Can This Thing Dogfight ? F-15E Strike Eagle Vs F-16C Viper | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS |

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
  • Check out the Store: growling-sidew...
    CHECK OUT THE MINI DOCS CHANNEL: ‪@Mini_Docs‬
    Join the channel if you wish to support
    / @growlingsidewinder
    If You'd like to Support the Channel on Patreon:
    / growlingsidewinder
    Join my Discord:
    / discord
    Social Media
    ________________________________________________________
    Instagram: / growling_sidewinder
    Twitter: / growlingaim9
    Facebook: / growlingaim9
    Amazon Links for the products I use if you're interested:
    _________________________________________________________
    Link for Thrustmaster 16000M: amzn.to/3pdK0jP
    Link for Trackir 5: amzn.to/3NnAaUh
    Link for Warthog throttle/stick: amzn.to/2Vbfhyp
    Contact me:
    GrowlingSidewinder@hotmail.com
    Disclaimer: Please Note that I use sound effects to enhance my videos for dramatic effect and hopefully give the viewer more immersion and also I use reshade for some better colors. (you can download reshade yourself and use it to make your DCS look like mine).
    Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core 3.4GHz (4.9GHz Max Boost)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS Elite WiFi
    Memory: 128GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE RGB PRO 3200MHz (4x32GB)
    System Cooling: CORSAIR H100i PRO XT RGB
    Graphics Cards: NVIDIA 10GB GeForce RTX 3080
    Operating System: MS Windows 10 Professional
    Operating System Drive: 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe
    Hard Drive: 2TB Samsung 980 PRO
    Power Supply: CORSAIR AX1600i ATX Titanium
    Tobii Head and Eye Tracking: www.tobii.com/
    Virtual Reality: Pimax 8KX
    HeadTracker: Trackir5
    Thrustmaster F/A-18C Hornet stick and Warthog Throttle.
    Thrustmaster TRP pedals.
    On this channel we like to do a lot of dogfighting most videos are some sort of dogfight between 2 different aircraft as we explore their different capabilities. From time to time I like to dabble in Virtual Reality, I think VR is a great new technology and I love to show that stuff off for the channel from time to time.
    If you enjoy war thunder or Microsoft flight simulator 2020 or even dogfighting in Battlefield 2042, consider getting yourself into Digital Combat Simulator by Eagle Dynamics, the Combat side of Aviation with the BVR and Dogfights really provides a different and interesting perspective on aviation. You can fly all kinds of combat aircraft including the F-16, F-15, F-14, JF-17, Su-27, Mig-29, Mirage and the F-18 Hornet along with many other aircraft and helicopters like the Ka-50 and Mi-8.

Комментарии • 743

  • @GrowlingSidewinder
    @GrowlingSidewinder  Год назад +34

    Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/
    Thanks for watching guys and I hope everyone is enjoying their Strike Eagle. If you have any ideas for future videos let me know in the comment section below and maybe we can get them into the pipeline. Thanks again and much Love.

    • @fgtrdfgtyh5755
      @fgtrdfgtyh5755 Год назад +2

      Su 57 vs F104 Starfighter lol

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 Год назад +3

      Please fly The AV-8B VS F-35B guns only Dogfight!🙏👍

    • @keithhoss4990
      @keithhoss4990 Год назад

      Even though it was a slaughter it was still a fun video to watch! 👍

    • @verticalfracture
      @verticalfracture Год назад +2

      can we get a battle of the thicc girls the F-15 vs F-35

    • @Confederate_States_of_America
      @Confederate_States_of_America Год назад

      Could you please do I dogfight between the p-26 and the su-57

  • @EB-vz1ob
    @EB-vz1ob Год назад +126

    I have a friend who is a retired Viper driver and was in the Aggressor squadron. Several years ago I asked him about the Strike Eagle. He laughed and said, "yeah, we used to stay out of burner to be nice!"

    • @rhysgoodman7628
      @rhysgoodman7628 Год назад +11

      Damn that must burn for the Mudhen guys! Though they are pretty much bombers anyway.

    • @StrikeEagleDriver69
      @StrikeEagleDriver69 Год назад +30

      @@rhysgoodman7628 It doesn't bother us at all. The vipers are usually dead before they see us. It pays to have the best radar. ;)

    • @Flyingcircustailwheel
      @Flyingcircustailwheel Год назад +1

      ​@@StrikeEagleDriver69you need two men for everything though! 😂

    • @StrikeEagleDriver69
      @StrikeEagleDriver69 Год назад +12

      @@Flyingcircustailwheel Who do you call when you need the most equipment carried? Two men and a (bomb)truck. 🤣

  • @Tuuvas
    @Tuuvas Год назад +214

    Solution: give your WSO a pistol and pop the canopy. That'll stand a better chance at getting bullets where they need to be lol

    • @andreasvogel5644
      @andreasvogel5644 Год назад +5

      😂😂😂

    • @jimlthor
      @jimlthor Год назад +12

      Going back to WWI strats. We've come full circle

    • @Easy-Eight
      @Easy-Eight Год назад +3

      I can see the proposal to congress to retro-fit Strike Eagles with Lewis Guns and an adapted "high tech" MG mount from a Bristfit.

    • @recoilrob324
      @recoilrob324 Год назад +1

      After watching a bunch of these videos I'm wondering just what the guy in back is supposed to be doing? Isn't the weapons deployment HIS job?

    • @alexturnqest6202
      @alexturnqest6202 Год назад

      Not the ww1 recon plane tactics.😂😢

  • @Mb-cn8ql
    @Mb-cn8ql Год назад +248

    Can we just acknowledge the aero modeling at 10:00 watching the vertical fins shake like that while you’re uncoordinated? Impressive modeling from the developer.

    • @timmy3822
      @timmy3822 Год назад +33

      I hope the quality of this module dispels the opinion of many that Razbam are “bad” module devs. They had their missteps sure but this thing is an absolute work of art.

    • @christianperez8037
      @christianperez8037 Год назад +3

      yes he already did a video covering the small details on the f15e

    • @Laerei
      @Laerei Год назад +17

      I over-Gd the Strike Eagle hard and was suprised to see that the wings had become bent upwards. And it didn't control as good anymore.

    • @jimlthor
      @jimlthor Год назад +2

      ​@@Laereidamn. I wanna see that

    • @termitreter6545
      @termitreter6545 Год назад +2

      @@Laerei F-14 has some stuff like that as well. F16/18 are pretty lacking in their damage model, sadly.

  • @gustavolrcoelho
    @gustavolrcoelho Год назад +34

    "It's called a STRIKE Eagle, not a DOGFIGHT Eagle, God damn It!" - Some project engineer at Boeing, probably.

    • @kasrakhatir
      @kasrakhatir 19 дней назад

      *Cue Pentagon Wars theme

  • @RAAFLightning1
    @RAAFLightning1 Год назад +509

    Welll... this fight is like a nascar vs an F1 car. Built for different purposes. The viper should win every time, if the pilot knows what they are doing.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Год назад +162

      Not just win, should win handsomely

    • @AnthonytheAmerican
      @AnthonytheAmerican Год назад +38

      As a NASCAR and Viper Fan this comparison makes me oddly happy

    • @geod5
      @geod5 Год назад +74

      ​@@AnthonytheAmerican IM GUNNA DRIVE STRAIT, AND THEN IM GUNNA TURN TO THE LEFT SOME TIMES.

    • @AnthonytheAmerican
      @AnthonytheAmerican Год назад +17

      @@geod5 yeah well at least NASCAR has passing

    • @BARelement
      @BARelement Год назад +33

      NASCAR did Le Mans recently.

  • @lorenzotelleria4200
    @lorenzotelleria4200 Год назад +177

    Can you do a video comparing the C an E model in a dogfight? Would be cool too see the difference in capabilities as dogfighters.

    • @rango_gt
      @rango_gt Год назад +3

      considering the e has cft and the c doesent it should be pretty clear but itll be fun to watch

    • @SaftonYT
      @SaftonYT Год назад

      @@rango_gt CFT?

    • @user-rs1fo2dd9b
      @user-rs1fo2dd9b Год назад +1

      @@SaftonYT control flight thruster

    • @cabreraman6969
      @cabreraman6969 Год назад +1

      ​@rango_tf CFTs can be added to both the C and E and without the CFTs the E version is as almost as maneuverable as the C but with higher thrust

  • @keithhoss4990
    @keithhoss4990 Год назад +240

    The Strike Eagle (among those in the know) is notorious for poor acceleration and bleeds off energy very quickly in the high g environment. No match for the viper in a dogfight.

    • @SPFLDAngler
      @SPFLDAngler Год назад +2

      High g for the Eagle is 4

    • @keithhoss4990
      @keithhoss4990 Год назад

      @@SPFLDAngler Yeah, isn’t max G for a Beagle 6.5?

    • @Coole501
      @Coole501 Год назад +11

      @@keithhoss4990 max on a clean E model is 9, same as the other F-15 models. Now once you start slapping ordnance on it’s a different story, but the HUD reads out the calculated G max based on loadout and in this video you can see it is reading out 9 since the only thing loaded are a couple AIM-9s.

    • @kaijohnson5033
      @kaijohnson5033 Год назад +8

      @@keithhoss4990the C model will rate with a Viper all day long if the pilot knows what he’s doing. The mudhen is a pig.

    • @keithhoss4990
      @keithhoss4990 Год назад +3

      @@kaijohnson5033 Yeah, I know. And we called the Viper a lawn dart. Are you C model or Viper? No one in the F-35 or F-22 calls the fourth Gen names. 😂 The Mudhen is the most Capable CAS aircraft known to man.

  • @caleblarsen5490
    @caleblarsen5490 Год назад +97

    So basically the F-15 went from "not a pound for air to ground," to, "we only pound the ground."

    • @oldfashionedwrx3574
      @oldfashionedwrx3574 Год назад +10

      BVR it's good though lol

    • @OverlordAntares
      @OverlordAntares Год назад +1

      ​@@oldfashionedwrx3574Better hope you have a flight of Vipers or Eagles nearby in case the enemy sneaks up on you.

    • @oldfashionedwrx3574
      @oldfashionedwrx3574 Год назад +6

      @@OverlordAntares they'll always have escort lol

    • @OverlordAntares
      @OverlordAntares Год назад +2

      @@oldfashionedwrx3574 Rip the solo Mudhen players lol

  • @darthtytherous2107
    @darthtytherous2107 Год назад +121

    I thought at first that since it’s an F-15 variant that it could dogfight. Needless to say I learned it’s not a bfm dogfighter the hard way after I merged with a MiG-21.

    • @SPFLDAngler
      @SPFLDAngler Год назад +7

      I couldn’t even fight a MiG-15. It’s so disappointing.

    • @KingMen1Force
      @KingMen1Force Год назад +29

      ​@@SPFLDAnglerWell the MiG-15 turns better than the MiG-21

    • @madaxe606
      @madaxe606 Год назад +27

      As a MiG-21 guy, you'd be surprised what our humble Balalaika can do.

    • @immortaldev1489
      @immortaldev1489 Год назад +4

      The C model is pretty capable in a dogfight

    • @MaverickCulp
      @MaverickCulp Год назад +4

      @@madaxe606Fellow MiG-21 driver here. We really can do some nasty things with our little plane.

  • @therocinante3443
    @therocinante3443 Год назад +93

    Very interesting, I didn't expect it to be such a big difference from the C. I guess the conformal tanks and all that extra weight are a much bigger hit to the BFM characteristics than I imagined.

    • @beetlusjuicus4013
      @beetlusjuicus4013 Год назад +15

      I think it’s more of the cfts weight and drag than the planes weight itself as the engines are a lot better than the f15cs

    • @Ghoster311
      @Ghoster311 Год назад +15

      The cft’s also put g limits on the aircraft that are crippling.

    • @termitreter6545
      @termitreter6545 Год назад +30

      @@beetlusjuicus4013 The F-15E itself is also heavier, its structure and wings had to be strengthened to carry heavy bomb loads.
      CFTs matter with drag, though, thats true. You see those pylons sticking out of the CFTs at awkward angles? They are apparently incredibly draggy.

    • @SPFLDAngler
      @SPFLDAngler Год назад +5

      If we were allowed to remove the CFT it wouldn’t be a problem. Those things basically make the Strike Eagle what it’s usually called. A Mud Hen. In a WVR fight, it’s just a fat chicken.

    • @daviddorminey1434
      @daviddorminey1434 Год назад +9

      I've always heard that a mud hen without CFTs is like a C but with more power, but the are rarely flown that way, it should be interesting when the EXs become more prevalent as they will be flying without CFTs mostly.

  • @SabertoothedFrostbite
    @SabertoothedFrostbite Год назад +5

    I'm noticing a lot of people in the comments aren't making the distinction between the f-15e variant and the f-15c variant. The e variant is a completely redesigned aircraft for ground attack, it may look like an normal f-15 but it performs entirely different.

    • @KyoushaPumpItUp
      @KyoushaPumpItUp Год назад

      What about the F-15EX?

    • @SabertoothedFrostbite
      @SabertoothedFrostbite Год назад +2

      @@KyoushaPumpItUp from what I have heard it is inbetween the two in terms of maneuverability, as a missile truck however it works phenomenal as it has better radar and electronics.

    • @KyoushaPumpItUp
      @KyoushaPumpItUp Год назад

      @@SabertoothedFrostbite thanks

  • @Reaper_03-01
    @Reaper_03-01 Год назад +10

    Now I am the world's biggest Eagle fanboy, but the Mud Hen shares only its basic silhouette with the F-15D.
    There is over 1,200kg worth of reinforcing of the airframe to strengthen it, necessitating the more powerful GE F-110 engines over the P&W F100s in the F-15A - F-15D and its export derivatives. There is also the somewhat reduced by far from negligible affect that the CFTs (Conformal Fuel Tanks) impose on the airframe of the Mud Hen when compared to a pair of traditional drop tank.
    Now the F-15EX shares little with the lineage of both the Eagle and Mud Hen, aside from its silhouette. The EX has a fully digital control system, so the older hydraulically actuated control surfaces are out with electric motors now taking inputs from the pilot via the new fully digital flight computer and moving the control surfaces. The EX is also supposed to be lighter, given that its airframe incorporates a greater percentage of composites over alloys than the -C and -E Eagles. The EX is also designed with open architecture systems, which makes incorporating new weapons and upgrades a much simpler endeavour over aircraft like the F-22 which were designed and built before the advent of open architectures.

  • @bobdonovan34
    @bobdonovan34 Год назад +80

    I'm one of the ones who thought this thing was going to dominate as a dog fighter. Then I took it out for my first flight and quickly realized I better learn the ground attack role if I want to get some use out of the aircraft.

    • @DylanStahl
      @DylanStahl Год назад +9

      As compared to the Air Superiority Version, the Strike Eagle has many pounds for air to ground, which is what does this to it - it can BVR, clearly, but it's not an ACM king.

    • @Laerei
      @Laerei Год назад +12

      Hey you can do BVR, it has a powerful A2A radar and can carry soooo many missiles. It should be able to outlast most other fighters in BVR combat.

    • @georgecharleston8532
      @georgecharleston8532 Год назад +2

      I can’t imagine it being that far off from the c, it flies in DCS like it has a large bomb load even though it’s clean.

    • @dreaminknight
      @dreaminknight Год назад +17

      ​​@@georgecharleston8532CFT.. talk to F-15E drivers and they confirm that the CFT still produces a lot of drag. Thats why the F-15Cs are flying with dropable bags (and why the F-15EX will mostvprobably fly without CFT in A2A missions.

    • @maeckknox6535
      @maeckknox6535 Год назад +6

      @@dreaminknight we haven't even orderd CFT's for the EX squadrons

  • @migcap7356
    @migcap7356 Год назад +44

    The issue with the F-15E is the CFT on the jet. Once the F-15C were removed from England a few of the Strike Eagles were reconformed without the CFT which give the Eagle much better performance. They did this because they needed Eagles that could do Combat Patrols in Poland late last year and this.
    I didn't fly E models just the Abinos, aka C's and in reality when you removed the tanks you have an hoped up C model with better intergraded systems because most are newer version of the F-15C.
    It's one of the questions I need to ask RASBEZ in a forum if the tanks can be removed because I love to see how they perform w/o them.

    • @crash8926
      @crash8926 Год назад +3

      RB already said they are not removing the. CFT’s.

    • @xela79
      @xela79 Год назад +3

      RB said they wouldn’t be removing the CFTs because then they would have to make a new flight model.

    • @NoSteponSnek69
      @NoSteponSnek69 Год назад +4

      Thats a shame. No-CFT F15Es with 229s have dominated BFM tourneys against albinos, lawn darts, bugs and cats. Such is the enduring problem of the dark grey. MX doesnt want to drop the CFTs, RAZBAM doesnt want to drop the CFTs.... BVR and ACM for all my friends!

    • @migcap7356
      @migcap7356 Год назад +5

      @@xela79 I thought so... That's the point w/ USAFE removing the CFT's. It changes the flight characteristics completely... The F-15EX is a completely different animal under the skin, slightly larger w/ full fly by wires and total upgrades. Like flying a 738 and being handed the keys to a Max8...

  • @Nathan-vt1jz
    @Nathan-vt1jz Год назад +5

    My guess is this is how the J20 would perform in dogfighting. It’s also a missile truck, large, heavy, and low power to weight ratios (the engines aren’t very good).

  • @joelhume
    @joelhume Год назад +11

    Its important to note that not being a good dogfighter is not the same as not being good at air to air combat. An F15E with eight AMRAAMs/AIM9X is a very good air to air fighter because of its powerful sensors, speed, thrust, long range and combat persistence.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Год назад +7

      correct, dogfighting is only a portion of "air to air capabilities" BVR is the major component.

  • @fen3532
    @fen3532 Год назад +4

    Strike Eagle really deserves to be called thunderbolt II, unlike the A-10 whitch is just a random slow strike aircraft...

  • @texasabbott
    @texasabbott Год назад +2

    Some USAF F-15E's have been conducting air-to-air exercises since January 2023 with their CFTs removed. While F-15E's with the F100-PW-220 engines and no CFT's performed similarly as the F-15C's, F-15E's with the F100-PW-229 engines (adding 11,000 Ibs. or 24% more total thrust) and no CFT's could prove a formidable adversary. There is no shortage of players who would be willing to pay for the F-15E flight model with no CFT's.

    • @mro9466
      @mro9466 Год назад

      Just fly the F18 or F16 if you want to dogfight ...

  • @mrblablablabla
    @mrblablablabla Год назад +3

    4:18 "Errrrr... eh, I guess we"re not doing a parachute...??" LOL XD

    • @dm8994
      @dm8994 7 месяцев назад

      I knew somebody else found that hilarious.

  • @40kmphASMR
    @40kmphASMR Год назад +10

    Your Strike Eagle videos will contribute significantly to this year's Moments-of-Death compilation.

  • @lockhartmatthew
    @lockhartmatthew Год назад +27

    Now I'm curious to see a F15C versus a F15E.

    • @MikePasqqsaPekiM
      @MikePasqqsaPekiM Год назад +5

      F15C should win.

    • @termitreter6545
      @termitreter6545 Год назад +3

      The F-15C in DCS is arguably a better Dogfighter than the F-16. Its worse^^

    • @Brody961
      @Brody961 Год назад +2

      ​@termitreter6545 same with the f18. Specifically in dcs I can hold 430 in the f16 and still get out rated by an f18. The f18 is super op. To your point im curious about the F15s nose authority in dcs as well lol

    • @BadMooseRecords
      @BadMooseRecords Год назад +1

      The flaming cliff f15 should get that flight model put on as well.

    • @Alamo-a2a
      @Alamo-a2a Год назад

      kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk the f15c its preety dawn good in the 1 cicle and 2 circle, but it not the best in any of those

  • @jklappenbach
    @jklappenbach Год назад +8

    One thing the fight between the F15 and the Su57 made clear, if the F15 wants to dominate in the intercept role, it's got to be able to dominate BVR. And to do that, the AIM120 is not going to do the job.
    We really need the AIM260s for the load out.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Год назад +3

      I would imagine this statement is accurate

    • @Anderson_Hwang
      @Anderson_Hwang Год назад +1

      Then youll be totally disappointed. The F-15E was literally the last aircraft in the entire US military to get the AIM-9X. Any air to air upgrades will come to the F-15E last.

  • @adamw2911
    @adamw2911 Год назад +12

    F15E v Tornado F3 close in would be interesting. As would Tornado F3 v F15C BVR with awacs support etc. The F15 on paper wins...but in actual exercises the F3 did surprisingly well.

  • @syntience_wings
    @syntience_wings Год назад +11

    Well this is an eye opener to me. Based mainly on the train hype I was expecting it to be not dominant for sure but at least manageable in dogfights.
    I'm sad now for my f15 dreams 😂

    • @fisadev
      @fisadev Год назад +2

      don't be sad! just do good BVR, for which the mudhen is a beast, and you will never have to worry about tiny jets turning around you xD

    • @syntience_wings
      @syntience_wings Год назад

      @@fisadev this is a good advice :)

    • @johngeiger3770
      @johngeiger3770 10 месяцев назад

      Well, it's an ammunition truck designed for long range SEAD not WVR.

  • @Ghoster311
    @Ghoster311 Год назад +22

    Can you remove the CFT’s from the Strike Eagle? That should make a huge difference if they modeled it. The USAF has been removing them from some SE’s and using them in place of high mileage C models.

  • @ziadajam5433
    @ziadajam5433 Год назад +10

    This video really helped put into prospective how agile the 16 is. I know so many die hard F-15s that would bring up the KD of the 15 to say it would beat the 16. I’d love to see a match including BVR and possibly a merge if the 16 can survive long enough

  • @salutarydreams520
    @salutarydreams520 Год назад +8

    Would be interesting to see F-15C vs F-15E dogfight.

  • @jameskester7745
    @jameskester7745 Год назад +4

    I don't know why people don't believe physics doesn't apply to their favorite aircraft

  • @macgyver186
    @macgyver186 Год назад +1

    When the F-15 hit the water and you said "splash one" it gave me a chuckle.

  • @kawasaki8051
    @kawasaki8051 Год назад +7

    Exactly why the USAF is taking off CFT's on alot of the F15E's

    • @pkpnyt4711
      @pkpnyt4711 Год назад +2

      Actually, all the EX versions they're getting, they opted not to have CFTs. There were some Es they removed the CFTs to compare performance, but there are still a ton of Es that are solely bomb trucks and need the CFTs.

  • @arzhangsadeghi
    @arzhangsadeghi Год назад +10

    Thank you so much for the dogfight , I really wanted to see how it performs, I really appropriate your timer and effort.

  • @stefanoferreri
    @stefanoferreri Год назад +12

    now i'm curious about the F-15C vs F-15E in both dogfight and bvr

    • @keithhoss4990
      @keithhoss4990 Год назад +5

      C model has one of the best air to air radar’s in the world and turns much better than the E. It is an an Air Superiority fighter whereas the E is a multi role fighter/bomber. Air to Air the C model will win regardless of the envelope.

    • @stefanoferreri
      @stefanoferreri Год назад

      ​@@keithhoss4990 i understand it but keep in mind that it's the FC3 variant, not as detailed and similar to reality as the E variant is, so it might turn in the high fidelity bird's favour instead of the low fidelity one. that's the only reason i'm interested. but yes generally speaking there is a reason why the C variant is called EAGLE and the E one is called STRIKE EAGLE

    • @keithhoss4990
      @keithhoss4990 Год назад +2

      @@stefanoferreri In Air Force Pilot training my class leader was a Strike Eagle WSO before coming to Pilot training and this is exactly how he said Dogfighting would go in a Strike Eagle.

    • @stefanoferreri
      @stefanoferreri Год назад

      @@keithhoss4990 i'm not saying that the E variant is the best dogfighter ever, i'm just saying that due to the low fidelity model of the C variant maybe the E variant could potentially kill it. the FC3 models in DCS are low fidelity and do not correspond perfectly with real life aircrafts whereas the high fidelity ones are pretty similar in terms of performance. Being aware of this i just said that i'm curious about seeing these two engineering masterpieces going in a direct fight, being dogfight and/or BVR. I'm not talking about real life, i'm talking about a simulator.

    • @coreyp9211
      @coreyp9211 Год назад +2

      If you take the CFTs off of an E, it would outperform the C in every way. The E has a much better and more modern sensor suite.

  • @HalcyonAD
    @HalcyonAD Год назад +17

    It can too dogfight.... poorly.

  • @angeryitalianchef7251
    @angeryitalianchef7251 Год назад +1

    such a shame, the old F-15A/C were literally built for aerial dominance dogfights. "Look how they massacred my boy"

  • @_dexcon_7008
    @_dexcon_7008 Год назад +1

    Ok but now in really need F15C vs F15E didn’t think the F15E would win but pfeeeww this is real disadvantage in BFM. So I wonder how the F15C would do. Great video btw :) as always

  • @meanman6992
    @meanman6992 Год назад +1

    I bet when a lot of people were thinking dog fight, they were thinking BVR not guns. Which you could easily argue is not a dog fight. I’d think the F15EX is going to be a huge BVR threat though since it’s got such a powerful radar and can carry so many missiles. A fighter has to make it to the merge, and what is it 16 missiles he can take? All he has to do is keep shooting at you and pushing and if he runs out, just go home and re-arm.

  • @dryphtyr
    @dryphtyr Год назад +1

    F-16 sans AB is still basically an A4 Skyhawk on steroids.

  • @salmanGT4
    @salmanGT4 Год назад +1

    Dogfighting with just guns against a Su-57 would be laptop flipping frustrating!! Lol 😂

  • @DrakenTandem
    @DrakenTandem Год назад +5

    I’m interested in f-35 vs f15e and AJS37 vs f15e, how ab that ???

  • @EurofighterTyphoon_
    @EurofighterTyphoon_ Год назад +1

    What about a Dogfight beetwen the F15E and Harrier or the A10? I think that would be very interesting.

  • @homercowell7295
    @homercowell7295 Год назад +1

    You should make a challenge video to see if someone can depict whats happening in a dogfight only by the sounds

  • @rubensakols
    @rubensakols Год назад +5

    we need this fight in bvr‼️

  • @piconano
    @piconano Год назад +1

    The lighter the aircraft, the better it can dogfight.
    Mass and inertia are brothers.

  • @jwn2003
    @jwn2003 Год назад +3

    MiG 31 vs F-15E! I think that would be an interesting dogfight.

    • @TymaDem
      @TymaDem Год назад +1

      Lol, the dogfight between two flying bricks, should be quite the show

  • @JoDaddy1222
    @JoDaddy1222 Год назад

    "I guess we're not doing the parachute" SPLAT! I was dying!
    I love your commentary! And you're a damn hoss on the stick!❤

  • @xSpcManSpiffx
    @xSpcManSpiffx Год назад

    "I guess we're not doing a parachute? " SPLAT 😂 4:16

  • @clevercat5844
    @clevercat5844 Год назад

    OMG when that parachute didn’t open & that spat sound 😂

  • @gwcrispi
    @gwcrispi Год назад +6

    Max Afterburner is going to have to weigh in on this one. You're in his pride and joy now.

    • @gwcrispi
      @gwcrispi Год назад +2

      He's going to point out that you need to repeat this matchup BVR.

  • @VocalTheKing
    @VocalTheKing Год назад

    "I guess we aren't doing the parachute?" Had me rolling.

  • @realQuiGon
    @realQuiGon Год назад +2

    I would love to see another video with the F-15E against the F-16, but at high altitude. The F-15 performs so much better up there, while the Viper struggles in thin air. So if you really wanna dogfight in the F-15E, do it at high altitude.

  • @mikemontgomery2654
    @mikemontgomery2654 Год назад

    Couldn’t help but notice your Bombardier survived, after the second death. 🤣🤣

  • @rickmasseur2008
    @rickmasseur2008 Год назад

    This is the perfect title from the perfect person to ask the question.

  • @ralfhtg1056
    @ralfhtg1056 Год назад +35

    Where this idea came from? Easy answer: The F-15 was invented as an air to air platform, which includes the ability to dogfight. And since the Strike Eagle is a derivative of the Eagle, it should also be able to dogfight.

    • @harshmasiwal5257
      @harshmasiwal5257 Год назад +24

      Man, did you graduate from the prometheus school of aviation and aerodynamics ☠️

    • @crash8926
      @crash8926 Год назад

      @@harshmasiwal5257 no shit bro

    • @ryz_vik
      @ryz_vik Год назад +5

      It can dogfight, it just can’t do shit against a peer competitor 😂

    • @erikarmstrong7769
      @erikarmstrong7769 Год назад

      Apparently not lol

    • @ww.x0
      @ww.x0 Год назад +1

      yes just like anything with a gun "can" dogfight, numbnuts

  • @getahanddown
    @getahanddown Год назад +1

    People can pick the sillouettes of each plane but have no scale.
    F15 is 25% longer, double the engines, twice the dry / base weight and twice the loaded weight.
    For a turning fight less mass + size wins.

  • @jfiery
    @jfiery Год назад +2

    I wasn't worried about dogfighting the Strike Eagle, I was worried about BVR with it's radar coupled with a DL.

  • @brianlindsey3620
    @brianlindsey3620 Год назад +1

    It’s going to be interesting if the usaf accepts Raytheon’s Perigrine missle…. I envision a scenario where f35/ngad, have peregrine, and th ex and f18 are carrying aim 260’s, them 260s will be coming from 150 miles away via stealth datalink, while the Mach 5+ peregrine will be launched via stealth within an enemies M.A.R

  • @ohalrighthen4301
    @ohalrighthen4301 Год назад

    Fighter Mafia with cigar smoke: "Dude, I told you so".

  • @Ronburgundy449
    @Ronburgundy449 Год назад +4

    Nice to see they finally gave the F15 the dogfighting capability of the jet it was built in fear of, the Mig 31 😂

  • @timtreeborgsonjen1533
    @timtreeborgsonjen1533 Год назад +1

    Put a ball turret behind to he cockpit on the bomb truck.

  • @user-rb5hu4sk7u
    @user-rb5hu4sk7u Год назад

    Thanks for validating my experiences so far! I was getting tired of screaming “how are they behind me already!”

  • @IamVF301
    @IamVF301 Год назад +1

    The F-15E was meant to replace the F-111 supersonic penetration bomber, the main reason (to my knowlage) is that a modified F-15 is still kinda and F-15 so it can defend itself (at longer range)

  • @idiedoof4339
    @idiedoof4339 Год назад +1

    I saw that the strike eagle had conformal tanks. Would taking them off change its performance?

  • @Metal2Mesh
    @Metal2Mesh Год назад +2

    That is why I had to get a damage model out for early access.

  • @d3us3xmach1na5
    @d3us3xmach1na5 Год назад

    He tried to flare your chutes haha.
    I’d just go into the merge and then keep running away.

  • @hellcat611
    @hellcat611 Год назад +1

    I’d be interested in an F-14A vs F-15E fight.

  • @JuanmaBaiutti
    @JuanmaBaiutti Год назад +1

    Now I want to see the tomcat kicking his a55

  • @bdog7262
    @bdog7262 Год назад +1

    I absolutely love the viper!!! Can’t wait till we get the block 70/72

  • @Stinger522
    @Stinger522 Год назад +3

    Do some air to ground action in the Strike Eagle. Any further dogfights with it are just torture at this point.

  • @madaxe606
    @madaxe606 Год назад +1

    The build quality of the Strike Eagle makes me even more hyped for the MiG-23!

  • @diannafiredal
    @diannafiredal Год назад

    "I guess we're not doing the parachute?" 😂

  • @Ken_Koonz
    @Ken_Koonz Год назад

    We need more these videos showing both sides of the fight! Very informative.

  • @rorycolquhoun7840
    @rorycolquhoun7840 Год назад +1

    F15E vs F35????? Battle of the big boys? Could be interesting! 🤣

  • @rocketpunchgo1
    @rocketpunchgo1 Год назад

    4:21 was that seriously a "splat" sound effect lmao

  • @andrewchr
    @andrewchr Год назад +1

    I guess that's why they slapped a powerful radar so that it can BVR better than anyone else. If you are not good in something, it's important to excel in something else, to cover up your weaknesses.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Год назад +1

      thats right, good luck getting to the merge against this thing, especially if it has AWACS support.

  • @High_Alpha
    @High_Alpha Год назад +1

    Wondering if the difference here is not only the 'bomb truck' design and cft's but also the Eagle doesn't have LEF's or LEX's... so attempting to do all that high alpha stuff is going to not work. You're asking an F150 to turn a corner at 120 like a Ferrari. With the extra weight it doesn't have the brute force of the C to get around that.
    I'm wondering if the F16I has the same issues given it's basically a "Strike Viper". (although, yes, like the og Viper it has LEF's)

  • @michaelscruton7270
    @michaelscruton7270 Год назад

    The F15-E sometimes goes by the nickname 'Mud Hen' for a reason....

  • @StudSupreme
    @StudSupreme Год назад +3

    Which plane has the better climb rate? I'm wondering if the 'bomb truck' with two engines could take this to a vertical two circle and have a chance.

    • @Mike_Romeo
      @Mike_Romeo Год назад

      No, too much weight and drag. Su-27 or MiG-29 should have the best climb rates due to their small weights and fantastic aerodynamics and strong engines

    • @StudSupreme
      @StudSupreme Год назад

      @@Mike_Romeo OK, I see. It's beginning to sound like the F-15E is more like the MiG-31. I may be overgeneralizing, but it's sounding that way to me. That might be a fun dogfight, come to think of it.

  • @andrewrogers3067
    @andrewrogers3067 Год назад +10

    Now THIS is the start of us finding out whether it can hang among the 5.

    • @dreadlock375
      @dreadlock375 Год назад

      What're the 5?

    • @HereticsRight
      @HereticsRight Год назад

      @@dreadlock375 My guess: F15, 16, 18, Su27(/33), and then either F14, Mig 29, or Mirage 2000? Probably not the Mirage since it has no real Fox 3s but it can at least dog fight.

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 Год назад

      @@HereticsRight f18, F16, mirage, f14, and either flanker or eagle (c). For bvr it changes to F18, F16, F14, Eagle, Jf17

  • @Amvienttz
    @Amvienttz Год назад +2

    Would love to see it perform with the Hornet. Results are going to be obvious but still interesting to see.

    • @joshburke4083
      @joshburke4083 Год назад +3

      Or it vs a F model Super Hornet considering both do similar missions.

  • @ruiliu4157
    @ruiliu4157 Год назад +1

    Wow, this makes the F-14s look even more amazing! I thought the Strike Eagle could fight similarly to a Tomcat 😂 But hell no - even with supposedly better engines

  • @GreenTea-101
    @GreenTea-101 Год назад

    Next matchup: Dogfight a F-16C vs you in an AC-130. I think you might have a chance!

  • @Chu6um
    @Chu6um Год назад

    Great example of the adage 'proper tool for the job'.

  • @zzodr
    @zzodr Год назад

    So basically Zone5 outta there if you see an F16 and live to fight another day.

  • @abd733.k
    @abd733.k Год назад +9

    GS you mentioned the Mig-29 vs the strike eagle, I'm actually interested to see how would that end.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Год назад +6

      Me too lol I’ll put it in the pipeline

    • @abd733.k
      @abd733.k Год назад +1

      @@GrowlingSidewinder can't wait to see that, the Mig-29 is fast and agile compared to the Strike Eagle, I don't know maybe we'd find a somewhat comparable performance to the Viper, or maybe not, either way best wishes mate.

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 Год назад

      @@abd733.k somewhat comparable to the viper in what?? BFM?? Hell no. BVR?? Maybe, but the eagle has no datalink and the radar is quite clunky. Also no jammer.

  • @eggbun
    @eggbun Год назад +2

    It's like a fight between a sniper rifle and an assault rifle. Both serving different purposes but can ultimately beat each other in their homefield.

  • @henrikfabricius761
    @henrikfabricius761 Год назад

    It would be interesting to see how the F-15E would perform in it's primary role, being an Air Interdiction Fighter/Bomb Truck. A scenario in which it would have to go deep into enemy territory and take out some key installations and at the same time try to pave it's own way through enemy SAMs and ADFs.
    All based on your immagination and skills.

  • @Justin-dv7ul
    @Justin-dv7ul Год назад +13

    strike eagle seems like quite a formidable fighter overall, good radar and good bomb load

    • @preppen78
      @preppen78 Год назад +4

      Which version of the F-15 has the best fighter capabilities?

    • @freddarau
      @freddarau Год назад +15

      @@preppen78 The Eagle 2, other known as the F-15EX, is the most capable Air to Air eagle.

    • @mattiaciucciove8084
      @mattiaciucciove8084 Год назад

      ​@bumbleboy12old piece of junk

    • @justinjerskey
      @justinjerskey Год назад

      Is there such thing as the F-15 B?

    • @keithhoss4990
      @keithhoss4990 Год назад +9

      @@freddarau Not fully loaded with 16 AMRAAMs in a dogfight. The C model would be better suited in that environment. However if the EX had already shot off most of its AMRAAMs then yesterday it would be better. Overall I agree the EX.

  • @TheBigJil
    @TheBigJil Год назад +2

    Could you make a playlist of all of the songs you use in your videos please.

  • @Anton_Kalgin
    @Anton_Kalgin Год назад

    How about F-15E vs Su-30SM intercept? With GS flying one than the other, so we could see the duel from both perspectives.

  • @SVTL4799
    @SVTL4799 Год назад

    F-15E Vs F-15E!!!! Back in the day that’s all we had and we loved it!

  • @mrkiki-fc2vf
    @mrkiki-fc2vf Год назад +6

    Yeah she can't dogfight... BUT WE NEED THE F-15C VS F-15E come on man

  • @montrose699
    @montrose699 Год назад

    Yup its a BVS fighter for defense not a dogfighter or in the merge bird. It has other things its amazing at

  • @benhardsatrio8222
    @benhardsatrio8222 Год назад

    Well, at least the Mudhen’s RWR tone is not bad to listen to. There’s that XD

  • @kbklt1
    @kbklt1 Год назад +1

    Well I guess the big test would be against fat Amy then

  • @maverickmissile801
    @maverickmissile801 Год назад

    Im lovin this strike eagle content, and how you just keep doing different stuff with the eagle.
    Video idea:
    Dogfights thru the eras. Gen 1-5 fighters from the US fight their counterparts in the USSR/Russia.

  • @arthurthedented
    @arthurthedented 4 месяца назад

    I thought the power-to-weight ratio let the F15 accelerate past Mach in a straight vertical climb... not useful against missiles but it doesn't get them out of guns? and how does it wind up so slow and low when its got that massive overthrust? (not saying its a dogfighter but thinking maybe it has different strengths that weren't being played to here?)

  • @malusignatius
    @malusignatius Год назад +1

    How does it compare to the F-15C when it comes to dogfighting?

  • @AtlasFox
    @AtlasFox Год назад +1

    I just want to say my RIO/WSO and I took on a Flanker yesterday to see how the Strike Eagle can merge. It did not go well and I thought I was just being a bad pilot. I feel vindicated after watching GS struggle

  • @alexandresilvestre4416
    @alexandresilvestre4416 Год назад

    And what if both has a AG loadout and meet for a dogfight? Haha... Love the viper