4K51 Rubezh BROM | Yugoslavian Deterrence of Aggression Weapon

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 янв 2025

Комментарии • 93

  • @Justin-rv7oy
    @Justin-rv7oy 3 года назад +85

    It's amazing how modern the MAZ-543 looks despite being a design that is well over fifty years old.

    • @vincere_
      @vincere_ 3 года назад +12

      That might have to do with the modern designs themselves not having any 'major' visual changes.

    • @Justin-rv7oy
      @Justin-rv7oy 3 года назад +4

      @@vincere_ true

    • @shanepatrick4534
      @shanepatrick4534 3 года назад +3

      If it works amd looks good why change it?

    • @Vapourwear
      @Vapourwear 3 года назад +1

      50 years is a flash in the pan.

    • @MikoyanGurevichMiG21
      @MikoyanGurevichMiG21 3 года назад +6

      Fun fact- the F-15 and the F-16 are all going to turn 50 in 5 years. And with the constant upgrades, they'll see a lifetime well over half a century.

  • @comentedonakeyboard
    @comentedonakeyboard 3 года назад +59

    "Great weapon, never fired in anger
    Now available for sale"
    Yugo ad

  • @jernejfunkl8300
    @jernejfunkl8300 2 года назад +14

    In 1989 i was stationed like soldier recruit (Yugoslav people army) in Mali Lošinj and saw this beast in alive.They brought him in to the center of barrack and put it him in to the battle position (like picture shown at 5:30).I was really impressed what i saw in that time.

    • @stopitas5790
      @stopitas5790 2 года назад

      Ves?

    • @jernejfunkl8300
      @jernejfunkl8300 2 года назад

      @@stopitas5790 ???

    • @stopitas5790
      @stopitas5790 2 года назад

      Ti služio Jna nisi . Samo još jedan forumaš koji živi u iluziji.

    • @jernejfunkl8300
      @jernejfunkl8300 2 года назад +1

      @@stopitas5790 Možda ti živiš u iluziji :)
      U Mali Lošinj sam došao negdje sredinom rujna 1989. godine u prekomandu.Tamo sam služio kao mehaničar pješačkog naoružanja do 17. lipnja 1990. godine.Pozadinska zgrada bila je prva lijevo od kruga, a radionica oko stotinjak metara uzbrdo na levo prema gornji kapiji vojarne. Ako vas još nešto zanima o ovoj vojarni, slobodno pitajte.

    • @stopitas5790
      @stopitas5790 2 года назад

      @@jernejfunkl8300 Ves?

  • @TheSlugstoppa
    @TheSlugstoppa 2 года назад +3

    I spent many long hours on my radar watching the coast of the F.R.Y. aboard an R.N. warship and was very well aware of the threat posed by this system.

  • @aydincakiroglu1665
    @aydincakiroglu1665 2 месяца назад

    Very detailed documentary, thanks

  • @ChristianThePagan
    @ChristianThePagan 3 года назад +10

    The thinking behind the assignment of Cold War bort-numbers has always hovered somewhere between semi-rational and the metaphysical.

  • @1joshjosh1
    @1joshjosh1 3 года назад +13

    That video clip of the 88 mm gun and the captured Mauser rifles was awesome

    • @vanja2565
      @vanja2565 3 года назад +4

      Captured? ahhahahaha those are domestic.

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 3 года назад +1

      @@vanja2565 wat? How?

    • @vanja2565
      @vanja2565 3 года назад +10

      @@kajmak64bit76 serbia/yugoslavia produced mausers before and after the great war, as well as after ww2

    • @1joshjosh1
      @1joshjosh1 3 года назад +2

      @@vanja2565
      oh yah....
      I forgot about how many they produced.
      Lots.

    • @1joshjosh1
      @1joshjosh1 3 года назад +2

      @@vanja2565
      And now I have to go watch some RUclips things on Yugoslavian Mausers.
      Fresh up my memory

  • @shanepatrick4534
    @shanepatrick4534 3 года назад +27

    450kg hollow charge? Wow, must have planned to use that on American battleships.

    • @jlvfr
      @jlvfr 3 года назад +14

      Close. The primary target of soviet SSMs were the west's carriers, hence their size. And this is actually small, the old AS-6 had a warhead of 1 ton.

    • @S300V
      @S300V 3 года назад +7

      In this case hollow charge means efp. It has lower armor penetration but greater after armour effects. The KSR2 (AS5) had 850 kg of this type and could penetrate 300 mm but after that it would tear the ship apart. This was mostly for smaller ships like destroyers/cruisers.

    • @shanepatrick4534
      @shanepatrick4534 3 года назад +4

      @@jlvfr The shipwreck they make is a very deadly weapon. Also the new hypersonic hotness everyone wants.

    • @bornatodoric6059
      @bornatodoric6059 3 года назад +8

      At the moment I am reading a book about Yugoslav navy and it is told that yugoslavia was stuck with dealing with P 15 rockets and soviet systems because negotiations with france about buying their rockets has failed , and the introduction of rocketships with yugoslav naval force was a quick answer against italian introduction of missle boats - so basicaly yugoslavia was stuck with bunch of these rockets that were not so good because they were easy to intercept -so yugoslav strategy changed when they wanted to shoot alot pf these missles on targets in prder to stop enemy to intercept a huge number , everything changed in late 80-s when yugoslavia gained sweedish rockets but then the breakup occured and all of the swedish missles were now in croatian hands and it is the reason Yugoslav navy didnt go too close to the croat shores arount the city of Split from the 1991-onwards

    • @S300V
      @S300V 3 года назад +5

      @@bornatodoric6059 Although the P15 was a dated design, Yugoslavia also used the improved P20/P21 variants too. These weapons were still fairly effective in the 80s as the various defense systems against them were not very reliable.

  • @westfailia
    @westfailia 3 года назад +9

    i really like this narrator, good job butane!

  • @marisacursedisame8413
    @marisacursedisame8413 3 года назад +9

    Nice narration, I find it great to have some variety

  • @legio-IV-Cataphract
    @legio-IV-Cataphract 3 года назад +12

    The mexican military should have adopted this vehicle

  • @Atreid3s
    @Atreid3s 3 года назад +18

    Great video very informative.
    My only criticism might be that the narrator perhaps doesn't have the best presentation/narration voice IMHO.

    • @pavelalexe9254
      @pavelalexe9254 3 года назад +8

      Donate on PayPal so we can pay better narrators ;)))

    • @glhmedic
      @glhmedic 3 года назад +4

      I think he sounds good. Not sure why you think.

    • @Atreid3s
      @Atreid3s 3 года назад +9

      @@glhmedic because his voice is not personally appealing to me compared to other narrators I've heard on this channel.
      It's not a dig or a slight against this narrator personally, not at all.

    • @marisacursedisame8413
      @marisacursedisame8413 3 года назад +1

      @@pavelalexe9254 This narrator is fine though honestly

    • @pavelalexe9254
      @pavelalexe9254 3 года назад +1

      @@marisacursedisame8413 I like him too, he's very clear

  • @fonesrphunny7242
    @fonesrphunny7242 3 года назад +1

    3:00 If you're talking about a lot of numbers, show them on screen please.
    Also, please be more consistent. You called the missile "P one five" and "P fifteen" within a minute.

  • @fonesrphunny7242
    @fonesrphunny7242 3 года назад +1

    Such a sexy thing! Still not done with my 1/35 Trumpeter :(

  • @cropathfinder
    @cropathfinder 3 года назад +2

    Ok i don't have a written source for this but i have access to and have often talked to military and civilian veterans of the croatian side and i have heard mention of the captured vehicle and it is a bit of an enigma as they honestly don't know. Also as croatians were capable of replacing the electronics as at the time Croatian and to a lesser degree Slovenia were disproportionately advanced in tech field and Croatian tech institutes readily supplied the military during the war from night and thermal sights for tanks and anti tank guns (included some of the reserve WW2 vehicles that got these) to UAV's for recon. Given how the battle ended there really are only 2 outcomes for the vehicles and that is that per agreement it was turned back over to the YPA along with some other captured assets which is the more likely of the outcomes and the second one being that it was "lost" which means scrapped or sold via black market.

    • @matovicmmilan
      @matovicmmilan 2 года назад +2

      Did they drop you on the head during infancy?? You "the Croats" were advanced in technological field?? I remember how "advanced" you were so much so that in order for Croatia to even participate in the M-84 production, Đuro Đaković factory had been designed to be equipped as a place of final integration of tank parts.
      There has always been disproportionate lack of Croat crews in all military projects and in regard to thermal sights, Croatia lacks such indigenous technology even today, let alone 30 years ago. That UAV which you used in 1995 was an American design given to a certain firm located in Zagreb!

  • @aleksazunjic9672
    @aleksazunjic9672 3 года назад +10

    Overall, the system fulfilled its function, as NATO did not attempt amphibious invasion or any kind of marine landing. Too bad that Yugoslavia did not have SAM system of similar quality to deter aerial aggression .

    • @Swindle1984
      @Swindle1984 2 года назад

      To be fair, they didn't know it was invisible.

  • @jarminmartinez-villatoro9844
    @jarminmartinez-villatoro9844 3 года назад +10

    Not really the biggest fan of this narrator.

    • @_gungrave_6802
      @_gungrave_6802 2 года назад +2

      Voice may be a little annoying but at least you can understand him better than half the narrators they use for their videos.

  • @user-ql7sc7uh3o
    @user-ql7sc7uh3o 3 года назад +3

    David Tapp you must be a professor of history. read a little about the jasenovac and handzar division...

  • @williambenedictalava2634
    @williambenedictalava2634 3 года назад

    No Issue on the narrator of this vid due to the reason clarity of presenting the info of the costal battery system.

  • @viktorplatson4121
    @viktorplatson4121 3 года назад +1

    Маразм крепчает...

  • @newsdz8053
    @newsdz8053 3 года назад

    🇩🇿😁🚀🕹️

  • @DrDakotaX
    @DrDakotaX 3 года назад +10

    I agree with the previous comment,
    Not a fan of this narrator.

    • @rubberwoody
      @rubberwoody 3 года назад

      Any reason?

    • @DrDakotaX
      @DrDakotaX 3 года назад +2

      @@rubberwoody i would have to say tone of voice. Somewhat feminine in nature. Doesn't fit the subject matter.
      Cadence is slow as if they are trying to read the script all in one take, yet still made mistakes.
      Inflection in voice at weird times in the sentences.
      Overall couldn't finish the video.

    • @rubberwoody
      @rubberwoody 3 года назад +1

      @@DrDakotaX agreeable I suppose except for the first point.
      What about tanks needs to be masculine?

    • @DrDakotaX
      @DrDakotaX 3 года назад +2

      @@rubberwoody absolutely nothing,
      However i prefer videos such as this to have a masculine sounding narrator.
      Personal preference.

  • @elforeigner3260
    @elforeigner3260 3 года назад +7

    Yugoslavian deterrence vanished in Vukovar 1991

  • @ymishaus2266
    @ymishaus2266 3 года назад +1

    Don't use this narrator again, please.

  • @mes621
    @mes621 3 года назад +5

    This Narrator sounds kinda hot ngl.