I’m a prime shooter predominately . Using two cameras at the same time, I use the 35mm f/1.8 and the 85mm f/1.8 lenses. This is my perfect combo. I’ll also take a 105mm macro lens for ring shots and the 24-70mm f/2.8 for family and group photos.
I have the 15-35 f2.8 on my R7, 70-200 F2.8 on my R6II. How is that combo? no need to switch lenses. I am waiting for a RF prime USM 35/50mm f1.4 and that's it.
Hello bro i have just started as a wedding photographer i have sony a7 m3 and i have 24-70 f3.5 - 5.6 and now i am a bit confused which lens to buy 35mm/85mm or should i buy tamron 70-180 f2.8 bro can you please suggest??
Zoom all the way..nothing beats compression and versatility. Tried primes,now stuck in my bag but still definitely has special use cases like if light is limited or unsuppliable( Idk if thats a word.). My fave lens is also 70 -200 2.8.
Well, nothing beats compression and versatility, except primes, where the image is what matters, not the quality of life on the photographer while they are working. I will always outsell photographers who shoot with zooms only, they just cant get the subject isolation I can.
@@CryoftheProphet compression and versatility also make a good image quality..I had close friends in the filmmaking industry, if you see their kits/gears, you usually see zoom lenses. But of course it depends on your personal taste, and depends on what lenses you have. People always tend to justify what they bought. That's why I purchased both Zoom and prime. But if you prefer prime, then why not.
@@manolomiguelvalenzuela4877 I use primes because they have better resolution, and compression is a feature of focal length, no so much whether a lens can zoom or not. I would argue compression in telephoto primes is even more appealing than with zooms. Granted I shoot with two bodies, whereas some may not be able to do that.
Nice vid -- sust considering stills - simply put one needs a wider angle for environmental and groups shots and a portrait/headshot lens - so on a FF body that is a 24-35 and an 85 or longer - it depends on location sometimes a 14mm or even wider is needed. Whether these are ultra bright primes f/1.2 or high quality zoom f/2-f/2.8 or slower (f/4) depends on lighting and the budget. Lighting is as or more important than the lenses. For me 2 bodies with a wide and a closer mid tele is the place to start. keep 2 more in your bag (ultra wide and a more general purpose zoom). Strobes/reflectors not just speedlights and you need assistants. Video needs a different team and lighting.
I’m a prime shooter predominately . Using two cameras at the same time, I use the 35mm f/1.8 and the 85mm f/1.8 lenses. This is my perfect combo. I’ll also take a 105mm macro lens for ring shots and the 24-70mm f/2.8 for family and group photos.
💪🏾💪🏾
I have the 15-35 f2.8 on my R7, 70-200 F2.8 on my R6II. How is that combo? no need to switch lenses. I am waiting for a RF prime USM 35/50mm f1.4 and that's it.
Seems good.. with the crop on the R7 you have 24-50. Should serve you well.
Hello bro i have just started as a wedding photographer i have sony a7 m3 and i have 24-70 f3.5 - 5.6 and now i am a bit confused which lens to buy 35mm/85mm or should i buy tamron 70-180 f2.8 bro can you please suggest??
Since you have 24-70 I’d say get the 70-180 so you cover all your focal ranges.
@@AndreBrownPhoto sorry i have 28-70 f3.5 -5.6
great video.... i'm in Augusta and usually only use my 70-200 and the 24-70 for 99% of the wedding day...
❤️ a fellow zoom shooter.. Welcome! Be sure to join my Facebook group
Zoom all the way..nothing beats compression and versatility. Tried primes,now stuck in my bag but still definitely has special use cases like if light is limited or unsuppliable( Idk if thats a word.). My fave lens is also 70 -200 2.8.
Yea primes do have some benefits but they were definitely just clogging up my bag
Well, nothing beats compression and versatility, except primes, where the image is what matters, not the quality of life on the photographer while they are working. I will always outsell photographers who shoot with zooms only, they just cant get the subject isolation I can.
@@CryoftheProphet compression and versatility also make a good image quality..I had close friends in the filmmaking industry, if you see their kits/gears, you usually see zoom lenses. But of course it depends on your personal taste, and depends on what lenses you have. People always tend to justify what they bought. That's why I purchased both Zoom and prime. But if you prefer prime, then why not.
@@manolomiguelvalenzuela4877 I use primes because they have better resolution, and compression is a feature of focal length, no so much whether a lens can zoom or not.
I would argue compression in telephoto primes is even more appealing than with zooms.
Granted I shoot with two bodies, whereas some may not be able to do that.
@@CryoftheProphet i use 3 bodies and usually leave prime for only 1 cam . 2 bodies always zoom.. try the 70-200 f2.8. I always recommend that lens.
Nice vid -- sust considering stills - simply put one needs a wider angle for environmental and groups shots and a portrait/headshot lens - so on a FF body that is a 24-35 and an 85 or longer - it depends on location sometimes a 14mm or even wider is needed. Whether these are ultra bright primes f/1.2 or high quality zoom f/2-f/2.8 or slower (f/4) depends on lighting and the budget. Lighting is as or more important than the lenses. For me 2 bodies with a wide and a closer mid tele is the place to start. keep 2 more in your bag (ultra wide and a more general purpose zoom). Strobes/reflectors not just speedlights and you need assistants. Video needs a different team and lighting.
Yea I do videography as well and we use Nanlite. I have some videos coming up about it
My team is 35 sigma , rf 50 1.2 anda rf 100mm macro 2.8
I’ve never used any of the Sigma lenses
The best and unique is Tamron 35-150
That’s a descent range for a single lens