When carried by a supersonic aircraft, "Bunker Busters" can be accelerated to mach 2.5 or more when the aircraft executes a dive-bombing from 15,000 meters. This adds tremendously to the penetration.
Yes, not only one! Certainly one witch is recognizable for every one and will not be the main entrance! The bunker builders aren't stupid either, or are they? 😂
Yes, a heavy Thermobaric right down the entrance and down the air shafts. Turn them into Golems. If they can’t breath they can’t fight. I was preaching this ten years ago.
We can use a second or third bunker buster to follow up after the first one or two. Each time penetrating even deeper before arriving at the underground nuclear facilities in Iran. There's no rule that says that we can only launch one per target.
Just FYI, if this video is showing the munitions that we have, you know that there are even more destructive weapons in our arsenal. We never show our whole hand. And right there at 8:13 it confirms what I said about using more than one buster for a deep penetration, such as the Iranian nuclear facilities.
Negative. RNEP was canceled, so we don't have that capability but it turns out we never will because after Fogbank was changed, none of our physics packages can handle the shock of an EP weapon. D'oh!
Bunker buster USELESS garbage. Can be easily and readily defeated. Dig a very deep "hole/tunnel/bunker" and have the sides just sufficiently strong enough to hold off sand/earth... and make the floor(s)/ceiling(s) simply strong enough to support people and needed resources so when a "bunker buster" comes sailing in it is met with no/hardly any resistance and keeps going and going and as it goes through each floor/ceiling the sides collapse and the "bunker buster" gets buried and explodes down deep and away from any vital things. Meanwhile the floors where the people are remain intact.
Next do a video about new concrete technologies that are designed to thwart bunker buster bombs, such as, reinforced concrete that's impregnated with high tensile strength metal and carbon fibre composites.
Bunker buster USELESS garbage. Can be easily and readily defeated. Dig a very deep "hole/tunnel/bunker" and have the sides just sufficiently strong enough to hold off sand/earth... and make the floor(s)/ceiling(s) simply strong enough to support people and needed resources so when a "bunker buster" comes sailing in it is met with no/hardly any resistance and keeps going and going and as it goes through each floor/ceiling the sides collapse and the "bunker buster" gets buried and explodes down deep and away from any vital things. Meanwhile the floors where the people are remain intact.
"this bunker buster bomb" (shows sixteen different weapons) Airblast weapons are not EP weapons. Airblast weapons are not "bunker buster" weapons. "Bunker buster" weapons are Earth Penetrating.
The script that "narrator" folows just wasn't reviewed for factual information and repetition. "SPOTLIGHT" is operating on a low budget and believes that the average viewer is not that bright.
Imagine "what if" the US had bunker busters during WWII for places like Peleliu and Iwo Jima. There would have been a lot less American blood shed as a result. Japanese losses would have been about the same given Japan's proclivities at the time of fighting to the death anyway.
There’s always targets that are deep enough or hardened enough to be bomb proof. If well designed and deep enough you can even withstand nukes. It’s just a case of whether it’s worth the immense cost of having facilities that complex.
Jesus didn't recommend missiles, or even a sword. He won the battle by love, doing good, being upricht and honoring God. I cannot imagine how so much good comes from so much 'weakness'. He indeed is the Ruler of the kings, but doesn't make use of earthly weapons. Let us 'survey the wondrous cross'.
يمكن أبطال هكذا نوع من القنابل بأن يتم وضع فوق اسطح المباني أحواض تحتوي على كمية من المواد عالية اللزوجة مثل الزفت وبتالي تعيق حركة هذا النوع من القنابل
Il existe une certaine couche en composites étendue sur tout le périmètre en dessous duquel se trouve le bunker qui empêche le missile de pénétrer le sol et de le faire exploser à la surface ...
I mean why do bunker engineers not simply build bunkers deep enough so that no bunker busters can penetrate them? Just build them 100 m deep, problem solved
The GPU-57 bomb, designed for penetrating hardened targets, has impressive capabilities, but penetrating a bunker with 100 meters of hardened steel and 300 meters of concrete, even at a depth of 500 meters, is still an extremely challenging scenario. 1. Material Thickness: The combined thickness of 400 meters (100m of hardened steel and 300m of concrete) far exceeds the penetration capabilities of most conventional munitions. While the GPU-57 is designed to penetrate reinforced structures, such extreme thicknesses would likely be beyond its effective range. 2. Depth: At a depth of 500 meters, the additional pressure from the surrounding earth enhances the structural integrity of the bunker. This further complicates penetration efforts, as the bomb would not only have to penetrate the materials but also overcome the pressure and compression effects of the surrounding rock and earth. 3. Penetration Technology: While the GPU-57 incorporates advanced technology for penetration, including a hard steel casing and a specialized warhead, it is primarily designed for use against more conventional defensive structures. Penetrating hundreds of meters of reinforced materials would likely require specialized munitions that are explicitly designed for extreme hard-target defeat, which may not exist in current arsenals. In conclusion, it is highly unlikely that a GPU-57 bomb could successfully penetrate a bunker reinforced to the specifications you've provided, both in terms of material thickness and depth. Such a target would require a more specialized approach or advanced munitions that can handle extreme fortifications.
This is very dangerous because in 2020 there was a guy called Povandolakoviscov Kityionshikov. Why did you skip the name, now I'm not going to finish the story.
All these I find of keen interest. The capacity to project force to negate wide-ranging physical threats outside the USA is critical to developing any society. At 6:55, whoever made the graphics on the Lockheed Martin AGM 158 JASM ER cruise missile misspelt "Lockheed"! 🙄
Well, it is just a matter of time to develop active protection for bunkers like the active protections on, for example, tanks.... WY have none developed such already??? 🤔😉
For below 100M strike maybe... beyond that... I think it's impossible! You can't even damage a thang if the bunker is a mountain fortress, deeply embedded more underground reach more than 200M down below
mine is better two reasons one it is galvanized no need for strategic metal and two MINE is threaded you know what that is a GIANT LAG that is it full stop can sell you one they go by the pound it just screws itself to whatever no directions even required
Shhhh.. Don't tell anyone.. But, we (USA - and almost certainly Israel as well) have lower yield nuclear bunker busters in the MOP format.. ala the 57..
When carried by a supersonic aircraft, "Bunker Busters" can be accelerated to mach 2.5 or more when the aircraft executes a dive-bombing from 15,000 meters. This adds tremendously to the penetration.
And to the ordnance's evasion of interdiction.
LoL - 10th grade?
@@DavidRLentz-b7i Let me guess, 10th grade lower 3rd of your class, IQ of 88?
& miss the target by miles 😂
@@ZainalAbidin-d8q WHY? It is GUIDED for every centimeter.
No matter how deep there’s always an entrance.
Yes, not only one! Certainly one witch is recognizable for every one and will not be the main entrance! The bunker builders aren't stupid either, or are they? 😂
Entrances are what the air blast weapons are for.
Yes, a heavy Thermobaric right down the entrance and down the air shafts. Turn them into Golems. If they can’t breath they can’t fight. I was preaching this ten years ago.
Like some women I know.
We can use a second or third bunker buster to follow up after the first one or two. Each time penetrating even deeper before arriving at the underground nuclear facilities in Iran. There's no rule that says that we can only launch one per target.
Just FYI, if this video is showing the munitions that we have, you know that there are even more destructive weapons in our arsenal. We never show our whole hand.
And right there at 8:13 it confirms what I said about using more than one buster for a deep penetration, such as the Iranian nuclear facilities.
It doesn't matter, what matters is the accuracy of hitting something in between the crevices of a mountain.
"IRAN" is written in big Letters on this Thing!
😂
More like Zelenshyy's bunker. He must have 5 or 6 to move around in.
ERuSSki Bot! It is not getting more true, how often you tell us TerroruSSian BS! @@tonyp2865
you mean putler.....@@tonyp2865
Thanks for the S70! Washington is very happy about it, although...they are laughing! Its complete Crap! 😆😝🤡🤡🤡🤡@@tonyp2865
including Iran's nuclear factory.
Well Biden is a pacifist if someone stops the threat it would be Israel
Or f35 bunkers....
If you can move a mountain the bunker bombs are really
I don't think so if it's in a mountain 😂
every cave has an entrance. no entrance is invulnerable if hit by the right bomb. can cause a lot of damage inside.
Nuclear Bunker busters are needed for the most advanced bunkers today.
Negative. RNEP was canceled, so we don't have that capability but it turns out we never will because after Fogbank was changed, none of our physics packages can handle the shock of an EP weapon. D'oh!
@@railgap ok expert.
Thanks for your valuable input!
Sounds like you might be at the Joint Chiefs of Staff building as you type right now!
Tungsten bunker buster are not theoretical anymore.
No matter how deep there's always an entrance.
haha
Knock, knock!
Gbu-57: Knock! Knock!
Houthi's: Who is th.....
3 in series on same spot and nothing lives below.
How deep? I remember when Bibi warned everyone that as soon as iran finished pouring concrete, their bases became almost impossible to destroy
Bunker buster USELESS garbage. Can be easily and readily defeated.
Dig a very deep "hole/tunnel/bunker" and have the sides just sufficiently strong enough to hold off sand/earth... and make the floor(s)/ceiling(s) simply strong enough to support people and needed resources so when a "bunker buster" comes sailing in it is met with no/hardly any resistance and keeps going and going and as it goes through each floor/ceiling the sides collapse and the "bunker buster" gets buried and explodes down deep and away from any vital things. Meanwhile the floors where the people are remain intact.
@1JO_M with no ear drums from that day on !
@@MichaelDebalski-mk6bt Another TOO easy thing to solve.
Bust through hundreds of feet of hardened concrete.
Lebanon getting a FREE remodel.
And Red Square😂
Who are you two anyway ? Do you do much more than live at home with parents and work part time in Tesco , so unaware it’s ridiculous!
@@ALMH199agreed they don't think know that Rome is falling
Great Hall of the people when in full session?
Next do a video about new concrete technologies that are designed to thwart bunker buster bombs, such as, reinforced concrete that's impregnated with high tensile strength metal and carbon fibre composites.
It all burns if the temps high enough
You can send in...one after the other....in the same spot!!! You can't hide!!!
Yep! That's an actual tactic to be used.
That could be a trifle harder than hitting a 9-dart finish 😂
Bunker buster USELESS garbage. Can be easily and readily defeated.
Dig a very deep "hole/tunnel/bunker" and have the sides just sufficiently strong enough to hold off sand/earth... and make the floor(s)/ceiling(s) simply strong enough to support people and needed resources so when a "bunker buster" comes sailing in it is met with no/hardly any resistance and keeps going and going and as it goes through each floor/ceiling the sides collapse and the "bunker buster" gets buried and explodes down deep and away from any vital things. Meanwhile the floors where the people are remain intact.
They are so powerful this bombs
Very well put together video here, a lot of work went into it. Well done my friend.
Wonder what a bunker buster would do to a ship at sea?
Go look up the quick sink
I think the Army has tested it in ships already. In Chinese ships, later, of course.
Pray you don't receive BUNKER BUSTER BOMBS, they end wars very quick...
Don't think so. Otherwise middle east war would have ended by now. Coz military will just drop a few bomb. And everything is considered over.
Yes, if the country has only basic air defence.
"this bunker buster bomb" (shows sixteen different weapons)
Airblast weapons are not EP weapons. Airblast weapons are not "bunker buster" weapons. "Bunker buster" weapons are Earth Penetrating.
The script that "narrator" folows just wasn't reviewed for factual information and repetition. "SPOTLIGHT" is operating on a low budget and believes that the average viewer is not that bright.
Herrlich.
Was für eine wunderbare Zerstörungskraft 😂
Davon brauchen wir mehr ❤
Sold! Two please.
Make us a video of an armored tank bomb buster,😉😉😉😊
Imagine "what if" the US had bunker busters during WWII for places like Peleliu and Iwo Jima. There would have been a lot less American blood shed as a result. Japanese losses would have been about the same given Japan's proclivities at the time of fighting to the death anyway.
@@demef758 They have its the Disney bomb, but they do not have guidence kit in Ww2.
_Imagine "what if" the US had bunker busters during WWII for places like Peleliu and Iwo Jima._
Or the German submarine bases.
There is no "what if", the allies had "tallboy" bomb and also other bunker busting bombs developed during WW2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tallboy_(bomb)
@@a64738 But the US had no capability to carry or deliver it due to its length. The UK did though, but that's not what I asked in my thought exercise.
There’s always targets that are deep enough or hardened enough to be bomb proof. If well designed and deep enough you can even withstand nukes. It’s just a case of whether it’s worth the immense cost of having facilities that complex.
May all forces of evil be destroyed in Jesus's name 🙏
THE HOLY HAND GRENADE OF ANTIOCH!
Fuck your Jew God
Jesus is a circumcision hoax
Jesus didn't recommend missiles, or even a sword. He won the battle by love, doing good, being upricht and honoring God. I cannot imagine how so much good comes from so much 'weakness'. He indeed is the Ruler of the kings, but doesn't make use of earthly weapons.
Let us 'survey the wondrous cross'.
@@mbart What?!
We need to make some 20 megaton nuclear bunker busters. You can't dig deep enough to protect your bunker then.
Whoever lives with the sword, perishes by the sword .....
wow!!!
Kinetic energy required like those rods from space
Great timing to post this. Now people will understand what happened to Iran's nuclear program and most of its military... 😁.
Its deep under mauntains dont think they reach them 😊
@@Resistanceman4life Don't think they can't -- one way or another... 😐
Wow verygood ❤❤❤
يمكن أبطال هكذا نوع من القنابل بأن يتم وضع فوق اسطح المباني أحواض تحتوي على كمية من المواد عالية اللزوجة مثل الزفت وبتالي تعيق حركة هذا النوع من القنابل
6:46 did they forget to get everyone out of that place or is that Buster
Il existe une certaine couche en composites étendue sur tout le périmètre en dessous duquel se trouve le bunker qui empêche le missile de pénétrer le sol et de le faire exploser à la surface ...
Except mountains
Ich mag Dunkle Farben...............!
Can it penetrate 10 feet strengthened tungsten?
I think bunker busters could be defeated by some kind of “ reactive armour” . Similar to what is on tanks.
Maybe Xi JINPING have so many bunkers. So bunker Buster, is for XI JINPING. HEHEHE.
"He's fine."
3:30 It will penetrate 200ft of earth. Nothing gets through 200ft of reinforced concrete.
God bless America.
Will they use them to deal with Iran ?
It....will happen!
The current Demonrat administration is intent on a one world government. It continues to send millions in "aid" to Islamist nations.
Except through natural caves & horizontal dug tunnels. Yes ..... We poor countries knew the weakness of such weapons. Ho Chi Minh trail proves it.
200 feet of reinforced concrete?!!!!! Really??
Video: "This Bunker Buster Bomb Can Break Through Anything"
2m Iran Bunker Concrete after 3 hits in the same spot:
;)
Defense: Trampoline technology.
Railgun weapons next?
No way try bombing a mountain full of rocks
I mean why do bunker engineers not simply build bunkers deep enough so that no bunker busters can penetrate them? Just build them 100 m deep, problem solved
We will use 8 masive ordinace penetras
If you build a bunker 100m deep and a bunker buster can penetrate 20m you simply drop 5 bombs one after another.
🤦😂... How's keeping the striker from launching several bombs in series
@@Zenvo-uu9tmIt doesn't work like that, not even an atomic bomb can penetrate a bunker 100 meters deep
POV: you have no idea what you’re talking about
Iran has bunkers much deeper than 100 meters, does Iran think US will only drop 1 BBB
What if the bunker is 1 km underground?
The GPU-57 bomb, designed for penetrating hardened targets, has impressive capabilities, but penetrating a bunker with 100 meters of hardened steel and 300 meters of concrete, even at a depth of 500 meters, is still an extremely challenging scenario.
1. Material Thickness: The combined thickness of 400 meters (100m of hardened steel and 300m of concrete) far exceeds the penetration capabilities of most conventional munitions. While the GPU-57 is designed to penetrate reinforced structures, such extreme thicknesses would likely be beyond its effective range.
2. Depth: At a depth of 500 meters, the additional pressure from the surrounding earth enhances the structural integrity of the bunker. This further complicates penetration efforts, as the bomb would not only have to penetrate the materials but also overcome the pressure and compression effects of the surrounding rock and earth.
3. Penetration Technology: While the GPU-57 incorporates advanced technology for penetration, including a hard steel casing and a specialized warhead, it is primarily designed for use against more conventional defensive structures. Penetrating hundreds of meters of reinforced materials would likely require specialized munitions that are explicitly designed for extreme hard-target defeat, which may not exist in current arsenals.
In conclusion, it is highly unlikely that a GPU-57 bomb could successfully penetrate a bunker reinforced to the specifications you've provided, both in terms of material thickness and depth. Such a target would require a more specialized approach or advanced munitions that can handle extreme fortifications.
2:11 someone standing in the tunnel , lower left ?
Same thing as a broad head arrow huh?Goes in the cavity and spreads
Seems your video had great timing cinsudering the us just used the gbu 57 in yemen
2:10 hehe i'll be safe here. BBB: nope
So powerful
Can it penetrate 4500+ meter tall rocky mountain? I guess not.
This is very dangerous because in 2020 there was a guy called Povandolakoviscov Kityionshikov. Why did you skip the name, now I'm not going to finish the story.
Better than a pager, oh Iran….😁👊🏻🇺🇸
put some chili powder in it too😀
taxe prayers money that's How they built their bunkers to protect the president
Everthing taxpayer shame on you
WTF are you talking about.
Try English spelling 🤔
@@majorcarlton137 try mining your own business next I don't want to Hear your toxic response
@@JaimeGerman-vc5ut Toxic? 🤣
All these I find of keen interest. The capacity to project force to negate wide-ranging physical threats outside the USA is critical to developing any society.
At 6:55, whoever made the graphics on the Lockheed Martin AGM 158 JASM ER cruise missile misspelt "Lockheed"! 🙄
Incorrect has an inground range of 100m to 200 max
Well, it is just a matter of time to develop active protection for bunkers like the active protections on, for example, tanks.... WY have none developed such already??? 🤔😉
My dude what do you think air defenses are? Dumbarse lmao
lol at 6:53 Lockheed Martin is spelled wrong.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Just need to contaminate the land with radiation.
This gave me a semi
Barms?
Rubber, Spring, Water, Laser Covers Rehural Shoot.
Iranian nuclear facilities kms underground then 2.5 m cement concrete
For below 100M strike maybe... beyond that... I think it's impossible!
You can't even damage a thang if the bunker is a mountain fortress, deeply embedded more underground reach more than 200M down below
Nuclear can!
Israel is just getting started
1.25
Carrier killer
3:05 it wasn't command bunker , google alamyriah shutter.
is there ur car ? yes sure ,ti car is versatile ,if you want to save the environment .
😱
I have a strong red coloured umbrella... - they couldn't destroy for sure... 😂Vivian Hyde 😊
Nasrallah’s elimination by the Israeli Air Force was executed with Israeli-made weapons!
mine is better two reasons one it is galvanized no need for strategic metal and two MINE is threaded you know what that is a GIANT LAG that is it full stop can sell you one they go by the pound it just screws itself to whatever no directions even required
Not the sun.
Tun tuh ruhn
This means by by Irans nuclear facilities.
We dont need weapon 😭 we beed only travel✈️
Spend 5 Million dollar for a Bomb to eliminate 10 lifes. Or spend the money to save 10 lifes for lifetime. What would you do?
Shhhh.. Don't tell anyone.. But, we (USA - and almost certainly Israel as well) have lower yield nuclear bunker busters in the MOP format.. ala the 57..
Not a word about the Israeli air force in this newly uploaded video?
H-bombs work too....
Dunkle Grünen Farben...................
Wow another Top gun scene but this is real not movie 🎥 😢😢😢 the bomb really drill all the way into the other side of the earth 🌍 😢😢😢
Very cool, liked and subscribed.
I hate these videos that are composed of stolen footage mashed together with AI generated audio
Terrorisome bomb 🤔🤔
THIS VIDEO GLORIFIES TEXTBOOK DEFINITION OF TERRORISM.
Sounds like a hot date 😅.
Fake? Lockhed Martin. No delayed explosions 7:10.
I wonder
never forget - God is an American.
Everyone thinks God is on their side.
@@carlosclaptrix how do you know what everyone thinks ?
Using for oil search 😅