@@cycloboyriley oh really? That just seems…weird. Why? It doesn't look like the simulated course is very hilly, where W/kg is important. On a flat course just straight power is what matters.
@@JimCullen watts per kilo is a more detailed individual power indicator then just simply watts. Person A could be doing 300 watts and person B could be doing 300 watts but if they weigh different it just shows how much more effort it's taking one guy to do the watts vs the other. Is applicable in all cycling situations not just uphill
What are the lightning bolts next to the riders’ names during the bike leg?
Lightening bolt mean Power
@@cycloboyriley but it clearly isn't. Power should be in the hundreds, not single digits.
@@JimCullen yep watts per kg, the amount of power they are putting in divided by their weight.
@@cycloboyriley oh really? That just seems…weird. Why? It doesn't look like the simulated course is very hilly, where W/kg is important. On a flat course just straight power is what matters.
@@JimCullen watts per kilo is a more detailed individual power indicator then just simply watts. Person A could be doing 300 watts and person B could be doing 300 watts but if they weigh different it just shows how much more effort it's taking one guy to do the watts vs the other. Is applicable in all cycling situations not just uphill
Why there is "speed" for run and not "pace"? :-/ What a shame... Pace would be much better.