I don't want to piss on your PARADE, but you left out a SMALL (for you) big detail. Each head is SUBDIVIDED INTO SIX INDEPENDENT AMMUNITIONS. That's why in the videos you see a rain of fire or THIRTY-SIX KINETIC STRIKES..... I love RUSSIAN ENGINEERING outperforming the leading power in the block by DECADES???....
One main fact missed here.. Kinetic energy of a non-nuclear strike, like the one that was seen at Ukraine. The explosive charge destroys a lot of things around its point of impact. On the other hand, Kinetic energy goes INTO the ground or the object its hitting. All of it. Imagine an impact of thirtysix steel duds each in weight of 1,5 tonns, coming straight from above with hypersonic speed.. Into, lets say aircarrier, or an underground production site. It's basicly phuked right on the spot. That is what Russia showed the west by this strike. And all who understands the real mecanics of modern warfare got the message. The message was "We dont even need nukes to phuk your shit up. We can go oldscool, like theese 18 century cannons, and it will get the job done"
How the fuck can you discuss nuclear weapons if you can’t even handle elementary school math or master how to use Google? 54 tons (36 x 1.5) is the payload of a superheavy rocket (~starship), not an IRBM. What you’re referring to (the 1.5) is the hypothetical throw weight of everything contained within the “bus" stage of 'Hazelnut' system.
Energy does not go into the target. Most of it goes into breaking up and vaporizing the projectile. Think if a hammer, with hammer all energy is transferred and hammer is not deformed. Now take a hammer which weight s a few grams but comes at mach 5 and the energy is not transferred but used to vaporize the hammer instead.
Hi ! i think you are wrong 36x1,5 = 54 ton A payload like this is not realistic i am afraid Just think that the mighty Satan has a total payload of about 10 ton only One of the highest payolad around I still think that not using nuclear weapons is a silly thing Just think that the exact same cruise missiles with a ncuelar warhead can have the destructive power of up to HALF A MILLION missiles with a conventional warhead Are they stupid ? the answer is yes they are Better this is not a serious war This is a bloody game
@@gearloose703 Расскажи это челябинскому метеориту. когда он взорвался в атмосфере у меня в доме все стекла повылетали. давай весте подадим на метеорит в суд. ты судье будешь судье впаривать про молоток. а он с тебя посмеется!
@@Владимир-о2х8ю в дальше Украина теряет свою территорию за территорией. На убой хлопцы за доллары для зеленского. Он сбежит и будет жить, а вы будите прокленать всех на свете кроме себя
@IronMan-u2m they launched with empty warheads, as a warning to Ukraine not to do long range strikes. Russia notified the Pentagon in US, 30 mins before launching. Their shovels definitely works, but they meant to do no damage, for now.
For those who don't know, the Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky is the founder of cosmonautics, that is the science that deals with space technologies, and that same Russian scientist made the first designs for a rocket, a rocket engine, a space orbital station and a centrifugal machine used in the preparation of cosmonauts for space flight. Also, the Russians were the first to make a rocket, a space rocket, an artificial satellite, the first space probe, the first rover, the first space orbital station, etc. All best for brothers in Russia from sister-land Serbia!
@@--_-0_0-_-- He was Ukrainian as much as Alexander Zakharchenko was Ukrainian! In any case, if it were not for Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and other Russian scientists, the world would still not know about rockets, artificial satellites, space stations and other space technology.
So many lies in one comment. You know, we have a saying in Czech, that the russians are so far ahead, they are the first who managed to milk a male goat :)
9 метровые стержни из вольфрама , разогрев происходит от сопротивление аотмосферы там нагрев 3000 градумов , когда они рядом 6 снярядов падают , по кинетике создают волну удраную под землей , каждый снаряд друг о друга ловит волну ! , удара кинетики , и тем самым создается землетресение в 9 балов , по окраине города куда ударили по 404 , там по окраине города дома треснули .. стекла вылетили это за 20 км
No, here let me tell you what they ACTUALLY tell us: "Nah, Russia's nuclear rockets are all old leaking and rusted from the cold war era. They probably don't even have working nuclear rockets" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"the warhead was created according to an American project," but the Americans themselves have not yet managed to implement anything like this in reality. It's brilliant))))))))
Ну это как товарищ Пентьковский (был такой засранец партийный, который был прикреплен к научной группе, по разрабтке нового оборудования еще в 70-х в одно из НИИ - дословно из уст одного из группы разработчиков!) утащил разработки новой ЭВМ в америку и вдруг появился Пентиум.....!
Russia always have been way ahead of USA and it's Allies in all technological advances. Only difference is Russia didn't boast about it's weapons unlike US. because Russia does not promote its weapons for sale like US does. Way to Go Russia.👍
Most of Russias weapons are just plain bad. Every single weapon that Russia has produced is inferior to west made in the last 100 years. They might appear like advancing faster in some domains but that is because they don't care about quality and personel safety which means they release faster. This is expected though as Russia/Soviet were in an economic hell for a long time but this could change as in the last decade the economy has improved.
@@naibresoulew1pact in the field? Does it only look good on paper? It seems like a small drone with explosives attached to it using duct tape is more reliable than any weapon browser on the planet hahahaha
absolutely wrong. The "Hazel" combat complex has two options. kinetic and nuclear. The kinetic variant is essentially the first iteration of plasma weapons in human history. The launch vehicle is a smaller copy of the Sarmat rocket and it does not fly along a ballistic trajectory. The carriers (x6) of the warheads (x6) are reduced copies of the Avangard units. warheads - almost nothing is known about them. The approximate principle of operation of the kinetic variant is that the launch vehicle takes off and enters orbit almost vertically, then carriers with blocks are released that accelerate to hypersonic speed, setting the initial trajectory to the target and when entering the high layers of the atmosphere, they release warheads. The warheads are made of some new alloy that enhances plasma generation and holds a larger plasma cloud (than a "Dagger" for example). And why is everyone talking about Europe as a target ? Did you know that from Russia to L.A is less than 5000 km, to Washington less than 6000? The earth is not flat google map. lol.
@@西口公子 У этих идиотов мозгов не хватает что шутить не надо с Россией, им показали без ядерный вариант но может дождутся в ядерном исполнении, как Путин сказал клиент будет доволен от обоих вариантов. А тебе респект и уважение! Да каждый из 6 боеголовок по 6 суб-боеприпсов...
@西口公子 tell men honestly are you e an idiot? where did you get the information about the new material, if it was a cut version of Sarmat it would have it would fly longer, and these are not smaller Аvanguards because the arrival trajectory does not match and there is no launch accelerator there and there cannot be, because the warhead would knock down the guidance of other warheads with its launch impulse and because it is a cut-down version of the Yars, its maximum range is much less, a maximum of 3-4 thousand kilometers. it feels like you are a Kremlin bot and among the debris a heavy and large panel was found, most likely it was the warhead body, which completely eliminates any comments about these being small warheads or that they are made of some new material
@@Oryx_777 it is not working, eehhhh? Why dfo you thing that Ukraine locked down the target complex in Denpropetrovsk? No access to anyone? it was the largest Ukrainian aerospace complex left from Soviet times. Apparently nothing is left from it.
is like 36 railgun strikes , that defeat bunkers.. is a bunker buster weapon. that apparently hit NATO officers operating secretly in an underground base.. The area was closed for weeks after the attack.
Russia has not been able to achieve success in Ukraine for three years, it has suffered terrible damage and even with the help of North Korea, etc., it has not been able to succeed. Russia is desperately waiting for Trump to come. If the Democrats had won, Russia would not have been able to continue the war and in less than 4 He used to accept defeat and give up. Of course, maybe your age is less than 16 years old and the information on Talk is at the level of school, however, you can ask your teacher, he will help you.
@nahcho4llattlyatlettlie837 Russian military bases remained, and the whole world saw and remembers how the Americans fled, leaving everything behind escaping Afghanistan, Billy.
1:40 You lost me when you said the Warhead was based on America designs. How can it be based on America design when it's has 36 sub-warheads, that you forgot to mention that America designs have yet to demonstrate.
Как же мы без америки живем? Что ни сделаем все оказывается американские разработки. Даже если у американцев их нет 😂 Подлизнуть дяде сэму иначе забанят? 😂
If someone will claim they already have an operational anti-gravitation device, that actually works. The week after you guys will explain how exactly! 🤣Oreshnik is impressive and highly capable piece of weaponry, but right now only Russians know what-is-what and all the hows.
Орешники уже закончились. Что дальше? Сво по плану и орешник входил в план? Более мощный СССР рухнул после Афганистана на четвертый год, когда рухнет рфия после войны с Украиной или во время?
@@Владимир-о2х8ювсе по плану, территория Украины все меньше каждый день. Вы проигрываете, и проиграете в итоге, это уже очевидно всем. Вас просто распилят, вот что будет дальше!
@@Denis18273 Скорость продвижения асвабадителев 35 км/год.Скорость движения воинской коллоны-35 км/ЧАС.Вопрос знатокам:Сколько времени требуется доехать РОА до Киева?
They have already brought. This time is known as the saddest time in the history of Russia. The people were impoverished and starving. Total corruption, theft and drug addiction. During this time, Russia lost people comparable to the Second World War. Russia already had the "democracy" of the USA, and everyone remembers it very well, that's why they support Putin.
Oreshnik is also an educational system. It teaches NATO generals and little kids math by asking the question. What is 6 times 6? And how hot are 4000 °C?
@@tyrantonion6660 ... and yet you still have NATO and EU officials claiming that Russian army is "a joke" and that Russia is just "a huge gas station ⛽ with some nukes". Underestimating your opponent is the biggest favor that you can give to your opponent, especially when your opponent is Russia.
@matthewinnkeeper3538 Russia is a joke. I think NATO's biggest mistake all these years was thinking Russia was a military power. How wrong they were. 🤦
Basically the author's opinion. Also, lacks the basic nature of and why it is called the Oreshnik - each of the six reentry vehicles has six other sub-munitions as clearly seen in the demo impact photos. In that sense, a very wrong analyses indeed.
It’s literally just an icbm with conventional warheads. Imagine if the US decided to put HE warheads on their minuteman 3’s and tridents. Pretty stupid tbh and not impressive. More of a case of utilizing what you have to expand a capability that was already there to begin with.
Yup While americans and ukrainian says like why Russia is creating super expensive icbm These dudes think its expensive And from stats we know Russian weapon is strong and cheap
Ні, це МБР Кедр у якого зменшили злітну частину і збільшили бойову частину, тому він не може літати далеко і став ракетою середньої дальності. Тобто в основі це все ще МБР. Це доволі тупо.
Ні, це МБР Кедр у якого зменшили злітну частину і збільшили бойову частину, тому він не може літати далеко і став ракетою середньої дальності. Тобто в основі це все ще МБР. Це доволі тупо.
Меня умиляет этот мультик, где противоракета Пэтриота так бодро вылетает на встречу боевому блоку "Орешника", буд-то её скорость так же сверхзвуковая, и равна скорости Орешника, а Орешник достигает цели только лишь умением отклоняться и маневрировать. 😂. Да Пэтриот даже среагировать не успел при ударе по Южмашу. 😂
ПВО PATRIOT нет в Днепропетровской области, никто и не говорит что он должен сбивать такого рода ракеты, для этого существует THAAD, а от пустого "Орешника" заводу ЮЖМАШУ как то фиолетово :D жду комменты по типу "были поражены подземные цели, которых не видно со спутниковых снимков" ага, методичка быстренько сменилась, после того как показали спутниковые снимки невредимого завода... для бункеров и прочего нужны специальные противобункерные ракеты, ну или как минимум ядерная боеголовка, "кинетической" силы будет недостаточно
@@Hayabusa-c6p THAAD - это заатмосферный перехват. Когда есть возможность перехватить боеголовку целиком, до того, как произошло разделение на отдельные РГЧ. А теперь представь, если разделение РГЧ произойдет вне пределов эффективного поражения THAAD. Много он наловит РГЧ, да к тому же маневрирующих, в атмосфере?
@@Hayabusa-c6p а почему вы так уверены, что нет доказательств? На обнародованных видео болванки приходят под разными углами относительно земли (близкими к 90⁰), если посмотрите, ну например опубликованные фотографии прилета боевых блоков того же Минитмен 3, там будет совсем другая картина. Угол столкновения болванки Минитмена 3 с землёй около 45-70⁰.
@@Hayabusa-c6p какие ракеты,ты чего ? аристович сказал же что ракеты кончились! разве он может врать ? ) а если серьезно -никаких доказательтв того что южмаш не пострадал. но есть презентация мин обороны, о возможностях блоков
Ребят, представьте. Это было сделано со стиральных машин обычных. Дайте нам чего по круче, холодильники там, или микроволновки мы покажем вам "Кузькину мать"!
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
Lmao I watched a video were this guy talks about how old Russian missiles are their infrastructure is destroyed. They have old planes have old choppers. They have everything old he said 😂😂😂. I live in Texas. The infrastructure here in Texas is horrible everything is old. Everything is falling apart their electric electricity lines suck.
And yet, not a single radar can see a hypersonic missile because its body is in plasma during flight. Not a single radar will be able to see and not a single air defense will be able to intercept hypersound when a missile flies at a speed of 3 km/sec.
It can be seen, that's why Russia told the Americans they will launch an Oreshnik to Ukraine, to not wage a nuclear war when NORAD sees the missile. Get your facts right!
00:50 ~"and is filled with sollid fuel." *shows to tanks for liquid fuel* Edit: I dont know where the rest of my comment went... He also talked about reaching orbit and later says max range: if it could reach orbit, it would be able to reach anywhere. And 3rd: He talks about spin spin thrusters and tht is able to manouver: if the mass was equally distributed and it points streight ahead in flight it could not manouver with just spin thrusters. It would need to have an offset mass, a movable mass insight ot it has to have manouvering thrusters. Those two point where missing from my comment. Weird.
American design? A lot of beats you missed there. We saw the video, bro. Every of the 6 warheads holds another 6 warheads. So one rocket delivers 36 warheads. And the purpose of the Oreshnik is to be a CONVENTIONAL vehicle for strategic deterrence. They don't need nuclear warheads. They used kinetic energy impact. For now. To level a NATO airfield, you need a minimum of 100 conventional rockets. Oreshnik will do the job with 4. A big cost optimization. Stop playing with fire and go to your Representative and push for restoring global peace.
@@jnievele Lookup MIT professor Ted Postol analysis. The first one. And stop with this propaganda bullshit already. In the original video is visible if you count.
The people who've watched the CCTV footage of the 36 thunderbolts need no further explanation of what this missile is capable of. Is it mere coincidece the CCTV was there to capture the blitz? Probably the most uploaded footage of anything ever.
From captured components, it seems to create plasma during its descent and generates lightning strike when the warhead(s) hit the ground. Russia has been known for its electromagnetic expertises.
@@pramuanchutham7355that's why 1 russia is making 'alabuga' 2 american scientist say that it was russia who changed electromagnetic field of earth and send milton to them
@@ViktorSmirnov-qj3fg ты ещё скажи что смеялись над Димой Семицветовым, тормоз. Я тебе про несуществующий Орешник, а не про крылатую ракету. Ты поверил в 4 мультика 21 ноября, значит убогий именно ты.
@@Владимир-о2х8ю как закончились?! То есть это были не мультики с Мосфильма? Больной, вы делаете успехи, стадию отрицания вы похоже преодолели. Теперь стадия "торг" - этот орешник был последний 😆😆😆
"Американской разработки...."?! Ну это как товарищ Пентьковский (был такой засранец партийный, который был прикреплен к научной группе, по разрабтке нового оборудования еще в 70-х в одно из НИИ - дословно из уст одного из группы разработчиков!) утащил разработки новой ЭВМ в америку и вдруг появился Пентиум.....
@@corbanavar4700 Что сразу не 4. Не льстите американцам. Это было тогда когда ещё вас в проекте не было! 70-е годы, тогда был ещё даже не ПК, а ЭВМ в размер с огромный спортзал!
@АленаСеверная-л4я ЭВМ был ещё в сорокавых.А историю Пентковского и Бориса Бабаяна(его напарника по Эльбрусу) я знаю от и до.Интел существует с шестидесятых годов и процессоры выпускал с 1971 года.Пентковский помог действительно решить сложные задачи,но он начал работать в США только в 1993 году над пентиум 3
lmao who cares, they keep making these missiles very cost efficient while each murican rocket costs shitload of money and this eventually causes ukraine to lose - west simply has no money to support them anymore
Ah physics, what a wonderful subject. Hypersonic terminal speed cannot be achieved by gravity, even if hypersonic from space. There is simply too much drag in the atmosphere. The warheads must have thrusters and heat shields. The terminal velocity alone cannot provide enough energy to penetrate but a shielded molten blob at 4000 degrees sure helps. Ever heard of penetrating shaped charges? That's the sort of tech you see with Oreshnik. Normal ballistic missiles slow down before delivery.
They didn’t tell you that the warhead flies in the plasma around it, it feels no resistance. The Russians have created a metal that does not melt at 3000 degrees and at the same time all the electronics on board work.
@@mistermuhutya2583 В космосе можно разгоняться свободно, поскольку там нет сопротивления воздуха, соответственно и влететь в атмосферу можно тоже на очень большой скорости, но если скорость входа в атмосферу будет слишком большая, этот воздух покажется по прочности как бетон. Чтобы пролететь всю атмосферу на достаточно большой скорости, нужна идеальная аэробаллистическая форма, прочность сравнимая с вольфрамом и достаточная масса.
@@onega23 форма как раз может оказаться не столь важна, если вокруг создана плазма. А масса, вообще то передаваемая энергия, это масса + энергия, то есть скорость.
Who cares, its exactly the same tech only the range change, and Russia also have tons of ballistic missiles that can reach over 10,000 km up to 20,000 km
Не будет агрессивной политики Америки и Европы против России, тогда не будет и всяких Орешников и прочих. Русские очень справедливый народ и не терпит двойных стандартов и ущемления традиционных человеческих ценностей. А кто хочет мирно поговорить, спросить, или обсудить что-то - пишите, с удовольствием поговорю и объясню точку зрения.
У тебя кишка тонка мирно говорить. Отвечай, откуда на Украине бензин и соляра для гражданской и военной техники ? Традиционная человеческая ценность это правда, русский народ терпит бесконечную ложь, в том числе и про Орешник, и про Крокус и про что угодно. Агрессивная политика США и Европы, это такой же сценический понос, как например награды Адама Кадырова.
@ПовелительПроторуссов думал что у русских есть ум, но не ошибся, как выяснилось ума нет от слова совсем. Россия страна -ТЮРЬМА в которой население отбывает пожизненное заключение.
For people wondering "36 warheads", the missile itself only have 6 warheads, but every single warhead have 6 submunition for conventional explosive like cluster b0mb.
W R O N G !!!!! THE SUB MUNITIONS ARE NOT LIKE CLUSTER BOMBS , THE HAVE NO EXPLOSIVE , THEY ARE ALL HYPERSONIC PROJECTILES ...... Do some real research.
36 warheads. Then what is the kinetic energy of each? And the second question: maybe all 36 warheads have penetrating power? Or did the warheads simply disintegrate in the last section, and therefore it seems that each of the 6 warheads has submunitions???
@@КешаБурундук it would be pointless if the warhead disintegrated. if your warhead is conventional explosives, there is a limit to the speed it can go without burning up in the atmosphere from the friction. but you can go higher mach speeds if you use a kinetic warhead - no explosives just a solid projectile made from tungsten alloy, that can handle the heat, up 3500 C. higher speeds make it harder / impossible to intercept. But at even more speed eventually any material will burn up, so more MACH is not always better, there are limits when you are in atmosphere.
@@hindugoat2302 more mach is always better. The submunitions all have mass and when paired with that velocity, will impart extreme energy to the targets. And from video evidence, they clearly didn't burn up before reaching Pivdenmash. I'm very curious to know the extent of damage done to it, but I guess we'll have to wait till the end of the war to hear the truth.
@@КешаБурундукв ней не было боеголовок, в ней были только металлические болванки , возможно вольфрамовые. Они прилетели с максимально возможной скоростью с какой может прилететь метеорит из космоса.
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
As far as we know and for what we saw in first launch there are 6 primary head and those 6 warheads each one divided in 6 which make a total of 36 individual warheads!!! I assume that you just didn't freak out people.
Dont worry, bro. We wont use it against clever and wise countries. We're russians. We're for peace always. Just dont be a threat to us, talk with us and listen to us, like we are listening to you. Peace to you, bro, from Russia with true love, wherever are you from.😊
Так орешники уже закончились, смысл бояться чего уже нет. Могучая России начала сво и запланировала на 10 или 20 лет и орешник тоже по плану. Развал и крах рфии тоже по плану как и СССР после Афганистана или раньше?
@@Владимир-о2х8ю По списку ваша очередь разваливаться, а мы подождём и с удовольствием посмотрим этот захватывающий процесс, вот только попкорном запасёмся.
This missile is not a strategic missile; it is an intermediate-range missile. It does not go into space. Its engines accelerate to speeds of Mach 10-12. It climbs to an altitude of 100 km and from there dives towards the target, constantly accelerating. At some point, the warhead section splits into 6 controllable blocks, which in turn divide into 6 more combat devices. 36 combat projectiles fly to their destination, maneuvering. The temperature reaches 4000°C. The temperature is similar to that on the surface of the sun. Within the kinetic impact radius, everything (metal, organic matter, etc.) breaks down into elementary particles. Nothing remains. Thus, by playing with the precision of the strike, you can achieve the effect of a nuclear bomb attack without radioactive contamination of the surrounding area. Western analysts have perfectly calculated the approach time of this missile. And these are minutes to any target within its range. We are faced with a fundamentally new weapon, comparable only to a nuclear charge, but without the side effects associated with radiological contamination of the area. Russia is creating an entire line of these weapons: with a flight time of 3 minutes. People in the West seem not to understand the significance of this new Russian weapon due to all the Western propaganda they are being flooded with. This new missile is a conventional weapon that has the same destructive power as a tactical nuclear weapon without being a nuclear weapon, without producing the radiation, without the mushroom cloud, and without the political backlash of using a nuclear weapon. The structure it destroyed in Ukraine was just massive. It was literally the size of a small city. To destroy such a city or such a massive structure like that missile destroyed would have required at least a small tactical nuclear weapon before. Not with this new weapon. The issue here is that nuclear weapons cannot be used unless you want to commit suicide, become internationally isolated, and deal with radiation. But with this new weapon, you don't have to worry about any of that. Now Russia has a weapon that can destroy an entire city without using a nuclear weapon. Now I want to ask you a question. What do you think this means for all NATO military installations, naval, army, and air force bases or any mass concentration of troops in Europe and parts of the United States? What do you think will happen if NATO tries to mobilize any large number of troops and equipment anywhere in Europe or the Western United States to fight against Russia? Prior to the existence of this new weapon, Russia would have had to use nuclear weapons to destroy NATO armies. Not with this weapon. Plus, Russia could use multiple missiles carrying this weapon and target the same location with multiple missiles. Eventually, Russia will make a submarine version, and then all of the continental United States will be within its reach. Then, every U.S. army, naval, air force, industrial, economic, political, and population center will be within reach of this destructive weapon. Russia is now in the same position as the United States was between 1945 and 1949 when the U.S. was the only country with nuclear weapons in the world. Russia now has a weapon so powerful it changes the rules of the game. They literally have a weapon with the power of a nuclear weapon that is not a nuclear weapon.
They are def not maneuverable. They would have to remain at low(ish) altitude for most of the flight for that, which would be incompatible with their near vertical impact. Oreshnik is a traditional IRBM that was simply used at near its minimum range, hence it was lobbed extremely high to come down near vertically. Also, you aren't going to fit 36 maneuvering warheads in a road mobile missile. The control surfaces needed to maneuver take up way too much space.
The spin nozzles on the rear of the RV are used to "impart spin" as it leaves the Bus. The spin stabilizes the RV so that it flies straight like a bullet from a rifle, and does not tumble. The Bus maneuvers and deploys the RVs at the correct launch point and direction. As far as terminal guidance, or maneuvering during the terminal phase of flight, I think the Russians are not releasing information on that technique.
And the faster the MIRV goes, the harder it is to give it guidance other than inertial navigation, as the high speed will turn the air in front of the warhead to plasma from pressure and friction. Plasma unfortunately doesn't allow any electromagnetic frequency through, so both optical and radar targeting would be blocked.
@@king_Joah Дальнось баллистических ракет средней дальности - от 1000 до 5500 км. Дальность межконтинетальных баллистических ракет - от 5500 км и дальше. Дальность баллистических ракет меньшей дальности - от 500 до 1000 км. Дальность тактических баллистических ракет - от 50 до 500 км
Interesting is, that the one fired into the city of Dnipro last month didn't damage that much there. Iskander cruise missile is much more effectiv, if they make it into the target. Mostly every rocket is taken down by german Gepard tank or Patriot antimissile system. The only cities are in danger when they are near the border to Russia, because the time of identification and defense is to short.
This should be marked as HIGHLY SPECULATIVE VIDEO. Also: all ballisic missiles of sufficient range are hypersonic and thrusters on Mirv are for stbilisation, not manouvering. Oreshnik is not ICBM - that's IRBM.
@@thule505Neither side is immune from propaganda and propaganda is not a bad thing. Both the Russian and western governments use propaganda to get the support of their people - politics is a game of propaganda especially due to the invention of nukes no countries will actually go to war
Ну не надо с России ссориться, никогда и никому, не надо будить медведя! Не надо НАТО расширяться в нашу сторону и всё ХОРОШО! Украина неужели не понимала, что Россия очень против, но даже сейчас Украина стремится в НАТО и Россия уничтожит Украину из-за этого!!
I'm not sure you understand warhead undocking correctly. They don't fall to the ground at the same time. Rather, they detach one at a time with a slight delay, like from a Colt drum.
Да он вообще не чего не понимает..он говорит что они просто падают и набирают скорость..а в реале там есть ещё ракета которая им даёт разгон до самых слоев атмосферы.поэтому и называется 1x6x6
Very interesting video, but there is one thing. 6 parts with 6 warheads. It was one missile😅 what was the point of launching 6 missiles with an empty warhead?)
This wasn't a great video; it completely missed the reason which made Oreshnik so lethal; Each of the 6 war heads carrie another SIX war heads; in total THIRTY-SIX war heads rains down on target with mach 12, making it not 'very difficult', but impossible to intercept with current systems. As seen on the security camera video that captured Oreshnik attack in Ukraine, warheads were made of tungsten like exotic material, impact of 6 waves of 6 meteor like rods with devastating accuracy crates power roughly equivalent 1,5 tons of high explosive purely with kinetic energy, creating temperatures around 3000 celcius. This turns everything into dust in the instant impact vicinity of each of the 36 rods, making it the perfect weapon to take out Nato military infrastructure, especially airfields and bunkers. What Nato has terrifyingly realised, is that with hundred or so of these missiles, Russia now has the capability to completely wipe out all of European military infrastructure and airfields without sophisticated plans that require multiple stealth aircraft, or use of nuclear weapons. From Kamchatka, Oreshnik can already reach the territory around West Coast of the US, and obviously its a matter of time before before full coverage is achieved. Its the perfect first strike weapon.
Absolutely 100% correct. You have identified the exact reason why this missile was built and that NATO simply does not understand that they can cripple their military infrastructure in so many ways to make them completely defenceless.
That these are nuclear capable and are ballistic missiles means they could not be used as a first strike weapon. There would be no way for NATO to know that they are conventional, thus their use against NATO targets might very well prompt a nuclear response. If these things get launched at the mainland US, within an hour St. Petersburg and Moscow will exist only in history books. Russia knows this. NATO and the US knows this, yet the Russians keep insisting that these are actually viable weapons outside of a nuclear exchange.
People in the West seem not to understand the significance of this new Russian weapon due to all the Western propaganda they are being flooded with. This missile is not a strategic missile; it is an intermediate-range missile. Its engines accelerate to speeds of Mach 10-12. It climbs to an altitude of 100 km and from there dives towards the target, constantly accelerating. At some point, the warhead section splits into 6 controllable blocks, which in turn divide into 6 more combat devices. 36 combat projectiles fly to their destination, maneuvering. The temperature reaches 4000°C. The temperature is similar to that on the surface of the sun. Within the kinetic impact radius, everything (metal, organic matter, etc.) breaks down into elementary particles. Nothing remains. Thus, by playing with the precision of the strike, you can achieve the effect of a nuclear bomb attack without radioactive contamination of the surrounding area. Western analysts have perfectly calculated the approach time of this missile. And these are minutes to any target within its range. We are faced with a fundamentally new weapon, comparable only to a nuclear charge, but without the side effects associated with radiological contamination of the area. Russia is creating an entire line of these weapons: with a flight time of 3 minutes. This new missile is a conventional weapon that has the same destructive power as a tactical nuclear weapon without being a nuclear weapon, without producing the radiation, without the mushroom cloud, and without the political backlash of using a nuclear weapon. The structure it destroyed in Ukraine was just massive. It was literally the size of a small city. To destroy such a city or such a massive structure like that missile destroyed would have required at least a small tactical nuclear weapon before. Not with this new weapon. The issue here is that nuclear weapons cannot be used unless you want to commit suicide, become internationally isolated, and deal with radiation. But with this new weapon, you don't have to worry about any of that. Now Russia has a weapon that can destroy an entire city without using a nuclear weapon. Now I want to ask you a question. What do you think this means for all NATO military installations, naval, army, and air force bases or any mass concentration of troops in Europe and parts of the United States? What do you think will happen if NATO tries to mobilize any large number of troops and equipment anywhere in Europe or the Western United States to fight against Russia? Prior to the existence of this new weapon, Russia would have had to use nuclear weapons to destroy NATO armies. Not with this weapon. Plus, Russia could use multiple missiles carrying this weapon and target the same location with multiple missiles. Eventually, Russia will make a submarine version, and then all of the continental United States will be within its reach. Then, every U.S. army, naval, air force, industrial, economic, political, and population center will be within reach of this destructive weapon. Russia is now in the same position as the United States was between 1945 and 1949 when the U.S. was the only country with nuclear weapons in the world. Russia now has a weapon so powerful it changes the rules of the game. They literally have a weapon with the power of a nuclear weapon that is not a nuclear weapon.
please don't ask this, please. You can figure out the topic yourself, the main thing here is to understand what his problem is. If anything, I can explain everything point by point. If you ask him, you will get information that is torn away from many factors that are very important!
@@Aitelly It was a good video but you made the most critical mistake The 6 MIRV carries 6 sub-warheads making it 6x6 =36 that’s why we saw 6 strikes each with 6 warheads landing .
The description given is the one for classic ICBMs the Oreshnik has 6x6 kinetic warheads as it is shown in the original video, Scott Ritter who's an expert in ballistics and nukes gave a brilliant explanation, have a check !
I heard that each MIRV had six little warheads for over 30 cluster munitions each traveling at mach 11. In the attack on the Ukrainian factory complex these missiles produced the kinetic effect of a battlefield nuke and absolutely erased the square mile factory and its underground facility. I know it probably has several loadouts but I'd be interested in finding out how accurate that assessment was. Great use of Maya as always.
@@--_-0_0-_-- That's interesting. The video I saw didn't have a huge explosion. It was easier to get accurate news about war in WW1. I hate to tell you this. But Ukraine has propaganda too.
There was literally minimal damage reported and the empty canisters were recovered from the first "demonstration". What in the propaganda hell are you reading.
@@AzaIndustries I'm just seeking the truth. Nothing in that ugly reply you gave helps in that regard. You should learn some manners and be more respectful.
While this vid is interesting, I do not think all of the info is correct. The test missile did (clearly) not contain any nuclear warheads! In fact it appears to have been: 6 MIRV packages that each contained 6 kinetic warheads. So 36 projectiles in all (the videos seem to support this). Now I suspect that it can be configured to have 6 MIRV each of which has a nuke - but that is **not** what we saw. There is some speculation about the precise nature of the 36 warheads - were they entirely kinetic, or was there a shaped charge type of thing? Or even exotic metals to produce a downward vaporisation cone upon impact? No idea ATM - I suspect the silence from Russia is deliberate. We may find out more if they deploy another one. One other nit - I do not believe this classes as an ICBM, it is INF type missile (the vid states the range that clearly is in the ballpark).
Good video. You covered the Iskander too. Well done But Oreshnik is an IMRBM, not ICBM. Hypersonic objects are not clearly visible to radars and so cannot be homed or shot down
You are technically correct about hypersonic objects not being visible, but not in a way that matters. The plasma sheath hides the object itself, so usually radars can't detect the object. That said, the plasma sheath is extremely energetic, and not only shows up very clearly on radar, but actually emits radiation, meaning there is a chance that an RWR could detect it passively. Hypersonic missiles are not stealthy for any practical purpose.
Please take a look at the intelligence update about Oreshnik. The Oreshnik, who was supposdely fired at Dnipro on 2024/11/21 was in reality a 14 years old RS-26 Rubesh. Oreshnik is also furthermore still in test phase. with only 2 real test starts.
This video is full of self-contradictions. Solid 1st stage - showing clearly liquid fuel engine; Cold launch - later stating it's launched from the tube by it's first stage..
It has 6 buses that each carry 6 warheads. That makes a total of 36 independent war heads! The missile than hit Ukraine was only a single missile and you could see 6 sets of hits with 6 warheads each!
We also made the B2 Spirit BombeSpirit ruclips.net/video/r7BTJSiUejQ/видео.html Please take a Look
American design? Show us...
а 35 не летают а если летают то как топор!
@@Aitelly GRANDE RUSIA HURRA HURRA HURRAAA 🇷🇺
I don't want to piss on your PARADE, but you left out a SMALL (for you) big detail. Each head is SUBDIVIDED INTO SIX INDEPENDENT AMMUNITIONS. That's why in the videos you see a rain of fire or THIRTY-SIX KINETIC STRIKES..... I love RUSSIAN ENGINEERING outperforming the leading power in the block by DECADES???....
😂😂😂😂😂
One main fact missed here.. Kinetic energy of a non-nuclear strike, like the one that was seen at Ukraine. The explosive charge destroys a lot of things around its point of impact. On the other hand, Kinetic energy goes INTO the ground or the object its hitting. All of it. Imagine an impact of thirtysix steel duds each in weight of 1,5 tonns, coming straight from above with hypersonic speed.. Into, lets say aircarrier, or an underground production site. It's basicly phuked right on the spot. That is what Russia showed the west by this strike. And all who understands the real mecanics of modern warfare got the message. The message was "We dont even need nukes to phuk your shit up. We can go oldscool, like theese 18 century cannons, and it will get the job done"
@@Vfox9353 100%
How the fuck can you discuss nuclear weapons if you can’t even handle elementary school math or master how to use Google?
54 tons (36 x 1.5) is the payload of a superheavy rocket (~starship), not an IRBM.
What you’re referring to (the 1.5) is the hypothetical throw weight of everything contained within the “bus" stage of 'Hazelnut' system.
Energy does not go into the target. Most of it goes into breaking up and vaporizing the projectile. Think if a hammer, with hammer all energy is transferred and hammer is not deformed. Now take a hammer which weight s a few grams but comes at mach 5 and the energy is not transferred but used to vaporize the hammer instead.
Hi ! i think you are wrong 36x1,5 = 54 ton A payload like this is not realistic i am afraid
Just think that the mighty Satan has a total payload of about 10 ton only One of the highest payolad around
I still think that not using nuclear weapons is a silly thing Just think that the exact same cruise missiles with a ncuelar warhead can have the destructive power of up to HALF A MILLION missiles with a conventional warhead
Are they stupid ? the answer is yes they are Better this is not a serious war This is a bloody game
@@gearloose703 Расскажи это челябинскому метеориту. когда он взорвался в атмосфере у меня в доме все стекла повылетали. давай весте подадим на метеорит в суд. ты судье будешь судье впаривать про молоток. а он с тебя посмеется!
"Based on american designs", but america doesn't have one yet, ok))
😅
MIRVs are American, going back in the 60’s.
The MIRV (+ decoy) is an American invention. There is also no proof that the Oreshnik is an entirely new design.
@@77advanced 🤣🤣
@@Дим-д3щ They are hatin bro
Мы тут, в России, сами ещё много не знаем, а тут уже знаток мультик нарисовал. 😂
Все орешники закончились, что дальше?
@@Владимир-о2х8ю в дальше Украина теряет свою территорию за территорией. На убой хлопцы за доллары для зеленского. Он сбежит и будет жить, а вы будите прокленать всех на свете кроме себя
Он тут просто воду намутил. Типа смотрите, ракета стартует и разделяется! Как буд-то это какая-то уникальная инфа.
Да вам по ушам ездят , дорогая хлопушка с нулевым выхлопом . Она никакую задачу не решает . Я был в 2км от южмаша по которому стреляли . Хлопушка .
@@Владимир-о2х8ю дальше победа братан!)
Best shovel design of the century
Your so funny
brought to you by...The Gas Station 😅
@IronMan-u2m they launched with empty warheads, as a warning to Ukraine not to do long range strikes. Russia notified the Pentagon in US, 30 mins before launching. Their shovels definitely works, but they meant to do no damage, for now.
@IronMan-u2m Russias aim was to prove that western/NATO air defense are no match for their flying shovels.
@@RandomDude_Z but it vaporized the 5-story missile-making building, didn't it?
For those who don't know, the Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky is the founder of cosmonautics, that is the science that deals with space technologies, and that same Russian scientist made the first designs for a rocket, a rocket engine, a space orbital station and a centrifugal machine used in the preparation of cosmonauts for space flight. Also, the Russians were the first to make a rocket, a space rocket, an artificial satellite, the first space probe, the first rover, the first space orbital station, etc. All best for brothers in Russia from sister-land Serbia!
А украинец Сергей Королев отправил ракету с человеком в космос.
@@--_-0_0-_--
He was Ukrainian as much as Alexander Zakharchenko was Ukrainian! In any case, if it were not for Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and other Russian scientists, the world would still not know about rockets, artificial satellites, space stations and other space technology.
@@--_-0_0-_-- да, строго говоря, нужно писать не Русский или Украинский, а советский человек (гражданин)
@@--_-0_0-_-- Давно детские портки снял ? А можа кастрюля мозги давит , деятельность онного нарушила ?
So many lies in one comment. You know, we have a saying in Czech, that the russians are so far ahead, they are the first who managed to milk a male goat :)
The problem is, nobody truly knows how Oreshnik really operates. This animation is speculative at best.
@@irinbon6207 this is true
This is the case for many military nuclear hardware
Поддержу. Можно начать с комплекса "Искандер".
9 метровые стержни из вольфрама , разогрев происходит от сопротивление аотмосферы там нагрев 3000 градумов , когда они рядом 6 снярядов падают , по кинетике создают волну удраную под землей , каждый снаряд друг о друга ловит волну ! , удара кинетики , и тем самым создается землетресение в 9 балов , по окраине города куда ударили по 404 , там по окраине города дома треснули .. стекла вылетили это за 20 км
Fact
Meanwhile the west to it's people: Relax guys.. it was just made out of washing machine..
Yes. The microwave has a good countdown chip.
@@SergeyZZZ1977 у меня взяли чип с мойщика окон, он даёт иногда, полную непредсказуемость движения!)
No, here let me tell you what they ACTUALLY tell us:
"Nah, Russia's nuclear rockets are all old leaking and rusted from the cold war era. They probably don't even have working nuclear rockets"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@VenkiCodes The west is still asking is a man with a penis a men? Him/they
@@Eitachi5656дальше так думайте
"the warhead was created according to an American project," but the Americans themselves have not yet managed to implement anything like this in reality. It's brilliant))))))))
Ну это как товарищ Пентьковский (был такой засранец партийный, который был прикреплен к научной группе, по разрабтке нового оборудования еще в 70-х в одно из НИИ - дословно из уст одного из группы разработчиков!) утащил разработки новой ЭВМ в америку и вдруг появился Пентиум.....!
@@pappazoll 🤣
Не надо врать, сама америка живёт чужими мозгами, а у школа своя, и вашего там не ночевало трепачи
If you are so knowledgable, then explain what exactly about this missile is so innovative.
@@ColdMarty КИНЕТИЧЕСКОЕ оружие -гугли .Может грамотным станешь.
Russia always have been way ahead of USA and it's Allies in all technological advances. Only difference is Russia didn't boast about it's weapons unlike US. because Russia does not promote its weapons for sale like US does. Way to Go Russia.👍
Очень приятно, что есть такие люди на западе как вы! Что понимаете все. Дай бог вам здоровья и мира во всем мире. Россия не агрессор.
Most of Russias weapons are just plain bad. Every single weapon that Russia has produced is inferior to west made in the last 100 years. They might appear like advancing faster in some domains but that is because they don't care about quality and personel safety which means they release faster. This is expected though as Russia/Soviet were in an economic hell for a long time but this could change as in the last decade the economy has improved.
@@naibresoulew1 You're not the one who can tell about personel safety, lol
@@ecTb4oYT Russia IS the agressor! Who invaded Ukraine?
@@naibresoulew1pact in the field? Does it only look good on paper? It seems like a small drone with explosives attached to it using duct tape is more reliable than any weapon browser on the planet hahahaha
absolutely wrong. The "Hazel" combat complex has two options. kinetic and nuclear. The kinetic variant is essentially the first iteration of plasma weapons in human history. The launch vehicle is a smaller copy of the Sarmat rocket and it does not fly along a ballistic trajectory. The carriers (x6) of the warheads (x6) are reduced copies of the Avangard units. warheads - almost nothing is known about them. The approximate principle of operation of the kinetic variant is that the launch vehicle takes off and enters orbit almost vertically, then carriers with blocks are released that accelerate to hypersonic speed, setting the initial trajectory to the target and when entering the high layers of the atmosphere, they release warheads. The warheads are made of some new alloy that enhances plasma generation and holds a larger plasma cloud (than a "Dagger" for example). And why is everyone talking about Europe as a target ? Did you know that from Russia to L.A is less than 5000 km, to Washington less than 6000? The earth is not flat google map. lol.
@@西口公子 это не уменьшенная копия сармата. Сармат жидкостная ракета а орешник твёрдотопливная. Скорее всего уменьшенная копия ярса или тополя.
@@西口公子 У этих идиотов мозгов не хватает что шутить не надо с Россией, им показали без ядерный вариант но может дождутся в ядерном исполнении, как Путин сказал клиент будет доволен от обоих вариантов. А тебе респект и уважение! Да каждый из 6 боеголовок по 6 суб-боеприпсов...
I am trying to find some good information about the kinetic warhead. Do you know were to find?
@@МирныйСмирный вот именно и она не может нести 36 боеголовок как минимум из-за массы и как максимум из-за места которого на этой ракете не много
@西口公子 tell men honestly are you e an idiot? where did you get the information about the new material, if it was a cut version of Sarmat it would have it would fly longer, and these are not smaller Аvanguards because the arrival trajectory does not match and there is no launch accelerator there and there cannot be, because the warhead would knock down the guidance of other warheads with its launch impulse and because it is a cut-down version of the Yars, its maximum range is much less, a maximum of 3-4 thousand kilometers. it feels like you are a Kremlin bot and among the debris a heavy and large panel was found, most likely it was the warhead body, which completely eliminates any comments about these being small warheads or that they are made of some new material
Из России с любовью! ♥️🚀♥️🚀😍
тогда не нойте когда в обратку ATACMS прилетают
@@olegmakogon7447 Tell that to Americans, they are not unreachable.
@@olegmakogon7447 Tell that to Americans.
Thank you Russia for defending your national security.
@@olegmakogon7447 тебе свет включили?
As a former munitions worker, I have to give these guys credit. This is quite an impressive system.
its not working, just an animation and ruZZian propaganda you falling Yankee!
@@Oryx_777Да, спроси у южмаша как он не работает
@@Kot_v_Chulkah ты с 3-го акаунта еще напиши
@@Oryx_777 If anyone is falling for propaganda, it'll be you
@@Oryx_777 it is not working, eehhhh? Why dfo you thing that Ukraine locked down the target complex in Denpropetrovsk? No access to anyone? it was the largest Ukrainian aerospace complex left from Soviet times. Apparently nothing is left from it.
the video is great, but you forgot something : the 6 warheads have another 6 sub warheads, so in total 36x !
is like 36 railgun strikes , that defeat bunkers.. is a bunker buster weapon. that apparently hit NATO officers operating secretly in an underground base.. The area was closed for weeks after the attack.
There are probably six buses, not one. But nobody knows for sure of course.
@@Levitikus1983 exactly 💯
@@Levitikus1983 что не англосакс ,то великий знаток Русских ракет 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Those Russians know how to make some weapons
FUERZA RUSIA! LAS ARMAS RUSAS SON LAS MAS AVANZADAS DEL PLANETA Y CON TECNOLOGIA👽👽! GLORIA AL EJERCITO RUSO!🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪✌🇦🇷🇦🇷
Run Vanya run from sirya
@@nahcho4llattlyatlettlie837 а Холхлы из Покровска 🤣🤣🤣
Russia has not been able to achieve success in Ukraine for three years, it has suffered terrible damage and even with the help of North Korea, etc., it has not been able to succeed. Russia is desperately waiting for Trump to come. If the Democrats had won, Russia would not have been able to continue the war and in less than 4 He used to accept defeat and give up. Of course, maybe your age is less than 16 years old and the information on Talk is at the level of school, however, you can ask your teacher, he will help you.
@nahcho4llattlyatlettlie837
Russian military bases remained, and the whole world saw and remembers how the Americans fled, leaving everything behind escaping Afghanistan, Billy.
@@nahcho4llattlyatlettlie837 But was the ukronaсi who fled Afghanistan called Vanya?
Chwała Wielkiej Rosji👏. Pozdrowienia z Polski.
Kolega się nie boi, że za takie deklaracje koledze bodnarowców naślą na kwaterę?
PS. Wolę z Ruskim zgubić, niż z Anglosasem znaleźć.
1:40 You lost me when you said the Warhead was based on America designs. How can it be based on America design when it's has 36 sub-warheads, that you forgot to mention that America designs have yet to demonstrate.
они как евреи...😂, везде где можно себя пихают.
There is nothing new in this.
Это говорит о тупости и надменности американцев
Yes, the arrogance is off the charts.
Как же мы без америки живем? Что ни сделаем все оказывается американские разработки. Даже если у американцев их нет 😂
Подлизнуть дяде сэму иначе забанят? 😂
If someone will claim they already have an operational anti-gravitation device, that actually works. The week after you guys will explain how exactly! 🤣Oreshnik is impressive and highly capable piece of weaponry, but right now only Russians know what-is-what and all the hows.
If they already have the missile, they probably already have their anti-missile.
@@waltermater2042 естественно
This is work for us .Find .
@@Kageross 👍
@@visionstreetwear108 А лучше украсть, у вас это хорошо получается.
*ЛЮБИШЬ БАНДЕРУ, ЛЮБИ И ИСКАНДЕРУ.*
@@leoalex3271 😅👍
😂😂😂
Орешники уже закончились, что дальше?
Сво запланировано на 10 или 20 лет?
@@Владимир-о2х8ю Орешников осталось на 2-3 дня!
@@iddqd6299 Орешников осталось на 2-3 Украины.
The Rocket contains 6x6 warheads, all together 36 warheads
Not all of those are warheads. Many of them will be decoys.
@@kingkea3451 That's what the shovels are for.
@@kingkea3451 Why? They can't be intercepted, what's the point of making baits?
Yeah, it's wierd that he only said 6. In the footage we can see that the missile used hit multiple times
@@dipereira0123 Yup from what we saw in Dnipro 2~3 weeks ago its definetely more than 6 warheads
Russian missile forces, the delivery of heat and light to anywhere in the world.
Problems with gas or fuel? Delivery of nuclear energy to any point on the planet
From Russia with tenderness and love.
Хотите попасть в Америку? Идите на службу в ракетные войска!!!
@@АлексейЕвгеньевич-ш5цхотите попасть по Америке😂😂😂
Как нам говорил полковник в танковых войсках ВС РФ - хотите посмотреть весь Мир, идите в танковые войска.
Слава , Российским инженерам 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👍👍👍👍👍👍
Ребята , давайте жить дружно 😉🤝🤝🤝🤝
Орешники уже закончились.
Что дальше?
Сво по плану и орешник входил в план?
Более мощный СССР рухнул после Афганистана на четвертый год, когда рухнет рфия после войны с Украиной или во время?
@@Владимир-о2х8ювсе по плану, территория Украины все меньше каждый день. Вы проигрываете, и проиграете в итоге, это уже очевидно всем. Вас просто распилят, вот что будет дальше!
@@Владимир-о2х8юкак может закончится то, чего нету) это все мультики🤣🤣🤣
@@Владимир-о2х8юты там за хлебом аккуратно ходи, а то в бусике тцк окажешься)) или ты из гейропы умничаешь??😁
@@Denis18273 Скорость продвижения асвабадителев 35 км/год.Скорость движения воинской коллоны-35 км/ЧАС.Вопрос знатокам:Сколько времени требуется доехать РОА до Киева?
This is why "USA 🇺🇸not bringing democracy in Russia"
😂😂😂
@@smartbaba1321 bây giờ cả thế giới đều biết dân chủ của mỹ là giếng dầu là mỏ đất hiếm và mang lại đau khổ cho người dân các nước
🤣👍
😂😂
They have already brought. This time is known as the saddest time in the history of Russia. The people were impoverished and starving. Total corruption, theft and drug addiction. During this time, Russia lost people comparable to the Second World War. Russia already had the "democracy" of the USA, and everyone remembers it very well, that's why they support Putin.
The US saved Russia multiple times from starvation. In 1930s, 1940s and 90s.
Oreshnik is also an educational system.
It teaches NATO generals and little kids math by asking the question.
What is 6 times 6? And how hot are 4000 °C?
or how fast is 3,4 mach per second?
@@tyrantonion6660 ... and yet you still have NATO and EU officials claiming that Russian army is "a joke" and that Russia is just "a huge gas station ⛽ with some nukes".
Underestimating your opponent is the biggest favor that you can give to your opponent, especially when your opponent is Russia.
@@matthewinnkeeper3538 Just some incompetent warmongers.
@matthewinnkeeper3538 Russia is a joke. I think NATO's biggest mistake all these years was thinking Russia was a military power. How wrong they were. 🤦
Los generales de la OTAN se ríen de tu comentario. Una simple patinete con explosivos fue más eficiente que ese misil de época de la guerra fria. 😅
- Может бахнем?
- обязательно бахнем и не раз, весь мир в труху ! ,
Но потом . 😅
Remember that this stuff is actually classified and this video is completely speculative 😂
😳🧐🤣👍❗
Làm gì phương Tây làm được như tên lửa oreshnik của Nga
Basically the author's opinion. Also, lacks the basic nature of and why it is called the Oreshnik - each of the six reentry vehicles has six other sub-munitions as clearly seen in the demo impact photos. In that sense, a very wrong analyses indeed.
@@xoxou5388 and it's almost a replica of just a basic Satan II LOL
It’s literally just an icbm with conventional warheads. Imagine if the US decided to put HE warheads on their minuteman 3’s and tridents. Pretty stupid tbh and not impressive. More of a case of utilizing what you have to expand a capability that was already there to begin with.
YOU ARE WAY OFF ! those 6 MURS splits into 6 total 36
Also it isn't an ICBM its an IRBM.
Хотелось добавить, что против России стоят санкции! И это всё сделано из наших стиральных машин😂😂, бош и Индезит😂
И в одном экземпляре.
@@vanhous822 Довав еще стиралку Киргизия
Вятка! 🤣
Из унитазов собрали
@A8.88V из говна и палок точно также как и АвтоВАЗ, только палки уже закончились
The oreshnik is not an ICBM as it does not travel intercontinental. But it is an IRBM intermediate range ballistic missile.
Yup
While americans and ukrainian says like why Russia is creating super expensive icbm
These dudes think its expensive
And from stats we know
Russian weapon is strong and cheap
@@lexburen5932 true
Well, technically it can travel over content
Ні, це МБР Кедр у якого зменшили злітну частину і збільшили бойову частину, тому він не може літати далеко і став ракетою середньої дальності. Тобто в основі це все ще МБР. Це доволі тупо.
Ні, це МБР Кедр у якого зменшили злітну частину і збільшили бойову частину, тому він не може літати далеко і став ракетою середньої дальності. Тобто в основі це все ще МБР. Це доволі тупо.
Wasn't surprised Russia holding all master peaces of game changer 😎
Ukrainians are still in Kursk, what changer you're talking about? 😅
@@piizaroikg7578в Курске? Или в Курской области десяток деревень контролируют? Посмотри динамику фронта на Донбассе 😁
@@piizaroikg7578 они хоть на секунду были в Курске?)
@@piizaroikg7578 их там специально держат, чтоб ослабить другие направления, Россия наступает по всем фронтам
Какие хорошие стиральные машины в России !!!
Hypersonic shovel 😮
With washing machine chips strapped on.
haha so funny
@@reggiep75 🤣👍❗
@IronMan-u2m 😂👍❗
@@reggiep75failed missile 😂
No damages happened
Меня умиляет этот мультик, где противоракета Пэтриота так бодро вылетает на встречу боевому блоку "Орешника", буд-то её скорость так же сверхзвуковая, и равна скорости Орешника, а Орешник достигает цели только лишь умением отклоняться и маневрировать. 😂. Да Пэтриот даже среагировать не успел при ударе по Южмашу. 😂
ПВО PATRIOT нет в Днепропетровской области, никто и не говорит что он должен сбивать такого рода ракеты, для этого существует THAAD, а от пустого "Орешника" заводу ЮЖМАШУ как то фиолетово :D
жду комменты по типу "были поражены подземные цели, которых не видно со спутниковых снимков" ага, методичка быстренько сменилась, после того как показали спутниковые снимки невредимого завода... для бункеров и прочего нужны специальные противобункерные ракеты, ну или как минимум ядерная боеголовка, "кинетической" силы будет недостаточно
@@Hayabusa-c6p THAAD - это заатмосферный перехват. Когда есть возможность перехватить боеголовку целиком, до того, как произошло разделение на отдельные РГЧ. А теперь представь, если разделение РГЧ произойдет вне пределов эффективного поражения THAAD. Много он наловит РГЧ, да к тому же маневрирующих, в атмосфере?
@@si6ii нет никаких доказательств маневров этих зарядов, особенно всех 36, самому то в это верится?)
@@Hayabusa-c6p а почему вы так уверены, что нет доказательств? На обнародованных видео болванки приходят под разными углами относительно земли (близкими к 90⁰), если посмотрите, ну например опубликованные фотографии прилета боевых блоков того же Минитмен 3, там будет совсем другая картина. Угол столкновения болванки Минитмена 3 с землёй около 45-70⁰.
@@Hayabusa-c6p какие ракеты,ты чего ? аристович сказал же что ракеты кончились! разве он может врать ? ) а если серьезно -никаких доказательтв того что южмаш не пострадал. но есть презентация мин обороны, о возможностях блоков
if they chose to show this,you can be sure they got much better toys in the warehouse
Izgleda da zapad zna više o orešniku nego Rusi a nemogu(neznaju) ga napraviti😊😊😊
Po CNN vojnim ANALitičarima Rusija je ostala bez ikakvih raketa još u Aprilu 2022 🤡
@@matthewinnkeeper3538
Oreshnik is like an orbital strike
Heard russia got first missile that's able to destroy American satelines
You heard wrong lol. America was the first country in the world to do that
@@deadbeats7604 the soviets are the first country that produced ICBM so no America wasn't first
You know nothing.
@@Owls-Toads you are the one who know nothing it was the R-7 Semiorka in 1957, give me the sources that prove I am wrong
Ребят, представьте. Это было сделано со стиральных машин обычных. Дайте нам чего по круче, холодильники там, или микроволновки мы покажем вам "Кузькину мать"!
я отдал своего мойщика окон! У него иногда, траектория движения, вообще не предсказуема!)
@RusNovgorod да, спасибо, мы его получили. Он стал прообразом для гераней.
This didn't quite illustrate Oreshnik and it's 6 by 6 projectile
No
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
Lmao I watched a video were this guy talks about how old Russian missiles are their infrastructure is destroyed. They have old planes have old choppers. They have everything old he said 😂😂😂. I live in Texas. The infrastructure here in Texas is horrible everything is old. Everything is falling apart their electric electricity lines suck.
Noname knows more then the governments 😆 they just watched from satellites and radars 😂
@@Noname-dtek bruh, there is literally multiple videos of the 36 warheads, what are you on about
And yet, not a single radar can see a hypersonic missile because its body is in plasma during flight. Not a single radar will be able to see and not a single air defense will be able to intercept hypersound when a missile flies at a speed of 3 km/sec.
"Орешник" перемещается помоему более 10 km/sec
@@ВладРочев-г7ю бред. Тогда бы она покинула Землю
в космосе, но не в низких слоях атмосферы.
Radar would have tracked the missile in space from launch to atmospheric reentry, or for about 15 minutes.
It can be seen, that's why Russia told the Americans they will launch an Oreshnik to Ukraine, to not wage a nuclear war when NORAD sees the missile. Get your facts right!
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 Россия священая наша ДЕРЖАВА РОССИЯ ЛЮБИМАЯ НАША СТРАНА ❤❤❤❤❤
00:50 ~"and is filled with sollid fuel." *shows to tanks for liquid fuel*
Edit: I dont know where the rest of my comment went... He also talked about reaching orbit and later says max range: if it could reach orbit, it would be able to reach anywhere. And 3rd: He talks about spin spin thrusters and tht is able to manouver: if the mass was equally distributed and it points streight ahead in flight it could not manouver with just spin thrusters. It would need to have an offset mass, a movable mass insight ot it has to have manouvering thrusters. Those two point where missing from my comment. Weird.
Bro is getting sloppy
👍
@lancerevo9747 👍❗
I was going to say the same thing. Solid propellant doesn't have tanks and plumbing.
Also, at 1:49 there are 6x6 and they say 12x12 wheels ...
American design? A lot of beats you missed there. We saw the video, bro. Every of the 6 warheads holds another 6 warheads. So one rocket delivers 36 warheads. And the purpose of the Oreshnik is to be a CONVENTIONAL vehicle for strategic deterrence. They don't need nuclear warheads. They used kinetic energy impact. For now. To level a NATO airfield, you need a minimum of 100 conventional rockets. Oreshnik will do the job with 4. A big cost optimization. Stop playing with fire and go to your Representative and push for restoring global peace.
How do you know, except from propaganda claims? So far the only one fired contained 6 blocks of concrete ballast...
@@jnievele Lookup MIT professor Ted Postol analysis. The first one. And stop with this propaganda bullshit already. In the original video is visible if you count.
The people who've watched the CCTV footage of the 36 thunderbolts need no further explanation of what this missile is capable of. Is it mere coincidece the CCTV was there to capture the blitz? Probably the most uploaded footage of anything ever.
Well, there are many webcams all over nowadays so that's no miracle.
РОССИЯ ВПЕРЁД!!! 🇷🇺💪❤
sosia vperde 😂😂😂
@@7dopefishпочему отдал Курахово? На днях отдаш Покровск
@@7dopefishесть хорошая поговорка , смеётся тот , кто смеётся последним
Oreshnik missiles strikes its targets like lightning.
From captured components, it seems to create plasma during its descent and generates lightning strike when the warhead(s) hit the ground.
Russia has been known for its electromagnetic expertises.
Like something of science fiction, many analists says that is a game changer...
@@pramuanchutham7355that's why
1 russia is making 'alabuga'
2 american scientist say that it was russia who changed electromagnetic field of earth and send milton to them
@@framed-r9g what is alabuga?
@@framed-r9g Who is this Milton person?
Я смотрю, всему миру наш Орешничек понравился 😂😂😂
как может нравится то, чего нет ?
@@MrMursilok Я помню как над Кинжалом смеялись, типа мультики. Потом эти мультики на их чубы посыпались. Убогие, что с них взять.
@@ViktorSmirnov-qj3fg ты ещё скажи что смеялись над Димой Семицветовым, тормоз. Я тебе про несуществующий Орешник, а не про крылатую ракету. Ты поверил в 4 мультика 21 ноября, значит убогий именно ты.
Так орешники уже закончились.
Что дальше, развал рфии как СССР после Афганистана?
Планы по сво расписаны на 10 или 20 лет?
@@Владимир-о2х8ю как закончились?! То есть это были не мультики с Мосфильма? Больной, вы делаете успехи, стадию отрицания вы похоже преодолели. Теперь стадия "торг" - этот орешник был последний 😆😆😆
"Американской разработки...."?! Ну это как товарищ Пентьковский (был такой засранец партийный, который был прикреплен к научной группе, по разрабтке нового оборудования еще в 70-х в одно из НИИ - дословно из уст одного из группы разработчиков!) утащил разработки новой ЭВМ в америку и вдруг появился Пентиум.....
Орешники уже закончились, что дальше?
Главное чтобы с АвтоВАЗа разработки не воровали
@@АленаСеверная-л4я пентиум уже был у них.Под руководством Пентковского они сделали пентиум 3
@@corbanavar4700 Что сразу не 4.
Не льстите американцам. Это было тогда когда ещё вас в проекте не было! 70-е годы, тогда был ещё даже не ПК, а ЭВМ в размер с огромный спортзал!
@АленаСеверная-л4я ЭВМ был ещё в сорокавых.А историю Пентковского и Бориса Бабаяна(его напарника по Эльбрусу) я знаю от и до.Интел существует с шестидесятых годов и процессоры выпускал с 1971 года.Пентковский помог действительно решить сложные задачи,но он начал работать в США только в 1993 году над пентиум 3
.1 misile 6 sub 36 fragment that's cheap material from washing machine IC 500nm
@@ngeneaew россия и на лампах зделает и она долетит, не сомневайся.
lmao who cares, they keep making these missiles very cost efficient while each murican rocket costs shitload of money and this eventually causes ukraine to lose - west simply has no money to support them anymore
Ah physics, what a wonderful subject. Hypersonic terminal speed cannot be achieved by gravity, even if hypersonic from space. There is simply too much drag in the atmosphere. The warheads must have thrusters and heat shields. The terminal velocity alone cannot provide enough energy to penetrate but a shielded molten blob at 4000 degrees sure helps. Ever heard of penetrating shaped charges? That's the sort of tech you see with Oreshnik. Normal ballistic missiles slow down before delivery.
They didn’t tell you that the warhead flies in the plasma around it, it feels no resistance. The Russians have created a metal that does not melt at 3000 degrees and at the same time all the electronics on board work.
Каким образом тогда метеорит влетает в атмосферу земли со скоростью 11-70 км в секунду?
@@mistermuhutya2583 В космосе можно разгоняться свободно, поскольку там нет сопротивления воздуха, соответственно и влететь в атмосферу можно тоже на очень большой скорости, но если скорость входа в атмосферу будет слишком большая, этот воздух покажется по прочности как бетон. Чтобы пролететь всю атмосферу на достаточно большой скорости, нужна идеальная аэробаллистическая форма, прочность сравнимая с вольфрамом и достаточная масса.
@@onega23 форма как раз может оказаться не столь важна, если вокруг создана плазма. А масса, вообще то передаваемая энергия, это масса + энергия, то есть скорость.
I believe you made a mistake in the title I believe this is an intermediate range ballistic missile
Who cares, its exactly the same tech only the range change, and Russia also have tons of ballistic missiles that can reach over 10,000 km up to 20,000 km
same thing just missing an extra rocket stage
@@ninehundred999 intercontinental implies a lot more range
@@ninehundred999 Because facts matter, maybe not to you but they do to other people.
Россия убрала одну ступень с обычной баллистической межконтинентальной.
"Almost impossible" are u kidding? it's 100% impossible to intercept
Можно) завод Южмаш перехватил же😁
Не будет агрессивной политики Америки и Европы против России, тогда не будет и всяких Орешников и прочих. Русские очень справедливый народ и не терпит двойных стандартов и ущемления традиционных человеческих ценностей.
А кто хочет мирно поговорить, спросить, или обсудить что-то - пишите, с удовольствием поговорю и объясню точку зрения.
У тебя кишка тонка мирно говорить. Отвечай, откуда на Украине бензин и соляра для гражданской и военной техники ? Традиционная человеческая ценность это правда, русский народ терпит бесконечную ложь, в том числе и про Орешник, и про Крокус и про что угодно. Агрессивная политика США и Европы, это такой же сценический понос, как например награды Адама Кадырова.
@MrMursilok я думал всех кострюлеголовых уже тцк забрали. Видимо про тебя забыли😆
Орешники уже закончились?
СССР тоже был великий и развалился после Афганистана.
Что говорят на России о сво ? Оно запланировано на 10 или 20 лет?
@@Владимир-о2х8ю а что телемарафон уже закончился что тут спрашиваешь?😆
@ПовелительПроторуссов думал что у русских есть ум, но не ошибся, как выяснилось ума нет от слова совсем.
Россия страна -ТЮРЬМА в которой население отбывает пожизненное заключение.
For people wondering "36 warheads", the missile itself only have 6 warheads, but every single warhead have 6 submunition for conventional explosive like cluster b0mb.
W R O N G !!!!! THE SUB MUNITIONS ARE NOT LIKE CLUSTER BOMBS , THE HAVE NO EXPLOSIVE , THEY ARE ALL HYPERSONIC PROJECTILES ...... Do some real research.
36 warheads. Then what is the kinetic energy of each? And the second question: maybe all 36 warheads have penetrating power? Or did the warheads simply disintegrate in the last section, and therefore it seems that each of the 6 warheads has submunitions???
@@КешаБурундук it would be pointless if the warhead disintegrated.
if your warhead is conventional explosives, there is a limit to the speed it can go without burning up in the atmosphere from the friction.
but you can go higher mach speeds if you use a kinetic warhead - no explosives just a solid projectile made from tungsten alloy, that can handle the heat, up 3500 C.
higher speeds make it harder / impossible to intercept.
But at even more speed eventually any material will burn up, so more MACH is not always better, there are limits when you are in atmosphere.
@@hindugoat2302 more mach is always better. The submunitions all have mass and when paired with that velocity, will impart extreme energy to the targets. And from video evidence, they clearly didn't burn up before reaching Pivdenmash. I'm very curious to know the extent of damage done to it, but I guess we'll have to wait till the end of the war to hear the truth.
@@КешаБурундукв ней не было боеголовок, в ней были только металлические болванки , возможно вольфрамовые. Они прилетели с максимально возможной скоростью с какой может прилететь метеорит из космоса.
Is it just 6 warheads? I've heard bigger numbers like 36 warheads per missile from various sources.
each one of those 6 warhead carry 6 submunitions. So, yes. 36 in total.
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
@@Noname-dtek You sure about that? You know there's video from multiple angle where 6 waves consisting of 6 missiles drop on a factory at mach 10-11.
Yes, but video about nuclear verison.
@@Noname-dtek Have you seen the video of the strike? You can clearly see 36 warheads there.
Отличная графика , только где наш скотч и изолента ?! Не поверю , что без них собрали
Видать не хило, поджилки трясутся, раз столько "диванных экспертов", пиарятся на тему Орешника!
I just asked for oreshnik video and here it is. Thanks
Главное чтобы не с доставкой на дом
@ ни в коем случае
Хорошая вещь, нужная. Уже доказала свою полезность.
As far as we know and for what we saw in first launch there are 6 primary head and those 6 warheads each one divided in 6 which make a total of 36 individual warheads!!!
I assume that you just didn't freak out people.
6:04 Not by Ukr, but just made and operated by the US.
No it's not operated by US personnel. Ukrainians were trained to use this system.
@@Aristocrat1cs please, everyone knows that nato weapons are being operated by nato soldiers, you are insulting our intelligence
@@Aristocrat1cs nvm he is subscribed to n a z 1 glorifying yt channel🤦 everything makes sense now😂
@@leight420 you have no intelligence when you believe such things.
@leight420 lmao (edited) how many emoji s you gonna add?
Quite scary 😢....but a detailed presentation..🎉
Dont worry, bro.
We wont use it against clever and wise countries. We're russians. We're for peace always. Just dont be a threat to us, talk with us and listen to us, like we are listening to you. Peace to you, bro, from Russia with true love, wherever are you from.😊
@@user_youtube-w5f my clear intentions is to watch more informative videos like this and not to suffocate in nuclear winter..from India 🙏
Ракета «Орешник» 🚀RT, Sputnik🇷🇺✔👍👋
Интересуются - значит боятся! Орешник - сила!❤
Так орешники уже закончились, смысл бояться чего уже нет.
Могучая России начала сво и запланировала на 10 или 20 лет и орешник тоже по плану.
Развал и крах рфии тоже по плану как и СССР после Афганистана или раньше?
@@Владимир-о2х8ю По списку ваша очередь разваливаться, а мы подождём и с удовольствием посмотрим этот захватывающий процесс, вот только попкорном запасёмся.
How do you explain the lighting like appearance that open up the sky like an alien invasion
Плазма
This missile is not a strategic missile; it is an intermediate-range missile. It does not go into space. Its engines accelerate to speeds of Mach 10-12. It climbs to an altitude of 100 km and from there dives towards the target, constantly accelerating. At some point, the warhead section splits into 6 controllable blocks, which in turn divide into 6 more combat devices. 36 combat projectiles fly to their destination, maneuvering. The temperature reaches 4000°C. The temperature is similar to that on the surface of the sun. Within the kinetic impact radius, everything (metal, organic matter, etc.) breaks down into elementary particles. Nothing remains. Thus, by playing with the precision of the strike, you can achieve the effect of a nuclear bomb attack without radioactive contamination of the surrounding area. Western analysts have perfectly calculated the approach time of this missile. And these are minutes to any target within its range.
We are faced with a fundamentally new weapon, comparable only to a nuclear charge, but without the side effects associated with radiological contamination of the area.
Russia is creating an entire line of these weapons: with a flight time of 3 minutes.
People in the West seem not to understand the significance of this new Russian weapon due to all the Western propaganda they are being flooded with.
This new missile is a conventional weapon that has the same destructive power as a tactical nuclear weapon without being a nuclear weapon, without producing the radiation, without the mushroom cloud, and without the political backlash of using a nuclear weapon.
The structure it destroyed in Ukraine was just massive. It was literally the size of a small city.
To destroy such a city or such a massive structure like that missile destroyed would have required at least a small tactical nuclear weapon before.
Not with this new weapon.
The issue here is that nuclear weapons cannot be used unless you want to commit suicide, become internationally isolated, and deal with radiation.
But with this new weapon, you don't have to worry about any of that.
Now Russia has a weapon that can destroy an entire city without using a nuclear weapon.
Now I want to ask you a question.
What do you think this means for all NATO military installations, naval, army, and air force bases or any mass concentration of troops in Europe and parts of the United States?
What do you think will happen if NATO tries to mobilize any large number of troops and equipment anywhere in Europe or the Western United States to fight against Russia?
Prior to the existence of this new weapon, Russia would have had to use nuclear weapons to destroy NATO armies.
Not with this weapon.
Plus, Russia could use multiple missiles carrying this weapon and target the same location with multiple missiles.
Eventually, Russia will make a submarine version, and then all of the continental United States will be within its reach. Then, every U.S. army, naval, air force, industrial, economic, political, and population center will be within reach of this destructive weapon.
Russia is now in the same position as the United States was between 1945 and 1949 when the U.S. was the only country with nuclear weapons in the world.
Russia now has a weapon so powerful it changes the rules of the game.
They literally have a weapon with the power of a nuclear weapon that is not a nuclear weapon.
I saw their speed on video, like lightning crashing into the ground, I don’t believe that they can maneuver at such high speeds.
I think at one point (closer to it's target at the ground) it will stop maneuvering.
It's the weight, gravity, and rocket it's making them dropping faster like an Anvil with strong balloon popped and dropped in the air.
the radius of turning about the reentry flight vector is small.
most of the maneuver are high in the atmosphere.
They are def not maneuverable. They would have to remain at low(ish) altitude for most of the flight for that, which would be incompatible with their near vertical impact.
Oreshnik is a traditional IRBM that was simply used at near its minimum range, hence it was lobbed extremely high to come down near vertically.
Also, you aren't going to fit 36 maneuvering warheads in a road mobile missile. The control surfaces needed to maneuver take up way too much space.
The spin nozzles on the rear of the RV are used to "impart spin" as it leaves the Bus. The spin stabilizes the RV so that it flies straight like a bullet from a rifle, and does not tumble. The Bus maneuvers and deploys the RVs at the correct launch point and direction. As far as terminal guidance, or maneuvering during the terminal phase of flight, I think the Russians are not releasing information on that technique.
And the faster the MIRV goes, the harder it is to give it guidance other than inertial navigation, as the high speed will turn the air in front of the warhead to plasma from pressure and friction. Plasma unfortunately doesn't allow any electromagnetic frequency through, so both optical and radar targeting would be blocked.
I've been waiting for this video
There is a mistake in the video, the rocket stages use solid rocket fuel instead of liquid.
Как в фильме ДМБ -" товарищ командир , может бахнем? - обязательно бахнем... Но потом)))
Saar very nice video saar
Flying Lungi
Thanks Saar!
@@Aitellylmao
@@biswajeetdassh9305 no saar my lower garments is white saar.Currently enjoying the vid in squatting position in a sea beach😍😍😍
we have toi-lets sar @@biswajeetdassh9305
Pls how did you know much about this missile. Russian didn't give much info... am curious
@@king_Joah Дальнось баллистических ракет средней дальности - от 1000 до 5500 км. Дальность межконтинетальных баллистических ракет - от 5500 км и дальше. Дальность баллистических ракет меньшей дальности - от 500 до 1000 км. Дальность тактических баллистических ракет - от 50 до 500 км
Interesting is, that the one fired into the city of Dnipro last month didn't damage that much there. Iskander cruise missile is much more effectiv, if they make it into the target. Mostly every rocket is taken down by german Gepard tank or Patriot antimissile system. The only cities are in danger when they are near the border to Russia, because the time of identification and defense is to short.
Love your videos! How do you do these so fast? Do you use AI tools?
The voice is obviously A.I.
I don't use AI. We tried to use Artificial Intelligence but it does'nt work on Current Events
Nope
Разочарую тебя... Искусственного интеллекта, пока не существует ВООБЩЕ!)
This very amazing 😮
Hay un hombre: Dr Roque Espaillat
Un tiempo: Ahora
Una Tecnología ⚙ O Metodo:
Cobrar y Castigar
Cobraremos y Castigaremos.
Nato officials say they use technology of stolen microwaves in ukraine. 😁😆
This should be marked as HIGHLY SPECULATIVE VIDEO. Also: all ballisic missiles of sufficient range are hypersonic and thrusters on Mirv are for stbilisation, not manouvering. Oreshnik is not ICBM - that's IRBM.
This channel is on point with the newest technology to cover in its videos.
Слава Русскому оружию! 💪🏼
Nice cartoon 😊👏
Russians made a hell of a weapon
its just a normal intermediate ranged ballistic missile. not new tech
@@british.propagandist.7 a VERY fitting name of yours
@SomeOne-ph1gw I make edits for fun hence my name
Pretty shit edits but still edits 😅
@@thule505Neither side is immune from propaganda and propaganda is not a bad thing. Both the Russian and western governments use propaganda to get the support of their people - politics is a game of propaganda especially due to the invention of nukes no countries will actually go to war
No way of knowing what warhead is used. Kinetic, explosive or nuke. Only prior warning, if given, works.
6 war head Shovels! What more do you need to know
Ну не надо с России ссориться, никогда и никому, не надо будить медведя! Не надо НАТО расширяться в нашу сторону и всё ХОРОШО! Украина неужели не понимала, что Россия очень против, но даже сейчас Украина стремится в НАТО и Россия уничтожит Украину из-за этого!!
I'm not sure you understand warhead undocking correctly. They don't fall to the ground at the same time. Rather, they detach one at a time with a slight delay, like from a Colt drum.
Да он вообще не чего не понимает..он говорит что они просто падают и набирают скорость..а в реале там есть ещё ракета которая им даёт разгон до самых слоев атмосферы.поэтому и называется 1x6x6
Very interesting video, but there is one thing. 6 parts with 6 warheads. It was one missile😅 what was the point of launching 6 missiles with an empty warhead?)
This wasn't a great video; it completely missed the reason which made Oreshnik so lethal; Each of the 6 war heads carrie another SIX war heads; in total THIRTY-SIX war heads rains down on target with mach 12, making it not 'very difficult', but impossible to intercept with current systems.
As seen on the security camera video that captured Oreshnik attack in Ukraine, warheads were made of tungsten like exotic material, impact of 6 waves of 6 meteor like rods with devastating accuracy crates power roughly equivalent 1,5 tons of high explosive purely with kinetic energy, creating temperatures around 3000 celcius.
This turns everything into dust in the instant impact vicinity of each of the 36 rods, making it the perfect weapon to take out Nato military infrastructure, especially airfields and bunkers.
What Nato has terrifyingly realised, is that with hundred or so of these missiles, Russia now has the capability to completely wipe out all of European military infrastructure and airfields without sophisticated plans that require multiple stealth aircraft, or use of nuclear weapons.
From Kamchatka, Oreshnik can already reach the territory around West Coast of the US, and obviously its a matter of time before before full coverage is achieved.
Its the perfect first strike weapon.
Absolutely 100% correct. You have identified the exact reason why this missile was built and that NATO simply does not understand that they can cripple their military infrastructure in so many ways to make them completely defenceless.
That these are nuclear capable and are ballistic missiles means they could not be used as a first strike weapon. There would be no way for NATO to know that they are conventional, thus their use against NATO targets might very well prompt a nuclear response.
If these things get launched at the mainland US, within an hour St. Petersburg and Moscow will exist only in history books. Russia knows this. NATO and the US knows this, yet the Russians keep insisting that these are actually viable weapons outside of a nuclear exchange.
Для этого есть сармат. На много мощнее и быстрее
People in the West seem not to understand the significance of this new Russian weapon due to all the Western propaganda they are being flooded with.
This missile is not a strategic missile; it is an intermediate-range missile. Its engines accelerate to speeds of Mach 10-12. It climbs to an altitude of 100 km and from there dives towards the target, constantly accelerating. At some point, the warhead section splits into 6 controllable blocks, which in turn divide into 6 more combat devices. 36 combat projectiles fly to their destination, maneuvering. The temperature reaches 4000°C. The temperature is similar to that on the surface of the sun. Within the kinetic impact radius, everything (metal, organic matter, etc.) breaks down into elementary particles. Nothing remains. Thus, by playing with the precision of the strike, you can achieve the effect of a nuclear bomb attack without radioactive contamination of the surrounding area. Western analysts have perfectly calculated the approach time of this missile. And these are minutes to any target within its range.
We are faced with a fundamentally new weapon, comparable only to a nuclear charge, but without the side effects associated with radiological contamination of the area.
Russia is creating an entire line of these weapons: with a flight time of 3 minutes.
This new missile is a conventional weapon that has the same destructive power as a tactical nuclear weapon without being a nuclear weapon, without producing the radiation, without the mushroom cloud, and without the political backlash of using a nuclear weapon.
The structure it destroyed in Ukraine was just massive. It was literally the size of a small city.
To destroy such a city or such a massive structure like that missile destroyed would have required at least a small tactical nuclear weapon before.
Not with this new weapon.
The issue here is that nuclear weapons cannot be used unless you want to commit suicide, become internationally isolated, and deal with radiation.
But with this new weapon, you don't have to worry about any of that.
Now Russia has a weapon that can destroy an entire city without using a nuclear weapon.
Now I want to ask you a question.
What do you think this means for all NATO military installations, naval, army, and air force bases or any mass concentration of troops in Europe and parts of the United States?
What do you think will happen if NATO tries to mobilize any large number of troops and equipment anywhere in Europe or the Western United States to fight against Russia?
Prior to the existence of this new weapon, Russia would have had to use nuclear weapons to destroy NATO armies.
Not with this weapon.
Plus, Russia could use multiple missiles carrying this weapon and target the same location with multiple missiles.
Eventually, Russia will make a submarine version, and then all of the continental United States will be within its reach. Then, every U.S. army, naval, air force, industrial, economic, political, and population center will be within reach of this destructive weapon.
Russia is now in the same position as the United States was between 1945 and 1949 when the U.S. was the only country with nuclear weapons in the world.
Russia now has a weapon so powerful it changes the rules of the game.
They literally have a weapon with the power of a nuclear weapon that is not a nuclear weapon.
Thank you! Finally I got what I asked for ! AiTelly! My respect! Can you do another one about Poseidon Torpedo? ❤
Sure thing! Will Have to research this a Lot
@@AitellyORESHNIK RS-26 6 Warheads 36 wolfram Darts Mach 🔟 🎯 MIRV IRBM
please don't ask this, please. You can figure out the topic yourself, the main thing here is to understand what his problem is. If anything, I can explain everything point by point. If you ask him, you will get information that is torn away from many factors that are very important!
@@Aitelly
It was a good video but you made the most critical mistake
The 6 MIRV carries 6 sub-warheads making it 6x6 =36 that’s why we saw 6 strikes each with 6 warheads landing .
Vitória russa contra o maldito ocidente 🇷🇺👍
The description given is the one for classic ICBMs the Oreshnik has 6x6 kinetic warheads as it is shown in the original video, Scott Ritter who's an expert in ballistics and nukes gave a brilliant explanation, have a check !
I heard that each MIRV had six little warheads for over 30 cluster munitions each traveling at mach 11. In the attack on the Ukrainian factory complex these missiles produced the kinetic effect of a battlefield nuke and absolutely erased the square mile factory and its underground facility. I know it probably has several loadouts but I'd be interested in finding out how accurate that assessment was. Great use of Maya as always.
Российская пропаганда говорит об уничтожении завода, а Украина говорит о нескольких дырках в крыше.
@@--_-0_0-_-- That's interesting. The video I saw didn't have a huge explosion. It was easier to get accurate news about war in WW1. I hate to tell you this. But Ukraine has propaganda too.
@@--_-0_0-_-- I wouldn't trust what Ukraine says about damage received. They've gained quite the reputation for inaccurate information.
There was literally minimal damage reported and the empty canisters were recovered from the first "demonstration".
What in the propaganda hell are you reading.
@@AzaIndustries I'm just seeking the truth. Nothing in that ugly reply you gave helps in that regard. You should learn some manners and be more respectful.
Amazing the Oreshnik!!! Russian as always, the best in missiles!!
While this vid is interesting, I do not think all of the info is correct. The test missile did (clearly) not contain any nuclear warheads! In fact it appears to have been: 6 MIRV packages that each contained 6 kinetic warheads. So 36 projectiles in all (the videos seem to support this). Now I suspect that it can be configured to have 6 MIRV each of which has a nuke - but that is **not** what we saw. There is some speculation about the precise nature of the 36 warheads - were they entirely kinetic, or was there a shaped charge type of thing? Or even exotic metals to produce a downward vaporisation cone upon impact? No idea ATM - I suspect the silence from Russia is deliberate. We may find out more if they deploy another one.
One other nit - I do not believe this classes as an ICBM, it is INF type missile (the vid states the range that clearly is in the ballpark).
"Kinetic warhead" being a nice PR version of "block of concrete"
Good video. You covered the Iskander too. Well done
But Oreshnik is an IMRBM, not ICBM. Hypersonic objects are not clearly visible to radars and so cannot be homed or shot down
You are technically correct about hypersonic objects not being visible, but not in a way that matters.
The plasma sheath hides the object itself, so usually radars can't detect the object. That said, the plasma sheath is extremely energetic, and not only shows up very clearly on radar, but actually emits radiation, meaning there is a chance that an RWR could detect it passively.
Hypersonic missiles are not stealthy for any practical purpose.
We, Russians, love all the people of the entire World. But we appreciate kind behavior.
Hey, it's not Intercontinental, its's Intermediate-range ballistic missile. And Oreshnik not only nuclear, but this is diffrerent story.
If you study the physics of these missile even little bit you will feel how idiotic comments that
Please take a look at the intelligence update about Oreshnik. The Oreshnik, who was supposdely fired at Dnipro on 2024/11/21 was in reality a 14 years old RS-26 Rubesh. Oreshnik is also furthermore still in test phase. with only 2 real test starts.
I am from Indonesian..like Russia
This video is full of self-contradictions. Solid 1st stage - showing clearly liquid fuel engine; Cold launch - later stating it's launched from the tube by it's first stage..
says 'contact sensor', later he says air-burst
It has 6 buses that each carry 6 warheads. That makes a total of 36 independent war heads! The missile than hit Ukraine was only a single missile and you could see 6 sets of hits with 6 warheads each!
No, it only has one bus. That was recovered by Ukraine.
Not only does go hypersonic but it can hover silently in the forest waiting for the transport vehicle to manifest around it. This is next level tech.
Amazing graphics.. But it feels like you're saying the same thing over and over again