DUI checkpoint refusal to answer cops
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024
- Motorcycle rider is detained at a police roadblock and declines to answer questions. Stupid cops get butthurt and prolong the detention. Highway patrol Sgt. Farmer demands identification without suspicion of a crime. Note: Edit at 20s removes 4m of waiting in line.
You are under NO OBLIGATION to answer any questions.
@@jgarber1 a simple “no” to the question “anything to drink.” But no, he had to be an asshole.
@@bradeamer8147 the assholes were the ones stopping his day… all policy enforcers are assholes all day every day.
@@bradeamer8147 asshole is when defending constitutional rights
@@bradeamer8147anything you say can be evidence don’t say shit don’t be nice they are not your friends!
I don't see why everyone is so down on this rider.
Because he was a little prick
@@johnsutton6693 He exercised rights, and maybe felt a responsibility to do so as a public service, considering how many cops totally disrespect the public they are paid to serve. He did not exhibit nearly the attitude many cops do, and posed no danger. Do you go around calling police prices when they get attitudes?
True tho 😅, these days everyone forget their rights to remain silence
The Constitution clearly states the government must have reason to search you. Random by definition means no reason. All random searches are illegal.
a DUI check is not a random search!! Has absoluely nothing to do with the Constitution
@@pope406 It is, by definition, a random search. You're an idiot.
@@pope406 it has everything to do with the Constitution and you are a moron for thinking it doesn't. The cops don't get to be lazy and inconvenience the masses in order to catch a few
@@pope406 Go check my comment on frank a donaldson's post, to show you aren't wrong
i bet you learned that at trump university school of law taught by professor stu pid
He wasn't rude. Used his rights. And the situation ended properly.
Could things have gone faster if he answered, sure. But can't he check how the cops behave when a person uses their rights at the same time they do their checkpoint?
The argument that "if you don't have anything to hide, why hide things" is stupid. Your rights are yours to exercise as is, your privacy is your responsibility to try to maintain.
He was a prick
Well Josh, lets just hope the day comes when cops take ass holes like you into the woods and solve all your problems.
i think the real lesson here is why do so many leo's push to subvert you from the rights they themselves also have and knowingly,for profit attempt to deny you of.there are millions more citizens than cops and if things ever went sideways id not want millions of citizens against me.
@belelusat Yup. Kinda like a saying from Ben Franklin: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.🤔😜
And NEVER fly your kite in a thunderstorm!
The number of people thinking the biker is in the wrong is astounding and a fine illustration of the state of our nation, and the problem with democracy.
Your problem we are not a democracy
We need to outlaw dui checkpoints. They are just an excuse to violate 4a. Outlaw booze if you are so concerned with safety. Oh thats right, anything to make money.
@@markmurphy137 Read my message again.
@@navigator1372 Yep.
indoctrination centers aka public schools have failed our youth.
“I can detain you for an hour. Just answer yes or no.” What a fucking joke.
They can only detain him for 20-30 seconds, whether he answers questions or not. The police were breaking the law here, not the motorist.
@@mofumofutenngoku Absolutely. They violated his civil rights and should be prosecuted. Let's hope they at least got some administrative discipline, whatever that is.
Your response if being detained at a traffic while always recording the incident is :
"My dear officer if you violate my Rights under U.C.C 1-308, then you are in agreement in forfeiting your government Indemnification Surety Bond and will also be personally liable under Civil and Criminal charges."
You're the joke.
@@Jz-sv1ju UCC has NO bearing on a traffic stop or a DWI checkpoint. You're making up nonsense just like the Sov Cits do.
The worst thing about this video is reading all comments of people telling you to give up your rights in order to "keep others safe." Hope you're doing well.
These are your peers when the state is assembling a jury of your peers.
@@2strokeYardSale America the ignorantly blissful people of Earth.
We deserve everything coming to us because we do nothing to stop any of it.
Well in Most of the world They do theese DUI stops, But all you are asked to do is blow in the Breathalyser. If that is fine you leave. No asking your name ID licence even... not before you fail your test.
Like wearing a worthless mask or taking a rushed "vaccine"
@@vincentkingsdale8334 - yes, it's the common theme: violating your rights for the safety of others.
This is exactly how to handle this type of stop. A citizen has a right not to answer questions. The police know this very well. They had no indication he was impaired and cannot simply demand answers. The driver was polite but firm. He asked if they ordered him and then complied. The reason to ask if it is an order is that later their commands can be challenged in court if arrested. The conduct of the police may not be legal but don’t fight it at the side of the road. He did very well and remained polite at all times.
Well said.
Exactly. The side of the rode is not the place to argue. Always clarify if it is a command and frequently ask if I'm free to go. This shows you are willing to cooperate with lawful commands but do not wish to be there.
He handed over ID so in his complaint, he can tell them he did so "under duress" so it looks bad for them. There are smart ways to handle these situations and really stupid ways and this guy did a great job at doing it the right way.
The whole reason they ask a question is to either entrap you or to put you at ease for the entrapping question. When it comes to cops every question is a finely crafted loaded question. That they have practiced a hundred times before. To all who say just answer it. The jails are full of people who thought the samething.
Exactly. They're trained to rake in fines, not to protect. They're misprioritized
@@ryanconnolly1950 bro stfu your and uneducated fuck who believes is faries and unicors. Your a fucking idiot if you actually believe that. Step out of that stupid little head of yours and do some actual fucking research on polices, because most police would probably stop a bullet for your cop hating ass.
@@codymunro5709 love how you're calling someone uneducated and meanwhile you can barely spell basic words 🤣
Isn't that the truth and they're more crooked than the people they arrest
They are taught to lie, and parents know when you let someone continue to lie, they start to believe there own lies. Need to change officer code of conduct
I thought checkpoints were unconstitutional? They violate unlawful detainment.
Michigan v. Sitz 1990
SFST are voluntary and would highly recommend you take advantage of that and DECLINE the SFST
Not unconstitutional. You have the right to not answer any questions. As long as you haven’t been drinking alcohol. They ask if you’ve had anything to drink. Of course he has. Water, juice, soda or milk.
@@fivegeeztv998 the 2022 troopers Regulation Manual ,States troopers are to ask citizens" divided attention questions" to get those impaired driver's.. So trooper could ask a 80 year a question about her car door locks and the lady wouldn't answer fast enough so trooper would feel that was a CLUE that 80 year old might be impaired and would ask her to step out of the car to do SFST. NEVER talk to cops and don't do silly voluntary SFST for cops I thought each State decided if they would allow DUI checkpoints?
@@fivegeeztv998 >You have the right to not answer any questions. As long as you haven’t been drinking alcohol.
No. There are no exceptions to this right at a roadblock or any cop encounter.
Look at how many cops are just standing around with their hands in their pockets for their 150 to 200 grand a year while everybody, else is out Busting they nuts paying them
The average police salary is 54,000$ a year… not 150,000$ it was a simple google search to find that info. Lol
@@dennisreelie1720 that might be starting salary. Plenty of those guys standing around look like they got 1015 years on the job don’t believe everything from google simply.
your right that is their starting salary but again a quick google search would have told you that their average salary is $63,457 not 150k@@ericbassett6389
and next that police dept will want a budget increase to hire more cops🤣🤣🤣
The problem is, ANYTHING you say CAN and WILL be used against you. The cops are not there to clear you, they are there to charge you. Read it and weep: ANY....THING.
What a pile of meaningless garbage. In my entire lifetime I have followed the rule of being polite, respectful and cooperative with the police.
I have NEVER had a problem, but then again I have never had anything in my car that would cause a problem.
On the few occasions I have been stopped, it has been for something like speeding and the best thing to do is to ADMIT IT, any arguing gets you NOWHERE. don’t forget that you are not the only JERK that police officers have to deal with.
I can only imagine my own attitude if I had to deal with smart mouthed idiots like you EVERY day.
Police officers are only human and not saints, treating them with respect and being HONEST IS THE SMART THING TO DO.
Maybe you are NOT VERY SMART.
@Jack cleary Nothing wrong with drunk driving, bootlicker. Maybe if bitch cops didn't treat people like shit, people would drink less?
@Jack cleary they were *looking* for chances to generate revenue. "Finding drunk drivers" is just a pretense they use.
@Jack cleary you know people who were killed by drunk drivers, and that somehow proves the effectiveness of checkpoints? That is a logical fallacy. I suspect the reason you are resorting to emotion-touching and innuendo is because you have no substantive response.
@Jack cleary also, about 1/3 of people in any population are favorably disposed to authoritarian leadership. That is why the framers were careful to try and prevent that ("A democracy ... if you can keep it." -- Franklin.)
The fact that you want to turn America into North Korea doesn't mean the rest of us should quietly conform.
Waste of taxpayer money.
The entire checkpont seems suspicious. There was no reason to make the rider stop further up. They wasted his time for no reason.
If he were just polite and answered the question he would have been in his way more quickly. He sounded like a defiant seventh grader
@@grl9917 you’re probably one of those who answers every question a piggy asks huh
They thought he was black. That's more than enough to get the guns out. Better to just shoot by sight
you have the right to remain silent - every frickin time, no matter what
Apparently, many people in this comment section fail to comprehend 4 things:
1. Us citizens have constitutional rights.
2. DUI checkpoints are unconstitutional and inefficient (in what they should do, catch drunk drivers), they're purpose is "fishing".
3. Public servants are not your friends, they're trained to make you believe they are.
4. Everything you say (even the most innocent things and simple answers) can lead to truly awful stuff.
Unfortunately people are asleep and handing over their rights for peace and security.
They don't know what a constitution is 🙄
As someone who has read many thousands of comments over many years, they aren't interesting in trading rights for security or the illusion thereof. They are interested in conformity. The nail that sticks out must be hammered down.
@@2strokeYardSale agreed
Keep up the good work.
I do the same here in Ireland 👍
Those people don’t get it and never will , they obviously were raised from birth that way, when they were born they were automatically entered into a contract to be ruled and made subservient, socialism and kissing a governments ass isn’t the way to live, only death is real and by the time they die that’s all they will have , living at the wims of another human , humans can’t control humans and honestly they should mind there own business and stay in there own country if they don’t like it🤷
And see that's where you're wrong because DUI checkpoints are constitutional but they have to follow strict guidelines
Why do so many cops get so butt-hurt when people exercise their rights?
Because they're tyrants
Why are so many cops trying to trick people into giving up their rights?
The cowards just loves to violate our fourth amendment rights and they do not understand it’s illegal to do so
"I can detain you for an hour". That's code for "If you don't allow me to violate your rights I will retaliate".
How does handing over your license determine if you have been drinking? Seems like a scam to make more money by fishing for other problems like warrants, expired tag probation ect.
OTHER PROBLEMS? Like warrants for arrest for crime the POS have committed but haven't been caught - maybe murder, rape, child molesting, etc.
Fishing for other problems (warrants) you mean like for murder, rape, child molesting?
@@lamoe4175 Google statistics. DUI checkpoints neither catch people doing DUI, nor criminals that commited some kind of "first degree felony" (that's not even the checkpoint's job, lol). They exist either to generate profit by handing out tickets, or to retaliate against people who stood for their rights previously. And that's that.
Very good point because everyone is ultra hyper vigilant about their time being wasted the only time a person should be detained is if there is an obvious probable cause all the rest of it is psychobabble
@@alexmaness4138 it gives the cop that extra few seconds to assess his sobriety.
Instead of asking, have you had anything to drink today, sir they should ask. Are you willing to incriminate yourself?
Crazy how many folks in this comment section actually think the rider is at fault.
Apparently if you ride with a helmet cam or drive with a dash cam, you are up to no good.
@@2strokeYardSale What many don't understand is a dash cam can be the only thing between you and police brutality.
yeah i know....uneducated fools
Crazy at my age over half way to 100 and never had an issue l will say as a CDL driver randoms are just that random and still haven't been tackled beaten you don't have to like it but action reaction...l think this is more of a generation issue but whatever you feel you need to do, what's the big deal no l haven't had anything to drink....okay have a nice day takes all of a few seconds out of my life! More important things or battles to fight in a lifetime.
@@jerryellis5289 and what's the big deal with not wanting to answer questions too ? Is the 5 amendment after all
So an unlawful detainment and unlawful demand for id aren't worth an incident number.
I get the feeling that certain law enforcement agencies are specifically taught how to violate Constitutional Rights.
Someone should FOIA their training material and internal memos, etc.
There's a pattern here..
Sign is incorrect. It should read POLICE STATE AHEAD.
Knowing that, why make clown with them????? Must be very idiot to do that!
Lol.
Traker, i assume that you live In some part of the world where you have no rights against the police. We do. It just gets skipped over because people are lazy and weak.
39 cops standing around. Doing nothing
18 freaking cops with nothing to do. Taxpayers getting screwed again.
did you really count them all
Honestly, catching drunk drivers is a good thing. But so is standing up for your rights. If they took a drunk or two off the road it probably saved taxpayers over the cost of an investigation into a deadly car crash. Based on when this was posted it was probably 4th of July weekend.
@@MDK2_Radio they'd probably catch more by patrolling and finding vehicles that are reasonably suspicious instead of standing around hoping one bumps into them.
" Sorry to inconvenience you" but if you dont assist me as i am trying to violate your rights by not answering questions i have no right to demand you answer like " have you been drinking," I will be a tyrant with a badge and a gun and needlessly delay the stop, and try to intimidate and harrass you until you do. That 3 striper should be ashamed of himself.
Why would you talk to someone who has the legal right to lie to you and records your words to use against you?
In the jurisdiction in which I live the statistics show that regular patrols catch DUI drivers at a rate 4x higher than check stops. What a waste of resources, 4-8 officers at one location. But we think the real reason is to slowly turn us into a "Papers, please!" society.
All we need to do to stop this is everybody exercising their right to remain silent. But it's far easier to simply comply.
Well said!
Irre papiere, bitte! SCHNELL!!!
@@heathparkhurst3011 Danke, kamerad.
Glad to see another highly intelligent comment 💯💪🏾🫡
because he has a camera rolling and the evidence
A lot of people here licking the boot. I can only assume they think that police officers are naturally good people. And most of them are! But, as the saying goes, a few bad apples spoil the bunch. Here we see a classic bad apple situation.
A man, who has literally done nothing wrong, is stopped by police. That already should not happen. The police do not have the ability to just pull you over whenever they want. They need to be able to articulate exactly why, otherwise it's an illegal stop.
Next, the officer punishes this man for not providing documents. Being secure in your papers is your 4th amendment right. The officer has no reasonable suspicion that this cyclist has committed any crime, and as such has no right to ask for an ID or driver's license.
Finally, the officer clearly does not understand the 5th amendment. Our cyclist here cannot be forced or compelled to speak to an officer. Even if he has committed a crime, even if he had performed a traffic violation, he does not need to answer or respond to the officer in any way.
This man was unlawfully detained and unlawfully searched. These police officers committed crimes. Now, sure, they probably did it for a good reason. They probably did it to make sure no drunk drivers were on the roads. But it's still a crime, and good intentions don't make good excuses for committing crimes.
@@jacksaylor1450
Care to elaborate on how I'm wrong about the 4th and 5th amendments, Jack?
If he is driving a vehicle police can legally ask for a drivers license. How can you go on such a rant and not know this? Driving a vehicle is not a right. If he is just walking down the street and a cop asks to see ID for no reason then you would have a case. The motorcyclist was an asshole but at least he knew this - you don't.
@@visearms5774
You are correct.
However, police do not have the ability to pull you over for no reason. When an officer asks you to identify during a traffic stop, they're doing so because a traffic violation is a crime. This man committed no crime, nor did he do anything that would initiate a traffic stop. As such, he should not have been stopped and detained, and they had no right to ask for his driver's license.
I'm not a sovereign citizen talking about how road pirates just stole his soul or whatever. Cool your jets, and maybe learn the law and your own rights a bit.
@@someguy4384 Funny expression - cool my jets. Surprisingly that's exactly what your mom said to me last night after she put the handcuffs on me if you know what I mean.
@@someguy4384 must be a jailhouse lawyer.
I can't believe this has a 70% thumbs down. The motorcycle driver is standing up for his right to NOT have his freedom infringed upon. The cops don't have the "BLANK CHECK" right to do a DRAGNET search & survey of the citizenry. They wanted him to raise his visor so they could smell his breath and look at his eyes. That's illegal search & survey. They didn't have probable cause or any legal reason to pull him over. He wasn't speeding, he didn't have any malfunctioning lights. Listen, people. If you give up your rights you'll get walked on by jack booted dictators at some point in a fascist / police state future. The U.S. Government in modern times - since about 1968 - hates the freedoms that the Constitution GUARANTEES us. They want martial law so they can NULLIFY the Constitution. We ARE headed in that direction. Slowly. Your rights... OUR rights... were fought for, won, and have been secured with the BLOOD and very LIVES of our ancestors. If you give up those rights, and they CAN be given up easily, they will NEVER be given back to you or your children or your grandchildren. They will have to be FOUGHT for AGAIN in order to get them back. I have been WELL educated by the teachers I have been so FORTUNATE to have had in my school. Also very educational was the fact that my father was a police officer and he "clued me in" on the fast & loose behavior of people in positions of authority.
If the constitution guarantees someone can't be seized without a warrant, how is it that this video shows agents of the state doing exactly that?
@@2strokeYardSale; because they're overstepping the boundaries of their authority and people aren't challenging them by knowing and standing up for their rights.
@@2strokeYardSale Did u not understand that this guy was agreeing with you lol🤦♂️
@@mrbruh3822 oh no he understands; he's just pointing out what an unconstitutional dystopian shithole we're allowing ourselves to be pushed into for the benefit of everyone else who would also say "but cops can't do that it's illegal"
He's using case and point
"They just did"
Cops, they're there when you don't need them and never around if you do.
You don't ever need them.
If we didn't.have cops who would come.to the scene after a crime.is committed and then never catch the criminal? If we didn't have cops who would shoot your dogs for barking at strangers in their own yard? Lol Never call the cops
@@2strokeYardSale sometimes they're useful. We don't wanna live in the purge
If this was strictly a DUI checkpoint, that's all they should be able to do. Ask a few questions to determine sobriety and citizens can refuse to answer those questions
I see no problem he exercised his right
"I told you no questions"
"You are free to go"
Says it all right there
With this presence of mind he can't be drunk ;-)
@@christianherzig1575 and with no probable cause or reason to believe he could be, it’s irrelevant
Actually you are not allowed to tell an officer when they're finished asking questions. They'll decide that. It's so stupid anyway. If you have nothing to hide then you answer the question and go on your merry way.
@@andrewgill6770 Or…if you have nothing to hide, you don’t answer any questions, and go on your merry way.
@@mikeg1378 No. If I'm the officer and you don't answer my questions, I detain you. Because again, I'll ascertain that you are hiding something.
Thank you sir. I salute your patriotism.
The point is that is doesn't matter if he says yes or no, once he answers he has already provided information that could be used to incriminate him. Maybe he just drank a soda, he says "yes", police didn't specify what kind of drink, but they can make the case they meant alcohol. Lets say he says "no", but he has a half empty water bottle with him, then he could have been lying to police, etc. Point is that innocent and guilty people have the right not to talk to police and only have to comply with lawful orders.
Okay. So how about saying "I haven't drank any alcohol today," and then gone about his day?
If we're talking about detail like this, he could have still just been on his way about this situation.
This guy is out to be a dick head and a pain in the ass, trying to get a rise out of the law enforcement. THAT'S his agenda, not to uphold the rights of us. He's intentionally being a dick head.
Hell, he rides a pussy bike so that says a lot of his personality.
@@chrischapman276 - Nope, wrong answer. Cops have an insane and inordinate amount of power and our constitutional right to silence (5th amendment) and right against unwarranted searches (4th amendment) don't give a shit about your sentimentality or feelings. Tough shit.
@@nachomanrandysauvage8257 Just came out swinging at me for no fucking reason, huh? What the fuck?
Anyway, yeah... feeling's mutual. I could have had a respectful conversation with someone like you and actually "liked" your comment until I read the entirety.
So, personally have had no problems with law. Maybe because I'm not a dick??? I don't suck corn out of their ass but I don't act like an asshole like it appears is 'THE THING TO DO' with this fucked up society we live in now.
No reason to disrespect Mr. Nacho. I showed none to your ass. Sorry I hurt your fragile feelings to become so angry. Actually, no. I'm not.
Yeah, ID proves that you have been drinking earlier that day doesn’t it.
The purpose of that question was to exercise control. Whoever asks the questions has the control. His consistent refusal to answer questions robs the cops of their control and dominance
That's a whole lot of cops standing around doing nothing
I still watch this year after year.
Respect.
If you don’t exercise your rights, you lose your rights.
Good job.
So many people on here calling the motorcyclist an asshole..
Without probable cause, these detentions are illegal. You have the right to travel unmolested. As soon as he said he didn’t answer questions, the next response should have been “you are free to go.” Because that is so foreign to the people in the comments, it’s easier to vilify the guy riding the bike. He didn’t do anything wrong.
If inspections like this get one drunk driver off the road, it may even save your life one day. No need to exercise your rights at every cost..
yea, idk.
the motorcycle guy sounds pretty cool to me. everyone should act like this, cause when they don't you get the other kind of videos on youtube where police are fucking you up for no reason.
these videos actually teach you something, unlike the others were police are drawing their guns on people and they don't know what to do.
@@Harry131aba patrol cars are shown to find many more drunk drivers than DWI stops. These are an excuse to generate money off of minor infractions. You have the right to travel unmolested.
@@Harry131aba its known as "a foot in the door" give up a little freedom today, you'll be surrendering more of them tomorrow.
It’s a DUI check point. How stupid are you people. It’s set up to keep the innocent driver’s safe and alive. He chose to drive that road now do what everyone else is doing and answer the question. It’s not like he was picked out of a crowd to be harassed. You sound like those cop hating attorneys who think they know the law. It’s idiots like that that escalate very small issues into a big deal then wonder why the cops kick the shit out of them.
I don't know why people get upset when a person decides to exercise their rights under the constitution.
The Constitution is the reason the US is a basket case. The world has moved on from your precious "Constitution" & is leaving the US behind.
@@myredute As a german, I like the US Constitution, could have helped 80 years ago…
Yeah, I agree.
Speaking for myself, I don't get upset about these kinds of things. I get a kick out of them. Then I go to the posts like these and laugh at them as well.
It's more of a laughing matter to watch some idiot waste his day, fucking around with some cops he doesn't know instead of just saying one word to move along with his day, "NO"
It makes me think this guy is just some keyboard warrior, like so many here and everywhere else with people posting their opinion then replying to them telling them "You're wrong" from thousands miles away.
It's just a joke to watch two things...
The initial video.
Then the idiots on here that say they will do the same thing but are lying their asses off when they'll end up kissing the cops ass if it happened to them
@@chrischapman276 Absolutely right Chris. I've been arguing with an idiot on here who thinks the complete opposite. Here in Australia, we'd rather get along with the police instead of confronting them but seems in the US, everyone here with low IQ, seems to think their Constitution rights will protect them. Good comment, well worth the read!
@@myredute And sir, I agree with your concept as well. There is one thing about kissing ass and looking like you are doing so. That doesn't fly with anyone anywhere. It's another to respect people you come across in life, let them do their job, not make it so anyone anywhere has a fcked up day at work and just KISS throughout life... KISS- KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.
These type on this video have entirely too much time on their hands to WANT to do this shit.
Then there are the keyboard warriors in life we all come across. Those that are still living at home, sitting in their underwear at 2PM but are also some WWF fighter that is going to hunt someone down and punch them in the dirt for having an opinion on these responses as well. Those one's are the one's I' LOVE to argue with... the TOUGH GUY... that has a small ..... very small.... amount of self security that love these vids!!!
Before you get angry just know that this checkpoint is not designed to stop drunk drivers, it's a revenue source.
That is supposed to reduce my anger?
"Oh, you're only doing this for money? Well alrighty then, carry on."
@@clacksonjemens 💯
So many men showing they are not responsible when given power over others, ego seems to be more important than freedom.
They say, “If you have nothing to hide you should have nothing to fear. Why should you care?” They don’t think about the origin of that quote, which is a piece of Nazi propaganda from Joseph Goebbles. Privacy is the foundation of all other rights. Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech, because you have nothing to say.
It would behoove us all to be weary of the phrase, “the innocent have nothing to fear.” For the innocent have everything to fear, an mostly from the guilty. But in the long term even more from those who say things like, “the innocent have nothing to fear.”
@celal t Normal has become very weak.
To all the people saying things like "just give them what they want"/"it would have been over in much less time if he would have just answered the questions"/"this is escalating the situation unnecessarily"
Ever heard of the 4th amendment? Unwarranted searches and seizures. Yes, these cops were doing checks. No, the checks were not constitutional.
If you don't exercise your rights, they become seen as obsolete.
DUI checkpoint is legal and can prevent accidents. I ride a motorcycle and have been hit by a fucking drunk driver . You can go fuck yourself.
@@chopperchopster it is obvious that you don't see my point. The main problem with telling someone off at first contact is that they will be less likely to listen.
We can definitely talk, if you like. Also, please don't be a troll/rude.
@Debbie Hellion sorry for your loss, but Anon Y Moose absolutely has a say and it’s 100% equal to yours. Your grief doesn’t give you righteousness over him. Sadly DUI checkpoints haven’t made much impact on the incidence of DUI’s so it’s far from certain your daughter’s killer would have been taken off the road. Again, I am sorry for your loss.
@Debbie Hellion I never said they weren't.That wasn't the point. (Not that legal is a measure of whether something's right or wrong.) BTW, mourning or not, your silly outburst on my channel is a measure of your character.
@Debbie Hellion After your second immature post, I'm pretty sure you're lying about losing anyone to a DUI. Shame on you.
I don't really get all the negative comments. Courts all across the country have determined that police checkpoints are unconstitutional and violate the 4th Amendment. I applaud this young man for exercising his rights. What is really sad is that so many Americans are happy to give up their rights and bend over for the Police.
well spoken !.
They like taking it up the arse there brainwashed already no hope for them
I’m sorry English is my second language but what do you mean by BEND OVER? should I be worried? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
My parents were almost killed by being hit by a drunk driver. America has a serious drinking and driving problem. However, I also don’t believe in checkpoints either as this runs constitutionally thin on people being able to freely travel without probable cause being utilized justly (no weaving, slow/fast driving, no impairment shown, etc).
I truly think officer resources are better used looking for drunks where they are usually found and displaying bad behavior. All DUI checkpoints do is waste people’s time, gets them upset and makes departments look bad in the public eye. I appreciate what all law enforcement do to protect the public but DUI checkpoints are not a wise idea for the public good. It comes across as a fascist style of law enforcement.
He didn't commit any crimes and he doesn't need to answer any questions. Allowing this sets the precedent for future checkpoints for like firearm checks or just extra govt bullcrap.
Stop talking your against a DUI Checkpoint that could benefit your community you damn karen go cry somewhere else we have too many dumb ass people in this world
I feel the same way about wearing masks in public. I never do it. And I make sure everybody sees me never wearing a mask
@@unitedstatesofamerica6592 I mean is it really effective if they just ask you you say no then they let you pass?
@@DemonTime08 it’s affective of finding criminals and convicts common sense dont be a karen just because you got stopped
@@unitedstatesofamerica6592 obviously you didn’t learn proper grammar.......so you’re tyrannical and dumb
It’s always funny when they get challenged and get all flustered and have no idea what to say or do 😂
They are programmed what to say. When a driver like this does things outside their “training” then it shows they don’t know the law. They are cleverly trying to get motorists to provide information they are not required to give. Every traffic stop is an opportunity for escalation into a DUI or narcotics arrest, a suspended license, expired registration or no insurance enforcement action and revenue enhancement.
Unless it’s a black man
Go ahead, make my day is what I expect.
@@cyanide8513 am I wrong?
@@KibouJ 100% wrong.
Ex cop now lawyer: NEVER TALK TO COPS!! Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law, BUT IT WILL NEVER BE USED TO HELP YOU!!
Traitor
Facts
You are awesome man! This is how the system should work.
Yeah these stops should not be legal in any shape or form.
Thanking this guy for exercising his rights. The only way we preserve our rights is by people using them. Thank you
Fr the bootlickers just love getting tramped on
The Police are trying to keep drunks off the road idiot
Why don't they just setup a sign that says "crime check point: if you have broken any law please pull yourself over so we can ticket/arrest you" . This is a waste of time, money and resources.
Only a waste if you support criminals.
OK, I am from a different country so perhaps I can offer my opinion and add some objectivity, take it or leave it. Firstly ...and I think it is important to think about it this way. The motorcycle driver was not DUI and did nothing wrong. He was in fact respectful and did everything the policemen demanded he do. The US has laws that ensure the rights of the individual. Not so where I live. For those that criticize the motorcycle driver too much, he is actually helping ensure that those rights are maintained. Legally he does not have to give more information than he was giving. Don't be too quick to hand over your 4th Amendment rights, otherwise why even have rights? The last officer, the sargent, the guy with the hat, was also very respectful to the driver, and knowledgeable about the law. He was calm had no attitude. He handled the whole situation very well.
"Those who would trade their freedom for security deserve neither." Ben Franklin
Perfect quote
That was back when most people where able to protect them selves, our government soften us up for a reason
He owned slaves lol
If he lived in todays world he would probably have a different point of view.
@@allenleanhart5503 Oh no a gun freak, this country has 45% of the worlds guns and we are about the most dangerous nation to live in.
Yes, guns are so useful at making us UNSAFE.
A DUI checkpoint at 2:00 in the afternoon on a country road? What the hell is going on in this county?
Because it's not really about catching drunk drivers
@@bewickizer2457 yeah.
like 20 cops just standing around fishing for ticketable infractions.
Of course! Then they run your ID in the system & hope that they catch something. They have no thing better to do with taxpayers commerce.
@@teddygee7859, if you think you can do better, why not become a cop and show them how it’s done? I’ll bet they’ll welcome you with open arms!
It was 4th of July weekend (check the upload date) so I'm glad they had such a checkpoint. But this guy handled himself and stood up for his rights well. And the cops were able to see he was sober so in a way it was a win-win.
@@sf7708 I think I know Teddy. I'm pretty sure he is a cop 🤔
Its called doing your job. Get one guy..
Unbelievable how much money we got standing around at this stop
Until a drunk driver kills someone
@@wesleybrown6974 "those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety"
@@wesleybrown6974 in the middle of the day this is not to catch drunk drivers 😂😂 but a boot eater like you doesn't question the law. Do you know why they didn't want run his lincese after he asked for an incident number?
@@angelmedina2762 Unlawful stop and he's got all the video.
I wonder how much money the state made vs. their pay that day
all the people in the comments saying why not answer the police officer. Well, if you answer questions they will use what you say against you and possibly interpret what you said as admission of guilt or waving of your constitutional rights. They cannot detain you for longer than reasonably required to conduct an investigation. They will ask you questions to get you to wave your rights and basically offer up evidence against yourself. I would be much more polite than this fellow but hey he has the right to act that way. The police are NEVER your friend.
And if you've done nothing wrong, why be such an ass? "Nope, nothing to drink officer." and you're on your way. I guess trumptards just have to be right, especially when they're not.
@@kahnadah you're obviously not understanding.... can you say rights
@@kahnadah he wasn’t being an ass. 😂
Only if he's drunk dude. How can it be used against him after he passes a DUI Inspection?
Same people that say this same ones shitting there pants when an intruder is in there home and call the police as they are hiding in the closet
The rider is under no obligation to help the officers with their investigation, and he doesn’t have to answer any questions. If it were me, I’d give them my license and registration (this is not a traffic stop, i.e. the rider is not suspected of any violation, so that may not be required), and that would be IT.
There was no investigation. There was no suspicion of a crime.
@@2strokeYardSale My favorite part was when at 2:25 the guy said "Why is that?" and you just stared at him like, "Bruh, that's ANOTHER question."
@@yankee2yankee216 just let those that are giving cops a bad time have a break in at their home and they scream the loudest about justice in their favor,but don't want to grease the wheels for traffic stops to go smoothly,you can't have it your way all the time cause you ain't at Burger King.
@@2strokeYardSale If I ask them if I’m detained, if not, I will leave immediately. If I am, they’d better have a legitimate justification. If not, I’ll argue that I should be free to go, I don’t have to help with your investigation, etc., but it all depends… If I have a case, I might very likely sue!
@@barneyvinyard3740 We have an absolute right, when guns or any threat to life is involved, to expect cops to get it right, every single time. Any deviation from perfect, if it involves harm to an innocent person, or unnecessary harm to anybody, should be treated as a crime.
Right to travel freely without being harassed through illegal stops searches and seizures
Rights are likes muscles, if you don't exercise them, you'll eventually lose them.
Exactly, fuck these cowards. What did they do in the Uvalde school shooting?
I think the point of this video was to show us how to ruin the clutch on a motorcycle.
Ha, ha... thats a good one. I fell for the constitutional issues everyone is talking about when in fact it really was a how NOT to operate a motorcycle!
Violation of 4th Amendment.
That's a lot of tax payer funded standing around.
Must be a Union job. Lol
@@stevenbuckley4433 no they despise those remember?
It’s offset by the ticket and dui revenue
The usual
Hey you gotta put on a show if you want the public to think you’re legit. Lot of Doughnuts and coffee gathering.
Why not let cops go further check your pockets, car, house, search history, bank accounts. Hey, it may save lives.
All lives matter
@Karla Aguilar since you put it so eloquently, I change my stance.
Exactly, after all “ it’s for public safety” or “ it’s all about the children”. That way the children can grow up in a world with no rights because we gave them away to protect them.
@@gelato3299 how about the cows, chickens, and pigs you have and will be eating?
They pulling granny's over giving traffic citations. But we're suppose to trust them. LOL
The amount of bootlicker comments on this is amazing. I'm astounded how eager some people are to give up their rights.
Conservatives love snarky nicknames. There's a reason why the cops are doing this. Just answer the question. It's for everyone's safety.
@@joeshithragman3264 for everyone's money
@@joeshithragman3264 my refusal to answer a c.o.p.'s questions has ZERO affect on anyone's "safety" ,,, fuck your safety my liberty and freedoms are MORE important to me !!!
@@joeshithragman3264 damn youre really making this about political ideologies? when you surrender your rights for no reason you get closer and closer to having a knee on your neck when you did nothing wrong
What rights were violated you loser
Actions like this prove, They don't work for you.
What everyone is missing, is that the ruling in Miranda v Arizona was that the police must advise you that you do not have to answer questions, before they start asking any questions! So any questions at a DUI check point, must be prefixed by a warning that any thing you say may be used against you, before asking you if you have had a drink!
The Court held that “there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves.” As such, “the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
Moreover in Robbins v City of Des Moines, the Justices ruled that a detainment is a arrest, if you are unable to freely leave!
There is a misunderstanding by the Cops that this only applies to a person who has been arrested for criminal offence, that is not true!
Way to distort Miranda. The ONLY TIME Miranda applies, is if you are told that you are being placed under arrest. You’re like a jailhouse lawyer aren’t you? You googled Miranda v. Arizona, clicked the Wikipedia hit & regurgitated what was there. Nice job. Smdh
And the caveat of being ‘being deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way’ goes away with ‘probable cause’.
If you are stopped at a LEGALLY ORCHESTRATED DWI CHECKPOINT, and refuse to cooperate, that in and of itself MAY give LEO’s probable cause. And if you’re acting like a douche nozzle, expect probable cause to be a part of your life in the immediate future.
@@Willie_McBride You just described how they make the illegal legal by being corrupt and acted like its a good thing. Refusing to allow someone to violate my rights isn't enough of suspicion for a crime, if it was then this wouldn't be the USA it'd be Soviet Russia
@@johnsimth6587 Randomized DWI Checkpoints hold up in court all the damned time. Just stop with the whole ‘Every cop is out to violate my civil rights, so I’m just not gonna cooperate with them ever’. Maybe that checkpoint is gonna nab the drunk behind the wheel who might go flying down the highway, blow a red light & T-Bone a car with your wife & kids in it. You’ll be the one screaming WHY WAS THAT DRUNK ON THE ROAD?!?
C’mon man, don’t be ‘that guy’. If you’re not drunk, then a few questions and 60 seconds of your time aren’t a violation of your rights, or even a minor inconvenience. And if you are drunk, those same few questions, & that same 60 seconds may be what just saved somebody’s life.
The cop asked the U.S citizen if he had anything to drink today. The biker should ask the cop if he brushed his teeth today and showered. Stopping anybody who has not broken the law is illegal. Cops are law enforcement officers and can only enforce the laws. If you did not break a law then the cops can not detain you and interrogate you.
Oh i hope they will continue,its to late to stop a drunk idiot after he have killed a family
@@haraldgunnes2127 Instead of patrolling the roads and keeping a look out for dangerous drunken drivers, the cops set up a blockade while the dangerous drunk drivers are free to drive around as long as they don't go through the check point where all the cops are stationary at.
@@tomthumb5860 What about the ones that are arrested at these checkpoints isn’t that a good thing? Or should we let them drive
And if he did ask the officer if he had brushed his teeth and showered, and the officer replied yes, would this guy have then answered the officer's question? You know he wouldn't have. This guy is just a trouble maker. I was raised to be polite and get along with my peers. Probably the difference of being brought up as a farm girl versus city kids. We appreciate our neighbors and respect our elders, our ministers, and our civil servants.
@@dawnpeterson1269 Agreed. But when bad cops are out to harass the public to fill thier quotas to bring in revenue for the city then the people need to stand up for thier rights. Government is run by corrupt, greedy politicians who would sell thier own mother if they could get a dollar out of it.
If your under the influence on a bike it usually figures it self out.
And if they stopped him b4 he ran into and killed a family member of yours I'm sure you'd be grateful
@@johnbalogna803 I have a family member who had been crippled since the 80s from drunk driver. I only ment that bikers who drink die
John bologna sleep well
The sergeant says he is sorry to inconvenience the driver. But of course he isn’t sorry. Which illustrates a characteristic of American cops: They are habitual liars and will do so even when they gain no benefit from the lie and when the lie is trivial to detect. Both apply here.
It clearly is insincere to claim to be sorry for the brief detainment when it is being repeated 100s of times an hour at this one check point.
The problem here is this is impeding a persons right to travel. This an attempt at extortion through force.
so let everyone drive drunk and kill innocent people?
@@jjayregal It happens everyday with checkpoints happening.
a person has every right to travel ,.but not if your drinking and driving,..would you want a drunk on the same road your wife or girlfriend is on,,.or kids,....thats the question they are asking plain and simple
@Bob Hoffman maybe. good thing for checkpoints though right
The right to travel and operating a motor vehicle are not the same thing. There are laws and regulations regarding vehicles that everyone has to follow. If they see someone with an expired tag, license, or insurance then their privilege to operate a motor vehicle will be questioned and they'll be justly fined.
Ladies and gentleman. Submit,submit, submit. Is NOT the American way. DUI checkpoints, stops without cause, home entries and car searches without cause are the reason the citizenry’s’ trust and friendship of law enforcement is waning. Fishing expedition law enforcement does more harm than good. Please get back to intervening in crimes not strong arming the general population.... one mans opinion.
Mhm..think that, see you in jail.
Good job. We have the right to travel freely without being questioned or stopped unless we violate the law.
Hey idiot they are there to protect innocent people from drunk drivers duuuhhhh🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@karensmith1685
Hey idiot... you don't fkn say??
Hence, he said UNLESS we violate the law. Meaning they should target impaired drivers who they suspect of dui not anybody they feel like in an attempt to incriminate people.
Do you get detained for the purpose of investigation of any other crime.. e.g. assault, robbery, murder????
No! Only if they can demonstrate reasonable articulable suspicion can they detain you or stop you from going about your private affairs.
That's the fkn point, idiot! 🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@freak1sees714 hey moron ITS A CHECK POINT THEY DONT KNOW WHOS IMPAIRED UNTIL THEY STOP THEM ALSO WHATS WRONG WITH PROVIDING AN ID UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE GEEEZ STUPID PEOPLE NEED NOT COMMENT
@@karensmith1685
SMFH....!!!! Do you get stopped and investigated for any other random crime?? Have you ever gone through a burglar checkpoint??
Have you ever been randomly stopped and quizzed about committing any murders lately??
Have you ever bothered to research and learn what the law is? What jurisdiction do cops have? What your inalienable rights are? What the difference between law and legal is? What legalese is? What the difference between laws, legalization, statutes, regulations is?
Do you know what freedom of movement means? Do you know what the definition of 'person' 'vehicle' 'driving' 'passenger' 'road' in court is??
Didn't think so.. just another @ssh0le with a big mouth and no fkn clue... what was it you said... stupid people need not comment?
Ironically ironic ey.... you absolute muppet!!
@@karensmith1685
Ohh and to answer your idiotic question...
1. Because THE LAW says I don't have to. Supreme court ruling.
2. Because I HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG.
3. It violates my constitutional right to have freedom of movement without hindrance or harrassment.
You know, the constitution that the cops took an oath to uphold..
4. Until I break the law, THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION.
6. I've represented myself 3 times in court and won every time. Because I'm not stupid enough to get on a public forum and think Im right and I know what I'm talking about without having done my due diligence. I dont want to look and sound utterly stupid. Something you have no shame in doing.
5. Idjiots who don't bother researching the law and think their opinion has any value should get a mental health assessment done as they're suffering from a borderline personality disorder and or narcissism. That's you.
Anything else you want to add genius?
Most people don't understand this. You DO NOT HAVE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. Your Miranda rights state, "ANYTHING YOU SAY, CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU IN A COURT OF LAW"
This is how you use the law against them. "I DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS"
Interesting how people condemn YOU for folllowing the law.
Well done for knowing your rights and excercising them. Perfect example of how to deal with police. Remain calm and respectful at all times.
this is purely a person acting like a child and not doing as he is told
@@MrLisa35 doing as your told is acting like a child. Being an adult means you have independent thought and choice of your actions. Do you always do as your told?
He compiled and gave all his information lol just made it difficult. Thats pretty childish.
@@christislord6136 shouldn’t bear false witness. He never said if he had a drink or not.
@@MDK2_Radio didn't lie lol he gave his ID and registration. Which he could have done in the line and been through much faster.
Cop: “I didn’t pull you over”
Video: you literally ordered him to pull over.
Charles, your picture looks like that fat slob Michael Moore, and you sound twice as stupid as he is.
Young man I respectfully admire you……you handled yourself well………❤
You are so right to push back against these stops. We introduced Random Breath Testing in Australia decades ago. At first they set up stops like in this video. They still do but since then the program has been renamed Roadside Breath Testing and was expanded so you could be pulled over at any time for no reason to be tested. Then drug testing was added. This was sold to the public on the basis that it was random. That's a distant memory, now it is targeted and arbitrary.
Driving down the road and a policeman doesn't like the look of your car? He can pull you over and test you.
Pass the breath test? He can drug test you.
Refuse either test? You get arrested and charged.
He feels like searching your car? You have to comply - no such thing as probable cause protection here
The government and police get away with it here because citizens have no rights & people are compliant. You are fortunate to have the rights that you do. Exercise them and stop this before it gets worse.
#Australia is a prison country from border to border you're in the hands of the Gestapo. ☠️
In light of what's happened in Australia recently, I'd say your due for a revolution and your own bill of rights.
If your not driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or have drugs or anything else that may harm someone in your car what’s the big deal - sounds like people think they have the right to just drive around high on booze and drugs I’m happy for police to take that right away from them - to many tragedies on our roads a traffic stop is small inconvenience to make our roads safer
@@jettstap You completely missed the point of my post. No one thinks they have the right to break laws. That's a ridiculous straw man. My point, again, is that a "small inconvenience" that was being randomly applied has grown into targeted harassment just because a police officer doesn't like the look of you or your car. To be clear, I have a clean driving record, never drink and drive, have never used an illicit drug, have a bland car that attracts no attention and have never been pulled over for harassment. Even though this has never happened to me I still think it's wrong.
If you're weaving over the road then fine, there's a reason for the police to be suspicious and they should be able to pull you over and test you. It's the principle that you should be free to go about your business unless there's a specific reason for the police to intervene.
To take your argument. Drugs cause death and misery to our communities. Should police be able to enter your home and search it to see if you're a drug dealer? If you're not dealing drugs what’s the big deal - sounds like people think they have the right to just break the law and be drug dealers.
It boggles my mind how people focus on the fact that something only takes a few minutes & is only a minor inconvenience while they completely ignore the much more important principle behind what's being done. By that argument you should be happy for the police to stop you in the street and demand your identity papers because it only takes a few minutes. It would keep us safe because who knows, you might be a wanted criminal.
The notion that you are happy to hand over freedom in return for safety is common but terribly flawed. If the last 2 years have taught us anything they've taught us that this is a bargain with the devil.
The Australian government has completely butchered its people and the people allowed to happen. First they took all your guns away and now your rights continue to disappear.
Ashe leaves, the cops are like what the f was that?..they have no idea. Remember..it takes 2 years of training to become a barber, 3 months to become a police officer.
No, it takes 1 week to be a cop. So easy.
@@devladjackson116 I hate cops and even I know it is 6-12 weeks.
For every person that ever says if you have nothing to hide it or haven’t done anything wrong. Just answer
You’re an embarrassment and need to learn your Rights
I hate it when people say that. Some people froth on being governed I can't comprehend it I want to shoot my mil when she says it.
They only say that when it doesnt affect them, but when it does, they think differently. That's when it too late. Wake up people.
Yeah, these people are fucking pathetic.
Not your job to teach them.
A convicted felon with a camera
"Have you had anything to drink today, sir?" What kind of stupid, pointless question is that? Everyone is going to say no, regardless.
>Everyone is going to say no
Here we have audio and video of a person who didn't say no.
for everyone saying he is doing this just to be an ass. first of most states have deemed these DUI checkpoints unconstitutional, as they are. if you know any of your rights as you should, you would know that you do not have to answer any questions for the police (5th amendment). all citizens should do this even if completely innocent 1 to protect themselves from planted evidence (pretty rare but not null) 2 to keep the public servants in check and to remind them they are not above the law or the constitution or our rights as the people of the united states and 3 so that you don't accidently confess or potentially mis speak and now all the sudden you are being searched.
Exactly. Don’t have to answer any questions.
Right in the middle of the day? Looks like a fund raiser to me.
There's plenty of morning drinkers out there. google the police chief that got a DUI at 10am. It happens at all hours.
@@worlds_okayest_pilot bud I don't live under a rock. Check points should be at night when the bars are popping. During the day is a hey let's all pow wow on the highway and write tickets, then all get off and have some drinks.
Revenue generators
More money 💰 needed
Revenue generation stop
Are they expecting someone who has been drinking to admit it?
Apparently you can tell if someone is drunk by looking at their driver’s license.
Nope. They usually lie but when someone is inebriated from alcohol their will be physical indicators present.
Alcohol has a strong odor, the person may slur their words or their eyes will appear glassy.
The person may also have a difficult time keeping their balance or following basic instructions.
He answers no questions because a citizen is not required to assist an officer with his investigation into himself.
This dui checkpoint is just an excuse to search you and your vehicles.
You legally don't have to answer any questions. I think he is just trying to prove a point. He obviously isn't drunk.
We all have duties, LEO’s must swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Citizens are who the Constitution was written to protect. Disrespecting citizens Rights is failure to uphold the oath.
It’s serious for reasons, one is called respect, it’s a two way street…
Well done. You were polite but asserted your right not to answer questions.
But why make it difficult. Sure, you have a right to remain silent, but doing so just makes you a dick. The guy probably has a family and he is just trying to do his job. I don't condone your ability to waste time, and I don't think what you did was impressive.
If cops could get the heck out of the road and leave people alone that would be great.
Mark Sky the Off-Grid RV Guy you must be an idiot too.
@@DRG3824 Just enjoy freedom more than unnecessary cops who want to scam people for money. The police state in this country is out of control. Did the guy seem drunk and falling over? No, so they should get out of the way and stop reaching for any excuse to impose on people's privacy and freedom. They don't care about people, they will act like your best friend to get answers out of you then use it against you. It's just what they're trained to do, to be decietful towards hard working Americans and then toss them in the slammer like trash and suck the cash out.
@@LawnWrangler323 if you haven't committed a crime then what answers would they get out of you, unless you have in fact committed a crime? And cops don't make commission for arresting ppl, traffic stops, etc. So of your incisting that cops try to arrest everyone they can because they get more money from it then your mistaken, because they don't. Cops get the same pay check whether they arrest 1 person, or 100 people for the pay period lol.
The rider is awesome from exercising his rights.
A random check of "your papers.' Sounds like a forth amendment violation.
Not so random. Did you see them checking zee papers of other motorists? No, just the one who declined to answer questions.
Any competent Peace Officer, and even fake police (Policy Enforcers) can tell by the riders demeanor that he was in his right mind. No one is obligated to assist the police to incriminate yourself.
If there is no injured party, there is no crime. And as above, it was blatantly obvious that he was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
Well handled young man. You are simply exercising your rights at Common Law!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ridiculous
Bot bot bot botbera Ann botbera Ann
"The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion." U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005)
All checkpoints are unconstitutional
@f15stroke the Supreme Court ruled that exception on checkpoints are allowed only when the a police agency let the public know 30 days prior to setting a checkpoint
@@natedowns5 Still unconstitutional
The SCOTUS ruled no such thing in Michigan v. Sitz 1990 or other "checkpoint" cases.
@@2strokeYardSale Are you addressing me? I did not mention Sitz here.
Man BOOTLICKERS ABOUND IN HERE!!!
Imagine what kind of person thinks "Papers, Citizen!" is acceptable behavior.
Well, considering the SCOTUS has rules that random check points are perfectly legal it would seem that the courts and our elected officials generally agree it is acceptable behavior.
@@TwilightxKnight13you sound like a harris voter