Trailers For Morbius Completely Mislead The Audience Says Report
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- Please support the sponsors of today's show
HELLOFRESH - Go To www.hellofresh.... and use the promo code CAMPEA16 for 16 free meals
Watch the full episode this clip is from here:
• Did Morbius Trailers L...
Viewer Question:
James - The early word on Morbius is hitting and it's not good.Besides most reactions painting a bleak sign of the quality of the film.Reports are revealing that pretty much all ties to a larger Spider Universe have been cut from the movie.Everything in the trailers including all Michael Keaton's scenes are gone except for one different Keaton bit as a tag.I'm seeing angry reactions of being tricked into seeing a bad movie via false advertising of a Spiderman Universe film.Do you think this thinking holds water?
Leave a question when you tip at streamelements... and it will be answered on the Mail Bag show. (Remember, you are submitting a TIP to support the channel. You are not "buying" a question to be on the show. We're happy to answer the questions or comments you submit with your tips, but we reserve the right to not air any question or comment if we consider it inappropriate, unconstructive or disruptive to the flow of the show).
JOHN’S GEAR LINKS
Main Cameras
Sony A6400 - amzn.to/2VsMMyx
Sony A6600 - amzn.to/3bbfivl
Canon XC15 - amzn.to/3abgZY8
Mic pre-amps
Cloudlifter - amzn.to/3ckgvRa
Good Cheaper Cameras John Uses
Canon Vixia R800 - amzn.to/2yfa8zI
Logitech c920 Webcam - amzn.to/3eiul8m
Main Microphones
Rode Procaster - amzn.to/3cum1AT
Good Cheaper Mics John Uses Sometimes
Audio-Technica ATR2100x (usb and xlr) - amzn.to/34FSIID
Blue Yeti (usb) - amzn.to/2XyVZb8
Lapel Mic
FiFine (usb) - amzn.to/2VvzocW
Shotgun Mics
Rode VideoMic GO (small on camera mic) - amzn.to/34A3YX0
Rode NTG2 (main Studio mic) - amzn.to/2REkH6d
Sennheiser MKE 600 (main Studio mic) - amzn.to/3eo5boY
Soundboard/Mixer
RODEcaster Pro (main) (usb) - amzn.to/2RzozFC
Behringer Xenyx 1204USB (backup board) - amzn.to/2yf8VZn
Streaming Software
Wirecast Pro
Wirecast Control Surface - amzn.to/34DzjrG
Lights
Nanlite Lumipad 25 (main studio lights) - amzn.to/2XAeVXd
Neewer Ring Light (secondary lights) - amzn.to/2RDRoAP
FalconEyes F7 Pocketlite (background color lights) - amzn.to/3emBgNT
Selfie Ring - (guest light) - amzn.to/3a6esOZ
Show Notes Computer
iPad Pro 2020 - amzn.to/34ALhCA
Submit your topic or question for The John Campea Show here:
www.thejohncamp...
Follow John on Instagram:
/ johncampea
![Cody Johnson - I'm Gonna Love You (with Carrie Underwood) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yy9PuYMU29g/mqdefault.jpg)
I have 0 faith in Sony's Villian Spider-Verse. The first venom was a very mediocre movie, the second was even worse. So, going with the IF TRUE assumption, none of this surprises me.
Venom was bad but still very enjoyable. Especially the second one. Bad but enjoyable=Amazing!
@@axionlightedge6108 it’s forgettable af especially when they can’t even give the protagonist a fucking character arc which is the most fundamental thing u need for a movie I don’t get how god damn amateur these people worked on that r
They're not even real villains. They want to market all of them as antihero. The only villain is Toomes but even he doesn't wanna kill spiderman anymore.
Situations like this are why that Ana De Armas lawsuit needed to happen and deserves to change things in Hollywood. 🤷🏽♂️
I get it but Ana Armas that thing is ridiculous, that case is absolute nonsense, the whole Yesterday campaign wasn't based on that actress, thats More like Hulk not being in Infinite War! This is a very different situation
Um… what situation was Ana De Armas in? This is new news for me. Mind explaining?
@@offspringfan1288 she was included in the trailers and promo for the film “Yesterday” but then her scenes weren’t in the movie. So fans of hers filed a lawsuit saying it was false advertisement and they only bought tickets to see her. They did a video on it.
AnointedFlow It is nonsense. They didn’t do it to drive sales, otherwise they would’ve just kept the scenes in.
No, they decided to cut the scene for quality reasons and the marketing company (completely different from the studio) already included a couple shots of her.
That ana de armas lawsuit is utter bullshit.
I will never understand why John is excited for this film. It’s looked bad since 2020
If this is true, they really hit the nail on the head with April 1st release date. This movie really would be a joke
You thought the trailers looked Great? That’s surprisingly. I thought this movie was a dumb idea to even make and then on top of that looked awful lol
Maybe SM:NWH was so powerful the multiverse really did crack and changed the actual script 😂
Nothing to be surprised here. I expected nothing less from sony. Reminds me of TASM 2.
Nah, it reminds me of LTBC and Homecoming trilogy including NWH.
@@JohnnyTheGamer Homecoming trilogy were made by Marvel Studios, Sony only distributed it
I mean why would anyone care about a Morbius film if it's not remotely connected to any spiderverse. Like Morbius isnt even a top 10 Spidey villian, this movie is just a super odd choice by Sony.
Cuz Sony sucks and they're tryna do what Warner Brothers did with Joker solo but they couldn't make half a movie as good as that was.If they hadn't screwed up with Andrew Garfield he'd still be the main Spider-Man so now they're making solo movies with his enemies.They got lucky with Venom bcuz those were watchable but they weren't MCU level good by any means so I know the other ones they'll attempt won't be any good
End Credits “APRIL FOOLS!” In large print
AND we know Sony would pull that Bullshit too.
HahAhaHaha!!!
The fact that John can see those trailers and think they indicate this will be a great film puts his critic-credentials into serious question. Those trailers make it look like this will be a boring mess of a movie.
Facts the movie looks alright at best and you know what’s worse? He thinks that Ms. Marvel trailer that came out was great also… I kind of want know what kind of drugs is he on right now lol
@@ZACLAND21 Ms Marvel has an appeal and a specific audience of younger fans, fan of morbious are spiderman fans and morbius does not look good
I lost excitement for this movie the minute I saw the writers for it. Sony always does that. They treat their IPs like its shit: MIB international, Andrew's Spiderman, Uncharted, Venom etc. What did you expect to see in this movie when it's written by the same writers of... um, let's see: Gods Of Egypt, Dracula Untold, Power Rangers and The Last Witch Hunter (Personally I don't think these movies are the worst thing ever or unwatchable but still...).
And BTW these two guys who wrote Morbius are also writing Madame Web. Apparently, Sony is RUN by corporate suits and not top execs who understand the biz. It's mind-boggling because they USE the same 10 writers for EVERY ONE OF THEIR UPCOMING PROJECTS. Like the worst screen credits man... WHY? WHYYYY? And I'm not done yet.
The precious Kraven movie that's coming do you know who is writing that thing? From the writers of Punisher WarZone, Transformers the Last Knight, Uncharted (cohesive mess), Expendables 2, Agents of Shield WTF. Seriously every time I see a topic about a SONY movie I'm starting to lose it. The worst blockbusters come from them. THANK YOU KEVIN FEIGE FOR SAVING SPIDERMAN FROM THESE MORONS who can't even write a 3 act movie let alone a 3 part movie franchise...
EDIT: I agree with ROB 100%. This was so mediocre that probably Kevin and Amy had to delay it and just chop it down. Keaton is only in the post-credit because now he is supposed to be a tease. That's it. Jared pls man get out of there quickly cuz you deserve better superhero movies.
Lol 😆
it looks like even Sony themselves knows morbius is shit. and if what you say is right, then why do they keep the same writers for their next project? unless its nepotism, i don't understand it
I agree after the Raimi Trilogy when Sony is left unchecked they take the Spidey Franchise to the ground
@@rocket4359 I DONT KNOW MAN. Honestly I don't know why they hire the same morons :D who can't write a proper movie?
@@keving5004 Madame Web, Kraven and apparently Morbius are going to be written by the same guys. Im gonna make a wild bet here. This Venomverse is going to bomb hard for SONY. I expect a bigger trainwreck than the DCEU: Begins. These movies will be so unstructured, so bad that will keep Tom Holland far away from them for at least 7-8 years.
Barely any ads with it coming out next week plus an embargo this close to release. I smell a stinker.
Poor Jared Leto, first The Joker in Suicide Squad and now Morbius 😮
I hope 'this is not true'!
Jared Leto has terrible luck with comic book movies
Bro Jared can’t catch a break with these comic book movies. He’s been screwed over by both DC AND Marvel now. Jesus.
I know the poor guy and he’s a fucking great actor. At least he’s doing great with his series WeCrashed!
@@jessmwells793 What is the series about?
@@Dave102693 Hiya! It’s about the WeWork Founders and the rise and fall of the company. It’s based on true events but Leto is awesome in it.
@@jessmwells793 I never of the company before. What was the company about ?
@@Dave102693 it’s a commercial real estate company and they pretty much share and lease workspace with other businesses and brands. I never heard of it either but I watched a documentary and RUclips videos about it and if you’re into that stuff it’s pretty interesting.
If you’ve ever taken a drink from a soda can with a cigarette butt in it, you’ll always remember. And in the back of your mind, you’re always checking your soda cans first before you go in for a drink.
😂
If this film were set in the MCU, wouldn’t it have the Marvel Studios intro and logo?
Bingo.
@@Antonio_Ortiz That’s what I thought, though Michael Keaton had me going “maybe it is?”. It’s obvious it’s set in Tom Hardy’s Venom verse, as the upcoming Aaron Taylor-Johnson led Kraven The Hunter film will as Sony are lusting for a Sinister Six film since they ruined TASM 2 with all that setup for a Sinister Six film.
Connected to the larger MCU or not, I was never excited for this movie. When I first heard it was being made, I just thought "Why?"
Let’s be honest, the movie sucks and Sony knows it.
They're saying that even Jared Leto has spoken on behalf of the project, saying that some things will be mind blowing once audiences are sitting in theaters... What if Jared have already seen the movie or most of it, then talks about the surprising stuff but during those statements the studio decided to re-edit the film and Jared or the rest of the cast don't know anything about it??
I think what could have happened is the fact that this movie was supposed to be released 2 years ago before venom 2 and before Spider-Man no way home. But now that it's coming out after the fact the connective tissue has changed and maybe they had to remove some things cuz it doesn't make sense in the timeline anymore.
And in the theatre Sony will say ha April fools... Then you realize that we were the punchline...
This would be the ultimate bait and switch
Still don't know why anyone at any point would've given a single crap about this movie honestly. Like I hope all this stuff is true because I want Sony's subpar movies as far away from the MCU as possible. Expecting Sony to have a plan after their track record are care about quality is just setting yourself up for disappointment
Imagine being John and HATING Hawkeye, but thinking Morbius looks good 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ericericson5633 Troll elsewhere, kid.
@@OrangeHand How is that a troll?
@@Alice-me2qk If you look at his other comments, it's quite apparent.
@@OrangeHand I wasn't asking about his other comments I was asking about your response to his MoS comment in this thread. If your response stems from other comments in this comment section that he's posted outside of the thread then you should've specified.
And your response to my very simple question was very low effort considering that you could've just explained to me why you though his comment was a troll. But instead you simply replied that his other unrelated comments would make his more relevant comment apparent, as if you'd expect me to sift through the comment section and draw my own conclusion about why you thought his MoS comment was a troll when you could've simply explained it to me yourself.
Accurate, just saw it and a lot of clips aren’t in the film or are changed
That's lame on Sonys part. I thought Venom, Morbius and Garfields Spidey being in the same universe made so much sense.
How?
Explains the April 1st release though
The worst part is that people will very much blame Jared Leto for some stupid reason, considering he's film twitter's punching bag.
If I remember correctly in the first trailer there was murderer written over the spiderman poster... and as you said the movie was delayed again and again.
I can't help but get the feeling that the Plan for Morbius was to be released bedore no way home narrarively for him being still blamed on Mysterios death...
What if most of the connective tissue was just nullified because no way home simply moved on?
I know... it doesn't explain Letos comment or the last Trailer, but as we know Studios aren't allways aware if the Marketing and actors often doesn't really know what is going Produktion wise at all.
My first thought was poor Leto.
I really like this dude and after he was screwed over by DC with that cut Joker part I really hoped he gets a better treatment over at Sony.
Lets hope he can Ryan Reynolds the Situation and find a perfect pic in the next years.
Because I really would like to see more of this without a doubt talented guy on the big comic screen.
I actually never cared if it's connected to Spiderman or not, I just want to see a good Morbius movie.
And Sony even manages to spectacularly screw that up. Wonderful!
@@MrGlenbw We'll see.
I would rather watch a Green Goblin prequel movie showing Norman Osborn in his youth and explain his past. The scene where Norman reads the newspaper about himself reveals a lot of character backstory if you pause and read it, quite interesting information never touched on. The movie or series could tell us how he built his company, what were the sacrifices he made, what his relationship was like with Harry (baby-pre teen years). Explain how he met his wife and what led to the end of their relationship. Why did she go after his trust fund like a pack ravening wolves 😂? Introduce a young Otto and show how he met Norman and became good friends. Show us why the general was so eager to put Norman out of business and why the board of directors disliked him. What happened prior to the Spider-Man 2002 events? Explain why Norman is arrogant and loves taking risks. Have Willem Dafoe be like the narrator and cast someone who resembles a young version of him or de-age him like they did in Aquaman. I wouldn’t mind watching something like this on Disney + or wherever.
The ending could be the beginning of where Spider-Man 2002 starts or they could show the new timeline after the events of No Way Home with a now 60 something Osborn living his best life and having a good relationship with a older Harry (if they ever allow James Franco to return) and saving his job after somehow perfecting the serum this time.
That sounds 1000% better than what Sony has been doing since 2007.
Who didnt see this coming? When they release a shit ton of SFX shots super early....that is exactly whats going to happen.
This never looked good to me tho 👀
Remember those rumors that the reshoots were to add Andrew Garfield Spider-Man lol
Poor Matt Smith....
He was the main reason I wanted to see the film, dude’s a good actor and I liked his Doctor after being a fan of David Tennant’s Doctor
@@ytuser_3122 He was personally my fav Doctor. I'm happy his performance was critically acclaimed in The Crown. I just need him to be in a good movie.
As a diehard Whovian, this is so heartbreaking... 😭😭😭
Poor Will Smith
I think when they initially made it the references were there as just a fun nod with no real linking to anything, just more as to say, "yes Spider-Man exists here." And linking it with Venom just made sense since Venom was a success, I think then when Spider-Man NWH actually fuckin' worked they were like, "shit now people want to know how this is connected and we have no fucking clue and we're still working on that." So they removed everything. I think they 100% from the jump intended for it to be connected to Venom and I believe that maybe at the time they thought they would be needing to bring in their own Spider-Man hence the references? But then after NWH because they had no real idea HOW they were going to bring Spider-Man into the Venomverse and now there was all this pressure for answers they just said, "fuck it remove it all better to take that hit than to answer nothing and disappoint everyone." Because I BET that there were 0 answers to anyone's questions about how it connected to Spider-Man, because it was never truly intended to in the first place other than to say there is one and maybe it's Tom's maybe it isn't. Hence why how everything was a hodgepodge of random Spider-Men Raimi's Bugle, Andrew's Oscorp, Tom's Vulture. They had no fuckin' idea they just knew they wanted it to be known there IS a Spider-Man so they cast a wide-ass net. Depending on when this film really started production maybe they knew about the plan to bring all the spideys into NWH so maybe they wanted to set Morbius up as a sort of launching point for anyone one of those guys for AFTER the film hence once again why there are references to so many DIFFERENT Spider-Men, but just an idea.
I haven’t heard anything about the Oscorp building being removed so maybe they left it in and they do want Andrew to be the Spiderman in that universe? It was probably too late to do actual reshoots and add him in to the movie (although they could’ve just done a post credits scene but…), so maybe they just removed the hints to the other Spider-Men, left in the one or two hints to Andrew and they’re probably hoping to bring him in to the universe in a future movie like Kraven or Venom 3 or something. And I really hope that they make The Amazing Spiderman 3 but who knows
Has it not crossed anyones mind that Disney (might of) got involved and basically said we don't want Morbius in our universe?
Disney being Disney as usual.
I allways expect to be in Venon level of quality. An ok movie. Not every movie is going to be No way Home or Endgame.
Sony can get sued for false advertising and marketing
And then Disney will take over the world!!!
Or just take back the rights to Spiderman
From here on out, Sony definitely should be rethinking their strategy with their Spiderverse. Venom 1+2 were successful not only because they’re fun movies, but because Venom is a character people know and love even without Spider-Man. Not saying Madame Web and Silk and Kraven can’t work on their own, but it really feels like they’re just throwing a project at everything they have the rights to and keeping the connections vague unless they find success in something. I have high hopes for Kraven, and the rumor that Spider-Woman could be a Marvel Studios co-production sounds cool, but I just feel like Sony is pulling a Dc by being so worried about building this interconnected universe, they’re not focusing on a solid plan and ensuring not only the quality of these projects, but if they’re even worth making as they are. I think Sony should take a page from Joker and The Batman - make really good, isolated films using your characters, and focus on just making these films as good as they can be, you can always make connections later.
If only Sony was smart enough to just make movies and not worry about anything else....like make movies about characters that haven't become relevant enough to ignore the MC of the story, to become their own characters.
To me, Let there Be Carnage was Hot Garbage and I can make an argument that the only reason the film made Half a Billion was cuz of that post credit sequence. Once that got out you saw the film exceed expectations Opening Weekend. So I would see Sony, *Like John said Big Flashing Neon IF This is True* as going, "Well we got people with a 30sec MCU teaser. So Why wouldn't we do this again?" IF IF IF TRUE, WOM is gonna be terrible. We'll start to get WOM out of the Thursday Screenings so, IF IF IF true, Opening Weekend is also at risk. Cuz if it gets out that THIS IS TRUE then I see people turning in their tickets. Again like John and Crew said, BIG FLASHING NEON IF SIGN.
I'm with Kris on this one.
Why whould anyone be looking forward to this movie? The venom movies were enjoyable but mediocre to say the least there wasn't anything in these trailers that really looked that great.
"IF TRUE" It kind of reminds me of Fan4stic! Tones of the footage in that trailer was removed which of korse had a massive impact on the final movie
if tones of that was taken out then of korse you may be correct!!
We should have seen this coming when venom was teleported too the MCU, then got kicked right the fuck out in the next movie.
Pretty much. That was a total slap to the face by Feige.
I'm not interesting in watching this movie anyway 😂😂
I rather watch Big Hero 6 being introduced in the MCU than…this…
With Michael Keaton coming back for multiple Batman movies, I would assume he has either bowed out on his own, or had this contract paid out by WB.
Idk man , those trailers never got me hyped regardless of the fake spidey references.
I'm looking forward to seeing the movie. I also wanted to say I'm a little confused about hearing the Spider-Man universe with the trailer I haven't seen any hint to begin with. Am I missing something? 🥺
To be slightly fair it was filmed before no way home back when sony was trying to shoehorn their own spider-man universe within the mcu so none of the vulture stuff would make sense now. With that being said idk why sony would double down on all these references in the trailers if they knew the final cut wasn't gonna have any of it lol
Do u really think disney/sony doesnt know about no way home ? Bruh spiderman is from sony they know what they doing both of them and if sony fails trust me disney is fuck with spiderman and all spidermans/villains from multiverse because thats from sony not disney
Yeah this is what happens when you rely on crossovers and don't stay within the story ark.
More like this is what happens when you try to make movies if bunch of unknown villains with no connection to main character.
@@shreyvaghela3963 This
Sony is sleazy for doing that. Def going to skip this "marvel" movie.
I’m up at 1am, super, super stoned in my living room watching TJS. 19:10 was the most epic shit Inever witnesses!!!!!!!
Erin confused Old Yeller and Kujo and I want to see that movie now.
You can tell when movies are going to be good or not. The fact that a movie is delayed in its production or not doesn't make a difference in the quality. For example, The Batman was delayed due to Robert Pattinson getting COVID. Morbius and Venom: Let There Be Carnage, as well as its predecessor Venom, are not going to be great movie at all - but movies of them in the future will be remarkably good if they truly try to do something on the LEVEL, not the SAME, as The Batman movie's quality.
I think / I'm hoping that whoever made this report is just fucking with us. Just trolling. I can't see them doing this. It's like social suicide.
Lying to the public is WRONG
how they decided not to use the references and stuff like that .
Releasing on April fools day for a reason 😂
Just call Kevin Feige solve problems of the mcu movies morbius?? 😑😑😤😤
I think that Rob hit the nail on the head.
How was it never in there when it’s in the preview so prominent? I think Rob is right, it was cut out because the movie is trash…
I think they took out those parts because how Spider-Man ended, Spider-Man will be in the film, maybe either a cameo or post credit scene….
What if this is just an elaborate April Fools Day prank?
Spider-Man fans: Morbius connects to Spider-Man!
Sony: April fools . . .
How long will it be before Sony sells the movie rights to Spiderman back to Disney?
Also, how long will it be before the parent company of Sony Pictuers sells its movie and tv shows departments off to other companies? Maybe Rakuten, or Netfilx? I know that they'll still hold on to its Aniplex/Crunchyroll divisions of course, but not the tv and movie departments.
I think they have to release a Spider-Man movie every five years or they'll lose all their Spidey film rights to Marvel. Guess that explains 2012 Amazing Spider-Man reboot so soon after 2007 Spider-Man 3. Spider-Man is their life savior and money maker. This movie seems to be heading the route the Fant4stic movie went under 20th Century Fox.
@@reannagordon That explains everything! Those 2 Spidy movies felt rushed, and its weird how fast the first MCU Spidy movie came out after the second Amazing Spidy film.
At least Sony can keep its Aniplex/Crunchyroll/animation departments, and crank out Spiderman animations that aren't MCU related, or even anime co productions with Disney and another Japanese studio. There's no way Sony can keep its movie and non anime tv show departments intact in this streaming war future.
@@Dave102693yeah Sony has been trying to do this whole “sinister six” movie for a while now. That’s part of the reason why TASM 2 was bad. They used that movie to launch various villains with the teaser at the end when Harry was in jail or something. I also remember there wasn’t a lot of action or Spider-Man moments and too much will they or won’t they scenes with Gwen and Peter. Plus you had the weird mystery with his parents, the worst Norman Osborn interpretation (to me), Harry popping out of nowhere, they didn’t even feel like bffs. There was just soooo many side stories and no offense to Jamie but I wasn’t a fan of Electro. He hates Spider-Man because he didn’t recognize him? Lmao I couldn’t recognize him either with that horrible look.
@@Dave102693 So basically after the 2014 train wreck they needed to decide how they were going to do better at the box office and legally keep their Spidey film rights from going back to its creator and well Disney since they acquired Marvel back when the MCU was just starting. Then we got the Marvel Sony deal which allowed Marvel to use Spider-Man in the MCU in exchange for co-producing Sony’s Spiderverse movies or whatever and hey, they’ve had billion dollar box office success with Marvel because of Spidey’s affiliation with the Avengers and other characters in the MCU.
@@reannagordon With each, and every detail to this story, makes me realize that Sony has no idea on how to make a movie anymore, and should just sell off its non electronics divisions off, or merge them with their Music and anime divisions, and sell the rest.
& you were like oh spider man is in it 😂😂😂
If I had a nickel for every time Jared Leto was in a over hyped Comic Book Movie that was hacked to bits in post production causing him to became the butt of the joke in fan spaces I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but its weird it happened twice.
Haha! This made me laugh out loud. Jesus Christ.
Morbius will help The Batman cross the 1 bn mark.
Oh no, the most anticipated comic book movie of 2004 is having issues?
Lmfao!
I've never really had faith in the Morbius film since it was rumoured. Like I love the Spidey comics, love Morbius as a character. But like why would you ever give him his own film. He is a C list spiderman villain. And to give him a solo film feels super pointless. As a follow up from Venom its was a weak character to go with. Should went with another member of the Sinister Six if they were trying to establish something. And the whole multiversity is very confusing for me?
I’m less mad about the lack of Spider-Man audiences and more about how they lied in the trailers
I think its happened because Sony had no idea what universe the Sony films were in until No Way Home. I don't think it was a lie, just Sony having no plan and no idea what they were doing until it was too late.
Morbius was originally going to come out before No Way Home and I think they wanted to trick audiences into thinking it was part of the MCU, look its the vulture! Look spider-man is a murderer like in far from home (but they got the wrong suit). Then NWH came out first and was a success, and it established the venomverse is a separate universe and it made fans want the other Spideys back. Sony quickly had to change the plan for Morbius and make it seem less like its in the MCU, they couldn't cut Vulture completely because they put him in the trailers so instead they just moved him to the post credits. Potentially the plan was to make it seem like the sonyverse was MCU and cross Tom Holland over, but now the multiverse is open they have other options and wanted to change Morbius to allow something else in the future.
Garfield also told us in NWH that he became bitter after Gwen's death and stopped pulling his punches. We also got hints to Black Cat & Rhino, both who were introduced in TASM2. And the Oscorp sign looked alot like TASM universe. I thought it was going to be in his universe.
I also think they had to overhaul it bc of No Way Home. Bit off more than they could chew but it might just be a side effect of having to push this movie back to after NWH (bc of the pandemic)
That's wishful thinking
Here's my theory....Morbius was supposed to come out a year (or more) ago.
But since it was pushed back to AFTER "No Way Home" the Spider man "Murderer" stuff wouldn't make sense b/c the DR Strange spell "fixed" everything.
Michael Keaton's Vulture wouldn't remember Spiderman now.
The fact that it comes out after NWH screwed up the whole script.
yo this is actually a very good point
@@brianc620 BUT...maybe the scenes that were shot had Vulture talking about Peter Parker and now they can't use it.
I am just reaching for straws with this theory....I wouldn't be surprised it SONY just screwed this up due to incompetence.
This makes a lot of sense actually…
@@redfieldmovieuniverse4002 not really
@@BigDoener they only care about holding onto the ip
I'm gonna go with Rob here and say something smells fishy here, Feige saw Morbius and probably didn't want anything to do with it.
If this is true, I guess it makes more sense now that the movie is being released on April Fool's Day lol
I don't understand why John had faith in this film. The trailers looked awful. The director has never made a good movie, and the writers are responsible for such classics as Gods of Egypt and The Last Witch Hunter. This movie was going to suck from the moment it was announced.
he never made a good movie?? i actually liked safe house with ryan reynolds lol
@@detroitalwayz3132 Safe House was ok. His movies have mixed reviews at best - many have negative.
I don't have a lot of confidence in a movie that gets released on April Fool's Day
Every time I see the trailer or TV spot for this movie, they always say "The next Marvel Legend is coming." That already sounds weird to me. The fact that they constantly have to emphasize that this is a Marvel character felt like they were trying too hard to sell the movie.
100%! I’ve always thought that Sony kept pushing this movie WAY too much on us and it just screamed “mediocrity” and still does. I’ll still see the movie myself but my expectations can’t be any lower…
I’ve never heard of this character until I saw the trailer months ago 😭
Maybe it’s time for Sony to hire a Kevin Feige type to oversee the Sony Marvel universe. Amy Pascal should not be that person.
Once again, I gotta agree with Rob. This movie was done and supposed to be released two years ago, before all the connections to spider verse it was only Tom Holland spiderman. No one involved with this knew about details from NWH. its all editing, who's to say they hear these reports and put everything back in... They might be trying to hide story surprises?? But the marketing hasn't changed once since the original trailer. Yeah, not a good look when review embargo is so close to release, but they could be hiding something good instead of bad
Post-NWH pivot by Sony. This is what happens when the movie doesn't come out when it is supposed to. Movie never looked good to me but this makes me sad.
I actually hate Sony's production. We all know they are not up to the level of Marvel/Disney/Pixar
What? Sony is over hyping how closely related their film is to the MCU?... Say it ain't so.
What...that's never ever happened before🥴. Not Sony.
It seems pretty obvious that due to the past 2 years with lockdowns and films being shuffled and rescheduled Marvel had to change a lot with their original plans with the multiverse story arc. And I think the original plans were to work with Sony in helping them create their new Spiderverse by allowing them to mention the multiverse and have certain connection points. Venom had a minor end credits teaser connection, but Morbius was going to be the first of the Sony movies to really showcase the new spiderverse. But that film was made and finished before Covid flipped everything forcing Marvel to swap movies around and tell the multiverse story in a different way. Now the multiverse storyline in Morbius is no longer fitting in the puzzle and they don't have the time and can't afford to refilm large chunks of the film to make it fit to the new Marvel storyline. So they have decided to just cut them out. So I don't think the original trailers were lying to us, those scenes were originally in the finale edit, but have now had to be cut out so they can tell the multiverse connection another way in another film that will make sense and connect with what Marvel have already told. Problem is, Sony would have had to have known about this months ago and would have re edited the film long before now. So all the new trailers that have popped up in the last couple of months that still sell this movie on it's connections to Spider-Man, that still shows those Keaton scenes, should be classed as a total lie and an illegal selling technique.
The original Venom had pretty misleading marketing too. The Venom trailers did not pitch a Buddy cop movie starring Eddie Brock and Venom, but that’s the movie we got. It’s not as egregious as what’s being reported here, but that’s something to keep in mind in regards to Sony superhero marketing
Trailers looked like some early 2000s super hero movie like daredevil
Just like the 2 Venom movies lol
@@betterlatethannever2156 exactly. Sony-Verse is just like a more dated version of the MCU
@Jose.A. No need to get emotional over some films my dude
Sony need to wake up and stop making these 2002-2005 superhero movies in 2022
Well said
They are making a lot of money with it...
@@guilhermebahia6050 who gives a shit those movies r still incredibly amateur but obviously Sony won’t care cuz how ironic that they’re like symbiote sucking onto marvel to succeed
Going to be biggest April fools joke by Sony
Tgese are the same moron who wanted to make aunt may movie. I don't know etf are they thinking
Rob is right. John is delusional. If the scenes and storyline connecting to the greater multi-verse being removed are true…it’s a 99% chance that they removed them to avoid having a turd connected their cinematic universe of toy commercials. Gonna skip this one, trailers looked like shallow fluff to me.
Honestly this looks like an early 2000 origin movie with the same old formula people are tierd of, guy gets powers half way in the movie so the first half is boring then he learns how to use them towards the middle, fights only humans (boring henchmen with no powers just people with guns) then the final villain which idk who it is, maybe another guy with a gun and the end 😑
Based on the formula of the Venom movies (and a lot of the MCU movies to be honest), I bet the villain will be another vampire.
@@MiloMurphysLaw that’s the Arrowverse formula
This is so freaking accurate! 😂
This stuff is why Sony should not have complete control over Spiderman. No Way Home mostly happened because of Kevin Feige.
🙂 So did you see The Morbius move yet?
😃 Well I met this guy who knew this guy who knew this guy who knew this guy who knew this guy who knew this guy's cousin who saw the movie and said Spider-Man wasn't in it.
Classic Sony, they have a good run with a movie: into the Spider-verse, No way home, then they release a turd: BOTH VENOM movies and now this crap
That's because without mcu they are nothing. And they will never make more money unless they connect it to mcu. Nobody cares about no name villains
I thought both venom films were awesome!
Jared Leto had bad luck with Comic movies smfh. First Suicide Squad and the DCEU/Warner politics and now this.
maybe its a April fools joke
Wait haven’t you heard, morbius is the new marvel legend! I’ve only heard that about 8,657 times in the past month so it must be true right
Saw it in London last night. It's true. All of Keaton is cut save for some very bad end credit scenes.
Jared Harris also gets chopped considerably based on what I have seen in the trailers. He's virtually a non-entity in the movie.
It's all baaaaaad. Very bad.
And…Sony have the audacity to hired the same Morbius writers to write Madam Web…good god when can this misery ends lol
If you're gonna go see a morbius film then shouldn't that be on the strength of the movie and not whether so other bull from other movies is shoehorned in.