It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
Lmao I watched a video were this guy talks about how old Russian missiles are their infrastructure is destroyed. They have old planes have old choppers. They have everything old he said 😂😂😂. I live in Texas. The infrastructure here in Texas is horrible everything is old. Everything is falling apart their electric electricity lines suck.
For people wondering "36 warheads", the missile itself only have 6 warheads, but every single warhead have 6 submunition for conventional explosive like cluster b0mb.
@@yleniachimetto299 Except these can maneuver at hypersonic speed, its kinda the same new missiles iran launched into israel, they can maneuver to prevent israel defense system from hiting them, this is the biggest new threat to western world, hypersonic maneuver missiles
The description given is the one for classic ICBMs the Oreshnik has 6x6 kinetic warheads as it is shown in the original video, Scott Ritter who's an expert in ballistics and nukes gave a brilliant explanation, have a check !
According to the classification of medium-range nuclear weapons, this is the target range from 500km to 5000km. In addition to ground vehicles, such systems can be installed on large ships, submarines and large strategic aircraft. Static large rockets should be able to hit anywhere on the planet. Separated charges should give a large total area of damage. Because the diameter brought to the area of the circle is equal to four radii brought to the areas of the circles. That is, the explosion power of the circle from the radius must be increased 8 times to get the explosion power of the circle from the diameter. This is with 1 bomb. But the same area of damage can be obtained from 4 explosions of circles from the radius. This is with 4 smaller bombs. That is, having a bomb X, you can increase the area of damage by 4 times or 9 times simply by dropping 4 bombs or 9 bombs. Or drop one bomb 8 times more powerful and the second bomb 27 times more powerful. Yes, it is easier to divide a 100 megaton bomb into 100 bombs and increase the area and number of targets much more. Place these 100 on different planes, ships, submarines and ground vehicles, trains, stationary systems (maybe spacecraft here I do not know).
I am usually behind your analysis but this time I think there were few errors. First I heard it also flies a quasi ballistic trajectory so that something like THAAD cannot shoot it down. Second inside the 6 original MRIV's are 6 more metal projectiles in each for total of 36 projectiles made from new alloy to withstand 4000° heat and penetrate bunkers as deep as 200ft. Oreshnik is meant to be a conventional alternative to nuclear weapons. There is also a rumor of alternative metal explosive warheads, again non nuclear.
Good video. You covered the Iskander too. Well done But Oreshnik is an IMRBM, not ICBM. Hypersonic objects are not clearly visible to radars and so cannot be homed or shot down
The The current concept of hypersonic is not limited to its speed, but also to its maneuverability. Traditional intercontinental missiles are hypersonic when they re-enter the atmosphere, but have a purely ballistic trajectory, which facilitates their interception. In the case of hypersonic missiles of this type, their maneuverability makes interception difficult precisely because of their maneuverability.
@@Emau158It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
This should be marked as HIGHLY SPECULATIVE VIDEO. Also: all ballisic missiles of sufficient range are hypersonic and thrusters on Mirv are for stbilisation, not manouvering. Oreshnik is not ICBM - that's IRBM.
please don't ask this, please. You can figure out the topic yourself, the main thing here is to understand what his problem is. If anything, I can explain everything point by point. If you ask him, you will get information that is torn away from many factors that are very important!
@@Charles-pf7zy Exactly, people acting like this is some cutting edge technology when multiple nations have possessed these kind of missiles for decades 😄
There is a difference between a ballistic and hypersonic missile, one of them can maneuver, which means that it does not follow a ballistic trajectory, and therefore does not belong to ICBM ballistic missiles
@@gokhanylmaz8514 “hypersonic” only refers to speed, so their capabilities dont determine that. I think you meant the difference between ballistic and cruise missiles or that there can be a hybrid of both
MIT Professor, Ted Postol, explained the Oreshnik and its implications in depth 10 days ago on Daniel Davis / Deep Dive. According to the U.S. Pentagon and other sources, the Oreshnik is an intermediate-range ballistic missile, or IRBM, not an ICBM.
Worth mentioning that MIRV technology isn't anything new and IRBMs and ICBMs reaching hypersonic velocities is also nothing new. Both American and Russian ICBMs have been capable of hypersonic terminal velocities since practically forever.
It's a IRBM a miniature version of the ICBM the technology is older than I am. The question is why are we still putting up with nuclear blackmail from Russia when we have Thad for IRBM's and SM6 for ICBM's.
The speed is so high (about 3 km/s) that the anti-aircraft systems do not have time to calculate the trajectory. Remember that they have to detect it, calculate its trajectory, aim and then fire (roughly speaking), so by the time they get to fire, the warheads have long since passed the interception point.
A functional Hypersonic missile absolutely was first designed by the United States. You're likely not old enough to know it, but look up the Pershing ll missile equipped with the MaRV warheads. Also, think about history, the United States had experimental jets going hypersonic back in the 1950s.
0:32 Эти двигатели лишь придают вращение, чтобы боеголовки летели точнее - та же логика что и у нарезных орудий. Да и как вообще, боеголовка может от чего-то уклонятся, если в ней нет электроники, то есть она даже засечь ничего не способна. 3:25 КАК?) Мда
You said it's based on American design? Does usa have this type of new missile I didn't think so ! Let's give a credit to Russian scientists I say Bravo Russian Bravo.
A functional Hypersonic missile absolutely was first designed by the United States. You're likely not old enough to know it, but look up the Pershing ll missile equipped with the MaRV warheads.
@@husseintamemy2558 sorry but you're incorrect. The MaRV warheads were capable of maneuverability mid flight. Russia basically copied the design they learned about from the United States in 1987 as part of the Arms Reduction treaty.
Quality of content is really deteriorating fast… for example you show the booster section with 2 tanks for oxidizer and fuel and you mention its a solid booster. That is just false. Please make your videos slower but more correct
first i deserve a pin
Thanks Just Pinned you for 24 Hours
@Aitelly yipee
your feet!
@jakubkvacala1880 ask him if u find the vid like 1 min after he posts and he'll respond
🥇
The Rocket contains 6x6 warheads, all together 36 warheads
Not all of those are warheads. Many of them will be decoys.
@@kingkea3451 That's what the shovels are for.
@@kingkea3451 Why? They can't be intercepted, what's the point of making baits?
Best shovel design of the century
Oreshnik missiles strikes its targets like lightning.
Hypersonic shovel 😮
With washing machine chips strapped on.
Is it just 6 warheads? I've heard bigger numbers like 36 warheads per missile from various sources.
each one of those 6 warhead carry 6 submunitions. So, yes. 36 in total.
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
@@Noname-dtek You sure about that? You know there's video from multiple angle where 6 waves consisting of 6 missiles drop on a factory at mach 10-11.
Yes, but video about nuclear verison.
@@Noname-dtek Have you seen the video of the strike? You can clearly see 36 warheads there.
This didn't quite illustrate Oreshnik and it's 6 by 6 projectile
No
It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
Lmao I watched a video were this guy talks about how old Russian missiles are their infrastructure is destroyed. They have old planes have old choppers. They have everything old he said 😂😂😂. I live in Texas. The infrastructure here in Texas is horrible everything is old. Everything is falling apart their electric electricity lines suck.
Noname knows more then the governments 😆 they just watched from satellites and radars 😂
For people wondering "36 warheads", the missile itself only have 6 warheads, but every single warhead have 6 submunition for conventional explosive like cluster b0mb.
Hey, it's not Intercontinental, its's Intermediate-range ballistic missile. And Oreshnik not only nuclear, but this is diffrerent story.
This channel is on point with the newest technology to cover in its videos.
I saw their speed on video, like lightning crashing into the ground, I don’t believe that they can maneuver at such high speeds.
I think at one point (closer to it's target at the ground) it will stop maneuvering.
I just asked for oreshnik video and here it is. Thanks
Very very similar to some 1970 1980 balistic missile
@@yleniachimetto299 Except these can maneuver at hypersonic speed, its kinda the same new missiles iran launched into israel, they can maneuver to prevent israel defense system from hiting them, this is the biggest new threat to western world, hypersonic maneuver missiles
AiTelly is never running out of content
Quite scary 😢....but a detailed presentation..🎉
Is...this...a nuclear warheads?
00:50 ~"and is filled with sollid fuel." *shows to tanks for liquid fuel*
Saar very nice video saar
Flying Lungi
Thanks Saar!
@@Aitellylmao
@@biswajeetdassh9305 no saar my lower garments is white saar.Currently enjoying the vid in squatting position in a sea beach😍😍😍
In AiTelly we trust!! Was worth the wait
Thanks
There is a mistake in the video, the rocket stages use solid rocket fuel instead of liquid.
The description given is the one for classic ICBMs the Oreshnik has 6x6 kinetic warheads as it is shown in the original video, Scott Ritter who's an expert in ballistics and nukes gave a brilliant explanation, have a check !
According to the classification of medium-range nuclear weapons, this is the target range from 500km to 5000km. In addition to ground vehicles, such systems can be installed on large ships, submarines and large strategic aircraft. Static large rockets should be able to hit anywhere on the planet. Separated charges should give a large total area of damage. Because the diameter brought to the area of the circle is equal to four radii brought to the areas of the circles. That is, the explosion power of the circle from the radius must be increased 8 times to get the explosion power of the circle from the diameter. This is with 1 bomb. But the same area of damage can be obtained from 4 explosions of circles from the radius. This is with 4 smaller bombs. That is, having a bomb X, you can increase the area of damage by 4 times or 9 times simply by dropping 4 bombs or 9 bombs. Or drop one bomb 8 times more powerful and the second bomb 27 times more powerful. Yes, it is easier to divide a 100 megaton bomb into 100 bombs and increase the area and number of targets much more. Place these 100 on different planes, ships, submarines and ground vehicles, trains, stationary systems (maybe spacecraft here I do not know).
Mother 🇷🇺. СПАСИБО!!!!!!!!!!!!
Russians have the fastest messaging delivery in the World!
Messaging being precise and spot on unmistakably clear!
😅
Russians made a hell of a weapon
its just a normal intermediate ranged ballistic missile. not new tech
This very amazing 😮
Hay un hombre: Dr Roque Espaillat
Un tiempo: Ahora
Una Tecnología ⚙ O Metodo:
Cobrar y Castigar
Cobraremos y Castigaremos.
I am usually behind your analysis but this time I think there were few errors.
First I heard it also flies a quasi ballistic trajectory so that something like THAAD cannot shoot it down.
Second inside the 6 original MRIV's are 6 more metal projectiles in each for total of 36 projectiles made from new alloy to withstand 4000° heat and penetrate bunkers as deep as 200ft.
Oreshnik is meant to be a conventional alternative to nuclear weapons. There is also a rumor of alternative metal explosive warheads, again non nuclear.
this is the fastest mail delivery option rather than Canada Post which is on a strike for over 4 weeks now
Thanks. I am not sure what you are trying to say, but I am glad you find it funny. Please do subscribe to our channel if you haven’t already.
Smoke signals are back
Good video. You covered the Iskander too. Well done
But Oreshnik is an IMRBM, not ICBM. Hypersonic objects are not clearly visible to radars and so cannot be homed or shot down
I believe you made a mistake in the title I believe this is an intermediate range ballistic missile
.1 misile 6 sub 36 fragment that's cheap material from washing machine IC 500nm
putting "hypersonic" in the title is funny considering even the V-2 rocket was hypersonic
@@Just_A_Random_Desk but the v2 ain’t carried 36 nuclear warheads
The The current concept of hypersonic is not limited to its speed, but also to its maneuverability. Traditional intercontinental missiles are hypersonic when they re-enter the atmosphere, but have a purely ballistic trajectory, which facilitates their interception. In the case of hypersonic missiles of this type, their maneuverability makes interception difficult precisely because of their maneuverability.
@@Emau158 no icbm carries 36 nuclear warheads lmao so who cares
@@carlosbanosoliva4226 "hypersonic" is a speed threshold, not a flight path.
@@Emau158It's not carrying 36 warheads.Atmospheric re-entry needs refractory materials. I think it is clear why. And it is simply impossible to create many such submunitions, and they are still very small, which means they need a special stabilizer that not only weighs a lot but also requires a lot of space in the submunition, of which there is not enough
Love your videos! How do you do these so fast? Do you use AI tools?
The voice is obviously A.I.
I don't use AI. We tried to use Artificial Intelligence but it does'nt work on Current Events
Nope
This should be marked as HIGHLY SPECULATIVE VIDEO. Also: all ballisic missiles of sufficient range are hypersonic and thrusters on Mirv are for stbilisation, not manouvering. Oreshnik is not ICBM - that's IRBM.
Thank you! Finally I got what I asked for ! AiTelly! My respect! Can you do another one about Poseidon Torpedo? ❤
Sure thing! Will Have to research this a Lot
@@AitellyORESHNIK RS-26 6 Warheads 36 wolfram Darts Mach 🔟 🎯 MIRV IRBM
please don't ask this, please. You can figure out the topic yourself, the main thing here is to understand what his problem is. If anything, I can explain everything point by point. If you ask him, you will get information that is torn away from many factors that are very important!
Orechnik is the best
I’ve always been waiting for you guys to make a ICBM video
Nice work
hueshnik. slava ukraine! 🇺🇦
Слава России ))
@@R4FSAN 200ым слава
Waiting for this man
The oreshnik is not an ICBM as it does not travel intercontinental. But it is an IRBM intermediate range ballistic missile.
all icbms and irbms go at hypersonic speeds facepalm
@@Charles-pf7zy Exactly, people acting like this is some cutting edge technology when multiple nations have possessed these kind of missiles for decades 😄
There is a difference between a ballistic and hypersonic missile, one of them can maneuver, which means that it does not follow a ballistic trajectory, and therefore does not belong to ICBM ballistic missiles
@@gokhanylmaz8514 “hypersonic” only refers to speed, so their capabilities dont determine that. I think you meant the difference between ballistic and cruise missiles or that there can be a hybrid of both
This a fantastic channel, but i would love to a list of sources. That would make me take this a lot more seriously than other youtubers.
Please I want you to do a video tutorial on how I can be doing this animation video
Finally the wait is over
Thx
*ANYONE IN 2087 ??💖✨*
What?
No nadie quiere tu OF adiós
@@Aitelly its on of those only fans bots
I dont know bout 2087,but I am from 2081
@@Naomi-GibSon bot ahh
🇷🇺 ❤
I love your channel ❤🎉
Finally the video is out
Can we have a video explaining Thaad defence system
but... if you took the money this would cost and put it in drones.....
It mostly contains nuclear warheads.
💥W👀W💥
We need AMCA fighter jet video
Designed based on American design? Lol
Russia is better on rockets
The first MIRV-armed missile is the LGM-30G Minuteman III
MIT Professor, Ted Postol, explained the Oreshnik and its implications in depth 10 days ago on Daniel Davis / Deep Dive. According to the U.S. Pentagon and other sources, the Oreshnik is an intermediate-range ballistic missile, or IRBM, not an ICBM.
Yep... and it's not even "ORESHNIK"
6:04 Not by Ukr, but just made and operated by the US.
No it's not operated by US personnel. Ukrainians were trained to use this system.
Please use imperial measurements ❤❤❤❤❤😊
Please use Klingon measurements
Good
Excelent video, please do more vidoes about different ICBMs of all countries.
Can you please do video about Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS)?
Correct me if I am wrong but the video of the impacts of this MIRV hit it looks like they hit in a group of 4 with 5 impacts in each group.
I was posting responses that the United States did invent the first functional Hypersonic missile, but I'd say this is a new video topic for @AiTelly.
From Kerala
Does that oreshnik missile differ from the satan 2? Is that a newly developed missile
Oreshnik hypersonic mirv long significant mobility
You said it was using solid rocket propellant, but you showed liquid propellant tanks
at hypersonic speed in could not connect to GLONASS (any GPS)
Worth mentioning that MIRV technology isn't anything new and IRBMs and ICBMs reaching hypersonic velocities is also nothing new. Both American and Russian ICBMs have been capable of hypersonic terminal velocities since practically forever.
I will hear the sonic boom and dodge all 6 of the explodey things
It's a IRBM a miniature version of the ICBM the technology is older than I am. The question is why are we still putting up with nuclear blackmail from Russia when we have Thad for IRBM's and SM6 for ICBM's.
LOL
@@andrewgordon235 sleep peacefully dear comrade
Watch the video again .
I feel like I'm getting harassed by the 50 cent Army
Israel would give Tel Aviv for this,in exchange 😅
Do you guys use c++ to simulate these animations
They use Blender
We also made the B2 Spirit BombeSpirit ruclips.net/video/r7BTJSiUejQ/видео.html Please take a Look
Combat Approved.
2087 can’t come sooner…
Pls how did you know much about this missile. Russian didn't give much info... am curious
Impressive! Looking forward to more videos! 🍭💝
Thanks!
@@Aitelly it's a bot
No worry about AI taking over any time soon with a video like this. 😂
Вы же понимаете что это оружие секретное поэтому точных данных и характеристик нет ни у кого!
0:52 looks to be liquid fuel but states solid fuel. Or maybe I have no idea what I’m talking about. lol
36!
six nuke🤔🙄🙄
How is RUS building these missiles with scavenged parts from Washing Machines? I 😂
Love from India🇮🇳
Amazing graphics.. But it feels like you're saying the same thing over and over again
Another ICBM? When Russia is gonna modernize his army they look like WW2 😂😂
I wonder if there's a way to intercept this missile?
The speed is so high (about 3 km/s) that the anti-aircraft systems do not have time to calculate the trajectory. Remember that they have to detect it, calculate its trajectory, aim and then fire (roughly speaking), so by the time they get to fire, the warheads have long since passed the interception point.
Боеголовки даже радары не увидят. Поскольку вокруг них образуется облако раскалённой плазмы.
If the US or any ally takes out Russian navigation satellites, how useless is this weapon?
Тогда Россия уничтожит американские спутники!
🎉
Rods of Gods
First 🎉❤
Worst
Based on American designs? Well, whatever cool aid you are sipping is ok.. Strangely, you couldn't even explain the 36 mirv.
A functional Hypersonic missile absolutely was first designed by the United States. You're likely not old enough to know it, but look up the Pershing ll missile equipped with the MaRV warheads.
Also, think about history, the United States had experimental jets going hypersonic back in the 1950s.
My favorite fruit
This is nothing new.Oreshnik(Huzel tree) is Soviet era technology.Very similar to american MS6 missile.
Finally
oreshnik aka babayaga
0:32 Эти двигатели лишь придают вращение, чтобы боеголовки летели точнее - та же логика что и у нарезных орудий. Да и как вообще, боеголовка может от чего-то уклонятся, если в ней нет электроники, то есть она даже засечь ничего не способна.
3:25 КАК?) Мда
You said it's based on American design? Does usa have this type of new missile I didn't think so ! Let's give a credit to Russian scientists I say Bravo Russian Bravo.
Yes we do... that's why he said it's based on American design. This is old tech. Cold war era.
A functional Hypersonic missile absolutely was first designed by the United States. You're likely not old enough to know it, but look up the Pershing ll missile equipped with the MaRV warheads.
@@kennedy188American hyperspnic missiles doesnt maneuver tho, russians are better at building missiles
@@husseintamemy2558 sorry but you're incorrect. The MaRV warheads were capable of maneuverability mid flight. Russia basically copied the design they learned about from the United States in 1987 as part of the Arms Reduction treaty.
@ i havent seen any american hypersonic missiles maneuver recently…
Quality of content is really deteriorating fast… for example you show the booster section with 2 tanks for oxidizer and fuel and you mention its a solid booster. That is just false. Please make your videos slower but more correct