Rolex Oyster Perpetual 39 114300 Rolex Watch Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 сен 2024
  • Contact Team Mosso for pricing and availability; Either I have it, or I can get it!
    Email: tmosso@thewatchbox.com
    Phone: 610-632-5307
    Shop this watch: bit.ly/3PoQtiL
    Shop all Rolex watches: bit.ly/3QRrM07
    SKU: 4705117
    The Rolex Oyster Perpetual 114300 is encased in 39mm of stainless steel surrounding a blue dial on a stainless steel Oyster bracelet. Features of this Rolex Oyster Perpetual include hours, minutes, and seconds. This Rolex watch also measures 11.2mm in thickness and 47.3mm from lug-to-lug.
    For complete details, watch the full Rolex Oyster Perpetual 39 review by Tim Mosso!
    Please subscribe to our channel for the best luxury watch reviews on RUclips: www.youtube.co...
    Visit our website at www.thewatchbox.com for the latest pre-owned luxury watch arrivals and industry-leading value in previously loved luxury timepieces.

Комментарии • 27

  • @matt2m
    @matt2m Год назад +4

    I’m so happy. I just worked bell to bell delivered a car to a customer 240 miles away and drove back. I should go to sleep but I have this exact watch reserved 4 hours south. This video hyped me up so f it I’ll sleep when I die. Coffee is for closers!!!

  • @augustojoseramonpinochetug5235
    @augustojoseramonpinochetug5235 Год назад +4

    Got it new from the AD with a 10% discount back in 2016, still enjoying it to this day

  • @henrywest7217
    @henrywest7217 2 года назад +14

    I like the 39s better than the 41s.

  • @Thankyou_3
    @Thankyou_3 2 года назад +8

    What a perfect size.

  • @koolpep
    @koolpep 2 года назад +5

    I sold that exact model to Watchbox in December 2019 - that was before the craze and I regret it ever since 🙂

    • @itsKNR
      @itsKNR 10 месяцев назад +1

      I will buy this model this month but i will have to pay 8.300 Euro thats roughly 8.800 Dollar. But its a beautiful watch

  • @MillerVanDotTV
    @MillerVanDotTV Год назад +2

    These were perfection. Especially when you could get them lightly used for $4000 or sometimes even less.

  • @chasp_0784
    @chasp_0784 2 года назад +4

    Lovely reference, the rhodium dial is my favourite though

    • @Moe90rules
      @Moe90rules 2 года назад +1

      my favorite is the 39mm OP white dial version!

    • @augustojoseramonpinochetug5235
      @augustojoseramonpinochetug5235 Год назад +3

      Was debating btw this and the rhodium. Settled on this because the rhodium has little contrast btw the dial and hands making time telling difficult in certain lighting situations

  • @Danfranco
    @Danfranco Год назад +3

    The best rolex

  • @rickclark4714
    @rickclark4714 7 месяцев назад +1

    Like all watches over $1000, it should have a micro adjust clasp, no tool needed.

  • @plostyle786
    @plostyle786 2 года назад

    Everyone wanted entry to the club but nobody wanted to pay the price. Hence the rise of the steel sports watch, it was the cheapest ticket into the club. Eventually I think the steel sports club will be over saturated and people will be looking to join the next club which is the precious metal club.

  • @beng7004
    @beng7004 2 года назад

    Over priced but a nice watch

  • @marcoganz6276
    @marcoganz6276 2 года назад +7

    Too big. Lume only at 3,6,9. Weird green squares at the end of the indices. The OP 36mm ref. 116000 instead is the perfect watch.

    • @KeepingWatchUK
      @KeepingWatchUK 2 года назад +7

      Nah. Sizing is fine for those of us with wrists >6”

    • @marcoganz6276
      @marcoganz6276 2 года назад +1

      @@KeepingWatchUK Above 36mm is not a watch anymore, unless it has a bezel, like a diver. In that case 38mm. My wrist is 18.7cm - 7.4 inches. It's cultural, but you don't see it.

    • @chasp_0784
      @chasp_0784 2 года назад +3

      @@marcoganz6276 yes and as a different culture we have settled on larger watches being the right size for us. No such thing as a perfect watch

    • @marcoganz6276
      @marcoganz6276 2 года назад

      @@chasp_0784 I don't agree with that. IMO it's not relative. Oversized, heavy and chunky is just ridiculous. Not a wrist watch anymore.

    • @chasp_0784
      @chasp_0784 2 года назад +5

      @@marcoganz6276 of course you don’t agree but it’s just your opinion, which means nothing