If Red Dead Redemption 2 gets a 10/10, then how the hell does this 6 hour campaign with broken AI and repetitive run and gun segments get a 7.3? I'm sorry, but as far as single player campaigns go, this is a joke in comparison.
Vexx Lavon This IS a WW2 campaign. It’s all historically accurate. African men made up the bulk of the French army late in the war. Women fought in and led resistance cells in Norway. The special boat service was a thing. Stop complaining just because it doesn’t fit your narrow-minded view of the Second World War.
@RRench lmao this is strictly single player not multiplayer, and yea i found the campaign to be incredibly shallow, pointless and even shorter than bf1.
@@endangeredmexican9644 They are not the same type of game. Did you ever had (insert fruit name here)? This ( insert vegetable name here ) is asschecks compare to it. What?!
Facts Campaigns > than Multiplayer.... Even with the most famous multiplayer games in the world ( example Black Ops ll's & Black Ops 1's Campaign both > than their multiplayer & Zombies mode combined ) Gamers still want long Intense Campaigns ( we could give a crap about multiple) It's the developers that have become blindsided to what their consumer demands
Battlefield was never a singleplayer campaign sort of game. They didn't even have campaigns before Bad Company, just offline multiplayer in instant action with bots. Modern battlefields have obligatory campaigns, but everyone knows it's a multiplayer game, with the campaign as an added bonus side mode, not the main deal. Call of Duty on the other hand always do a very thorough, excellent job with their campaigns, even if they're short and shallow.
While I'm sure making two reviews for the same popular game benefits IGN, how is that bad for us? Now we get two arbitrary numbers to analyze a game instead of one. I just don't get why everyone is making such a big fuss over their two videos format. IGN is a company that needs to make money...
@@theoutsidermark7992 You can complain about woman in the multiplayer... But the Norwegian resistance together with the flemish and the french resistance where full with women... You need to visit our country's a little and come and do your research. In Belgium almost 40 percent of the resistance was female. In norway and france it was little less but not by allot.
@@sujimayne It's sad when people don't know about the millions of Japanese ninja disabeled skiers who fought in the front lines for the Allied powers. As EA says, they are "uneducated."
0:45 Yeah, THAT'S what the SP should be. An enormous war, where you participate in the huge battles, pushing the front forward. Instead of stealth silliness.
Wrath of Vaughn Not really. It just fragments it needlessly, resulting in a pretty awful review, or I guess ‘reviews’, so IGN can make a bit more money from it. I’m still waiting on the options menu review.
@@basedplants we don't review multiplayer tutorial, but this is what ign is doing in this video. The singleplayer contents in BF are not qualified to get a review seperately. Plus the way they are doing this means that we have to wait much longer for a full review of a game.
To all those who are going to play this: I'd say campaign feels kind of same and there is a lot of switching players compared to BF1. But yeah, it is an overhaul when things like graphics, music, sound design are concerned. Yes, the game play is very similar to BF1. The War stories are amazing especially the Norway one but the game has very short campaign. It took me nearly 4 hours to complete all the War stories. The art direction is superb. Talking about inaccuracies, that didn't bothered me. The BR mode is decent though. You kind of get that adrenaline rush like in Blackout. Overall feels kind of expansion or re-skin of BF1 but i can agree since it has a year of development gap and aesthetically WW1 and WW2 are similar. Not saying the game wasn't fun. I had some great moments during the beta. It felt like i was playing on a unreleased map from BF1. Buy it or not, it's just a personal choice.
Disrespecting the Norwegian heroes who died and got executed after the Vemork-raid. Disgraceful to see this being done to our national heritage - especially since the last participant of the original Vemork-raid died 3 weeks ago. Hvil i fred Joachim Rønneberg.
So, in your small simple minded, "NO WAMEN" brain you think that since one campaign mission is bad and unrealistic then it completely ruins the multiplayer? Which is literally all that matters in a Battlefield game.
Haven't played RDR2 yet - RDR1 was so boring I just couldn't be bothered to finish it. For me, GOTY has to be GOW. Hope LOU2 comes out before too long - don't want to miss it due to inevitable old age and death.
My idea for a battlefield storyline set in WW2. You play as a prisoner who was drafted in the first group of people picked for the bad company squadron. From there it'll play as an inglorious bastards style story where you are a group of rag tag prisoners who's mission is to be dropped behind enemy lines and kill as much as possible.
I don’t understand the hate for them splitting the videos up lol. It makes perfect sense. People who only want single player get a more in depth review, and people who only care about multiplayer get a more in depth review.
Thing thing is, Battlefield hasn't ever really specialised in single player campaigns and it shows here. Hardline was probably the most interesting because it didn't just feel like another war scenario. WW2 has been done to death. There isn't anything left to do with that setting. It limits your creative licence so much. Call of Duty excels at singleplayer campaigns because it can literally be anything, they can go batshit crazy with their narrative and that is what makes it entertaining. You can only watch Saving Private Ryan so many times before you'd prefer to see something like Sabotage or The Kingdom.
Hardline's campaign was fun af at least, DICE just can't see what they do best: LARGE SCALE WARS, and EA keeps making them rush their games, this way they will never do something great....
No it hasn't lmao. When have you ever seen a WW2 game set on the Chinese front? In Burma? The Soviet attack on Japan? The 3 sided front in Finland? It's only been "done to death" on the fronts America was involved in.
@@neosmith3633 most right wingers don't care about equal representation. They care about how forced the placing of feminism in a WWII setting. They feel like feminism is being forced down their throat.
@@peterjohnson805 what lol i own every mainline BF game and BF5 is going to be the first mainline BF that i will not buy well not at launch maybe a year or so from now when it's worth the 14$ on origins
MACK PAYNE and the game only got like 5 sales ..... unlike cod it also doesn’t have a battle royale mode at launch.... unlike cod it doesn’t have a zombies mode ........unlike cod
Nice one IGN for finally realizing that a 5 minute video isn't enough for games that have massively different and in-depth modes like COD with Zombies, Blackout and Classic Multiplayer.
So many people in this comment section that still remember everybody who participate in WW2. And they all know exactly what each of them did. Kinda amazing how old the average gamer are.
@Mark Dion I'd literally bet legit money that the majority of them didn't, never have, and haven't legitimately learned anything about ww2 since they were in school (if most of them aren't still in school already)
I wonder if sales would be better if you could choose to just buy single player or multiplayer (or both). I’m not interested in the multiplayer but I’d buy single player.
I too have zero interest in the any FPS multiplayer game. But I like to play through the story. I would love if they split it and sold them separately.
I guess there were 2000+ educated viewers who liked this half assed review... Battlefield started as a PC game.. And now its went back to be a "PC" game
I appreciate that you guys take the time to give an in-depth review, but splitting them up pisses me off. Also, your app won’t play videos properly, and that makes me look elsewhere even though I don’t want to
@@mvick4198 lol I highly doubt that if you were given $60 and forced to either give it to EA, or eat mouthfuls of sand for 40 hours to keep it, that you'd eat the sand.
That part with you having you to warm yourself from freezing is not new that was in Bad company 2 when you are running down the mountain after calling the satellite down.
“More than 800,000 women served in the Soviet Armed Forces during the war, which is roughly 3% of total military personnel, mostly as medics. About 300,000 served in anti-aircraft units and preformed all functions in the batteries- including firing the guns!” WOMEN DID SERVE IN THE WW2
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
7.3/10 "Too much field, not enough battle."
Ci Fur lol
True
😂😂
@@lfdhrgasdf7579 looking back this is by far the best game they came out with
Stop with this nonsense. Put the whole thing in one video.
Wouldn't want the review for multiplayer to be brought down because of this though...
The Battle Royale hits in March though so...
I find it useful since I only buy games for single player. I couldn't care less about multiplayer.
Does it really matter?
@Mortimer Moore Dude,what the hell?
So now is like this? can't wait for the “options menu review”
And the pause menu review?🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Both are on the way
-IGN
I can't wait for the loading up review
Pretty much yes ever since the Black Ops 4 review was cut up into pieces
Am I the only one excited for the multiplayer results menu review?
I wish they made a 30-40 hours battlefield single player game
what the hell
@@babakamin5530 ?
It's ea
battlefield has become cod. wadya expect?
@@adityasinghjadoun104 no they just have never made any campaign that long it doesn’t mean they are turning into cod
A woman killing Germans with throwing knives while on skis, must have missed that part of ww2 in history class🤔
Why are you trying to learn history from a video game?
Yeah. Like all other WWI and II games are so darn realistic.
@@jesusblanco7657 because the developers are telling me that at least the campaign will represent some kind of historical accuracy, but it didn't.
It’s a damn video game
@@simonklaassen2145 so what? They call it WW2 for a reason pal. If it wasnt then i wouldnt care if it had dinosaurs.
7.3/10 -too much world war 2, not enough feminism
Jokar get rekt
Thank Goodness. It doesn't need more feminism.
@@acejokar2084 progre
He legitimately said that there isn’t enough real WW2 scenarios...
You embarrass me.
My brain can't handle all this historical accuracy.
That's because you are uneducated
Y'all never went this nuclear when CoD WW2 did this.
Sounds about right. What does a dead fish know?
@@ThisIsCSDX cuz eA bAd is the only thing that runs through the mind of capital G gamers
@@fancypants5782 What's your favorite Fortnite dance?
Please do a separate review for each smash character. Thanks
If they do it for each new smash character that would be like.. 3 reviews or something like that.
Jay Ray boy what we 70 characters and counting
@@christiaandecosta 70 new characters? Sorry but I don't count reskins as new chars
Lmfao
Jay Ray he said for each smash character not new. So that'll be like 40 and he was being sarcastic 🙄
I love single player campaign not a fan of multiplayer when playing FPS. Keep single player alive developers.
Ikr no more Black Ops 4s 🤬
@@9latinumStudiozye that was a £70 waste
Wow, Wolfenstein 3 is looking weird.
He has 259 likes u only have 2 so it must of been funny.
Wolfenstein 3 The new Clawlossus
@@jacobross735 i think his likes to your likes does the talking, you should go back to sarcasm school, and math.
LMAO riiiight?
Rare images of Wolfenstein young blood
If Red Dead Redemption 2 gets a 10/10, then how the hell does this 6 hour campaign with broken AI and repetitive run and gun segments get a 7.3? I'm sorry, but as far as single player campaigns go, this is a joke in comparison.
Flibble Wally he definitely said way too many negatives for It to be a 7.3
I know right
Yea. If this was a true standalone game for $60 there's no way it would be a 7.3. I don't even think it deserves a 5.
6 hours? It’s 3 hours at best
The difference between a 7.3 and a 10 is a lot for ign standards
“ Battlefailed V is so real. ” They said.
Who said that ? Battlefeild stoped being real way before bad company adn the realest thing it does have is the immersion of big battles
Edward Urbano 🤦♂️
Dammit, make a World War 2 campaign not a soap opera.
someone will have the brains and realise there is a huge market for a brilliantly done world war 2 campaign.. that is exspansive and true too history
wha... what?
iwannaMcDie play World at War or the majority of old-school Call of duties/Medal of Honors. You will know what I mean.
Vexx Lavon This IS a WW2 campaign. It’s all historically accurate. African men made up the bulk of the French army late in the war. Women fought in and led resistance cells in Norway. The special boat service was a thing. Stop complaining just because it doesn’t fit your narrow-minded view of the Second World War.
S3 Solid Snake Simulation Not an EA shill, just someone who has studied military history. I might advise you to do the same.
What about the LGBTQ community during the war
Yeah right. What about Transgender battalion?
Wat about the robots
What about the ZUCCs?
What about the droid attacks on the Wookies?
Did you just assume their gender?
7.3? You mean 3.7 right?
@RRench lmao this is strictly single player not multiplayer, and yea i found the campaign to be incredibly shallow, pointless and even shorter than bf1.
@@endangeredmexican9644 They are not the same type of game. Did you ever had (insert fruit name here)? This ( insert vegetable name here ) is asschecks compare to it. What?!
It's campaign is worse than black ops 4 campaign no variety in missions
@@Andysumno Did you play?
@@franciscoramos8823 yep beat the whole thing in a little over 3hrs.
Wish games would start making long campaigns again
That’s not up to developers that’s up to gamers. Whatever sells
But they do
Facts Campaigns > than Multiplayer.... Even with the most famous multiplayer games in the world ( example Black Ops ll's & Black Ops 1's Campaign both > than their multiplayer & Zombies mode combined )
Gamers still want long Intense Campaigns ( we could give a crap about multiple)
It's the developers that have become blindsided to what their consumer demands
@@j-rcctrigga9731 zombies and campaign over multiplayer but certainly not campaign over zombies
Battlefield was never a singleplayer campaign sort of game. They didn't even have campaigns before Bad Company, just offline multiplayer in instant action with bots. Modern battlefields have obligatory campaigns, but everyone knows it's a multiplayer game, with the campaign as an added bonus side mode, not the main deal. Call of Duty on the other hand always do a very thorough, excellent job with their campaigns, even if they're short and shallow.
Sadly, I'm not educated enough to play this, so I will go back to Red Dead 2, Forza Horizons 4, Spiderman, and any other game instead of this.
Narata lmao
Where is Gav? Gavin!
Hey mister, You still ain't found him yet?
I ignored that guy the whole game, beat it then found him in blackwater still shouting for that him
GAVIN!!!!
I think the guy shouting for him is actually crazy and might be hallucinating or something.
If u kill him i hear u pick up some note or something like that
So a 6 hour single player where you walk/ski alone and kill single guards is a 7,3 IGN?
As if.. That score is only due to who the publisher is.
zuldo The single player is 3 hours only
Cod 4 Modern warfare was a 4 hour campaign and much of it was stealth too.
@@vitorfernandes651 cod 4 is 10 years old
I just want a war game to feel like war during the campaign
EA can shove this game up where the sun don’t shine.
Yeah..Finland
Don N yeah only the most fitting to tackle “mature video games”
Who hurt you?
Don N lmao battlefield v is fortnite but with better graphics.
Sadly fortnite is better than this trash
how to be greedy filthy ign split a game review into 2 pieces
See this guy gets it
Actually three.
When firestorm comes out, that will be a third review XD
While I'm sure making two reviews for the same popular game benefits IGN, how is that bad for us? Now we get two arbitrary numbers to analyze a game instead of one. I just don't get why everyone is making such a big fuss over their two videos format. IGN is a company that needs to make money...
@@SkullzNHERO probably that. The "for the clicks" thing. Did black ops 4 really need 4 videos?
@@Shadow4192008 RDR2 single player experience is an 7-8/10 at best anyway. Clunky controls, very slow and 99% of the game is riding your horse.
I am just here to witness the dislikes.
I am not disappointed
What sad life you have
(multiplayer sold separately)
@@chur_monty4357 I guess, it takes one to know one.
Incels, alt-right and failures.
A female skier that's a ninja?! WTF in WW2 hahaha!!! 😂😂😂
Look up Norwegian Resistance dumbass hahaha!!! 😂😂😂
Too much idoit sauce bud.
@@bplusstudios9031 in Norwegian resistance there was no women lol
@@theoutsidermark7992 Anne Margrethe Strømsheim would like a word with you, my dude.
@@theoutsidermark7992 You can complain about woman in the multiplayer... But the Norwegian resistance together with the flemish and the french resistance where full with women... You need to visit our country's a little and come and do your research. In Belgium almost 40 percent of the resistance was female. In norway and france it was little less but not by allot.
Really enjoying the separate and more in-depth reviews of each component of the game. Please keep doing it for big games like this :)
damn only a 7.3, can you imagine if it didn't have the female agenda bonus points?
Hey! She is disabled as well! Show some respect and accept the female disabled ninja skier bonus points! Grrrrrrrr.
@@narata1541 Ironically, you need a history lesson.
@@sujimayne It's sad when people don't know about the millions of Japanese ninja disabeled skiers who fought in the front lines for the Allied powers. As EA says, they are "uneducated."
Would have scored 5.8 if it only featured straight white males.
This has to be the worst campaign battlefield has ever done....meant to be ww2 looks like comand and conquer....ffs
Gavin M no, its actually just as bad as bf4 and bf1 which means its a bad 60$ joke
@@ChrisBa303 see i actually liked bf1s campaign...had a lot of action and atmosphere and at leat looked like some effort was put into it
Hey now, don't drag command and conquer into this. EA already murdered it with a mobile game.
I never played the campaign in BF1, only the multiplayer.
Have you played bf v war stories?
Forgot bout dis game
the Greatest don’t worry, everyone did
@@lconner1959 not everyone
Well severs are full at early access.
derivedwhale45 one day you’ll understand how jokes work, one day...
It’s funny how I managed to remember Hitman 2 but not Battlefield V.
I am uneducated, so i can not buy or play this game. Sad day indeed.
Don't kid yourself, no one's gonna miss ya :)
Original Comment
Maybe when you’re a little older. Chin up.
You don't need to be educated, only Indoctrinated.
It is a sad day when you realize how many incels there are in the world.
the last card for EA is bad company 3
Majd studio EA is ruining all of its ips
1:50 'remember when dice said battlefield V will be the most immersive war experience yet? Lmao
0:45 Yeah, THAT'S what the SP should be. An enormous war, where you participate in the huge battles, pushing the front forward. Instead of stealth silliness.
I already miss BF3 story. Go watch the launch trailer for that game then cry at how bad these new games are
That still was an average story. Campaign was just never Battlefield's strength.
Every time i see new content about BFV i wonder i should've played BF3 more than i did. It was a great game.
BF3 had such a mediocre and cliche campaign cmon now
Evrim Enüstün I wish they focused more on multiplayer rather than on single player, single player isn’t what I primarily buy these games for
Don't forget btf1.
Wow, *Far cry : WW2 with girls on its ski throwing knife* dlc looks meh
Apparently that was a real thing in Norway
@@wprempin weeeehhhhh who says?
@@rok0sbasili5k someone in the comment section said hes from Norway and they really had an elite squad like that
@@wprempin no, thatbis a lie.
The Partisans of Norway didn't fight often and when they fought, they had usually more casualties than the Germans.
@@wprempin I wouldn't refer to clowns who ski down a mountain and throw knives as "elite".
don't do it seperately, plz. It is non-sense.
But it gives you "a better idea of what's up" lmao
Wrath of Vaughn Not really. It just fragments it needlessly, resulting in a pretty awful review, or I guess ‘reviews’, so IGN can make a bit more money from it. I’m still waiting on the options menu review.
@@basedplants we don't review multiplayer tutorial, but this is what ign is doing in this video. The singleplayer contents in BF are not qualified to get a review seperately. Plus the way they are doing this means that we have to wait much longer for a full review of a game.
ATTENTION ALL GAMERS
*THIS IS NOT A WW2 GAME*
Timothy Drake uh, yes it is
your right, this is an allegory for feminism. STOP TALKING ABOUT THE WAMENS. WE NEED TO PROTECT THEM.
@RE fan no they were not.
@@KKris-h No it isn't. This is a marxistic political 60$ agenda of the EA.
@@demonpride1975 yes there are
so the campaign is only around 3x 2-hour? 6 hours?
Asians love math
there's a "coming soon" stay tunning!
I came for the comments. :P
Peter Fox same lol 😁
Same, there are a lot of triggered people hating on the game cause there’s women in it, it’s hilarious
me too lol, I didn't even watch the video
I know they said it's a different take on World War 2, but damn it doesn't even look like World War 2 at all.
WW2 was just an excuse to sell this, their plan was to shove their polictical agenda down our throats all the way.
It feels like ww2. I'm the dillweed will early access, and most of the stuff is pretty realistic. Hardly notice the female soldiers.
Solid snake would be ashamed of you
I hear words but can't take anything in. What's happening!?
How does this 2 year old comment have only 5 likes and can still be the 1st rated comment by RUclips?
@@tomatopotato1136 wondering the same
Hahaha IKR
vicente and Brendan above me are bots
dementia
To all those who are going to play this: I'd say campaign feels kind of same and there is a lot of switching players compared to BF1. But yeah, it is an overhaul when things like graphics, music, sound design are concerned. Yes, the game play is very similar to BF1. The War stories are amazing especially the Norway one but the game has very short campaign. It took me nearly 4 hours to complete all the War stories. The art direction is superb. Talking about inaccuracies, that didn't bothered me. The BR mode is decent though. You kind of get that adrenaline rush like in Blackout. Overall feels kind of expansion or re-skin of BF1 but i can agree since it has a year of development gap and aesthetically WW1 and WW2 are similar. Not saying the game wasn't fun. I had some great moments during the beta. It felt like i was playing on a unreleased map from BF1. Buy it or not, it's just a personal choice.
This was a great idea to split up the single player and multiplayer parts into two separate reviews!!! I love it, thank you!
Can I type "white man" in the chat?
Yes...if you fancy permaban and real life harassment ;)
carny15 did you try it.
Only if you wanna go to liberal gulag
Hell you can’t type wuhgy boogie
@@Piggy991 I wonder if that's actually a name?. 😂😂😂
0.3 original rating + 7 [ Lady on ski's kills soldiers with throwing knives] = 7.3 Excellent !
2:53 "only campaign that makes me FEEL LIKE I'm an important part of an army"
keep the meme alive IGN
Disrespecting the Norwegian heroes who died and got executed after the Vemork-raid. Disgraceful to see this being done to our national heritage - especially since the last participant of the original Vemork-raid died 3 weeks ago. Hvil i fred Joachim Rønneberg.
Thank you for appreciating the sacrifice people make and appreciating history itself.
Lady on ski's kills soldiers with throwing knives....
LMAO wtf I'm not buying this trash! What's next parkour soldiers in Vietnam. Haha
SSSShh, don't say that too loud. I'm sure we have DICE spies in the comment section.
Lucas Féres you and your dice spies.
So, in your small simple minded, "NO WAMEN" brain you think that since one campaign mission is bad and unrealistic then it completely ruins the multiplayer? Which is literally all that matters in a Battlefield game.
She's a resistance fighter
don't you know, you always bring a knife to a gun fight.
Like if Red Dead Redemption 2 is GOTY👌👌👌😍
GOTC
Yes
Haven't played RDR2 yet - RDR1 was so boring I just couldn't be bothered to finish it. For me, GOTY has to be GOW. Hope LOU2 comes out before too long - don't want to miss it due to inevitable old age and death.
It's not.
Wrong game review
This whole review is kinda:
“Buy RDR2 instead”
Yeah but that goes w any game tbh
My idea for a battlefield storyline set in WW2. You play as a prisoner who was drafted in the first group of people picked for the bad company squadron. From there it'll play as an inglorious bastards style story where you are a group of rag tag prisoners who's mission is to be dropped behind enemy lines and kill as much as possible.
I forgot this game existed
mnb323 same lol
This is probably one of the worse first person single player game I’ve played in my life.
I don’t understand the hate for them splitting the videos up lol. It makes perfect sense. People who only want single player get a more in depth review, and people who only care about multiplayer get a more in depth review.
Thing thing is, Battlefield hasn't ever really specialised in single player campaigns and it shows here.
Hardline was probably the most interesting because it didn't just feel like another war scenario.
WW2 has been done to death. There isn't anything left to do with that setting. It limits your creative licence so much.
Call of Duty excels at singleplayer campaigns because it can literally be anything, they can go batshit crazy with their narrative and that is what makes it entertaining. You can only watch Saving Private Ryan so many times before you'd prefer to see something like Sabotage or The Kingdom.
Hardline's campaign was fun af at least, DICE just can't see what they do best: LARGE SCALE WARS, and EA keeps making them rush their games, this way they will never do something great....
Call of Duty excels at singleplayer campaigns?... I mean MW1 aside. What? Since when?
Akhilendra Gunasekara BO1 campaign is way better than MW
No it hasn't lmao. When have you ever seen a WW2 game set on the Chinese front? In Burma? The Soviet attack on Japan? The 3 sided front in Finland? It's only been "done to death" on the fronts America was involved in.
@@Eltener123 nobody wants to be on the loser side
I wanted a realistic story not running around alone like a headless chicken shooting and health automatically regenerating
Waiting for a comment that doesnt involve gender and politics and involves the actual gameplay/story. Yall people are so offended by everything.
zaikris plus why click here even?
Seriously. I cant wait to buy this game. Haters can go play BO4 with prepubescent 360 no scopers
Actually, nearly all dont involve gender OR politics, just annoyance at IGN splitting the review into 2 parts
The irony in right wingers being triggered by equal representation is mind blowing.
@@neosmith3633 most right wingers don't care about equal representation. They care about how forced the placing of feminism in a WWII setting. They feel like feminism is being forced down their throat.
What happened to the girl with prosthetic arm from the trailers? She was cut out of game?
this is how ww2 played out in the Rick & Morty C-137 Dimension
Imagine if they just did a D-Day campaign.
PS+ people in the house May 2021
battlefield 1.5
Not even close lol. Do some research.
Battlefield -4.5
well at least BF1 was authentic to it's era
Sounds like someone wishes they had the game lol
@@peterjohnson805 what lol i own every mainline BF game and BF5 is going to be the first mainline BF that i will not buy well not at launch maybe a year or so from now when it's worth the 14$ on origins
This game looks like a ps2 game with PS4 graphics. The ai is horrible. But on the upside there’s still single player missions unlike cod.
MACK PAYNE and the game only got like 5 sales ..... unlike cod it also doesn’t have a battle royale mode at launch.... unlike cod it doesn’t have a zombies mode ........unlike cod
This looks like those old games made by City Entertainment.
Nice one IGN for finally realizing that a 5 minute video isn't enough for games that have massively different and in-depth modes like COD with Zombies, Blackout and Classic Multiplayer.
7.3/10
So many people in this comment section that still remember everybody who participate
in WW2. And they all know exactly what each of them did. Kinda amazing how old the average gamer are.
@Mark Dion I'd literally bet legit money that the majority of them didn't, never have, and haven't legitimately learned anything about ww2 since they were in school (if most of them aren't still in school already)
I wonder if sales would be better if you could choose to just buy single player or multiplayer (or both). I’m not interested in the multiplayer but I’d buy single player.
I too have zero interest in the any FPS multiplayer game. But I like to play through the story. I would love if they split it and sold them separately.
Just make sure when you go to quit the game you give it plenty of time to save your progress unless you want to keep starting at the beginning.
1:55 history 100% accurate
"Don't like it, don't buy it" oke, guess I won't buy anthem either
THIS GAME IS *HOT TRASH*
no hot trash serves a purpose, it keeps you warm, it's cold garbage.
man i really want an openworld singleplayer(offline)war game that looks like this battlefield every war games is multiplayer game these days
Not enough cowboys wrangling vermin in this game!
3 2 hour campaigns? Are you frickin kidding me?
*Apparently history doesn't favor the truth either* -_-
I just saw a commercial for Battlefield V, but from the iconic music, It reminded me of BF1943.
Who here after it's free on ps plus ?...
Quit begging for likes, it's PATHETIC!
@@KevyB.relax u sound goofy
Alien isolation: 5.9
Battlefield 5: 7.3
Let that just sink in for a minute
Just do a whole review
BF1 & BF5 had great stories. I've bought them for ps4 ps5 xsx and pc. Probably my favorite FPS of all time.
Thank you for splitting up the reviews. I like that it allows you to dive more in-depth into each section of the game.
7.3...not enough loot boxes...
What a mess
I guess there were 2000+ educated viewers who liked this half assed review...
Battlefield started as a PC game.. And now its went back to be a "PC" game
I appreciate that you guys take the time to give an in-depth review, but splitting them up pisses me off. Also, your app won’t play videos properly, and that makes me look elsewhere even though I don’t want to
"3 2 hour campaigns" I've heard reviewers say each of the 3 take around an hour
Lol if you sit still for 30 days it'll take a month 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
So do we have wait about a year before the multiplayer review?
Get Woke Go Broke
BF1's war stories suffered from these exact same issues, but confusingly it was lauded a success. This is fair criticism
Is way better than Battlefield 1 Story Mode. And they love BF1 Story Mode...this make no sense
So, it appears that they just went all out in response to the fake outrage over historical accuracy. Sounds epic.
CrazySeanDX Why is it fake outrage??
6 hours of gameplay for $60
You forget about multiplayer?
$10 per hour
$10 per hour in singleplayer.
Hundreds of hours of fun in multiplayer.
So like $0.01 per hour?
@@StarContract I'd rather eat sand than support EA.
@@mvick4198 lol I highly doubt that if you were given $60 and forced to either give it to EA, or eat mouthfuls of sand for 40 hours to keep it, that you'd eat the sand.
That part with you having you to warm yourself from freezing is not new that was in Bad company 2 when you are running down the mountain after calling the satellite down.
Why 2 parts though?
It’s 3 parts - single player, MP and then a combined normal review. It’s IGN greed which was highlighted after BO4 had 4 reviews.
Wait so they give you only 3 missions to do for the story? With a further one being DLC...and what's with the AI?
#notmybattlefield #GetWokeGoBroke
How short is the campaign mode real or extremely
So, it was like this during that war! 🤯 #HistoricalAccuracy
“More than 800,000 women served in the Soviet Armed Forces during the war, which is roughly 3% of total military personnel, mostly as medics. About 300,000 served in anti-aircraft units and preformed all functions in the batteries- including firing the guns!” WOMEN DID SERVE IN THE WW2
how politically correct....white guy/white female/black guy .... lol !
yeh i thought exactly that when i was torturing myself through the 3 hours of single player.
When will this series finally have limbs blow off. MY SOCIOPATHIC TENDENCIES MUST BE QUENCHED
ps plus gang where you at
🙋🏾♂