Klipsch RP600m Speakers VS Triangle Titus EZ Speakers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 июл 2024
- I compare the Klipsch Rp 600m and the Triangle Titus EZ Speakers
in this video ! Enjoy !
see where these videos are on our tier list: www.patreon.com/posts/gear-ti...
Klipsch RP600m: (USA) funallaudio.com/us-internatio...
(Canada) funallaudio.com/canadian/loud...
Triangle Titus: (USA) funallaudio.com/us-internatio...
(Canada) funallaudio.com/canadian/loud...
Atoll/ Iotavx: (USA) funallaudio.com/us-internatio...
(Canada) funallaudio.com/canadian-stor...
Buying anything from amazon by clicking this link supports the channel, it will NOT cost you anything: amzn.to/2PYMTib
PATREON: / nbts
Instagram: / nbtstudio2017
Facebook: / next-best-thing-studio...
Twitter: / nbtstudio2017
#KlipschRp600m #TriangleTitusEZ #SpeakerComparisons
I have audition the Titus today, and I was very impressed with their fast in your face and punchy bass, from such a small speaker.
Great review man, very well done. Great pertinent, and helpful information.
Thanks for the amp matching advice
Excelent review. Thanks you!
Thanks for this, cause I'm caught up on triangle or dali. But this was useful 👌
Nice review!😊
It’s always good to know how these perform I wanted to get the rp-m600 for my System but they were more expensive anyway good review
Hi Amir, in my experience the soundstage they produce can be huge for their size, they work better at 40cm+ from the wall behind. The room I've used them in is approx 4x4x3 metres with an open staircase - no bass boom for me. They work well with valve amps too.
Good review I have a pair of 600's being delivered this week I only buy Klipsch
I sse the tektons in the back, have you ever reviewed those on you channel? i had the original Lore now i have the original Double Impact.
Nice comparison
Very interesting and articulate comparison/review. I have 'Triangles 30th Anniversary Comete and haven't found anything in their price range to beat them yet but have not listened to Buchardts yet either. I would love for you to do a review on these but they are a little bit hard to find because of the anniversary edition. There are other models though that are very comparable. Thanks so much for what you do.
Buchardts are coming ;)
The Next Best Thing Studio Oh kickass. I look forward to seeing that review but when I was actually talking about is reviewing some triangles that are very similar to mine or the actual 30th anniversary ‘Comete’s or whatever is very similar to them. Thanks
I recently bought a pair of 30th Anniversary Cometes. Undoubtedly a very high quality product.
I bought them because I have some hearing loss and the detail and revelatory nature of their signature sound returns some of the upper frequencies to me that are missing with other speakers.
I actually prefer the sound of DYNAUDIO, but their soft-dome tweeters, while offering romance and realism, are more subtle and as a result, I struggle to hear (as much) tambourine (or maracas or triangle) like I want to.
The 30 Ann Cometes reveal more upper frequencies with their very forthright delivery, but their presentation won't be to everyone's taste.
Given that the sky's the limit (money-wise) in the world of speakers, I know there are more perfect speakers for my personal condition out there, but in a price-range that I'll never be able to afford.
I'm growing accustomed to the 30 Ann Cometes, and am learning to love them, but if my hearing wasn't damaged I'd be a devoted DYNAUDIO fan.
@@markgc1316 Hey very cool mark. Thanks for the insight. Yes those little conical horns are pretty keen. I love them but am planning on building some kit open baffle Nxotica's from gnr research in the future.
Had the Klipsch. Sold it. They do certain things VERY well and in certain environments I might prefer the Klipsch but they just don't work for me. In my rooms they were fatiguing and tended be very picky on what kind of music they liked.
I didn't finish it yet but so far I haven't seen a reviewer mention that Triangle appears to be using exponential curve horns as are found in musical instruments rather than the tractrix curve that has become popular in the last two decades. The tractrix curve is shorter back to front but if it sounded better than musical instruments would be using it imo.
You have an accent that suggests english isn't your 1st language, but your english is perfect. It might even be better than mine, and I only speak english.
Pity
Good job, lil 1'.
Perhaps an interesting review woukd be the klipsch rp600m vs the smaller and closer in price triangle borea entry level at $500. If I recall this triangle speaker is twice if not 3 times more than the klipsch. Nice review😀
Would love a comparison between the Titus and Br03
If you are a tonal freak, have a listen to (and perhaps review) the Proac Tablette 10 Signature or Response DB1. I have not found any speakers except for Harbeths and Proac that plays music so well.
I am enjoying your videos... good stuff. Keep it up. But the Klipsch is half price of the Triangle Titus EZ. I understand the comparison they are both horn looking. While the Triangle Bro3 has a nice wide soundstage with a more mellow upper end.
Great review,you should check MAGNAT TRANSPULS 1500...probably the best P/Q speaker on the market.
what amp would u match with the triangle? would the schiit aegir be good enough for this?
i was going to get Klipsch rp 600m at 1st but once i saw the Triangle i just fell in love with it and sound amazing nice 2 ..
pls review the kef q150 vs the BOWERS & WILKINS 607 ! i love your reviews and trust your knowledge the most, other reviewer on youtube just talk about nonsense for 20 mins sometimes giving wrong information
Isn't there a new version of the 4311?
I think there is something to paper woofers. I hear it in my Sony SS-CS5 and JBL Stage a130 and a170. There is a growing trend of people stating there is no such thing as fast woofers.
I completely disagree. Inertia will always matter.
is Marantz pm6006 amp strong enough for speakers like this?
do you think Esprit Titus EZ have more bass than Borea BR03?
Will Triangle Titus EZ sound good with Denon AVR-X8500H?
Thank you for another nice review as always. Please do you tou think this Triangle Titus Ez can be a good match with my Musical Fidelity M6si? I'm not listened too many amps so I really don't know if my M6si is in the warm side or is more at the bright side of the neutral or natural.
Thank you again!
For what its worth, I think it would be based on what people state about the triangles. I have the Zetas which uses a titanium tweeter but a different paper woofer. It isn't as resolving as the more expensive speakers but still considered resolving, sufficient detail but higher end speakers show more transparency but the tweeter does show sibilant passages a bit more, so a bit more glare
I had the M2si and I found that amp a bit grainy and the bass was flabby. The higher end models per measurements I have seen have better damping factors so would expect tighter bass and probably less grain. I also have a hegel and a Keces which tend toward smooth which works with stuff I listen too but MF can work well with others such as rock.
MF is regarded as a bit warmer, but also a bit lower SNR and a bit more harmonic distortion vs other high end amps but shouldn't affect the Triangle in any negative ways and I expect the higher end models to be better than the M2si. Distortion levels decrease as you add volume as a couple of watts and above will drive these speakers to louder levels. If you listen at low SPLs, distortion will be over .1% but probably not an issue, my small amp is similar and its fine.
The only question is how that woofer will come across. I tried the Borea 2 and didn't care for it vs the cheaper Zetas. The Zetas give a wider stage and sound bigger than my Dali Opticon 1 an a bit more than ML 15i that I have, but the Borea sounded a bit bigger than the Zetas, which some like. For me, it seemed to exaggerate the sound but not sure if it was due to the woofer of the soft dome tweeter. I like the tweeter in the Zetas and think the Titus will display what I like with more resolution which is expected in the next step up. Not always the case but expected, even if just a little.
I found I preferred the Zetas to Quad S2s as well as the Dali Menuet SE. The Quad was fun with movies but sounded too mechanical with music, as well as a flat stage. The Dali was really nice and was as resolving as the Quad, both much more than the Zetas but I found it too refined taking a bit of the excitement out of the music. What the Dalis did well was provide a well defined image, had depth, high resolution, sounded natural, alot to like but lost alot of its charm more than 5 feet away.
The Triangle sounds great on every amp I tried, slight differences but class D, AB, high power, low power, its all good. very versatile but don't know how the higher end models will do. But for music I find the Zetas sublime in comparison to the others I have. Its first and foremost for music. The Dali is also versatile, give more weight to notes, good for both music and movies but sounds smaller but works well in my listening window at 8 feet (vs the Menuet) and doesn't have the detail refined out. The ML15i is best for HT, exciting, but a bit unnatural at times with certain instruments, like piano, as someone also had stated. I prefer the Dali for piano as well as the Zetas. The Zetas don't have the body but are such an easy listen but not warm, euphonic and still work well with movies that I wish I had another pair. Same as the Color bookshelf series. They are a bit v curved in my opinion.
So, I am also tempted by the Titus, had been for years but just don't know about that woofer. If you live in a damp/high humidity environment, it may affect the sound as well (Think Florida or deep Southern States). as the paper cone doesn't appear to be doped.
There are higher end products that give more, improved SQ, but not always sounding more desirable depending on what one responds to, that's my experience. At the current price, the Titus isn't cheap, outsourced to China which isn't really an issue if QC is maintained and is vinyl veneered vs real wood, which I would have preferred real wood at retail prices.
Hope that helps.
@@nc3419 First of all thank you very much for your helpful answer.
I finally bought the Titus from a second hand nice price, and was surprisingly the low frequences they delivery in that small cabinet and his small woofer. They have a really nice overall sound, specially with jazz, classical and vocals music, but I found some vibrations with electronic music from their bass reflex ports that ruined the experience, specially with tracks that have a very low frequences, so I sold them and for the moment still listening with my old Q-Acoustics 3030i, that is a fantastic speakers specially in his price range.
Now I'm looking to update my speakers with some serious options like the Dynaudio Special Forty or the ATC SCM 19, but still doubting and considering who would be the best option.
Cheers!
Are you going to review the Tektons behind you?
Yeah that's the main reason I'm here.
In every case including this case, we learn the Klipsch rp600m is a less refined rougher brighter rock speaker. Even the crossover network is a cheap 4 parts. The Triangle is far better and no surprise, twice the price, same as eg our #1 pick the JBL 530 and Revel M16... all these speakers are in a different category than the rp600 Cheers, Mario, Dragon Quartz Audio
Hello Mario, You are just mentioning the two speakers i'm comparing right now! in the beginning was thinking to buy the klipsch, then I heard some sound demos between the JBL and the Klipsch RP600m, and surprisingly, I find the klipsch is lacking some layers of the sound, specially the not-loud ones, like guitar licks, brushes, soft percussion ...etc, the JBL 530 is a beautiful speaker all around, and I was comparing it against the Titus ( despite of the price difference). Can you give me some insight here ? Thanks in advance :)
@@Henkesh999 Hi Amir, you are having alot of enjoyment comparing these speakers. I can give you some ideas between the Titus EX and JBL 530, However, I have not ever directly compared the two. Previously I owned the wonderful Triangle Zerius 202 series, wow I loved those speakers. they were dynamic and lively and articulate but never too bright. Now they were a tower speaker and even then, they were designed with less bass. They did NOT put out much deep bass, just I think down to around 50hz and then very sharply drop off. Hence, the bass was wonderfully fast and clear and Triangle are known for this. So, we can guess the Titus EX has a similar profile...very tight very nice but I will believe that the JBL 530 is going to deliver a fuller deeper bass. I can clearly hear a bit of a bass rise with the 530 at around 60hz, it is a quite deep bass frequency to have a bit of a bump, plus they roll off naturally around 42 hz with the port tuned to that frequency, hence they often sound like the bass is very satisfying and full. I really think to myself "where is the subwoofer" because there is plenty of bass coming from them. I doubt you will have the same experience with the Titus EX, clear tight articulate sound but with less bass. Ok, 2nd point, it is definitely the case that the JBL 530 throws a large big bold soundstage exactly because it is their intended design with the compression driver, including crossover point much lower to the compression driver tweeter at 1500hz. They sound BIG, they are NOT sounding like a smaller monitor or speaker with a tight nearfield listening profile. So I suspect Titus EX definitely going to throw a smaller tighter soundstage compared to the 530. Those are the two main distinctions I suggest to consider between these two. There is no way these two speakers have a very similar sound profile. Last point, JBL 530 is 86db spl 6 ohms. To sound fully great, it needs plenty of true amplifier power, the more the better,. The Titus EX is more efficient and will do very well even with 20-40 watts per channel. Have fun Amir! Cheers, Mario
@@mrmaschinaadventures Many thanks for your comment, I was about to buy the 530's after watching your rave review but thought I'd better go with the Triangle Comete EZ for a better refined output. I 'm planning to add a subwoofer at some point, so the low bass volume issue is not gonna be of a concern.
Since you had a Triangle for long time, I''m looking for a $1000 (or less) ss integrated amp to pair them with. any recommendations? thanks again :)
Nice presentation and explanations !
Do you think those RP600 will match an Yamaha amp AS801 ?
Somebody told me that the RP600 are too sensitive and the Yamaha AS801 pushing too much toward the trebble and metalic sound, which will makes a bad combo ?
But in the same time, those RP600 seems to have fix the trebble issue and the common critics of the Klipsch brightness and agressivity in the high end ?
Also, which amp do you suggest ?
Thanks !
Zero Fidelity was preferring the triangle to the Klipsch and now I see you did, too. Interesting. These triangle are $899 a pair? And why does the website say 2x5.25" woofer? I only see one woofer.
Dynamicality?
Interesting word.
I’ll have to use that!
Klipsch can be very unforgiving, which is what I like about them.
Supposedly, the updated horn shape and dampening material compared to earlier models or the Reference line, both of which I have, was made to help tone down brightness.
Positioning makes a difference as well.
Nice comparison!
whats the texture of the tractrix horn? is it rubberized or glossy?
myplaguesify it’s rubbery
"Dynamicality" is a rather covfefe word.
I have the Titus EZ's - highly recommended.
Hi Alongside Edge, do you feel the sound is small? What are the dimensions of your room?
@@Henkesh999 I had the Titus EZ and now i have the Comete EZ. About the "Small sound", it depends on your amplifier. I had a Yamaha RN-602, and now a Rega Elex-R. IMHO, the Rega Elex-R (warm sound) is the perfect match for the Titus and Comete EZ. I have a small/mid room: The Titus is a little bit for mid rooms, but the Comete are PERFECT.
I live in Peru (South America), and we had a local distributor.
@@rauld.s.4433 just bought the Comete EZ, and ur advice is just in time since I'm now looking for an amplifier that matches these babies. Anyways thanks a lot :)
@@Henkesh999 What's your impressions of the Comete EZ? Any comparisons to other speakers?
I have Titus ez with Ayre amplification and they are simply wonderful. Chosen over kef ls50 (better tonality, soundstaging, clarity,emotion) bowers and Wilkins (not as bright or insistent) and ATC (soundstaging and imaging better, more emotive and clarity) amongst others. They offer high end sound in these areas! Yes they are slightly bass light if you like rock / edm, certainly in a larger room would add a sub, but they offer so much elsewhere and bass is there and fast, so good for me!
I wonder if the 600 needs many many hours to smooth out?
I defiantly think so, when I first got them they were a little bright and lacking mid-range, 6 months later they have defiantly evened out and sound amazing, personally I prefer the sound with the grills on ( I know there beautiful and all) as it tames the high end just slightly, REW confirmed this as well as my ears
James Egan I’m going to buy these, but from what I’ve gathered,it sounds like I’m going to want to tame the tweeter a hair... 😒 (not a biggie)
I have the rp160m which is the last generation of the 600m. I put probably 100 hours in before it smoothed out alot. I bought another set for the rear surround sounds and immediately noticed they seemed brighter. I actually moved my old ones to the surrounds and the new ones to the front to give them more duty. I was happy i did
The Comete EZ is the big brother of the Titus EZ and it's almost exactly the same size as the RP-600M. The Klipsch RP-600M is 15.7 x 8 x 11.9 and the Comete EZ is 15.7 x 7.87 x 12.7. With the Comete you can have your cake and eat it too. Meaning the size, dynamics, and bass of the Klipsch with the Triangle clarity. 😁
Ye but he doesn't care, tomorrow is going to compare the RP600 with a tomato, and declare the tomato is the winner. That's why we like him.
bowers 606 or klipsch rp600? same price in my country.
myplaguesify what did you get?
I’m late to the party but good job.
I'm trying to decide, Triangle Titus EZ or KEF LS50? 😳
Slickman Elite had the same dilemma, until I auditioned in my home. I have ayre amplification and it was not really a contest, triangle was more emotive, more space in soundstage, better tonality, less Cold emotionally and better timing. Ls50 had more weight . Imaging was very close. I got the triangles, and adore them!
I have the Klipsch Rp 600m they are very smooth with my Rega P3 turntable and my restored vintage Marantz 2250b. Jazz, Blues and hard rock all sound clear solid and smooth. Imaging in my case is a slight toe in and each speaker on a stand 2ft. from the back wall and aprox 10ft. apart. I also use a Sony CD player when not listening to vinyl. Thanks for your input but you must use good quality sound source to really get a true evaluation. Garbage in equals garbage out. Check out the April 2019 review in Stereophile magazine. Or Steve Guttenberg's review on You Tube or CNET....
I used ps audio and meitner dac along with many quality sources. :) and it wasnt bright for me. But as I stated, some ppl did report it being so.
Triangle Esprit Titus EZ acabo de comprarlo para un bewitch 6550 ya comentere los resultados
How do the klipsch rp600m's compare to the comete EZ ?
I would like to know this as well since they are basically the same exact size.
@@Slickman2006 me too
How would the Triangle go with a Pass Labs Aleph 3?
I use with an ayre ax-7e and it’s wonderful with more expensive amplifiers, really stunning with the open, palpable quality of the ayre
triangle Esprit comete EZ has base ports on the front
Hey Man test the sound please ,you say and say and say and... Sound Comparison please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Klipsch is impressive for The Price 😲
I sound reviewed the Klipsch RP600M along with the Triangle Borea BR03 on Cambridge CX81. Triangle takes it decisively with clear "sound stage", cleanliness of sound, power and control. Klipsch was annoying to hear, noise in comparison to music.
Hi man, great informative video. Can you please help me with my question? I'm between the Klipsch Rp 600m vs the Kef Q350. Any suggestions ?
Thanking you
I blindly bought the Klipsch RP 600m + Yamaha RN 402 combo for 600 euro. The deal was too good to pass. But I almost regret it. The Klipsch just don’t have that warmth I was expecting from speakers. But they’re very punchy, clear and fun. I personally enjoyed the Q Acoustics 3020 more. And I would wholeheartedly recommend those over the Klipsch.
I agree. If I feed shitty files to my RP600M they will spit out absolute crap. Feed them crap and they will let you know, feed them good files and they give you a concert.
villegas24 while it’s true that better speakers will be or should be more resolving, that doesn’t mean they should sound worse on poor material.
@@Cujobob they dont sound worse in that sense but they will make the flaws of the files more apparent.
Use a Chinese SET with Russian tubes. Get Class A Krell level performance for around 500$ people should really wake up and realize a SET is a low power Krell...and will kick a First watts ass.
This is a good thing for the 600m IMO, its not a negative on the speaker but the source that is fed to it, if a speakers sounds good on bad recording that reflects badly on the speaker
@@dednside5229 Please clarify, where can I buy this?
Those speakers have sub-bass?
No bookshelf has sub bass.
I love your channel BUT, 4 ads in a 15 minutes video is too much for me.
A B If you sign up for RUclips premium I think it’s called RUclips red for like 10 bucks a month you never get any ads.
RUclips premium dude...
Steve Guttenberg had basically the opposite impression of this speaker.
I don't know who is right. I have not heard either. Just say'in
The Triangle is a mini bookshelf? It’s the appropriate sized one. More like the Klipsch is the oversized bookshelf.
The Klipsch look massive in my living room.
Welllll speakers like the Dynaco A25 and KLH 6/17 are considered bookshelf too...I wanna see the bookshelves people had in the 70s 😂
I would think the 600 needs a large living or listening room.
Hmm I live in an apartment and I have a pair being delivered this week so we will see
Over twice the price for the triangles. I'll go with the klipsch.
In France the Triangle is about the same price as the Klipsch, sometimes less. But the Klipsch are more often on sale. I got a sweet deal on the Klipsch.
I just don’t understand speaker comparisons that are not in the same class.
Thanks anyways
Other reviews make much of the dip in the graph at the cross-over, making these Klipsch speakers a no-no.
You may choose whatever criterion you wish to buy/no buy speakers but I suggest you listen to a pair of RP-600M. Then get back to us with your buy/no buy suggestion.
I own a pair of RP-600M and if you pair them with a 15" sealed sub the characteristic sound is very similar to my RF-83, the $2500 Klipsch flagship speakers when new.
Klipsch THE BEST!!! Ave Mrok
I’m just surprised how much klipschs are ugly. It is hard to understand because this is a legendary company with legendary and beautiful products . But they need to change their design team for their entry level and mid-level product range (from a design stand point of course.) They are still great products of course but design matters as well.
i don't have an iron but i fold my shirts after the dryer
As Neil Young opined, “A man needs a maid.” Good review. 😎
Having big problems with Titus. Not matter what amp I match with doesn'st sound "right". Sounds like some big dip in midrange maybe. Very forward treble. Tried many room positions still sound not balanced. Not recommended.
They work very good with nuprime ida 8. They need about 300 hours running in
@@e.p.2218 I brought them to local hi end dealer and they said the speakers were putting out alot of distortion.
I found Triangles to be a bit laid back with a bit less body in the mids in comparison to other brands. I have the Zetas and it works well with music for an easy, airy listen, but it has a doped paper cone, nothing special but it works really well with the Titanium driver. Well balanced for me, in regards to resolution, detail, dynamics, etc. Just a bit of glare if there's alot of sibilant energy which I mostly notice with movies but typically some TV shows which I think are bumped up in those frequencies for people with internal cheap speakers in their TVs are soundbars.
The different cone in the Titus is the question. I didn't care for the Borea 2 but it has a soft dome which didn't have the magic of the titanium. Not sure of that woofer either. More resolution in Titus expected but may have similar sound to the Borea. Just not sure.
I think Triangle works well with class D.@@e.p.2218
Мятая футболка
Jay, iron your d@mn shirt man! UNSUBSCRIBED!!!
Joking, LOL! Love ya, Jay!
Just buy JBL 705p and call it a lifetime
Klipsch are beautiful
I wish Klipsch would try a paper cone .
Klipsch Heritage series.
sorry super noob, paper cones break easily?
@@stormsdarwin8767 Yes they do. I have an original pair of Klipsch Heresys that I bought new in 1980. Around 1990 I had to have one of the woofers reconed because my cat clawed it out. The shop that reconed it asked me if I wanted something (I'm not sure what it was called) applied to the cone so that it wouldn't happen again. It was like some kind of thick clear coat that they brushed on. So I said sure, why not (and they also applied it to my other woofer). I still don't know what they used, but the woofers sounded better (tighter bass). I'm still using the speakers on my secondary system and they still sound great.
Please wash your shirt, thanks.
I promise it was washed. just not ironed 😂😂
@@Jayiyagi, Just messing with you man😂, great review, i'm loving my Triangles..
@@Jayiyagi ironing is sooooo overrated
Bla bla bla... boring speculations. Need music samples to HEAR.