I’m in awe of Richard Mcan..I’m so glad he has done well for himself in life..I’ve heard some of his speeches, I admire his strength and compassion for others..Sending love from Leeds ❤
After the first "innocent" victim was murdered I recall a backlash against the media. The difference in the coverage was dramatic. The media definitely cared far less about the deaths of the prostitutes than the "nice girl" and people got angry. Times have changed. The media coverage of the victims of the Suffolk Strangler, who were all prostitutes, was far more humane. They were seen as sisters and daughters first and there was sympathy for their desperate lives.
I've seen were Barbara leach was killed in Bradford opposite uni,back of ash Grove, this was just on edge ov centre ov Bradford, he was already been hunted by every police force in UK, how he drove up there seen her then killed her without being stopped in his car by undercover cop cars,maybe they were all patrolling lumb lane and manningham at the time, but he got away with so much,the police were very slow
Sutcliffe was about to be released on the charge of theft of number plates,if it weren’t for Chief Inspector Clark who wasn’t happy with Sutcliffe and wanted him questioned further he’d have been released,gone back to Melbourne Avenue retrieved his knife and hammer and history would’ve been different,Sgt Ring and PC Hydes were just as inept as Oldfield and Holland,letting Sutcliffe not once but twice to dispose of his weapons is unforgivable,those 2 shouldn’t have got the credit but Clark should be the one who is lauded.
This case was not a Women's Rights Issue. Julie Bindel and the other Feminists should have kept their noses out of it. Despite making dreadful mistakes in their enquires, The police were doing everything they thought they could do.
Police did a very decent job. He has no conscience at all, which is very helpful to him. If a criminal can get rid of any guilty conscience and keep to himself, he is hard to catch.
This case highlighted the absolutely appalling attitudes towards women in 1970s England - many of those attitudes held by a number of women themselves. Those attitudes hampered this case and were probably indirectly responsible for the avoidable deaths of several women. What we saw was a very old fashioned, quasi victorian view of society, women's role in particular, and a real old fashioned shame culture. Thank god that's gone.
@@fang3839 I'm taking it you didn't listen to the end of this? I don't think any reasonable person could argue that the police handling of this case was in any way satisfactory. This case has become a byword for massive police incompetence, and was absolutely condemned by the special enquiry that was set up to investigate the police action. It led to sweeping changes to the way the police worked. Amongst other catastrophic mistakes, the FBI and many within the police warned those investigating this case that the tape sent in by that man claiming to be the ripper was a fraud.
I was listenimg to this and readining the comments until seeing julie bindle mentioned. I then switched to another u tube site before the feminist drivel from bindle !!!!!
I'm no fan of Julie Bindle. But I don't think anyone can dispute that this case highlighted the absolutely appalling social attitudes that were prevalent in England toward women in the 1970s. They significantly hampered this investigation and are probably a major factor in the deaths of many of these women. Thank god we've advanced since then.
@@th8257 Julie Bindle now states Sutcliffe stalked and followed her after she had an argument with her girlfriend 🤯 why didn’t these feminists like Bindle ever march or protest after a prostitute was murdered or attacked..
When I worked with forensic psychiatrists some years after the trial, I was told the authorities felt the public wouldn't accept anything less than a full trial, but that Peter Sutcliffe was totally delusional and not fit to be tried. He covered his tracks when interviewed because he was completely certain that he was doing God's work. He thought God was talking to him even during the trial. Soon after the trial he was moved to Broadmoor, which was exactly where he needed to be. I hope he never recovers - imagine coming to your senses and realising the horror of what you had done.
Well thank goodness he's dead now, should have been given the death penalty right away. Peter Sutcliffe delusional? I think not. He was perfectly sane and aware of every single act of horrific violence and murder he committed, and what's more, he enjoyed mutilating and murdering. I hope since the time you wrote your comment you have realized how ridiculous this claim of insanity was, and what he needed was not to be at Broadmoor, he needed to be executed for brutally murdering so many people.
Dear Olive, l am so sorry. Rest in Peace dear Lady🌹
My Ma had me scared to bits that he could jump out and get her, even though we were in Ireland.
Well, someone like him could....
I’m in awe of Richard Mcan..I’m so glad he has done well for himself in life..I’ve heard some of his speeches, I admire his strength and compassion for others..Sending love from Leeds ❤
After the first "innocent" victim was murdered I recall a backlash against the media. The difference in the coverage was dramatic. The media definitely cared far less about the deaths of the prostitutes than the "nice girl" and people got angry. Times have changed. The media coverage of the victims of the Suffolk Strangler, who were all prostitutes, was far more humane. They were seen as sisters and daughters first and there was sympathy for their desperate lives.
Well said.
Excellent interview!
23:33 Bless! Thems my people… doing us proud with the - funny coz true - West Yorks humour 😂🎉❤
Jean Jordan never married Alan Royle or took his name
David Zakrisson is a top top guy
I've seen were Barbara leach was killed in Bradford opposite uni,back of ash Grove, this was just on edge ov centre ov Bradford, he was already been hunted by every police force in UK, how he drove up there seen her then killed her without being stopped in his car by undercover cop cars,maybe they were all patrolling lumb lane and manningham at the time, but he got away with so much,the police were very slow
These women we all “innocent” and times haven’t changed all that much.
Huddersfield is still a miserable dump too.🎉
Why is Joan Harrison down here as a Ripper victim? She was killed by Christopher Smith.
AAron Thom it was done before August 1980 as Marguerite Walls or Jaqueline Hill aren’t on it.
Darren Field I see, that makes sense
If Sutcliffe hadn't confessed, maybe on the second interview at the station, he could of easy walked away.
The discovery of the knife and hammer sealed his fate.
@@GriefTourist I agree,
Sutcliffe was about to be released on the charge of theft of number plates,if it weren’t for Chief Inspector Clark who wasn’t happy with Sutcliffe and wanted him questioned further he’d have been released,gone back to Melbourne Avenue retrieved his knife and hammer and history would’ve been different,Sgt Ring and PC Hydes were just as inept as Oldfield and Holland,letting Sutcliffe not once but twice to dispose of his weapons is unforgivable,those 2 shouldn’t have got the credit but Clark should be the one who is lauded.
@@GriefTourist sorry for my pack of case knowledge, but how were those found?
@@penelope-oe2vr GOOGLE LAZY
This case was not a Women's Rights Issue. Julie Bindel and the other Feminists should have kept their noses out of it. Despite making dreadful mistakes in their enquires, The police were doing everything they thought they could do.
However the argument that men rather than women should be under what amounted to a curfew is hard to counter.
Sophie Jameson
Absolutely not.
Men were not the enemy.
A particular man was.
Police did a very decent job. He has no conscience at all, which is very helpful to him. If a criminal can get rid of any guilty conscience and keep to himself, he is hard to catch.
This case highlighted the absolutely appalling attitudes towards women in 1970s England - many of those attitudes held by a number of women themselves. Those attitudes hampered this case and were probably indirectly responsible for the avoidable deaths of several women. What we saw was a very old fashioned, quasi victorian view of society, women's role in particular, and a real old fashioned shame culture. Thank god that's gone.
@@fang3839 I'm taking it you didn't listen to the end of this? I don't think any reasonable person could argue that the police handling of this case was in any way satisfactory. This case has become a byword for massive police incompetence, and was absolutely condemned by the special enquiry that was set up to investigate the police action. It led to sweeping changes to the way the police worked. Amongst other catastrophic mistakes, the FBI and many within the police warned those investigating this case that the tape sent in by that man claiming to be the ripper was a fraud.
I was listenimg to this and readining the comments until seeing julie bindle mentioned. I then switched to another u tube site before the feminist drivel from bindle !!!!!
I'm no fan of Julie Bindle. But I don't think anyone can dispute that this case highlighted the absolutely appalling social attitudes that were prevalent in England toward women in the 1970s. They significantly hampered this investigation and are probably a major factor in the deaths of many of these women. Thank god we've advanced since then.
Me too
@@th8257 Julie Bindle now states Sutcliffe stalked and followed her after she had an argument with her girlfriend 🤯 why didn’t these feminists like Bindle ever march or protest after a prostitute was murdered or attacked..
When I worked with forensic psychiatrists some years after the trial, I was told the authorities felt the public wouldn't accept anything less than a full trial, but that Peter Sutcliffe was totally delusional and not fit to be tried. He covered his tracks when interviewed because he was completely certain that he was doing God's work. He thought God was talking to him even during the trial. Soon after the trial he was moved to Broadmoor, which was exactly where he needed to be. I hope he never recovers - imagine coming to your senses and realising the horror of what you had done.
David Martin even his brother said he’s bad not mad..
Well thank goodness he's dead now, should have been given the death penalty right away. Peter Sutcliffe delusional? I think not. He was perfectly sane and aware of every single act of horrific violence and murder he committed, and what's more, he enjoyed mutilating and murdering. I hope since the time you wrote your comment you have realized how ridiculous this claim of insanity was, and what he needed was not to be at Broadmoor, he needed to be executed for brutally murdering so many people.