S ii. It was only a matter of time. Like you said, all cameras are pretty good now. This ecosystem suits me better.
@@benarnoux yup. My 5D mark iii is the weapon of choice for pics. That L series 24-70 never leaves it, but for video, and to avoid all the calculated shenanigans Canon has for their video, I had to go A7s iii over the R5 and won’t go back.
Nikon. My dad shoots Nikon and lets me use his lenses, so that is the reason I bought into it. I also think that their being in 3rd place allows/forces them to make each release a best-in-class camera. Just look at the z6 III (my current camera) They also have great glass and a decent amount of 3rd party glass. The new AF has fixed all of the complaints from the z6 II and the video features are great! I also love the photo files and the color is great. The main reason they're not more popular is they don't have the influencer base that Sony or Canon has.
@@BrianHallmond I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. Can the SLog3 be color graded to match with Canon's rich and eye catching color science?
@@TravAlligator I don't think Canon is that far ahead with colour science anymore and their third party hogging is annoying. I went with Canon, but wish I stayed with Sony. If Nikon brings out something new next year with more modern features, I wanna switch to Nikon.
Hey man, thanks for sharing your thoughts through the way you film. Much appreciated! And here I am having recently sold everything Nikon and pivoted to Canon's R5. Yep, the first one, just a week before the Mark II came out and left me feeling I overpaid for my new, but second hand, camera body. Two reasons for avoiding sony for me: I'm a landscape photographer just discovering video. So the primary reason for camera use is still photography. Sony's "star eater" problem is still very much an issue where black holes appear in bright stars in astrophotography/nightscapes. And there's still no focus bracketing feature in-camera while both Canon and Nikon have that. Small tip, you might want to high-pass the audio of the in-car while driving shots. The sub goes crazy there. :)
It looks like canon is losing the next generation of photographers,videographers and cinematographers. The sad thing is they don’t see it coming. People are starting out on EV1, A7…, A6.. and then moving on to FX3, FX6 and then fit in to big Cinema with the Venice, with Emount lenses all the way through including cinema glass. That used to be canon’s road map. Canon has killed the RF lens mount. It will never be what EF mount was it’s to late for them now. They will fall out of favor once the old timers leave. They have a terrible long term road map. They lost the documentary space already and never had the big cinema market presence. It not looking good for Canon. Their glass is too expensive to gain any traction to finance any further R&D. Business 101 customers have to buy it, like and want it. People are speaking with their wallets. Poor employees more lay-offs coming.
The biggest reason is marketing. Canon's hardware is fantastic, to me the best in the industry. But Sony goes after RUclipsrs and influencers HARD... like way harder than all other camera companies combined. Sony has some decent specs in their cams, but when I've actually tried them, I just don't like them all that much. Also, people have been brainwashed into the whole "Sony listens to its customers and Canon doesn't" which is hogwash. Sony still has really bad LCDs from 15 years ago. Their menus are "OK" but they refused to listen to customers when it came to things like Firmwares, etc too. Meanwhile since Canon first put out the R, every new iteration has been answering most the requests that customers have had. The R5 from when it was released to where it was a couple years later was SO different. From added Clog 3 (R6 as well), to adding dual video recording (R6 too), to new codecs and bitrates, and actually fixing the overheating issue on the R5. Then the R6 II came out and addressed almost all of the shortcomings of the R6 original. No more record limits, no more overheating, dedicated photo/video switch, more custom modes, higher resolution, and so much more. Meanwhile Sony and Panasonic still only have 1.5x 4k60 crops for their competitors to the R6 II , and much slower photo bursts and much worse rolling shutter. Now the R5 II is out with Clog2, and new cinema codecs and a lot more. And the third party glass is starting to come slowly... at least for APSC. Meanwhile the great news is that unlike Nikon or Sony, Canon's DSLR glass adapts perfectly with no downsides and work as well as native RF glass in most cases. Who really cares about global shutter outside of the 3 people that need to shoot photos with flash in the sun. It has way more negatives than positives at this point.
The "Sony is all marketing," line is copium. The R5 got updates because they launched an early-access product that literally didn't do the thing it said it could do. I mean it did. For 5 minutes before it had to cool down for 45 minutes. The R had terrible autofocus, terrible battery life and one card slot at launch. It was essentially an A7II. It's not okay that they've cut out third-parties. There's no road-map for third-parties on full-frame but it's okay because it takes old lenses. Why buy the new system, then? Their lenses consistently cost more than the competition and are made of plastic. These are things that should bother you. This is a grift, and you're a mark.
@boundaryscience sony and canon quality is basically the same at the end of the day. Sony will always be more expensive when it comes to lenses and the lenses aren't worth the higher price. Many old old EF lenses are still going strong after many years. I know videoogrpahers that use Canon bc yes the cameras have a plastic body but that's lighter on a gimbal. Not to mention sonys video editing software has always been subpar. To say canon is better than sony or sony is better than canon is all opinions and preference at this point. The differences are very small and each manufacturer have cameras for different purposes.
Sony is just better than canon at video, and imo photography. The only people who stick with canon are people who care more about the camera body itself over the final product.
"Decent specs" I had to pause reading that. Sony is usually the first with new technology. Look how long it took canon to get mirrorless cameras and stacked sensors. A9iii this year has global shutter. The one thing sony drags their feet with is with firmware updates. Other companies are way better at that.
Great video. I am actually a Canon R6ii use it right now and I'm very happy with my camera. However, I am very much infatuated with the different looks of Nikon and Sony which is why I purchased a Z6 and also an A7 3, both used. I wanted to test the systems and then make my decision of where to go full fledged. Then as I get more Savvy into the system, I realize that the lens options from third-party companies is really only fluent within Sony and Nikon. So this is why I am going to be leaving Canon as soon as I can. Right now though I am looking for a replacement for the a7iii because I'm not going to keep it. I know it is notorious for the shudder crashing on its users and I don't want to deal with that at all. I need help right now figuring out what camera would be best to buy for being able to do my vlogging and also commercials for restaurants and food reviews. I will also need it to do amazing portraits indoors and Outdoors as well. Basically I need a Workhorse at the most economical cost since I'm going to have to buy 2 cameras.
I’m on LUMIX S5II and I love the improvements they did on the camera. Yes it has a crop at 60 but for 2k you can beat it. I was thinking about Sony but I feel like there menu system is complicated and will be a learning curve. I’m hoping LUMIX does something dope with the S1H soon. Sony cameras are dope though.
I am sure the S1H II is going to be great, but I think it is going to be pretty darn expensive. What I really hoped is that Panasonic would release a Lumix version of the a7S II: Basically, a 12 (or 16)MP sensor with a fast readout speed that can deliver 4K 60p uncropped and 4K 120 with a SLIGHT crop. I would assume that Panasonic COULD pull that off for the $2,500 mark. Is it relevant now in late summer of 2024??? Not sure others would be down, but for me, it would be great. (Having said all that, I do like my S5 IIX quite a bit).
I used the original S5 for 3 years and S5II for a bit as well and the new Sony menus are better than LUMIX. Figured out the FX30 menu fast and remembered things, S5 even after 3 years I would still have to dig.
Went from Nikon to Sony in 2012, I never looked back! Bought FS700 in 2013 with Odyssey 7Q Monitor for RAW shooting. A7Riii in 2018 for 2nd cam and photography. A7Siii in 2023 for smaller ergonomics and internal 10bit codecs. The consistency with matching 3 cams through the Odyssey 7Q around my shoots has been fantastic. Looking at your A7Cii setup for compact shoots, intriguing. Thanks for your insight!
If Sony didn't feel like holding a computer up to my eyes, I might be in to them. But they're a consumer electronics company that just bought up camera tech companies and people and slapped their own brand on 'em. Happy to have them out there as competition to make everyone better, but the products are soulless.
I've only got back into things this year. I'm a hobbyist. I got a used A6000 for like $300 and loved it. But immediately fell into the hype of Fuji 100vi. Got it. Didn't like the lens stuff, so I sold it back, grabbed the X-T5. Love this camera. Can work with it. But have been peeking over the wall at Sony for video reasons. Your post really helped solidify my thinking .
All professional users will use canon. That’s just a fact. But……. Sony on that a$$… I was looking into Sony the other day. I just love my r6 mark 2 and r5 c.
Sony is the standard for video and photo now. Pretty much every corporate shoot I see now is with a Sony. Canons are for casuals and Sony is for professionals.
The problem is other sony and nikon doesn't have good hybrids. A74 with trash cropped 4k aint working, A7s3, FX3 don't do good photos, yeah they shoot but 12mp is for 2002 days. While Z8 being good alternative hybrid to R5 or R5ii, z8 shitty screen, mediocre AF and REC2020 color space for NRAW ain't working for me. Z8 does overheat. Its not that famous in overheating as less people are using it. While there's these high resolution cousin of A74 like A7R5 or A7R4 are there, sony capped the video features, mediocre noise performance and codec features. The OG R5 had bad codecs but usability wise there's not a true hybrid that can still replace the OG R5. We are 99% satisfied with the camera, no issues, can shoot amazing photos and videos. Sony's hybrid path is long gone as they made 2 paths for video and photo. If they implement good hybrid on future A75 it will kill, A7R5, A7SIII, FX3, FX9 and burano. Even z8 sweep most of the floors of these cameras. C400 with triple base iso and RAW features wrecked Burano to its depths. Now Z6III with 6k raw😅😅 future for sony is hard. And nikon implementing all RED tech to its camera😊. So yeah we cant own seperate camera for photo and video so we dont care about Sony's caped video only camera.
Create! Just one thing to be fair I always see you using EF lenses not RF so auto focus might lack a little but! As well just keep teaching and creating you are a big inspiration to me always
Mate, I’ve come to a point in my career where brand loyalty’s not the be-all and end-all anymore. I’m a part-time interior and real estate photographer while working full-time as a valuer here in Australia. Most of my clients don’t really give two hoots about camera specs, but they do seem to stick with brand names. My first pro camera was a Canon 5D2, and I busted my chops to get all the f2.8 zooms for the EF mount, plus a bunch of primes like the 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, and 100mm. Back then, about 10-12 years ago, Canon was the dream, and I held onto that gear for years. Fast forward to today, I’m still using my EF lenses, but I’ve moved away from Canon professionally. My current setup revolves around Fuji - rocking the XT5 and XH2S with booster adapters for my full-frame EF zooms, and some EF APS-C glass as well. My go-to combo these days is the Fuji body paired with a Tokina EF 11-16mm f2.8 and Sigma 18-35mm f1.8. I still carry the Canon 70-200mm and 50mm f1.8 in the bag, just in case. I’ve dabbled with Sony too - still break out my original A7 for interior shots when the client needs them. But picking Fuji was more about the dollars and sense than getting caught up in specs. I’ve used the XT3 and XT4 before my current setup, bought them brand new, and after tax deductions, I even managed to sell them at a profit. Not heaps, but enough to pretty much score a free laptop thanks to the tax break. I do like Sony - have rented the FX3 and A7R5s for those high-end jobs - but I just can’t see the same tax perks with Sony as I do with Fuji. And don’t even get me started on the Fuji fanboys - they’re a whole other level!
Canon user here for 30 years, own two R5's and loads of RF glass, and gotta say that Canon deserve a lot of hate for their arrogant attitude towards customers. 30 minute record limits on the R5, banning 3rd party lenses and now stopping third party battery compatibility with the R5 MK2 smacks of a company that is in a war against its customers rather than helping them to create better content.
I left Canon years ago when year after year, they refused to improve the dynamic range of their sensors. I know their sensors are fine now, but I see they are still slow as mollases in responding to customer requested features.
I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. Can the SLog3 be color graded to match with Canon's rich and eye catching color science?
@@TravAlligator i have been searching for a camera for a month now. if you buy it now, Canon R6 ii is really balanced, there is Nikon Z6 iii at just a bit higher price range (in my country it is so high that I just gave up on Nikon). If you want to get a Sony for full frame, either get a7cii (for its compactness) or wait for a7 V. I think it will be released until the end of Q1 2025 the latest. Though Canon R6 Mark 3 might also be released, Sony a7 V will probably more up-to-date newer features.
@@zaporoshti3392 Yes A7V or Canon R6 III would be great options if they are coming soon. How about Sony FX30 II or FX3 II? If they come I'll jump and buy one of them.
@@TravAlligator Sony waits 3 years between each version of a model. Therefore, FX3 might get an update after 1 year, for FX30 it might take 2 years. When released a7V will probably a very up-to-date camera.
I’ve got a way older Canon so selling it won’t get me enough to upgrade to a different system. Just saving money and watching videos like this to figure out if I should switch when I’ve got enough!
As a hobbyist/part time photographer, I left Canon and went back to Sony because Canon RF mounts are prohibatively expensive to build out a kit. Sony has an extensive third party and used selection. I still prefer Canon's ergonomics, and the menus probably are a bit more intuitive. But really Sony lets me actually build my kit and get the photos I need to get, without selling a kidney.
Although it is taking time, at least Canon is finally starting to open up to 3rd parties again. Just have to continue to wait. Still not stopping me from going to a LUMIX S5II tho… lol! I’ll keep my canon gear though as I do enjoy the more intuitive menu system, as you mentioned. I’m just used to it.
I Appreciate the knowledge y'all be dropping. I brought a Sony a6400 as my first camera w/ 18-135 kit lens, I'm currently filming a short film with it and I have no filmmaking experience besides watching you guys videos.
Not me buddy, Im currently using the the R6, and for my business, the R6 is just perfect, I switched to Sony a couple times and I ended coming back to canon, Sony just doesn't feel good in my hands lol, colors are way different, so I sold all of the Sony gear and bought the R6, and about to buy the R5 for a main camera and the R6 as a back up, your video was great.
There are 4 reasons why Sony has won (talking about fx3 over other canon cameras): 1) 12800 ISO noiseless 2) no overheating 3) no crop on 4k slowmotion 4) Not limited to third parties E-mount like the RF and they did everything else right. They fixed the colors with the S-log3, they have one of best autofocus, they fixed the menu, they fixed the battery life, they made a good camera. Panasonic had all the chances to get some market share with S5II and x, but 1) Crop on slowmotion 2) not much choice for lenses 3) still baaad autofocus 4) not 5 axis stabilization like sony's
@@FraneFilmsyes. it is smoother, I have a s5ii also and I like the stab more than fx3. but have you seen the footage on lumix if you put a 18mm lens? You know why the edges wobble? It's that 5th axis, which Lumix doesn't have.
I think you make many valid points but for my line of work (shooting live events) I'm still using oldies but goodies ( Sony's FS7 II, Canon's C500 II & C70). since my clients still can't tell the difference between my FS7s & C70s, wouldn't make sense for us. I'll just keep watching your videos and living vicariously through you.
Dude, they're already starting. They're careening wildly into Playstation 3 launch territory. Always go with third-place if you can. That's why I have Sony AND Nikon. Nikon's just trying harder and my Sony lenses work just fine on it.
I'm so with you on this.. I have canon and sony.. R3, R5C, R6mkii, c200, and 1dxmk ii... Sony A7RV, A74, A7Siii, and FX30.. It's really interesting that Sony has made me disappointed with Canon gear. I used to love Canon. Now I find myself not really touching my canon gear because of the weight, AF (not as good), I really only use my Canon gear when I want to "look" special. lol. Sony doesn't have a visual wow factor., but the 16-35GM and 35-150mm is a game changer for events.
I said that when the 5D II came out. Never know what will happen; Nikon bought RED and is getting serious about cinema. They probably will adapt RED RAW + sensor tech & color science into a mirrorless in the next few years. The RED RAW is true RAW, its way different than anyone's but Arri.
Great video! Love hearing your perspective on things. I have been a Canon user for over 20 years and don't see myself making a shift away fully. I've used sony several times over my career and always end up back at Canon. I use an R5 for my daily work and content creation and I love it. I do a mix of photo and video and I personally have never encountered overheating or anything like that even on longer shoots. I do think Sony makes some amazing gear and they have come along way. A lot of the numbers, I think, come from the flood of "content creators" and people buying Sony to make youtube channels or film stuff for IG. But I agree that Sony has been better about innovating and listening to the users. At the end of the day we use what fits us best and what we are most comfortable with. As I said, I will stick wtih Canon for what I do and rent gear as needed for bigger projects. It all depends on how we work and what we are doing. But if you are good at what you do, you can get a great image out of almost any camera these days,
Simple reason: Sony hit us with full-frame, 4k, and low light performance with more people (creators) showing love for the Sony brand name. It looked cleaner and sharper even if the color wasn't as good as Canon. Canon had/has better color, but Sony looks pro and with some color correction, it looks better.
I'm still working with the C70 and R5C for my outdoor survival and camping videos. You're right about everything today being great, gear wise. Can't wait to see what's available in 10 years.
Actually switched from Canon to Sony in May got a Sony A7RV & Sony FX3. I loved Canon but I don’t regret the switch at all! The low light & auto focus with Sony is hard to beat!
I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. Can the SLog3 be color graded to match with Canon's rich and eye catching color science?
Great vid and addressed a lot of the things that frustrate me about canon. Only reason I haven't switched is because the R6 is the first camera I feel like I don't need to upgrade for what I do. It's so fast and nice to use and the images and video are amazing. I also used a Sony (a7r3) once and just didnt like it. The screen was awful, the autofocus was not great and the overall usability of the camera didn't feel as smooth and fast to use and don't even get me stated on that menu system. It was however very nice to hold and the images that came out of that thing were insane (when in focus). I just prefer a more smooth and intuitive user experience because otherwise I'm missing shots that could be bangers. Coming from Fuji to Canon I realised just how important that was.
Well said! I turned on Canon when Canon turned on me. The lack of ability to purchase third party lenses was a decisive issue for me. This policy followed the lack of Windows 11 support for a long-held but still very useful Canon printer, i.e. no updated driver. You can get me cranky once, but don't do it twice or you are dead to me.
I got my first DSLR (Canon Rebel T6) senior year of high school in late 2017 and I've been rocking with Canon ever since. I mostly use my camera for hobby photo/video stuff for fun, would like to do more production/paid work with it but I've had more success with remote video editing so I don't need the latest and greatest camera right now. I upgraded from the T6 to a 90d a few years ago and even though it's still a DSLR, I've loved using it. Would love to upgrade to a mirrorless like the lumix s5 ii or canon r7 or one of the many sony options, but it's just not worth the investment for me. Good vid enjoyed the breakdown of both brands here
I needed to see this! It’s great to know I wasn’t the only one holding on to Canon. I agree with so many points, especially for full-time RUclips & content creation-Sony just makes our lives SO MUCH EASIER! Keep grinding bro! Much respect!
Bro, I love your videos and you’ve taught me SO much over the past 5 years since I’ve been watching, but as someone who cares, this wireless mic you’ve been using ain’t it. Just my two cents but you have a voice that keeps my attention but recently you haven’t sounded the same. I seriously thought my phone speakers were going bad bc you sounded so compressed. You have a pleasing voice but that wireless mic is anything but complimentary for you. Maybe it’s the ease of use, maybe hollyland is paying you, either and any way I’m sure there’s a reason but I’m just not feeling it. 😂 I know we aren’t friends like that but I’m just looking out. I appreciate you immensely and love the content, please keep it coming. You inspire and motivate so many of us. Thank you
I am a canon camera user and I choose to be because I love the menu system and the camera is nice. I don’t really like the current mount system but that is because I started with EF and as it stands I don’t really see a need to go mirrorless right now. But with the way things are mirrorless is the wave. If I had to go mirrorless I would consider canon first just because I have a lot of Ef lens… but I really like Nikon in that market and the medium format camera are extremely versatile but pricey. Sony is great and I like the fact the mount is consistent but I am only speaking from stills only… great video and great content… maybe if I was in the creative RUclips industry I would see more of it from you point of view…
Today was my first time checking out one of your RUclips videos and I must say you did an excellent job of explaining your point of view on the two camera systems. Liked and subbed. 💯📸🙏💪
This is so well said - I think you hit the nail on the head in the first minute... camera's have plateaued (which is not a bad thing!) and there's not a bad camera out there. I, personally, prefer and enjoy the Canon ecosystem better than Sony (as a Sony A7IV owner) - but they're both amazing. Another great video, man!
I’m literally selling my canon gear to switch to Sony and the A7c II is the one I have been considering. Thanks for this video! Def sold me on it and made me confident in my choice.
Thanks for your insight on an interesting topic. I've been in the Canon ecosystem for almost 10 years. I would have to make a bold move to switch brands due to my lens collection. It can be done, but it's a bigger step for some. I will be keeping my eyes open on new tech for cameras going forward...
R.I.P to the summer! New amaran app out now, download: geni.us/amaranDownload
Thanks was looking at both cuz.
You just made me love filmmaking and content creation all over again with your new video style ❤
Looking to get an apsc camera. An apsc camera should be a traveler, compact, light camera with a good battery. There are options in canon r10, r50, r7, r100 etc etc. what are the differences among them?? Sony just has 1 up-to-date model a6700 and a plethora of lens options. Can't get simpler than that. Big win for Sony.
RUclips is a giant ad space. Literally every channel for cameras or film gear are just ads for these companies. Sony leveraged this the best. And people going on vacation think they need an fx3 😂 marketing works.
Marketing DEFINITELY works!
@@YCImaging I watched the matrix and sold my gear now I just use iPhone log and pocket 3s!
“People going on vacation think they need an FX3” - dying 😂
@@cjm8160frl 😂
Started off with an M50, moved up to an R6, 24-70L. 16, 35, 50, 85 non L. I like my Canon gear, I’m a CPS member. I’d never recommend Canon to anyone. They created a new hot shoe and the adapter for it is always out of stock. Well known concern about hot shoes coming loose, 400 dollar fix. Micro HDMI. 30 min record limit for my R6 that should have been at least extended to 45 mins via firmware. Clunky app. Overpriced battery grips. I could go on.
Can we take a moment to appreciate all the different angles that were used in this one video. So dynamic! Another great video brotha!
C70 user here. We use it in my video agency and have done video work for Rolls Royce, Duracel, Bluetti and many more. In my opinion, the people who always complain and switch cameras are the people who don't know how to use them so they can blame the camera companies.
Maybe to an extent but I remember when I was starting on on a T3i and then moved to a T6s Canon wasn’t really upgrading enough important features. That’s when the Sony a7iii came out, and for the price blew away the competition. I haven’t looked back since. These days though you can’t really go wrong with any brand.
and sony only popular on youtubers ahahahaha. professional dont care to switch here and there
Sony is killing the Doc work to and the Cinema too with the venice. He right canon lost the next generation of shooters. Nikon used to be #1 before Canon. SONY IS THE MORE HUNGRY COMPANY. WE USED TO LAUGH AT SONY. NOW WE LAUGH AT CANON. LOL
This is a dumb take. Why do you own a c70 instead of whatever camera you owned before that? Because the tech gets better every year. Companies that request a certain camera, would never request c70. They request either arri or red or sometimes a high end sony camera. I worked with samsung and we shot stuff on iphone and fx3. Working with big brands says absolutely nothing about the camera being good or not. People often switch brands because their current brand is letting them down. That is why people are mostly switching to Sony and not from sony.
@@robinmc123false
I think real users arent leaving canon or sony. Just creators that do camera stuff. And lets be honest at some point they will always switch again
they are getting paid, we all know sony has this sony influence programme
@@mbismbismb completely agree, and don't get me wrong i fell in the trap and went from sony to canon. But i will not be switching again. I've learned it's all the same, don't like the colors? Convert it, don't like the lenses? Adapters exist and work great. I currently use canon r6 mii and it's a beast but so was my a7iv when i had it. They are the same with a few different gimmicks
yea I've noticed this. Because outside of RUclipsrs and Influencers, everyone I knew simply uses what they like and are used to.
I would agree with this 100% - Sony A7iii -> A7S III & now FX3 owner and the only thing I MIGHT (big might) switch to, is RED - but that has A LOT of expensive strings attached to it, including new lenses, media and workflow... Especially when I can get 85%-90% (maybe closer even) of the look of some really expensive RED cameras with my current setup...
@@115chandler1 yes of course we can convert to the colours we like its just that canon colours is always spot on if u have thousands of wedding files, and heavy workloads... canon is just perfect professional wants to get their jobs done quick to generate money, sony is for hobbyist u hv plenty of time to edit not suitable for business
Your transitions into each talking point is crispy, but the product placements of your sponsors are top tier.
I'm on sony. been using an FX3 for the past year or so for work and then finally bought my own rig this year. it's a BEAST of a camera, and paired with Gmaster glass it's just beautiful.
FX3 for the win!! Rig it out!!
Amen
Can we get a review before the year ends
If you get in love with a brand you are lost. Gear is just a tool for creation
I feel this!
At the same time I LOVE Apple lmaooo
Agreed. Brands and their technology will always improve so switching for a feature is … not smart. I think that people who switch brands must not have any investment in glass and are chasing the latest “thing”. I saw a comment that the brand didn’t “show me love”… Do I need Canon or Sony to “show me love”? Seriously, I’ve wore Nike for 40+ years and never received a check… the goal should never be for the brand to recognize you, or anyone else for that matter. Be creative because you love it!
facts
We can't help who we Love! #canon
Surely we have to speak about how captivating your scenes are as you continue to explain your reasoning and logic in this video!
Love how you put so much effort into this video especially since it’s an explainer of your opinion of why you switched over! The effort put into this is absolutely amazing, thank you! 🥺✨
I've been on Lumix for 7 years, having started with the G7 in late 2017 because it was a cheap 4K capable camera that provided more video support than anything else in its price range. That tiny camera carried me for 6 years until I upgraded to the G9ii last year. If I had all the money in the world I might just get an A7Siii or FX3, but Micro Four Thirds has saved me in size, weight and cost, and Lumix camera bodies never fail to steamroll their contemporaries when it comes to support for video shooters.
Depth of field and low light performance are the two big limitations, but at the learning stage I'm at I feel that over-relying on bokeh can be a huge crutch, and being forced to light my scenes will teach me more than just always relying on ambient light. The dreams of shooting ultra-shallow-depth-of-field star-lit scenes shall be saved for another time.
I personally use the S5ii, and use an FX3 at work. I feel like the the S5ii is easier (for me) to just grab, go, and shoot. And the Lumix ibis makes my gimbal collect dust 🤣
Yeah I use an FX30 which is APS-C which ain't bad
Look into Panasonic S1 - it beats A7Siii in many respectives. And you can find one on the market at around 800 us dollars. It is a very serious camera
@@Vesnic8if you want natively supported non adapted glass you’ll end up paying more. l mount doesn’t have nearly the same third party support and the native branded glass is stupid expensive.
You can go G, Gmaster, Sigma, Sigma Art, Tamron, Samyang and the half dozen other Chinese companies that make lenses for Sony. There’s a lens for just a bout every price range.
You’ll pay more for the body but less for the glass in the long run. Vs the Panasonic where you’ll save on the body but the glass will kill you lol.
Oh im on Fuji because I’ve always been an admirer of film looking scenes and shots, but I’m also into video so pairing those ideas is why I use my Fuji xs20.
I started on Sony because of you back in those 6300 days. I picked one up and never looked to another brand. Built a business with Sony, and traveled the world with Sony. Im rocking with a a7iv now because of my hybrid style of work is needed but YC can you please make a rec709 and a lut pack for these new sensors lol.. my color game is solid but still this day i can never get my footage to Look as good or close to yours #respect EVERYBODY THUMB THIS UP FOR YC TO CONSIDER THE IDEA 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Not me! I picked up my new R5 mark 2 today. About to make my unboxing video now. Good luck on your new journey bro. You helped me on mine
That’s fire! I’m still gonna test it out
@@YCImaging The booklet sucks. I am going to have to get online to learn how to set everything up that I want to use on this beast. I did take my first shots and the raw looks pretty great in comparison to my R5 and R62.
I’m on Canon…works great for my needs and I’m too lazy to switch. I do agree with you on some frustrations work Canon but to your point, I think we’ve hit a plateau in the overall market. It’s almost like cell phones coming out every year. Not much can be changed in a year. With that said, I was disappointed in the R5 M2…you think after 4 years it would have a little more. I’ll probably keep my R5 for several more years. It’s a fantastic portrait lens, mainly what I shoot. Thanks for the video and love your content.
I'm surprised Sony is still in the camera business after Canon made the R5
@@sharpasl307 overheating issues, decent hybrid though. A7S III was a competitor for cheaper, FX3 is better for sure. R5C is okay too. The biggest limitation is Canon lens choice and features...
for me (someone who was CPS for years, shot canon for more than a decade, etc), the third-party lens debacle is like a microcosm of what's so frustrating about canon right now, and what makes me so anxious about investing in the canon ecosystem.
it wasn't just that canon harmed a lot of manufacturers (and also obviously customers) by aggressively shutting down third-party lenses and adapters. canon caused serious damage to customers' trust in them and in the RF platform, and quite simply they haven't done anything to **actively** repair that trust. they seem to hope that the trust will simply regrow on its own. but that's not how it works after you've damaged things.
if canon had reached out to manufacturers to help them develop third-party lenses and adapters, rather than dragging their feet and reluctantly allowing sigma (and maybe one other manufacturer?) to make a few lenses, then canon shooters like me might feel like the RF mount isn't a cul-de-sac of a lens platform. instead, i'm looking at the E mount and the L mount and i'm thinking those mounts are thriving.
edit: i'll also say i upgraded to an RF body years ago, but i've been so reluctant to get RF lenses because i became apprehensive about the long-term value of RF lenses when i started hearing rumors about them shutting down third-party manufacturers, and i don't want to throw good money after bad. canon should have never precipitated this situation where people credibly feel that way about their lenses, and they should work to undo that. they shouldn't just coast along hoping things get better; they need to find a way to undo that atmosphere of dread they've created.
Yep! Canon did not think that strategy through. I get that professionals need professional glass, but is that the only market? I love being able to adapt glass on Lumix and not worry.
@@FPVwineUK that, and: there's a lot to say for sigma and other lenses, which sometimes deliver image quality on par with L series lenses. and of course the lenses that are just strange experimentations that canon would never think or bother to implement (like weird probe lenses and stuff that Laowa has made). even if the image quality isn't at the level of sigma's ART series, i have plenty of strange and interesting lenses that simply bring a lot of character to shots, so to me it's not even about budget vs high-end; it's about the latitude to get a shot that's only available with a particular lens. canon doesn't seem to want to support that, and it isn't reassuring when they drag their feet and seem really put-upon just to allow a couple of third-party lenses intrude into what they appear to think is their domain
@@somewhatboxes exactly, weird! I'm Lumix all the way atm
The lens mount hysteria is so overblown its comical. I own the R5, R7, C70, about to pick up the R5II, and multiple DSLRs and have not needed to buy a single RF mount lens. The RF mount is fantastic actually because it allows me to use the Meike vND adapter which turns all of the RF mount cameras into a mini C70. I have shot for ad agencies, big events, promo videos, commercial work, etc. nearly daily, and never once gave the lens mount a second thought. Just buy into whatever ecosystem best works for you, but stressing over a lens mount when you have almost 30yrs worth of cheap high quality EF lenses at your disposal is truly comical. If I had to buy a new lens tomorrow I would get an EF lens just so that I can keep using the vND adapter.
@@VUMEDIAGroup you sound like you would be fun at parties. Only being able to adapt to EF is limiting in so many ways.
I'm a canon user for 10 years. Canon Is more expensive but worth it for ever. Sony can't make a camera or lens for every use. You become lost on different models and hard menu! But canon has something like R5 ii.
I have been using CANON since the 70s... YES 1970s...
It’s not only that canon doesn’t learn from their mistakes, they just don’t care to offer more to the customers, as you said, Sony goes back and corrects mistakes, meaning, it doesn’t matter if a APSC camera drops from Sony, the improvements made prior are going into that camera, with canon they don’t, canon just care about the top of the line products, but they lose on the back end because they not doing enough to pull people in…. Sony is blowing canon out the water and it’s as if its too late for them
so true.
New Sony a7III user here. Thank you for this video and info.Your channel ALWAYS helps me! Hope to meet you in the future one day!
I started on Canon about 10-11 years ago and switched to Sony after a few years as it was the “industry standard” for TV and docos but I was never happy with the image and colour grading always infuriated me lol. Then in 2020 I used the EOS R for a lol and did not expect to switch back to Canon so quickly - it’s so easy to grade, user friendly, doesn’t get in my way. Sure, Canon aren’t superior technically, but for me the C70 and R6mk2 nail everything I need/want from a system, except for one thing - I do miss that internal variable ND haha
The canon c70 is so noisy and soft, I couldn’t get along with it. I much prefer Sony for video
Started with an A6400 and now full frame FX3. Love the way you produce your video. First time viewing and I have to mention that your ad placement wasn't even an ad placement, it didn't seem like one, any way. Very smooth. Subscribed for sure. Very insightful video. Thank you.
The only time I hear about [insert manufacturer here] users switching to Sony is online. Every professional I know in real life has stuck with their stuff unless they were switching from DSLR to mirrorless, which most still stuck with their manufacturer. Canon is indeed like Apple. They let everyone else figure stuff out for them and then implement the best features. That's why they're so polished vs. early iterations from places like Sony.
Since the R3/R5/R6(Especially R6II), the bodies are on par or better than anyone else. The R5 is still a BARGAIN imo if your main use case is photos. The RF glass is among the best in the industry(and the cost shows.) Only real criticism is that they should open up the lens mount to 3rd party glass. Then they'd basically have a perfect hardware ecosystem. It's also kind of odd that these video specific shooters keep expecting every body to fulfill that purpose. Canon themselves have said the R5 bodies(aside from C) are photo focused bodies with some video functionality.
I've switched systems from Nikon(DSLR days), Fujifilm X series and GFX 50 bodies for studio stuff, and some Sony. My first Sony was the A6100 I think, then the A6300, then the A7R2(I think, may have been the first one), then the A7III. Had a mix of GM glass and 3rd party stuff. Mainly photos but a slight bit of video once I got the A7III. Every single body I had issues with and eventually gave up and moved to Canon when the R5 came out and I have not had an issue since. Sold off everything else and have been pleasantly surprised with the products. I think if I need a dedicated video rig I might splurge on the FX3(if budget allowed) or something but for photography/hybrid stuff, I just don't see how I could need more from a camera than what I have.
I have an R6 and my only real ask is for Canon to open up the mount. Till then I'm using EF glass and the cheap 16mm f/2.8
Sony and Nikon have more choices and higher quality when it comes to lenses over canon. I has an r5 twice and sold it off both times because my images we sub par compared to work I was doing on my Nikon z7 and sony a7riv. Id rather use a Nikon z7 over a canon r5.
Loved the content flow and transitions on this vid. The yellow time marker bar on the advertisement was brilliant. I even watched the whole advert because i could tell when it would end. Nice job.
I am a canon user. The only thing i hate about Sony is the menu. In my opinion...it freakin sucks
I never liked the ergonomics of the A7 series. Camera is a tiny bit too small.
yeah mee too
Yes!! This! When I looking for a new camera I admittedly went to try out a Sony. I was on Canon already but I wanted to see what the fuss was about. I couldn't get that menu system at all! So I went and picked up an R5 on sale instead.
What I like about my Nikon of 1979 is that there are no menus. Just shoot. I'm not a fan of menus, too many options that lead to doing the same one thing, taking a picture. Can do most of it on a vintage camera without a menu system.
@@bondgabebond4907 the point of having a more professional camera is creative control, if you just want a decent pic use a phone at this point
I did the opposite. Sold my FX6 and FX3. Moving back to Canon after switching 3 years ago to Sony. I will stay on Canon for good.
God Bless you Child... YEA ... CANON
Man I have been a canon user since 1997! Long time. Simple put I just don’t want to learn another system. Canon is giving me what I need.
Are you talking about the menu system? Because Canon's menu system has changed quit a bit since 1997 and it's seems like you've already had to learn new systems over time anyway.
@@sixofsix true but not much from each year I learned to adjust with canon ungraded. I never use Sony. So basically it’s easy for to stick with canon.
@@tjsn-4vision ah ok gotcha, yeah I love Canon actually. The C300 is my most favorite camera of all time. I just feel like it's kind of impossible to compare Canon to Sony if you've never used a Sony before.
@@sixofsixI have been tempted though. Sony is amazing for video
This all day! Some jump on the Sony bandwagon because its what the other pesson is doing.
Back when the R5C and FX3 were both new I was heavily considering grabbing the Canon. I ended up changing my mind and going with an FX3 and couldn't be happier. I ended up doing a similar thing to you where I sold my other gear (Sigma FP) for an A7IV so my A/B cameras could operate under the same ecosystem and color science. It's made everything so much simpler for me and my workflow, and both of those cameras are so powerful, I doubt I'll ever need to upgrade again (I also got an X100VI as a EDC and pickup shot camera, and that little beast is also impressive). Great video as always YC.
Lets be honest, the truth is:
We all want video specs, we all want to use a diversity of lenses on our camera. Canon stopped in time about video specs and RF mount was a shot in the foot. I was a Canon DSLR user, but now im a hater because of these things. Canon, stop being DUMB and open the mount for other manufacturers AND make better VIDEO cameras. Thats it.
And Sony, please learn how to make a decent menu!!!
Sony menus make sense if you owned a ps2
that doesn’t make it better but it does help lol
@@poelogan i love canon menus, but sony's... damn is horrible
The lens mount hysteria is so overblown its comical. I own the R5, R7, C70, about to pick up the R5II, and multiple DSLRs and have not needed to buy a single RF mount lens. The RF mount is fantastic actually because it allows me to use the Meike vND adapter which turns all of the RF mount cameras into a mini C70. I have shot for ad agencies, big events, promo videos, commercial work, etc. nearly daily, and never once gave the lens mount a second thought. Just buy into whatever ecosystem best works for you, but stressing over a lens mount when you have almost 30yrs worth of cheap high quality EF lenses at your disposal is truly comical. If I had to buy a new lens tomorrow I would get an EF lens just so that I can keep using the vND adapter.
@@VUMEDIAGroup If i buy a new camera that i have to use a adapter, no thank you.
I only know the sony menu on a7iv and it works for me🤷🏾♂️
well, hope you find happiness in switching gear. Loving my Canon R5 Mark II!!! 💙💙💙💙💙💙
"No matter what race you are" speaks volumes. 🤔If you know, you know. 😑
Oh, no!!! I started following your work for your R6 videos.Those videos helped me a lot. Sorry to hear you leaving Canon.
I used Cannon since 1993, I became a photographer when film was the thing, until 3 years ago, I totally switched to Sony and I have not looked back, smartest choice I have ever made as a creator and business man, This is the most honest video I have seen in a while!
I have use Canon since 1979
That's great Judi!!
Sony is good...
Which one did you switch to?
My first one was an A74, with a 24 to 70mm, then I got a A7R5 with a 70 to 200 II.
Very reliable cameras.
I jumped on the Canon wagon a couple of years ago to start creating content and after a while, when I started learning more and more about camera and all, I started regretting deeply my choice. The fact that I'm stuck in that environment, with little to no option of having third party lenses is what break the deal for me. I'm considering changing systems when I'm financially capable and will most likely be Sony. Your videos are cool, just subscribed!
i started with Sony and was doing portraits, bought all the GM lenses but i was never happy with the colors... took me forever to edit. Switched to the Canon R5 and never watched another RUclips video about camera gear since. BUT i still have 7k in sony lenses lol BUT your edits and coloring are amazing bro, i dont think it would matter what camera you use, your quality is dope! but for photos of people I will never leave Canon, i dont think its possible for another company to catch up to the color science of the skin Canon has. Even in your sony video, the colors you use are more artistic than "real" SO thats why i think any brand would serve you well since your so artistic and talented... btw I almost bought the A7cii but it doesnt do 120fps 4k. I wanted to keep a sony camera cause i loves how small everything is.
Sell me some of your glass
A focusrite color checker passport will give you correct standard colors for any camera. It costs $100. Nikon and Sony have better straight out of camera colors though imo
@@Yupthereitism ive got that, still no comparison. i believe color science is a real thing and were used to seeing certain tones... alot of it may be personal preference but everytime i put Canon photos side by side with Sony or Nikon I can see a clear difference. But to each his own i guess, like i said i still have alot of sony lenses, maybe ill try it again at some point for video. not for still photos..
@@JohnMihelakis I agree. I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. The rich and natural colors that Canon produces is so damn good and very difficult to match in post using a Sony footage.
Hey @YCImaging, I've been a longtime fan of your channel and have always appreciated the authenticity and valuable insights you've shared from your experiences. Lately, though, it feels like the content is leaning more towards monetization rather than connecting with us, your core audience, who really value hearing your personal stories and advice. I understand that everyone needs to make a living, but I hope you continue to stay true to yourself and what originally made your channel special. Looking forward to seeing more of the genuine content that made me a fan in the first place!
If you’re confident in your stuff and now how to deliver, you don’t need to “show up to the party” with the latest fuss.
Good video, usually I hate these "I’ve switched videos” and this one was very well done. Good job dude! 👏
As a canon R5 user, the MII doesn't offer me anything that I don't already need.
Do you mean “that I don’t already have”?
Coming from the R10, the R5Mk2 was a huge upgrade, but I can see how when you have the R5, it's not that big of a jump.
I won an Fx3 in a contest and it had been my favorite camera ever since. The truth is that you can shoot great videos without having great cameras. The most important thing is lighting and composition. I really enjoy your videos because you spend so much time making the lighting in the composition in the angles interesting for the viewer. Even if the titles aren’t interesting to me personally, I like to watch your videos because I learn new things about capturing attention of the viewer.
I really do enjoy the Sony ecosystem. I have many different cameras that I use from them. Especially the FX three in the FX 30. I really enjoy how small and versatile they are and how amazing the colors and clarity are even very dim light.
I’m on sony because when i first got started, the a6100 was right in my budget and had the features i wanted for video and photo. At least i thought so. Told myself i didn’t need the a6400 because i would never shoot log. Upgraded to a used a7iii for 4k/24 log shooting (lol) and the budget third party glass.
Thank you for sharing, Chrystopher. Interesting content and much to ponder.
Especially love the way you narrate your story (top notch sound-design and video as well as cutting and colour grading). Inspiring!
Enjoy your new gear. And finally to answer your question: Will stick to Canon for the time being. I use the camera and lenses I have - and make the most of it. Sometimes I wonder, why we tend to be more technology driven than asking ourselfes what is necessary. I mean: really necessary. Not even mentioning the impact we have on nature acting like this. Sustainability or cycle economy is something to think about. That is why I apprechiate, that you decided to sell your Canon equipment. Best regards from Germany 👋🏼
I recently sold my C70 and R6 and picked up a FX3. I still have 2 5D mark ii’s for photography along with the 85, 50, 24-70, and sigma 70 to 200. I’ve always been a canon user, but I’ve had my eye on Sony since the A7S ii. It was only a matter of time. Like you said, all cameras are pretty good now. This ecosystem suits me better.
"I still have 2 5D mark ii’s for photography". Thank you. That reminded me of what I actually do for my clients. Video is not one of them.
@@benarnoux yup. My 5D mark iii is the weapon of choice for pics. That L series 24-70 never leaves it, but for video, and to avoid all the calculated shenanigans Canon has for their video, I had to go A7s iii over the R5 and won’t go back.
My favorite Canon is the Canon 5 D Mark II ....
Nikon. My dad shoots Nikon and lets me use his lenses, so that is the reason I bought into it. I also think that their being in 3rd place allows/forces them to make each release a best-in-class camera. Just look at the z6 III (my current camera) They also have great glass and a decent amount of 3rd party glass. The new AF has fixed all of the complaints from the z6 II and the video features are great! I also love the photo files and the color is great. The main reason they're not more popular is they don't have the influencer base that Sony or Canon has.
I'm often thinking of switching too.
I love Canon cameras but I have lost respect for their brand because of many thing's you've mentioned.
It means you are easily swayed. Go ahead and switch to Sony's awful skin tones lol
@@hectorpaglinawan1795 if I was easily swayed I would have switched already dummy. Sony modern colours have caught up. Its not 2019 anymore.
@@BrianHallmond I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. Can the SLog3 be color graded to match with Canon's rich and eye catching color science?
@@TravAlligator I don't think Canon is that far ahead with colour science anymore and their third party hogging is annoying. I went with Canon, but wish I stayed with Sony.
If Nikon brings out something new next year with more modern features, I wanna switch to Nikon.
@@TravAlligator also Sony is more affordable, has proven itself for video and is always punching put new models and supports third party
Switched to Sony a few years ago and haven’t looked backed since! But to each their own. Gotta figure out works best for YOU and YOUR workflow!
Still using a Canon M50 and bummed that Canon dropped the M mount. That said, a Sony replacement is about 2X the cost.
My channel was built on the M50. Idk what the next camera will be. I like the R5C and the FX3 so it will likely be decided by price.
Hey man, thanks for sharing your thoughts through the way you film. Much appreciated! And here I am having recently sold everything Nikon and pivoted to Canon's R5. Yep, the first one, just a week before the Mark II came out and left me feeling I overpaid for my new, but second hand, camera body.
Two reasons for avoiding sony for me: I'm a landscape photographer just discovering video. So the primary reason for camera use is still photography. Sony's "star eater" problem is still very much an issue where black holes appear in bright stars in astrophotography/nightscapes. And there's still no focus bracketing feature in-camera while both Canon and Nikon have that.
Small tip, you might want to high-pass the audio of the in-car while driving shots. The sub goes crazy there. :)
Bro - I've been reviewing Canon Cameras for the last few years, grown to over 40K on YT reviewing Canon Cameras... and Canon don't show me any love :(
That's crazy
Keep it up, it took me a while but it happened lol.
Because they dont care about their customers
@@Omgiamsotriggeredno. Its because canon already has a girlfriend. Stop asking them to do OF
@@Aneliuse😂😂😂😂😂
I just watched a couple of videos of why people are leaving Sony for Panasonic.... it never ends.
It looks like canon is losing the next generation of photographers,videographers and cinematographers. The sad thing is they don’t see it coming. People are starting out on EV1, A7…, A6.. and then moving on to FX3, FX6 and then fit in to big Cinema with the Venice, with Emount lenses all the way through including cinema glass. That used to be canon’s road map. Canon has killed the RF lens mount. It will never be what EF mount was it’s to late for them now. They will fall out of favor once the old timers leave. They have a terrible long term road map. They lost the documentary space already and never had the big cinema market presence. It not looking good for Canon. Their glass is too expensive to gain any traction to finance any further R&D. Business 101 customers have to buy it, like and want it. People are speaking with their wallets. Poor employees more lay-offs coming.
This video was great 🐐 doesn’t matter what camera you use or what anybody’s opinion is… you always make incredible art & have VALID points!
The biggest reason is marketing. Canon's hardware is fantastic, to me the best in the industry. But Sony goes after RUclipsrs and influencers HARD... like way harder than all other camera companies combined. Sony has some decent specs in their cams, but when I've actually tried them, I just don't like them all that much.
Also, people have been brainwashed into the whole "Sony listens to its customers and Canon doesn't" which is hogwash. Sony still has really bad LCDs from 15 years ago. Their menus are "OK" but they refused to listen to customers when it came to things like Firmwares, etc too. Meanwhile since Canon first put out the R, every new iteration has been answering most the requests that customers have had. The R5 from when it was released to where it was a couple years later was SO different. From added Clog 3 (R6 as well), to adding dual video recording (R6 too), to new codecs and bitrates, and actually fixing the overheating issue on the R5. Then the R6 II came out and addressed almost all of the shortcomings of the R6 original. No more record limits, no more overheating, dedicated photo/video switch, more custom modes, higher resolution, and so much more. Meanwhile Sony and Panasonic still only have 1.5x 4k60 crops for their competitors to the R6 II , and much slower photo bursts and much worse rolling shutter. Now the R5 II is out with Clog2, and new cinema codecs and a lot more.
And the third party glass is starting to come slowly... at least for APSC. Meanwhile the great news is that unlike Nikon or Sony, Canon's DSLR glass adapts perfectly with no downsides and work as well as native RF glass in most cases.
Who really cares about global shutter outside of the 3 people that need to shoot photos with flash in the sun. It has way more negatives than positives at this point.
The "Sony is all marketing," line is copium. The R5 got updates because they launched an early-access product that literally didn't do the thing it said it could do. I mean it did. For 5 minutes before it had to cool down for 45 minutes. The R had terrible autofocus, terrible battery life and one card slot at launch. It was essentially an A7II. It's not okay that they've cut out third-parties. There's no road-map for third-parties on full-frame but it's okay because it takes old lenses. Why buy the new system, then? Their lenses consistently cost more than the competition and are made of plastic. These are things that should bother you. This is a grift, and you're a mark.
@boundaryscience sony and canon quality is basically the same at the end of the day. Sony will always be more expensive when it comes to lenses and the lenses aren't worth the higher price. Many old old EF lenses are still going strong after many years. I know videoogrpahers that use Canon bc yes the cameras have a plastic body but that's lighter on a gimbal. Not to mention sonys video editing software has always been subpar. To say canon is better than sony or sony is better than canon is all opinions and preference at this point. The differences are very small and each manufacturer have cameras for different purposes.
Sony is just better than canon at video, and imo photography. The only people who stick with canon are people who care more about the camera body itself over the final product.
@@Yupthereitism Sony cameras are metal body and too heavy for most gimbals most videographers run Canon or cinema box cameras.
"Decent specs" I had to pause reading that. Sony is usually the first with new technology. Look how long it took canon to get mirrorless cameras and stacked sensors. A9iii this year has global shutter. The one thing sony drags their feet with is with firmware updates. Other companies are way better at that.
Very chill and nice looking video. Thanks for the explanation! First time on this channel and I love it already.
Canon as Apple is certainly true. Waiting for a decent price on the A7c 2 to try it.
Renting is also a great option!
Great video. I am actually a Canon R6ii use it right now and I'm very happy with my camera. However, I am very much infatuated with the different looks of Nikon and Sony which is why I purchased a Z6 and also an A7 3, both used. I wanted to test the systems and then make my decision of where to go full fledged.
Then as I get more Savvy into the system, I realize that the lens options from third-party companies is really only fluent within Sony and Nikon. So this is why I am going to be leaving Canon as soon as I can. Right now though I am looking for a replacement for the a7iii because I'm not going to keep it. I know it is notorious for the shudder crashing on its users and I don't want to deal with that at all. I need help right now figuring out what camera would be best to buy for being able to do my vlogging and also commercials for restaurants and food reviews. I will also need it to do amazing portraits indoors and Outdoors as well. Basically I need a Workhorse at the most economical cost since I'm going to have to buy 2 cameras.
I’m on LUMIX S5II and I love the improvements they did on the camera. Yes it has a crop at 60 but for 2k you can beat it. I was thinking about Sony but I feel like there menu system is complicated and will be a learning curve. I’m hoping LUMIX does something dope with the S1H soon. Sony cameras are dope though.
Thank you! S5IIX owner here! Dudes really be sleeping on Panasonic like seriously 😂🔥🤝🫂
@@musadays8083 they have made moves to move up on the list. The AF is solid and could be rubbing shoulders with Sony
I am sure the S1H II is going to be great, but I think it is going to be pretty darn expensive. What I really hoped is that Panasonic would release a Lumix version of the a7S II: Basically, a 12 (or 16)MP sensor with a fast readout speed that can deliver 4K 60p uncropped and 4K 120 with a SLIGHT crop. I would assume that Panasonic COULD pull that off for the $2,500 mark. Is it relevant now in late summer of 2024??? Not sure others would be down, but for me, it would be great. (Having said all that, I do like my S5 IIX quite a bit).
I used the original S5 for 3 years and S5II for a bit as well and the new Sony menus are better than LUMIX. Figured out the FX30 menu fast and remembered things, S5 even after 3 years I would still have to dig.
Lumix always gives the best bang for your buck. If the GH7 is a sign of what the S2H will be we are in for a treat.
Went from Nikon to Sony in 2012, I never looked back! Bought FS700 in 2013 with Odyssey 7Q Monitor for RAW shooting. A7Riii in 2018 for 2nd cam and photography. A7Siii in 2023 for smaller ergonomics and internal 10bit codecs. The consistency with matching 3 cams through the Odyssey 7Q around my shoots has been fantastic. Looking at your A7Cii setup for compact shoots, intriguing. Thanks for your insight!
If Sony didn't feel like holding a computer up to my eyes, I might be in to them. But they're a consumer electronics company that just bought up camera tech companies and people and slapped their own brand on 'em. Happy to have them out there as competition to make everyone better, but the products are soulless.
Bro it’s exactly how I feel it’s crazy
felt the same while handling a sony a6700 and a fujifilm xs20. but camera is just a tool and Sony just works the best.
I've only got back into things this year. I'm a hobbyist. I got a used A6000 for like $300 and loved it. But immediately fell into the hype of Fuji 100vi. Got it. Didn't like the lens stuff, so I sold it back, grabbed the X-T5. Love this camera. Can work with it.
But have been peeking over the wall at Sony for video reasons. Your post really helped solidify my thinking .
All professional users will use canon. That’s just a fact. But……. Sony on that a$$… I was looking into Sony the other day. I just love my r6 mark 2 and r5 c.
Sony is the standard for video and photo now. Pretty much every corporate shoot I see now is with a Sony. Canons are for casuals and Sony is for professionals.
true havent see any sony professionals in Olympics 😂 i have sony but canon is still the best for sports, wildlife motosports etc
The way you make these video is so dope dude. So easy to listen to someone and trust what they're saying when every shot is that fkn beautiful haha
The problem is other sony and nikon doesn't have good hybrids. A74 with trash cropped 4k aint working, A7s3, FX3 don't do good photos, yeah they shoot but 12mp is for 2002 days. While Z8 being good alternative hybrid to R5 or R5ii, z8 shitty screen, mediocre AF and REC2020 color space for NRAW ain't working for me. Z8 does overheat. Its not that famous in overheating as less people are using it. While there's these high resolution cousin of A74 like A7R5 or A7R4 are there, sony capped the video features, mediocre noise performance and codec features. The OG R5 had bad codecs but usability wise there's not a true hybrid that can still replace the OG R5. We are 99% satisfied with the camera, no issues, can shoot amazing photos and videos. Sony's hybrid path is long gone as they made 2 paths for video and photo. If they implement good hybrid on future A75 it will kill, A7R5, A7SIII, FX3, FX9 and burano. Even z8 sweep most of the floors of these cameras. C400 with triple base iso and RAW features wrecked Burano to its depths. Now Z6III with 6k raw😅😅 future for sony is hard. And nikon implementing all RED tech to its camera😊. So yeah we cant own seperate camera for photo and video so we dont care about Sony's caped video only camera.
The r5 can only shoot clips, overheating is terrible. The lenses are also lacking
Create! Just one thing to be fair I always see you using EF lenses not RF so auto focus might lack a little but! As well just keep teaching and creating you are a big inspiration to me always
I've been Canon for the longest time... but feels like the time is coming to switch over....
This is probably the worst time to do it. with all the new stuff coming. 2018- early 2020 was best to switch
Mate, I’ve come to a point in my career where brand loyalty’s not the be-all and end-all anymore. I’m a part-time interior and real estate photographer while working full-time as a valuer here in Australia. Most of my clients don’t really give two hoots about camera specs, but they do seem to stick with brand names. My first pro camera was a Canon 5D2, and I busted my chops to get all the f2.8 zooms for the EF mount, plus a bunch of primes like the 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, and 100mm. Back then, about 10-12 years ago, Canon was the dream, and I held onto that gear for years.
Fast forward to today, I’m still using my EF lenses, but I’ve moved away from Canon professionally. My current setup revolves around Fuji - rocking the XT5 and XH2S with booster adapters for my full-frame EF zooms, and some EF APS-C glass as well. My go-to combo these days is the Fuji body paired with a Tokina EF 11-16mm f2.8 and Sigma 18-35mm f1.8. I still carry the Canon 70-200mm and 50mm f1.8 in the bag, just in case.
I’ve dabbled with Sony too - still break out my original A7 for interior shots when the client needs them. But picking Fuji was more about the dollars and sense than getting caught up in specs. I’ve used the XT3 and XT4 before my current setup, bought them brand new, and after tax deductions, I even managed to sell them at a profit. Not heaps, but enough to pretty much score a free laptop thanks to the tax break. I do like Sony - have rented the FX3 and A7R5s for those high-end jobs - but I just can’t see the same tax perks with Sony as I do with Fuji. And don’t even get me started on the Fuji fanboys - they’re a whole other level!
Canon user here for 30 years, own two R5's and loads of RF glass, and gotta say that Canon deserve a lot of hate for their arrogant attitude towards customers. 30 minute record limits on the R5, banning 3rd party lenses and now stopping third party battery compatibility with the R5 MK2 smacks of a company that is in a war against its customers rather than helping them to create better content.
I left Canon years ago when year after year, they refused to improve the dynamic range of their sensors. I know their sensors are fine now, but I see they are still slow as mollases in responding to customer requested features.
I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. Can the SLog3 be color graded to match with Canon's rich and eye catching color science?
@@TravAlligator i have been searching for a camera for a month now. if you buy it now, Canon R6 ii is really balanced, there is Nikon Z6 iii at just a bit higher price range (in my country it is so high that I just gave up on Nikon). If you want to get a Sony for full frame, either get a7cii (for its compactness) or wait for a7 V. I think it will be released until the end of Q1 2025 the latest. Though Canon R6 Mark 3 might also be released, Sony a7 V will probably more up-to-date newer features.
@@zaporoshti3392 Yes A7V or Canon R6 III would be great options if they are coming soon. How about Sony FX30 II or FX3 II? If they come I'll jump and buy one of them.
@@TravAlligator Sony waits 3 years between each version of a model. Therefore, FX3 might get an update after 1 year, for FX30 it might take 2 years. When released a7V will probably a very up-to-date camera.
I’ve got a way older Canon so selling it won’t get me enough to upgrade to a different system. Just saving money and watching videos like this to figure out if I should switch when I’ve got enough!
As a hobbyist/part time photographer, I left Canon and went back to Sony because Canon RF mounts are prohibatively expensive to build out a kit. Sony has an extensive third party and used selection. I still prefer Canon's ergonomics, and the menus probably are a bit more intuitive. But really Sony lets me actually build my kit and get the photos I need to get, without selling a kidney.
Although it is taking time, at least Canon is finally starting to open up to 3rd parties again. Just have to continue to wait.
Still not stopping me from going to a LUMIX S5II tho… lol! I’ll keep my canon gear though as I do enjoy the more intuitive menu system, as you mentioned. I’m just used to it.
I Appreciate the knowledge y'all be dropping. I brought a Sony a6400 as my first camera w/ 18-135 kit lens, I'm currently filming a short film with it and I have no filmmaking experience besides watching you guys videos.
Been with Canon since 2008 and never switching to another system.
Stockholm syndrome.
You are missing out
@@Raytrace3Dee😂😂😂
Not me buddy, Im currently using the the R6, and for my business, the R6 is just perfect, I switched to Sony a couple times and I ended coming back to canon, Sony just doesn't feel good in my hands lol, colors are way different, so I sold all of the Sony gear and bought the R6, and about to buy the R5 for a main camera and the R6 as a back up, your video was great.
I just got rid of all my canon gear now I'm going with Panasonic
Why is that
Aside from the content you provided, I was digging the variation of shots. Very nice to see
There are 4 reasons why Sony has won (talking about fx3 over other canon cameras):
1) 12800 ISO noiseless
2) no overheating
3) no crop on 4k slowmotion
4) Not limited to third parties E-mount like the RF
and they did everything else right. They fixed the colors with the S-log3, they have one of best autofocus, they fixed the menu, they fixed the battery life, they made a good camera.
Panasonic had all the chances to get some market share with S5II and x, but 1) Crop on slowmotion 2) not much choice for lenses 3) still baaad autofocus 4) not 5 axis stabilization like sony's
well the IBIS from Lumix is waaaaay better than the sonys, like a galaxy away. The rest is true though
@@FraneFilmsyes. it is smoother, I have a s5ii also and I like the stab more than fx3. but have you seen the footage on lumix if you put a 18mm lens? You know why the edges wobble? It's that 5th axis, which Lumix doesn't have.
I think you make many valid points but for my line of work (shooting live events) I'm still using oldies but goodies ( Sony's FS7 II, Canon's C500 II & C70). since my clients still can't tell the difference between my FS7s & C70s, wouldn't make sense for us. I'll just keep watching your videos and living vicariously through you.
If/when sony gets canon's market share, they won't care as much. Happens to all companies.
Dude, they're already starting. They're careening wildly into Playstation 3 launch territory. Always go with third-place if you can. That's why I have Sony AND Nikon. Nikon's just trying harder and my Sony lenses work just fine on it.
THIS! their gear is mad soulless, people are gonna complain about everything when honestly you can create content with most cameras these days
@Jamaican55 what makes gear soulless? Aside from the fact that it is an inanimate object.
I'm so with you on this.. I have canon and sony.. R3, R5C, R6mkii, c200, and 1dxmk ii... Sony A7RV, A74, A7Siii, and FX30.. It's really interesting that Sony has made me disappointed with Canon gear. I used to love Canon. Now I find myself not really touching my canon gear because of the weight, AF (not as good), I really only use my Canon gear when I want to "look" special. lol. Sony doesn't have a visual wow factor., but the 16-35GM and 35-150mm is a game changer for events.
I’ve switched from canon to Sony 7 months ago and I’m never looking back.
i gave my sony to my maid cause i dont like it
I said that when the 5D II came out. Never know what will happen; Nikon bought RED and is getting serious about cinema. They probably will adapt RED RAW + sensor tech & color science into a mirrorless in the next few years. The RED RAW is true RAW, its way different than anyone's but Arri.
Great video! Love hearing your perspective on things. I have been a Canon user for over 20 years and don't see myself making a shift away fully. I've used sony several times over my career and always end up back at Canon. I use an R5 for my daily work and content creation and I love it. I do a mix of photo and video and I personally have never encountered overheating or anything like that even on longer shoots. I do think Sony makes some amazing gear and they have come along way. A lot of the numbers, I think, come from the flood of "content creators" and people buying Sony to make youtube channels or film stuff for IG. But I agree that Sony has been better about innovating and listening to the users.
At the end of the day we use what fits us best and what we are most comfortable with. As I said, I will stick wtih Canon for what I do and rent gear as needed for bigger projects. It all depends on how we work and what we are doing. But if you are good at what you do, you can get a great image out of almost any camera these days,
Simple reason: Sony hit us with full-frame, 4k, and low light performance with more people (creators) showing love for the Sony brand name. It looked cleaner and sharper even if the color wasn't as good as Canon. Canon had/has better color, but Sony looks pro and with some color correction, it looks better.
I'm not sure the time of day or what ND filter but the dynamic range in the first couple of clips is fire!
Switched to Sony coming from canon..BEST DECISION OF MY LIFE
I'm still working with the C70 and R5C for my outdoor survival and camping videos. You're right about everything today being great, gear wise. Can't wait to see what's available in 10 years.
Actually switched from Canon to Sony in May got a Sony A7RV & Sony FX3. I loved Canon but I don’t regret the switch at all! The low light & auto focus with Sony is hard to beat!
I keep battling between Sony and Canon as my next Full Frame camera. I love all the Sony features except the color science. Can the SLog3 be color graded to match with Canon's rich and eye catching color science?
@@TravAlligatoryes just add a small amount of magenta during corrections and viola
Great vid and addressed a lot of the things that frustrate me about canon. Only reason I haven't switched is because the R6 is the first camera I feel like I don't need to upgrade for what I do. It's so fast and nice to use and the images and video are amazing. I also used a Sony (a7r3) once and just didnt like it. The screen was awful, the autofocus was not great and the overall usability of the camera didn't feel as smooth and fast to use and don't even get me stated on that menu system. It was however very nice to hold and the images that came out of that thing were insane (when in focus). I just prefer a more smooth and intuitive user experience because otherwise I'm missing shots that could be bangers. Coming from Fuji to Canon I realised just how important that was.
Off-topic, man i love the color grade on your outdoor scenes - killed it!
SONY is the Goat... simple mathematics
Well said! I turned on Canon when Canon turned on me. The lack of ability to purchase third party lenses was a decisive issue for me. This policy followed the lack of Windows 11 support for a long-held but still very useful Canon printer, i.e. no updated driver. You can get me cranky once, but don't do it twice or you are dead to me.
I got my first DSLR (Canon Rebel T6) senior year of high school in late 2017 and I've been rocking with Canon ever since. I mostly use my camera for hobby photo/video stuff for fun, would like to do more production/paid work with it but I've had more success with remote video editing so I don't need the latest and greatest camera right now. I upgraded from the T6 to a 90d a few years ago and even though it's still a DSLR, I've loved using it. Would love to upgrade to a mirrorless like the lumix s5 ii or canon r7 or one of the many sony options, but it's just not worth the investment for me. Good vid enjoyed the breakdown of both brands here
I’m on my way out as well. 7+ years. I’ve been waiting for updates and gear innovation. Can’t wait around
I really liked the location switches throughout this video journey of well spoken thoughts :)
"Sony's autofocus is stickier than Canon's"
Welp...you've lost me right here. This is certainly a...shall we say..."unique" perspective.
I needed to see this! It’s great to know I wasn’t the only one holding on to Canon. I agree with so many points, especially for full-time RUclips & content creation-Sony just makes our lives SO MUCH EASIER! Keep grinding bro! Much respect!
Bro, I love your videos and you’ve taught me SO much over the past 5 years since I’ve been watching, but as someone who cares, this wireless mic you’ve been using ain’t it. Just my two cents but you have a voice that keeps my attention but recently you haven’t sounded the same. I seriously thought my phone speakers were going bad bc you sounded so compressed. You have a pleasing voice but that wireless mic is anything but complimentary for you. Maybe it’s the ease of use, maybe hollyland is paying you, either and any way I’m sure there’s a reason but I’m just not feeling it. 😂 I know we aren’t friends like that but I’m just looking out.
I appreciate you immensely and love the content, please keep it coming. You inspire and motivate so many of us. Thank you
It's really just easy to keep consistent audio, tryna make it as easy as possible!
Really loved the style and the content of this video.
Well done. Very refreshing.
Talented in front of the camera as well. Very authentic.
Respect.
By the way. After 16 years I switched to Nikon in 2017/18. In 2020 i switched to Sony. Never looked back.
I’m rocking the a7cii as well, for the same reasons you mentioned, for me it’s the right tool for the job rn🔥
I am a canon camera user and I choose to be because I love the menu system and the camera is nice. I don’t really like the current mount system but that is because I started with EF and as it stands I don’t really see a need to go mirrorless right now. But with the way things are mirrorless is the wave. If I had to go mirrorless I would consider canon first just because I have a lot of Ef lens… but I really like Nikon in that market and the medium format camera are extremely versatile but pricey. Sony is great and I like the fact the mount is consistent but I am only speaking from stills only… great video and great content… maybe if I was in the creative RUclips industry I would see more of it from you point of view…
Excellent thanks! I reached tipping point (to Sony) in 2023 for similar reasons. Thank you for keeping the mosquito in the cut 👍
Today was my first time checking out one of your RUclips videos and I must say you did an excellent job of explaining your point of view on the two camera systems. Liked and subbed. 💯📸🙏💪
This is so well said - I think you hit the nail on the head in the first minute... camera's have plateaued (which is not a bad thing!) and there's not a bad camera out there. I, personally, prefer and enjoy the Canon ecosystem better than Sony (as a Sony A7IV owner) - but they're both amazing. Another great video, man!
I’m literally selling my canon gear to switch to Sony and the A7c II is the one I have been considering. Thanks for this video! Def sold me on it and made me confident in my choice.
Thanks for your insight on an interesting topic. I've been in the Canon ecosystem for almost 10 years. I would have to make a bold move to switch brands due to my lens collection. It can be done, but it's a bigger step for some. I will be keeping my eyes open on new tech for cameras going forward...