TOP 5 Guns The Government Doesn't Want You To Have
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июл 2024
- It doesn’t matter to anti-gunners what cartridge the gun is chambered in, what particular ammo it’s loaded with, or whether it has fiber optic, red dot sights or anything that would help with aiming. In a nutshell, guns that look mean or scary are much more deadly than any other firearm. No gun store should be allowed to sell such guns, and no civilian should be allowed to purchase such guns.
Heck, you can build yourself an AR-15 chambered in some measly rimfire cartridge like the .22 Long Rifle, and if the Biden administration signs the recently proposed 2021 Assault Weapons Bill into law, all semi-automatic AR-15 rifles chambered in .22 Long Rifle will be banned. If that sounds absurd to you, it’s because it is. But it gets even more absurd, as the government wants to ban some guns that you don’t even want in the first place.
Please LIKE and SUBSCRIBE help us reach 100k Subscribes
➥ RUclips: bit.ly/PewpewZone
➥ Website: pewpewzone.com/
➥ Facebook: www. madmanreview.offic...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#2ndamendment #guncontrol #gunlaw
they dont want you to have any guns at all.
Facts!
Unless you are brainwashed into gunning for them.
this looks bad untill you look at us canadians
I have 5 of each
NWO.
I picked up a brand new Thompson clambered in .45 ACP 3 years ago that came with a 75 round drum and 2 30 rouns stick magazines from a sporting goods store for $1200. I couldn't believe the price on the tag was real! Needless to say I wasn't about to leave the store without it!
Really stinks how you lost it in that fishing accident huh?
That’s dope
I met this dude on telegram he sells all kinds of guns I copped my first ever Glock 17 off him
it could be anywhere@@PorngeSky
I have a 22 calico it sucks bought it for 200$
big brother wants to take away my toys!
Listening to this commentary in the beginning, brought back an actual incident that I experienced. While serving on the NYPD and at the police range in the Bronx NY., I had the opportunity to speak to another patrolman assigned to Emergency Services, I was familiar with several types of firearms as I was a Hunter. He showed me a Thompson Sub-Machine gun, which frankly impressed me. Then he explained its actually more fore show than actual effectiveness. An Ithaca 12ga pump action shotgun loaded with Double O Buck shot (5- 32 cal, balls with each shot) is far more devastating and deadly.
Sorry but the Thompson in the hands of someone that truly knows how to use it, is a devastating firearm, that's why it was used in WW2, more than any pump shotgun, and during prohibition, machine gun Kelly was renown for sweeping the streets clean. Shotguns are great for close combat, but when you need something that does close range work, then switch to longer range work, pick the 45 acp every time
@robertrickett7816 he wasn't saying it wasn't. Sure tomsons put 30 45 acp rounds down range but a oo shotgun shell puts 8 to 12 33 millimeter barings in a fist size area 12 times. Their used to hunt deer. Decent at long range easyer to aim fire and keep on target. In anyone's hands it's a beast. Where as the Thomson on semifire is basically a 1911 with more rounds but alot more weight. The germens thought that pumpaction shotguns should be banned in wwi for a reason. Probably the best home defense weapon.
the Thompson was literally designed for trench warfare, stand in a trench and spray, just like the grease gun, no aiming necessary, it's a crowd control weapon, if you want the crowd to die
Knowing the government doesn't want me to have them makes me want to have them.
What you’re describing is a lack of human development, perhaps even personality disorder. You’re the last person that should own a gun.
I call that the forbidden fruit Factor
Exactly
You, me, and countless millions of others dude....
right!?
I have a modern Calico and it functions flawlessly through all 100 rounds. The gun gets a bad rap but I think a ton of it is due to people not understanding how the magazine tension works. There's a little crank on the back and you put it about 10 cranks for the 50 round and 23 cranks for the 100 round, which keeps the tension up as bullets are fired and the magazine empties. Proper tension is what ensures it doesn't fail to feed as you get low on ammo.
check if it runs different ammo, if it feeds well only on some companies ammo, then it deserves criticism it gets (also its just ugly as hell)
@@januleosz9999well then it's a win-win if ugly people got shot with it lol
not an ugly gun AT ALL. I used to own the 50 shot 9mil it was awesome looking. Unfortunately IT had to disappear...@@januleosz9999
The issue is that the loooooooong helical spring in the magazine wears out. New, they work fine. But as they're used, they become increasingly more unreliable. Sometimes, people will over-crank them to compensate, which furthers the issue.
@@thematt6705 I've had a Calico M-110 in .22lr for around 30 years now, never had an issue with the helical spring wearing out. In fact mine has been nothing but a joy to use. I'd be leaning towards the use of bad ammo, especially for .22, the problems have lessened ever since I stopped using Remington thunderbolts. Remington ammo even fowled up my Ruger 10/22.
Basically, every single ban is a case of government's overreaction and lack of elemental knowledge.
@krauses4189Its going to cost more than a car to even own and is already probably class 4 or 5 license weapon. So you already need to be pretty wealthy to even consider buying one. “Anti-tank” rifles didnt penetrate sloped armor even from tanks in WW2, thats why 50 cals and other high caliber rifles are classified as “Anti-material” rifles.
@krauses4189 If you think you can disable a modern tank using only an anti material rifles you are out there to begin with. You don’t have to be 6 figures to own a 50 caliber rifle regardless, though the ammo itself is absurdly expensive so you might have to be to use it somewhat regularly. If you think theres some big issue with dudes who live in the middle of nowhere shooting bullets at 20 dollars a shot on their own property, then I think you have a lack of realistic concerns.
@krauses4189 Massive damage to society?? God you must live in a very sheltered world if you think the bullet being larger in a gun makes it a threat to society. As if somebody is going to commit a mass shooting with their 20 thousand dollar 20 pound marksman rifle.
Or spent thousands to for paperwork to legally own an automatic M2, while living in one of the like 4-5 american states you can own one. All this and it would cost you about 3000 usd to fire a burst for less than a minute, this is like 5 dollars a bullet.
Any urgency to prevent the probably less than 100 people own a fully operational, select fire (full auto) browning M2 50 cal seems like an absolute waste of time. We’ve trusted kids out of high school for almost 100 years to operate military equipment sometimes with MULTIPLE 50 cal weapon systems interconnected. But you don’t trust somebody who has taken all the proper precautions, spent a fortune just to privately own one?
Defund ATF. WE THE PEOPLE
Abolish
The main reason politicians propose absurd bans that do nothing to prevent crime or increase "public safety"is because they hope people will not care about what they are banning today, but they get to set unconstitutional but legal precedent to initiate bans in the first place that they intend to expand later.
And the riders that they can put on the Bill.
Ex-fucking-actly!!!!! Well said.
There isn't a single legal precedent in my mind or precedent that says that the government can do anything legally to ban anything that has to do with the Second Amendment anything the government does against the Second Amendment for the states do against the Second Amendment is all the illegal and I feel even if they think about doing something against the Second Amendment it's illegal
More babble!
We have to stop them from banning anything to do with our 2A. Give them an inch and they'll take 10 miles. They do want to take away our right to protect ourselves from Them.
I think Sen. Kennedy (R-La) said it best “If the government says you shouldn’t have guns . . . buy two”!
This the best comment ever 🤣
Everyone WANTS to have a Barrett M82 but many can't afford it.
Definitely on my bucket list, but the m107a1
Exactlyyyy
I almost purchased one when I was young but didn't because I had absolutely no idea where to shoot it. The gun store owner said no range anywhere in the area would allow me to shoot a .50 BMG because it would destroy their ranges. I'm older and still foolish but I still don't know of any places that would allow it to be shot there so it's pointless to buy.
@@silverdoggg depends on where you live, I have a 1,000 yrd range near me that could handle it.
And a side job just to feed it .😒
I had a good friend that owns a machine shop in Texas city named Ron Freshour. He was designing and building 50 caliber rifles for the military for years. He set some shooting records with them. I recovered the roofs and sides of all of his buildings there in Texas City. He would take homeless guys off the street and let them live there in the shop and teach them to become Machinist.
Не получаеться перевести, не могли вы на кирилице написать я точно отвечу, спасибо!
sounds like a damn good man.
If you have handled the M2 .50 BMG you know that it can be lugged around, it is not fun but it can be manhandled. Back in 2006, my platoon pissed me off by complaining about carrying the M2 a mile to our MotorPool so being an "Old School" NCO. I picked up the gun and threw it over my shoulder, without the Tripod, and humped it to the MP. I gave my block of instruction to the Sodliers and then told them I carried it here you all are taking it back. I allowed the TM-approved three-man carry method but, I never once got a complaint from them. Where there is a will there is a way. Also, there was s discovery channel show about Soldiers that were in OSUT during September 11th attacks at Fort Knox, where two privates are carrying the M2 to their assigned tank and a Staff Sergeant instructor grabbed it from them one-handed and lifted it up onto the tank to show them how to mount it. There are beasts out there that work with the M2 on a regular basis.
your my hero
@@quadriplegiccreationsyou're*
Yeah. Not a huge feat. That's only 84 lbs. 128 lbs with the M3 tripod. In 2013 I'd just leave them together when I'd set up and tear down my EIB site daily by myself for two weeks. I'd hump four of them 200m from the guarded weapons shack to my tent. Just did that same thing last week with a Mk-19 over my shoulder and the M205 tripod in my hand. Last May with two M2A1's training Hungarian and Serbian soldiers. Been doing it for over 18 years now that I think about it. Never really thought it was worth bragging about though.
@@mattmarzula Thank you for adding to the point of my comment. The M2 can be manhandled by personnel with experience.
@@mattmarzula ... EIB means different things to different people. To me, it means Excellence In Broadcasting.
It's about disarming civilians, not gun control.
If you're armed are you still a civilian?
This is it. They want total control. Getting the guns is the final step to that total control.
Soon they will usher in some new fake disaster that will convince almost everybody to give up their guns (and they few who don’t will be hunted down like animals by black ops) they will use some false flag or made up deception/disaster like some alien threat/attack that’s not even real or some other bullshit like some fake health thing or (or even release a real disease that they made themselves like a new Covid & then they could only give the good/real vaccine to who they want to live, & could let everyone else die or even give them a tainted vaccine.)
never know what it’ll be but they will do it eventually. they’ll make up some false flag and they’ll take control or at least attempt it. Just like how they got away with lying about the gulf of Tonkin/Vietnam, just like how they got away with lying about the Bay of Pigs, the Iran contra, jfk, 911, etc. they are masters of deception. I mean they own the media, they can basically control the common persons thoughts through the media.
Don’t be a common person/ NPC. Use discernment. Think for yourself!!! Do some independent research, listen & watch, & read from independent journalists and researchers that are not owned & bought by a certain interest like the main stream media journalists and hosts are.
Begin to realize the sketchy things that happen: like Obama’s signing in a law/executive order that made using propaganda/lies as actual US news/media & claiming its real/truth, so after Obama made that executive order/law, they can now make up any propaganda/fake news they want, & feed it to us as if it’s the truth, as if it’s actually the real news & truth but it’s not. Once you learn things like this, you will understand the truth of the matter & begin to question what they tell you- then you’ll begin to look for alternate sources that actually tell you the truth- like from other countries, from independent researchers, etc. you have to dig deep but the truth is out there- but you must use discernment.
@@flippy66yes because civilians don’t have access to the same resources as the military.
Gun control is to disarm you
If there's a book that's banned: That means there's something in it you need to read.
If there's a gun that's banned: That means it's one you definitely want to add to your collection.
What about the books banned in Florida and Utah?
@@mikeaguilar5764 banned from schools (age restricted) isnt the same as outright banned.
@@TrevFirestorm Those are what I'm talking about, obviously. Florida banned Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer because they "make white people look bad "
@@TrevFirestorm Not hitting on all the cylinders with that one. You're making the only police should have access to guns argument...
Sorry to burst your logic (though I do like where your going) there should absolutely be bans on dangerously poor designed guns.
Just like a Vehicle, if the thing had a spike pointed at your face, you'd probably make a law about that.. just like after that one celebrity lost an eye to their "Horn" ornament on the steering wheel.
Just saying, that and probably a book like some Hellraiser Puzzlebox Necronomicon should be Banned
If it wasn't called "The Street Sweeper" it probably would be legal everywhere
True. The name caused them to get noticed along with advertisements saying "It's a jungle out there, this is the cure", as well as "will make your street safe and clean!", "fires 12 rounds in less than 3 seconds" which are quotes from the original posters.
Lloyd Bentsen who was the Secretary of the Treasury deemed that it had no sporting purpose, and his reasoning was that there are no sports played in the street with a firearm. The only reason they allow importation or manufacture of firearms with a bore diameter larger than .50" is for "sporting Purposes" for civilians, or Mil/LE purposes.
Regardless, It's all BULL$HIT. These only allow 2 3/4" shells, so it's not as powerful as newer semi auto shotguns that accept drums or extended mag tubes that can hold 12 rounds or more. The USAS-12 is also another "Destructive Device" that only allows 2 3/4 shells, but the drums hold 20 rounds. There are still more powerful shotguns that can hold a higher capacity than the USAS as well.
If they were actually concerned about the gun because of the name u would expect them to surely add the improved and much better version on the ban list also... yet.. they haven't..
Lookup the Lady's Home Companion, this was just a Mid format that Politicos who saw that one Hollywood movie recognized and decided to get Good Boy points for Banning.
@pewpewreview5043 yeah mine holds 20+1 3" shells. If you hate your shoulder it can be emptied in about a second.
@@spidergoose891 Doesn't sound as powerful as a 9mm Glock, according to current mythos the Glock 9 can sever men in half and has a fifty round stick.
BooOOOooo
I remember the street sweeper. They used to advertise it in old shotgun news.
Always wanted the street sweeper.
My dad had one a long time ago. The government ended up stealing it.
I got a look at a Street Sweeper---pre-Clinton. It was a roughly finished crude looking POS, with welds that weren't even ground flat. It brought to mind the late WW2 "Volk Sturm" issued to civilians. ------I liked the USAS-12, which was a 12 ga., that looked like a giant AR. I'm too short to properly even shoulder the thing. Clinton & Benson also outlawed that one too. (Benson: "You don't NEED that to hunt ducks." He, like Clinton, Feinstein, Schumer and all the other gun Nazis, was an arrogant self-righteous piss-head).
I saw a photo of a drawing of the prototype in a SOF magazine from the mid 80's. It was codenamed MM1 Multiround Projectile Launcher but it held 20 rounds then and it used any 12 guage round. Buckshot, slugs, tear gas, flasbang and HE.
How did they do that?
@@nedlyest
Believe it or not in New jersey air guns are treated the same as regular firearms. So you need the same permit for an airrilde as a Barret 50.
Disgusting
That's insane!
Drive to Utah (because that's practical😂) and buy one over the counter from Utah Airguns
The 90s ban didnt stop us from obtaining any of these guns or mags..It just made us pay outrageous prices for them😭🤣
AKs for a thousand bucks,Steyrr black Augs for 5 grand,HK 91s for 2500 etc.
The best era to have brought all of these guns was the 1980s..Now most of these guns are sitting in collectors vaults and you rarely see anybody selling one here and there.
"The 90s ban didnt stop us from obtaining any of these guns or mags..It just made us pay outrageous prices for them" yeah, this way the rich can still have THEIR guns but the poor are priced out of the market.
That's sounds like it really sucks man
True.. . Real macs 10's and uzi's
Its almost like the gates of hell were opened in the 70's.
Hell, they need to worry more about those of us that the military trained, with the knowledge we have in our minds....that's more deadly than any weapon they want to ban.
If the SHTF, and a military-trained friend needed a rifle, I would be inclined to lend him mine.
lawl. You were *actually* a member of a well-regulated militia. The other randoms? Might be better if they didn't have military hardware.
Now I know what firearms to go buy now. Thank you for the list of what I need
Not really, a lot of them have issues thats why they didn't get the government contracts. Also they have RULES in warfare, if I wound 1, 2 have to drag you off, 5 to keep you going , transportation back,that can't bring supplies to the lines.
Lol right
"Rules for thee and not for me, layman." "Cheer's to that, gov. Remember, since we don't get to burn the ammo the way the crown does; Our shots have to count." -my extremely drunk friend conversing about this exact topic, maybe.
Politics be like, "That gun we saw in a video game?.... Ban it, that gun we saw in the movies?... Ban it, that expensive gun which no one can afford? Ban it."
Name five they are OK with you having,...........................
🤔(1) daisy: red rider .
(2) whamo slingshot
(3) ,,,,,
All I have.
@@TalmageL-pn2pv There are places they will not let you have them.
So-called anti-gunner here. Here's 5 general categories of guns I think should be legal:
1. Pump action shotguns
2. Revolvers
3. Semi-automatic handguns
4. Bolt-action rifles
5. Any other type of gun that couldn't be used, and whose main purpose appears to be, producing large numbers of casualties in very short periods of time.
How's that?
@@nadamucho466
2nd amendment:states "shall not be infringed upon.."
American citizens should be able to have anything they can afford to buy. .
Period, and those who can't shoot or are afraid of everything, let THEM DO WITHOUT, their choice..
The Barrett M82 is one of my favorite rifles but it kicks like a mule so a lot of people prefer smaller calibers the striker shot gun was one of my favorites but they have a lot better now Tommy guns are fun to shoot but aren't known for their problems there's only one reason for the government to want you not to have certain guns and guns in general and it has nothing to do with peoples safety
My take on the Thompson M-1929: The stock is too long to shoulder rapidly, the drum mag is difficult to load and jams easily. The M-1 is a good improvement. Gotta love "The Chicago Typewriter".
Drum mags look cool, but they mostly suck, with few exceptions.
*LET'S BE CLEAR ON WHY THEY WANT TO DISARM US: “Our main agenda is to have all guns banned of course. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn’t matter if you have to distort facts or even lie. Our task of creating a Socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.”*
- Sarah Brady
The Barrett 50BMG is a rifle I’ve wanted since 2008 or so. I had saved up the money to buy it and before I could get it, my life turned upside down. I was hurt and medically retired. My disability pay didn’t start right away like it was supposed too, so I spent my savings and sold 95% of my firearms collection. I doubt I’ll ever get that close again. Heck, I’d be happy just getting some of the pieces in my collection back. I shoot for sport and for hunting. I really want to shoot a mile with a gun of my own. I used to love shooting 3 shots in almost the exact same spot on a target. I miss competing and being around other shooting enthusiasts.
Lame...
@@mattmarzulacringe
@Hewhoremains420 thank you. Yeah, the injury isn’t a very good story unfortunately. I was lifting a part in place, I was under the engine nacelle so I was sort of bent at a weird angle. As I was lifting it I had to twist a bit, with the Wright of the part at eye level. It wasn’t very heavy maybe 40-50 pounds but being bent at a weird angle and the twist, I heard and felt a loud pop. It dropped me to the ground. I made it home and ended up face down on the floor for the night. My wife took me to a clinic the next day and they said it was just chronic pain. They didn’t do anything as far as X-rays or even any sort of real evaluation. I took that to my military doctor and he sent me straight to PT. Everything they had me do hurt in a very different way compared to what you expect. I told them and the guy said,”it’s suppose to”. After a couple visits I quit making the appointments because it hurt to much. Because it was misdiagnosed, it would start to heal and fuse back together, and it would get refractured. It took my commander sending a rather nasty email to my doctor to get them to take it seriously. They x-rayed it and I got a voicemail that said”oh, it turns out there was something wrong with your back”.. the sent me to a neurosurgeon, he did an MRI and then scheduled my surgery for that same week. He told me I had refractured the same location so many times that the bone was no longer healing and part was actually missing. When I was recovering from the surgery, he told my wife that he had no clue how I was even able to walk in that day for the surgery. The vertebrae was actually floating around the spinal cord not connected to the upper or lower spine at all. He said he could spin it freely. After that, the recovery didn’t go so well. My military doctor actually didn’t sign my medical leave paperwork for the time off needed. I got a call from my shop that said I was awol… I was drugged up, could barely walk and still had all the staples in and they made me sit at a desk. I was told to stay laying down and do short walks, like out to the mailbox and back, but don’t sit upright with you upper body pushing down on the location. I did everything I could to get better but to no avail. Ultimately I did more harm than good trying to push through it. My military doctor who was still pissy about my commander telling him off, put me in for a med board as soon as he could. I was set to be medically retired exactly on my ten year anniversary of enlisting. On my way out one of my coworkers came up to me and started asking about it all. It turned out he had something very similar happen and he was doing his best to grit through it. He ended up with the same sort of surgeries and med retirement. He took his life a few years after. It’s hard not to feel like you failed. And like a burden to your family. You feel like all that time you served was worthless, especially when you have to sell all your valuables trying just to get by until your disability benefits finally start paying you. One of the labels they put on your file isn’t very helpful with that worthless feelings is “unemployable” meaning if you had a job, you would be so unreliable day by day that they would have to let you go and find someone that could be there day to day or follow a set schedule… at least that’s how they explained it to me. If you do find a way to make money, you can’t exceed $11,000 or you could lose you benefits. You can get 100% disability but “employable” which is useful when your waiting on the system to start paying you. Either way… these days we are just trying to get by, with a 2 year old that took us 18 years to finally have. A 43yr old beat down, first time dad to a little boy… I think of all the stuff I want to teach him and just piss myself off. I am going to try and find a couple of the 22’s they used to teach sharp shooters in WWII. Even if I have to do some work cleaning them up. They are extremely accurate and fun to shoot. I had an Anshutz and loved that thing, but I know I’m not going to find one I can afford. If I can’t find those, I’ll just go with a couple 10/22’s, I just like the Historical aspect of the others and the feel of metal and wood, no plastics. I also really liked being able to change up the sights as easily as those where with changeable disks for the front and rear that just snap in place. I like AR’s for the ease of making purpose built rifles. I’ve not done 80% ones though. I’ve built several AR’s starting from blank uppers and lowers. That’s one of the biggest reasons people love them so much, You can build it to your specifications with endless parts. I had to sell my 3D archery setup and I traded it for an upper that is a crossbow… you use your own built lower with it popping in like a regular upper receiver. I could put 3 bolts all touching into a target at 80 yards. I have it and 2 other uppers for the one lower. That was 10 years ago though. I haven’t been to a gun show since and never in Jacksonville NC, where we live now…. I don’t want to tease myself and get angry at all the stuff I can’t afford, lol.
@@JK-zq9vwthank you for your service. You may not have the collection you had but you only need two for a good hunting trip with your boy
@@drpoopy3772 thank you. that’s true, I just hope enjoys shooting and firearms technology so I have a shooting buddy one day.
King George did not want us to have them either.
Gun control was never about keeping you safe.
Neither is the war on drugs or the prison system
Yes your right Look to Europe/Germany they make it 90% Impossible to get a gun license
It's the opposite, and it is the same for every country.
For exemple the French lost most of their right to have weapon in 1939, just before most of their governement fled to England and the rest allied themself to the enemy.
If the government wants to ban a particular gun that's exactly the gun I want regardless of whether it's a dud or not
I have found the Ruger Mini-14 with 76 round drum, using the Hellfire trigger and an illuminated 4-16x scope is the best combat rifle I have owned. By the way. I have not had a problem with the Calico Pistol!
M82 was sold at sportsman's warehouse and I bought one when I was 23. It was a fun gun. Sold it. Had a calico for about a year and it was fun.
The street sweeper still has one up on mag fed shotguns. With a light trigger pull you can index the cylinder without firing. So you could load less lethal for 3 rnds. Load bird shot for 3. Then load OO buck and slugs for last 6. And if you could keep count you could skip around as to what you were firing i had one way back when. Hurt to shoot it though
You want absurd? what does "high powered rifle" even mean? Is an AR in .22, .223, or .308 each a high powered rifle because the rifle makes the bullet powerful? Is there a such thing as a medium powered rifle? If yes then wouldn't a .223 be a medium powered rifle? and if no, then are you just marketing a scary phrase.
It's like they watched a bunch of Hollywood movies and said,"What the fuck is that? Put it on the list!"
At least it was with enthusiasm and not "What was that Hollywood Scary Gun, Ban it"
The last time the government banned firearms-related equipment was in 2018. Let's see...who was the president in 2018. Anyone?
We already know quite a few people consider "shall not be infringed" to be a sliding rule depending on who is in office and whether the object in question is something said people want/don't want.
It was Trump & they stupidly banned bump stocks, which Steven Paddock didn't even use in the Las Vegas shooting incident.
Use to be a law you had to own a firearm
They would even Ban muzzle loader or musketeers
I want a calico. I get it the firearm kinda sucks but it has such a iconic look. Would be a great range toy
They still make them. You are right, it is great fun. Ammo is prohibative, lol.
Ban the 50 caliber it has never used in a crime. Maybe once or twice. Finestine carries a gun.
They be all gangster and thinking they're invincible until someone comes in with the 2nd Amendment
I understand and agree with you 100%. However, you don’t need a tank to mount a .50. Taliban and CAG have been mounting M2s and DSHKs to Toyota Hiluxs since the 80’s. All it takes is some welding and creativity and you’re golden, pony boy.
These guns are banned for the message they represent, whether it be civil anarchy or civil revolution, each of these guns have a pop culture meaning to society and thus could inspire a great portion of people to keep fighting back.
This the reason they're going so hard on the AR-15/M4 platform, it has become synonymous with the hero character in games and movies for decades now, and they don't want people getting big ideas.
Um... the absolute fix to people getting those "big ideas" is to stop treating firearms as a "taboo" subject that it essentially is today.
Growing up, the "guns" were in a cabinet that was not a SAFE ... it was a DECORATIVE piece of FURNITURE that held your guns... most having a GLASS door with wood frame around it and a so called lock on the door that usually could be turned by ANYTHING you stick in it and and turn.... The ammo was in a sliding drawer at the bottom of the cabinet. NOTHING about the piece of furniture that held the guns was designed to keep ANYONE out of it.
We had a TOYBOX FULL of GUNS and the neighbors brought THEIR pile of GUNS and we shot each other 500 times a DAY... and when someone started to "cheat" and never DIE.... pine cones filled in for GRENADES and they couldn't even TRY to deny they been HIT....
If you haven't gotten your first KILL by 10-13 y ears old... you were wierd one....
Any one of us could have taken any one of the guns out of the display case and loaded it and fired it... and most were descent shots... because we were taught how to USE them, SHOOT them... RESPECT them. Each of us absolutely knew 100% the results of pulling the trigger.
And you know what? Taking a gun out and bringing it to school and open fire.... I can't even say it was the LAST thing on our minds .... because.... THAT idea never even ENTERED our minds.
But we DID have a problem with people bringing guns to school in high school though... and every year the principal came on the intercom to remind everyone it is against the rules/policy to bring guns to school... so please remember to remove your guns from the gun racks in your truck windows becore you leave for school! Every year when hunting season kicked off... a bunch would forget and drive to school wiht their rifles hanging in their windows.... lol.,
Most kids now...their "education" does not come from being taught how to use/respect them as part of GROWING UP.... their "education" mainly comnes from X-Box or whatever and the shooter games they play.... while the REAL guns have become a "taboo" thing... locked and hidden away if there IS one... and kids getting YELLED at if they even show ANY interest in the gun parents are "hiding' away from them.
When they DO manage to get ahold of a real one... they are absolutely CLUELESS their "experience" with guns came from shooting their buddies online... but hey... we shot each other 500 times a day too.... but each of us were TAUGHT to use/respect the REAL ones...
In order to be a society with the right to BEAR ARMS... it is ESSENTIAL that the "rite of passage" growing up is to be taught how to BEAR THEM and how to USE THEM/RESPECT them.
WIthout the passing down of the "skills" to handle and USE them to the kids... then you get a generation that has neither the SKILL to use them or the RESPECT they demand in order TO US# them.
They get the "big idea" because the parents never gave them the "RIGHT idea" in place of the "Big idea".....
There was also a version of the streetsweeper called the ladys home companion that was chambered in 45-70
Also in 45LC, which also allowed the use of .410 shotgun shells.
They should make one chambered in 45-120.
HAHAHAHA, least we forget the Calico's appearance in... SPACEBALLS
So they don't want us to have those guns but nobody wants them anyway??? So......???? That like telling diabetics that you are banning chocolate. This is dumb.
Those are “things” that require great responsibility…
Which is why politicians shouldn't be allowed to own guns or have constitutional rights.
Hilton Walker was Rhodesian(there's a big difference). The Striker was desgned there, but was produced in South Africa-it is an Armsel product.
Used primarily by para-military and mercenary groups
Good thing you didn't mention the Ohio Ordnance HCAR. That is one semi auto rifle we should all own if you can afford it 👍
🤫
TF , i thought some things are sacred lmao , lets ban our own stuff, like florescent, we invented - and like yeah ban our own F***KIN round , 30-06 REAL AMERICAN.....? , all the people that see guns as scary need to be in an actual situation 10.10 times (if they somehow still survive) are NOOOO longer anti gun lmfao, i mean why NOT be safe...?
@willyberg123 second, i would also like them to do a 25-06 shorter barrel *trail shoulder rifle dream gun well one of em , light and long , 45-70/.450 marlin slaps too :D
Sup
Senator Feinstein has outlived her usefulness as a human being
I'd take a BAR over the Thompson any day. Just saying
#5 I do know a guy that bought an M-82 Barrett in 1989 before the US Military cabbaged on to it. It was running at about $1500.00 then. He was using some $$ that the US Army was giving him and his military history/security clearance/plus a letter from his County Sheriff/SWAT to "smooth the approval" as he was ordering from an APO that is in S. Korea, for delivery in the US. He once told me when he was ordering it, that he wanted to be able to say that he had the biggest gun in the county. #4 NOBODY wants a Calico. ANY Calico. Neat idea but plenty of issues. Although I might in the future purchase one for the parts if I can get it cheap enough. #3 There is a reason that the Street Sweeper was invented in Zimbabwe, and it has plenty of history on that continent, but again, there are much better drum shotguns and even full auto 12ga like the Daewoo USAS-12, which can use either mag or drum. #2 Thompson sub machine guns are a favorite weapon of nearly every soldier that carries one (kind of like the M-1911). It is however hated by the governments that pay for it and the .45 ACP ammo that it uses. Soldiers usually prefer the stick mags though, except in certain circumstances. The US Army used the tommy gun as late as the Vietnam War, and Warren Zevon wrote a song mentioning it being used by mercenaries in the Congo and Biafra wars in Africa (Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner). #1 I have known someone that had an M-2 Heavy Barrel (High School Teacher, I was jealous) and he told me that he only usually fires it once or twice a year. With rounds going for $2.00 each at the time plus he had to buy every link that he could get his hands on and build his own belts, I could understand why. Plus have you ever carried one?! I have! Gun, Two barrels, tripod/tool kit? Wikipedia says 128 lbs, but that is just with one barrel (trust me, take the spare! and don't forget the Asbestos glove and Go/No Go tool!) so in reality closer to 150lbs, and that is without any ammo. I mean, there is a reason that it is vehicle or emplacement mounted, and why there is an assistant gunner usually. There is a reason that it has been in use all over the world since 1933 to the present. GOD I LOVE THAT GUN!!!
The Calico is actually a fine weapon. 9mm. Carbine. I owned one back in the 80's. They are still in business.
@@broncobra I don't actually consider the Calico bad, but the .22 did get a reputation early on for being a bit fiddley and finicky, mostly to do with the helical mag and feed. That reputation has carried on thus why the nobody wants a Calico comment.
9239costner
I met this dude on telegram he sells all kinds of guns I copped my first ever Glock 17 off him
Box cutters don't devastate through few millimeters of solid steel from half a mile afar perhaps? :D
And Now we have the AA 12
No civilian needs a military grade fire arm!!! Like what fucking war are YOU fighting? 😂
Wait and find out
This is America, and out government wants to take the right to protect, and yet those who make these laws are surrounded by the weapons that are just as deadly.
You can't have a totalitarian government if the people are armed.
not just in america
I know I just found your channel, but I am curious about a few revolvers that are amazing collectors pieces. Mainly the Mateba Unica Autor-evolver chambered in .454 cassul, along with the Smith an Wesson .500 Magnum Performance Hunter edition (aka bone collector).
Friend of mine bought a 42 mm German machine gun replica. Then he bought a 44 magnum Ruger Rifle. We took off the wood stock and threw it in the trash. 😮 Yup, then put the guts of the 44 magnum into the replica. Hooked up like it was meant for it. Took it to Williams Gun Range in Davison Michigan. We set it up, legs down on the gun table. Then a Flint police officer came over and said.. I want to see the paperwork on that 🤔 We had everything in order. My buddy let him shoot it. Bulls eye every time. Was badass!! I miss my friend. He passed 5 years ago
The company wants to sell a lot more, military contracts are usually a lot then nothing for the next 10. Civilian buying is a lot more steady and to keep a company in business. So slip somebody $1,000 or so and asked for the administration to outlaw them. Then everybody wants to buy one before they are gone.
From what you said they gave terrorist some lol for a war lol 😂. They are so full of it
The ignorance of anti-gunners, where firearms realities are concerned, is truly amazing.
The beauty of America is the 2A, and honestly an armed american, is by definition, a Patriot. What i mean by that statement, is that exercising your rights, as an American, is patriotic AF. Period. What you use it for or plan to use if for is another matter altogether, but the fact that you all are well armed is what keeps invaders away, and keeps would be tyrannical powers at bay. Cheers from Canada.
Nothing wrong with the new Calico magazines. All of the “feeding issues“ are because people don’t load them or wind them properly. You have to read and understand the instructions to know how to use them for them to work right. Mine worked flawlessly and the MSRP is cheaper than most new pistols.
Sen. Fiebstien, weekend at Bernies
Tales from the Crypt. She has a second job as the puppet in the show.
They are just looking for a staring point ,then they will work on the rest.
im canadian and we have only shotguns (5 round limit) and hunting rifles (3 round limit) now pistols are fully banned other than priviously owned handguns but to see the us loose this is sad couse if i want to shoot stuff like this ill go to texas and do it now if this goes through where whould i go
I kinda feel like making my own guns now
400 year old Tech, why not, make a knife too they've both been used in War for about the same amount of time now
@@johndee2990 ok let's talk a lot and say nothing why don't we?
@@bryonholsten5798 I'm saying they shouldn't take away the old toys, what's the point even when anyone can make a "Pointy Stick" in other words, Men know how to fish now.
Phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range
If they ban the 400 year old "toys" then Unironically *Soon*
Well they can kiss what I can't and I don't mean my elbow.
That Bob Mitchell is my kinda guy😂
Ammo for the 50 cal is not perfectly cheap, as it averages around $5 per round.
9$
$3 where i am at, Tracer and FMJ
@@stefanmolnapor910 I have commented an update to my original post, and my comment keeps getting deleted.
@@troy3456789 damn YT!!!
@@stefanmolnapor910 ahh, it finally allow that one. I was suspected the fascists in charge of this platform would delete that one too
U don’t really believe the box cutter thing do u? Not only were there no box cutters, but there was no planes at all. It’s all tv bro. U kno tel-lie-vision.
That gun they showed was the top 5 gun I wouldnt want. 😂
Again those who lack the knowledge in the given field making the rules bit like a doctor telling an engineer how to do his job just because he she has a degree
The Zimbabwean guy named Walker might have came up with the concept of the Defender/Striker but I actually did all the design draughting work including a hammer safety design so the weapon would pass the 6 foot drop test etc. We also did a 6 shot 40mm ballistite grenade launcher. I also used the exact same grip and trigger design on a 85mm HEAT SLRS (shoulder launch rocket system) that penetrated the T62 armour in the Angolan war. Note: Walker nearly blew his arm off in an explosive accident in Zimbabwe so actually only had the full use of one arm. At the time I was employed as a design draughtsman for a company that was sub-contracted to Armscor, Denel etc.
Were you alive when it was Rhodesia?
@@NateB Of course I was and I'm still kicking along albeit at a slower pace as I'm in my 70's now
I grew up in Texas , I'm used to firearms, half my family hunts, and/ or collect guns. What about the person who grew up with no hunting tradition, no firearms at home? What you call "anti gunners" are good people who are AFRAID. I used to mock them, now I don't. By the way, THEY are accustomed to many things, WE may not be. The noise, and density of large mega cities would drive me insane (as an example)
That's a refreshingly open minded and fair comment, and correct. I applaud you for making it.
There's a distinct difference between someone who doesn't want a firearm because they are apprehensive of it, and someone who doesn't want YOU to have a firearm because they are apprehensive of it. I can hope you figure out which is authoritarianism.
I love guns and anything that makes loud noises tbh but do you guys really need firepower like that? I’m in Australia and our gun laws are pretty strict and as annoying as it is as times we can have any sized gun we need to hunt and that’s all we really need at the end of the day. As a reward for not having easy access to hand guns and automatics we get to send our kids to school without the fear of them being shot 🤷♀️
@bentroeller2447 - NEED the fire power ? No. I'm my case, I'm a collector of knives and pistols / antique or modern. I do see your point to be honest. It's a tough, divisive issue sadly
@fu102 - I absolutely get that point.. but if hypothetically, majority of California says no to the AK-47 , in a referendum...but Texas says Yes...we shouldn't HATE either side. ( I'm sure the Supreme Court will crush Cali , but that's beside the point). States Rights are not a dictatorship. Of course a NATIONAL ban on any weapon...I WOULD OPPOSE
Forget the govt., your fellow citizens like me are also smart enough you don't need these.
I mean the rate of fire on the M2HB is so low to begin with (what like 450 RPM?), it's really not much of a disadvantage to have the semi-auto version. And they're probably "concerned" about it's effectiveness against light armored vehicles, especially if you have AP rounds (not sure if those are classified as destructive devices though). Someone else can chime in.
Armor piercing and armor piercing incendiary rounds in .50 BMG are not destructive devices, as classified by the BATFE. Any civilian can buy them without paperwork.
Calicos only came with 100 round magazines on the carbine models. The pistols came with 50 round magazines. I would love to have one of each model with a couple of mags for each.
You can buy either 50 or 100 rd mags. They are still made. They both work fine.
I encountered a pistol so rare that we had difficulty in researching it. It was a "Cabeza de Aguila (Eagle's Head) revolver, six chambers in the cylinder, black anodized aluminum frame, looking like a semi-auto, except with a bright chrome cylinder in it's middle. Ugliest gun I have ever seen. My partner and I told the seller that we were not interested in buying what we described as a 'boat anchor." He responded that his father had purchased it while in the Merchant Marine and that he would sell it to us in 2001 for $10.00. it was such an ugly gun that my partner and I agreed to pay $5.00 each (out of our own pockets!) just to put this pistol on display in our gun store as the "ugliest pistol ever made." My partner and I both moved on from working at that gun store, but this ugly revolver was NOT store inventory so we kept it. We tried to research it but no one knew anything about it (Too rare!). I had a table every month at the Saxet Gun Show, San Antonio, Texas, where I displayed this revolver with a banner that read "Winner of the Ugly Gun Contest four years in a row!" every month for several years. Meanwhile, I learned that it was manufactured in Argentina as some sort of compromise between an anti-gun government and a genuine need for the farmers/ranchers of Argentina who had a legitimate need for a firearm. THIS was a pistol that you could use to put an animal down, but NOT to start a revolution! Chambering was .22 short. The shooter needed to MANUALLY turn the serrated cylinder so that a live round was underneath the firing pin, then pull back on the bolt, (locking it to the rear in 'ready' position), then aim, fire, and repeat. To reload, the cylinder pin was removed and used to poke out the fired casings from the cylinder. A very inefficient process. The entire point of this long discourse is to warn my fellow gun-loving Americans is that if you permit the government to dictate to you what firearms you are "permitted" to own, you might be allowed to have a "Cabeza de Aguila" revolver. Do not allow the government to tell you what you are allowed to own. This is the United States of America and WE TELL THE GOVERNMENT HOW WE CONSENT TO BE RULED! Do not settl for what the government "permits" you to have. Vote THOSE jerks out of trying to CONTROL your life and decisions in the ONLY "Land Of The Free."
BTW, my friend and I traded possession of this pistol over the years because it belonged to both of us. It was with my friend when he died. I imagine that his son still owns it.
Most insanely Stoopid gun ban proposal I've EVER watched 😂
I remember the Thompsons in a barrell at Surplus store in 1963 for 300$ each
Last I checked I am a GOD fearing American I HAVE the right to bear arms
The Calico is cool but I have a couple friends that thought so also and had to have one, they are always broke down and have been sent back several times. POS in my book.
Mine worked flawless, back in the 80's.My new one works flawless on one mag so far as well.
I should have bought a street sweeper when I had the chance!
The one I was offered ACTUALLY had a 20 round drum!
Maybe some day I'll make one myself.
It show me the government’s complete and total incompetence.
FJB!
FTG! (Fuck the Government)
AROUND THE WORLD OUR LIBERTY IS AT STAKE = TIME TO WAKE UP AND FIGHT FOR TRUTH - JUSTICE - FREEDOM
1:05 You get a like for pointing that out. It doesn't make sense that if you made a plinker that fired .22 shorts but the spring was too crisp on the blowback, you'd get Seal Team 6'd for fast fingering the trigger like an American 180.. even though I'm pretty sure a thick leather jacket at 100 paces stops the anemic things.
>The most powerful rifle available to any civilian
- is actually the .950 JD Jones, or 4-bore rifles... But, of course, nobody talks about them, because the Barrett is popular, and there are only a handful of 950's out there, and 4-bores are old-school tech...
Solution to the scary looking guns they wanna ban.. Just put a smiley face 😊 stickers on them..!
Back in 2015 I had a chance to buy a .50 cal Barret in Canada, $8.500 CAD money wasn't the issue and to this day I don't really know why I didn't buy it... now they are illegal in Canada... ended up buying 5 M305 with 200 magazines which Trudeau also made illegal on me...
The government also doesn't want you to have a peice of land that everyone is entitled to
Homeboy called the tommy gun a “light weight sub machine gun.” 😂
thing weighs like 20ilbs!
Wow looking at Senater Feinstein in 2021 up until her recent passing is shocking. As shocking as letting her continue to lead the country at her age of decline.
Remember "gun control" has nothing to do with guns, it's all about control.....
And all laws and "rules" are unconstitutional af!
Get rid of the guns and their free to take control. Definition of gun control.
To be fair no one really needs a .50 cal sniper rifle. Unless you're hunting Elk, or Elephant
No form of government should be allowed to ban,restrict,or even regulate any type of firearm or anything that has to do with firearms!!!!
Make a law that the ATF and any government only has jurisdiction over the serialized parts. any add-ons are can not be regulated.
Microwaves aren't regulated by the ATF, do with that information as you will
I like how this video is a list of guns nobody wants
10:00)This is the US Navy Model.The rate of fire was slowed to 600 rounds per minute.10 a second.
10:20)The Civilian Model is 800 RPM.13.3333 a second. A 50 round drum is empty after 3.8 seconds of continuous fire. 100 round drum is dry in about 8 seconds.