If feels so cool to see you go you go to actually playing this deck after seeing you first react to simultaneous equation cannons (I'm the UK nats guy that originated the maths lab deck). Congrats on the strong showing even though you narrowly missed out on top cut.
@@tomsaer705 That's cool, it's really nice to see the profile was helpful! I really wanted to take it to euros but sadly I can't really travel to bigger events at the moment.
When he was doing the stream with pak and it was clear that nothing really works against yubel if you don't do something different like he did at worlds it really makes sense that he also cooked up lab for the ycs. It's literally the anti-yubel lab deck from MD but made for the tcg. And now that tenpai also comes to MD i think lab will be a good anti meta call if you build it accordingly.
Something you should've considered if you were going to go all-in on a low-search engine build of Lab was a single copy of Labrynth Barrage in case you needed to surprise someone with a second activation of a HOPT card. Because lets be honest: no one would've saw that coming. I personally don't play the funni cannon (i'm a Dogmatika head, so I run ED dump targets with GY effects). Punishment is an incredibly strong card in Labrynth, and even if it might be an Ash target, you could always just run 1 Ecclesia and some copies of Nadir to ensure you get ED dumps to reduce the chances of getting negated by other hand traps like Veiler or Imperm before you get your ED dump. Plus it helps you thin your main deck before you resolve cards like Duality or Demise. (I would've maybe swapped out a Duality for a Prosperity if i'm not playing the math card) The only additional cards you would've had to worry about in the Dogmatika Package build would've been cards like Called By or Droll, but given how slow and grindy the Labrynth deck is, it wouldn't really impact you that heavily unless you just happened to draw multiple copies of Nadir. I would've probably ran 1 Ecclesia, 2 Nadir, 2 Punishment, and had a link target like Artemis to make off of Ecclesia so you could get her from the field and into the GY in the event you opened your 1 Ecclesia and a Nadir. In that situation, you just wouldn't fire off Ecclesia's search effect so that you aren't locked out of the ED until you fire off Nadir. It would require proper sequencing, but it could totally work. Arias is also really good obviously, but main decking her would've ruined the surprise factor. I would've sided her in going second, resolving D Barrier on turn 0 sounds absolutely hilarious.
Nice deck, but Lord in the main would be better in most game 1 cases and also allow you to reduce the Lady ratio in your deck from 3 to 2 (which would be better). You should also consider running draco-utopian aura in the main in place of compulsory because that is 2-3 more copies of solemn strike which makes your going second even better for dealing with Omni negates.
Such a cool deck. Lord is such a slept on card. Agreed on compulse but yeah theres not a lot of other cards except for like Torrential Tribute which unfortunately isnt as good as it used to be as well
@@knmrt2760 Daruma / IDP / Terrors / Sim Equation Cannon when the opponent's setting up his board can be insane. He didn't go with Arias for the same reason he didn't play Arianna if I had to guess
@@sparesomerunesplease3683 I think it wouldn't do much in the gameplan he was going for... Set 5 going first and going second he purposely wants his opponent to play their full turn and spend their extra deck resources there would be no real reason to use Arias here to stop the opponent.
Firstly, is it even worth playing? He's not even playing imperm. Impulse does nothing to help you break a board... and a common theme with his card choices is they are either blowouts (sphere mode, daruma, cannon) or they help you resolve the blowouts by forcing or stopping the negate. Impulse does neither so I would be surprised if he played it at all.
Hey Josh idk if you considered it or not but did you try Lilith, Lady of Lamat for trap lab, it's basically Arianna but it dodges all the hand traps (it tributes it self on quick effect for cost to set any 3 of trap card) but conflicts for the normal.
@@ayham613I dont agree its duality, most of your traps are 3ofs so lilith automatically resolves and it only conflicts with sphere mode so 2 lilith could be ok, but yeah it would require some testing
2:20 Hangon, ima open TCGplayer to factcheck this as you go through, I'll be back with an edit. (Also it is possible that a lot of these cards changed in value since you picked them up so it might not be your fault) Edit: Price breakdown according to TCGplayer. Prices are in USD and may fluctuate depending on market ect so I'm posting kinda an "average" here. Also your friendly local card shop may or may not use the same kinda price breakdown for their cards, but if anything a loooot of these cards will likely be cheaper because you might find them in a bin of common cards.) Main Deck: ~ 88.80 USD (ish, with some variance, a lot of these traps are staples, depending on where you get them they might be more or less and obvs if you're a baller you could double this price to pick up QCR Ladys who are 10x more expensive than the standard rarity) Extra Deck: I'm not calculating this, you could play anything but the Runic Fusions are probably required and they're not that pricy seemingly. You could get 1 of each for approx $10. Side Deck: ~166.5 (but 150 of that approx depending on the time that you look it up is the Mulcharmys.) Even with that, an 8-3 swiss deck for ~300ish (probably less tbh but you could put whatever you want in the extra deck), and for less than $150 or realistically lower since you may already have many of the common staples like Duality Solemn Lava Golem or D-Barrier. Like, *I* could build this deck and the only thing I would need to buy is the Labrynth Cards, the Sphere Modes and Heavenlys, and I think the evenly matcheds because I haven't played for a long time and I have zero.
Curious on the decision to not play Arias. Did you feel the difference between going 2nd, setting the traps, and passing back and going 2nd but using Arias to cannon or equation them during their turn to not be consequential? Maybe the Compulses can just be Ariases?
I think Arias is way too neggy. It's -2 for using one trap, which in this format many decks can push through even if used optimally just because of the crazy extension available. I feel like the idea here is "let them cook" and out advantage eventually, which arias doesn't really help with
Arias is also bad going 2nd into Yubel since they Phantom very early. And Arias is definitely getting negated by Phantom. And going 1st it does nothing in this deck.
@@shirohiruka it tecnically does something tho, but if you arent playing Arianna, it can be weird, because, you can get Arianna Acess, then Welcome into Lady for a draw, and thus speeding ur deck, also it enables virus setups, since you can't really "search" virus with Lady without some speed to get into Clock and the Welcomes.
man singing the song why trap decks should actualy be really strong in modern yugioh. if just we would get more good trap cards than something from literally 20 years ago. that you can do "full combo" going second and your opponent cannot interact with you doing so unless we start to print more cards like s:p really should make this stronger than it is
@@AlphaSquadZero well, there was Twin Twister discarding a Danger that pops a backrow, but that is still only a 2 for 3, not a 1 for 5 like HFD or Heavy Storm. Do you want a Cosmic Cyclone style Harpie's Feather Duster? Cause that kind of wishing on La Jinn's lamp is gonna get you a "pay 1400 for each target, banish that many spell/traps on your opponent's field." card that puts you down to 1k LP turn 2.
The sheer fact that they can interact with it turn 3 will make setting trap absolute horrible since it already depends heavily on the meta. This meta simply choosed negation instead of poping/banishing interaction in the end board, in the Ryzeal/Malice meta or SE-FireKing matchup setting 5 can be punished very hard
Its cool to see this deck, ive been wanting to play it for a while and with the format constantly changing i had no clue what was good in it, also i saw that the left out the field spell is it a bad card to play or is it just optional?
Im curious what alternative you would use as replacement for the purylia 🤔 Im actually building this list now but I dont want to dump the money on them. Thanks for all the content! Ive been learning a lot about the game from you and Pak.
Why did you decide against the dogmatika punishment? It looked pretty crazy with garura and n'tess in that one MD worlds game. Or one or the other paleozoic, wouldnt they have fit to your deck?
He wanted as few Hand Trap targets as possible, and relying on a Punishment, which could get Ash Blossomed, was not part of that goal. the entire Extra deck was dedicated to not being LIGHT or DARK to avoid feeding enemy Bystials. Aside from the obligatory Runic cards. Everything else was to get a WATER, WIND, FIRE, or EARTH extra deck target.
Is there a "good" replacement for the cannon? i lack too many extra deck monster to play the card, and i dont want to pay for those, eventhough they dont cost that much and the card is insane. What could i sub it with?
I assume it's Chain Link 1: Your Dark Ruler No More Chain Link 2: Their Spell or Trap (maybe Escape of the Unchained?) Chain Link 3: Their Desirae, targeting your Dark Ruler No More
Vanquish Soul is his ideal Fighting Game. Also, Frame 1 is a pretty common term in any videogame, and has been popularized enough to be used outside of gaming.
Josh talked about the Extra Deck monsters not wanting to be light/darks, but how would they ever hit the gy as he's not playing i.e Ultimate Slayer. Same goes for the fact that he won't be able to resolve the gy eff of Fossil Warrior or is he specifically talking about his Opponent somehow extradeck looping him.
It's exactly that. Dogmatika wasn't technically a consideration, but if a 'free' slot can give you a 5% winrate against a 0.5% matchup, you take it instead of a card that goes 0% for 100% of matchups.
super Video wie immer ich hätte eine Frage und bitte wäre es möglich dir deine wcs sleeves die roten von 2024 abzukaufen eine Rückmeldung wäre sehr nett liebe Grüße und einen schönen Abend noch /falls nicht wo kann man sie kaufen lg
Bro, just added Ra Sphere Mode to my Mekk-Knight SuperHeavy Samurai Deck, last Friday i tied to Yubel, because one of my Link-2 felt from the table and I didn't see it during the combo at duel 3, later beat a Runick White Forest, but lost from Runick White Forest Toy 😂 and Memento later, because I don't know the Deck enough and I didn't shuffled the Horse with Lib 😅
Replace 1 sphere mode with either ultimate slayer or a stall card like scapegoat. You could also just cut 1 and not replace it but my OCD doesn't like that.
You obv need the Runick fusions if you're going to play the Runick quick-play spells. Other than that you just need fusions and xyz with the right levels. You don't need to play the same ones as Josh.
Desirae can target a face up card at any point in a chain to negate it, while you can’t respond to DRNM with monster effect you can chain a different card like the Unchained traps in Yubel and then chain Desirae target DRNM to negate it.
I can't believe he finally played Mathmech.
Don't let Josh distract you from the fact that EU allowed plants to make it to the finals again 🙏
Wait again?
*a NA player allowed plants to go to the finals (he ghost ogered dryas with sowing in grave 😂😂)
@@johannkohlderhoff6190 lol, EU still responsible for the earlier rounds, sure plants didn't exclusively face NA players throughout the tournament
ruclips.net/video/ljF3l9vZ1Gg/видео.html
@@TheDjdeath45julius will join ycs niagara falls next week and we can see what NA player do if julius or jessica come to the NA :))))))
If feels so cool to see you go you go to actually playing this deck after seeing you first react to simultaneous equation cannons (I'm the UK nats guy that originated the maths lab deck).
Congrats on the strong showing even though you narrowly missed out on top cut.
I played an extremely similar list at Euros this year, and just missed out on day 2. Appreciated your profile from Nats when I saw it!
@@tomsaer705 That's cool, it's really nice to see the profile was helpful! I really wanted to take it to euros but sadly I can't really travel to bigger events at the moment.
@@L3w157 I’d like to talk to you more about the list for new format, would you be down?
@@tomsaer705 Potentially for a little bit. Time is slightly limited for me for the moment though.
Usually when I try to resolve the Equation Cannon, I forget to add Kurt Angle to the mix, so my chance of winning drastically goes down.
Underrated comment
It sounds like your opponent is a genetic freak that had 141 and 2/3 chance of winning
The numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at the next YCS
@@LoonaJinx Jokes on you, Europe doesn't get YCS events ;)
This needs 33 1/3% more upvotes.
We were this close to making Air Neos a YCS topping card
Who?
HE FINALLY ADMITTED HIS SECRET LOVE TO MATHMECH
He fucking didnt
So josh is tsundere after all?
Josh really just played the closest thing in the meta to paleo 😂
Josh: "No monster more than 5 bucks."
Air Neos: 👀
I also like a trap that's a math reference, it's called superfactorial and I think you would like its deck :)
I love how the deck is fairly affordable IRL and then you open it up in MD and it's just UR central, never change Labrynth.
I like math too, especially the 3 Runick Cards + 1 Runick Fountain = 3 draws.
ruclips.net/video/ljF3l9vZ1Gg/видео.html
*times
Rumour has it nobody has heard off josh since he uploaded this profile.
The Air Neos incident
When he was doing the stream with pak and it was clear that nothing really works against yubel if you don't do something different like he did at worlds it really makes sense that he also cooked up lab for the ycs. It's literally the anti-yubel lab deck from MD but made for the tcg. And now that tenpai also comes to MD i think lab will be a good anti meta call if you build it accordingly.
Trade offer : You can play a budget deck to top an event, but you have to be a rocket scientist in order to play it.
Or just have enough luck. Lab is pretty terrible this format, and that comes from one that plays lab.
You got next YCS Josh, I'm actually building Lab rn so this gave some inspiration
Lol silly fanboy
The 4 Worst Enemys for a Yu-Gi-Oh Player.
Place 4: Generic Toolbox Decks.
Place 3: Tier 0 Decks.
Place 2: Stun.
Place 1: Math.
Today i learned about math runick
Something you should've considered if you were going to go all-in on a low-search engine build of Lab was a single copy of Labrynth Barrage in case you needed to surprise someone with a second activation of a HOPT card. Because lets be honest: no one would've saw that coming.
I personally don't play the funni cannon (i'm a Dogmatika head, so I run ED dump targets with GY effects). Punishment is an incredibly strong card in Labrynth, and even if it might be an Ash target, you could always just run 1 Ecclesia and some copies of Nadir to ensure you get ED dumps to reduce the chances of getting negated by other hand traps like Veiler or Imperm before you get your ED dump. Plus it helps you thin your main deck before you resolve cards like Duality or Demise.
(I would've maybe swapped out a Duality for a Prosperity if i'm not playing the math card)
The only additional cards you would've had to worry about in the Dogmatika Package build would've been cards like Called By or Droll, but given how slow and grindy the Labrynth deck is, it wouldn't really impact you that heavily unless you just happened to draw multiple copies of Nadir. I would've probably ran 1 Ecclesia, 2 Nadir, 2 Punishment, and had a link target like Artemis to make off of Ecclesia so you could get her from the field and into the GY in the event you opened your 1 Ecclesia and a Nadir. In that situation, you just wouldn't fire off Ecclesia's search effect so that you aren't locked out of the ED until you fire off Nadir. It would require proper sequencing, but it could totally work.
Arias is also really good obviously, but main decking her would've ruined the surprise factor. I would've sided her in going second, resolving D Barrier on turn 0 sounds absolutely hilarious.
Oh my god, i just realized that "Nadir > dump Infernoid Evil > search Into the Void" is a thing
MATHMECH LET'S FUCKING GOOOOOOOO
Let me see how much this would cost in MD... GZUS CHRIST
The deck has been good/decent almost 2 years, if anything it was super worth it XD
@@oElementium cannons aren't out yet in md I'm pretty sure :(
@@k0ch1exactly. I've been playing it to get to master ever since the tear zero format even.
I appreciate you still making the profile when you don’t top as that’s even more instructive
Nice deck, but Lord in the main would be better in most game 1 cases and also allow you to reduce the Lady ratio in your deck from 3 to 2 (which would be better). You should also consider running draco-utopian aura in the main in place of compulsory because that is 2-3 more copies of solemn strike which makes your going second even better for dealing with Omni negates.
This isnt a combo deck, i would argue even running 50 cards makes no difference
Bro post a new lab deck on mb for this current meta t tribute ain’t it
Bro post a new lab deck on mb for this current meta t tribute ain’t it
Air Neos spotted. 🤔
Who?
Never existed
There are no air neos in ba sing se
Wdym there’s nothing there - Konami probably
There goes the Konami sponsorship 😆
Such a cool deck. Lord is such a slept on card. Agreed on compulse but yeah theres not a lot of other cards except for like Torrential Tribute which unfortunately isnt as good as it used to be as well
I wonder why tcg sets dont play furnitures anymore
I’m one of those duelists he said hi 😊
Guys who is that Hero-looking card next to Lord of Heavenly Prison?
What card? There’s a card there?
what do you mean? the board is empty except the deck and side deck???
@@Lich_V.My bad my eyes must have deceived me lol
Lovely in the opening hand is pretty common as a lab player. It's a cursed you have to live with :'D
Even when he's not playing Runicks, he plays Runicks!
I was waiting for this video. I am surprised by the decision not to bring arias, I feel that it can help in some plays.
What would arias really do though ?
@@knmrt2760lovely out of hand, use the traps as board breakers/interruptions….. but overall, without more names it probably isn’t that worth it
@@knmrt2760Interact with the opponent’s combo while going second
@@knmrt2760 Daruma / IDP / Terrors / Sim Equation Cannon when the opponent's setting up his board can be insane. He didn't go with Arias for the same reason he didn't play Arianna if I had to guess
@@sparesomerunesplease3683 I think it wouldn't do much in the gameplan he was going for... Set 5 going first and going second he purposely wants his opponent to play their full turn and spend their extra deck resources there would be no real reason to use Arias here to stop the opponent.
Thanks for the update man :) Which trap would you remove to use the new trap Dominus Impulse?
Seems like compulse would be the one to remove
Firstly, is it even worth playing? He's not even playing imperm. Impulse does nothing to help you break a board... and a common theme with his card choices is they are either blowouts (sphere mode, daruma, cannon) or they help you resolve the blowouts by forcing or stopping the negate.
Impulse does neither so I would be surprised if he played it at all.
Nice switch up Josh, congrats on the progress regardless of not getting top 32
“No card more than 5 bucks”
that purple thing in the top left corner: 🗿
Excellent option for budget players and vs meta. Thanks for all the ideas
Hey Josh idk if you considered it or not but did you try Lilith, Lady of Lamat for trap lab, it's basically Arianna but it dodges all the hand traps (it tributes it self on quick effect for cost to set any 3 of trap card) but conflicts for the normal.
you said it
It conflicts with the normal + its not worth it cause it’s basically duality
@@ayham613I dont agree its duality, most of your traps are 3ofs so lilith automatically resolves and it only conflicts with sphere mode so 2 lilith could be ok, but yeah it would require some testing
Josh do you think this deck will be able to perform also post ROTA ?
hear that a card can negate a "you cannot activate in response to this card," card is scary.
2:20 Hangon, ima open TCGplayer to factcheck this as you go through, I'll be back with an edit. (Also it is possible that a lot of these cards changed in value since you picked them up so it might not be your fault)
Edit: Price breakdown according to TCGplayer. Prices are in USD and may fluctuate depending on market ect so I'm posting kinda an "average" here. Also your friendly local card shop may or may not use the same kinda price breakdown for their cards, but if anything a loooot of these cards will likely be cheaper because you might find them in a bin of common cards.)
Main Deck: ~ 88.80 USD (ish, with some variance, a lot of these traps are staples, depending on where you get them they might be more or less and obvs if you're a baller you could double this price to pick up QCR Ladys who are 10x more expensive than the standard rarity)
Extra Deck: I'm not calculating this, you could play anything but the Runic Fusions are probably required and they're not that pricy seemingly. You could get 1 of each for approx $10.
Side Deck: ~166.5 (but 150 of that approx depending on the time that you look it up is the Mulcharmys.) Even with that, an 8-3 swiss deck for ~300ish (probably less tbh but you could put whatever you want in the extra deck), and for less than $150 or realistically lower since you may already have many of the common staples like Duality Solemn Lava Golem or D-Barrier. Like, *I* could build this deck and the only thing I would need to buy is the Labrynth Cards, the Sphere Modes and Heavenlys, and I think the evenly matcheds because I haven't played for a long time and I have zero.
Curious on the decision to not play Arias. Did you feel the difference between going 2nd, setting the traps, and passing back and going 2nd but using Arias to cannon or equation them during their turn to not be consequential? Maybe the Compulses can just be Ariases?
I think Arias is way too neggy. It's -2 for using one trap, which in this format many decks can push through even if used optimally just because of the crazy extension available. I feel like the idea here is "let them cook" and out advantage eventually, which arias doesn't really help with
Arias is also bad going 2nd into Yubel since they Phantom very early. And Arias is definitely getting negated by Phantom. And going 1st it does nothing in this deck.
@@shirohiruka it tecnically does something tho, but if you arent playing Arianna, it can be weird, because, you can get Arianna Acess, then Welcome into Lady for a draw, and thus speeding ur deck, also it enables virus setups, since you can't really "search" virus with Lady without some speed to get into Clock and the Welcomes.
If you use erradicator + cooclock you only need 2 labs to get erradicator out first turn
Why does gy effs and light dark for bystials matter if cannon banishes ur extra deck cards, not sends them in gy
Branded Regained activates when a Light or Dark monster gets banished, and decks that use Bystials always have that card.
what would you replace for the fuwalos?
man singing the song why trap decks should actualy be really strong in modern yugioh. if just we would get more good trap cards than something from literally 20 years ago. that you can do "full combo" going second and your opponent cannot interact with you doing so unless we start to print more cards like s:p really should make this stronger than it is
Conversely, there has not been a single card to power creep interacting with 5 set backrow cards in 25 years.
@@AlphaSquadZero well, there was Twin Twister discarding a Danger that pops a backrow, but that is still only a 2 for 3, not a 1 for 5 like HFD or Heavy Storm.
Do you want a Cosmic Cyclone style Harpie's Feather Duster? Cause that kind of wishing on La Jinn's lamp is gonna get you a "pay 1400 for each target, banish that many spell/traps on your opponent's field." card that puts you down to 1k LP turn 2.
The sheer fact that they can interact with it turn 3 will make setting trap absolute horrible since it already depends heavily on the meta. This meta simply choosed negation instead of poping/banishing interaction in the end board, in the Ryzeal/Malice meta or SE-FireKing matchup setting 5 can be punished very hard
@@wickederebus I am moreso thinking something like DRNM, forbidden droplet, lava golem, or sphere mode, but for spell and traps
@@k0ch1 Set 4 and activate lord of the heavenly prison, nice pops.
Josh my head hurts before I even played a game
Its cool to see this deck, ive been wanting to play it for a while and with the format constantly changing i had no clue what was good in it, also i saw that the left out the field spell is it a bad card to play or is it just optional?
Easy to see where you went wrong. You're supposed to play The Calc. That's short for The Calculator btw
Good job josh well done
Im curious what alternative you would use as replacement for the purylia 🤔 Im actually building this list now but I dont want to dump the money on them. Thanks for all the content! Ive been learning a lot about the game from you and Pak.
Why did you decide against the dogmatika punishment? It looked pretty crazy with garura and n'tess in that one MD worlds game. Or one or the other paleozoic, wouldnt they have fit to your deck?
He wanted as few Hand Trap targets as possible, and relying on a Punishment, which could get Ash Blossomed, was not part of that goal.
the entire Extra deck was dedicated to not being LIGHT or DARK to avoid feeding enemy Bystials. Aside from the obligatory Runic cards.
Everything else was to get a WATER, WIND, FIRE, or EARTH extra deck target.
@@wickederebus you cannot ash dogmatika punishment
today, I learned about labrynth runick
8:54 if i had 500 guesses what the priority search for trap trick was 0 of them would have been simultaneous equation cannon
Then you dont know anything about current yugioh. Sec is a Standard build for lab
Any thoughts on the deck post Rage of the Abyss?
He done his Math Class
Whats the fusion lvl 6 monster ?
ngl, if josh didn't already say he was on lab via his twitter, I'd of thought he ran circularless mathmech, from this title
“..mech”
Time for the superior build!
Labrynth Paleozoic
Whats a good mulcharmy replacement in the side
Is there a "good" replacement for the cannon? i lack too many extra deck monster to play the card, and i dont want to pay for those, eventhough they dont cost that much and the card is insane.
What could i sub it with?
Will there be a MD list for this deck?
How does Desirae get passed Dark Ruler? He mentioned that around 4:00
I assume it's
Chain Link 1: Your Dark Ruler No More
Chain Link 2: Their Spell or Trap (maybe Escape of the Unchained?)
Chain Link 3: Their Desirae, targeting your Dark Ruler No More
"Not expensive" - showing an Air Neos while saying that. Haha
You should play 2 dante for rank 3 and garura for level 6 for dogmatika maximus you can send them
What can you play instead of perulia?
I have been trying trap shaddoll. Now i want to try trap shaddoll with a lab engine
I can't afford labby, but you gave me inspiration to play eldlich. Thank you!
So you play Paleo, but at some Poi you remember that you were prepair for ycs and swap the Paleo engine with lab
Bro made a math lab
Is this deck good against tenpai? Masterduel is just flooded with tenpai right now and I dont know how to beat it.
19:13 Josh dropping the "frame 1" does he secretly play fighting games? If so i'd love to know which ones.
Vanquish Soul is his ideal Fighting Game. Also, Frame 1 is a pretty common term in any videogame, and has been popularized enough to be used outside of gaming.
Josh talked about the Extra Deck monsters not wanting to be light/darks, but how would they ever hit the gy as he's not playing i.e Ultimate Slayer. Same goes for the fact that he won't be able to resolve the gy eff of Fossil Warrior or is he specifically talking about his Opponent somehow extradeck looping him.
It's exactly that. Dogmatika wasn't technically a consideration, but if a 'free' slot can give you a 5% winrate against a 0.5% matchup, you take it instead of a card that goes 0% for 100% of matchups.
Do you have any particular reason that you didnt run the black goat laughs main deck
Does someone know what outer sleeves he is using ? Thx a lot
super Video wie immer ich hätte eine Frage und bitte wäre es möglich dir deine wcs sleeves die roten von 2024 abzukaufen eine Rückmeldung wäre sehr nett liebe Grüße und einen schönen Abend noch /falls nicht wo kann man sie kaufen lg
just replace the spheres with arias, and add DDG its a shifter without having a shifter.
Bro, just added Ra Sphere Mode to my Mekk-Knight SuperHeavy Samurai Deck, last Friday i tied to Yubel, because one of my Link-2 felt from the table and I didn't see it during the combo at duel 3, later beat a Runick White Forest, but lost from Runick White Forest Toy 😂 and Memento later, because I don't know the Deck enough and I didn't shuffled the Horse with Lib 😅
Is this playable in MD?
Replace 1 sphere mode with either ultimate slayer or a stall card like scapegoat. You could also just cut 1 and not replace it but my OCD doesn't like that.
Does anybody know the exact Sleeves that he uses? :)
🚨AIR NEOS🚨 Konami rigged the last game to prevent getting Air Neos‘d
Why no rollback ? Seems like it would be really good here ? I'm guessing cause there isn't a way to mill it.
The lighting on the camera kinda ass it's really hard to see the card names
The closest he will get to play MATHmech xD
Today I learn Lab Runicks
I want to play Laby how important is the extra deck?
You obv need the Runick fusions if you're going to play the Runick quick-play spells. Other than that you just need fusions and xyz with the right levels. You don't need to play the same ones as Josh.
This man put runicks in Lab he needs to be stopped
Mathemann Joshua Schmidt
Can someone explain to me why dies irae can negate drnm ?
Desirae can target a face up card at any point in a chain to negate it, while you can’t respond to DRNM with monster effect you can chain a different card like the Unchained traps in Yubel and then chain Desirae target DRNM to negate it.
@@mortis8188 ah hah !!! Amazing ..thank you !
I was wondering why our Lords were getting bought out on eBay, typical response to a Josh profile lmao
i love to see traps perform
Josh would have topped if he didn't play stun cards in Lab. 😂😂
Thoughts on dogma punishment package with ntss replacing the lv4 and beformet replacing lv6?
And what about backjack plus anima and typhon?
Can someone facilitate me the equation to do the math quick without knowing how to do maths
What do you think about WannaBee over Duality?
No Arias seems so wrong in a trap heavy build
MatLab is so cool
I think this is very interesting deck!
@ the tenpai player 😅
runick lab…….. hell yeah
No arias?
We know Josh loves math