It's funny, in the US itself citizens have not had any rights or freedoms for a long time, maybe Americans should discover this fact before worrying about Russia?
@@amateuramateur250 🤣 tell me what's not free🤡? How come Russia arrest people for even filming video of destruction in Russia? Don't you dare mention the word war in Russia 🤣 the Russian people live in one big prison under their coward dictator 🤡
No my friend is not about think 2 or 10 times is just to think that if that thing is armed and in the air millions of people will die in the next 30 minutes and nobody can do nothing to stop it That is to think about
If the US used atomic bomb to end a war, Russia can also use its nuclear weapon to end a war even if no sides will win, does it even matter for Russia? I don't think so.
@@kdennis9115: Maybe Planet Earth wins. Planet Earth would be much better off without the billions of humans infesting it like a plague and making hundreds of other species extinct. Look at how the wildlife in Chernobyl thrived after all the humans left!
@@resulovayolu640 🤣 the amount the US spends a year solely maintaining its nuclear program Russia spends on its entire military budget 🤣 hate to break the news to you but Russia doesn't have half the operational nukes they claim to 🤣
To be clear:- Satan-2 is one of several new nuclear delivery systems Russia has developed with the aim of overcoming evolving U.S. missile defense capabilities. The silo-based weapon measures 3 meters in diameter, 35.5 meters long, and weighs 229 tons-making it the heaviest ICBM on the planet once it enters service. The liquid-fueled missile boosts in three stages, allowing it to accelerate to a peak velocity exceeding 20 times the speed of sound as it arcs towards targets up to 6,800 to 11,000 miles away depending on payload. A successful test in April 2022 saw an RS-28 traverse roughly 3700 miles in 20 minutes-equating to an average speed of Mach 14.5, or over three miles per second. The Satan-2’s “bus” can accommodate up to 10 tons of weapons including 10 to 16 separate nuclear warheads (known as Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles or MIRVs), which can spray out to accurately attack separate targets, multiplying the number threats a defense system has to overcome. A typical Russian heavy MIRV might have a yield equivalent to 750 kilotons, or 50 times more powerful than the Little Boy bomb dropped by the U.S. on Hiroshima, Japan in 1945.
It doesn't fire it's engine in the silon, US ICBMs do that. It leaves the silo via cold launch ejection and only fires it's engines when its clear to avoid damaging the silo
@@gintasvilkelis2544 1 is all it is needed anyway...so maybe people should not take as beeing safe... btw afaik it had 1 failed lounch.... Tridend had 2 or 3 just in past 6 months
@@kalin3430 yes,but you know, it does not matter on internet if it is true or if it is false, they just need enough people to repeat it so it become the truth...on internet.
Пентагону известна информация о каждой такой ракете, я уверен, все шахты, места базирования мобильных комплексов ракетоносителей, всё отслеживается со спутников, стоит только вылететь такой ракете уже через несколько секунд о ней будут здать в пентагоне, другой вопрос как эту ракету сбить
Yes, and Pentagon has seen that this missile so far has not had even a single 100% successful test. The Soviet ICBM expertise was located entirely within Ukraine, so it's been inaccessible to Russia since 2014.
Avangard is not standalone ICBM... It's a hypersonic glide vehicle mounted on an ICBM, like the RS-28. I am not sure if the RS-24 Yars can also be used to deliver the Avangard. Oh and don't forget the 2 Megaton nuclear payload the Avangard can carry (directly to Zelensky's front doorstep 😂😂)
It's fascinating how the US didn't learn, but still keep provoking Russia. Whenever they has done a move to threaten Russia, Russia has came out of the situation much stronger. The same will happen now with Ukraine. Ukraine project was created to weaken Russia, but they weakened themselves 🤣
@@GarWhittaker Более 50 стран прямо или косвенно воюют против России, а Россия даже 20% своих сил не задействовала Тут важно понимать главное - Россия освобождает своих адекватных людей и исконно русские города на Украине. Поэтому бои ведут вдали от крупны городов, и поэтому русский город Киев не испарился в считанные минуты. Города стран НАТО Россия своими не считает.
@@GarWhittaker Копируем хронологию и вспоминаем почему проект украина прекращает своё существование *Для тех, кто считает что в Украине НЕТ нацистов и фашистов! ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО К ПРОСМОТРУ* *Артём Гришанов - Игрушки / Toys for Poroshenko / War in Ukraine (English subtitles)*
Well, it's like with the Vatican. for a long time they believed that the pope was the first and foremost on earth after God, but the problem is that the Orthodox patriarchs never recognized this, however, as did Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus. In China, by the way, it is called by locals Under heavenly, they believe that China is the center of the world, and everything else is its outskirts.So a similar hubris happened to the United States as to the Vatican
Nothing they revealed is even remotely new..EXCEPT for the MARV re-entry vehicles.. And they are not new..another "magic decade" idea...but only just now being put on multiple warhead missiles. The Pershing -2 had a MARV warhead...in the late 80's..but it was a single RV missile.
то что взорвалась на испытаниях. это радует. значит придумали, что то новое к ракете и испытывают. можно вспомнить как ракета с пл чуть не угробила министра обороны англии
Yep that's the missile the West claimed exploded during launch, but I find it hard to trust Western narratives these days. Let's not forget, every country faces military accidents. Remember how the UK's nuke launching failed a few months ago? And the U.S. has had its share of mishaps too, like when their Minuteman III missile test failed
Poseidon can devastate a port - but not a whole country. Poseidon can create a tsunami - but only a very small one compared to the Tohuku tsunami that hit Japan in 2011.
@@timonsolus? It makes that tsunami look like a ripple in a pond . Poseidons 100ft wall of water at 500mph which wipes out coasts . 350 times more damage than Hiroshima and makes the land radioactive ( uninhabitable)
I Heard they want to use it on Ukraine just with regular warhead instead Nuclear, for testing, there is story for kinetic warheads also since it's very fast and falling from space....
Why use them when we have hypersonic missiles "Kinzhal" and missiles "Kalibr" with a range of 5,500 kilometers and the air defense of Ukraine is almost completely paralyzed?:) Don't believe the myths.
Wait, the warheads are impact detonated? Would there not be a larger blast radius if it was detonated at altitude? Also allowing for a larger EMP affected area?
They won't, because they don't even fly. Out of five test launch attempts, 4 were unsuccessful, during one of them, the rocket exploded in the mine, leaving behind a 62-meter in diameter crater
Castle bravo was intended to have a yield of 6 megatons, but turned out to be 15 megatons. Tsar bomba was intended to be 100 megatons, was downsized to 50 megatons and turned out to be 55 megatons.
The speed according to the documentation is 27000km/h, actually achieved during the test of 33000km/h. You can calculate the flight time to any point of the earth.
@@DirkDiggler-qp3vm Lol, now give me some proof from independent and neutral experts who would confirm your lies))) Or did very "truthful SNN" tell you this? ;-)
How the RS-28 Sarmat 'Satan II' Works? Except for its first test flight, it doesn't. The last time they tried to launch it, it was quite spectacular as it blew up in its silo.
@@sergeistokmann4444 In the USSR, all the Soviet ICBMs were designed and manufactured in Ukraine. Now Russians don't know what they are doing, and it shows.
@@gintasvilkelis2544что ты знаешь о России? В СССР работали над оружием все институты страны, а на Украине размещали. А Украина сейчас патроны не может делать, ей со всех стран дают их. Вон, Илон Маск кучу своих ракет угробил, пока наконец полетела. А что Россия может делать и сделает - интернет тебе в помощь. А ты глупости великие пишешь или ты украинец.))
@@sergeistokmann4444 All Soviet ICBMs were made in Yuzhmash, in Ukraine. In 1991 Russia lost control of those facilities, and in 2014 Russia lost Ukrainians' willingness to collaborate on that technology. These days, North Korea is more capable than Russia.
@@AlexanderSchreiber разрабатывалось всё русскими на Украине и не более.как только вы отвалились все технологии забрали и поэтому вы за 30 лет ничего сами не можете создать своего!
@@ayannasir6653 Жидкостные обеспечивают большую скорость истечения газов и соответственно бОльшие забрасываемый вес или дальность, но гораздо сложнее, дороже и капризнее, ракета больше по длине, большее время подготовки к пуску и трудность его отмены (фактически после отмены начавшейся предпусковой подготовки ракета не боеспособна). .Твердотопливные проще хранить в боеготовом состоянии, они требуют меньше времени на подготовку. Но у них нет возможности управления тягой двигателя - двигатель включается сразу на полную мощность и работает до полной выработки топлива.
@@ayannasir6653 Solid fuel is a lot simpler (_but_ you have to be able to correctly cast the large fuel blocks without _any_ bubbles or fissures, which is an art in itself), can be stored for a long time and is almost immediately ready. Once ignited, burns to completion at full power (no throttle control) - which for an ICBM is generally not an issue. Liquid fuel gives you more performance (== heavier throw weight), but is massively more complex, lots of moving parts (e.g. pumps) and plumbing. Cryogenic fuels are a non-starter (imaging expecting your enemy to give you a few hours warning before nuking you so you can fuel your ICBM ... right), so the standard storable liquid propellant is UDMH (Hydrazine) for fuel and N2O4 as oxidizer - fuel your missile and store it ready to launch for _some_ time. That fuel mix is hypergolic (ignites on contact), which is nice for reliability. Both components are very, very nasty to unprotected humans (as in: tries very hard to kill you and gives you cancer if you happen to survive). Also, small mistakes/faults resulting in fuel leaks are very likely to result in the missile exploding ... US tends to go for small, precisely applied munitions, Russia for maximum boom in the general direction of the target, hence different priorities.
Well, the last time RS-28 Sarmat was tested it exploded inside its own silo, destroying not just the missile, but the infrastructure of the Launch Facility leaving a massive crater, so it is fair to wonder whether Russia's nuclear arsenal has deteriorated as heavily through incompetence and corruption as have the rest of the armed forces. The failed test was confirmed through satellite imagery and occurred at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome last month which adds to the stack of failures attributed to the missile such as failed flight tests, structural deficiencies, antiquated technology, and engine problems all which explain the catastrophic explosion in September. Not to outright dismiss the threat, Russia's stated military strengths have to be weighed against their actual performance and capabilities - the "World's Most Powerful ICBM" should first be able launch from its own territory and not destroy itself. At this point I would think RS-28 is something of a paper tiger and no threat to anyone outside Russia. The Russians do have other missiles, however, but again, one has to wonder at the state of their arsenal and whether it was as well maintained as the Navy or the Army.
in australia our media was saying every test failed to fly not saying thats true but i could imagine it being like they did many tests like space rockets and a few failed which is pretty much normal when developing new tech so sorry if i believed lies before
@@aleksandrpenerov5303 How is it "combat duty", despite the RS-28 rocket that destroyed its launch site was clearly still in the testing phase. Russia definitely has a tendency to declare system as operational, when they're clearly barely functional. Like the S-70 Okhotnik B drone they shot down, after they lost control of it over Ukraine.
@@georgikrachmarov6344 Lies. 4 tests succeeded and no prove of any tests failed. There was just one photo of destroyed silo near Plesetsk cosmodrome but with no any facts that it was related to Sarmat missile test
"It can reach targets anywhere on earth" - provided it doesn't blow up in the silo (recently), doesn't rapidly disassemble in flight (all but one of the test flights where it actually got airborne save one so far). So far, that missile is more dangerous to the launch country than to whatever it's aimed at.
That's why the US can't find OIL in Russia
No! That's why they can't bring democracy to Russia!
There's already oil😂😂
@@osondufuture101 have usa demokracy ? 🤔
@@osondufuture101 i was just thinking to write that and i saw ur msg hahaha
Lol rusian empire is old europian conqueror. But alway lose there war and run. 😂😂 lose to japan
😂😂
One of the reasons America has not found oil and human rights violations in Russia
It's funny, in the US itself citizens have not had any rights or freedoms for a long time, maybe Americans should discover this fact before worrying about Russia?
😂😂
@@amateuramateur250
Absolutely true 👌👌👌👍👍💯
They didn't take a drop in Iraq
@@amateuramateur250 🤣 tell me what's not free🤡? How come Russia arrest people for even filming video of destruction in Russia? Don't you dare mention the word war in Russia 🤣 the Russian people live in one big prison under their coward dictator 🤡
Yep, thats why no WMDs were found in russia😂
So that means everyone has to think not twice maybe ten times before taken slightest action against Russia Well that’s what I think
No my friend is not about think 2 or 10 times is just to think that if that thing is armed and in the air millions of people will die in the next 30 minutes and nobody can do nothing to stop it
That is to think about
@@claus86 Mr. Scott Ritter has always mentioned this that NO ONE wins in a nuclear war.
If the US used atomic bomb to end a war, Russia can also use its nuclear weapon to end a war even if no sides will win, does it even matter for Russia? I don't think so.
@@kdennis9115: Maybe Planet Earth wins. Planet Earth would be much better off without the billions of humans infesting it like a plague and making hundreds of other species extinct. Look at how the wildlife in Chernobyl thrived after all the humans left!
@@resulovayolu640 🤣 the amount the US spends a year solely maintaining its nuclear program Russia spends on its entire military budget 🤣 hate to break the news to you but Russia doesn't have half the operational nukes they claim to 🤣
Tells you how dangerous are ICBMs. Just pray these weapons are never used.
The reckless geopolitical games world leaders plays ensures that it will inevitably be used if not immediately.
Israel and Iran keep playing around, I bet we will find out
Просто молитесь, чтобы политики Запада закончили вооружать неонацистов на Украине.
What about praying for NATO to stop provoking Russia? Isn't it more sensible?
Already been used against Ukraine... if you didn't noticed.
goosebumps. Scary to know those weapons really exist and the destructive power it brings
To be clear:- Satan-2 is one of several new nuclear delivery systems Russia has developed with the aim of overcoming evolving U.S. missile defense capabilities. The silo-based weapon measures 3 meters in diameter, 35.5 meters long, and weighs 229 tons-making it the heaviest ICBM on the planet once it enters service.
The liquid-fueled missile boosts in three stages, allowing it to accelerate to a peak velocity exceeding 20 times the speed of sound as it arcs towards targets up to 6,800 to 11,000 miles away depending on payload. A successful test in April 2022 saw an RS-28 traverse roughly 3700 miles in 20 minutes-equating to an average speed of Mach 14.5, or over three miles per second.
The Satan-2’s “bus” can accommodate up to 10 tons of weapons including 10 to 16 separate nuclear warheads (known as Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles or MIRVs), which can spray out to accurately attack separate targets, multiplying the number threats a defense system has to overcome. A typical Russian heavy MIRV might have a yield equivalent to 750 kilotons, or 50 times more powerful than the Little Boy bomb dropped by the U.S. on Hiroshima, Japan in 1945.
Absolutely true 👌👌👌👍👍👍💯💯💯
What are you a nuclear engineer?
Thanks... what a specific education to learn in one minute..
Blah Blah, yawn...really , liquid fuel? No wonder they blow up in their launchers! Couldnt be arsed to read all your "sales pitch" guff mate
@@bikechainmic хрюкни, приятель
every country should have this - end to Americas endless wars and global chaos
Why, so they can have them explode on the ground during testing.
It doesn't fire it's engine in the silon, US ICBMs do that. It leaves the silo via cold launch ejection and only fires it's engines when its clear to avoid damaging the silo
wow
True...Russian icbms are all cold launched
OK, so it exploded in the silo. The result was the same.
@@TerryButterfield That's why they are called tests. there is a reason the Russians have the best missiles by far. No one comes even close.
@@SP1-media Yeah... I thought so. Wasn't the last version of the SS-18 cold launched too ?
This rocket never failed at launch. 4/4 from the testing trials. If this one gets launched, we are doomed.
What are you talking about? This missile had 3 complete failures and 1 partial success. Not a single full success.
While theyre messing around with old liquid fuels I am not bothered by their "sales pitch"
@@gintasvilkelis2544 it was Bulava that failed not Sarmat.
@@gintasvilkelis2544 1 is all it is needed anyway...so maybe people should not take as beeing safe...
btw afaik it had 1 failed lounch....
Tridend had 2 or 3 just in past 6 months
@@kalin3430 yes,but you know, it does not matter on internet if it is true or if it is false, they just need enough people to repeat it so it become the truth...on internet.
30 minutes is great
Pentagon Must be Watch this😮
Пентагону известна информация о каждой такой ракете, я уверен, все шахты, места базирования мобильных комплексов ракетоносителей, всё отслеживается со спутников, стоит только вылететь такой ракете уже через несколько секунд о ней будут здать в пентагоне, другой вопрос как эту ракету сбить
Yes, and Pentagon has seen that this missile so far has not had even a single 100% successful test. The Soviet ICBM expertise was located entirely within Ukraine, so it's been inaccessible to Russia since 2014.
@@gintasvilkelis2544 25% successful test rate (1 in 4).
No one country missile can intercept this sarmat icbm
russian had one new Icbm Avangard mach 27 that more is dangerous
Avangard is not standalone ICBM... It's a hypersonic glide vehicle mounted on an ICBM, like the RS-28. I am not sure if the RS-24 Yars can also be used to deliver the Avangard. Oh and don't forget the 2 Megaton nuclear payload the Avangard can carry (directly to Zelensky's front doorstep 😂😂)
Woooooow... It is a very well-educated and professional video in a few minutes .... Learn something here... thanks.
Did you learn about the RS-28 that blew up its lauch site last month, in September?
Спасибо большое за интересное видео 😊
Good news Russia have this
It's fascinating how the US didn't learn, but still keep provoking Russia. Whenever they has done a move to threaten Russia, Russia has came out of the situation much stronger. The same will happen now with Ukraine. Ukraine project was created to weaken Russia, but they weakened themselves 🤣
Lol yeah Russia looks really strong 😂😂😂😂
You sr are a moron. Thousands of russians dies every day in Ukraine.
@@GarWhittaker Более 50 стран прямо или косвенно воюют против России, а Россия даже 20% своих сил не задействовала
Тут важно понимать главное - Россия освобождает своих адекватных людей и исконно русские города на Украине. Поэтому бои ведут вдали от крупны городов, и поэтому русский город Киев не испарился в считанные минуты. Города стран НАТО Россия своими не считает.
@@GarWhittaker Копируем хронологию и вспоминаем почему проект украина прекращает своё существование
*Для тех, кто считает что в Украине НЕТ нацистов и фашистов! ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО К ПРОСМОТРУ*
*Артём Гришанов - Игрушки / Toys for Poroshenko / War in Ukraine (English subtitles)*
Итог:
*4 часа украинских кладбищ*
Well, it's like with the Vatican. for a long time they believed that the pope was the first and foremost on earth after God, but the problem is that the Orthodox patriarchs never recognized this, however, as did Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus. In China, by the way, it is called by locals Under heavenly, they believe that China is the center of the world, and everything else is its outskirts.So a similar hubris happened to the United States as to the Vatican
Oh, I enjoyed this video for sure . . .
Wow. The tech is leaked. I'm gonna make one soon. Thank you for the information. ☺️ 👍
Improper opinion 🤫
@@fredericksetuagbe4843
Prop Props Proper Properly Property 😉
Nothing they revealed is even remotely new..EXCEPT for the MARV re-entry vehicles.. And they are not new..another "magic decade" idea...but only just now being put on multiple warhead missiles. The Pershing -2 had a MARV warhead...in the late 80's..but it was a single RV missile.
@@Sta2200 blah blah blah😂😂😂
Russia❤️🔥
Pride of a nation
то что взорвалась на испытаниях. это радует. значит придумали, что то новое к ракете и испытывают. можно вспомнить как ракета с пл чуть не угробила министра обороны англии
Is this the rocket that exploded at launch?
That's the one
😂😂😂😂
Fake news from those who can not build missile like Sarmat
Yep that's the missile the West claimed exploded during launch, but I find it hard to trust Western narratives these days. Let's not forget, every country faces military accidents. Remember how the UK's nuke launching failed a few months ago? And the U.S. has had its share of mishaps too, like when their Minuteman III missile test failed
If I remember correctly, it failed 3/4 attempted launches.
Doesn’t it have to leave the launchpad without exploding to be called a threat.
Ох, мы столько всего можем сделать из стиральных машин)
I need some of these, hahaha
The Poseidon would be far more devastating !
Lol
Poseidon can devastate a port - but not a whole country. Poseidon can create a tsunami - but only a very small one compared to the Tohuku tsunami that hit Japan in 2011.
@@timonsolus? It makes that tsunami look like a ripple in a pond . Poseidons 100ft wall of water at 500mph which wipes out coasts . 350 times more damage than Hiroshima and makes the land radioactive ( uninhabitable)
@@pauldean8638 : Really? What’s the blast yield on Poseidon’s warhead then?
1,000 megatons? 10,000 megatons?
Slava Russia From India ❤
🎉Awesome!❤
Very
most powerful weapon is the russian military power ❤❤❤
Except that it doesn't work.
I Heard they want to use it on Ukraine just with regular warhead instead Nuclear, for testing, there is story for kinetic warheads also since it's very fast and falling from space....
Why use them when we have hypersonic missiles "Kinzhal" and missiles "Kalibr" with a range of 5,500 kilometers and the air defense of Ukraine is almost completely paralyzed?:) Don't believe the myths.
@@ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш
👌👌👌👍👍👍💯
Дороговата игрушка для демонстрации на украине. Для этого есть и более простые вещи. У каждого оружия своя специфика применения.
they so a beautyfull
I'm so glad that Russia shared their top secrets with you. Now we also know
Great
Wait, the warheads are impact detonated? Would there not be a larger blast radius if it was detonated at altitude? Also allowing for a larger EMP affected area?
You get more irradiated ash when you hit the ground from what l heard.
In a doomsday scenario, you want to cause as much long term harm as you can
@@alispeed5095 that's correct
Ты прав , от взрыва в воздухе область поражения значительно выше и это конечно учитывается.
From my heart I love russia god bless russia we africa love russia
I love africans and russians.🇷🇺♥️
Hey stop killing gorrilas over there!!!
@@MrTmenzo stupidy man in the world
Gorilla is food😂
More concerned for Gorillas than Palestinian lives?
Let's all hope these aren't ever used.
They won't, because they don't even fly. Out of five test launch attempts, 4 were unsuccessful, during one of them, the rocket exploded in the mine, leaving behind a 62-meter in diameter crater
@@thecapitalofmind Source: Just Trust me bro
@@thecapitalofmindоткуда такая информация бро?
It's not my prayer that they be used, but I am sure that one day, based on many factors, they will be used.
@@thecapitalofmind c ck
Good presentation. How about the pump systems invented by Germany to mix the fuel and oxidiser ? That control system?
Why can't the united state's name there ICBM's a cool evil name
Suggestions?
@@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh Yes: Google, Macron, Facebook, Israel, etc
Trident and Minuteman are decent names! But the B-52H Stratofortress is pretty cool!
@@horseshoemountainprojects8144 those names not evil, wicked, scary, dreadful, or chilling enough
Russian name is sarmat nato name is satan
The warheads need to be retrofitted to hypersonic glide vehicles or they will just get intercepted.
Good 👍
Я Искренне надеюсь что они Никогда не будут использованы.Люди Опомнитесь.Правительство США не доводите до греха.
This beast can carry UpTo 10ton🥶
😂😂😂😂 just make sure you build a under ground bunker because how things is shaping up all hell on earth will let loose😂😂😂😂
@@davidmangru3517 on what you are talking
@@davidmangru3517 on what you are talking
@@davidmangru3517 on what you are talking
Bro castle Bravo and tsar Bomba had the same things inside then why was tsar Bomba more powerful than castle Bravo
Castle bravo was intended to have a yield of 6 megatons, but turned out to be 15 megatons. Tsar bomba was intended to be 100 megatons, was downsized to 50 megatons and turned out to be 55 megatons.
Update the equipment….a new war room would make me feel better about the simulated World War 3 I saw back in 2016
Its so powerful I like it
Why doesnt any video say about speed of those missiles from taking off to hitting the target.
It did.
Turn your speakers on Mate!
Like Domino’s Pizza in the 80’s. Thirty minutes or less or the next one is free!
@evinduggins2431 🤬
The speed according to the documentation is 27000km/h, actually achieved during the test of 33000km/h. You can calculate the flight time to any point of the earth.
Putin should press that button if necessary
Не волнуйтесь, так и будет.
Мир без России нам не нужен)
И в правду говорят, Иванушка дурачок@@Иван_Иванович
@@nikitap.2140 И правду говорят: дурачок тот сви до мит, который к 2024 не смог гидну мову выучить)))
@@Иван_Иванович lol sarmat it can’t even leave launchpad 4 of 5 of the total launches have exploded
@@DirkDiggler-qp3vm Lol, now give me some proof from independent and neutral experts who would confirm your lies)))
Or did very "truthful SNN" tell you this? ;-)
Let's call it getting rich because it's fighting getting poor
You mean the missel that has had setbacks! So this missel was named after Putin?
What a name...cant win.
How many of these statements have hard evidence?
Думаешь есть смысл на себе проверить ???
💯
Well 2 have been launched in tests and both exploded. One never making it out of the silo. Not worried about it...
That's not unusal in testing and introduction phase. So engineering works.
Thank you for this this is our African guide for Europe 😅❤
Would love to see this over penthouse
*pentagon
How the RS-28 Sarmat 'Satan II' Works? Except for its first test flight, it doesn't. The last time they tried to launch it, it was quite spectacular as it blew up in its silo.
All test flights of Satan II were successful except one. New weapons can't be created without some problems. they are fixed.
That's not unusal in testing and introduction phase. So engineering works.
This rocket changes its trajectory in its flight. Not by ballistic trajectory but unpredicted trajectory.
Tambla Lempira , i finished defending problems.
The special gift from god to the west🙃🙃🙃
How come this video doesn't mention that Sarmat, so far, has not worked fully _even once?_
Заработат, уверяю. Идут испытыния и удаляют погрешности. Главное - она уже есть.
@@sergeistokmann4444 In the USSR, all the Soviet ICBMs were designed and manufactured in Ukraine. Now Russians don't know what they are doing, and it shows.
@@gintasvilkelis2544что ты знаешь о России? В СССР работали над оружием все институты страны, а на Украине размещали. А Украина сейчас патроны не может делать, ей со всех стран дают их. Вон, Илон Маск кучу своих ракет угробил, пока наконец полетела. А что Россия может делать и сделает - интернет тебе в помощь. А ты глупости великие пишешь или ты украинец.))
@@sergeistokmann4444 All Soviet ICBMs were made in Yuzhmash, in Ukraine. In 1991 Russia lost control of those facilities, and in 2014 Russia lost Ukrainians' willingness to collaborate on that technology. These days, North Korea is more capable than Russia.
@@sergeistokmann4444 Elon Musk's SpaceX isn't a national government. Yet his US-based company is clearly innovating more than Russia.
But it blows up on the pad, doesn’t it?
Defensive weapon that has to work, but should never be used
Is this "SATAN-II" ises liquid fuel or solid fuel?
Liquid fueled. It's basically a Russian rip-off of the R-36 which was designed by ... an Ukrainian company.
@@AlexanderSchreiber разрабатывалось всё русскими на Украине и не более.как только вы отвалились все технологии забрали и поэтому вы за 30 лет ничего сами не можете создать своего!
@AlexanderSchreiber So which category is better LIQUID FUEL rockets or SOLID FUEL rockets?
@@ayannasir6653 Жидкостные обеспечивают большую скорость истечения газов и соответственно бОльшие забрасываемый вес или дальность, но гораздо сложнее, дороже и капризнее, ракета больше по длине, большее время подготовки к пуску и трудность его отмены (фактически после отмены начавшейся предпусковой подготовки ракета не боеспособна). .Твердотопливные проще хранить в боеготовом состоянии, они требуют меньше времени на подготовку. Но у них нет возможности управления тягой двигателя - двигатель включается сразу на полную мощность и работает до полной выработки топлива.
@@ayannasir6653 Solid fuel is a lot simpler (_but_ you have to be able to correctly cast the large fuel blocks without _any_ bubbles or fissures, which is an art in itself), can be stored for a long time and is almost immediately ready. Once ignited, burns to completion at full power (no throttle control) - which for an ICBM is generally not an issue. Liquid fuel gives you more performance (== heavier throw weight), but is massively more complex, lots of moving parts (e.g. pumps) and plumbing. Cryogenic fuels are a non-starter (imaging expecting your enemy to give you a few hours warning before nuking you so you can fuel your ICBM ... right), so the standard storable liquid propellant is UDMH (Hydrazine) for fuel and N2O4 as oxidizer - fuel your missile and store it ready to launch for _some_ time. That fuel mix is hypergolic (ignites on contact), which is nice for reliability. Both components are very, very nasty to unprotected humans (as in: tries very hard to kill you and gives you cancer if you happen to survive). Also, small mistakes/faults resulting in fuel leaks are very likely to result in the missile exploding ... US tends to go for small, precisely applied munitions, Russia for maximum boom in the general direction of the target, hence different priorities.
Well, it has to escape the silo first.
considering their IBCMs are far superior technologically that anyone elses tells me you frequent western mainstream media
I don't care about their jokes.
We have that too😂
You don't have anything similar. You have only one type - Minutmen II - old outdated missile with just one warhead
Take your chances then and take a selfy when you see that mushroom cloud outside your window.
Well, the last time RS-28 Sarmat was tested it exploded inside its own silo, destroying not just the missile, but the infrastructure of the Launch Facility leaving a massive crater, so it is fair to wonder whether Russia's nuclear arsenal has deteriorated as heavily through incompetence and corruption as have the rest of the armed forces. The failed test was confirmed through satellite imagery and occurred at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome last month which adds to the stack of failures attributed to the missile such as failed flight tests, structural deficiencies, antiquated technology, and engine problems all which explain the catastrophic explosion in September. Not to outright dismiss the threat, Russia's stated military strengths have to be weighed against their actual performance and capabilities - the "World's Most Powerful ICBM" should first be able launch from its own territory and not destroy itself.
At this point I would think RS-28 is something of a paper tiger and no threat to anyone outside Russia. The Russians do have other missiles, however, but again, one has to wonder at the state of their arsenal and whether it was as well maintained as the Navy or the Army.
China has a similar missile. Usa doesn't.
What you mean is how it’s supposed to work. Anything Russian does has vodka in the middle
Acually they did 4 tests on Sarmat 2 were succesful hitting target 6000km and 2 failed
No
Plz help falastheen🇵🇸❤️
In a name it's fighting tyranny
Car bomba to przy tych rakietach,wyglada na jakąś petardę o małym zasiegu.
отличное видео
Love 💕 Russia from Pakistan 🥳🤗💕🥳🎉❤🇵🇰💕🇨🇵
Russia don't give loans to beggars 😂
Finally a Disney movie without singing
Сармат несет много средств преодоления противоракетной обороны...
in australia our media was saying every test failed to fly not saying thats true but i could imagine it being like they did many tests like space rockets and a few failed which is pretty much normal when developing new tech so sorry if i believed lies before
A wise men didn't show their secretly weapons like America ❤
This why the states invested in lasers but shh dont tell anybody 😂
Blyatiful Igor!!! 🇷🇺🔥🇷🇺🔥🇷🇺!!!!
Are those not Avant-garde hypersonics
Thats another system thats shorter range
Avangard... Not Avant-Garde
Reason for ending of world war 3 😂😂
We could use these to get to our nearest star but instead we point them at each other,these old men making decisions are really fkin us all
Skynet likes this video.
Good to know 😳😳😳😳😳
Which fule is use
Alfa
Now wait a minute just the other day they tried to test one and it blew up in The Silo what's up with that s***
That's not unusal in testing and introduction phase. So engineering works.
No wonder why the United States can’t find Oil and Gas in Russia.
Actually this rocket doesn’t pass the basic tests so far thus the video title is misleading.
В 2024 году эта ракета уже стоит на боевом дежурстве. Следи за новостями , или вам это "забыли" рассказать ?
@@aleksandrpenerov5303 How is it "combat duty", despite the RS-28 rocket that destroyed its launch site was clearly still in the testing phase.
Russia definitely has a tendency to declare system as operational, when they're clearly barely functional. Like the S-70 Okhotnik B drone they shot down, after they lost control of it over Ukraine.
It has passed all tests. All of them were successful except one.
@@AlexanderTch Last four tests failed. In Russia the military equipment first enters service then tests are performed.
@@georgikrachmarov6344 Lies. 4 tests succeeded and no prove of any tests failed. There was just one photo of destroyed silo near Plesetsk cosmodrome but with no any facts that it was related to Sarmat missile test
Are that War III .nearly
50 times but devided ,not at once ,i guess this is what they mean of tactical . to devide the yiled .
Very Dangerous bomb
Didn't this thing just blow up in the ground
Yes, it certainly did.
@@KSmithwick1989 They are still working out the kinks 😂
How can I get a few of them 😊
"It can reach targets anywhere on earth" - provided it doesn't blow up in the silo (recently), doesn't rapidly disassemble in flight (all but one of the test flights where it actually got airborne save one so far). So far, that missile is more dangerous to the launch country than to whatever it's aimed at.
А потом произошёл ураган Милтон в США да?
Its not a missile, its an insurance policy against intruders...
You forgot about decoys.
Bravooo Russia 👍👍👍💯💯💯
That missle was pointing to china