DUI checkpoint refusal to answer cops
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2012
- Motorcycle rider is detained at a police roadblock and declines to answer questions. Stupid cops get butthurt and prolong the detention. Highway patrol Sgt. Farmer demands identification without suspicion of a crime. Note: Edit at 20s removes 4m of waiting in line.
Авто/Мото
That's a lot of tax payer funded standing around.
Must be a Union job. Lol
@@stevenbuckley4433 no they despise those remember?
It’s offset by the ticket and dui revenue
The usual
Hey you gotta put on a show if you want the public to think you’re legit. Lot of Doughnuts and coffee gathering.
Why is everybody against this guy?Who's just exercising his rights?
You people are sheep
I still watch this year after year.
Respect.
If you don’t exercise your rights, you lose your rights.
Good job.
The rider is under no obligation to help the officers with their investigation, and he doesn’t have to answer any questions. If it were me, I’d give them my license and registration (this is not a traffic stop, i.e. the rider is not suspected of any violation, so that may not be required), and that would be IT.
There was no investigation. There was no suspicion of a crime.
@@2strokeYardSale My favorite part was when at 2:25 the guy said "Why is that?" and you just stared at him like, "Bruh, that's ANOTHER question."
The way I see this is 1) You dont have to pull over and do what the law says which is kind of cool in a way as its all about freedom... but 2) who the fuck cares about having to do a quick DUI stop?? They're keeping drunk drivers off the road. Your actions show that you are against the prevention of drink drivers... What matters more: 5 minutes of your time, or preventing road accidents? You should thank the officers for the job they're doing, they're helping you to stay safe! Especially on a motor bike. If it the DUI checks were forced on you brutally than fuck yeah fuck the police but these guys were friendly
" 2) who the fuck cares about having to do a quick DUI stop?? "
I don't see where the driver indicated a thing about caring if it was there.
"Your actions show that you are against the prevention of drink drivers"
Opinion. I see that his actions show that the driver is willing to follow the law.
"What matters more: 5 minutes of your time, or preventing road accidents?"
Declining to answer questions here is legal. I don't see a correlation to doing something legal causes road accidents, unless you want the play the what-if game.
"You should thank the officers for the job they're doing,"
Declining to answer doesn't keep offcers from doing their job.
Harvey Wallbanger So if everyone declines DUI stops would the officers be able to prevent drink driving? Pretty sure it would stop them from doing their job
zedooncadhz "So if everyone declines DUI stops would the officers be able to prevent drink driving? "
I won't be discussing what-if logical fallacies with you.
Where, exactly, did this driver 'decline' the stop?
Harvey Wallbanger When you say you wont discuss "what-if logical fallacies" do you in fact mean that you are not open to intellectual debate? I've come to realise that they could actually still check for drunk drivers even if they decline questions. You didnt help me reach this conclusion though all you do is try to aggravate instead of educate
zedooncadhz"When you say you wont discuss "what-if logical fallacies" do you in fact mean that you are not open to intellectual debate?"
I won't discuss it because I find it a waste of time exploring a myriad of hypnotizes.
"I've come to realise that they could actually still check for drunk drivers even if they decline questions. "
Exactly.
"You didnt help me reach this conclusion..."
Nor did I want to.
“I can detain you for an hour. Just answer yes or no.” What a fucking joke.
They can only detain him for 20-30 seconds, whether he answers questions or not. The police were breaking the law here, not the motorist.
@@nightshade8958 Absolutely. They violated his civil rights and should be prosecuted. Let's hope they at least got some administrative discipline, whatever that is.
Your response if being detained at a traffic while always recording the incident is :
"My dear officer if you violate my Rights under U.C.C 1-308, then you are in agreement in forfeiting your government Indemnification Surety Bond and will also be personally liable under Civil and Criminal charges."
You're the joke.
I don't see why everyone is so down on this rider.
Because he was a little prick
@@johnsutton6693 He exercised rights, and maybe felt a responsibility to do so as a public service, considering how many cops totally disrespect the public they are paid to serve. He did not exhibit nearly the attitude many cops do, and posed no danger. Do you go around calling police prices when they get attitudes?
"I can detain you for an hour". That's code for "If you don't allow me to violate your rights I will retaliate".
For the life of me I've never understood how these are constitutional. Or border checkpoints that are well within the US border.
Those of you calling the biker various names should consider that it is possible the true answer to the question of whether he has recently had a drink might be 'yes'. Doesn't mean he's DUI, but he is not obliged to give the cops that info, and he'd be a fool if he did. But he'd be just as big a fool to lie and say no, because it's possible he was observed by other officers exiting a bar. The best policy is to exercise his right to remain silent, and not assist the cops in their fishing expedition.
The worst thing about this video is reading all comments of people telling you to give up your rights in order to "keep others safe." Hope you're doing well.
These are your peers when the state is assembling a jury of your peers.
@@2strokeYardSale America the ignorantly blissful people of Earth.
We deserve everything coming to us because we do nothing to stop any of it.
Well in Most of the world They do theese DUI stops, But all you are asked to do is blow in the Breathalyser. If that is fine you leave. No asking your name ID licence even... not before you fail your test.
Like wearing a worthless mask or taking a rushed "vaccine"
@@vincentkingsdale8334 - yes, it's the common theme: violating your rights for the safety of others.
He wasn't rude. Used his rights. And the situation ended properly.
Could things have gone faster if he answered, sure. But can't he check how the cops behave when a person uses their rights at the same time they do their checkpoint?
The argument that "if you don't have anything to hide, why hide things" is stupid. Your rights are yours to exercise as is, your privacy is your responsibility to try to maintain.
He was a prick
Well Josh, lets just hope the day comes when cops take ass holes like you into the woods and solve all your problems.
i think the real lesson here is why do so many leo's push to subvert you from the rights they themselves also have and knowingly,for profit attempt to deny you of.there are millions more citizens than cops and if things ever went sideways id not want millions of citizens against me.
@belelusat Yup. Kinda like a saying from Ben Franklin: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.🤔😜
And NEVER fly your kite in a thunderstorm!
If a person is more aware of his constitutional rights than the police officer then it is reasonable to believe that he is less impaired than the police officer.
How does handing over your license determine if you have been drinking? Seems like a scam to make more money by fishing for other problems like warrants, expired tag probation ect.
OTHER PROBLEMS? Like warrants for arrest for crime the POS have committed but haven't been caught - maybe murder, rape, child molesting, etc.
Fishing for other problems (warrants) you mean like for murder, rape, child molesting?
@@lamoe4175 Google statistics. DUI checkpoints neither catch people doing DUI, nor criminals that commited some kind of "first degree felony" (that's not even the checkpoint's job, lol). They exist either to generate profit by handing out tickets, or to retaliate against people who stood for their rights previously. And that's that.
Very good point because everyone is ultra hyper vigilant about their time being wasted the only time a person should be detained is if there is an obvious probable cause all the rest of it is psychobabble
The cowards just loves to violate our fourth amendment rights and they do not understand it’s illegal to do so
To anyone who thinks this guy should’ve just said no, you’re wrong. First off, whether this questioning is legal is questionable because there is no probable cause or even reasonable suspicion that he’s drunk. Second, when police are trying to talk to you about a crime, nothing you say can help you. Third, if he said no, the police could have continued to ask more questions, and anything you say during questioning can and will be used against you. Even innocent people will inevitably say something incriminating during questioning. Lastly, remaining silent does not make you look guilty. Doing so cannot be used against you and for the reasons above is the best course of action even if you’re innocent.
The douchebags in this video are the cops who are trying to convince people to waive their rights.
yeah a lot of these comments are from internationals who don't understand that evoking your rights isn't being difficult.
The Constitution clearly states the government must have reason to search you. Random by definition means no reason. All random searches are illegal.
a DUI check is not a random search!! Has absoluely nothing to do with the Constitution
@@pope406 It is, by definition, a random search. You're an idiot.
@@pope406 it has everything to do with the Constitution and you are a moron for thinking it doesn't. The cops don't get to be lazy and inconvenience the masses in order to catch a few
@@pope406 Go check my comment on frank a donaldson's post, to show you aren't wrong
i bet you learned that at trump university school of law taught by professor stu pid
Waste of taxpayer money.
These checkpoints yield very little dui arrest but millions being wasted. Should be out looking for thieves rapists and murderers. Easier to extort the people
So how do you do a checkpoint for a thief and a rapist. Look for the guy with the crowbar in his hand or the guy running down the street with his pants down. Or maybe a woman with her skirt up. I doubt anyone ever saw a murder in advance either.
Why do so many cops get so butt-hurt when people exercise their rights?
Because they're tyrants
Why are so many cops trying to trick people into giving up their rights?
Look at how many cops are just standing around with their hands in their pockets for their 150 to 200 grand a year while everybody, else is out Busting they nuts paying them
The average police salary is 54,000$ a year… not 150,000$ it was a simple google search to find that info. Lol
@@dennisreelie1720 that might be starting salary. Plenty of those guys standing around look like they got 1015 years on the job don’t believe everything from google simply.
your right that is their starting salary but again a quick google search would have told you that their average salary is $63,457 not 150k@@ericbassett6389
and next that police dept will want a budget increase to hire more cops🤣🤣🤣
Idk who actually is a certified law enforcement officer here but I am. We don't do these in the city I work in. The city council tried to make us do it once because we have a lot of drunk soldiers driving around but our chief refused. It is illegal. If I don't have a reason to stop you then I can't LEGALLY stop you. I can't just assume everybody is driving drunk and start demanding licenses and vehicle information unless I have probable cause. The majority of the time its the political figureheads who order this kind of stuff to fill their pockets with your money and it makes us look corrupt. For some reason everyone just refuses to question stuff. I've been told my whole career to stop questioning stuff and just follow orders. I just go full 6 year old and ask why a hundred times. Lol. It took a very long time to make Sergeant.
Interesting.
yea well I ride a motorcycle and was hit by a drunk driver. Maybe a check point could have prevented THAT!
Thank you for what you do, I have a cousin retired sheriffs office and my cousin Carl worked in law enforcement as well, I guess it’s just the respect I have for police that I question this behavior, stay safe
Thank you for questioning these beauraucratic edicts and trying to uphold the ACTUAL law. There needs to be more police like this and not just order followers
The most intelligent cop out here i appreciate your service keep it up
So an unlawful detainment and unlawful demand for id aren't worth an incident number.
I get the feeling that certain law enforcement agencies are specifically taught how to violate Constitutional Rights.
Someone should FOIA their training material and internal memos, etc.
There's a pattern here..
Apparently, many people in this comment section fail to comprehend 4 things:
1. Us citizens have constitutional rights.
2. DUI checkpoints are unconstitutional and inefficient (in what they should do, catch drunk drivers), they're purpose is "fishing".
3. Public servants are not your friends, they're trained to make you believe they are.
4. Everything you say (even the most innocent things and simple answers) can lead to truly awful stuff.
Unfortunately people are asleep and handing over their rights for peace and security.
They don't know what a constitution is 🙄
As someone who has read many thousands of comments over many years, they aren't interesting in trading rights for security or the illusion thereof. They are interested in conformity. The nail that sticks out must be hammered down.
@@2strokeYardSale agreed
Keep up the good work.
I do the same here in Ireland 👍
Those people don’t get it and never will , they obviously were raised from birth that way, when they were born they were automatically entered into a contract to be ruled and made subservient, socialism and kissing a governments ass isn’t the way to live, only death is real and by the time they die that’s all they will have , living at the wims of another human , humans can’t control humans and honestly they should mind there own business and stay in there own country if they don’t like it🤷
And see that's where you're wrong because DUI checkpoints are constitutional but they have to follow strict guidelines
The entire checkpont seems suspicious. There was no reason to make the rider stop further up. They wasted his time for no reason.
If he were just polite and answered the question he would have been in his way more quickly. He sounded like a defiant seventh grader
@@grl9917 you’re probably one of those who answers every question a piggy asks huh
They thought he was black. That's more than enough to get the guns out. Better to just shoot by sight
They say, “If you have nothing to hide you should have nothing to fear. Why should you care?” They don’t think about the origin of that quote, which is a piece of Nazi propaganda from Joseph Goebbles. Privacy is the foundation of all other rights. Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech, because you have nothing to say.
It would behoove us all to be weary of the phrase, “the innocent have nothing to fear.” For the innocent have everything to fear, an mostly from the guilty. But in the long term even more from those who say things like, “the innocent have nothing to fear.”
@celal t Normal has become very weak.
Cops, they're there when you don't need them and never around if you do.
You don't ever need them.
If we didn't.have cops who would come.to the scene after a crime.is committed and then never catch the criminal? If we didn't have cops who would shoot your dogs for barking at strangers in their own yard? Lol Never call the cops
@@2strokeYardSale sometimes they're useful. We don't wanna live in the purge
you have the right to remain silent - every frickin time, no matter what
The whole reason they ask a question is to either entrap you or to put you at ease for the entrapping question. When it comes to cops every question is a finely crafted loaded question. That they have practiced a hundred times before. To all who say just answer it. The jails are full of people who thought the samething.
Exactly. They're trained to rake in fines, not to protect. They're misprioritized
@@ryanconnolly1950 bro stfu your and uneducated fuck who believes is faries and unicors. Your a fucking idiot if you actually believe that. Step out of that stupid little head of yours and do some actual fucking research on polices, because most police would probably stop a bullet for your cop hating ass.
@@codymunro5709 love how you're calling someone uneducated and meanwhile you can barely spell basic words 🤣
Isn't that the truth and they're more crooked than the people they arrest
They are taught to lie, and parents know when you let someone continue to lie, they start to believe there own lies. Need to change officer code of conduct
A DUI checkpoint at 2:00 in the afternoon on a country road? What the hell is going on in this county?
Because it's not really about catching drunk drivers
@@bewickizer2457 yeah.
I thought checkpoints were unconstitutional? They violate unlawful detainment.
Michigan v. Sitz 1990
They are clearly unconstitutional. So are speed cameras. Of course they never let the constitution get in the way of revenue generation.
SFST are voluntary and would highly recommend you take advantage of that and DECLINE the SFST
Not unconstitutional. You have the right to not answer any questions. As long as you haven’t been drinking alcohol. They ask if you’ve had anything to drink. Of course he has. Water, juice, soda or milk.
@@fivegeeztv998 ha! You cops....bad advice always.
Violation of 4th Amendment.
I don't know why people get upset when a person decides to exercise their rights under the constitution.
The Constitution is the reason the US is a basket case. The world has moved on from your precious "Constitution" & is leaving the US behind.
@@myredute As a german, I like the US Constitution, could have helped 80 years ago…
Yeah, I agree.
Speaking for myself, I don't get upset about these kinds of things. I get a kick out of them. Then I go to the posts like these and laugh at them as well.
It's more of a laughing matter to watch some idiot waste his day, fucking around with some cops he doesn't know instead of just saying one word to move along with his day, "NO"
It makes me think this guy is just some keyboard warrior, like so many here and everywhere else with people posting their opinion then replying to them telling them "You're wrong" from thousands miles away.
It's just a joke to watch two things...
The initial video.
Then the idiots on here that say they will do the same thing but are lying their asses off when they'll end up kissing the cops ass if it happened to them
@@chrischapman276 Absolutely right Chris. I've been arguing with an idiot on here who thinks the complete opposite. Here in Australia, we'd rather get along with the police instead of confronting them but seems in the US, everyone here with low IQ, seems to think their Constitution rights will protect them. Good comment, well worth the read!
@@myredute And sir, I agree with your concept as well. There is one thing about kissing ass and looking like you are doing so. That doesn't fly with anyone anywhere. It's another to respect people you come across in life, let them do their job, not make it so anyone anywhere has a fcked up day at work and just KISS throughout life... KISS- KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.
These type on this video have entirely too much time on their hands to WANT to do this shit.
Then there are the keyboard warriors in life we all come across. Those that are still living at home, sitting in their underwear at 2PM but are also some WWF fighter that is going to hunt someone down and punch them in the dirt for having an opinion on these responses as well. Those one's are the one's I' LOVE to argue with... the TOUGH GUY... that has a small ..... very small.... amount of self security that love these vids!!!
18 freaking cops with nothing to do. Taxpayers getting screwed again.
did you really count them all
Honestly, catching drunk drivers is a good thing. But so is standing up for your rights. If they took a drunk or two off the road it probably saved taxpayers over the cost of an investigation into a deadly car crash. Based on when this was posted it was probably 4th of July weekend.
@@MDK2_Radio they'd probably catch more by patrolling and finding vehicles that are reasonably suspicious instead of standing around hoping one bumps into them.
My parents were almost killed by being hit by a drunk driver. America has a serious drinking and driving problem. However, I also don’t believe in checkpoints either as this runs constitutionally thin on people being able to freely travel without probable cause being utilized justly (no weaving, slow/fast driving, no impairment shown, etc).
I truly think officer resources are better used looking for drunks where they are usually found and displaying bad behavior. All DUI checkpoints do is waste people’s time, gets them upset and makes departments look bad in the public eye. I appreciate what all law enforcement do to protect the public but DUI checkpoints are not a wise idea for the public good. It comes across as a fascist style of law enforcement.
This is exactly how to handle this type of stop. A citizen has a right not to answer questions. The police know this very well. They had no indication he was impaired and cannot simply demand answers. The driver was polite but firm. He asked if they ordered him and then complied. The reason to ask if it is an order is that later their commands can be challenged in court if arrested. The conduct of the police may not be legal but don’t fight it at the side of the road. He did very well and remained polite at all times.
Well said.
Exactly. The side of the rode is not the place to argue. Always clarify if it is a command and frequently ask if I'm free to go. This shows you are willing to cooperate with lawful commands but do not wish to be there.
The problem is, ANYTHING you say CAN and WILL be used against you. The cops are not there to clear you, they are there to charge you. Read it and weep: ANY....THING.
What a pile of meaningless garbage. In my entire lifetime I have followed the rule of being polite, respectful and cooperative with the police.
I have NEVER had a problem, but then again I have never had anything in my car that would cause a problem.
On the few occasions I have been stopped, it has been for something like speeding and the best thing to do is to ADMIT IT, any arguing gets you NOWHERE. don’t forget that you are not the only JERK that police officers have to deal with.
I can only imagine my own attitude if I had to deal with smart mouthed idiots like you EVERY day.
Police officers are only human and not saints, treating them with respect and being HONEST IS THE SMART THING TO DO.
Maybe you are NOT VERY SMART.
They were looking for drunk drivers. You weren't already under arrest for crying out loud. They were there to remove drunk drivers from the road thats why the majority of people were sent on their way because a majority of the people were sober. But they've been doing this for decades now and it hasnt grown into some police state. Get over it
@@jackcleary4027 Nothing wrong with drunk driving, bootlicker. Maybe if bitch cops didn't treat people like shit, people would drink less?
@@jackcleary4027 they were *looking* for chances to generate revenue. "Finding drunk drivers" is just a pretense they use.
@@SeisanStnc i don't buy that for one minute. Yes alot of money is brought in if alot of tickets are issued but to say thats the ONLY reason is too shallow. I don't know if you have known someone well that was killed by a drunk driver but i knew three people in separate accidents and all were under age 35. And still you hear it all the time someone or even multiple people that are now gone because of someone's poor decision to drive while drunk. These checkpoints have never bothered me and they never will
A lot of people here licking the boot. I can only assume they think that police officers are naturally good people. And most of them are! But, as the saying goes, a few bad apples spoil the bunch. Here we see a classic bad apple situation.
A man, who has literally done nothing wrong, is stopped by police. That already should not happen. The police do not have the ability to just pull you over whenever they want. They need to be able to articulate exactly why, otherwise it's an illegal stop.
Next, the officer punishes this man for not providing documents. Being secure in your papers is your 4th amendment right. The officer has no reasonable suspicion that this cyclist has committed any crime, and as such has no right to ask for an ID or driver's license.
Finally, the officer clearly does not understand the 5th amendment. Our cyclist here cannot be forced or compelled to speak to an officer. Even if he has committed a crime, even if he had performed a traffic violation, he does not need to answer or respond to the officer in any way.
This man was unlawfully detained and unlawfully searched. These police officers committed crimes. Now, sure, they probably did it for a good reason. They probably did it to make sure no drunk drivers were on the roads. But it's still a crime, and good intentions don't make good excuses for committing crimes.
@@jacksaylor1450
Care to elaborate on how I'm wrong about the 4th and 5th amendments, Jack?
If he is driving a vehicle police can legally ask for a drivers license. How can you go on such a rant and not know this? Driving a vehicle is not a right. If he is just walking down the street and a cop asks to see ID for no reason then you would have a case. The motorcyclist was an asshole but at least he knew this - you don't.
@@visearms5774
You are correct.
However, police do not have the ability to pull you over for no reason. When an officer asks you to identify during a traffic stop, they're doing so because a traffic violation is a crime. This man committed no crime, nor did he do anything that would initiate a traffic stop. As such, he should not have been stopped and detained, and they had no right to ask for his driver's license.
I'm not a sovereign citizen talking about how road pirates just stole his soul or whatever. Cool your jets, and maybe learn the law and your own rights a bit.
@@someguy4384 Funny expression - cool my jets. Surprisingly that's exactly what your mom said to me last night after she put the handcuffs on me if you know what I mean.
The sergeant says he is sorry to inconvenience the driver. But of course he isn’t sorry. Which illustrates a characteristic of American cops: They are habitual liars and will do so even when they gain no benefit from the lie and when the lie is trivial to detect. Both apply here.
It clearly is insincere to claim to be sorry for the brief detainment when it is being repeated 100s of times an hour at this one check point.
Perfect example of why the US isn’t better than any other country. PAPERS SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS
And it's "suspicious" and/or "obstruction" if you don't obey them
I have to say that these policemen were extremely civil. Compliments to them in how they handled this asshole.
Pafoofnik1 I don't see it so much as violation. See no matter what you do in life, there's always that 10% that drag us down. In this case it's the epidemic numbers of drunk driving accidents , committed buy who ? That pesky 10% . I'm the first to say the gubbament has too much control over things.. but in this case I think it's justified, if it saves one life .. I'll take the inconvenience of my "civil rights" which is something I defended while I was a Marine. But then again, I have nothing to hide, nothing to prove, the world is a cold unfair place. Learn to live with or keep tilting at windmills ...
Dan Barrett
said: "I don't see it so much as violation... I think it's justified, if it saves one life."
It doesn't really matter what you think is a violation of the law, or what I think is a violation of the law.
It's what the courts think is a violation of the law.
"It's what the courts think is a violation of the law." It's also what a maimed person thinks, and what the parents of a dead child think.
Dan Barrett
While I don't agree with you in the least, I respect your opinion Mr. Barrett. One question, if I may, you volunteered to be a marine, right?
It's Marine, always and yes I volunteered ..
Sign is incorrect. It should read POLICE STATE AHEAD.
Knowing that, why make clown with them????? Must be very idiot to do that!
Lol.
Traker, i assume that you live In some part of the world where you have no rights against the police. We do. It just gets skipped over because people are lazy and weak.
The number of people thinking the biker is in the wrong is astounding and a fine illustration of the state of our nation, and the problem with democracy.
Your problem we are not a democracy
We need to outlaw dui checkpoints. They are just an excuse to violate 4a. Outlaw booze if you are so concerned with safety. Oh thats right, anything to make money.
@@markmurphy137 Read my message again.
@@navigator1372 Yep.
indoctrination centers aka public schools have failed our youth.
He has the right to not answer questions.
"Keeping the roads safe" riiiight
I see no problem he exercised his right
That's a whole lot of cops standing around doing nothing
So many men showing they are not responsible when given power over others, ego seems to be more important than freedom.
" Sorry to inconvenience you" but if you dont assist me as i am trying to violate your rights by not answering questions i have no right to demand you answer like " have you been drinking," I will be a tyrant with a badge and a gun and needlessly delay the stop, and try to intimidate and harrass you until you do. That 3 striper should be ashamed of himself.
If this was strictly a DUI checkpoint, that's all they should be able to do. Ask a few questions to determine sobriety and citizens can refuse to answer those questions
Interesting how people condemn YOU for folllowing the law.
This dui checkpoint is just an excuse to search you and your vehicles.
These random road blocks should be illegal.
They are in certain states.
they are
What everyone is missing, is that the ruling in Miranda v Arizona was that the police must advise you that you do not have to answer questions, before they start asking any questions! So any questions at a DUI check point, must be prefixed by a warning that any thing you say may be used against you, before asking you if you have had a drink!
The Court held that “there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves.” As such, “the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
Moreover in Robbins v City of Des Moines, the Justices ruled that a detainment is a arrest, if you are unable to freely leave!
There is a misunderstanding by the Cops that this only applies to a person who has been arrested for criminal offence, that is not true!
Way to distort Miranda. The ONLY TIME Miranda applies, is if you are told that you are being placed under arrest. You’re like a jailhouse lawyer aren’t you? You googled Miranda v. Arizona, clicked the Wikipedia hit & regurgitated what was there. Nice job. Smdh
And the caveat of being ‘being deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way’ goes away with ‘probable cause’.
If you are stopped at a LEGALLY ORCHESTRATED DWI CHECKPOINT, and refuse to cooperate, that in and of itself MAY give LEO’s probable cause. And if you’re acting like a douche nozzle, expect probable cause to be a part of your life in the immediate future.
@@Willie_McBride You just described how they make the illegal legal by being corrupt and acted like its a good thing. Refusing to allow someone to violate my rights isn't enough of suspicion for a crime, if it was then this wouldn't be the USA it'd be Soviet Russia
@@johnsimth6587 Randomized DWI Checkpoints hold up in court all the damned time. Just stop with the whole ‘Every cop is out to violate my civil rights, so I’m just not gonna cooperate with them ever’. Maybe that checkpoint is gonna nab the drunk behind the wheel who might go flying down the highway, blow a red light & T-Bone a car with your wife & kids in it. You’ll be the one screaming WHY WAS THAT DRUNK ON THE ROAD?!?
C’mon man, don’t be ‘that guy’. If you’re not drunk, then a few questions and 60 seconds of your time aren’t a violation of your rights, or even a minor inconvenience. And if you are drunk, those same few questions, & that same 60 seconds may be what just saved somebody’s life.
I think the point of this video was to show us how to ruin the clutch on a motorcycle.
Ha, ha... thats a good one. I fell for the constitutional issues everyone is talking about when in fact it really was a how NOT to operate a motorcycle!
A random check of "your papers.' Sounds like a forth amendment violation.
Not so random. Did you see them checking zee papers of other motorists? No, just the one who declined to answer questions.
If your under the influence on a bike it usually figures it self out.
And if they stopped him b4 he ran into and killed a family member of yours I'm sure you'd be grateful
@@johnbalogna803 I have a family member who had been crippled since the 80s from drunk driver. I only ment that bikers who drink die
John bologna sleep well
Man BOOTLICKERS ABOUND IN HERE!!!
"Those who would trade their freedom for security deserve neither." Ben Franklin
Perfect quote
That was back when most people where able to protect them selves, our government soften us up for a reason
He owned slaves lol
If he lived in todays world he would probably have a different point of view.
@@allenleanhart5503 Oh no a gun freak, this country has 45% of the worlds guns and we are about the most dangerous nation to live in.
Yes, guns are so useful at making us UNSAFE.
Wow look at all those cops! Wonder how much this event cost the taxpayers. We have so much freedom in America!!!
Actually, I got the receipts from the highway patrol and could tell you how much it cost.
Hope you find your safe space, snowflake.
It cost the taxpayers a lot more when their family member is killed by some ass hole who gets behind the wheel drunk, dick lips.
Rights are likes muscles, if you don't exercise them, you'll eventually lose them.
Exactly, fuck these cowards. What did they do in the Uvalde school shooting?
Why don't they just setup a sign that says "crime check point: if you have broken any law please pull yourself over so we can ticket/arrest you" . This is a waste of time, money and resources.
Only a waste if you support criminals.
like 20 cops just standing around fishing for ticketable infractions.
Of course! Then they run your ID in the system & hope that they catch something. They have no thing better to do with taxpayers commerce.
@@teddygee7859, if you think you can do better, why not become a cop and show them how it’s done? I’ll bet they’ll welcome you with open arms!
It was 4th of July weekend (check the upload date) so I'm glad they had such a checkpoint. But this guy handled himself and stood up for his rights well. And the cops were able to see he was sober so in a way it was a win-win.
@@sf7708 I think I know Teddy. I'm pretty sure he is a cop 🤔
Its called doing your job. Get one guy..
Why would you talk to someone who has the legal right to lie to you and records your words to use against you?
In the jurisdiction in which I live the statistics show that regular patrols catch DUI drivers at a rate 4x higher than check stops. What a waste of resources, 4-8 officers at one location. But we think the real reason is to slowly turn us into a "Papers, please!" society.
All we need to do to stop this is everybody exercising their right to remain silent. But it's far easier to simply comply.
Well said!
Irre papiere, bitte! SCHNELL!!!
@@heathparkhurst3011 Danke, kamerad.
Glad to see another highly intelligent comment 💯💪🏾🫡
because he has a camera rolling and the evidence
We all have duties, LEO’s must swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Citizens are who the Constitution was written to protect. Disrespecting citizens Rights is failure to uphold the oath.
It’s serious for reasons, one is called respect, it’s a two way street…
The point of this person's video is that checkpoints are human rights violations. If you submit to this, you will submit to anything.
Yeah, ID proves that you have been drinking earlier that day doesn’t it.
The purpose of that question was to exercise control. Whoever asks the questions has the control. His consistent refusal to answer questions robs the cops of their control and dominance
Most people don't understand this. You DO NOT HAVE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. Your Miranda rights state, "ANYTHING YOU SAY, CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU IN A COURT OF LAW"
This is how you use the law against them. "I DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS"
Well done sir. But no ID unless there was a traffic infraction.
Kinda stupid to put up a DUI checkpoint in the middle of the day with that amount of manpower. They probably nabbed a guy with a cracked windshield so the chief and the taxpayers wouldn't be pissed off.
Yeah there goes my day drinking and cruising plans....
What a waste of taxpayer money. Look how many cops are out enjoying the day, probably with time and a half pay. Also, how does showing your ID indicate if you've been drinking?
Thank you sir. I salute your patriotism.
See right there that cop broke the law . The biker did nothing wrong but the officer made him pull over to the side of the road.
"I told you no questions"
"You are free to go"
Says it all right there
With this presence of mind he can't be drunk ;-)
@@christianherzig1575 and with no probable cause or reason to believe he could be, it’s irrelevant
Actually you are not allowed to tell an officer when they're finished asking questions. They'll decide that. It's so stupid anyway. If you have nothing to hide then you answer the question and go on your merry way.
@@andrewgill6770 Or…if you have nothing to hide, you don’t answer any questions, and go on your merry way.
@@mikeg1378 No. If I'm the officer and you don't answer my questions, I detain you. Because again, I'll ascertain that you are hiding something.
I can't believe this has a 70% thumbs down. The motorcycle driver is standing up for his right to NOT have his freedom infringed upon. The cops don't have the "BLANK CHECK" right to do a DRAGNET search & survey of the citizenry. They wanted him to raise his visor so they could smell his breath and look at his eyes. That's illegal search & survey. They didn't have probable cause or any legal reason to pull him over. He wasn't speeding, he didn't have any malfunctioning lights. Listen, people. If you give up your rights you'll get walked on by jack booted dictators at some point in a fascist / police state future. The U.S. Government in modern times - since about 1968 - hates the freedoms that the Constitution GUARANTEES us. They want martial law so they can NULLIFY the Constitution. We ARE headed in that direction. Slowly. Your rights... OUR rights... were fought for, won, and have been secured with the BLOOD and very LIVES of our ancestors. If you give up those rights, and they CAN be given up easily, they will NEVER be given back to you or your children or your grandchildren. They will have to be FOUGHT for AGAIN in order to get them back. I have been WELL educated by the teachers I have been so FORTUNATE to have had in my school. Also very educational was the fact that my father was a police officer and he "clued me in" on the fast & loose behavior of people in positions of authority.
If the constitution guarantees someone can't be seized without a warrant, how is it that this video shows agents of the state doing exactly that?
@@2strokeYardSale; because they're overstepping the boundaries of their authority and people aren't challenging them by knowing and standing up for their rights.
@@2strokeYardSale Did u not understand that this guy was agreeing with you lol🤦♂️
@@mrbruh3822 oh no he understands; he's just pointing out what an unconstitutional dystopian shithole we're allowing ourselves to be pushed into for the benefit of everyone else who would also say "but cops can't do that it's illegal"
He's using case and point
"They just did"
Are they expecting someone who has been drinking to admit it?
Apparently you can tell if someone is drunk by looking at their driver’s license.
Nope. They usually lie but when someone is inebriated from alcohol their will be physical indicators present.
Alcohol has a strong odor, the person may slur their words or their eyes will appear glassy.
The person may also have a difficult time keeping their balance or following basic instructions.
Before you get angry just know that this checkpoint is not designed to stop drunk drivers, it's a revenue source.
That is supposed to reduce my anger?
"Oh, you're only doing this for money? Well alrighty then, carry on."
Lots of bootlickers in the comment section....
Why not let cops go further check your pockets, car, house, search history, bank accounts. Hey, it may save lives.
All lives matter
@Karla Aguilar since you put it so eloquently, I change my stance.
Exactly, after all “ it’s for public safety” or “ it’s all about the children”. That way the children can grow up in a world with no rights because we gave them away to protect them.
@@gelato3299 how about the cows, chickens, and pigs you have and will be eating?
They pulling granny's over giving traffic citations. But we're suppose to trust them. LOL
"Have you had anything to drink today, sir?" What kind of stupid, pointless question is that? Everyone is going to say no, regardless.
>Everyone is going to say no
Here we have audio and video of a person who didn't say no.
Crazy how many folks in this comment section actually think the rider is at fault.
Apparently if you ride with a helmet cam or drive with a dash cam, you are up to no good.
@@2strokeYardSale What many don't understand is a dash cam can be the only thing between you and police brutality.
yeah i know....uneducated fools
Crazy at my age over half way to 100 and never had an issue l will say as a CDL driver randoms are just that random and still haven't been tackled beaten you don't have to like it but action reaction...l think this is more of a generation issue but whatever you feel you need to do, what's the big deal no l haven't had anything to drink....okay have a nice day takes all of a few seconds out of my life! More important things or battles to fight in a lifetime.
@@jerryellis5289 and what's the big deal with not wanting to answer questions too ? Is the 5 amendment after all
Unbelievable how much money we got standing around at this stop
Until a drunk driver kills someone
@@wesleybrown6974 "those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety"
@@wesleybrown6974 in the middle of the day this is not to catch drunk drivers 😂😂 but a boot eater like you doesn't question the law. Do you know why they didn't want run his lincese after he asked for an incident number?
@@angelmedina2762 Unlawful stop and he's got all the video.
I wonder how much money the state made vs. their pay that day
To all the people saying things like "just give them what they want"/"it would have been over in much less time if he would have just answered the questions"/"this is escalating the situation unnecessarily"
Ever heard of the 4th amendment? Unwarranted searches and seizures. Yes, these cops were doing checks. No, the checks were not constitutional.
If you don't exercise your rights, they become seen as obsolete.
DUI checkpoint is legal and can prevent accidents. I ride a motorcycle and have been hit by a fucking drunk driver . You can go fuck yourself.
@@chopperchopster it is obvious that you don't see my point. The main problem with telling someone off at first contact is that they will be less likely to listen.
We can definitely talk, if you like. Also, please don't be a troll/rude.
@Debbie Hellion sorry for your loss, but Anon Y Moose absolutely has a say and it’s 100% equal to yours. Your grief doesn’t give you righteousness over him. Sadly DUI checkpoints haven’t made much impact on the incidence of DUI’s so it’s far from certain your daughter’s killer would have been taken off the road. Again, I am sorry for your loss.
@Debbie Hellion I never said they weren't.That wasn't the point. (Not that legal is a measure of whether something's right or wrong.) BTW, mourning or not, your silly outburst on my channel is a measure of your character.
@Debbie Hellion After your second immature post, I'm pretty sure you're lying about losing anyone to a DUI. Shame on you.
Cop: “I didn’t pull you over”
Video: you literally ordered him to pull over.
Charles, your picture looks like that fat slob Michael Moore, and you sound twice as stupid as he is.
What is everyone bitchin about?
Biker was respectful and knows his rights.
@Bidens Leg HairBZZZZZZZ! Wong anser. If you are operating a motor vehicle you MUST surrender your license to be operating that vehicle on public roads when asked by law enforcement.
A passenger does not have to show ID. A person walking does not have to show ID. You dont have to show ID when parked in a parking lot. THE LINE though is operating a motor vehicle on public roads.
@@robjohnson8522 "BZZZZZZZ! Wong anser. If you are operating a motor vehicle you MUST surrender your license to be operating that vehicle on public roads when asked by law enforcement."
When asked? No, this is not true.
@@harveywallbanger1738 Hey, believe whatever myth you wish.
@@robjohnson8522 Do you claim that 'if you are operating a motor vehicle you MUST surrender your license to be operating that vehicle on public roads when asked by law enforcement?'
@@harveywallbanger1738Yes, exactly.
The plain language is very clear. A driver "shall display the [operator's license] upon demand of any police officer ..."
Any other time a cop must have reasonable articulateable suspicion (RAS) you have committed a crime or about to commit a crime to ask for your ID.
That is the only reason these commie checkpoints are legal at all.
The cop asked the U.S citizen if he had anything to drink today. The biker should ask the cop if he brushed his teeth today and showered. Stopping anybody who has not broken the law is illegal. Cops are law enforcement officers and can only enforce the laws. If you did not break a law then the cops can not detain you and interrogate you.
Oh i hope they will continue,its to late to stop a drunk idiot after he have killed a family
@@haraldgunnes2127 Instead of patrolling the roads and keeping a look out for dangerous drunken drivers, the cops set up a blockade while the dangerous drunk drivers are free to drive around as long as they don't go through the check point where all the cops are stationary at.
@@tomthumb5860 What about the ones that are arrested at these checkpoints isn’t that a good thing? Or should we let them drive
And if he did ask the officer if he had brushed his teeth and showered, and the officer replied yes, would this guy have then answered the officer's question? You know he wouldn't have. This guy is just a trouble maker. I was raised to be polite and get along with my peers. Probably the difference of being brought up as a farm girl versus city kids. We appreciate our neighbors and respect our elders, our ministers, and our civil servants.
@@dawnpeterson1269 Agreed. But when bad cops are out to harass the public to fill thier quotas to bring in revenue for the city then the people need to stand up for thier rights. Government is run by corrupt, greedy politicians who would sell thier own mother if they could get a dollar out of it.
Damn from these comments I can see why cops feel free to violate law abiding citizens rights on a regular basis. If you have not broken the law you shouldn’t b inconvenienced or questioned as if you are a criminal. Exercising your right to remain silent doesn’t make u an ass since anything u say can b used against u. Some of these comments are disturbing af 🤦🏾♂️
He’s obviously not drunk so let him move on
Good job. We have the right to travel freely without being questioned or stopped unless we violate the law.
Hey idiot they are there to protect innocent people from drunk drivers duuuhhhh🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@karensmith1685
Hey idiot... you don't fkn say??
Hence, he said UNLESS we violate the law. Meaning they should target impaired drivers who they suspect of dui not anybody they feel like in an attempt to incriminate people.
Do you get detained for the purpose of investigation of any other crime.. e.g. assault, robbery, murder????
No! Only if they can demonstrate reasonable articulable suspicion can they detain you or stop you from going about your private affairs.
That's the fkn point, idiot! 🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@freak1sees714 hey moron ITS A CHECK POINT THEY DONT KNOW WHOS IMPAIRED UNTIL THEY STOP THEM ALSO WHATS WRONG WITH PROVIDING AN ID UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE GEEEZ STUPID PEOPLE NEED NOT COMMENT
@@karensmith1685
SMFH....!!!! Do you get stopped and investigated for any other random crime?? Have you ever gone through a burglar checkpoint??
Have you ever been randomly stopped and quizzed about committing any murders lately??
Have you ever bothered to research and learn what the law is? What jurisdiction do cops have? What your inalienable rights are? What the difference between law and legal is? What legalese is? What the difference between laws, legalization, statutes, regulations is?
Do you know what freedom of movement means? Do you know what the definition of 'person' 'vehicle' 'driving' 'passenger' 'road' in court is??
Didn't think so.. just another @ssh0le with a big mouth and no fkn clue... what was it you said... stupid people need not comment?
Ironically ironic ey.... you absolute muppet!!
@@karensmith1685
Ohh and to answer your idiotic question...
1. Because THE LAW says I don't have to. Supreme court ruling.
2. Because I HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG.
3. It violates my constitutional right to have freedom of movement without hindrance or harrassment.
You know, the constitution that the cops took an oath to uphold..
4. Until I break the law, THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION.
6. I've represented myself 3 times in court and won every time. Because I'm not stupid enough to get on a public forum and think Im right and I know what I'm talking about without having done my due diligence. I dont want to look and sound utterly stupid. Something you have no shame in doing.
5. Idjiots who don't bother researching the law and think their opinion has any value should get a mental health assessment done as they're suffering from a borderline personality disorder and or narcissism. That's you.
Anything else you want to add genius?
So many people on here calling the motorcyclist an asshole..
Without probable cause, these detentions are illegal. You have the right to travel unmolested. As soon as he said he didn’t answer questions, the next response should have been “you are free to go.” Because that is so foreign to the people in the comments, it’s easier to vilify the guy riding the bike. He didn’t do anything wrong.
If inspections like this get one drunk driver off the road, it may even save your life one day. No need to exercise your rights at every cost..
yea, idk.
the motorcycle guy sounds pretty cool to me. everyone should act like this, cause when they don't you get the other kind of videos on youtube where police are fucking you up for no reason.
these videos actually teach you something, unlike the others were police are drawing their guns on people and they don't know what to do.
@@Harry131aba patrol cars are shown to find many more drunk drivers than DWI stops. These are an excuse to generate money off of minor infractions. You have the right to travel unmolested.
@@Harry131aba its known as "a foot in the door" give up a little freedom today, you'll be surrendering more of them tomorrow.
It’s a DUI check point. How stupid are you people. It’s set up to keep the innocent driver’s safe and alive. He chose to drive that road now do what everyone else is doing and answer the question. It’s not like he was picked out of a crowd to be harassed. You sound like those cop hating attorneys who think they know the law. It’s idiots like that that escalate very small issues into a big deal then wonder why the cops kick the shit out of them.
This is how you respectfully assert your rights as there is no reasonable suspicion to believe the person in the video had been drinking at the time. There are lots of videos like this out there and a good majority of them consist of the civilian actually being a dick, raising their voice, having a rude tone, etc. There were a couple times the person in the video asked "is that an order" and when the cop said "yes" he obliged and obeyed the order. Most of the videos like this one that I've seen, the person being detained is being belligerent, rude and condescending and almost every single time it leads to an unnecessary confrontation. This incident did not lead to a confrontation, the biker was able to leave not 5 mins after being detained unmolested. If your goal is to assert your rights, be respectful but stern. If the situation escalates, let it be because the cop was the one who escalated it, not you. As others have pointed out, it is reasonable to believe that maybe these cops didn't know or realize these checkpoints are unconstitutional. Educating them of that by respectfully asserting your rights is also reasonable. If the cops in the video did know these checkpoints are unconstitutional but participated in them anyway, shame on them!
To all those who don't like this video, how do you feel about how the police are treating the Freedom Convoy Protesters in Ottawa right now? Should they just lay down and lick the boots of the cops and obey their orders without question? I have a feeling that you will more than likely have a different impression of the Freedom Convoy protesters than you would this guy when BOTH are asserting their rights.
Here we have another person who is more interested in showing deference to the criminals holding the rider hostage than the underlying rights violations and overt crimes.
Anybody in a similar situation can be quiet, can talk minimally, or can spew as much invective toward the cops as they see fit. They deserve nothing but contempt.
@@2strokeYardSale If you have done nothing wrong why are you afraid to say so?
You comply and provide them with ID; and politely say when asked a question, "I don't answer questions" or "any statement I make I want my lawyer present." If yojndontnsat anything, they would have to arrest you based on what they witnessed or someone else witnessed. But you didn't incriminate yourself. Very important.
See police are trying to figure out if they are going to arrest you. Once they put you in custody, you get Mirandized. Any incriminating statements you make before the Miranda warning are certainly admissible if relevant.
Unconstitutional stops are my favorite
ID demand must have a crime first. A check point is not a crime area to require ID
Huh?.....ALL DRIVERS MUST PROVIDE THREE THINGS TO ANY OFFICER STOPPING THEM in a traffic stop 1.) a driver's license 2.) registration of the vehicle 3.) proof of insurance. Beyond that......."With all due respect officer, I don't answer questions". "Am I free to go now?"
@@JimCampbell777 only if there is a crime first.
@@JimCampbell777 ...at a traffic stop, where a person is detained under individualized suspicion of violating a motor vehicle law. This type of DUI checkpoint does not fit this description.
@@harveywallbanger1738 facts. this is a process that needs to stop. they are literally detaining you without any probable cause.
@@rjaudon13 Yep.
You legally don't have to answer any questions. I think he is just trying to prove a point. He obviously isn't drunk.
Why is it that so many are willing to give up their Constitutional rights? Just because you are willing to give up your rights in the name of a supposed "safety", does not mean I have to give up my rights. It has nothing to do with supporting drunk driving, being difficult, or any other rediculous accusations that will be brought up. I don't drink alcohol or take drugs and I hope that anyone operating a vehicle in such a manner is stopped and does suffer the consequences of such actions. It is a matter of government over reach and loss of Constitutional rights. It's that simple, stop taking the easy way out and giving up your rights in the name of safety. Look up a wise old bird named Benjamin Franklin and see what he has to say about it. The founding fathers knew a thing or two about this very issue.
Ron Reynolds exactly! This guy explains it ruclips.net/video/d-7o9xYp7eE/видео.html
Their mindless drones
My guess is that the founding fathers had something this guy didn't. They had respect and decency. Wasn't it Abraham Lincoln that rebuilt the south after the civil war? George Washington that stood for the middle class? John Adams that made sure the Constitution was established and respected? The list is endless of how much respect was shown by the founding fathers and the men that came after. The problem is these days you have a group of self important and self entitled people who think they have the right to be what they want and act accordingly.
@Go Brandon A name caller, how refreshing, we haven't seen anything like that in a long time. Let's walk through your comment and discuss a few things. The fact that the Supreme Court has ruled that this kind of stop by law enforcement is legal does not mean that you have not lost your Constitutional rights. The Supreme Court has ruled many times on issues in the past in which the rulings have gone directly against the Constitution. Many of the rulings have been overturned at a later time and many are still in practice today. I'll just throw out a few to make my point : Dred Scott vs Sanford in which black people, slave or free, were not intended to be citizens and had no rights.
Buck vs Bell in which forced sterilization could legally by performed on persons of intellectual disabilities for the "protection and health of the state", Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Korematsu vs United States where Japanese Americans were forced into internment camps during WW2 without being charged with any crimes solely on the fears of espionage and the thought that they may support Japan over their home country of the United States.
Plessy vs Ferguson that basically went against the 14th amendment and allowed all kinds of laws based on race, better known as Jim Crow laws, that took Constitutional rights away from citizens.
Let's look at laws closer to modern times: Smith vs Maryland that allows government to have access to you private information without your consent that violates the 4th amendment.
Harlow vs Fitzgerald, aka qualified immunity, in which the Supreme Court decided on its own to shield government from being held accountable for violating your rights no matter how bad the behavior. Amazingly enough, no such law was crated by Congress. The Supreme Court has no legal ability under the Constitution to conjure up such things or to make law. This violation of the Constitution is still going strong and is the subject of lawsuits and debate to this day.
Bennis vs Michigan, aka civil asset forfeit. The government can seize and keep you property by mearly claiming that they suspect you of a crime. No proof needed, no charges filed, and no conviction of a crime required. A violation of the 5th amendment.
Kelo vs City of New London, another violation of the 5th amendment that greatly changed and perverted eminent domain.
I'll wrap this up by saying that just because the Supreme Court has ruled on something, does not mean that they have not directly ruled against Constitutional rights. Trying to reverse those rulings is extremely difficult and few politicians want or dare to call the Supreme Court to task and to fix these rulings. Many politicians, governments, and law enforcement agencies greatly benefit from these unconstitutional rulings. So Mr Go Brandon, you can claim that these DUI check points have been ruled legal by the Supreme Court, but that does not mean that your Constitutional rights aren't being violated. I have done my research and provided multiple examples of such violations throughout history and I will add that there are more if you care to do some research yourself. I will also add that I do support law enforcement when it is followed within the confines of the Constitution, but that seems to be something that is less and less these days. I would also hope that you would fight for your rights, otherwise you will loose those rights and have to live with the consequences. I would hope that you would research the founding fathers and understand why the Constitution and the Bill of rights was created and why the additional Constitutional amendments were written. Next time, leave the name calling out, it's beneath you and takes away from an intelligent conversation and exchange of ideas.
@Go Brandon Again with the name calling and sarcastic, superior attitude? You are the very reason why the Constitutional rights are being trampled upon and taken away. Benjamin Franklin had you in mind when he spoke about giving up freedom for security, you deserve neither. Apparently you are wise enough to decide that others must give up their Constitutional rights. Where does it end? You should change your screen name as you are also the reason people are chanting "Go Brandon".
Got that pesky little problem called the 4th and 5th amendments.
The cops were real Troopers ( Pun Intended) on this one. The rider has the right to remain silent, and many times it's what you should do when pulled over.
If cops could get the heck out of the road and leave people alone that would be great.
Mark Sky the Off-Grid RV Guy you must be an idiot too.
@@DRG3824 Just enjoy freedom more than unnecessary cops who want to scam people for money. The police state in this country is out of control. Did the guy seem drunk and falling over? No, so they should get out of the way and stop reaching for any excuse to impose on people's privacy and freedom. They don't care about people, they will act like your best friend to get answers out of you then use it against you. It's just what they're trained to do, to be decietful towards hard working Americans and then toss them in the slammer like trash and suck the cash out.
@@LawnWrangler323 if you haven't committed a crime then what answers would they get out of you, unless you have in fact committed a crime? And cops don't make commission for arresting ppl, traffic stops, etc. So of your incisting that cops try to arrest everyone they can because they get more money from it then your mistaken, because they don't. Cops get the same pay check whether they arrest 1 person, or 100 people for the pay period lol.
Right in the middle of the day? Looks like a fund raiser to me.
There's plenty of morning drinkers out there. google the police chief that got a DUI at 10am. It happens at all hours.
@@worlds_okayest_pilot bud I don't live under a rock. Check points should be at night when the bars are popping. During the day is a hey let's all pow wow on the highway and write tickets, then all get off and have some drinks.
Revenue generators
More money 💰 needed
Revenue generation stop
that's alot of oath breakers.
For every person that ever says if you have nothing to hide it or haven’t done anything wrong. Just answer
You’re an embarrassment and need to learn your Rights
I hate it when people say that. Some people froth on being governed I can't comprehend it I want to shoot my mil when she says it.
They only say that when it doesnt affect them, but when it does, they think differently. That's when it too late. Wake up people.
Yeah, these people are fucking pathetic.
Not your job to teach them.
A convicted felon with a camera