Why would there be haters? It is an educational, unbiased channel. I don’t expect him to get everything 100% right, but I highly doubt he works for the Department of Defense.
Thank you for taking my advice and not putting bunch of old clips together to make the video lengthy. Keep up the good work and we will keep supporting!
1:38 200 ft of soil or 200ft of reinforced concrete? Previous 2 devices were to penetrate 5 and 20ft respectively. I highly doubt this mop can penetrate 200ft of continued reinforced concrete. It is just physically impossible. Even 200ft of regular soil seems to be a stretch. Maybe some soft soil.
Bunkers are usually dug under a rocky mountain or hill. Compressive strength of granite is several times higher than reinforced concrete. Again, the munition is limited to vertical impact which would not be ideal to caves/bunkers dug at the base of a mountain. Nice animation work though
@@PhilipOberg It took over 80 to hit Nasrahla's bunker, and his was only 18 meters deep. Not easy at all. Ridiculously expensive, and requires the enemy to not have air defenses at all.
@@armarmo964 it's gotta be a best case. Using newtons penetration approximation, this thing is about 10x the density of dirt (weight over volume treating it as a cylinder) so ya, it could get about 200ft in dirt... But reinforced concrete? It would need something more than mere kinetics.
Yeah, I'd say 200ft of dirt was possible but there's no way to punch through that much concrete using kinetics alone outside of dropping massive tungsten rods from orbit
I'm in no way a scientist but how would it displace 200 feet of material? I imagine in most cases it would go upward and into said building that the bomb just punched a hole into, but I figured that it would get exponentially harder to do the further down the bomb went.
@@HoodieProduction I'm just going to say straight that GBU-57 can't penetrate 60 meters of 'reinforced' concrete. That's a lot of concrete. I'm pretty sure he meant 60 meters of soil.
@@FacitOmniaVoluntas. my ai detector is pretty good and i can detect ai slop when i see it. i dont think these are ai generated (they might use ai to help) but its not a sora video with 8 fingers on 1 hand if you know what i mean.
The MOP is actually a tandem warkead device. The front of it uses kinetic energy to penetrate to about 80 feet (or until it decellerates to anout 30% of the maximum velocity) then it triggers a shape charge penetrator that drills a pilot hole for the next 60 feet or so. When the device stops or detects a sudden chsnge of resistance it sets off its main charge.
@DjDolHaus86 Somewhat reliably does not cut it. It should be extremely reliable under the worst conditions based on the specifications set by the USA DOD. Reliability is the main reason the word "military grade" exists.
@DjDolHaus86 Serving has nothing to do with knowing a definition. Military grade means a product that satisfies the MIL-STD-810 standard for stress testing. That means heightened reliability. Not average.
That is not surprising. GPS receivers are not the same and the US military has its own military satellites that are more advanced for GPS location and guidance.
"The user range error (URE) of the GPS signals in space is actually the same for the civilian and military GPS services. However, most of today's civilian devices use only one GPS frequency, while military receivers use two. Using two GPS frequencies improves accuracy by correcting signal distortions caused by Earth's atmosphere. Dual-frequency GPS equipment is commercially available for civilian use, but its cost and size has limited it to professional applications." thats from the GPS gov page so techinically they use the same thing but the "military GPS" is just more reliable i guess
in WWII, German U-boat pens had at least 2, sometimes 3, 8 - 10 foot thick reinforced concrete roofs with a 12 foot gap between them. The largest bombs dropped by the British would detonate on the 1st & perhaps damage the 2nd, leaving the 3rd undamaged.
If marketing had its way it would go through to China. (Tungsten is not a new element and gravity can only provide a certain amount of velocity. This thing is only 2 tons)
Basically : if the pressure is high enough earth and stone becomes soft like butter. Germany invented this in WW2 named röchling shell. It was a subcaliber artillery shell that penetrated 40m of earth and limestone in belgian forts.
Excellent info you can't find anywhere else. You guys are awesome. One correction at the the end of the video when talking about the MOAB, it doesn't suck the air out of anything. It makes a pressure wave going outwards, there is no vacuum happening. As amazing as the MOP bomb is, I would love to see a super powerful rocket motor attached to the back to accelerate it to mach 2-3. I wonder if the high velocity would cause it to fly apart and penetrate less, kind of like a 9mm FMJ going further into water than a high speed rifle bullet, which flies apart and dissipates it's energy in a shorter distance. If anyone can do finite element analysis on mach 1 vs mach 3 MOP impacts and penetrative, I'd love to see it.
Asalkan negara berdemokrasi yg bertujuan kebaikan dunia mungkin bisa bertahan lama, jika negara/kerajaan berbuat se enaknya sendiri atau sesuka hati negara itu, saya rasa tidak bertahan lama
Really enjoy your videos. Can you consider including sources for information to corroborate what you’re presenting? In addition to allowing us to dig in more on our own, I think it will provide a big credibility boost to your content
Bunker Busting Bombs by the US.... B61-11 Bomb: 30-40 feet (9-12 meters) GBU-28 Bomb: 60-80 feet (18-24 meters) GBU-57 Bomb: 100-150 feet (30-45 meters) The bomb type and material and well also the angle of attack are all factors as to the depth the bomb will penetrate. I have never heard of any bunker busting bomb penetrating 60 meters of solid concrete.
yes more like ~50 meters of soil and then the bunker. the bomb detonates when it senses a change in pressure, so whenever it hits the concrete. the explosion will handle much of the rest even if it is more than a one story bunker
Few questions /(content ideas): - how does one detect underground bunker ? - how do u insure the bomb reaches its target before exploding? Why doesn't explod if two structures are built on top of each other ? Or if it the structure is less then 60m and the bomb is set to explode at that depth? - how does a bunker work? - how do u safe guard a underground bunker? - what's the difference between underground and under a mountain bunker? - how Abt a nuclear grade bunker, how do they fair against these type of "normal bombs"?
Enter the B61-12 Mod 11 thermonuclear bomb. The B61-12 was designed as a bunker buster that seems to be able to penetrate only 3-6 meters of frozen soil, but it can blast through 15 meters of concrete. It also has a dialable yield, between 0.3-400 kilotons.
Always big fan 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😇😇
Really to get a simplified session like this channel so difficult but you do to change peoples' undetstanding concering of science such kind of vidios will be more important as thick so the chemistry behind buster bomb and material science it is so amazing
Bomb busters do not penetrate hard ruck. There is no metal that is hard enough to do it. However they do work on concrete because concrete is not hard when it spread horizontally such as a wall or roofs.
It can penetrate US bunkers. They are made with wood and plaster. Other parts of the world use concrete and steel. So it bounces of and does not damage.
Steel roof not strong enough, You need titanium or very massive mass of steel like a 10 meters of steel, it's like building 5 tanks in under the earth each on top of the other. To much reassures for something static that can be easily penetrated in the end. Iran is a poor country a failing politics ppl live there like in the Bible times for protection against such attacks.
Tidak mungkin bisa menembus 60meter, karna bisa masuk tanah itu perhitunganya dari berat rudal itu, boor kilang minyak aja bisa mencapai 60meter butuh waktu itu ujungnya di kasih mata boor, kecuali banyak rudal di arahkan 1 titik
There was war well before there was riches (& certainly before non-violent intellectual theory). There is war now even in impoverished places. War is a natural game of warriors & killers , not just the rich. Since you mentioned game of thrones, The Hound sums it up nicely in one monologue
@@BUKUDI The rich capitalize on everything, including war. Now the rich have an agenda the military is helping fulfil, depopulation. That is what fighting men are only accomplishing. All leaders are captured and compliant with globalization by the few. War may be a thrill for some men, who can't see what the real purpose is.
@jonjames7328 I understand that. War is about a few men gaining power to control the world, history proves this. Leaders are all under control of these men. Those who fight think it's honorable to kill innocent people for greedy leaders, this is the issue I have today. We live in peace but that's about to change. The greedy want utter control over all our lives. I find that disturbing, if one can see where it's all going.
Since the US blocked S.Korea's nuclear development, they made a bunker buster with an 8ton warhead called "Hyeonmoo" as a last resort. This monster missile was designed to descend at a speed of Mach 10 and hit N.Korea's underground bunkers 100 meters deep, but if the warhead is reduced, the maximum range is 5,000 kilometers, so it can check China and Russia. Nuclear weapons are weapons for military demonstrations that cannot be used internationally, but the scary thing about the 8-ton monster missile is that there are no restrictions on its use.
@@Wüstenfuchs-x2b as long as North Korea fires it's available nukes even if 1-5 it's game over.. There us a reason they haven't attempted this bullshit ur saying
Is there a video or something that shows how deep the 57 goes? Couple days ago I was hammering a pole into the ground in my backyard, I remember the sheer struggle I felt getting 5 feet of that thing into the ground. I can't imagine how a bomb would travel 200ft+ into the ground.
@@blaque5900 There's none, because It won't be able to do so. It could be easily stopped by thick walls. This channel exaggerates it so it can have more views.
@@blaque5900 I have my doubts as to the penetration ability they are claiming in this video as well, 200 ft of reinforced concrete seems like kind of a stretch… Maybe someone with a physics background can elaborate
Yes, he is forgetting hardness and the physical shape of the projectile, surfaces like concrete and dirt are as soft as butter versus a very hard, fast projectile
@@dustondoesit3913the bomb itself has no propulsion system, which means that gravity does everything with respect to moving downward towards the target. therefore there must be a system that does the actual penetration through the earth before the actual blast. what is that mechanism?
@the_craptain it's not physically possible, that's why we drill into concrete. There isn't even a bullet which is alot smaller that could go through 200ft of concrete
i want you to think about what you just said. have you no concept of what kinetic energy is? comparing a many thousand pound high strength steel penetrator to a bullet is peak stupidity.
You said at the beginning of the video that the GBU57 bomb can penetrate 20 metres of soil or reinforced concrete. But they are not the same because the resistance to the movement of the bomb is higher in concrete than in soil therefore penetration depth should be less in concrete.
Subscribe - Basic Engineering is for all even for Haters too.
Make a video on total Israels power and weapons
Make an alternate history video titled nato vs Warsaw pact war, it will get you a lot of views
@@Aitelly I'm a lover not a hater. Very interesting. Happy subscriber
Why would there be haters? It is an educational, unbiased channel. I don’t expect him to get everything 100% right, but I highly doubt he works for the Department of Defense.
and innocent palestinian native to land loosing life.
The MOP can’t penetrate 200 ft of reinforced concrete. It can penetrate 200 ft of earth.
@@RobertSmith-wj7zf officially
@@RobertSmith-wj7zf either way that’s crazy.
@@Dadbod007 True
And 5 ft is neither 1.2 nor 1.8 meters.
@@RobertSmith-wj7zf yes the video says it both ways. Clearly inconsistent.
How many times do you want to say "the mob penetrates 200ft"
AiTelly: "YES"
Thank you for taking my advice and not putting bunch of old clips together to make the video lengthy. Keep up the good work and we will keep supporting!
You are Awesome 🙌 thanks for the Suggestion
Ofc they TOOK YOUR ADVICE😂
I picked up on that too, when they re-used prior footage. That said, this is still a fantastic channel! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
I was waiting for this issue to be noticed I was like watching same video over and over
Thanks Ai Telly
What would we do with you Random RUclips User lol
Finally, someone to shed some light on these types of bombs because they all fascinate me. Nice animations ❤
1:38 200 ft of soil or 200ft of reinforced concrete? Previous 2 devices were to penetrate 5 and 20ft respectively. I highly doubt this mop can penetrate 200ft of continued reinforced concrete. It is just physically impossible. Even 200ft of regular soil seems to be a stretch. Maybe some soft soil.
Wikipedia says 200ft, but it doesn't specify whether it's soil or concrete. Regardless, it's complete BS.
Not by purely kinetic force, it uses a large tantalum EFP warhead to drill
Maybe not one, but several into the same spot timed to arrive at different times, then yes easy
Bunkers are usually dug under a rocky mountain or hill. Compressive strength of granite is several times higher than reinforced concrete. Again, the munition is limited to vertical impact which would not be ideal to caves/bunkers dug at the base of a mountain. Nice animation work though
@@PhilipOberg It took over 80 to hit Nasrahla's bunker, and his was only 18 meters deep. Not easy at all. Ridiculously expensive, and requires the enemy to not have air defenses at all.
200ft of concrete is hard to believe, there should be some test proof
@@armarmo964 it's gotta be a best case. Using newtons penetration approximation, this thing is about 10x the density of dirt (weight over volume treating it as a cylinder) so ya, it could get about 200ft in dirt... But reinforced concrete? It would need something more than mere kinetics.
Yeah, I'd say 200ft of dirt was possible but there's no way to punch through that much concrete using kinetics alone outside of dropping massive tungsten rods from orbit
been done
I'm in no way a scientist but how would it displace 200 feet of material? I imagine in most cases it would go upward and into said building that the bomb just punched a hole into, but I figured that it would get exponentially harder to do the further down the bomb went.
@@HoodieProduction I'm just going to say straight that GBU-57 can't penetrate 60 meters of 'reinforced' concrete. That's a lot of concrete. I'm pretty sure he meant 60 meters of soil.
You guys should make a course or masterclass on how to make animations like this
I was about to say something similar. Very cool. I want to channel mine Into proper history story telling.
It’s AI generated
@@FacitOmniaVoluntas. It's not. they making it with Blender
@@FacitOmniaVoluntas. my ai detector is pretty good and i can detect ai slop when i see it. i dont think these are ai generated (they might use ai to help) but its not a sora video with 8 fingers on 1 hand if you know what i mean.
North Korea and China say thank you very much !!
The MOP is actually a tandem warkead device. The front of it uses kinetic energy to penetrate to about 80 feet (or until it decellerates to anout 30% of the maximum velocity) then it triggers a shape charge penetrator that drills a pilot hole for the next 60 feet or so. When the device stops or detects a sudden chsnge of resistance it sets off its main charge.
Remember kids “military grade” doesn’t always equate to better equipment…
military grade is often used to denote reliability with minimal failures even in the worst conditions.
Military grade means the cheapest thing that'd do the job somewhat reliably
@DjDolHaus86 Somewhat reliably does not cut it. It should be extremely reliable under the worst conditions based on the specifications set by the USA DOD. Reliability is the main reason the word "military grade" exists.
@@jkagwen have you ever served?
@DjDolHaus86 Serving has nothing to do with knowing a definition. Military grade means a product that satisfies the MIL-STD-810 standard for stress testing. That means heightened reliability. Not average.
The FIRST Bunker Busters were made from oil field drill pipe. That pipe is incredibly tough and penetrated DEEP!
"military grade GPS"
😂😂😂
That is not surprising. GPS receivers are not the same and the US military has its own military satellites that are more advanced for GPS location and guidance.
"The user range error (URE) of the GPS signals in space is actually the same for the civilian and military GPS services. However, most of today's civilian devices use only one GPS frequency, while military receivers use two.
Using two GPS frequencies improves accuracy by correcting signal distortions caused by Earth's atmosphere. Dual-frequency GPS equipment is commercially available for civilian use, but its cost and size has limited it to professional applications."
thats from the GPS gov page so techinically they use the same thing but the "military GPS" is just more reliable i guess
@@wolfschadow6399 I highly doubt it. Airliners need precise GPS for navigation. Thousands of lives depend on it every day.
Your life does not depend on gps in an airliner
So much knowledge and money invested into destruction .
Until the end
Round is Not scary pointy is scary ~A famous legend
@@kakchingtabamsantosh7604 hahaha the dictator
in WWII, German U-boat pens had at least 2, sometimes 3, 8 - 10 foot thick reinforced concrete roofs with a 12 foot gap between them. The largest bombs dropped by the British would detonate on the 1st & perhaps damage the 2nd, leaving the 3rd undamaged.
It’s very interesting Bomb, I gonna make it with LEGO Parts👍
Thank you for incredible video❤️👏
*Dear Santa..*
You want Santa to drop one of these down your chimney? /joking
If marketing had its way it would go through to China. (Tungsten is not a new element and gravity can only provide a certain amount of velocity. This thing is only 2 tons)
@@Leo-Orbis Now that's what I call not being specific with your wishes 🤣🤣
@@matodiniv Christmas would be a blast, though.
Lmao 😂
I like your 3d presentations. Good job as always.
Basically : if the pressure is high enough earth and stone becomes soft like butter. Germany invented this in WW2 named röchling shell. It was a subcaliber artillery shell that penetrated 40m of earth and limestone in belgian forts.
A heavy kinetic impact with a hardened nail
Mans gets straight to the point no intro no nothing 🫶🏼
Excellent info you can't find anywhere else. You guys are awesome. One correction at the the end of the video when talking about the MOAB, it doesn't suck the air out of anything. It makes a pressure wave going outwards, there is no vacuum happening.
As amazing as the MOP bomb is, I would love to see a super powerful rocket motor attached to the back to accelerate it to mach 2-3. I wonder if the high velocity would cause it to fly apart and penetrate less, kind of like a 9mm FMJ going further into water than a high speed rifle bullet, which flies apart and dissipates it's energy in a shorter distance. If anyone can do finite element analysis on mach 1 vs mach 3 MOP impacts and penetrative, I'd love to see it.
Thanks for your feedback Truly grateful for the feedback
Man, you and your team are Rockstars. Incredible visuals and intel. Mad props to you. Love your channel. Smart people always succeed!
this channel is actally the best
1:00 "2000 pound or bomb" not sure where you're going with this.
He says "2000 pounder bomb"
What a marvelous tech animated.
That's what they used to take down the trade center
كل شيء يصنع إلاّ الشجاعة و الصّبر 🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻✊🇵🇸
Thanks for making this information available to countries that may not have it👊🏻
60m is unbelievable!
That's 60M on dirt not reinforced cement lol
@@Madworld_NZ Also US dirt. Other parts of the world have more compact soil.
No it's cheese
This is a fantastic example of content sharing. Keep up the outstanding work, and we’ll be here to support you!
Thanks 🙏🏻👍🏻
every empire has an end
@@kinandamaarifa4207 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Absolutely no empire or country has existed forever
most of them are 100 years and make change or will end US looks like it going to end and soon as they are only as divel
Some empires have existed for thousands of years,
Asalkan negara berdemokrasi yg bertujuan kebaikan dunia mungkin bisa bertahan lama, jika negara/kerajaan berbuat se enaknya sendiri atau sesuka hati negara itu, saya rasa tidak bertahan lama
You are really good at making videos relevant to topical events, like a video version of the twitter OSINT community with good animation as well.
Ai Telly you this is the best channel for science Lovers!
Great work man 👍🏼
Huge respect for work.
The most beautiful channel and the most beautiful explanation 👏👏👏
I m a new sub, love your vids!! The comparison are the best part and i could watch for 1 hour
That dropping sound effect 😅
I usually don't watch full RUclips videos, but I watched this one all the way through.
Notice the air gap between the payload and the shell, that's purposeful.
The whole thing is purposeful
😍 very nice explanations
I like the fact the GBU-57 has a cobalt casing, like the doomsday bomb in the film Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970)
I like the original Planet of the Apes. " you idiots blew it up "😂😊
wow, never would've thought it's from 1970
It looks too 60s-ish for a 1970 movie
@@Wonkabar007 more talkers than knowers. I know these...cobalt? No.
Apparently they work very well !
60 meter 😯 unbelievable technology !!
Really enjoy your videos. Can you consider including sources for information to corroborate what you’re presenting? In addition to allowing us to dig in more on our own, I think it will provide a big credibility boost to your content
Test ground : Lebanon 😢
@@THE_YAD 😂😂 good one
@@THE_YAD while they were hiding underneath lol.
Ok
Cry
@@THE_YAD tested in Yemen I think.
Really enjoy watching your videos. Great work!!
I love the fact that America made a bunker buster bomb out of a howitzer barrel in a couple of days just in time for Desert Storm! 😅
These type of channels are damn addicting for me for no reason
Informative, interesting & illustrative graphics presentation which is a very effective way of disseminating information! I learnt a lot!
Bunker Busting Bombs by the US.... B61-11 Bomb: 30-40 feet (9-12 meters) GBU-28 Bomb: 60-80 feet (18-24 meters) GBU-57 Bomb: 100-150 feet (30-45 meters)
The bomb type and material and well also the angle of attack are all factors as to the depth the bomb will penetrate.
I have never heard of any bunker busting bomb penetrating 60 meters of solid concrete.
@@Eric_W
I really wonder why targeting bunkers is a thing now
@@JRBX-09 looks like they don't want survivors left
yes more like ~50 meters of soil and then the bunker. the bomb detonates when it senses a change in pressure, so whenever it hits the concrete. the explosion will handle much of the rest even if it is more than a one story bunker
Few questions /(content ideas):
- how does one detect underground bunker ?
- how do u insure the bomb reaches its target before exploding? Why doesn't explod if two structures are built on top of each other ? Or if it the structure is less then 60m and the bomb is set to explode at that depth?
- how does a bunker work?
- how do u safe guard a underground bunker?
- what's the difference between underground and under a mountain bunker?
- how Abt a nuclear grade bunker, how do they fair against these type of "normal bombs"?
Suplja americka prica pada u vodu
Good useful info with video animation pieced it all together nice .
They are so powerful this bombs
Great job with the video and animation!
why americans failed to use the metric system?
We run the world lil bro. We do what we want.
@@amateur_adventurist we don’t want to be like everyone else. We run the world lil bro. We do what we want.
@@meintingles4396🙏🏾 High five
There are countries who use the metric system and there is a country who put men on the moon. We'll be fine champ. Thanks.
Imperial units got boots on the moon first
Very informative video and well done! Made me hit the subscribe button!
great technology making this kind of bomb😮
Nukes are the ultimate bunker buster because they just vaporize stuff
Enter the B61-12 Mod 11 thermonuclear bomb. The B61-12 was designed as a bunker buster that seems to be able to penetrate only 3-6 meters of frozen soil, but it can blast through 15 meters of concrete. It also has a dialable yield, between 0.3-400 kilotons.
Always big fan 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😇😇
Really to get a simplified session like this channel so difficult but you do to change peoples' undetstanding concering of science such kind of vidios will be more important as thick so the chemistry behind buster bomb and material science it is so amazing
0:28 Thought you were describing me 💪
Too much steroid 🙄.
Wtf are you yapping abt
@@sammni 👍
I know it's not called "How a Bunker Buster Busts Bunkers" but it's such fun to say I've been at it for over an hour now.
This AI needed a human editor badly. Badly.
Great video as always.
Its a bad ass bomb. Just from the videos alone and from an engineering standpoint.
Bomb busters do not penetrate hard ruck. There is no metal that is hard enough to do it. However they do work on concrete because concrete is not hard when it spread horizontally such as a wall or roofs.
Note that the depth that the bomb itself reaches is HIGHLY INACCURATE.
Send your location let's try it 😂
Love your contents dude
You are saying this bomb can penetrate 60 meter of Reinforced concrete?
That's insane!!
Nt exactly
It can penetrate US bunkers. They are made with wood and plaster. Other parts of the world use concrete and steel. So it bounces of and does not damage.
no
That reinforced concrete jazz also has me scratching my head 🤔
"Kaboom?"
"Yes Rico, kaboom"
What if you re-enforce with a steel roof then what
Steel roof not strong enough, You need titanium or very massive mass of steel like a 10 meters of steel, it's like building 5 tanks in under the earth each on top of the other. To much reassures for something static that can be easily penetrated in the end. Iran is a poor country a failing politics ppl live there like in the Bible times for protection against such attacks.
@@LeaPaund Scary stuff.
Okay Bro, I have just subscribed, you make such good effort that it is impossible not to watch your content.
Wow! Is this how sophisticated aerial bombardments have become?
These things make me happy.
Great animation
Great educational video, watching this from my underground bunker right now.
Tidak mungkin bisa menembus 60meter, karna bisa masuk tanah itu perhitunganya dari berat rudal itu, boor kilang minyak aja bisa mencapai 60meter butuh waktu itu ujungnya di kasih mata boor, kecuali banyak rudal di arahkan 1 titik
Superb presentation!
When will we stop idolizing war and realize it's a rich man's game of thrones. Stop fighting and dieing for these few men.
There was war well before there was riches (& certainly before non-violent intellectual theory). There is war now even in impoverished places. War is a natural game of warriors & killers , not just the rich. Since you mentioned game of thrones, The Hound sums it up nicely in one monologue
@@BUKUDI The rich capitalize on everything, including war. Now the rich have an agenda the military is helping fulfil, depopulation. That is what fighting men are only accomplishing. All leaders are captured and compliant with globalization by the few.
War may be a thrill for some men, who can't see what the real purpose is.
I am Ukrainian. I would like to see what you would do if someone came for your motherland. Just crawl in your bed and cry?
@@tallcedars2310 Evolutionary baggage. Survival bred greed and tribalism when life was much harsher, and those breed violence.
@jonjames7328 I understand that. War is about a few men gaining power to control the world, history proves this. Leaders are all under control of these men. Those who fight think it's honorable to kill innocent people for greedy leaders, this is the issue I have today. We live in peace but that's about to change. The greedy want utter control over all our lives. I find that disturbing, if one can see where it's all going.
Amazing work. Cool channel !
Thankyou AiTelly, from India 🇮🇳
I needed that vid hahaha perfect timing
Since the US blocked S.Korea's nuclear development, they made a bunker buster with an 8ton warhead called "Hyeonmoo" as a last resort. This monster missile was designed to descend at a speed of Mach 10 and hit N.Korea's underground bunkers 100 meters deep, but if the warhead is reduced, the maximum range is 5,000 kilometers, so it can check China and Russia. Nuclear weapons are weapons for military demonstrations that cannot be used internationally, but the scary thing about the 8-ton monster missile is that there are no restrictions on its use.
So Israel would use something like this against Iranian bunkers
Yes, basically a bunker buster on an ICBM
They (Zionists) declared war for weapons testing 😔😢
@@Wüstenfuchs-x2b as long as North Korea fires it's available nukes even if 1-5 it's game over.. There us a reason they haven't attempted this bullshit ur saying
Excellent information kaboom!
Is there a video or something that shows how deep the 57 goes? Couple days ago I was hammering a pole into the ground in my backyard, I remember the sheer struggle I felt getting 5 feet of that thing into the ground. I can't imagine how a bomb would travel 200ft+ into the ground.
@@blaque5900 on paper
@@blaque5900 There's none, because It won't be able to do so. It could be easily stopped by thick walls. This channel exaggerates it so it can have more views.
@@blaque5900 I have my doubts as to the penetration ability they are claiming in this video as well, 200 ft of reinforced concrete seems like kind of a stretch…
Maybe someone with a physics background can elaborate
@@mumfordalien1794no my friend I think it’s pretty accurate
@@maatagentsmith5800 source: Trust me bro
Great update
Epic explanation
Thanks!
Busted in bunking and bombs is a Master technology , those bunk busters
😂😂😂Sir, Mass and velocity alone do not explain how these bombs penetrate compacted earth and concrete. What is the real truth!?😅😅😅
Yes, he is forgetting hardness and the physical shape of the projectile, surfaces like concrete and dirt are as soft as butter versus a very hard, fast projectile
@@dustondoesit3913the bomb itself has no propulsion system, which means that gravity does everything with respect to moving downward towards the target. therefore there must be a system that does the actual penetration through the earth before the actual blast. what is that mechanism?
It also has to do with the density of the materials that it’s made from
Even drilling bits made of hhs, coated with titanium gets damage with earth rock.... How it's possible this hollow bb penetrate inside that deep😅?
@@Honïe4 that's the great secret...if we knew what that material is...?
Good work 🎉
Not a big fan group of bunker busters: Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, Hassan Nasrallah, Ali Khamenei, the bunker itself.
True but Khamenei is still alive, Osama was caught above ground in a house, Sadam was caught alive also so....
@@infiniterer287 how much weed did you smoke today?
@@Jousef-hu2ov For saying the truth? How pathetic are you is the real question.
@@Jousef-hu2ov Oh, totally missed your name "JOOOOOOSEPH". Ziotrash by any chance?
@@F90M5 Sadam is in a grave amd everyonr knows it was just AI
I love this channel
No way it can just penetrate through 200ft of reinforced concrete. It would be crushed in 20ft
@@adamx1748 nuh uhh
@@adamx1748
present your thesis
@the_craptain it's not physically possible, that's why we drill into concrete. There isn't even a bullet which is alot smaller that could go through 200ft of concrete
i want you to think about what you just said. have you no concept of what kinetic energy is? comparing a many thousand pound high strength steel penetrator to a bullet is peak stupidity.
I agree, 200ft of concrete is impossible.
This is very impressive considering bunkers are very thick made by solid cement or most of the time iron.(And also it's installed w/ gps)
60 m!! its really hard to believe it cuz is so hard rocks small stones will slow down
Nice sharing❤❤❤
Iran! Iran!! Iran!!! How many time did I call you?
🤫 Ain Al Assad Strike 🤫
Calling for death to countries, arming terrorist proxies, oppressing it's own people? Sounds like an enemy to any free person
You said at the beginning of the video that the GBU57 bomb can penetrate 20 metres of soil or reinforced concrete. But they are not the same because the resistance to the movement of the bomb is higher in concrete than in soil therefore penetration depth should be less in concrete.